Cyclosporine withdrawal in stable renal transplant recipients after azathioprine-mycophenolate mofetil conversion

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine A (CsA) nephrotoxicity is a nonimmunologic factor of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) in kidney transplant recipients. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may allow CsA dosage reduction or even complete withdrawal in selected populations with CsA nephrotoxicity or CAD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CsA withdrawal after azathioprine (AZA)-MMF conversion in a population of stable renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Twenty-eight first cadaver kidney recipients were included. AZA was then discontinued, MMF was introduced and after 4 months CsA was completely withdrawn. All patients underwent inuline clearance measurement and renal biopsy at inclusion and at the end of the follow-up (40 wk). RESULTS: CsA was completely discontinued in 20 patients. No patient lost his graft during the study period, but 1 patient experienced a reversible acute rejection episode. Inuline clearance improved significantly in the whole series. At the end of follow-up, histological worsening was observed in 50% of patients without any specific risk factor. In these patients, inuline clearance did not improve. Systolic blood pressure, the need for anti-hypertensive drugs and HDL cholesterol improved. CONCLUSION: In stable kidney transplant recipients, CsA withdrawal after AZA replacement by MMF switch was safe with regard to acute rejection. It improved blood pressure and the lipid profile, but, in 50% of patients was associated with histologic deterioration.     

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in high-risk renal allograft recipients on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression

OBJECTIVE: In a randomized control trial of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) with cyclosporine and steroids, we demonstrated that MMF reduced acute rejection (AR) among renal allograft recipients (RTX) who were of low to moderate risk. However, 10% had AR when converted from MMF to AZA at 6 months, postrenal transplantation (RT). Two clinical markers, abnormal serum creatinine (SCr) and proteinuria at 6 months, post-RT, were associated with AR postconversion. The present study examined the safety of such conversion in selected high-risk RTX at 1 year of MMF therapy. METHODS: Thirteen high-risk RTX receiving MMF for either high panel reactive antibody (n = 9) or following AR (n = 4), with normal SCr and no proteinuria at 1 year, were selected for conversion. The incidence of AR, adverse events, and renal parameters (SCr, creatinine clearance, proteinuria) at 6 months postconversion was evaluated. Eight high-risk RTX who did not meet these selection criteria were retrospectively reviewed and used as controls. RESULTS: Renal parameters (SCr 123 +/- 26 vs 129 +/- 27 mumol/L; pre- vs postconversion) were not significantly different; no episodes of AR or proteinuria were documented. Azathioprine was discontinued in two patients due to leukopenia. In the control group, one patient had graft loss from chronic rejection, whereas one developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease necessitating MMF withdrawal. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that selective conversion from MMF to AZA after 1 year is safe, even in high-risk RTX. Normal SCr and absence of proteinuria are good screening parameters to identify patients at low risk for AR following such conversion.     

在移植肾功能稳定的受者中主动撤除环孢素A的临床研究

目的 研究在移植肾功能稳定的受者中主动撤除环孢素A(CSA)对急性排斥反应发生率及肾功能的影响.方法 选择35例肾功能稳定的肾移植受者,其中尸体肾移植23例,亲属活体肾移植12例.除2例为再次肾移植外,其余均为初次肾移植.分别在肾移植术后6个月～6年时停用CsA,平均为术后(13.3±9.1)个月.撤除CsA后免疫抑制方案为:霉酚酸酯(MMF)+西罗莫司(SRL)+泼尼松(Pred).撤除CsA前有9例做了移植肾穿刺活检,8例测定了抗HLA抗体.结果 对35例受者随访6个月～4.5年,平均14.8个月.撤除CsA前、后血肌酐平均值分别为(88.1±15.5)μmol/L和(92.3±23.7)/μmol/L(P0.05).撤除CsA后,有2例经活检证实发生急性排斥反应,治疗后均逆转;CsA所致的毒副作用,如牙龈增生、糖耐量异常和多毛症等明显改善.9例移植肾活检中,有3例肾功能正常的受者已出现轻度慢性移植肾肾病表现.抗HLA抗体检测中,7例阴性者在撤除CsA前、后肾功能无明显变化.1例抗HLA抗体呈强阳性者在撤除CsA后进展为慢性移植肾肾病,恢复血液透析.结论 对移植肾功能稳定的受者在移植6个月后撤除CsA,转换为"霉酚酸酯+西罗莫司+泼尼松"的免疫抑制方案是安全的,不增加急性排斥反应风险;撤除CsA有利于消除一些与其相关的毒副作用;对抗HLA抗体呈强阳性者.撤除CsA后很难改变肾功能的进展.     

