Revisional bariatric surgery in a transplant patient

IntroductionA BMI of over 35–45 kg/m2 is deemed the upper limit for considering a patient for a renal transplant. Voluntary weight loss attempts are a major concern for patients while on hemodialysis, however, bariatric surgeries have opened up a new door to notable weight loss results, even demonstrating significant improvements of patients’ diabetic profile and hypertension.Case reportCase of a 52-year-old male with a BMI of 42 in end-stage renal disease, that needed a kidney transplant but was ineligible to be placed on the waiting list due to his weight. A laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was performed to aid with his weight loss. He also showed major improvements in his hypertension and diabetes profiles. The patient started gaining weight as well as showing deterioration in his diabetic control. He underwent the renal transplant 1.5 years post LSG, after which he showed improvements in his blood results, diabetic and hypertensive control. However, his weight began to increase again, for which he underwent gastric bypass. Since then, the patients' glucose, BUN and creatinine have normalized and his weight continued to drop, reaching a BMI of 31.83 kg/m2 2 years post bypass.ConclusionBariatric surgery is a safe and effective procedure to assist renal transplant patients in losing weight. In addition, it has proven to be effective in the management of the co-morbidities that are associated with renal failure. Our study was also able to prove that converting form an SG to a bypass in a transplant patient is a safe and feasible option.     

Treatment of liver failure post one anastomosis gastric bypass by revising to normal anatomy: A case report

IntroductionObesity and the associated metabolic syndrome are global health problems. Significant weight loss after bariatric surgery can cause a substantial difference in those comorbidities in obese patients. In this case, we described a rare complication of a patient who developed acute liver failure after an uneventful one anastomosis gastric bypass treated conservatively and revision of the one anastomosis gastric bypass to normal anatomy.Case presentationWe present a 52-year-old female known to have hypothyroidism and morbid obesity with a BMI of 45. For that, she underwent uneventful one anastomosis gastric bypass. Later, she developed liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy, which was managed conservatively and revision surgery to normal anatomy.DiscussionBariatric surgery plays an integral role in treating obese patients for its associated impacts, like facilitating weight loss and related metabolic syndrome improvement. The effects of bariatric surgery on liver functioning are controversial. Some malabsorptive procedures are linked to postoperative hepatic complications. However, it is uncommon in a recent new technique in bariatric surgery. Liver transplant and revision of the bariatric surgery have been described as management. However, optimal nutrition support without a liver transplant along with revision surgery is possible in experienced hands.ConclusionEarly detection of liver impairment and early intervention by a revision to normal anatomy by an experienced surgeon is considered the safest and most effective procedure for such patients. However, late detection where liver failure occurs, liver transplantation is the only effective treatment for preventing fatal outcomes.     

Incidentally discovered intestinal nonrotation at time of bariatric surgery: Which operation to perform?

BackgroundAn incidental finding of intestinal nonrotation at the time of bariatric surgery poses the following 2 dilemmas: (1) which operation to perform, and (2) whether an appendectomy should be performed concurrently.ObjectivesTo review the experience of 2 Bariatric Centers of Excellence with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with intestinal nonrotation, and to perform a systematic review of the literature on this topic.SettingTwo Bariatric Centers of Excellence as designated by the Ontario Bariatric Network.MethodsA chart review of all LSG cases performed in patients with intestinal nonrotation at 2 centers was performed. A systematic review on performing bariatric surgery in patients with intestinal nonrotation/malrotation was conducted using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases.ResultsFour patients (.4% of all cases) underwent LSG in the setting of intestinal nonrotation. Two patients underwent a concurrent appendectomy. Three patients developed postoperative gastrointestinal reflux disease and 1 patient required conversion to a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A total of 12 retrospective studies with 23 patients were included in the systematic review. Nineteen patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 3 patients underwent a duodenal switch, and 1 patient underwent LSG. Nine patients (41%) underwent a concurrent appendectomy. Reasons cited for not performing an appendectomy include not completely understanding the anatomic defect, being surprised by the discovery of nonrotation, no consent for the procedure, and suboptimal trocar placement for an appendectomy.ConclusionsLSG is a reasonable alternative to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with intestinal nonrotation. A concurrent appendectomy may not be necessary in the era of modern cross-sectional imaging for diagnosing acute appendicitis.     

