Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes After Liver Transplantation Depending on the Length of Cold Ischemia Time

BackgroundCold ischemia time (CIT) is one of the most significant variables affecting graft survival after liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to identify other predictors of worse graft survival depending on the duration of cold ischemia.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included data of liver transplant recipients and donors in the period from 2014 to 2019. A total of 724 patients were analyzed after excluding retransplatations and urgent operations. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we identified CIT value which divides into 2 clinically different subgroups with respect to 5-year graft loss. Within those 2 subgroups, we performed Cox proportional hazard analysis with time to graft loss as endpoint.ResultsThe optimal cut-off point for CIT was identified as 496 minutes. Model of end-stage liver disease score, recipient body mass index, and donor sodium concentration showed no significant effect on time to graft loss in either subgroup. For 3 factors we observed a significant effect on time to graft loss in subgroup CIT ≥496 min: transfused red cell concentrate units (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.09; P = .02), transfused fresh frozen plasma units (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.08; P = .08), and a recipient age of >60 years (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.10-2.98; P = .02).ConclusionsPredictive ability of well-known risk factors for worse outcomes after liver transplantation depend on the length of cold ischemia.     

Living Donor Liver Transplantation Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within or Beyond the Milan Criteria: Comparable Long-Term Outcomes

BackgroundThe long-term outcomes after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) vs deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. We compared the long-term outcomes between LDLT and DDLT in patients with HCCs within or beyond the Milan criteria.MethodsThis retrospective study included 896 patients who underwent liver transplantation (829 LDLTs and 67 DDLTs) for HCC from June 2005 to May 2015. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test.ResultsRFS at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after LDLT was 89.6%, 84.6%, 82.4%, and 79.6%, respectively, and, after DDLT, was 92.4%, 86.2%, 82.4%, and 82.4%, respectively, and OS at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after LDLT was 96.1%, 88.1%, 85.6%, and 82.7%, respectively, and, after DDLT, was 97.0%, 83.6%, 82.1%, and 77.3%, respectively, with no significant differences in RFS (P = .838) or OS (P = .293) between groups. No statistically significant differences after LDLT or DDLT were identified in RFS (89.8% vs 98.1%, respectively, at 5 years; P = .053) or OS (90.4% vs 90.6% , respectively, at 5 years; P = .583) for HCCs meeting the Milan criteria as well as for those beyond the Milan criteria (RFS, 37.8% vs 28.6%, respectively, at 5 years; P = .560 and OS, 57.3% vs 50.0%, respectively, at 5 years; P = .743).ConclusionsPatients who underwent LDLT for HCCs showed comparable long-term outcomes to patients who underwent DDLT. Patients with HCCs within the Milan criteria demonstrated acceptable long-term outcomes after both LDLT and DDLT.     

AGMA Score: A Novel Prognostic Score for Patients Undergoing Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis represents one of the leading indications for liver transplant. In an effort to expand the listing criteria, a variety of scoring systems have been suggested, mainly based on the tumor number/size criterion. The objective of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of proposing a transplant score for HCC excluding the tumor number/size criterion.Patients and MethodsData corresponding to patients who received transplants because of HCC were reviewed for the purposes of this study. Deceased donor and living donor liver transplants were included. Demographic, clinical and tumor-related parameters were evaluated. Uni- and multivariate regression analyses and survival analysis were performed.ResultsOne hundred patients were included in the study. Fifty-five patients underwent deceased donor liver transplant, and 45 patients received living donor liver transplants. Tumor differentiation (G1/2 vs G3), alpha-fetoprotein levels (AFP), recipient age, and recipient laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score (MELD) showed statistical significance. A scoring system was developed, with prognostic points assigned as follows: age 60 years or younger:age older than 60 years = 1:0 points, tumor grading well or moderate:tumor grading poor = 1:0 points, MELD score ≤22:MELD score >22 = 1:0 points, and AFP level ≤400 ng/mL:AFP level >400 ng/mL = 1:0 points. This stratification delineated 3 separate population samples corresponding to patients with scores of 4, 3, and 1 to 2, respectively. The calculated 5-year survival for scores 4, 3, and 1 to 2 was 76%, 47%, and 20%, respectively (P < .001).ConclusionThe AGMA score (age, grading, MELD, AFP) showed prognostic value in this single-center analysis and may find clinical implication avoiding the tumor number/size criterion.     

