Rare BRAF mutations in melanoma patients: implications for molecular testing in clinical practice

Background:

The detection of V600E BRAF mutation in melanoma is fundamental since here BRAF inhibitors represent an effective treatment. Non-V600E BRAF mutations that may also respond are not detected by certain screening methods. Thus, knowledge about detection of these mutations is needed.

Methods:

A total of 276 tumour samples from 174 melanoma patients were investigated for BRAF mutations by pyrosequencing. Rare mutations were confirmed by capillary sequencing and compared with findings from COBAS test and immunohistochemistry using a novel BRAF antibody. Melanoma type, localisation, and survival were summarised.

Results:

BRAF mutations were found in 43% of patients (124 tumours in 75 patients). Among those, 14 patients (18.7%) exhibited rare mutations. The V600EK601del and V600DK601del mutations have never been described before in melanoma. Furthermore, V600K, V600E2, and V600D, V600G, V600R, and L597S mutations were detected. Mutations were not detected by COBAS test in 7 out of these 14 patients and immunohistochemistry only reliably detected patients with the V600E2 and V600EK601del mutation.

Conclusion:

Accurate diagnosis of rare BRAF mutations is crucial. We show that pyrosequencing is accurate, highly sensitive, reliable, and time saving to detect rare BRAF mutations. Missing these rare variant mutations would exclude a subset of patients from available effective BRAF-targeting therapy.     

Correlation of BRAF and NRAS mutation status with outcome,site of distant metastasis and response to chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma

Background:

The prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in metastatic melanoma patients remains uncertain, with several studies reporting conflicting results, often biased by the inclusion of patients treated with BRAF and MEK (MAPK) inhibitors. We therefore interrogated a historical cohort of patients free of the confounding influence of MAPK inhibitor therapy.

Methods:

Patients with available archival tissue first diagnosed with metastatic melanoma between 2002 and 2006 were analysed. Mutational analysis was performed using the OncoCarta Panel. Patient characteristics, treatment outcome and survival were correlated with BRAF/NRAS mutation status.

Results:

In 193 patients, 92 (48%) melanomas were BRAF-mutant, 39 (20%) were NRAS-mutant and 62 (32%) were wild-type for BRAF/NRAS mutations (wt). There was no difference in response to chemotherapy based on mutation status (35–37%). The distant disease-free interval (DDFI) was significantly shorter in patients with wt melanoma (27.9 months vs 35.1 for BRAF and 49.1 for NRAS) although this was not significant in multivariate analysis. Survival from stage IV melanoma diagnosis was not significantly different based on mutation status. The DDFI was significantly shorter in patients with BRAF^V600K/R versus BRAF^V600E melanoma in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Conclusions:

BRAF and NRAS mutation status does not influence survival in metastatic melanoma.     

Polyclonality of BRAF mutations in primary melanoma and the selection of mutant alleles during progression

Background:

Oncogenic BRAF mutation had been considered to be a founder event in the formation of melanocytic tumours; however, we recently argued against this notion by showing marked polyclonality of BRAF mutations in acquired melanocytic nevi (Lin et al, J Natl Cancer Inst., 2009; 101:1423–7). Here, we tested whether similar heterogeneity of BRAF mutations exists in primary melanomas.

Methods:

We isolated and sequenced single melanoma cells from five primary melanoma tissues using antibodies against human high-molecular-weight melanoma-associated antigen. We also examined 10 primary melanomas by the sensitive Mutector assay detecting the BRAF^V600E mutation, as well as by cloning and sequencing of separated alleles. Furthermore, we estimated the frequency of BRAF mutant alleles in paired samples of primary tumour and recurrence or metastasis in three patients.

Results:

Single-cell mutation analyses revealed that four of five primary melanomas contained both BRAF-wild-type and BRAF-mutant tumour cells. Tumour heterogeneity in terms of BRAF mutations was also shown in 8 of 10 primary melanomas. Selection of BRAF mutant alleles during progression was demonstrated in all the three patients.

Conclusion:

Acquisition of a BRAF mutation is not a founder event, but may be one of the multiple clonal events in melanoma development, which is selected for during the progression.     

