Influence of pretransplant class I and II non-donor-specific anti-HLA immunization on immunologic outcome and graft survival in kidney transplant recipients

BackgroundAnti-HLA immunization determined by Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) is known to have a negative impact on patient and graft survival. The predictive value of peak PRA (pPRA) on immunologic outcome, however, and the individual effects of anti-HLA class I and II antibodies remain uncertain.MethodsThe influence of HLA immunization on immunologic outcome parameters and graft survival was investigated in 1150 adult patients without pretransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and in a subgroup of elderly kidney recipients aged ≥ 65 (n = 264). Anti-HLA immunization was defined as a pPRA > 0%. We investigated the influence of class I and II pPRA by dividing all kidney recipients into four pPRA groups (0%, 1–20%, 21–80%, >80%).ResultsPatients with non-donor-specific pretransplant anti-HLA immunization were at a higher risk for developing de novo DSA (49.9% vs. 18.7% p < 0.001), antibody mediated rejections (ABMR) (15.7% vs. 5.1%; p < 0.001), had a poorer death censored graft survival (69.2% vs. 86.2%; p < 0.001) and a higher decline of the calculated GFR. In elderly patients anti-HLA immunization only had a significant influence on the development of DSA (40.5% vs. 27.4%; p = 0.004). A multivariate model adjusted for all relevant factors revealed only class I but not class II pretransplant HLA immunization as a significant independent risk factor for de novo DSA, ABMR and death censored graft loss (HR 2.76, p < 0.001, HR 4.16, p < 0.001 and HR 2.07, p < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionMainly non-donor-specific pretransplant HLA class I immunization is an independent risk factor for the development of de novo DSA, ABMR and graft loss.     

Prognosis and Treatment for Active and Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients; Single Center Experience

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and treatment alternatives of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in renal transplant patients.MethodsThree thousand renal transplant patients were included in the study. The patients were first divided into 2 groups. Group 1: ABMR [-] recipients (n = 2871), Group 2: ABMR (+) recipients (n = 129). ABMR patients were compared among themselves by dividing them into 3 subgroups (early-active, late-active, chronic-active). The study was performed retrospectively. Different combinations of methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rituximab, plasmapheresis (PP), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) were used in the treatment and the results were compared.ResultsGraft survival and functions were worse and the rates of CAD, delayed graft function, BK virus, and cytomegalovirus higher in patients with ABMR. Also, graft survival was lower in patients with serum creatinine ≥3 (P = 0.001), GFR <30 (P <0.001), and spot urine protein to creatinine ratio ≥1 (P = 0.042) at the time of diagnosis. High interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy scores in chronic ABMR cases and high intimal arteritis scores in active ABMR cases were poor prognostic factors.ConclusionsThe study showed that ABMR has a poor prognosis in terms of clinical parameters, and treatment should be individualized according to pathologic findings and graft functions at the time of diagnosis. Pulse methylprednisolone and IVIG should be used in the treatment of all ABMR patients, but PP, rituximab, and ATG should be used in selected cases. ABMR has a poor prognosis and treatment should be individualized.     

Management of Immunosuppression After Kidney Transplant Failure: Effect on Patient Sensitization

BackgroundImmunosuppressive treatment is often interrupted in the first months following kidney transplant failure (KTF) to limit side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of prolonged treatment (PT) of more than 3 months’ duration after KTF on HLA sensitization and treatment tolerance.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational study involving 119 patients with KTF in 3 French kidney transplant centers between June 2007 and June 2017. Sensitization was defined as the development of HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA).ResultsIn the PT group receiving calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treatment, 30 of 52 patients (57.7%) were sensitized vs 52 of 67 patients (77.6%) who had early cessation of treatment (P = .02). The results were confirmed by multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.16; 0.98], P = .04). The development of de novo DSAs after CNI treatment (n = 63/90 [70.0%]) was significantly more frequent than during CNI treatment, (n = 18/52 [34.6%], P = .01). Panel-reactive antibody ≥85% was lower in the PT group in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.10; 0.78], P = .02). No differences in the rates of infection, cardiovascular complications, neoplasia, and deaths were observed between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, continuation of corticosteroid treatment had no influence on sensitization but was associated with a higher rate of infection (OR = 2.66, 95% CI [1.09; 6.46], P = .03).ConclusionMaintenance of CNI treatment after return to dialysis in patients requesting a repeat transplant could avoid the development of anti-HLA sensitization with a good tolerance.     