Outcomes in hepatitis C virus-infected recipients of living donor vs. deceased donor liver transplantation.

In this retrospective study of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected transplant recipients in the 9-center Adult to Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study, graft and patient survival and the development of advanced fibrosis were compared among 181 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients and 94 deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. Overall 3-year graft and patient survival were 68% and 74% in LDLT, and 80% and 82% in DDLT, respectively. Graft survival, but not patient survival, was significantly lower for LDLT compared to DDLT (P = 0.04 and P = 0.20, respectively). Further analyses demonstrated lower graft and patient survival among the first 20 LDLT cases at each center (LDLT 20; P = 0.002 and P = 0.002, respectively) and DDLT recipients (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). Graft and patient survival in LDLT >20 and DDLT were not significantly different (P = 0.66 and P = 0.74, respectively). Overall, 3-year graft survival for DDLT, LDLT >20, and LDLT 20 were not significantly different. Important predictors of graft loss in HCV-infected patients were limited LDLT experience, pretransplant HCC, and higher MELD at transplantation.     

Outcomes of Living and Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of the A2ALL Cohort†

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents an increasing fraction of liver transplant indications; the role of living donor liver transplant (LDLT) remains unclear. In the Adult‐to‐Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study, patients with HCC and an LDLT or deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) for which at least one potential living donor had been evaluated were compared for recurrence and posttransplant mortality rates. Mortality from date of evaluation of each recipient's first potential living donor was also analyzed. Unadjusted 5‐year HCC recurrence was significantly higher after LDLT (38%) than DDLT (11%), (p = 0.0004). After adjustment for tumor characteristics, HCC recurrence remained significantly different between LDLT and DDLT recipients (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.35; p = 0.04) for the overall cohort but not for recipients transplanted following the introduction of MELD prioritization. Five‐year posttransplant survival was similar in LDLT and DDLT recipients from time of transplant (HR = 1.32; p = 0.27) and from date of LDLT evaluation (HR = 0.73; p = 0.36). We conclude that the higher recurrence observed after LDLT is likely due to differences in tumor characteristics, pretransplant HCC management and waiting time.     

Factors Affecting Persistent Splenomegaly After Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using a Left Lobe

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate spleen volume (SV) and the factors influencing it after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2LDLT) using a left lobe.MethodsPretransplant computed tomography (CT) and post-transplant CT 2 years after A2LDLT were examined by volumetric analysis in 24 patients. We divided the recipients into the following 2 groups according to the post-transplant SV: >500 mL (Group A) and ≤500 mL (Group B). The factors affecting the change in post-transplant SV were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsThe mean pretransplant SV decreased significantly after A2LDLT. Platelet counts after living donor liver transplantation increased significantly relative to the pretransplant values. Post-transplant SV was >500 mL in 9 patients (Group A) and ≤500 mL in 15 (Group B). Pretransplant SV, platelet count, anhepatic time, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, post-transplant portal vein pressure >20 mm Hg, and post-transplant portal vein flow >250 mL/min/100 g graft weight showed significant differences between the 2 groups. Actual graft volume (GV) and GV/standard liver volume ratio showed no intergroup differences. Multivariate analysis showed that the only significant factor related to a post-transplant SV of >500 mL was the pretransplant SV. Post-transplant platelet counts were significantly increased from the pretransplant values in both Group A and Group B.ConclusionsPretransplant SV is the only significant factor predicting a SV of >500 mL after A2LDLT. However, even in patients with a SV of >500 mL, the platelet count increased significantly from the pretransplant value.     

α-Fetoprotein-to-Total Tumor Volume Ratio Predicts Post-operative Tumor Recurrence in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background/Aims

Serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) and total tumor volume (TTV) are important factors linked with post-operative tumor recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated the role of a new prognostic marker, AFP-to-TTV ratio, in predicting HCC recurrence.