Five-year results after resleeve gastrectomy

BackgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become increasingly popular in bariatric surgery. However, in the long-term follow-up, weight loss failure and intractable severe acid reflux after primary LSG can necessitate further interventions.ObjectivesThe aim of our study was to evaluate long-term results 5 years after resleeve gastrectomy (ReSG).SettingPrivate hospital, France.MethodsThe study included all patients with failure after LSG who underwent ReSG between October 2008 and January 2014. The patients underwent radiologic evaluation, and an algorithm of treatment was proposed. We analyzed the 5-year outcomes concerning weight loss and long-term complications after ReSG.ResultsA total of 52 patients (46 women; mean age 40.2 yr) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 39.4 kg/m² underwent ReSG. The mean interval time from the primary LSG to ReSG was of 27.8 months (11–72 mo). The indication for ReSG was inadequate weight loss (28 patients; 53.8%), weight regain (22 patients; 42.3%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (2 patients; 3.8%). In 35 cases the contrast agent (diatrizoate meglumine/diatrizoate sodium solution [Gastrografin]) swallow results were interpreted as primary dilation and in the remaining 17 cases as secondary dilation. One patient died from gynecologic cancer. Of the remainder, 3 patients underwent single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass, 5 patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and 1 patient underwent a second ReSG for reflux. A total of 39 of 42 patients with ReSG as definitive procedure had available data at 5-year follow-up. The mean percentage of excess BMI loss was 63.7%. Of the 39 patients, 28 (71.8%) had >50% excess BMI loss at 5 years. Eight of the 11 patients with weight loss failure (<50% excess BMI loss) after ReSG were diagnosed with secondary or diffuse dilation on preoperative imaging; the remaining 3 patients had been operated in our early initial experience with the resleeve procedure. All cases were completed by laparoscopy with no intraoperative incidents. In terms of complications, we recorded 1 leak, 2 stenoses, and 2 cases of bleeding with no mortality.ConclusionsAt 5 years postoperative, the ReSG as a definitive bariatric procedure remained effective for 53.8%. The results appear to be more favorable especially for the non–super-obese patients and for those with primary dilation. ReSG is a well-tolerated bariatric procedure with a low long-term complication rate. Further prospective clinical trials are required to compare the outcomes of ReSG with those of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass for weight loss failure after LSG.     

Kidney After Intestinal Transplantation Using Two Different Living Donors: A First Case Report

We describe a unique case of a 53-year-old woman who underwent a nonrelated living donor kidney transplant 9 years after a previous small bowel transplant from her sister. The patient had suffered from short bowel syndrome secondary to volvulus after undergoing bariatric surgery for morbid obesity. Her entire small bowel had to be resected emergently, but she also developed acute kidney failure at the time. This initial kidney injury associated with long-term exposure to calcineurin-inhibitor medication eventually led to end-stage renal disease. A successful kidney transplant from a different, nonrelated adult donor was performed. Of note, the unrelated kidney donor matched exactly the 2 HLA-A and HLA-B antigens that the recipient had not matched with her sister. We discuss the unique HLA configuration between the patient and her 2 living donors, the absence of posttransplant rejection and posttransplant immunosuppressive therapy. To our knowledge this is the first published report of a successful kidney after a previous bowel transplant using (2 different) living donors.     