Clinical and Pathologic Feature of Patients With Early Versus Late Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

ObjectiveActive antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR), particularly late aABMR, remains a major challenge for long-term renal allograft survival. This single-center retrospective study aimed to compare clinical features between early vs late aABMR and to identify risk factors for allograft failure among patients with aABMR.MethodForty-one patients diagnosed with aABMR at our hospital were included and were divided into 2 groups: early aABMR (≤6 months; n = 10) vs late aABMR (>6 months; n = 31) based on the time from transplant to diagnosis. Their clinical and pathologic data were compared. This study was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul.ResultsOf 10 patients with early aABMR, none had allograft failure, whereas 8 of 31 patients with late aABMR had developed allograft failure at the time of follow-up (25.8%). At the time of biopsy, patients with early aABMR had higher positive grade in urine occult blood test than patients with late aABMR (P = .01); however, the late aABMR group displayed more intensive interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (P = .03) and more frequent HLA-DQ-type donor-specific antibodies. Interestingly, donor-specific antibody conversion from positive to negative was not associated with C4d grade but was correlated with time from transplant to biopsy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high levels of serum creatinine or proteinuria and concomitant T-cell-mediated rejection were independent risk factors for allograft failure in patients with aABMR.ConclusionThese data not only confirm that early aABMR has better clinical outcomes than late aABMR but highlight the importance of early diagnostic biopsy and early therapeutic interventions in ABMR, particularly in patients with high levels of serum creatinine or proteinuria in the early posttransplant phase.     

Impact of HLA eplet mismatch load in immunological outcomes after living donor kidney transplantation

IntroductionHLA eplets mismatches (eMM) have been associated with negative kidney outcomes after transplantation, such as the development of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), and early graft loss. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of the HLA eMM load on dnDSA development, ABMR, renal function, allograft survival and graft loss.Material and methodsThis retrospective study involved 159 living donor kidney transplant patients categorized into groups based on antigen HLA mismatches assessed traditionally and HLA eMM load. Patients had followed for at least one year. The EpViX online program was used to evaluate the HLA eMM load. Cox models were constructed to assess the risk of graft loss. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were carried out. The analyses had performed using the R program and p < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsFrom all 159 patients, 28 (17.6%) lost their allografts. Rejection episodes occurred in 37.1% of patients, 13.6% of whom were ABMR. Patients with rejection episodes had higher HLA-AB (p = 0.032) and HLA-DR (p = 0.008) HLA eMM load, HLA-AB (p = 0.006) and HLA-DR (p = 0.009) antigens mismatches, and higher proportions of the following eMM in the HLA-DR locus: 70R eMM (p = 0.015), 70RE (p = 0.015), 74E (p = 0.015) and 48Q (p = 0.047). In multiple models, the presence of HLA-DR 70qq eMM (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.47; 9.55) add an increase in creatinine levels at 1-year (HR 3.87, 95% CI 2.30, 6.53) were associated with the risk of graft loss.ConclusionThe HLA eMM load was related to episodes of rejection and allograft loss. The HLA-DR eMM was most strongly associated with a worse immunologic outcome than eMM mismatches for HLA-AB.     

