Organ donation and utilization in the USA

The processes leading to donor identification, consent, organ procurement, and allocation continue to dominate debates and efforts in the field of transplantation. A considerable shortage of donors remains while the number of patients needing organ transplantation increases.
This article reviews the main trends in organ donation practices and procurement patterns from both deceased and living sources in the USA. Although there have been increases in living donation in recent years, 2002 witnessed a much more modest growth of 1%. Absolute declines in living liver and lung donation were also noted in 2002.
In 2002, the number of deceased donors increased by only 1.6% (101 donors). Increased donation from deceased donors provides more organs for transplantation than a comparable increase in living donation, because on average 3.6 organs are recovered from each deceased donor. The total number of organs recovered from deceased donors increased by 2.1% (462 organs). Poor organ quality continued to be the major reason given for nonrecovery of consented organs from deceased donors.
The kidney is the organ most likely to be discarded after recovery. Over the past decade the discard rate of recovered kidneys has increased from 6% to 11%. Many of these are expanded criteria donor kidneys.     

Organ retrieval and preservation

The success of organ transplantation can be attributed to many factors, but ultimately depends upon retrieval and preservation techniques to maintain the quality of an organ. Thoracic and abdominal organs from deceased donors are retrieved during a multi-organ procedure. The organs are flushed and cooled in situ with preservation solution followed by dissection and removal. With the high risk donors such as donation after circulatory death, rapid in situ cooling is essential to minimize the injury.     

A Registry Analysis of Damage to the Deceased Donor Pancreas During Procurement

Surgical injury to the pancreas is thought to occur commonly during procurement. The UK Transplant Registry was analyzed to determine the frequency of pancreatic injuries, identify factors associated with damage, and assess the impact of injuries on graft survival. Twelve hundred ninety‐six pancreata were procured from donation after brain death donors, with 314 (19.5%) from donation after circulatory death donors. More than 50% of recovered pancreata had at least one injury, most commonly a short portal vein (21.5%). Liver donation, procurement team origin, hepatic artery (HA) arising from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and increasing donor BMI were associated with increased rates of pancreas damage on univariate analyses; on multivariate analysis only the presence of an HA from the SMA remained significant (p = 0.02). Six hundred forty solid organ pancreas transplants were performed; 238 had some form of damage. Overall, there was no difference in graft survival between damaged and undamaged organs (p = 0.28); however, graft loss was significantly more frequent in pancreata with arterial damage (p = 0.04) and in those with parenchymal damage (p = 0.05). Damage to the pancreas during organ recovery is more common than other organs, and meticulous surgical technique and awareness of damage risk factors are essential to reduce rates of procurement‐related injuries.     

Changing Metrics of Organ Procurement Organization Performance in Order to Increase Organ Donation Rates in the United States

The shortage of deceased‐donor organs is compounded by donation metrics that fail to account for the total pool of possible donors, leading to ambiguous donor statistics. We sought to assess potential metrics of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) utilizing data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2009–2012 and State Inpatient Databases (SIDs) from 2008–2014. A possible donor was defined as a ventilated inpatient death ≤75 years of age, without multi‐organ system failure, sepsis, or cancer, whose cause of death was consistent with organ donation. These estimates were compared to patient‐level data from chart review from two large OPOs. Among 2,907,658 inpatient deaths from 2009–2012, 96,028 (3.3%) were a “possible deceased‐organ donor.” The two proposed metrics of OPO performance were: (1) donation percentage (percentage of possible deceased‐donors who become actual donors; range: 20.0–57.0%); and (2) organs transplanted per possible donor (range: 0.52–1.74). These metrics allow for comparisons of OPO performance and geographic‐level donation rates, and identify areas in greatest need of interventions to improve donation rates. We demonstrate that administrative data can be used to identify possible deceased donors in the US and could be a data source for CMS to implement new OPO performance metrics in a standardized fashion.     

Organ donation from burn-injured patients—a national perspective

Background

There is a discrepancy between publically available data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database and perception of the incidence of mortally burn-injured patients serving as organ donors. In the last 5 y, a single burn center referred several patients who went on to successfully donate multiple organs. However, UNOS data indicate very few referrals of patients with burn injuries nationwide. This discrepancy in UNOS-reported occurrences versus institutional experience prompted this work.

Methods

UNOS data from 1988–2012 was examined for causes of death related to thermal injury, electrical injury, inhalation injury, or carbon monoxide poisoning. The National Burn Repository was examined for burn center death rates and patient characteristics of those with reported nonsurvivable burn injuries. Finally, a national survey queried the clinical experiences and educated opinions of burn center directors, transplant surgeons, and organ procurement organization (OPO) representatives regarding organ donation in the burn-injured population.