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in renal allograft [corrected] patients within the first month posttransplantation

This retrospective study evaluated the safety of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to azathioprine (Aza) within the first month posttransplantation in 117 renal allograft patients concomittantly treated with cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone. In 52 Conversion from MMF to Aza was conducted at 2 to 4 weeks posttransplantation in 52 patients (conversion group). Thirty-six patients received MMF (MMF group) and 29 patients were treated with Aza (Aza group). Patients were monitored for allograft function, acute rejection episodes, and CsA levels. The demographics were comparable between groups with respect to age, as well as warm and cold ischemic times of allografts. The cumulative allograft survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 98% +/- 2%, 96% +/- 3%, 90% +/- 4%, 90% +/- 4% in the conversion (n = 52) group versus 79% +/- 7%, 79% +/- 7%, 79% +/- 7%, and 75% +/- 8% in the MMF group (n = 36) versus 93% +/- 5%, 93% +/- 5%, 82% +/- 7%, and 78% +/- 8% in the Aza group (n = 29). The CsA trough levels at 1 year posttransplantation were 208.39 +/- 93.79 ng/mL in the conversion group; 159.30 +/- 52.99 ng/mL in the MMF group; and 241.82 +/- 112.76 ng/mL in the Aza group. The acute rejection rates during a 5-year follow-up were 28.85% in the conversion group; 27.78% in the MMF group; and 24.14% in the Aza group. The rejection-free allograft survival between the conversion group and the MMF group was identical (P < .921). However, allograft survival in the conversion group with acute rejection was significantly higher than the MMF group (P < .024). In conclusion, early conversion from MMF to Aza among renal allograft patients was safe without increased acute allograft rejection during a 5-year follow-up. The overall allograft survival in the conversion group was comparable to patients treated with MMF or Aza therapies.     

Increased incidence of allograft rejection in stable heart transplant recipients after late conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a safe and effective immunosuppressive agent in kidney and liver transplantation. Preliminary studies also support its use in heart transplantation. However, the cost of MMF is substantially greater than azathioprine (AZA), the current alternative. Since the majority of rejection episodes occur within the first few months of transplantation, using MMF early after transplantation and subsequently converting to AZA, after the risk of rejection has diminished, might be cost-effective. In order to evaluate the safety of such a strategy in heart transplant recipients, we reviewed the rejection profiles of a group of patients who were converted from MMF to AZA late after transplantation. Forty-three stable patients on chronic MMF therapy as part of an open-label, long-term safety study were converted to either commercially available MMF (CellCept) or AZA, at the conclusion of the study. Demographic variables, rejection histories before and after conversion, and immunosuppressive regimens were examined. Twenty-three patients were continued on commercial MMF and 20 were converted to AZA therapy. The average duration of MMF therapy prior to conversion was 41 months in each group. Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. Treated allograft rejection occurred in 10 of 20 patients converting to AZA, as compared to only 1 of 23 patients remaining on MMF; p = 0.002. Additionally, mean scores (1-5 scale) for the three biopsies before and after conversion favored continued MMF therapy (1.5+/-0.6 before and 1.2+/-0.4 after conversion in MMF group vs. 1.3+/-0.5 before and 1.7+/-0.9 after conversion to AZA; p = 0.02). No allograft loss occurred as a result of conversion. These data suggest that conversion from MMF to AZA, even late after transplantation, can be associated with allograft rejection. The costs associated with these rejection episodes (the additional immunosuppressive agents, endomyocardial biopsies, and physician visits) may exceed the potential cost savings of converting stable heart transplant recipients from MMF to AZA.     

Conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil followed by calcineurin inhibitor minimization or elimination in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the conversion from azathioprine (AZA) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) followed by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) elimination or minimization in patients with progressive chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). METHODS: Between November 6, 1999 and February 12, 2003, 169 patients receiving CNI/AZA/prednisone (153 CsA; 14 tacrolimus) were included in this study. Demographics, immunosuppression, graft function, hematology, and biochemistry were obtained before (-6, -3, and -1 month) and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after and at last follow-up visit after conversion. RESULTS: Mean age was 34 +/- 12 years, 66% males, 51% Caucasian, and 72% living allograft recipients. Mean follow-up times before and after conversion were 32.4 and 19.4 months; 10 patients completed 3 years of follow-up. CNI elimination was performed in 39% and minimization in 61% of patients. Overall there was significantly improved graft function at 1 year after conversion (2.6 +/- 1.0 vs 2.1 +/- 0.6 mg/dL, P = .038). The slopes of the regression lines of 1/Cr vs time were significantly improved from preconversion to after conversion (-0.026 vs +0.007 mg(-1)/dL per day(-1), P = .001). There was a significant decrease in mean systolic (141 +/- 21 vs 135 +/- 22 mm Hg, P = .015) and diastolic (89 +/- 15 vs 84 +/- 14 mm Hg, P = .005) blood pressure values at 1 year. There were four episodes of acute rejection (Banff IA) treated with steroids. Three years after conversion, patient and graft survivals were 95% and 79%, respectively. One patient developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. CONCLUSION: Among patients with CAD, conversion from AZA to MMF followed by CNI minimization or elimination was a safe and effective strategy to preserve or improve graft function.     

环孢素A转换为他克莫司对慢性移植肾肾病患者的治疗效果

目的 探讨由环孢素A(CsA)转换为他克莫司(Tac)为主的免疫抑制方案对慢性移植肾肾病(CAN)患者的治疗效果.方法 选择接受同种肾移植后发生CAN的患者153例,患者肾移植后均采用CsA、吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)及泼尼松(Pred)的免疫抑制方案.根据是否以Tac替换CsA将患者分为两组.(1)CsA组:45例,进入研究后患者维持原免疫抑制方案.(2)Tac组:108例,进入研究后将CsA转换为Tac,停用CsA后立即开始服用Tac,MMF和Pred的用法同CsA组.对所有患者随访12个月,观察人/移植肾存活率、急性排斥反应发生率、移植肾功能、24 h尿蛋白定量、移植肾穿刺病理学活检及免疫抑制剂的不良反应等指标.结果 随访12个月时,CsA组和Tac组患者存活率均为100%,移植肾存活率分别为86.6%和93.5%(P＜0.05);急性排斥反应发生率分别为4.4%(2/45)和3.7%(4/108)(P＞0.05),6例发生急性排斥反应的患者均经甲泼尼龙冲击治疗3 d后逆转.Tac组患者移植肾功能明显改善,并且出现重度蛋白尿、重度肾间质纤维化和肾小管萎缩的患者比例较CsA组显著减少(P＜0.05).Tac组有13.8%(15例)的患者出现轻度血糖增高,发生率显著高于CsA组的4.4%(2例)(P＜0.05);Tac组有22.2%(24例)的患者发生高血压,发生率显著低于CsA组的55.6%(25例)(P＜0.05);17例因使用CsA而出现牙龈增生和多毛症者,经转换治疗后,症状均明显好转.结论 由CsA转换为Tac为主的免疫抑制方案能够显著改善CAN患者的移植肾功能,延缓CAN的发展,转换过程中未发生严重Tac不良反应并且改善了使用CsA时出现的不良反应.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the effect of conversion from cyclosporine A (CsA) to tacrolimus (Tac) on chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Methods 153 CAN patients undergoing kidney transplantation received CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone (CsA-MMF-Pred) regimen after kidney transplantation, and divided into 2 groups according to whether CsA were maintained in the immunosuppressive regimen: CsA + MMF + Pred group (CsA group, n = 45); Tac + MMF + Pred group (Tac group, n = 108). The patients were followed up with patient/kidney survival rate, acute rejection incidence, renal function, 24-h proteinuria and adverse events of immunosuppressive drugs for 12 months. Results Compared with CsA group, the transplanted kidney survival rate was significantly higher in Tac group (93. 5 % vs 86.6 %, P＜0. 05). Acute rejection (AR) was diagnosed in 4. 4 % (2/45) of recipients in CsA group and 3. 7 % (4/108) in Tac group (P＞0. 05) respectively. Acute rejection (2 cases in CsA group and 4 in Tac group) was reversed by 500 mg of methylprednisolone for consecutive 3 days, and the patients in Tac group showed a significantly lower degree of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) (P＜0. 05).Renal allograft functions and 24-h proteinuria during a follow-up period of 12 months were significantly improved in Tac group (P ＜ 0. 05). Incidence of mild hyperglycemia in Tac Group (13.8 %, 15/108) was significantly higher than in CsA group (4.4 %, 2/45), and that of hypertension in Tac group (22. 2 %, 24/108) was significantly lower than in CsA group (55.6 %,25/45). CsA-related side effects (such as hirsutism and gingival hypertrophy) in 17 patients were greatly improved after conversion from CsA to Tac treatment. Conclusion The conversion from CsA to Tac on the patients with CAN can improve renal allograft function, retard the progression of renal allograft dysfunction, reduce the incidence of CsA-related side effects and not generate serious adverse effects of Tac.     