Donor-derived cell-free DNA: An independent biomarker in kidney transplant patients with antibody-mediated rejection

IntroductionAntibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major cause of kidney transplant failure which requires donor-specific antibodies (DSA) for a definitive diagnosis. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) is an emerging biomarker used to assess kidney allograft injury. However, current data is limited to predict the accuracy of ddcfDNA in ABMR diagnosis. This study was conducted to compare the performance of DSA with plasma ddcfDNA for the diagnosis of ABMR.MethodsIn this retrospective single-center observational study, we enrolled 50 kidney transplant recipients who were diagnosed with the suspicion of rejection between June 2018 and May 2019 at the Jinling Hospital. Plasma ddcfDNA was measured by using a novel target region capture sequencing methodology. A total of 37 patients who were tested with DSA and biopsy were divided into four subgroups (ABMR+/DSA+, ABMR+/DSA-, ABMR-/DSA+, ABMR-/DSA-) for the distribution of ddcfDNA (%) by ABMR and DSA.ResultsThe median level of ddcfDNA in biopsy showed that the ABMR group (1.66%, IQR 1.34–3.76%) was significantly higher than the median level (0.63%, IQR 0.43–0.74%) in non-ABMR (p < 0.001). With a ddcfDNA cutoff of 0.96%, the AUC was 0.90 (95%CI, 0.86–0.95), which was associated with a sensitivity of 90.5% (95%CI, 69.6–98.8%) and specificity of 96.6% (95%CI, 82.2–100%), a PPV of 95% (95%CI, 73.4–99.2%) and NPV of 93.3% (95%CI, 78.9–98.1%) were also observed. Among the four subgroups, ddcfDNA had no significant difference in both DSA+ group and DSA-group (p > 0.05). In the diagnosis of ABMR, the specificity, sensitivity, PPV and NPV of DSA were 50%, 74.1%, 41.7%, 80%, respectively.ConclusionsddcfDNA levels in the blood could highly distinguish (biopsy-supported) ABMR occurrence, irrespective of whether this method is accompanied by DSA or not.     

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Outcomes of Late Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Thai Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has worse prognosis than early ABMR. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical and pathological features of late acute ABMR in our experience.

Method

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent kidney transplantation (KT) between January 2001 and December 2012. Patients who had glomerulitis and/or peritubular capillaritis on kidney biopsy performed 6 months after KT were enrolled.

Results

Of 592 patients, late acute ABMR was diagnosed in 34 cases (5.74%) with a mean onset of 49.2 ± 30.2 months post-KT. Six patients (17.6%) had nonadherence. Allograft histopathology demonstrated concomitant transplant glomerulopathy in 23 patients (67.6%) and positive peritubular C4d staining in 25 patients (73.5%). Donor-specific antibody (DSA) was detected in 25 patients (73.5%). Anti-HLA class II antibody was more prevalent than class I (67.6% vs 20.6%; P = .003) and most of them were anti-HLA DQ. We prescribed intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) 1–2 g/kg for 30 patients (88.2%), plasma exchange (PE) for 27 patients (79.4%), and rituximab 375 mg/m² for 18 patients (52.9%). We repeated treatment with PE and IVIG in 12 refractory cases. For clinical outcome, 21 patients (61.7%) had deterioration of graft function; 9 of them (26.5%) eventually lost their graft. Thirteen patients (38.2%) had stable graft function.

Conclusion

Late acute ABMR has unsatisfactory prognosis in spite of aggressive standard antihumoral treatment. Surveillance of late ABMR using DSA monitoring may be helpful in early detection and management.     