Methods

A total of 655 HCC patients undergoing resection were analyzed.

Results

In the multivariate logistic model, serum AFP level [odds ratio (OR) 32.459, p?=?0.012] and TTV (OR 0.006, p?=?0.01) were independently associated with a higher AFT/TTV ratio. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor recurrence rates were 29 %, 55 %, and 68 %, respectively. In the Cox proportional hazards model, alcoholism (hazard ratio [HR], 1.354, p?=?0.028), international normalized ratio of prothrombin time ≥1.01 (HR, 1.349, p?<?0.001), multiple nodules (HR, 1.381, p?=?0.004), main tumor diameter ≥4?cm (HR, 1.535, p?=?0.001), macrovascular invasion (HR, 1.362, p?=?0.016), and AFP/TTV ratio ≥1.5 (HR, 1.49, p?<?0.001) were independently associated with tumor recurrence. In subgroup analysis, a higher AFP/TTV ratio was significantly associated with tumor recurrence in patients characterized by macrovascular invasion, TTV?≥?40 cm³, or main tumor diameter ≥4cm (all p?=?0.001).

Conclusion

The AFP/TTV ratio, a newly proposed marker for predicting post-operative tumor recurrence in HCC, is a feasible surrogate and may be useful in selecting super-high-risk patients for tumor recurrence.     

Living vs. deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Experimental studies suggest that the regenerating liver provides a “fertile field” for the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, clinical studies report conflicting results comparing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for HCC. Thus, disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared after LDLT and DDLT for HCC in a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Twelve studies satisfied eligibility criteria for DFS, including 633 LDLT and 1232 DDLT. Twelve studies satisfied eligibility criteria for OS, including 637 LDLT and 1050 DDLT. Altogether, there were 16 unique studies; 1, 2, and 13 of these were rated as high, medium, and low quality, respectively. Studies were heterogeneous, non‐randomized, and mostly retrospective. The combined hazard ratio was 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–2.49; I² = 50.07%) for DFS after LDLT vs. DDLT for HCC, and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.73–1.27; I² = 5.68%) for OS. This analysis provides evidence of lower DFS after LDLT compared with DDLT for HCC. Improved study design and reporting is required in future research to ascribe the observed difference in DFS to study bias or biological risk specifically associated with LDLT.     

Physical Function Measured Prior to Lung Transplantation Is Associated With Posttransplant Patient Outcomes

IntroductionThe primary objective of this study was to determine whether pretransplant physical function is correlated with posttransplantation outcomes.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients that participated in pretransplantation screening and subsequently underwent lung transplantation. Pretransplant variables of interest included demographics, muscle mass, body composition, physical function, and physical frailty. Correlation tests were performed to assess relationships with significance set at 0.05.ResultsTwenty-five patients with a mean age of 57 ± 13 years (68% male) with pretransplant lung allocation score of 45 ± 14 were included. This cohort had a 3-year mortality rate of 32% (n = 8). Pretransplant 4-m gait speed was significantly related to performance on the Short Physical Performance Battery (r = 0.74, P = .02) and distance ambulated on the 6-minute walk test (r = 0.62, P = .07) at hospital discharge. Older age was associated with slower gait speed and worse performance on sit-to-stand testing at hospital discharge (r = ?0.76, P = .01 and r = ?0.75, P = .01, respectively). Statistically, only diagnosis of cystic fibrosis was associated with 3-year mortality.DiscussionOur study demonstrates that demographic, clinical, and physical function assessed prior to lung transplantation may be indicators of functional recovery.     