Conversion of azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil and chronic graft failure progression

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of conversion from azathioprine (AZA) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on graft function in 35 renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The immunosuppressive regimen originally consisted of AZA, cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pr). At the onset of the study (mean period = 39 posttransplant months), a graft biopsy was performed on all patients who were randomly divided into group 1 (n = 17) in whom MMF was introduced instead of AZA. The remaining 18 subjects (group 2) were maintained on the previous regimen. Two periods were analyzed: period I: 12 months before, and period II: 12 months after biopsy and therapy conversion. Graft function was assessed monthly by measurements of the 24-hour creatinine clearance (CCr). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences in CCr and proteinuria between the two groups. No difference was observed in the baseline characteristics, in the incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection, or in the mean CsA dose. Pathohistological analysis revealed advanced CAN in the majority of patients in both groups. The morphological changes negatively correlated with graft function. The graft function showed parallel deterioration in the two groups; no significant difference was observed in the mean CCr values in the periods studied. Proteinuria was similar for both groups throughout the study. Conversion of AZA to MMF in recipients with CAN, albeit safe, was without significant benefit on the progression of chronic graft failure over the period of a year.     

Assessment of the risk of chronic allograft dysfunction after renal transplantation in a randomized cyclosporine withdrawal trial

BACKGROUND: We report the two-year follow-up of a trial comparing the three-month postgraft discontinuation of either cyclosporine (CsA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from a triple-drug regimen after de novo renal transplantation. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients were enrolled in this study and randomized to be withdrawn from CsA (MMF group, n=54) or MMF (CsA group, n=54). RESULTS: Despite an increased risk of acute rejection and a lower, but nonsignificant, two-year graft survival, CsA withdrawal induced a sustained improvement of the renal function. At one year, the chronic allograft damage index was similar in both the MMF and CsA groups. However, CsA elimination resulted in a higher incidence of C4d deposits, irrespective of the occurrence of a prior acute rejection. While this finding could suggest a risk of chronic rejection in the MMF group, the outcome did not appear to be related to the C4d status. Moreover, logistic regression analysis showed that only two factors, acute rejection and the one-year glomerular filtration rate level, were predictive of a significant decline of the renal function at two years. CONCLUSIONS: These results point out the need to secure the minimization of the calcineurin inhibitors after renal transplantation, in order to reduce the risk of acute rejection in these patients, because this strategy allows the improvement of the one-year renal function which is predictive of a chronic allograft dysfunction.     