Bariatric surgery prior to living donor nephrectomy: a solution to expand the living donor kidney pool – a retrospective study

Most transplant centers decline morbidly obese people for living kidney donation. Their inclusion in the living donor pool after weight loss and reversal of comorbidities by bariatric surgery could reverse the downward living donation trend. We investigated whether bariatric surgery in the morbidly obese altered their candidacy for donation, complicated their subsequent donor nephrectomy, and impacted their early postoperative outcomes in a series of 22 donors who had bariatric surgery 0.7–22 years prior to laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Eighteen would have been excluded from donation prior to bariatric surgery based on a body mass index (BMI) > 40. Seventeen reached a BMI < 35 after bariatric surgery. One had hypertension that resolved after bariatric surgery. Prior bariatric surgery did not influence port placement and laterality of donor nephrectomy. None required open conversion or blood transfusion. In an exploratory comparison with 37 donors with a BMI 35–40, length of stay and warm ischemic time were shorter, blood loss and postoperative complications were similar, and operative time was longer. We therefore advocate the consideration of bariatric surgery in preparation for donation in morbidly obese people since it positively alters their candidacy without major impact on the subsequent living donor nephrectomy and early outcomes.     

Obesity and bariatric surgery in kidney transplantation: A clinical review

Obesity is increasing worldwide, and this has major implications in the setting of kidney transplantation. Patients with obesity may have limited access to transplantation and increased posttransplant morbidity and mortality. Most transplant centers incorporate interventions aiming to target obesity in kidney transplant candidates, including dietary education and lifestyle modifications. For those failing nutritional restriction and medical therapy, the use of bariatric surgery may increase the transplant candidacy of patients with obesity and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and may potentially improve the immediate and late outcomes. Bariatric surgery in ESRD patients is associated with weight loss ranging from 29.8% to 72.8% excess weight loss, with reported mortality and morbidity rates of 2% and 7%, respectively. The most commonly performed bariatric surgical procedures in patients with ESRD and in transplant patients are laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. However, the correct timing of bariatric surgery and the ideal type of surgery have yet to be determined, although pretransplant LSG seems to be associated with an acceptable risk-benefit profile. We review the impact of obesity on kidney transplant candidates and recipients and in potential living kidney donors, exploring the potential impact of bariatric surgery in addressing obesity in these populations, thereby potentially improving posttransplant outcomes.     

Obstructive sleep apnea remission following bariatric surgery: a national registry cohort study

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is strongly associated with metabolic syndrome. Bariatric surgery is an effective available treatment for OSA; however, limited research predicts which patients undergoing bariatric surgery will undergo OSA resolution.ObjectivesTo determine perioperative predictors for OSA resolution following bariatric surgery using a national database.SettingUnited Kingdom national bariatric surgery database.MethodsThe UK National Bariatric Surgery Registry (NBSR) was interrogated to identify all patients with OSA that underwent primary bariatric surgery between January 2009 and June 2017. Those with at least 1 follow-up recording postoperative OSA status were selected for further analysis. Demographic, pre- and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Poisson multivariate regression was conducted to identify predictors of OSA remission.ResultsA total of 4015 bariatric cases were eligible for inclusion: 2482 (61.8%) patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), 1196 (29.8%) sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and 337 (8.4%) adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Overall, the mean excess weight loss (EWL) % for the whole group was 61.2 (SD ± 27.2). OSA resolution was recorded in 2377 (59.2%) patients. Following Poisson regression, LRYGB (risk ratio [RR], 1.49 confidence interval [CI] 1.25–1.78) and LSG (RR, 1.46 [CI 1.22–1.75] were associated with approximately 50% increased likelihood of OSA remission compared with LAGB. Greater weight loss following intervention was associated with greater likelihood of OSA remission, while both greater age and greater preoperative body mass index (BMI) were associated with reduced likelihood of OSA remission (P < .001).ConclusionThis study demonstrated that metabolic surgery results in OSA remission in the majority of patients with obesity. Younger age, lower BMI preprocedure, greater %EWL and the use of LSG or LRYGB positively predicted OSA remission.     