Results

Between 42% and 52% of those surveyed responded. Survey data indicate that at least 61 patients with burn-related injuries have served as organ donors in the past 5 y alone, versus 23 identified in 24 y of UNOS data. Survey data also indicate that inhalation injuries were the most common burn-related injuries seen before successful organ procurement. Kidneys were the most commonly donated organs, but all major organs and tissues were represented in the experiences of surgeon and organ procurement organization respondents. Up to 10% surgeon respondents believe that patients with burn injuries should not be referred for possible organ donation.

Conclusions

There are more organs donated by patients with mortal burn injuries than currently available UNOS data would suggest. Survey data suggest that these patients should be able to contribute successfully to the supply of organs needed by those on transplant waiting lists, but remain inconsistently recognized as such a resource. Knowledge about long-term organ and tissue viability from burn-injured patients is lacking, and should be the focus of future research.     

Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 2004

This article discusses issues directly related to the organ donation process, including donor consent, donor medical suitability, non-recovery of organs, organs recovered but not transplanted, expanded criteria donors (ECD), and donation after cardiac death (DCD). The findings and topics covered have important implications for how to evaluate and share best practices of organ donation as implemented by organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and major donor hospitals in the same donation service areas (DSAs). In 2002 and 2003, US hospitals referred more than one million deaths or imminent deaths to the OPOs of their DSA. Referrals increased by nearly 10% from 2002 to 2003 (1,022,280 to 1,121,392). Donor consents have increased by about 5% and the number of total deceased donors has risen from 6,187 to 6,455. Since multiple organs are recovered from most donors, this increase allowed more than 500 additional wait-listed candidates to receive an organ transplant than in the prior year. Non-traditional donor sources have experienced a large rate of increase; in 2003 the number of ECD kidney donors increased by 8% and the number of DCD donors increased by 43% , from 189 donors in year 2002 to 271 donors in 2003.     

Organ Donation and Utilization in the United States, 1996–2005

The success of clinical transplantation as a therapy for end-stage organ failure is limited by the availability of suitable organs for transplant. This article discusses continued efforts by the transplant community to collaboratively improve the organ supply. There were 7593 deceased organ donors in 2005. This represents an all-time high and a 6% increase over 2004. Increases were noted in deceased organ donation of all types of organs; notable is the increase in lung donation, which occurred in 17% of all deceased donors. The percentage of deceased donations that occurred following cardiac death has also reached a new high at 7%. The number of living donors decreased by 2%, from 7003 in 2004 to 6895 in 2005. This article discusses the continued efforts of the Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative and the Organ Transplantation Breakthrough Collaborative to support organ recovery and use and to encourage the expectation that for every deceased donor, all organs will be placed and transplanted.     

Future Lawyers Support Organ Donation and Transplantation

In 2016 the total number of solid organ transplantations in Poland was 1469; the number of patients on waiting lists was approximately 1600 every month, and demand for organs is increasing every year. Transplantation has achieved increasing support and acceptance among Polish people; however, there are still many ethical, moral, and legal barriers related to this form of treatment of end-stage organ failure.

Organ donation in Latin America

Recently in Latin America, there has been a strong influence of the "Spanish model" of organ procurement. In 2001, The "Punta Cana Group" was created by Latin American transplantation coordinators with the objective of registering and improving the system of donation and procurement. In many countries there is no universal financial support from the government for medical treatment, including dialysis and transplantation. In other countries there is complete financial support for all of the population, including immunosuppressive drugs. Practically all countries have transplantation laws that follow ethical concepts, such as brain death diagnosis criteria, forms of consent, criteria of allocation, and inhibition of commerce. The rate of potential donors notified in countries that perform transplantations with deceased donors varied from 6 to 47 per million population yearly (pmp/y); The rate of effective donors varied from 1 to 20 pmp. In 2004, the mean rate of effective donors in Latin America was 5.4 pmp. The family refusal rate for the donation of organs varied from 28% in Uruguay to 70% in Peru. In some countries, such as Puerto Rico, Uruguay, and Cuba, it was more than 15 pmp, whereas in others countries deceased donors were practically not used. The number of patients on the waiting list for solid organ transplants in 12 Latin American countries is 55,000. Although the donation rate has increased by 100% during the last 10 years, it is lower than that in Europe (15 pmm/y) or the United States (20 pmp/y).     