Presentation and Outcomes of Antibody-Mediated Rejection Associated With Angiotensin II Receptor 1 Antibodies Among Kidney Transplant Recipients

BackgroundIt remains challenging to manage antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) associated with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) in kidney transplant recipients and the outcomes are not well defined. We describe the presentation, clinical course, and outcomes of this condition.MethodsThis retrospective study included kidney transplant recipients with AT1R-Ab levels ≥10 units/mL and biopsy-proven ABMR in the absence of significant HLA-donor-specific antibodies at the time of rejection.ResultsWe identified 13 recipients. Median creatinine (Cr) at rejection was significantly higher (2.05 mg/dL) compared with baseline (1.2 mg/dL), P = .006. After ABMR management, the difference in median Cr was not significant (1.5 mg/dL), P = .152. Median AT1R-Ab level was higher in the pretransplant sample (34.5 units/mL) compared with the level at rejection (19 units/mL) and after rejection treatment (13 units/mL); however, these differences were not significant, P = .129. Eight of the 13 recipients received antibody reduction therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin, and 5 of the 13 recipients had other therapies. After rejection management, 6 of the 13 recipients had improvement in Cr to baseline and 7 of the 13 recipients had > 50% reduction in proteinuria.ConclusionsAT1R-Ab–associated ABMR management and outcomes depend on the clinical presentation and may include antibody-reducing therapies among other therapies. Further prospective cohorts will improve recognizing and managing this condition.     

Subclinical Rejection Phenotypes at 1 Year Post-Transplant and Outcome of Kidney Allografts

Kidney allograft rejection can occur in clinically stable patients, but long-term significance is unknown. We determined whether early recognition of subclinical rejection has long-term consequences for kidney allograft survival in an observational prospective cohort study of 1307 consecutive nonselected patients who underwent ABO-compatible, complement-dependent cytotoxicity-negative crossmatch kidney transplantation in Paris (2000–2010). Participants underwent prospective screening biopsies at 1 year post-transplant, with concurrent evaluations of graft complement deposition and circulating anti-HLA antibodies. The main analysis included 1001 patients. Three distinct groups of patients were identified at the 1-year screening: 727 (73%) patients without rejection, 132 (13%) patients with subclinical T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and 142 (14%) patients with subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Patients with subclinical ABMR had the poorest graft survival at 8 years post-transplant (56%) compared with subclinical TCMR (88%) and nonrejection (90%) groups (P<0.001). In a multivariate Cox model, subclinical ABMR at 1 year was independently associated with a 3.5-fold increase in graft loss (95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 5.7) along with eGFR and proteinuria (P<0.001). Subclinical ABMR was associated with more rapid progression to transplant glomerulopathy. Of patients with subclinical TCMR at 1 year, only those who further developed de novo donor-specific antibodies and transplant glomerulopathy showed higher risk of graft loss compared with patients without rejection. Our findings suggest that subclinical TCMR and subclinical ABMR have distinct effects on long-term graft loss. Subclinical ABMR detected at the 1-year screening biopsy carries a prognostic value independent of initial donor-specific antibody status, previous immunologic events, current eGFR, and proteinuria.     

Correlation of Luminex-Based Single Antigen Based Results With Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Crossmatch and Flow Cytometry Crossmatch Results: A Single-Center Experience From Istanbul

BackgroundThis study aimed to retrospectively investigate the correlation of mean Class I donor-specific antibody (DSA) intensity values detected in Luminex-based techniques with the results of complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) results.MethodsA total of 335 patients with kidney failure and their living donors whose CDC-XM, FC-XM, and single antigen based (SAB) tests were studied between 2018 and 2020 for transplant preparation from living donor candidates were included in the study. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to their mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of SAB assay.ResultsAnti-HLA antibodies (class I and/or class II) were detected using SAB in 91.6% patients included in the study (MFI >1000). Class I DSA was positive in 34.8% of patients with anti-HLA antibodies. When CDC-XM and FC-XM results were evaluated in the 4 groups separated according to MFI values, 3 patients with DSA MFI <1000 had negative CDC-XM and T-B-FC-XM results. Of 32 patients with DSA-MFI between 1000 and 3000, 93.75% (n = 30) had T-B-FC-XM or CDC-XM-negative results, and 6.25% (n = 2) had B-FC-XM-positive results. The CDC-XM, T, and B-FC-XM were negative in all 17 patients with DSA-MFI between 3000 and 5000. Our results showed that MFI >5834 DSA values were significantly correlated with positive T-FC-XM (P < .001), and MFI >6016 values were significantly correlated with positive CDC-XM (P = .002). In addition, MFI values >5000 were associated with both CDC-XM and FC-XM in our study.ConclusionsThe MFI values >5000 correlated with both CDC-XM and FC-XM.     

Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation Performed in a Low-Volume Center by Visiting Surgeons From a High-Volume Center and Managed Clinically Solely by Nephrologists: 1-Year Outcomes

BackgroundLittle is known about the outcome of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) performed in low-volume centers lacking the services of full-time transplant surgeons. This retrospective cohort study assessed the outcome of LDKT performed in a low-volume center by visiting transplant surgeons from a high-volume center and managed perioperatively by transplant nephrologists.MethodsWe compared Japanese adult patients who had no donor-specific antibodies and underwent LDKT between 2006 and 2015 either in a low-volume (n = 31) or high-volume (n = 481) center. In the low-volume center, visiting transplant surgeons from the high-volume center conducted LDKT and transplant nephrologists managed the recipients peri- and postoperatively. The primary outcome was the composite of infection, cardiovascular disease, or cancer during 1-year follow-up. The outcomes of the low- and high-volume centers were compared using 1:2 propensity score matching.ResultsAfter matching, 9 of 29 patients in the low-volume center (31.0%) and 16 of 58 patients in the high-volume center (27.6%) experienced the primary composite outcome (risk ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-2.23). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in graft function at 1 year, all-cause graft loss, biopsy-proven rejection, and urological complications. However, the median duration of post-LDKT hospitalization was significantly longer in the low-volume center than in the high-volume center (23 and 16 days, respectively).ConclusionsAmong Japanese patients without preformed donor-specific antibodies, LDKT conducted at a low-volume center by visiting transplant surgeons from a high-volume center and managed clinically by transplant nephrologists was not associated with significantly higher risk of postoperative complications.     

Significance of HLA-matching and anti-HLA antibodies in heart transplant patients receiving induction therapy?

ObjectivesThough Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matching benefits are demonstrated in renal transplantation, evidence in heart transplantation is lacking, and its clinical feasibility is uncertain. Post-transplantation anti-HLA antibodies are being increasingly studied in organ transplantation, with diverging conclusions between transplantated organs.MethodsWe analyzed retrospectively the influence of HLA matching and anti-HLA antibodies on overall survival, acute rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy in 309 patients receiving induction therapy and triple-drug immunosuppression.ResultsThe average number of HLA-A/B/DR mismatches between donor and recipient was 4.9 ± 1. The majority of mismatches was for Class I HLA-A/B with an average of 3.3, then for Class I HLA-DR with an average of 1.6. Overall, the HLA-A/-B/-DR mismatches had no influence on the cardiac allograft survival (p = 0.28). However, HLA-DR mismatches were negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection (p = 0.04). Our analysis found anti-HLA antibodies in 27% of recipients, de novo anti-HLA antibodies in 16% of recipients, and donor-specific anti-HLA (DSA) antibodies in 8% of recipients. Furthermore, de novo DSA had no influence on the 5-year survival (78% with DSA vs. 92% without DSA; p = 0.49), which may be masked by the limited number of recipients in analysis By univariable analysis, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on severe cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy.ConclusionsHLA-DR mismatch was negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection but had no influence on cardiac allograft survival. In this study, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy. The results of this study add to the controversy on the impact of allo-antibodies in heart transplant recipients receiving induction therapy and contemporary immunosuppression.     

