Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study of 109 patients operated on by decompression

Background and purpose

MRI is the modality of choice when diagnosing spinal stenosis but it also shows that stenosis is prevalent in asymptomatic subjects over 60. The relationship between preoperative health-related quality of life, functional status, leg and back pain, and the objectively measured dural sac area in single and multilevel stenosis is unknown. We assessed this relationship in a prospective study.

Patients and methods

The cohort included 109 consecutive patients with central spinal stenosis operated on with decompressive laminectomy or laminotomy. Preoperatively, all patients completed the questionnaires for EQ-5D, SF-36, Oswestry disability index (ODI), estimated walking distance and leg and back pain (VAS). The cross-sectional area of the dural sac was measured at relevant disc levels in mm², and spondylolisthesis was measured in mm. For comparison, the area of the most narrow level, the number of levels with dural sac area < 70 mm², and spondylolisthesis were studied.

Results

Before surgery, patients with central spinal stenosis had low HRLQoL and functional status, and high pain levels. Patients with multilevel stenosis had better general health (p = 0.04) and less leg and back pain despite having smaller dural sac area than patients with single-level stenosis. There was a poor correlation between walking distance, ODI, the SF-36, EQ-5D, and leg and back pain levels on the one hand and dural sac area on the other. Women more often had multilevel spinal stenosis (p = 0.05) and spondylolisthesis (p < 0.001). Spondylolisthetic patients more often had small dural sac area (p = 0.04) and multilevel stenosis (p = 0.06).

Interpretation

Our findings indicate that HRQoL, function, and pain measured preoperatively correlate with morphological changes on MRI to a limited extent.MRI plays a central role in the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. Despite this, the correlation between MRI characteristics and clinical symptoms remains elusive as a considerable number of asymptomatic subjects have MRI-verified spinal stenosis (Boden et al. 1990). The relationship between the hard pathomorphological data as seen on MRI and the more subjective data from accepted outcome tools in terms of HRLQoL, functional status, and pain is unknown but is clinically relevant.The absolute reduced cross-sectional area that gives neurological symptoms of central spinal stenosis has been estimated to be around 75 mm² (critical size) (Schönström 1988) and some studies today use a value of 70–80 mm² as a definition of spinal stenosis (Malmivaara et al. 2007). Since MRI is used for the preoperative planning, any correlation between MRI findings and preoperative symptoms and disability would be of interestWe therefore investigated the relationship between the minimal dural sac area (mm²), number of levels with stenosis, and spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative subjective measures of disease in terms of: self reported walking distance, the visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, Oswestry disability index, the 4 physical domains of the SF-36, and the EQ-5D.     

Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery

Background and purpose A considerable number of patients who undergo surgery for spinal stenosis have residual symptoms and inferior function and health-related quality of life after surgery. There have been few studies on factors that may predict outcome. We tried to find predictors of outcome in surgery for spinal stenosis using patient- and imaging-related factors.

Patients and methods 109 patients in the Swedish Spine Register with central spinal stenosis that were operated on by decompression without fusion were prospectively followed up 1 year after surgery. Clinical outcome scores included the EQ-5D, the Oswestry disability index, self-estimated walking distance, and leg and back pain levels (VAS). Central dural sac area, number of levels with stenosis, and spondylolisthesis were included in the MRI analysis. Multivariable analyses were performed to search for correlation between patient-related and imaging factors and clinical outcome at 1-year follow-up.

Results Several factors predicted outcome statistically significantly. Duration of leg pain exceeding 2 years predicted inferior outcome in terms of leg and back pain, function, and HRLQoL. Regular and intermittent preoperative users of analgesics had higher levels of back pain at follow-up than those not using analgesics. Low preoperative function predicted low function and dissatisfaction at follow-up. Low preoperative EQ-5D scores predicted a high degree of leg and back pain. Narrow dural sac area predicted more gains in terms of back pain at follow-up and lower absolute leg pain.

Interpretation Multiple factors predict outcome in spinal stenosis surgery, most importantly duration of symptoms and preoperative function. Some of these are modifiable and can be targeted. Our findings can be used in the preoperative patient information and aid the surgeon and the patient in a shared decision making process.     