Impact of mutational status on survival in low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum

Background:

Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is a distinct, well- recognized histologic subtype characterized by young age at diagnosis, relative chemoresistance, and prolonged overall survival. Common mutations reported to be found within this subtype include KRAS and BRAF.

Methods:

Using clinical information of patients from our IRB-approved registry and tissue from a subset of these patients, we performed mutational analysis for KRAS and BRAF using the direct Sanger sequencing technique and correlated findings with the clinical outcome, overall survival (OS).

Results:

In 79 cases, patients with KRAS or BRAF mutations (n=21) had a significantly better OS than those with wild-type KRAS or BRAF (n=58) (106.7 months (95% CI, 50.6, 162.9) vs 66.8 months (95% CI, 43.6, 90.0)), respectively (P=0.018).

Conclusions:

Mutational status appears to be a potential prognostic factor in low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum.     

KRAS-mutated plasma DNA as predictor of outcome from irinotecan monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Background:

We investigated the clinical implications of KRAS and BRAF mutations detected in both archival tumor tissue and plasma cell-free DNA in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan monotherapy.

Methods:

Two hundred and eleven patients receiving second-line irinotecan (350 mg m⁻² q3w) were included in two independent cohorts. Plasma was obtained from pretreatment EDTA blood-samples. Mutations were detected in archival tumour and plasma with qPCR methods.

Results:

Mutation status in tumor did not correlate to efficacy in either cohort, whereas none of the patients with mutations detectable in plasma responded to therapy. Response rate and disease control rate in plasma KRAS wt patients were 19 and 66% compared with 0 and 37%, in patients with pKRAS mutations, (P=0.04 and 0.01). Tumor KRAS status was not associated with PFS but with OS in the validation cohort. Plasma BRAF and KRAS demonstrated a strong influence on both PFS and OS. The median OS was 13.0 mo in pKRAS wt patients and 7.8 in pKRAS-mutated, (HR=2.26, P<0.0001). PFS was 4.6 and 2.7 mo, respectively (HR=1,69, P=0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic value of pKRAS status but not KRAS tumor status.

Conclusion:

Tumor KRAS has minor clinical impact, whereas plasma KRAS status seems to hold important predictive and prognostic information.     

Melanoma-expressed CD70 is involved in invasion and metastasis

Background:

CD70 is a costimulatory molecule of the tumour necrosis factor family expressed in activated immune cells and some solid tumours. In lymphocytes CD70 triggers T cell-mediated cytotoxicity and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation.

Methods:

We evaluated the expression of CD70 in biopsies and melanoma cell lines. Using melanoma cell lines positive or not for CD70, we analysed CD70 function on melanoma progression.

Results:

We report CD70 expression in human melanoma cell lines and tumour cells from melanoma biopsies. This expression was observed in 95% of primary melanomas but only 37% of metastases. Both monomeric and trimeric forms of CD70 were detected in tumour cell membrane fractions, whereas cytoplasmic fractions contained almost exclusively monomeric CD70. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that CD70 expression inhibited melanoma cell migration, invasion and pulmonary metastasis implantation independently of the tumour immune microenvironment. Increasing the levels of the trimeric form of CD70 through monoclonal antibody binding led to an increase in CD70+ melanoma cell invasiveness through MAPK pathway activation, RhoE overexpression, ROCK1 and MYPT1 phosphorylation decrease, and stress fibres and focal adhesions disappearance.

Conclusions:

Our results describe a new non-immunological function of melanoma-expressed CD70, which involves melanoma invasiveness through MAPK pathway, RhoE and cytoskeletal modulation.     

The combination of axitinib followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin yields extended survival in advanced BRAF wild-type melanoma: results of a clinical/correlative prospective phase II clinical trial

Background:

Simultaneous chemotherapy with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition has not shown additional benefit over chemotherapy alone in advanced melanoma. We tested administration of the potent VEGF inhibitor axitinib followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin to determine whether enhanced tumour proliferation during axitinib withdrawal leads to sustained chemosensitivity.