Impact of the immunotherapy induction on allograft outcome and survival in kidney transplant patients with donor-specific antibodies to HLA-DQB1

BackgroundThe presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against HLA-DQB1 is considered a significant barrier to good outcome and allograft survival in kidney transplantation (KT). This study aimed to assess the impact of induction immunotherapy on the outcome and allograft survival in KT patients with HLA-DQB1-DSA.MethodologyThirty-two patients who had undergone KT and found to be positive for HLA-DQB1-DSA were monitored at least one to 10 years. They were allocated into two groups of patients: G1 received induction immunotherapy (n = 14 patients; 43.75%), and G2 did not (n = 18 patients; 56.25%).ResultsIn G1, 6 (42.86%) patients experienced rejection episodes (RE), 2 (14.29%) due to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and 4 (28.57%) due to T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). In G2, 13 (72.22%) patients experienced RE, 3 (16.67%) due to ABMR, and 10 (55.56%) due to TCMR. Graft loss occurred in 4 patients from G1, 2 (14.29%) due to ABMR and 2 (14.29%) due to non-immunological causes. In G2, 9 (50.00%) patients lost their grafts, 2 (11.11%) due to TCMR, 2 (11.11%) due to ABMR, and 5 (27.78%) due to non-immunological causes. The graft survival rate was 64.29% in G1 and 45.83% in G2. Glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis were observed in 3 and C4d-positive patients with/or without induction who lost their grafts by ABMR by HLA-DQ DSA. Two patients from G2 lost their graft by TCMR due to interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate (i1), foci of mild tubulitis (t2), interstitial edema, moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Better graft survival rates were shown in patients from G1 who received induction immunotherapy.ConclusionOur study suggests that patients with an immunological profile of HLA-DQ+ DSA+ treated by immunotherapy induction have a decreased risk of ABMR and increased allograft survival, and the presence of anti-HLA-DQB1 DSA+ detected before and after KT were associated with ABMR episodes and failure.     

Analysis of Specificity of Anti–Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies in Kidney Recipients in Reference to Clinical Outcome

Background

Anti–human leukocyte antigens antibodies (HLA) are not always the main cause of graft injury but can be a marker of immune response to the graft. The aim of this study was to analyze anti-HLA specificities with the use of the most sensitive detection method (Luminex) in reference to clinical condition.

Methods

Sera of 65 kidney recipients (n = 443) were screened with the use of the mixed LABScreen kit, and, for 47 recipients, sera with maximal normalized background ratio (NBG) were subjected to specificity testing. NBG, numbers of specificities, donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and normalized mean fluorescence index (nMFI) of DSA and maximal anti-HLA were analyzed in reference to clinical (acute rejection [AR] diagnosis, immunosuppression), histopathological (C4d staining, chronic allograft nephropathy, AR type), and laboratory parameters (creatinine).

Results

We observed 1 to 51 specificities, class I DSA in 26.7%, class II in 10%, and estimated DQ-DSA in 63.3% of tested patients. Patients with AR and humoral AR had significantly higher NBG, number of anti-HLA class I, DQ and DQ-DSA types, and more frequently had anti-HLA and class II DSA-positive sera (P < .052). C4d staining was associated with higher anti-HLA class I (P = .053) and class I DSA (P = .002) type numbers, and maximal anti-HLA nMFI (P = .036) and was more frequent in AR (P = .048) and class II DSA positive patients (P = .046). Patients with chronic allograft nephropathy showed higher DQ-DSA-nMFI (P = .036). DQ-DSA-nMFI and maximal anti-HLA-nMFI correlated with creatinine increase (Spearman range [SR] = 0.64, SR = 0.41). Together with NBG, maximal class I and class II anti-HLA-nMFI correlated with the number of transplantation and maximal panel-reactive antibodies ratio (SR = 0.19–0.40).

Conclusions

Anti-HLA detection allows for humoral AR diagnosis but also for identification of patients with risk of any rejection. However, clear rules of anti-HLA interpretation and studies on their clinical impact are needed.     