Randomized, prospective trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: In simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplantation, manifestations of renal allograft rejection typically become evident before those of pancreatic rejection. This study compared mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in prevention of renal rejection after primary SPK transplantation. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, multicenter study, patients received MMF 1.5 g twice daily (n=74) or AZA 1-3 mg/kg daily (n=76) for 1 year after transplantation. The incidence of rejection was assessed at 6 months. Adverse events were tracked through 1 year. Survival data are reported through 2 years. RESULTS: At 6 months, efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: rejection (27% vs. 39%); rejection or death (34% vs. 42%); rejection, graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal (i.e., treatment failure; 41% vs. 55%). Six-month efficacy trends favored MMF, and time to rejection or treatment failure was significantly longer when compared with AZA (P=0.049). One-year efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: treatment of renal rejection (35% vs. 47%); renal allograft loss or death (9% vs. 12%); pancreas allograft loss or death (15% vs. 14%). Five MMF patients (7%) and four (5%) in the AZA group died. More MMF than AZA patients developed opportunistic infections (54% vs. 38%), but the pathogens did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Trends for most efficacy parameters favored MMF over AZA, and time to renal allograft rejection or treatment failure was statistically significantly longer for MMF. The use of MMF in the treatment of SPK recipients is a useful advance.     

Mycophenolate mofetil reduces deterioration of renal function in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy. A follow-up study by the Spanish Cooperative Study Group of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy

BACKGROUND: Although studies have shown that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone can reduce the incidence of acute rejection and increase the half-life of the graft, the effects of MMF on established chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) are controversial. METHODS: We studied 121 patients with biopsy-proven CAN, 59 treated with CsA and prednisone and 62 treated with triple-drug therapy with azathioprine. At inclusion, each group received 2 g per day of MMF and azathioprine was stopped. Renal function was measured by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) obtained by creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) and monitored by the slope of the GFR, adjusted using linear regression. RESULTS: The median follow-up, after incorporation of MMF, was 36 (13-36) months, with 103 (85.1%) having a full 3-year follow-up. Before the introduction of MMF, there was progressive deterioration in renal function (GFR: 54.8+/-20.9 vs. 39.7+/-14.0 mL/min, P<0.001). After introduction of MMF, renal function remained stable (GFR: 39.7+/-14.0 vs. 41.3+/-10.8 mL/min, P=NS), with a significant change in the slope of the GFR (-0.0144 vs. +0.00045, P<0.001). In 65 patients in whom CsA blood levels remained unchanged during follow-up (148.0+/-65.6 vs. 154.1+/-58.2, P=NS), the slope of the GFR showed a reduction in loss of renal function (-0.0147 vs. -0.0001, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with MMF reduced the progressive deterioration of renal function in patients with CAN, independently of the blood levels of CsA.     

Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine a in renal transplant recipients with chronic progressive allograft dysfunction: the "creeping creatinine" study

BACKGROUND: This study determined whether cyclosporine A (CsA)-treated renal allograft recipients with deteriorating renal function ("creeping creatinine") secondary to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) benefit from the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to their immunosuppressive regimen, followed by withdrawal of CsA. METHODS: In a controlled, open, multicenter study, CsA-treated renal allograft recipients with progressively deteriorating renal function were randomized to have their CsA discontinued with the concomitant addition of MMF to their regimen (group A) or to continue treatment with CsA (group B). The primary endpoint was the response rate over the 6-month period after withdrawal of CsA in group A or the equivalent time in group B. Response was defined as a stabilization or reduction of serum creatinine (SCr), as evidenced by a flattening or positive slope of the 1/SCr plot and no graft loss. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of acute rejection, graft and patient survival, and changes in selected metabolic parameters. RESULTS: The response rate in the primary intent-to-treat population (n=122) was 58% (36/62) in group A versus 32% (19/60) in group B (P=0.0060). The corresponding percentages of responders in the per-protocol population (n=107) were 60% (36/60) and 26% (12/47), respectively (P=0.0008). There were no acute rejections in group A during the study period. Patients in this group also experienced a significant decrease in total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with progressively deteriorating renal function secondary to CAN, addition of MMF followed by withdrawal of CsA results in a significant improvement in transplant function without the risk of acute rejection.     