A prospective study on CT scan outcomes after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

This is a prospective study analyzing CT scan imaging outcomes after conservative decompression in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Forty patients (18 males and 22 females) initially underwent a laminarthrectomy surgical procedure to decompress the central canal as well as the neuroforamina and nerve root canals while respecting the integrity of the neural arches, facet joints, and most muscle attachments. Morphologic features of preoperative CT scan images were compared with postoperative CT scans of the operative levels, obtained for 36 patients (17 males and 19 females) after a minimum follow-up of 1 year (mean 1.7 years). Successful surgical outcome was defined as an improvement in at least three of the following four criteria: self-reported pain on a visual analog scale, self-reported functional status measured by LBOS, reduction of pain while walking, and reduction of leg pain. Fifty-five percent of patients met the successful surgical outcome criteria, including 14 subjects who met all four success criteria. Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in the interfacet bony canal diameter of the operated levels (3.9 mm, p < 001). However, patients categorized as successful surgical outcomes had a substantially, but not significantly, lower interfacet canal diameter increase postsurgically (mean 3.41 mm) in comparison with patients categorized as failures (mean postoperative increase 4.52 mm). Midsagittal canal diameters remained unchanged in the failure group but increased in the success group. The CT scan canal measures used in this study cannot be advocated for evaluation of outcome in conservative lumbar spinal canal decompression.     

A prospective study of recovery from leg numbness following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

Background

Residual leg numbness (LN) following lumbar surgery can lower patient satisfaction; however, prospective studies are sparse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate recovery from LN following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study

Less invasive decompressive surgery has emerged as a logical surgical treatment alternative to wide decompression of spinal stenosis. The clinical outcomes of such conservative surgical treatment, however, are not well known. The aim of the study was to evaluate short-term psychometric and functional outcomes after conservative decompressive surgery for lumbar canal stenosis. Forty patients had a lumbar laminectomy procedure, which preserved the integrity of the neural arches, facet joints and most muscle attachments. Pre-operative clinical evaluation of the patients included: Waddell's non-organic signs (NOS) performed by an independent surgeon observer; three self-report questionnaires--the Waddell Disability Index (WDI), the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI), and the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS); and a general questionnaire that included a visual analog pain intensity scale (VAS). Post-operative clinical evaluations and questionnaires were obtained in 36 subjects (mean age 59.8 years) after a 1.7-year follow-up (range 1-2.6 years). Pre-operative versus post-operative statistical comparisons of the data were performed using adjusted error rates within families of predictors. Successful surgical outcome was defined as an improvement in at least three of the following four criteria: self-reported pain on a VAS, self-reported functional status measured by LBOS, reduction of pain during walking and reduction of leg pain. At follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in VAS pain intensity, ODI, WDI, and LBOS. Patients classified as having mixed stenosis had a higher incidence of continuous pain symptoms in comparison with acquired stenosis, but there was no differential improvement with treatment depending upon stenosis classification and/or number of operative levels. Overall, 58% (21/36) of patients met the successful surgical outcome criteria, including 14 subjects who met all four success criteria. Based upon a stringent definition of successful surgical outcome, the results of a conservative laminectomy were as good as those of more aggressive decompressive procedures presented in the literature. Our findings indicate that, even in a highly organic disorder such as spinal stenosis, illness behavior plays an important role in predicting surgical outcome.     

Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients

The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the outcome of surgical decompression for spinal stenosis in diabetic and non-diabetic elderly patients. This is a retrospective chart analysis conducted in a university affiliated referral hospital. The participants were consecutive patients, age 65 and older, undergoing laminectomy for spinal stenosis during 1990–2000. We assessed patients clinical and demographic data, procedures, perioperative complications, preoperative and postoperative pain intensity, basic activities of daily living (BADL), patients satisfaction, the need for repeated surgery, and overall mortality. A total number of 62 elderly diabetic group (DG) patients undergoing decompression surgery for spinal stenosis were compared with a sex and age-matched non-diabetic control group (CG) at baseline, and a mean of 40.3 months thereafter. We found that the DG patients had more pain (p=0.042), and suffered more frequently from neurogenic claudication (p=0.0018), motor weakness (p=0.021) and numbness of the affected limb (p=0.0069) than the CG patients. Nocturnal pain was reported in 24% of the DG patients. Pain relief was successfully achieved in both groups (p<0.001), but the patients satisfaction was greater in the non-diabetic patients (p=0.0067). Revision surgery was more frequently performed in the DG than the CG (non-significant difference), and the time interval for such a second intervention was shorter (p=0.04) in the DG. A higher rate of post-operative complications was observed in the DG (p<0.0001). It is concluded that surgical treatment of elderly diabetic patients suffering from spinal stenosis improves BADL and ameliorates pain, but the results remain worse than those observed in non-diabetics. The outcome of diabetic patients depends upon the presence of other comorbidities, concurrent diabetic neuropathy, duration of diabetes and insulin treatment. Successful postoperative pain reduction remained the strongest factor associated with patients satisfaction.     

Lumbar spinal surgery improves locomotive syndrome in elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A multicenter prospective study

BackgroundOwing to musculoskeletal dysfunction, locomotive syndrome elevates the risk of requiring nursing care. Among degenerative musculoskeletal disorders, lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) associates with locomotive syndrome; however, whether lumbar spinal surgery for LSS improves locomotive syndrome remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to identify the efficacy of lumbar spinal surgery on locomotive syndrome among elderly patients with LSS.MethodsWe prospectively collected the clinical data from multiple institutions of patients (age >65 years) who underwent lumbar spinal surgery. Patients were examined for the locomotive syndrome risk test, including the stand-up Test, the two-step Test, and the 25-question risk assessment, 1-day preoperatively and 6-month and 1-year postoperatively. Using a logistic regression model, we identified factors associated with improvement of locomotive syndrome in the total assessment.ResultsOverall, we examined the data of 166 patients in this study. Upon converting each score of three tests to the stage of locomotive syndrome, the two-step test and the 25-question risk assessment revealed marked improvement in the postoperative distribution of stages. However, the stand-up test revealed a comparable distribution of stages pre- and postoperatively. In the total assessment, the postoperative distribution of stages was significantly improved than that preoperatively. The multivariable analysis revealed that failed back surgery syndrome [odds ratio (OR), 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04–1.05; P = 0.057)] and preoperative stage of 2 in stand-up test (OR, 0.2; 95% CI: 0.05–1.02; P = 0.054) tended to have inverse association with postoperative improvement of locomotive syndrome in the total assessment.ConclusionsLumbar spinal surgery improved the stage of locomotive syndrome among elderly patients with LSS. This study suggests that lumbar spinal surgery for LSS could be beneficial in alleviating locomotive syndrome.     

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis

Fifty patients who had spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were prospectively studied clinically and radiographically to determine if concomitant intertransverse-process arthrodesis provided better results than decompressive laminectomy alone. There were thirty-six women and fourteen men. The mean age of the twenty-five patients who had had an arthrodesis was 63.5 years and that of the twenty-five patients who had not had an arthrodesis, sixty-five years. The level of the operation was between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae in forty-one patients and between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae in nine patients. The patients were followed for a mean of three years (range, 2.4 to four years). In the patients who had had a concomitant arthrodesis, the results were significantly better with respect to relief of pain in the back and lower limbs.     

Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective comparative study with conservatively treated patients

The authors performed single- or multiple-level unilateral laminectomy to treat lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with mild to moderate leg pain and compared the results with those from patients treated with conservative therapy in a prospective study. This decompression technique produced a 68% rate of improvement compared with a 33% rate for conservatively treated patients. The surgical group exhibited significant and sustained improvement, whereas the functional and clinical status of the conservatively managed group had returned to baseline during the same period. The preoperative dural sac cross-sectional area at the level of the most stenosis was 70.76 +/- 28.2 mm(2) for the surgical group, whereas on postoperative scans it was 108.12 +/- 31.5 mm(2), with an average correction rate of 65%. Neither new degenerative spondylolisthesis nor any evidence of instability was detected in any patient during the study.     

Sagittal imbalance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and outcomes after simple decompression surgery

Background Context

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common lumbar degenerative disease, and sagittal imbalance is uncommon. Forward-bending posture, which is primarily caused by buckling of the ligamentum flavum, may be improved via simple decompression surgery.

Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery

Purpose

The nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). It is included in the assessment of LSS to help determine whether decompression surgery is indicated. Assessment of the reversibility of the SedSign after surgery may also have clinical implications for the decision about whether or not a secondary operation or revision is needed. This study investigated if lumbar decompression leads to a reversal of the SedSign in patients with LSS and a positive SedSign pre-operatively; and if a reversal is associated with more favourable clinical outcomes. If reversal of the SedSign is usual after sufficient decompression surgery, a new positive SedSign could be used as an indicator of new stenosis in previously operated patients.

Methods

A prospective cohort study of 30 LSS patients with a positive pre-operative SedSign undergoing decompression surgery with or without instrumented fusion was undertaken to assess the presence of nerve root sedimentation (=negative SedSign) on MRI at 3 months post-operation. Functional limitation (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), back and leg pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), and treadmill walking distance were also compared pre- and 3 months post-operatively. The short follow-up period was chosen to exclude adjacent segment disease and the potential influence of surgical technique on clinical outcomes at longer follow-up times.

Results

30 patients [median age 73 years (interquartile range (IQR) 65–79), 16 males] showed a median pre-operative ODI of 66 (IQR 52–78), a median VAS of 8 (IQR 7–9), and a median walking distance of 0 m (IQR 0–100). Three months post-operation 27 patients had a negative SedSign. In this group, we found improved clinical outcomes at follow-up: median post-operative ODI of 21 (IQR 12–26), median VAS of 2 (IQR 2–4), and median walking distance of 1000 m (IQR 500–1000). These changes were all statistically significant (p < 0.001). Three patients had a positive SedSign at 3-month follow-up due to epidural fat (n = 2) or a dural cyst following an intra-operative dural tear (n = 1), but also showed improvements in clinical outcomes for ODI, VAS and walking distance.

Conclusion

The reversibility of a pre-operative positive SedSign was demonstrated after decompression of the affected segmental level and associated with an improved clinical outcome. A persisting positive SedSign could be the result of incomplete decompression or surgical complications. A new positive SedSign after sufficient decompression surgery could be used as an indicator of new stenosis in previously operated patients.

     

显微镜下手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的前瞻性研究

[目的] 对比研究显微镜下与传统手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床效果.[方法] 采取前瞻性研究,按同一标准选择180例病人,随机分为两组,A组采用显微镜,B组采用传统开放手术,比较两者在术中出血、住院日,医疗费用,并发症及疗效等方面的指标.[结果] 术中出血、住院日、医疗费用两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01).两组各2例发生硬脊膜破裂,B组2例术后腰椎失稳.术后无神经根损伤、感染等并发症.175例获得11个月以上随访,根据中华医学会腰背痛手术评定标准评定疗效[1].A组优40例,良41例,可5例,差1例,优良率93.1%;B组优39例,良42例,可6例,差1例,优良率92.0%.两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).[结论] 两种方法疗效满意,但相比之下,显微镜下具有创伤小、术中出血少、住院日短、医疗费用少、并发症少,对腰椎后柱结构破坏小,不易造成腰椎失稳.是理想的微创手术方法.     

The effect of prior back surgery on surgical outcome in patients operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis a matched-pair study

Summary It has been widely observed that the outcome after repeat lumbar surgery is rarely comparable to that of primary surgery. In particular, the results of repeat surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) have not been favourable. We used a matched-pair format in an attempt to decrease the confounding factors so as to determine as exactly as possible the effect of prior back surgery on the LSS patients surgical outcome. The matching criteria were sex, age, myelographic findings, major symptom, and duration of symptoms. From one group of 251 patients without prior back surgery (SO patients) and another of fifty-three patients with one preceding back operation (RS patients), forty-one similar matched patients pairs (one SO and one RS-patient) were formed.There were 8 female and 33 male pairs. The mean age of the SO patients was 51.6 and of the RS patient 51.4 years, and the mean follow-up time was 4.6 and 4.4 years. The assessment of outcome was based on a subjective disability questionnaire. The SO patients fared significantly better than the RS patients (32.1 versus 41.3, P = 0.026). A short time interval between operations in the RS patients had a worsening effect on outcome, but this trend was not significant.We concluded that one preceding back operation had a worsening effect on the outcome of patients operated on for LSS. As a whole, the results of RS patients were unfavourable. The proper time for achieving good surgical results in LSS patients is the initial operation.     