Comparison of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Renal Transplantation With Impaired vs Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

BackgroundRenal transplantation improves long-term outcomes in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD); however, patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are less likely to be selected for renal transplantation. We sought to evaluate the effect of renal transplantation in this population.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 181 patients who underwent renal transplantation between 2011 and 2016. For patients with pretransplant LVEF <50% (cohort 1) and ≥50% (cohort 2), we evaluated the effect of renal transplantation on LVEF, graft failure, and mortality.ResultsCohort 1 comprised 24 patients (mean age, 47 years; pretransplant LVEF 38%). Cohort 2 comprised 157 patients (mean age, 53 years; pretransplant LVEF 64%). Forty-six percent of cohort 1 experienced significant improvement in LVEF posttransplant, with mean LVEF improvement from 38% to 66%. There was no significant association between pretransplant LVEF and graft failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-11.4; P = .1) or mortality (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.3-3.6; P = .9). Coronary artery disease predicted mortality (HR = 3.12; 95% CI, 1.2-8.4; P = .02). Older age trended toward higher mortality (HR = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P = .05). Younger age predicted graft failure (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9; P = .02).ConclusionsIn patients with ESRD undergoing renal transplantation, there was no significant association between pretransplant LVEF and mortality or graft failure, suggesting that patients with ESRD with impaired LVEF can experience positive posttransplant outcomes.     

Predictive Factors for the Resectable Type of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living Donor Liver Transplant

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is an essential factor defining prognosis, and surgical resection is the only curative treatment. However, the factors that define whether surgical resection is possible remain unclear. Here, we compared resectable and unresectable HCC recurrence cases after LDLT and examined factors that determine whether surgical resection is possible.Resectable (n = 17) and unresectable (n = 14) groups among 264 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC from January 1999 to March 2020 were compared and examined for recurrence type, prognosis, and clinicopathologic factors. Overall survival after LDLT (median, 8.5 vs 1.7 years, P < .01) was significantly longer in the resectable group. In univariate analysis, female recipient rate, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) ≥2.75, and tumor size ≤5.0 cm were significantly higher in the resectable group. Younger donors, lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, lower graft volume, and lower graft volume to standard liver volume ratio were evident in the resectable group. In multivariate analysis, female recipient rate (P = .0034) and LMR ≥2.75 (P = .0203) were independent predictive factors for resectable HCC recurrence after LDLT. Female recipient and LMR ≥2.75 before transplant could predict the surgically resectable type of HCC recurrence after LDLT.     

Expanded Criteria for Liver Transplantation in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the few effective treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our aim in this study was to evaluate the risk factors for HCC recurrence and propose new criteria for LT based on pretransplantation findings. One hundred eighty patients who underwent LT for HCC between 2002 and 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Outcome measures included maximal tumor size and number of tumors revealed by radiological studies before transplantation, demographics, and tumor recurrence. Maximal tumor size >6 cm, >7 tumors, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels >1000 ng/mL were identified as independent prognostic factors of HCC recurrence in univariate and multivariate analysis. Disease-free survival rate in patients with a maximal tumor size ≤6 cm, ≤7 tumors, and/or AFP levels ≤1000 ng/mL at 1, 3, and 5 years was 97.9%, 91.5%, and 90.0%, respectively, but the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rate of patients who had a maximal tumor size >6 cm, >7 tumors, and/or AFP levels >1000 ng/mL was 61.9%, 47.6%, and 47.6%, respectively (P < .001). In conclusion, LT can improve the survival of patients with advanced HCC if they have a maximal tumor size ≤6 cm, tumor number ≤7, and/or AFP levels ≤1000 ng/mL.     

The Resistive Index by Doppler Ultrasonography as a Predictor of the Long-Term Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundDoppler ultrasonography (US) is a noninvasive examination for assessing graft function after kidney transplantation. Although Doppler US is routinely performed, only a few reports have investigated whether a high resistive index (RI) detected by Doppler US affects graft function and survival. We hypothesized that there is a relationship between a high RI and inferior outcomes after kidney transplantation.MethodsWe included 164 living kidney transplant patients treated between April 2011 and July 2019. We divided the patients into 2 groups according to RI (cut-off, 0.7) 1 year after transplantation.ResultsThe recipient was significantly older in the high RI (≥0.7) group. Moreover, there were significant differences in the prevalence of pretransplant diabetes mellitus and the value of pretransplant hemoglobin A1c. Regarding long-term outcome, there was no significant difference in overall graft survival (5 years, 92.6% vs 91.8%; 10 years, 85.0% vs 67.9%; P = .64). On the other hand, the mortality was significantly worse in the high RI group (5 years, 99.1% vs 93.9%; 10 years, 96.4% vs 70.0%, P = .013).ConclusionsA high RI might predict mortality after kidney transplantation.     

Liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) has been advocated as a salvage treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Selection criteria still need to be developed in Taiwan. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to assess the clinical findings and outcome of cirrhotic patients with HCC undergoing liver transplantation. METHODS: Our study consisted of 13 HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation during October 1996 to March 2003. The medical records and pathologic reports were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Overall survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 86% and 61%, respectively. HCC recurrences occurred in three patients, one of whom is still alive with HCC recurrence 2 years after LT. The other two patients died of HCC recurrence 1 and 2 years after LT, respectively. Pretransplant alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels of >200 ng/mL were noted in all three patients with HCC recurrence. In contrast, only one of the ten patients without HCC recurrence had pretransplant AFP >200 ng/mL (P = .003). Four patients did not meet Milan criteria, two of whom had HCC recurrence. However, the other two patients with microscopic vascular invasion survived and were free of HCC. The only one patient, who had histologic grade 4 HCC, died of recurrence, although his tumor was AJCC stage 1. CONCLUSIONS: High AFP level is a risk factor for HCC recurrence after LT. In addition to Milan criteria, histologic tumor grading should be considered in patient selection. Microscopic vascular invasion may not affect the outcome of the patients with early HCC.     

Alpha-Fetoprotein as a Modifier of Anatomic Criteria for Transplantation of HCC Patients

BackgroundThe current listing criteria (Milan, University of California San Francisco [UCSF]) for orthotropic liver transplants (OLT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients emphasize the anatomic features of the tumor such as size, burden, and multiplicity. Recent reports showed that patients with large tumors may have equivalent survival to Milan criteria patients. This suggests that differences in biologic behavior of tumors may contribute to the outcome.AimThe aim of this article is to understand the impact of biologic modifiers such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) on survival in both Milan and UCSF HCC patients.MethodsWe reviewed all liver transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing between 2002 and 2013. We analyzed the survival of patients transplanted for HCC who fit the Milan criteria and those transplanted with tumors beyond Milan and within UCSF criteria. We tested various AFP level cutoffs in both groups in relationship to the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates below and above the proposed cutoffs.ResultsSurvival difference was significant between Milan patients with AFP ≤ 2500 ng/mL and those with AFP > 2500 ng/mL (59.1% vs 37.4%; P < .001). The mean 5-year survival was 55% for beyond Milan within UCSF patients with AFP ≤ 150 ng/mL and 35.7% for those with AFP > 150 ng/mL (P = .003).ConclusionAFP level should be incorporated in the selection criteria for HCC patients considered for OLT. Milan patients with an AFP level exceeding 2500 ng/mL have reduced survival. Patients with tumors beyond Milan and within UCSF criteria whose AFP ≤ 150 ng/mL achieve acceptable 5-year survival and are good candidates for OLT.     

Living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: a surgeon‐matched comparison of recipient morbidity and outcomes

Informed consent for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) requires that patients are provided with accurate information on the relative benefits and risks of this procedure compared with deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). There is strong evidence to suggest that LDLT facilitates timely transplantation to patients; however, information on the relative morbidity and death risks after LDLT as compared with DDLT is limited. A matched cohort comparison was performed matching recipients for age, MELD, date of transplant, gender, primary diagnosis, and recipient surgeon. A total of 145 LDLT were matched with 145 DDLT. LDLT had a higher overall rate of perioperative surgical complications (P = 0.009). Most of this difference was caused by a higher rate of biliary complications. However, the complications that occurred in the DDLT group tended to be more serious (P = 0.037), and these complications were strongly associated with graft loss in multivariate analysis. The 3‐ and 5‐year graft and patient survivals were similar. In conclusion, DDLT and LDLT have different complication profiles, but comparable hospital stays and survival rates. In areas of deceased donor organ shortages, LDLT offers an excellent alternative to DDLT because it facilitates access to a liver transplant without compromising short‐ or medium‐term recipient outcomes.     