Randomized trial of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine 6 months after renal allograft transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In the first year after renal allograft transplantation, triple therapy immunosuppression with cyclosporin (CsA), prednisone (P), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is superior to a triple therapy treatment that includes azathioprine (AZA) instead of MMF. Whether long-term treatment with CsA-P-MMF is better than treatment with CsA-P-AZA is a matter of debate, as 3-year graft survival is similar in MMF- and AZA-treated patients. The purpose of the present study was to examine the short-term effect of changing MMF to AZA in low-risk renal allograft recipients 6 months after transplantation. METHOD: This was a randomized, open-label single-centre study, recruiting 48 low risk renal allograft recipients on CsA-P-MMF therapy 6 months after transplantation, comparing the outcome with continued MMF treatment (2 g b.i.d.) (group A, n=22) or switching MMF to AZA (1 mg/kg) treatment (group B, n=26). RESULTS: The outcome after a 6-months follow-up of patients in group A and group B was similar. Treatment failure rates (defined as clinically diagnosed acute rejection episodes) were 4.5% in group A and 3.8% in group B. There were no patient deaths and no graft failures during the 6-months observation period. Graft function was excellent and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Replacing MMF with AZA 6 months after transplantation in low-risk renal allograft recipients is safe and is not associated with altered graft function in the short term.     

Five-year outcome in pediatric patients with mycophenolate mofetil-based renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) based immunosuppression after renal transplantation has proven to be safe and beneficial for children and adolescents. However, long-term analysis, in particular of pediatric patients, is scarce. PATIENTS: Data of 140 patients receiving MMF versus azathioprine (AZA) in combination with cyclosporine A (CsA) and prednisone without induction were analyzed with a main focus on survival and renal function in long-term follow-up. RESULTS: After 5 years of follow-up, 44 MMF and 20 AZA patients were still on study. Graft survival of intent to treat (ITT) groups was 90.7% for MMF and 68.5% for AZA patients (P<0.001). Cumulative rejection free survival was 51.2% in MMF versus 37.0% in AZA patients (P<0.05). In association with early acute rejections (ARE), projected half-life was 14.4/4.5 years in patients with and 18.7/14.5 years without rejection in the MMF/AZA group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MMF based protocols improved long-term graft survival without an increase in side effects. Early ARE were associated with worse half-life of the graft, although more stressed in the AZA group. Thus, to improve quality of life in children for very long-term outcome, ARE should be further decreased and renal function should be better preserved.     

Randomized study on the conversion of treatment with cyclosporine to azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil followed by dose reduction

BACKGROUND: The introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) in kidney transplantation has improved early graft survival. However, its long-term use is associated with impairment of renal function and increased cardiovascular risk factors. To avoid CsA-related long-term adverse effects, patients were converted to either azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1 year after transplantation. METHODS: Between September 1995 and January 1997, 64 stable renal transplant recipients on CsA and prednisone treatment were included in a prospective, randomized study. Patients were randomized for conversion of CsA to 2 mg/kg AZA (n=30) or 1 g of MMF twice daily (n=34). All patients remained on low-dose steroids. To decrease the total immunosuppressive load, a dose reduction in MMF and AZA was performed at 4 and again at 8 months after conversion. Mycophenolic acid trough levels were measured at regular intervals. RESULTS: After conversion, a decrease in serum creatinine was found for both groups: for MMF, 132 to 109 micromol/L (P=0.016); and for AZA, 123 to 112 micromol/L (P<0.0001). After conversion, more acute rejections occurred in the AZA group (11/30) compared to the MMF group (4/34) (P=0.04). Dose reduction of MMF to 500 mg twice daily and of AZA to 1.0 mg/kg elicited three rejections in both groups. The incidence of side effects and infections were similar. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of CsA spared renal function. In patients converted to MMF significantly less rejections occurred compared to patients converted to AZA. Furthermore, dose reduction of both AZA and MMF is possible in the majority (72%) of the patients.     