Evolution and Outcomes of a Canadian Pediatric Bariatric Surgery Program

PurposeAn interdisciplinary obesity management program was established in 2007 at our quaternary hospital, including bariatric surgery for selected adolescent patients. We report the evolution of surgical management within the program and outcomes following bariatric surgery.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of adolescents who underwent bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2017. All cases were performed by a pediatric surgeon and an adult bariatric surgeon. Baseline demographics, BMI, co-morbidities, and post-operative outcomes were recorded.ResultsThirty-eight patients underwent bariatric surgery. Median age at entrance into the program was 16.5 (range, 12.1–17.4) years and at time of surgery was 17.4 (range, 13.6–18.8) years. Eight patients had laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) from 2007 to 10. Between 2011 and 2017, 18 had laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and 12 had laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). There were no intraoperative complications or conversions. Postoperative complications included wound infection, bleeding requiring transfusion and re-exploration, and internal hernia. Of patients who had LAGB, 2 required surgical revision, and 3 underwent subsequent removal.ConclusionsAdolescent bariatric surgery in the context of a multidisciplinary obesity management program is safe and effective. RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy are associated with superior weight loss in the immediate post-operative period and at most recent follow-up and lower reoperation rates than gastric banding.Level of EvidenceIII.     

Gastric Pouch Carcinoma after Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity

The relationship between bariatric surgery and gastric cancer is conjectural. We present a 52-year-old woman with BMI 45 operated initially by a Lap-Band procedure complicated by gastric wall erosion of the band 9 months later. She was re-operated and the band was removed. She subsequently underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. 5 years after, gastric carcinoma was discovered in the gastric pouch. Because of varied symptoms following bariatric surgery, patients may not present promptly with symptoms related to a gastric carcinoma.     

Gastric Bypass in a Japanese Man with Prader-Willi Syndrome and Morbid Obesity

Background: In Prader-Willi syndrome (PrWS), marked obesity is the most serious and common complication, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Because of the associated psychosocial difficulties, bariatric surgery appears to be the only effective treatment. Case Report: A 30-year-old man with PrWS weighing 108 kg (BMI 50 kg/m²), underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). 3 months before the RYGBP, he weighed 146 kg (BMI 68.5), partly because of heart failure. 18 months after RYGBP, he weighed 92.4 kg (BMI 43.3), with no postoperative complications. Moreover, he showed considerable increase in serum HDL-cholesterol levels with reciprocal reduction in LDL-cholesterol after the surgery. Conclusion: RYGBP resulted in satisfactory weight loss and improvement in serum lipid profile in a Japanese morbidly obese patient with PrWS.     

A Meta-analysis of 2-Year Effect After Surgery: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus

Literature search was performed for bariatric surgery from inception to September 2013, in which the effects of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%), and diabetes mellitus (DM) were compared 2 years post-surgery. A total of 9,756 cases of bariatric surgery from 16 studies were analyzed. Patients receiving LRYGB had significantly lower BMI and higher EWL% compared with those receiving LSG (BMI mean difference (MD)?=??1.38, 95 % confidence interval (CI)?=??1.72 to ?1.03; EWL% MD?=?5.06, 95 % CI?=?0.24 to 9.89). Improvement rate of DM was of no difference between the two types of bariatric surgeries (RR?=?1.05, 95 % CI?=?0.90 to 1.23). LRYGB had better long-term effect on body weight, while both LRYGB and LSG showed similar effects on DM.     

减肥手术对骨密度的影响

目的通过双能X线吸收测定法(DXA)测量超重或肥胖患者的骨密度,对比分析减肥手术前后骨密度的改变情况。方法根据入选标准及排除标准纳入需要进行减肥手术治疗的超重或肥胖患者,手术前检测基线观察指标,其中包括简易人体测量参数、骨密度。然后,对纳入的患者行腹腔镜下胃旁路术或腹腔镜下袖状胃切除术,术后4~6月复查基线观察指标,重点对比分析减肥手术前后骨密度的改变情况。结果 1减肥手术后,体重、BMI、腰围均明显减少,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。2减肥术后全身骨密度及髋部骨密度均有降低(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜下胃旁路术及腹腔镜下袖状胃切除术都是有效的减肥术式,骨密度有不同程度的降低,术后应注意骨密度的维护。     