Methods:

We conducted a prospective phase II trial in metastatic melanoma patients with ECOG performance status 0–1 and normal organ function. Axitinib 5 mg PO b.i.d. was taken on days 1–14 of each 21-day treatment cycle, and carboplatin (AUC=5) with paclitaxel (175 mg m⁻²) was administered on day 1 starting with cycle 2. 3′-Deoxy-3′-¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (¹⁸F-FLT)-PET scans were performed in five patients to assess tumour proliferation on days 1, 14, 17, and 20 of cycle 1. Molecular profiling for BRAF was performed for all patients with cutaneous, acral, or mucosal melanoma.

Results:

The treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade 3 AEs were hypertension, neutropenia, and anaemia. Grade 4 non-haematologic AEs were not observed. Four of five patients completing ¹⁸F-FLT-PET scans showed increases (23–92%) in SUV values during the axitinib holiday. Of 36 evaluable patients, there were 8 confirmed PRs by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall, 20 patients had SD and 8 had PD as the best response. The median PFS was 8.7 months and the median overall survival was 14.0 months. Five BRAF^V600E/K patients had significantly worse PFS than patients without these mutations.

Conclusions:

Axitinib followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel was well tolerated and effective in BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma. 3′-Deoxy-3′-¹⁸F-fluorothymidine-PET scans showed increased proliferation during axitinib withdrawal.     

Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

Background:

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a variant of breast carcinoma with a higher propensity for lymph node metastases compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of 636 IMPC and 297 735 IDC cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database comparing disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between IMPC and IDC.

Results:

A higher percentage of IMPC cases (52.0%) had nodal metastases compared with IDC cases (34.6%). The 5-year DSS and OS for IMPC was 91.8% and 82.9%, respectively compared with 88.6% and 80.5% for IDC, respectively. For both IMPC and IDC, oestrogen-receptor positivity was associated with better survival, while having four or more positive lymph nodes or larger tumour size correlated with worse survival. Radiotherapy provided a survival benefit for both histological types.

Conclusions:

Despite IMPC''s higher propensity for lymph node metastasis, IMPC has DSS and OS that compare favourably with IDC.     

A feasibility study testing four hypotheses with phase II outcomes in advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS3): a model for randomised controlled trials in the era of personalised medicine?

Background:

Molecular characteristics of cancer vary between individuals. In future, most trials will require assessment of biomarkers to allocate patients into enriched populations in which targeted therapies are more likely to be effective. The MRC FOCUS3 trial is a feasibility study to assess key elements in the planning of such studies.

Patients and Methods:

Patients with advanced colorectal cancer were registered from 24 centres between February 2010 and April 2011. With their consent, patients'' tumour samples were analysed for KRAS/BRAF oncogene mutation status and topoisomerase 1 (topo-1) immunohistochemistry. Patients were then classified into one of four molecular strata; within each strata patients were randomised to one of two hypothesis-driven experimental therapies or a common control arm (FOLFIRI chemotherapy). A 4-stage suite of patient information sheets (PISs) was developed to avoid patient overload.

Results:

A total of 332 patients were registered, 244 randomised. Among randomised patients, biomarker results were provided within 10 working days (w.d.) in 71%, 15 w.d. in 91% and 20 w.d. in 99%. DNA mutation analysis was 100% concordant between two laboratories. Over 90% of participants reported excellent understanding of all aspects of the trial. In this randomised phase II setting, omission of irinotecan in the low topo-1 group was associated with increased response rate and addition of cetuximab in the KRAS, BRAF wild-type cohort was associated with longer progression-free survival.

Conclusions:

Patient samples can be collected and analysed within workable time frames and with reproducible mutation results. Complex multi-arm designs are acceptable to patients with good PIS. Randomisation within each cohort provides outcome data that can inform clinical practice.     

The impact of comorbidity and stage on prognosis of Danish melanoma patients, 1987–2009: a registry-based cohort study

Background:

Comorbid conditions may play an important role in the prognosis of melanoma patients but have received little attention.

Methods:

Using data from Danish registries, we identified patients diagnosed with melanoma from 1987 to 2009. We estimated the prevalence of comorbidity and calculated mortality rate ratios and interaction risks between melanoma and comorbidity. For every melanoma patient, 10 individuals were selected for comparison. Individuals in the comparison cohort were matched to their corresponding melanoma patients on age, gender, and exact prevalent comorbidities.

