Effect of prolonged gastric distention on lower esophageal sphincter function and gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVES: Morbidly obese patients treated with an intragastric balloon report a transient increase in gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms. In the present study, we evaluated the underlying mechanisms of GER and examined the effect of prolonged gastric distention on lower esophageal sphincter function. METHODS: Fasting and postprandial manometric studies were performed in obese subjects (n = 15) before, immediately after, and 10 and 20 wk after placement of a 500-ml water-filled balloon. RESULTS: Residual lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure after water swallows was not affected after balloon placement, excluding mechanical interaction with sleeve function. Postprandial LES pressure was significantly increased after 10 and 20 wk. GER was increased in the right recumbent position until 10 wk after balloon placement, mainly because of an increased percentage of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) accompanied by GER. TLESRs were the main mechanisms underlying reflux both before and after balloon placement. The rate of TLESRs was increased significantly immediately after introduction of the balloon, returning to baseline values after 20 wk. After balloon placement, reflux episodes were evoked by gastric contractions that were not inhibited by meals. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic distention by an intragastric balloon increased reflux up to 10 wk after placement because of an increase in the percentage of TLESRs accompanied by a reflux episode. In addition, prolonged balloon distention increased the rate of TLESRs and created a postprandial state even 10 wk after balloon placement. After 20 wk these effects largely resolved, illustrating adaptation to this artificial situation.     

Excess gastroesophageal reflux in patients with hiatus hernia is caused by mechanisms other than transient LES relaxations

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophageal acid exposure is higher in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with hiatus hernia than in those without. We investigated the effect of a sliding hiatus hernia on the mechanisms underlying spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux over 24 hours. METHODS: Twelve GERD patients with and 10 GERD patients without hiatus hernia were studied for 24 hours. Combined esophageal pH and manometric recordings of the pharynx, lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and stomach were performed using a multiple-lumen assembly incorporating a Dent sleeve connected to a portable water-perfused manometric system and a pH glass electrode. RESULTS: Patients with hiatus hernia had greater esophageal acid exposure (7.6% vs. 3.3%; P < 0.01) and more reflux episodes (3.1 vs. 1.8/h; P < 0.001) than those without. LES pressure, the incidence of transient LES relaxations (TLESRs), and the proportion of TLESRs associated with acid reflux were comparable in both groups. Both groups had equal numbers of reflux episodes associated with TLESRs and swallow-associated prolonged LES relaxations. Patients with hiatus hernia had more reflux associated with low LES pressure, swallow-associated normal LES relaxations, and straining during periods with low LES pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The excess reflux in GERD patients with hiatus hernia compared with those without is caused by malfunction of the gastroesophageal barrier during low LES pressure, swallow-associated normal LES relaxations, deep inspiration, and straining.     

Influence of spontaneous sleep positions on nighttime recumbent reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE: Body position has been shown to influence postprandial and fasting gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients and normal volunteers when they are assigned to lie in a prescribed position. No published studies have evaluated the effect of spontaneous sleeping positions on recumbent reflux in patients with GER. METHODS: Ten patients, three female and seven male (mean age 47.6 yr, range 30-67 yr) with abnormal recumbent esophageal pH <4 on 24-h pH-metry participated. A standardized high fat dinner (6 PM) and a bedtime snack (10 PM) were administered to all patients. GER during spontaneous sleep positions was assessed with a single channel pH probe placed 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and with a position sensor taped to the sternum. Data were recorded with a portable digital data logger (Microdigitrapper-S, Synectics Medical) and analyzed for recumbent percent time pH <4 and esophageal acid clearance time in each of four sleeping positions. Time elapsed between change in sleeping position and GER episodes was also calculated. RESULTS: Right lateral decubitus was associated with greater percent time pH <4 (p < 0.003) and longer esophageal acid clearance (p < 0.05) compared to the left, supine, and prone. GER episodes were more frequent in the supine position (p < 0.04) and occurred within 1 min after change in sleeping position 28% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: The left lateral decubitus position is preferred in patients with nocturnal GER. Measures to aid patients in sleeping in this position should be developed.     