Bariatric surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis

BackgroundData regarding the management of bariatric patients with cirrhosis are scarce, and there is no strong evidence that supports a specific approach for this group of patients. The aim of this study was to review our experience with cirrhotic patients undergoing bariatric surgery.MethodsA prospectively maintained database was reviewed to assess the outcomes of bariatric surgery for patients with known cirrhosis and for patients with cirrhosis discovered at surgery (unknown cirrhosis).ResultsFrom April 2004 to September 2011, 23 patients (12 with known cirrhosis and 11 with unknown cirrhosis) met inclusion criteria. There were 14 females and 9 males with a mean age of 51.5±8.3 and a mean body mass index of 48.2±8.6 kg/m2. Child-Pugh classes were A (n = 22) and B (n = 1). Patients had a high frequency of diabetes (83%), dyslipidemia (61%), and hypertension (83%). Procedures performed were laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) (n = 14), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) (n = 8), and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (n = 1). Two patients underwent LSG successfully after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Mean length of hospital stay was 4.3±2.7 days. Complications developed in 8 patients. One patient died of unknown cause 9 months after surgery. No patients had liver decompensation after surgery. The patients lost 67.4%±30.9% of their excess weight at 12 months follow-up and 67.7%±24.8% at 37 months follow-up.ConclusionLRYGB and LSG can be performed without prohibitive complication rates in carefully selected patients with cirrhosis. In our experience, bariatric patients with cirrhosis achieved excellent weight loss and improvement in obesity-related co-morbidities.     

Assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting after bariatric surgery using a validated questionnaire

BackgroundPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is known to occur after bariatric surgery, with over two thirds of patients affected. However, variability exists in how to objectively measure PONV.ObjectivesThe goals of the present study were to use a validated, patient-centered scoring tool, the Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching to measure the severity of PONV after bariatric surgery, to directly compare PONV between patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), and to identify risk factors for the development of PONV after bariatric surgery.SettingBarnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.MethodsThe Washington University Weight Loss Surgery team prospectively surveyed patients from January 1, 2017 to December 1, 2018 at the following 6 different timepoints: postoperative day (POD) 0, POD 1, POD 2, POD 3 to 4, the first postoperative outpatient visit (POV 1: POD 5–25), and the second postoperative visit (POV 2: POD 25–50). At each timepoint, a cumulative Rhodes score was calculated from the sum of 8 questions. The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database was used to collect patient demographic characteristics and perioperative clinical data.ResultsA total of 274 patients met study criteria and completed 605 Rhodes questionnaires. Two hundred fifty Rhodes questionnaires were completed by patients after SG and 355 were completed by patients after LRYGB. Total Rhodes scores are statistically higher in LSG patients compared with patients who underwent LRYGB (LSG = 5.45 ± 6.27; LRYGB = 3.08 ± 4.19, P = .0002). Additionally, at the earlier timepoints, scores were higher among patients who underwent LSG than those who had undergone LRYGB as follows: POD 0 (LSG = 6.96 ± 6.50; LRYGB = 2.89 ± 2.90, P = .0115), POD 1 (LSG = 8.20 ± 6.76; LRYGB = 2.88 ± 3.44, P < .0001), and POD 2 (LSG = 4.05 ± 4.88; LRYGB = 2.06 ± 3.43, P = .05). On subset analysis, examining patients who either underwent an LSG or LRYGB, both procedures had a statistically significant PONV peak emerge on POV 2. Last, overall Rhodes scores were statistically higher in female patients compared with male patients (female: 4.43 ± 5.46; male: 2.35 ± 3.90, P = .021). Although the magnitude of the difference varied somewhat across POD time intervals, the difference was most pronounced at POV 2.ConclusionsThis is the largest study using a validated nausea and vomiting questionnaire to objectively measure PONV after bariatric surgery. The factors found to be most associated with increased PONV were LSG and female sex. Ultimately, these data can help bariatric surgery programs, including Washington University Weight Loss Surgery, identify patients who may require more intensive treatment of PONV, particularly POD 0 to 2, and help to identify patients that continue to struggle with PONV in the later surgical recovery phase.     