Clinical outcomes and significant factors in the survival rate after decompression surgery for patients who were non-ambulatory due to spinal metastases

Background

The development of effective chemotherapy regimens and molecular targeting agents are improving the overall survival rates in patients with cancer. However, patients who are non-ambulatory due to metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) may be assessed as unable to tolerate chemotherapy secondary to poor performance status. This means that the ambulatory status of patients with cancer might be significant for survival time.

Predictors for failure after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study

Background/contextSome patients do not improve after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and surgical treatment implies a risk for complications and deterioration. Patient selection is of paramount importance to improve the overall clinical results and identifying predictive factors for failure is central in this work.PurposeWe aimed to explore predictive factors for failure and worsening after surgery for LSS.Study design /settingRetrospective observational study on prospectively collected data from a national spine registry with a 12-month follow-up.Patient sampleWe analyzed 11,873 patients operated for LSS between 2007 and 2017 in Norway, included in the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine). Twelve months after surgery, 8919 (75.1%) had responded.Outcome measuresOswestry Disability Index (ODI) 12 months after surgery.MethodsPredictors were assessed with uni- and multivariate logistic regression, using backward conditional stepwise selection and a significance level of 0.01. Failure (ODI>31) and worsening (ODI>39) were used as dependent variables.ResultsMean (95%CI) age was 66.6 (66.4–66.9) years, and 52.1% were females. The mean (95%CI) preoperative ODI score was 39.8 (39.4–40.1). All patients had decompression, and 1494 (12.6%) had an additional fusion procedure. Twelve months after surgery, the mean (95%CI) ODI score was 23.9 (23.5–24.2), and 2950 patients (33.2%) were classified as failures and 1921 (21.6%) as worse. The strongest predictors for failure were duration of back pain > 12 months (OR [95%CI]=2.24 [1.93–2.60]; p<.001), former spinal surgery (OR [95%CI]=2.21 [1.94–2.52]; p<.001) and age>70 years (OR (95%CI)=1.97 (1.69–2.30); p<.001). Socioeconomic variables increased the odds of failure (ORs between 1.36 and 1.62). The strongest predictors for worsening were former spinal surgery (OR [95%CI]=2.04 [1.77–2.36]; p<.001), duration of back pain >12 months (OR [95%CI]=1.83 [1.45–2.32]; p<.001) and age >70 years (OR [95%CI]=1.79 [1.49–2.14]; p<.001). Socioeconomic variables increased the odds of worsening (ORs between 1.33–1.67).ConclusionsAfter surgery for LSS, 33% of the patients reported failure, and 22% reported worsening as assessed by ODI. Preoperative duration of back pain for longer than 12 months, former spinal surgery, and age above 70 years were the strongest predictors for increased odds of failure and worsening after surgery.     

Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study

The aim of our study is to evaluate the results and effectiveness of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. We have conducted a prospective study to compare the midterm outcome of unilateral laminotomy with unilateral laminectomy. One hundred patients with 269 levels of lumbar stenosis without instability were randomized to two treatment groups: unilateral laminectomy (Group 1), and laminotomy (Group 2). Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form–36 Health Survey (SF-36). Spinal canal size was measured pre- and postoperatively. The spinal canal was increased to 4–6.1-fold (mean 5.1 ± SD 0.8-fold) the preoperative size in Group 1, and 3.3–5.9-fold (mean 4.7 ± SD 1.1-fold) the preoperative size in Group 2. The mean follow-up time was 5.4 years (range 4–7 years). The ODI scores decreased significantly in both early and late follow-up evaluations and the SF-36 scores demonstrated significant improvement in late follow-up results in our series. Analysis of clinical outcome showed no statistical differences between two groups. For degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis unilateral approaches allowed sufficient and safe decompression of the neural structures and adequate preservation of vertebral stability, resulted in a highly significant reduction of symptoms and disability, and improved health-related quality of life.     