Results:

We included 23 476 patients, 81% of whom had no comorbidity. Higher prevalence of comorbidity was associated with more advanced cancer stage. The standardised mortality rate increased with increasing level of comorbidity in both cohorts and was consistently higher among melanoma patients. Melanoma and comorbidity interacted to increase the mortality rate. The highest proportional excess was seen in melanoma patients with comorbidity score 3, in whom interaction accounted for 77 deaths per 1000 person-years (40% of the total rate). We stratified by cancer stage and found that the interaction was markedly concentrated in patients with distant metastases.

Conclusion:

Interaction between melanoma and comorbidity was primarily concentrated in patients with distant metastases, which raises the possibility that comorbidity is associated with delay of melanoma diagnosis, advanced cancer stage, and less aggressive melanoma treatment.     

BRAFV600E protein expression and outcome from BRAF inhibitor treatment in BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma

Background:

To examine the association between level and patterns of baseline intra-tumoural BRAF^V600E protein expression and clinical outcome of BRAF^V600E melanoma patients treated with selective BRAF inhibitors.

Methods:

Fifty-eight BRAF^V600E metastatic melanoma patients treated with dabrafenib or vemurafenib on clinical trials had pre-treatment tumour BRAF^V600E protein expression immunohistochemically (IHC) assessed using the BRAF V600E mutant-specific antibody VE1. Sections were examined for staining intensity (score 1–3) and percentage of immunoreactive tumour cells, and from this an immunoreactive score (IRS) was derived (intensity × per cent positive/10). The presence of intra-tumoural heterogeneity for BRAF^V600E protein expression was also assessed. BRAF^V600E expression was correlated with RECIST response, time to best response (TTBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results:

Expression was generally high (median IRS 28 (range 5–30)) and homogeneous (78%). Expression of mutated protein BRAF^V600E as measured by intensity, per cent immunoreactive cells, or IRS did not correlate with RECIST response, TTBR, PFS or OS, including on multivariate analysis. Heterogeneity of staining was seen in 22% of cases and did not correlate with outcome.

Conclusion:

In the current study population, IHC-measured pre-treatment BRAF^V600E protein expression does not predict response or outcome to BRAF inhibitor therapy in BRAF^V600E metastatic melanoma patients.     

Low-dose inhalation of interleukin-2 bio-chemotherapy for the treatment of pulmonary metastases in melanoma patients

Background:

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma has shown remarkable durable responses. Systemic administration of IL-2 may cause severe side effects, whereas local administration is considered to be a safe alternative. The lungs are common sites of metastases in melanoma patients causing considerable respiratory problems. We sought to evaluate the potential antitumoral effect of a low-dose inhalative IL-2 (lh-IL-2) regimen for patients with melanoma lung metastases. In addition, we explored the prophylactic potential of Ih-IL-2 after surgical removal of lung metastases in a study carried out in an outpatient setting.

Methods:

Twenty patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage-IV (M1b and M1c) melanoma were enrolled in this study and treated with 3 × 3 million IU inhalative IL-2 q.d. together with monthly dacarbazine bolus injections. Five patients received lh-IL-2 after surgical resection of lung metastases to prevent recurrence of the disease (prophylaxis group, N=5). All other patients were enrolled in the treatment group (N=15). Clinical evaluations were carried out monthly and radiological follow-up was performed every third month.

Results:

Nine patients in the treatment group had a clinical benefit with partial regression (27%) or stable disease (33%). Four patients had progression of lung metastases (26.7%) and two patients were not evaluable (13.3%). In the prophylaxis group, none of the patients developed new lung metastases during lh-IL-2 therapy. The median follow-up period was 7.8 months in the treatment group and 25.7 months in the prophylaxis group. In the majority of patients, treatment was well tolerated.

Conclusions:

Low-dose IL-2 inhalation might offer an effective and safe treatment option for lung metastases in melanoma patients. In addition, lh-IL-2 may have a prophylactic potential to prevent recurrence in the lungs after pulmonary melanoma metastasectomy. Administration can easily be performed in an outpatient setting, thus offering an attractive treatment option.     

NY-ESO-1 antibody as a novel tumour marker of gastric cancer

Background:

NY-ESO-1 antibodies are specifically observed in patients with NY-ESO-1-expressing tumours. We analysed whether the NY-ESO-1 humoral immune response is a useful tumour marker of gastric cancer.