Reversal of chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity after heart transplantation-potential role of mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity (CCN) after heart transplantation is a progressive condition that may lead to end-stage renal failure. The extent to which CCN is reversible with reduction or withdrawal of cyclosporine therapy is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the reversibility of CCN and to assess the safety and efficacy of a strategy of cyclosporine dosage reduction, combined with conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil (AZA/MMF switch) to maintain immunosuppression. METHODS: An AZA/MMF switch followed by cyclosporine dose reduction was undertaken in 30 heart transplant recipients (23 men, 7 women; mean age, 54 +/- 2 years) with established CCN at a mean of 90 +/- 9 months after transplantation (range, 17-182 months). The mean maintenance MMF dosage was 2.3 +/- 0.1 g/day (n = 28). Mean cyclosporine dosage was decreased from 2.3 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/day before AZA/MMF switch to 1.6 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: Three patients (10%) were withdrawn from MMF, 2 because of diarrhea and the third because of severe pneumonia that developed within 2 weeks of AZA/MMF switch. All 3 were restabilized with AZA. One patient (4%) experienced acute rejection 7 months after AZA/MMF switch. This resolved after an oral pulse of prednisolone. Systemic infections occurred in 6 patients within 12 months of AZA/MMF switch. Actuarial survival 1 year after AZA/MMF switch was 86% +/- 6%. One patient died of infection and 3 of other causes. Serum creatinine concentration decreased from 248 +/- 15 micromol/liter before cyclosporine dosage reduction to 193 +/- 11 micromol/liter and 206 +/- 19 micromol/liter at 3 and 12 months after dosage reduction (both p < 0.01 versus baseline, n = 23). Of the 23 patients who remained on MMF at 12 months, a decrease in serum creatinine was documented in 19 (83%). Four patients showed no improvement or showed deterioration in renal function, and three of these progressed to end-stage renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity has a significant reversible component in most patients. A strategy of AZA/MMF switch combined with cyclosporine dosage reduction is generally well tolerated and results in short-term improvement in renal function in most patients. Close vigilance is required during the first 12 months after AZA/MMF switch because both acute rejection and infection may occur.     

Conversion to sirolimus from cyclosporine may induce nephrotic proteinuria and progressive deterioration of renal function in chronic allograft nephropathy patients

Antiproliferative and non-nephrotoxic properties of sirolimus have been exploited for treatment of patients with chronic graft dysfunction. In this paper we point to the possible association of nephrotic syndrome and renal impairment with rapid conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to sirolimus in patients with chronic nephropathy. Five male patients, ages 34 to 56 years, with chronic renal failure in the course of glomerulonephritis, were transplanted between 1997 and 1999. For the first 49 to 65 months, the immunosuppressive regimen consisted of CsA, azathioprine (AZA), and prednisone. Thereafter, due to chronic nephropathy evidenced by biopsy, conversion to sirolimus was performed with sharp withdrawal of CsA. The serum creatinine level prior to conversion was 1.9 +/- 0.3 mg/dL. Trace to 86 mg/dL proteinuria was found in 3 patients, while 2 patients had about 200 mg/dL. After 2 to 4 months of sirolimus treatment the proteinuria progressed (558 +/- 183 mg/dL); edema, hypoproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyperlipidemia developed; and the serum creatinine increased to 3.5 +/- 0.8 mg/dL. Biopsies performed in three patients revealed new pathologic changes. After 4 to 5 months, we performed reconversion to calcineurin inhibitor. Proteinuria decreased to 0 to 150 mg/dL; nevertheless the serum creatinine was continuously rising. Six to 15 months after the conversion, 3 patients returned to dialysis. The fourth patient, who was earlier reconverted, has a serum creatinine level of 2.0 mg/dL after 15 months. In conclusion, conversion from CsA to sirolimus may induce nephrotic syndrome with progressive deterioration of renal function. Converted patients require careful monitoring of proteinuria and renal function. Early reconversion to calcineurin inhibitor may prevent progressive deterioration of graft function.     