A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study was designed to develop predictive models for surgical outcome based on information available prior to lumbar stenosis surgery. Forty patients underwent decompressive laminarthrectomy. Preop and 1-year postop evaluation included Waddells nonorganic signs, CT scan, Waddell disability index, Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire, low back outcome score (LBOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, and trunk strength testing. Statistical comparisons of data used adjusted error rates within families of predictors. Mathematical models were developed to predict outcome success using stepwise logistic regression and decision-tree methodologies (chi-squared automatic interaction detection, or CHAID). Successful outcome was defined as improvement in at least three of four criteria: VAS, LBOS, and reductions in claudication and leg pain. Exact logistic regression analysis resulted in a three-predictor model. This model was more accurate in predicting unsuccessful outcome (negative predictive value 75.0%) than in successful outcome (positive predictive value 69.6%). A CHAID model correctly classified 90.1% of successful outcomes (positive predictive value 85.7%, negative predictive value 100%). The use of conservative surgical decompression for lumbar stenosis can be recommended, as it demonstrated a success rate similar to that of more invasive techniques. Given its physiologic and biomechanical advantages, it can be recommended as the surgical method of choice in this indication. Underlying subclinical vascular factors may be involved in the complaints of spinal stenosis patients. Those factors should be investigated more thoroughly, as they may account for some of the failures of surgical relief. The CHAID decision tree appears to be a novel and useful tool for predicting the results of spinal stenosis surgery     

单纯减压与减压后融合治疗单纯退变性腰椎管狭窄症疗效对比研究

【摘要】 目的 比较单纯椎管减压术和减压后器械内固定融合治疗无腰椎滑脱和失稳的退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效。方法 自2006年3月~2011年5月期间,在我院接受手术治疗的单纯退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者共63例,其中接受单纯选择性椎管减压术治疗的患者28例,接受椎管减压加器械内固定融合手术患者35例。手术前后分别使用腰椎JOA (Japanese Orthopedic Association) 评分、ODI(Oswestry Disability Index)评分和SF?鄄36(Short Form?鄄36)评分,评估两种术式的临床疗效。结果 两组患者术后1年均取得较好疗效。其中椎管减压加融合组患者术后ODI评分改善31.2分(P<0.001),由重度功能障碍改善至轻度功能障碍;单纯选择性椎管减压组术后ODI评分改善14.9分(P=0.004),由重度功能障碍改善至中度功能障碍;减压加融合组预后较单纯减压组显著改善(P<0.01),术后SF?鄄36评分得到相似结果。结论 手术治疗能极大地改善腰椎管狭窄患者的临床症状,椎管减压加融合术较单纯椎管减压术能更大程度改善该类患者的临床症状。     

Predictors of residual symptoms in lower extremities after decompression surgery on lumbar spinal stenosis

Leg pain/numbness and gait disturbance, two major symptoms in the lower extremities of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), are generally expected to be alleviated by decompression surgery. However, the paucity of information available to patients before surgery about specific predictors has resulted in some of them being dissatisfied with the surgical outcome when the major symptoms remain after the procedure. This prospective, observational study sought to identify the predictors of the outcome of a decompression surgery: modified fenestration with restorative spinoplasty. Of 109 consecutive LSS patients who underwent the decompression surgery, 89 (56 males and 33 females) completed the 2 year follow-up. Both leg pain/numbness and gait disturbance determined by the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system were significantly improved at 2 years after surgery compared to those preoperative, regardless of potential predictors including gender, preoperative presence of resting numbness in the leg, drop foot, cauda equina syndrome, degenerative spinal deformity or myelographic filling defect, or the number of decompressed levels. However, 27 (30.3%) and 13 (14.6%) patients showed residual leg pain/numbness and gait disturbance, respectively. Among the variables examined, the preoperative resting numbness was associated with residual leg pain/numbness and gait disturbance, and the preoperative drop foot was associated with residual gait disturbance, which was confirmed by logistic regression analysis after adjustment for age and gender. This is the first study to identify specific predictors for these two remaining major symptoms of LSS after decompression surgery, and consideration could be given to including this in the informed consent.