Kidney damage during organ recovery in donation after circulatory death donors: data from UK National Transplant Database

During the last 10 years, kidneys recovered/transplanted from donors after circulatory death (DCD) have significantly increased. To optimize their use, there has been an urgent need to minimize both warm and cold ischemia, which often necessitates more rapid removal. To compare the rates of kidney injury during procurement from DCD and donors after brain death (DBD) organ donors. A total of 13 260 kidney procurements were performed in the United Kingdom over a 10-year period (2000-2010). Injuries occurred in 903 procedures (7.1%). Twelve thousand three hundred seventy-two (93.3%) kidneys were recovered from DBD donors and 888 (6.7%) from DCD donors. The rates of kidney injury were significantly higher when recovered from DCD donors (11.4% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Capsular, ureteric and vascular injuries were all significantly more frequent (p = 0.002, p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Discard because of injury was more common after DCD donation (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated procurement injuries were significantly associated with DCD donors (p = 0.035) and increased donor age (<0.001) and donor body mass index (BMI; 0.001), donor male gender (p = 0.001) and no liver donation (0.009). We conclude that procurement from DCD donors leads to higher rates of injury to the kidney and are more likely to be discarded.     

Opinions and Attitudes of Medical Students About Organ Donation and Transplantation

Background

Although transplantation has gained more support and acceptance, there are still many ethical, moral, and legal barriers associated with this form of treatment. The demand for organs is higher than what can be accommodated. Current medical students are forming their views about transplantation.

A 10-year analysis of organ donation after cardiac death in the United States

BACKGROUND: The greatest challenge facing transplantation today is how to increase the number of organ donors. Patients with severe brain injury who are not brain-dead can donate organs after they are removed from a ventilator and allowed to die, termed donation after cardiac death (DCD). METHODS: We analyzed the database of all organs recovered from deceased donors in the United States from 1994 through 2003 to determine DCD trends in the United States. The database was obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). RESULTS: There were 57,681 deceased donors reported from 1994 through 2003. Of these, 1,177 were donors without a heartbeat (DWHB), 55,206 were brain dead donors, and 1,298 were unspecified donors. At least one organ was transplanted from 1010 of the 1177 DWHB. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) reported 0-212 DWHB accounting for up to 12.3 percent of deceased donors. There was a steady annual increase in the number of DWHB, but in 2003 there were still 19 of 59 OPOs that recovered no DWHB. A total of 2,231 organs were transplanted from the 1,177 DWHB donors, and another 665 organs were recovered for transplantation but not transplanted. The transplanted organs included 1,779 kidneys, 395 livers, 54 pancreata, 2 lungs, and 1 heart. Organs from DWHB can be successfully transplanted. CONCLUSIONS: Wider use of DWHB has the potential to greatly increase the number of organ transplants performed each year in the United States.     

Organ procurement from donors deceased from cardiac death: a single-center efficiency assessment

Organ donation after cardiac death has been used for kidney and liver procurement in France since 2006. Until recently, most teams relied on in situ cold perfusion to prepare the donor before organ retrieval. Our team has used since 2007 normothermic abdominal recirculation. While this technique is presumed to be more difficult to implement, it also ensures a lower rate of primary nonfunction when compared to in situ cold perfusion. We present the efficiency results of our organ donation after cardiac death program. After 3 years, we have been able to establish a program in which we use normothermic abdominal recirculation in 97% of donors after cardiac death. The yearly efficiency of this program is comparable to the national efficiency of organ procurement from conventional deceased donors in France.     

The pancreas allograft donor: current status,controversies, and challenges for the future

Fridell JA, Rogers J, Stratta RJ. The pancreas allograft donor: current status, controversies, and challenges for the future.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 433–449.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The pancreas allograft is a scarce resource that is currently underutilized. The selection of appropriate deceased donors for pancreas procurement is of paramount importance for minimizing technical failure and optimizing long‐term outcomes in pancreas transplantation. Despite the increasing demand for pancreas transplantation, increases in overall organ donation rates and the evolution of criteria that constitute an “acceptable” pancreas donor, the number of deceased donor pancreas transplants being performed in the United States has actually declined in recent years. Although there are many factors that must be considered during evaluation of the potential pancreas allograft donor to minimize morbidity and graft loss, it is evident that there are transplantable organs that are not used. In this review, deceased donor pancreas identification, management, selection, allocation, assessment, preservation, and the problem of pancreas underutilization will be discussed.     

Noneligible Donors as a Strategy to Decrease the Organ Shortage

Organ procurement organization (OPO) performance is generally evaluated by the number of organ procurement procedures divided by the number of eligible deaths (donation after brain death [DBD] donors aged <70 years), whereas the number of noneligible deaths (including donation after cardiac death donors and DBD donors aged >70 years) is not tracked. The present study aimed to investigate the variability in the proportion of noneligible liver donors by the 58 donor service areas (DSAs). Patients undergoing liver transplant (LT) between 2011 and 2015 were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file. LTs from noneligible and eligible donors were compared. The proportion of noneligible liver donors by DSA varied significantly, ranging from 0% to 19.6% of total liver grafts used. In transplant programs, the proportion of noneligible liver donors used ranged from 0% to 35.3%. On linear regression there was no correlation between match Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score for programs in a given DSA and proportion of noneligible donors used from the corresponding DSA (p = 0.14). Noneligible donors remain an underutilized resource in many OPOs. Policy changes to begin tracking noneligible donors and learning from OPOs that have high noneligible donor usage are potential strategies to increase awareness and pursuit of these organs.     