Six-year follow-up of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil use during the first 6 months of renal transplantation

Long-term follow-up examination to test whether therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA) during the first year translates into different graft or patient survival and graft function is important. Therefore, 6-year follow-up data of a group of 80 consecutive renal transplant recipients were analyzed. The first group of 40 patients was treated with AZA, cyclosporine and prednisone and the second group with MMF, cyclosporine and prednisone for the first 6 months. Graft failure rates were compared during follow-up. Creatinine, inverse slope of creatinine (delta/creatinine) and 24-hour proteinuria at 6 years post transplantation were compared. The Kaplan-Meier analyses for death-censored and non-censored graft failure showed no difference between the groups. Creatinine values at 6 years for the AZA Group were 139 +/- 36 micromol/l (95% CI 125.9-151.2 micromol/l) and for the MMF Group 149 +/- 52 micromol/l (95% CI 133.9-164.9 micromol/l). Delta/creatinine and 24-hour proteinuria at 6 years did not differ between the two groups. We conclude that an initial 6-month treatment with MMF as opposed to AZA reduced the early rejection rate, but did not result in superior long-term graft function or survival after 6 years of follow-up observation.     

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of chronic renal rejection

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest the efficacy of MMF in the treatment of chronic renal rejection in rats. Studies on the efficacy of MMF in chronic renal rejection in man are scarce and controversial. AIM: The aim of this study was to verify in a prospective non-randomized study the efficacy of MMF given at the dose of 2 g/day in substitution of azathioprine (AZA) in the chronic rejection of cadaveric kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with histologically proven chronic renal rejection were enrolled. The patients were 5 males and 7 females. Mean age 38.3 +/- 13.8 years, with a mean duration of transplant of 39 +/- 19 months. Mean serum creatinine values at -6, -3, 0, +3, +6, +12 months were respectively 1.72 +/- 0.33, 1.84 +/- 0.36, 2.15 +/- 0.50, 1.88 +/- 0.54, 1.81 +/- 0.71, 1.73 +/- 0.58 mg/dl. Mean creatinine clearance values were 58.85 +/- 10.06,48.8 +/- 13.3,45.8 +/- 10.2, 54.7 +/- 13.3, 51 +/- 12.7, 57.7 +/- 18.5 ml/min. Mean deltaGFR before MMF was -2.15 ml/month. RESULTS: After MMF introduction, the overall GFR decrease attenuated. In particular in seven patients after MMF administration, we obtained a significant reduction of mean serum creatinine value (1.84 +/- 0.55 vs. 1.38 +/- 0.41mg/dl; p = 0.004). In three patients, we obtained a stabilization in GFR. Two patients were slowly progressing even after MMF introduction. After a switch to MMF in almost all patients, we obtained an improvement of renal function. In three patients, we obtained a stabilization of renal function without regression. In particular, seven patients showed a remarkable improvement of renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion our data even if concerning a small number of patients, confirm the efficacy of MMF in the treatment of renal allograft chronic dysfunction.     

Prospective, Pilot, Open-Label, Short-Term Study of Conversion to Leflunomide Reverses Chronic Renal Allograft Dysfunction

Leflunomide (LEF) is a synthetic isoxazole derivative with anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties, which has been reported to prevent acute rejection and delay progression of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in animal models. We performed a pilot, crossover trial in 22 renal transplant recipients who were converted from azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to LEF in an effort to slow progression of renal dysfunction [deteriorating renal function (n = 5), cyclosporine (CyA) nephrotoxicity (n = 4) or biopsy-proven CAN (n = 13)]. Baseline maintenance immunosuppression consisted of CyA, AZA or MMF and prednisone. Six-month postconversion patient and graft survival was 100% and 91%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine 6months preconversion was 2.2 +/- 0.6mg/dL, at initiation was 3.0 +/- 1.1 mg/dL, and 6 months postconversion was 2.8 +/- 1.3 mg/dL. The rate of change in serum creatinine was 35 +/- 39%/6 months preconversion and -5 +/- 21%/6 months postconversion to LEF (p = 0.003). Two patients discontinued LEF for diarrhea and myalgia. No readmissions, increase in liver function tests, infections or acute rejection episodes occurred. Mean CyA levels did not change, 146 +/- 72 ng/ mL pre-LEF vs. 132 +/- 51 ng/mL post-LEF, p = NS. Conversion to LEF reversed progression of chronic renal allograft dysfunction with minimal toxicity.