Mechanisms of Acid Gastroesophageal Reflux in the Japanese Population

In contrast to Western countries, reflux esophagitis is considered to be less common in the Orient, including Japan. Transient LES relaxation (TLESR) is a major mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux (GER); however, there are no data on the mechanisms of GER in Japanese people. In addition, it is unclear whether or not the rate of TLESRs, in the sitting position, is higher in reflux esophagitis patients than in healthy subjects. The aim of this study is to determine the mechanisms of acid reflux and the rate of TLESRs, and to compare the rate of acid reflux during TLESRs between healthy volunteers and patients with reflux esophagitis in Japan. Preprandial and postprandial esophageal manometry and pH monitoring were performed in the sitting position in ten healthy volunteers and ten patients with reflux esophagitis of Los Angeles grade C. The energy level of the meal was 692 kcal and consisted of 33% fat. In healthy volunteers, 100% (median) of the acid reflux episodes occurred during TLESRs compared with 55.0% in patients with esophagitis. The remaining reflux episodes in the esophagitis patients were related to straining (12.8%) and absent basal LES pressure (19.5%). The rate of TLESRs in patients with esophagitis was 4.7 h⁻¹ (3.3–5.7) [median, (interquartile range)] and did not vary significantly from that in healthy volunteers [5.0 h⁻¹ (4.3–6.3)] 3 h postprandially. The rate of acid reflux during TLESRs in patients with esophagitis (42.7%, median) 3 h postprandially was significantly higher than in healthy volunteers (9.2%). In Japan, the mechanisms of GER in both groups are similar to those reported in Western countries. The rate of acid reflux during TLESRs in patients with reflux esophagitis is significantly higher than in healthy volunteers; however, compared to rates reported in Western countries these rates are very low for both groups.     

Effect of Amino Acids on Lower Esophageal Sphincter Characteristics and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Humans

The effect of a commercially available mixedamino acids solution, when given either intravenously orintragastrically, on lower esophageal sphincter (LES)pressure, frequency of transient LES relaxations (TLESRs) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) wasinvestigated in six healthy volunteers. LES pressure andesophageal pH were simultaneously recorded on threeseparate occasions 1 hr before (basal) and 3 hr during intravenous or intragastric infusion ofamino acids (250 mg protein/kg/hr) or saline (control).No significant changes in LES pressure were seen in thecontrol experiment. Intravenous amino acids caused a rapid and sustained (P < 0.01)decrease in LES pressure whereas intragastric aminoacids decreased LES pressure only gradually andtemporarily (P < 0.01). In the three experiments nosignificant differences were observed in TLESR frequency,the number of GER episodes, the mechanism of reflux, orduration of acid exposure. In healthy subjects bothintragastric and, especially, intravenous infusion of amino acids significantly decrease LESpressure but do not affect the frequency of TLESRs orGER episodes during a continuous liquid gastricload.     