Donation after cardiac death has a minimal impact on thoracic organ recovery

BACKGROUND: Our organ procurement organization recently developed an aggressive donation after cardiac death program. Thoracic organs are rarely recovered from non-heart-beating donors. Therefore, there is concern that donation after cardiac death may affect the recovery of thoracic organs from donors not allowed to progress to brain death. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact of donation after cardiac death on the recovery of thoracic organs. METHODS: On the assumption that prolongation of care on all cases would result in a diagnosis of brain death. By retrospective chart review, all donations after cardiac death were evaluated for thoracic organ potential using the same standards that were used to evaluate brain-dead donors. RESULTS: During the study period there were 34 of 44 (77%) non-heart-beating donors qualified to donate abdominal organs only. Ten of 44 non-heart-beating donors (24%) qualified to potentially donate thoracic organs; the families of 4 of 10 of these donors insisted on the immediate withdrawal of life support, leaving only 6 donors with thoracic organ potential. All 6 of these donors qualified as potential heart donors and 3 as potential lung donors. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 97 organs were recovered and successfully transplanted from 44 non-heart-beating donors. If all the donors who qualified to donate thoracic organs progressed to brain death and if their thoracic organs were transplantable, then 6 additional hearts and 3 pairs of lungs may have been recovered. These data demonstrate that an aggressive donation after cardiac death program contributes significantly to the organ donor pool, with a minimal impact on potential thoracic organ recovery.     

Organ and Tissue Procurement From Non-residents Deceased in Poland: Guidelines for Transplant Coordinators

Due to increasing global mobility, the number of non-residents who are potential deceased organ donors is likely to increase as well. Since 2014, 14 deceased foreigners have been referred as potential organ donors in Poland. There are, however, no precise international agreements between Poland and other countries regulating this issue. The aim of this paper is to provide guidelines on this subject for transplant coordinators. While there are no differences in the algorithms of potential donor identification, death diagnosis, donor management, organ procurement and preservation, allocation, transportation and transplantation, and the medical evaluation of a foreigner as a potential organ donor may differ. In certain cases, the risk of tropical or endemic infections should be evaluated. The authorization of the procurement may differ as well—foreigners who are not listed in the Polish Electronic System for Registration of Population cannot be registered in Polish Central Registry of Objection. They may have also not expressed refusal or consent for donation due to different legal solutions in their home countries. The donor's family and the proper diplomatic representative must be involved in donation process in order to obtain authorization for organ donation, to acquire essential medical information about the donor, and to ensure the transparency of the process. The procurement of organs, tissues and cells from foreigners deceased in Poland may be performed provided that a proper donor qualification process is conducted, the deceased had not objected to donation, there is no objection on the part of the donor's family or the prosecutor (if required), and the donation and procurement are properly described in medical documentation.     

Organ donation rates in a neurosurgical intensive care unit

OBJECT: The number of patients waiting for organ transplantation continues to grow, while organs are donated by very few of the thousands of potential donors who die every year. The authors' neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) has worked closely with coordinators from the local organ procurement organization (OPO) for many years. In this study, the authors analyze donation rates in the NICU and discuss factors that may be important in maximizing these rates. METHODS: All referrals from the NICU to the OPO from 1996 to 1999 were analyzed. Of the 180 referrals, 98 patients were found to be medically suitable as potential donors. Another 15 patients died of hemodynamic collapse shortly after admission to the NICU. If one assumes that all 15 patients would have been suitable donors, the unsuccessful resuscitation rate becomes 15 (13.3%) of 113. Of the 98 eligible donors, consent was obtained and organs or tissue were recovered in 72, yielding a successful organ procurement rate of 73.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Close working relationships among physicians, nurses, and OPO coordinators can result in higher donation rates than have been reported previously. Aggressive resuscitation and stabilization of all patients, early identification of potential organ donors, prompt declaration of brain death, and attempts by the OPO coordinator to build rapport with families are all important factors that may increase donation rates. Because most organ donors have sustained catastrophic intracranial events, neurosurgeons are uniquely positioned to influence organ donation policies at their hospitals and thus to salvage some benefit from tragic cases of overwhelming brain injury.