Single-Dose Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Compared With Divided-Dose for Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplantation in a Predominantly Black Population

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare single-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) with a divided dose in kidney transplant recipients within a majority Black patient population.MethodsWe analyzed the outcomes before and after a change in protocol from divided-dose (1.5 mg/kg/day over 4 days) to single-dose (6 mg/kg over 24 hours) rATG in a retrospective cohort study. All patients who received rATG for kidney transplant induction between December 2015 and July 2018 were included.ResultsA total of 197 patients (n = 98 in the divided-dose group, n = 99 in the single-dose group) received rATG. There was no difference in time to rejection at 1 year (P = .82) or incidence of rejection (P = .80). There was also no difference in delayed graft function, serum creatinine, or survival at 1 year. Patients in the single-dose group were more likely to leave the hospital by postoperative day 3 (12% vs 2%, P = .006). The cytomegalovirus infection rate was higher in the single-dose group (P = .031).ConclusionsUse of a single-dose rATG regimen is an acceptable accelerated induction compared with the standard divided dose for induction therapy in kidney transplant in a predominantly Black population.     

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination is not associated with the induction of anti-HLA or non-HLA antibodies

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 vaccination is strongly recommended in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and dialysis patients. Whether these vaccinations may trigger alloantibodies, is still debated.MethodsIn the current study we evaluated the effect of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines on anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) and 60 anti-non-HLA antibody profiles in clinically stable KTR and dialysis patients. In total, we included 28 KTR, 30 patients on haemodialysis, 25 patients on peritoneal dialysis and 31 controls with a positive seroresponse 16–21 days after the first dose of either the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine. Both anti-HLA and anti-non-HLA antibodies were determined prior to vaccination and 21 to 35 days after the second vaccine dose.ResultsOverall, the proportion of patients with detectable anti-HLA antibodies was similar before and after vaccination (class I 14% vs. 16%, p = 0.48; class II 25% before and after vaccination). After vaccination, there was no pattern in 1) additionally detected anti-HLA antibodies, or 2) the levels of pre-existing ones. Additional anti-non-HLA antibodies were detected in 30% of the patients, ranging from 1 to 5 new anti-non-HLA antibodies per patient. However, the clinical significance of anti-non-HLA antibodies is still a matter of debate. To date, only a significant association has been found for anti-non-HLA ARHGDIB antibodies and long-term kidney graft loss. No additionally developed anti-ARHGDIB antibodies or elevated level of existing anti-ARHGDIB antibodies was observed.ConclusionThe current data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination does not induce anti-HLA or anti-non-HLA antibodies, corroborating the importance of vaccinating KTR and dialysis patients.     

Low-dose Thymoglobulin vs Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Low-Risk Living Related Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Randomized Trial

ContextThymoglobulin is used effectively as induction agent in kidney transplantation but the optimal dose is not well established.ObjectiveDemonstrate that low-dose thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg) has similar efficacy and safety compared to basiliximab induction in low-risk kidney transplantation under standard maintenance immunosuppressionDesign, Setting, ParticipantsProspective randomized study in kidney transplant patients (12/2016-05/2018). Inclusion criteria: Recipients > 18 years, first living donor transplant. Exclusion criteria: Second and multiorgan transplant, ABO incompatibility, positive cross-match, panel reactive antibodies (PRA) > 30%, positive donor-specific antibody, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C virus positive, white blood cells < 2000 cells/mm³, platelets < 75,000 cells/mm³ and malignancy.InterventionGroup A: basiliximab (20 mg D0 and D4). Group B: thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg total). Maintenance immunosuppression: tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.Main Outcome MeasuresBiopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), delayed graft function, slow graft function, leukopenia, infections, adverse events, graft loss, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and death within 12 months.Results100 patients (basiliximab, n = 53) (thymoglobulin, n = 47) were included. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar except for longer dialysis (basiliximab), PRA class I (1.2% basiliximab, 4.5% thymoglobulin), HLA match (basiliximab 2.8, thymoglobulin 2.2), and cytomegalovirus status. BPAR rate was basiliximab 3.8% and thymoglobulin 6.4% (P = ns). Delayed graft function (basiliximab 3.8%; thymoglobulin 4.3%), slow graft function, and 12-month leukopenia (basiliximab 11.3%, thymoglobulin 21.3%) were similar between groups (P = ns). There was no difference in infections and adverse events between groups. Patient and graft survival were as follows: basiliximab 98.1% and 92.5%, thymoglobulin 100% and 93.6% (P = ns).ConclusionLow-dose thymoglobulin induction (3 mg/kg) can be used effectively and safely in low-risk kidney transplantation with good results during the first year post-transplant.     