Methods:

Sera from 363 gastric cancer patients were screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect NY-ESO-1 antibodies. Serial serum samples were obtained from 25 NY-ESO-1 antibody-positive patients, including 16 patients with curative resection and 9 patients who received chemotherapy alone.

Results:

NY-ESO-1 antibodies were detected in 3.4% of stage I, 4.4% of stage II, 25.3% of stage III, and 20.0% of stage IV patients. The frequency of antibody positivity increased with disease progression. When the NY-ESO-1 antibody was used in combination with carcinoembryonic antigen and CA19-9 to detect gastric cancer, information gains of 11.2% in stages III and IV, and 5.8% in all patients were observed. The NY-ESO-1 immune response levels of the patients without recurrence fell below the cutoff level after surgery. Two of the patients with recurrence displayed incomplete decreases. The nine patients who received chemotherapy alone continued to display NY-ESO-1 immune responses.

Conclusion:

When combined with conventional tumour markers, the NY-ESO-1 humoral immune response could be a useful tumour marker for detecting advanced gastric cancer and inferring the post-treatment tumour load in seropositive patients.     

Phase I clinical trial of the Src inhibitor dasatinib with dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma

Background:

Src inhibitors sensitise melanoma cells to chemotherapy in preclinical models. The combination of dasatinib and dacarbazine was tested in a phase I trial in melanoma.

Methods:

Patients had ECOG performance status 0–2 and normal organ function. Dacarbazine was administered on day 1 and dasatinib on day 2 through 19 of each 21-day cycle. Both were escalated from 50 mg b.i.d. of dasatinib and 800 mg m⁻² of dacarbazine. Available pre-treatment biopsies were sequenced for BRAF, NRAS, and C-Kit mutations.

Results:

Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at dasatinib 70 mg b.i.d./dacarbazine 1000 mg m⁻², and was predominantly haematological. In 29 patients receiving dasatinib 70 mg b.i.d., the objective response rate (ORR) was 13.8%, the clinical benefit rate (ORR+SD) was 72.4%, the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 20.7%, and the 12-month overall survival (OS) was 34.5%. Two out of three patients who were wild type for BRAF, NRAS, and c-KIT mutations had confirmed partial responses, and one had a minor response.

Conclusion:

The recommended phase II dose is dasatinib70 mg b.i.d with dacarbazine 800 mg m⁻². PFS and OS data for dasatinib at 70 mg b.i.d. with dacarbazine compared favourably with historical controls. Preliminary data support evaluating tumour mutation status further as a biomarker of response.     

TERT promoter mutations in ocular melanoma distinguish between conjunctival and uveal tumours

Background:

Recently, activating mutations in the TERT promoter were identified in cutaneous melanoma. We tested a cohort of ocular melanoma samples for similar mutations.

Methods:

The TERT promoter region was analysed by Sanger sequencing in 47 uveal (ciliary body or choroidal) melanomas and 38 conjunctival melanomas.

Results:

Mutations of the TERT promoter were not identified in uveal melanomas, but were detected in 12 (32%) conjunctival melanomas. Mutations had a UV signature and were identical to those found in cutaneous melanoma.

Conclusion:

Mutations of TERT promoter with UV signatures are frequent in conjunctival melanomas and favour a pathogenetic kinship with cutaneous melanomas. Absence of these mutations in uveal melanomas emphasises their genetic distinction from cutaneous and conjunctival melanomas.     

Targeting pancreatic and ovarian carcinomas using the auristatin-based anti-CD70 antibody–drug conjugate SGN-75

Background:

CD70 is an ideal target for antibody-based therapies because of its aberrant high expression in renal carcinomas and non-Hodgkin lymphomas and its highly restricted expression in normal tissues. The expression profiling of CD70 in carcinomas has been limited because of the lack of a CD70-specific reagent that works in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues.

Methods:

We generated murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for CD70 and validated their specificity by western blot analysis and developed a protocol for immunohistochemistry on FFPE tissues. CD70+ tumour cell lines were used for testing the anti-tumour activity of the anti-CD70 antibody–drug conjugate, SGN-75.