Clinical analysis of emergency liver transplantation: the role of living donor liver transplantation

The current liver allocation system requires reevaluation because of the advancements in peri‐transplantation care and surgical techniques. And, the role of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in an emergency has not been determined yet. Retrospective review of all patients undergoing emergency liver transplantation (LT) from January 2000 to June 2010 was conducted, and clinical data were analyzed. Of the total 505 LTs, 69 patients (13.7%) underwent an emergency LT. Of these, 54 patients (78.3%) underwent LDLT using a right liver, and 15 patients (21.7%) underwent deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The overall hospital mortality was 21.7% (15/69). The leading cause of death after transplantation was sepsis (60.0%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) >33 [hazard ratio (HR), 16.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.443–191.632; p = 0.024] and existence of pre‐transplantation intubation (HR, 18.2; 95% CI, 1.463–225.483; p = 0.024) were independent factors associated with poor survival after emergency LT. LDLT group and DDLT group showed no difference in hospital mortality (p = 0.854) and graft survival (p = 0.861). Thus, MELD score and respiratory insufficiency could be parameters predicting post‐transplant survival. And, LDLT using the right liver could be an appropriate alternative to DDLT in an emergency.     

Clinical value and limitations of the preoperative C-reactive-protein-to-albumin ratio in predicting post-operative morbidity and mortality after deceased-donor liver transplantation: a retrospective single-centre study

Liver transplantation is still associated with a high risk of severe complications and post-operative mortality. This study examines the predictive value of the preoperative C-reactive-protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) regarding perioperative morbidity and mortality in deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. In total, 390 DDLT recipients between 05/2010 and 03/2020 were eligible. Predictive abilities of CAR were examined through receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses. Groups were compared using parametric and non-parametric tests as appropriate. Independent risk factors for morbidity and mortality were identified using uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A good predictive ability for CAR was shown regarding perioperative morbidity (comprehensive complication index ≥75, Clavien–Dindo score ≥4a) and 12-month mortality, with an ideal cut-off of CAR = 26%. Patients with CAR>26% had significantly higher median CCI scores (60 vs. 43, P < 0.001), longer intensive care unit (ICU, 5 vs. 4 days, P < 0.001) and hospital (28 vs. 21 days, P < 0.001) stays and higher 12-month mortality rates (20% vs 6%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses identified CAR>26%, pre-OLT inpatient hospitalization (including ICU) and post-operative red blood cell transfusions as independent predictors of severe cumulative morbidity (CCI≥75). Preoperative CAR might be a reliable additional tool to predict perioperative morbidity and mortality in DDLT recipients.     

Investigation of Changes in Skeletal Muscle Mass and Muscle Quality and Factors Affecting Changes in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation

BackgroundIn Japan, there are very few cases of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and even fewer studies on the effects of DDLT on sarcopenia. This study examined the changes in skeletal muscle mass and quality in DDLT, the factors related to these changes, and survival rates.MethodsUsing computed tomography (CT), we retrospectively measured L3 skeletal muscle index (L3SMI) and intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) at admission, discharge, and 1-year post-DDLT in 23 patients with DDLT from our hospital between 2011 and 2020. We investigated the relationships between changes in L3SMI and IMAC associated with DDLT and between various admission factors and survival.ResultsPatients with DDLT showed significant decreases in L3SMI during hospitalization (P < .05). Although L3SMI tended to increase postdischarge, in 11 (73%) cases, it was lower at 1-year post-DDLT than that on admission. Moreover, decreases in L3SMI during hospitalization were correlated to L3SMI on admission (r = 0.475, P < 0.05). Intramuscular adipose tissue content increased from admission to discharge and decreased 1-year post-DDLT. Admission L3SMI and IMAC were not significantly correlated with survival.ConclusionsThis study suggests that the skeletal muscle mass of DDLT patients decreased during hospitalization and showed a slight tendency to improve after discharge, but the decrease tended to be prolonged. In addition, patients with higher skeletal muscle mass at admission tended to lose more skeletal muscle mass during hospitalization. Deceased donor liver transplantation was identified as a potential contributor to improved muscle quality, whereas skeletal muscle mass and quality on admission did not affect post-DDLT survival.