Impact of early blood transfusion after kidney transplantation on the clinical outcomes and allograft survival

IntroductionAnemia in chronic kidney disease is of great concern regarding blood transfusions and the possibility of allosensitization for future kidney transplants and the occurrence of rejection and allograft loss in the post-transplant period. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of early blood transfusion on the occurrence of rejections, allograft function and survival in the first year after transplantation.Material and methodsThis retrospective study was carried out with 445 patients submitted to kidney transplant allocated to two groups. The first group received early blood transfusions after transplant (n = 125, 28.09%), and the second group did not receive blood transfusions (n = 320, 71.91%). The patient outcomes were evaluated during a 1-year follow-up.Results14 patients given blood transfusion (11.2%) lost their allograft in the first year in comparison with 8 (2.5%) without transfusion (p < 0.001). There were 9 deaths in each group, which corresponded to 7.2% of the patients who received blood transfusions and 2.81% of those who did not (p < 0.035). Patient hospitalization lasted 15 days in transfusion group and 8.5 days in non-transfusion group (p < 0.001). Creatinine levels were higher in the patients who received blood transfusion than in those without transfusion in the first and third months after transplantation (p = 0.012 and 0.038, respectively). During the first year, the patients who received blood products experienced more antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) (13.60%) than patients who did not (4.38%) (p < 0.001). Those who received blood transfusions also developed de novo DSA in higher proportion than those without transfusion against both class I and class II HLA (p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study showed that blood transfusions in the first month after transplantation had a negative impact on kidney function, graft survival, and contributed to the development of de novo DSA, an increased risk of ABMR and infections.     

C3d-binding Donor-specific HLA Antibody Is Associated With a High Risk of Antibody-mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-center Cohort Study

Background

One risk factor for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and poor outcome after kidney transplantation is donor-specific anti?human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies (DSAs). In this study we sought to determine whether the presence of DSAs that bind complement component C3d could better predict ABMR and graft loss in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

Body Mass Index and Kidney Donor Profile Index as Prognostic Markers of the Outcome of Renal Transplantation

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the effects of Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and body mass index (BMI) of the deceased donor on the kidney allograft outcome 1 year after transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 98 deceased kidney allograft donors with a mean age of 56 ± 12 years. The donors were divided into 5 groups according to their BMI: Normal ΒΜΙ = 25 (n = 25); ΒΜΙ 25 to 29 = Overweight (n = 33); ΒΜΙ 30 to 34.9 = Obese class I (n = 19); ΒΜΙ 35 to 39 = Obese class ΙΙ (n = 11); and ΒΜΙ >40 = Obese class III (n = 10). We examined the impact of the deceased donor's BMI and KDPI on delayed graft function (DGF) and estimated renal glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (measured by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) 1 year after transplantation.ResultsDonor BMI significantly increased the prevalence of DGF (P = .031), and it was associated with higher cold ischemia time (P = .021). However, there was no significant association between the aforementioned BMI groups and 1-year eGFR (P = 0.57), as deceased grafts from donors with increased BMI (BMI > 40) gained sufficient renal function during the first year of transplantation. Moreover, high KDPI was associated not only with DGF (P = .015), but also with decreased values of eGFR (P = .033).ConclusionIn this population, we identified no significant association between donor BMI and long-term clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplants. KDPI, and not ΒΜΙ, of the deceased donor seems to be a good prognostic factor of renal function at the end of the first year after kidney transplant, whereas high BMI and high KDPI markedly induce DGF.