Results:

We report novel detection of CD70 expression in multiple cancers including pancreatic (25%), larynx/pharynx (22%), melanoma (16%), ovarian (15%), lung (10%), and colon (9%). Our results show that pancreatic and ovarian tumour cell lines, which express high levels of endogenous or transfected CD70, are sensitive to the anti-tumour activity of SGN-75 in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusion:

Development of murine mAbs for robust and extensive screening of FFPE samples coupled with the detection of anti-tumour activity in novel indications provide rationale for expanding the application of SGN-75 for the treatment of multiple CD70 expressing cancers.     

Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial

Background:

The SHIVA trial is a multicentric randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with any type of refractory cancer. Results of the feasibility study on the first 100 enrolled patients are presented.

Methods:

Adult patients with any type of metastatic cancer who failed standard therapy were eligible for the study. The molecular profile was performed on a mandatory biopsy, and included mutations and gene copy number alteration analyses using high-throughput technologies, as well as the determination of oestrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results:

Biopsy was safely performed in 95 of the first 100 included patients. Median time between the biopsy and the therapeutic decision taken during a weekly molecular biology board was 26 days. Mutations, gene copy number alterations, and IHC analyses were successful in 63 (66%), 65 (68%), and 87 (92%) patients, respectively. A druggable molecular abnormality was present in 38 patients (40%).

Conclusions:

The establishment of a comprehensive tumour molecular profile was safe, feasible, and compatible with clinical practice in refractory cancer patients.     

Brain metastasis in renal cancer patients: metastatic pattern,tumour-associated macrophages and chemokine/chemoreceptor expression

Background:

The mechanisms of brain metastasis in renal cell cancer (RCC) patients are poorly understood. Chemokine and chemokine receptor expression may contribute to the predilection of RCC for brain metastasis by recruitment of monocytes/macrophages and by control or induction of vascular permeability of the blood–brain barrier.

Methods:

Frequency and patterns of brain metastasis were determined in 246 patients with metastatic RCC at autopsy. Expression of CXCR4, CCL7 (MCP-3), CCR2 and CD68⁺ tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) were analysed in a separate series of 333 primary RCC and in 48 brain metastases using immunohistochemistry.

Results:

Fifteen percent of 246 patients with metastasising RCC had brain metastasis. High CXCR4 expression levels were found in primary RCC and brain metastases (85.7% and 91.7%, respectively). CCR2 (52.1%) and CCL7 expression (75%) in cancer cells of brain metastases was more frequent compared with primary tumours (15.5% and 16.7%, respectively; P<0.0001 each). The density of CD68⁺ TAMs was similar in primary RCC and brain metastases. However, TAMs were more frequently CCR2-positive in brain metastases than in primary RCC (P<0.001).

Conclusion:

Our data demonstrate that the monocyte-specific chemokine CCL7 and its receptor CCR2 are expressed in tumour cells of RCC. We conclude that monocyte recruitment by CCR2 contributes to brain metastasis of RCC.     

Frequent MED12 mutations in phyllodes tumours of the breast

Background:

Phyllodes tumours are rare fibroepithelial tumours of the breast, that include benign, borderline, and malignant lesions. Although the molecular basis of phyllodes tumours largely remains unknown, a recent exome study identified MED12 mutations as a sole recurrent genetic alteration in fibroadenoma, a common benign fibroepithelial tumour that shares some histological features with the phyllodes tumour.

Methods:

Forty-six phyllodes tumours and 58 fibroadenomas of the breast were analysed for MED12 mutations by using Sanger sequencing.

Results:

MED12 mutations were identified in 37 out of the 46 phyllodes tumours (80%). The prevalence of MED12 mutations was similar among benign (15/18, 83%), borderline (12/15, 80%), and malignant tumours (10/13, 77%). MED12 mutations were also identified in 36 of the 58 fibroadenomas (62%). The mutations were frequent among intracanalicular-type (24/32, 75%) and complex-type lesions (4/6, 67%), but were significantly less common among the pericanalicular-type lesions (8/20, 40%). A microdissection-based analysis showed that MED12 mutations were confined to the stromal components in both phyllodes tumours and fibroadenomas.

Conclusions:

MED12 mutations were frequent among the phyllodes tumours of the breast, regardless of the tumour grade. Phyllodes tumours and fibroadenomas share, at least in part, a common genetic background.