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as an Initial Bariatric Operation for High-Risk Patients: Initial Results in 10 Patients

Background: The outcomes and initial results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were evaluated. Methods: A prospective study of the initial 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was performed. Study endpoints included operative time, complication rates, hospital length of stay and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL). Results: There were 5 women and 5 men, with mean age 43 years (range 31 to 52). Mean preoperative weight was 182 kg (range 125-247 kg), with mean preoperative BMI 64 (range 61-80). Indication for LSG was related to BMI in all patients. 1 patient had previous restrictive bariatric surgery. Mean operative time was 2 hours (range 1.5-2.5). No patient required conversion. There were no postoperative complications nor mortality. Median hospital stay was 7.2 days. Average %EWL and BMI at 1 year were 51% and 23 kg/m², respectively. Conclusion: LSG can be safely integrated into a bariatric surgical program with good results in terms of weight loss and quality of life. LSG can be a firststage procedure before gastric bypass or duodenal switch or a one-stage restrictive procedure if longterm results are good. LSG should be considered as a surgical option in the bariatric field.     

Bariatric surgery in the elderly: a randomized prospective study comparing safety of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (BASE Trial)

BackgroundThe aging population along with the obesity epidemic has increased the number of older patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Nevertheless, there is still conflicting data regarding surgical safety in this population.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the surgical morbidity of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for older patients.SettingUniversity hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.MethodsWe performed a prospective randomized clinical trial from September 2017 to May 2019. Obese patients aged ≥65 years were randomized to LSG or LRYGB. Data collection included demographic information, body mass index (BMI), and co-morbidities. We assessed readmission, postoperative complications, and mortality. Complications were scored according to Clavien-Dindo classification.ResultsA total of 36 patients, with a BMI between 35.5 and 52.8 kg/m² were randomized to either LSG (18 patients) or LRYGB (18 patients). The overall complication rate was similar between LSG and LRYGB (3 versus 7, P = .13). Severe complication was more prevalent in LRYGB patients but had no statistically significant difference (0 versus 3, P = .07). Each group had 1 readmission and there was no mortality in 90-day follow-up.ConclusionsMorbidity and mortality rates of bariatric surgery are low in elderly obese patients. Despite not statistically significant, LSG had a lower rate of severe complications compared with LRYGB in this population setting.     

Prospective clinical cohort study: low incidence of Barrett esophagus but high rate of reflux disease at 5-year follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease seems more frequent after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Retrospective case series have raised concerns about a high incidence of Barrett esophagus (BE) after LSG.ObjectiveThis prospective clinical cohort study compared the incidence of BE ≥5 years after LSG and LRYGB.SettingSt. Clara Hospital, Basel, and University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.MethodsPatients were recruited from 2 bariatric centers where preoperative gastroscopy is standard practice and LRYGB is preferred for patients with preexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease. At follow-up ≥5 years after surgery, patients underwent gastroscopy with quadrantic biopsies from the squamocolumnar junction and metaplastic segment. Symptoms were assessed using validated questionnaires. Wireless pH measurement assessed esophageal acid exposure.ResultsA total of 169 patients were included, with a median 7.0 ± 1.5 years after surgery. In the LSG group (n = 83), 3 patients had endoscopically and histologically confirmed de novo BE; in the LRYGB group (n = 86), there were 2 patients with BE, 1 de novo and 1 preexisting (de novo BE, 3.6% versus 1.2%; P = .362). At follow-up, reflux symptoms were reported more frequently by the LSG group than by the LRYGB group (51.9% versus 10.5%). Similarly, moderate-to-severe reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles grade B–D) was more common (27.7% versus 5.8%) despite greater use of proton pump inhibitors (49.4% versus 19.7%), and pathologic acid exposure was more frequent in patients who underwent LSG than in patients who underwent LRYGB.ConclusionsAfter at least 5 years of follow-up, a higher incidence of reflux symptoms, reflux esophagitis, and pathologic esophageal acid exposure was found in patients who underwent LSG compared with patients who underwent LRYGB. However, the incidence of BE after LSG was low and not significantly different between the 2 groups.     

Comparative analysis of the single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 2-year postoperative data illustrating weight loss,type 2 diabetes,and nutritional status in a single US center

BackgroundThe sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with SG (SADI-S) are recognized bariatric procedures. A comparison has never been made between these 3 procedures and especially in different body mass index (BMI) categories.ObjectiveThe study aimed to analyze a large cohort of patients undergoing either laparoscopic (L) SG, LRYGB, or LSADI-S to evaluate and compare weight loss and glycosylated hemoglobin level. The secondary aim was to compare the nutritional outcomes between LRYGB and LSADI-S.SettingPrivate practice, United States.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of 878 patients who underwent LSG, LRYGB, or LSADI-S from April 2014 through October 2015 by 5 surgeons in a single institution. For weight loss analysis, the patients were categorized into 4 different categories as follows: patients regardless of their preoperative BMI, patients with preoperative BMI <45 kg/m², patients with preoperative BMI 45 to 55 kg/m², and patients with preoperative BMI >55 kg/m².ResultsA total of 878 patients were identified for analysis. Of 878 patients, 448 patients, 270 patients, and 160 patients underwent LSG, LRYGB, and LSADI-S, respectively. Overall, at 12 and 24 months, the weight loss was highest with LSADI-S, followed by LRYGB and LSG in all 4 categories. At 2 years, the patients lost 19.5, 16.1, and 11.3 BMI points after LSADI-S, LRYGB, and LSG, respectively. In addition, the weight loss was highest in patients with preoperative BMI <45 kg/m² and lowest in patients with preoperative BMI >55 kg/m² at 12 and 24 months. Also, there were no statistically significant differences between the nutritional outcomes between LRYGB and LSADI-S. The LSADI-S had significantly lower rates of abnormal glycosylated hemoglobin than LRYGB and LSG at 12 months (P < .001).ConclusionsThe weight loss outcomes and glycosylated hemoglobin rates were better with LSADI-S than LRYGB or LSG. The nutritional outcomes between LRYGB and LSADI-S were similar.     

Outcome of Portal Injuries Following Bariatric Operations

Background: Portal vein thrombosis is rare following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Its natural history is dependent on the etiology of the thrombosis. Iatrogenic injuries at bariatric operations resulting in portal vein thrombosis are lethal complications typically necessitating a liver transplant, whereas postoperative portal vein thrombosis without an injury to the portal vein has a benign course. There are currently no data on management or prognostic factors of portal vein thrombosis after bariatric operations. Methods: 3 patients referred for liver transplantation secondary to portal vein injury following bariatric surgery between 2000 and 2003 are presented. Results: 2 super-obese (BMI ≥50 kg/m²) and 1 morbidly obese (BMI 44 kg/m²) patients sustained portal vein injuries during bariatric surgery (RYGBP 2, VBG 1) by experienced bariatric surgeons. In each case, the portal injury was identified and repaired. Thrombosis followed reconstruction in all 3 patients. All 3 underwent emergency liver transplantation, but died of sepsis and multi-organ failure following transplantation. Review of the literature found no cases of traumatic portal vein injuries following bariatric operations and 2 cases of postoperative portal vein thrombosis: 1 following LRYGBP (BMI 46) and one after a Lap-Band (BMI 41). Conclusion: Injury to the portal vein resulting from difficulty in discerning the anatomy of the intra-abdominal structures in the morbidly obese, is a lethal complication of bariatric surgery. Super-obese patients submitting to bariatic surgery should lose weight, undergo a two-stage bariatric procedure, or undergo laparoscopic RYGBP to minimize the risk of portal injury. Postoperative portal vein thrombosis has a benign course and can be managed conservatively.