Effect of intragastric volume and osmolality on mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE: Both transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxations (TLESRs) and periods of low/absent LES pressure (LESP) are the main mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux. These events are believed to be triggered by stimuli from different areas of the upper GI tract. We aimed at investigating the relationship between LESP profile and gastric emptying and distension after meals of different composition in 30 children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (median age 7.0 yr, range 12 months-12 yr). METHODS: Recordings of LESP and intraesophageal pH for 1 h fasting and for 2 postprandial h were performed with a perfused sleeve catheter and flexible electrode, respectively; gastric emptying and distension of antral area were simultaneously recorded with real-time ultrasonography. Ten patients had a standard meal (group A), 10 had a high-volume meal (group B), and 10 had a high-volume and osmolality meal (group C). RESULTS: Postprandial esophageal acid exposure was significantly higher in patients of groups B and C than in patients of group A (p < 0.01); it was also more prolonged in patients of group C than in subjects of group B (p < 0.05). A higher postfeeding rate of reflux episodes caused by TLESRs was detected in patients of groups B and C as compared with patients of group A (p < 0.01). This increase did not statistically differ in patients of groups B and C. Patients of group C exhibited a higher postprandial rate of reflux episodes associated with low/absent tone of the LES as well as a more prolonged gastric emptying time and a higher postfeeding gastric distension as compared with patients of groups A and B (p < 0.01). Finally, a significant correlation was only found between the postprandial rate of reflux events resulting from low/absent LESP and the degree of antral distension in patients of group C (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Gastroesophageal reflux is worsened by increasing the volume and osmolality of meals through significant changes of LESP. Meals of high volume and meals with high volume and osmolality cause a comparable increase of reflux episodes as a result of TLESRs. However, meals with high volume and osmolality cause the higher degrees of esophageal acid exposure than meals with high volume resulting from a higher rate of reflux episodes associated with low/absent LESP. This finding correlates with a high postfeeding antral distension.     

Fasting and postprandial mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease

In order to define the mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children, we performed simultaneous intraluminal, esophageal motility and pH studies in 24 children with symptomatic reflux and abnormal prolonged pH probe study, ten (group A) without endoscopic and histologic esophagitis, 14 (group B) with endoscopic and histologic esophagitis. Median (ranges) age (years) was 5.0 (6 months-10 years) and 3.0 (6 months-12 years), respectively. Recordings were done for 1 hr before and 1 hr after feeding apple juice (15 ml/kg; pH 4.0). All episodes of GER in group A patients and 77.1% in group B patients were accounted for by abrupt transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (TLESR); 22.9% of reflux events in group B patients occurred during gradual drifts of LES pressure (LESP) to undetectable levels. Esophageal refluxate exposure (mean percentage time with esophageal pH<4.0) the rate of TLESR (number of episodes/hr), and the percentage of TLESRs associated with reflux significantly increased in the fed period both in group A (18.5±5.4%, 6.2±2.65, 87.1%) and in group B (29.7±6.5 7.8±3.05, 84.9%) as compared to the fasting state (group A: 10.8±3.9, 3.9±3.17, 46.1%; group B: 16.1±2.6, 4.14±3.06, 55.17%) (p<0.01). The rate of LESP drifts (number of episodes/hr) was also significantly higher postprandially (4.85±1.24 vs 1.8±0.9,p<0.01); furthermore there was a postfeeding increase of the LESP drift percentage associated with reflux (79.41% vs 46.15%,p<0.01). Residual pressure of TLESRs associated with reflux was significantly lower than that of TLESRs without GER in both groups of patients, during fasting (group A:p<0.01; group B:p<0.05) and fed state (p<0.05), whereas duration of relaxation and LESP in the 1-min period before each TLESR did not discriminate TLESRs associated with reflux from those without reflux. In children with GER disease, TLESR is the most common mechanism of reflux, but gradual LESP drift is associated with more severe disease; the postprandial increase in the esophageal acid exposure is mainly due to increased rate of TLESRs and LESP drifts; degree of sphincter inhibition during TLESRs is a critical factor for the induction of reflux.Presented in part at the 91st Annual Meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, San Antonio, Texas, May 12–18, 1990.     

Transient Lower Esophageal Sphincter Relaxations (TLESRs) Are the Major Mechanism of Gastroesophageal Reflux but Are Not the Cause of Reflux Disease

In healthy subjects, the rate of acid reflux during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) is more frequent at the proximal margin of the LES. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that the rate of acid reflux at the proximal margin of LES during TLESRs is similar in reflux disease to that in healthy subjects. Concurrent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring were performed in the sitting position for 3 hr after a standard meal in 10 patients with reflux disease and 10 age-matched healthy controls. The rate of TLESRs in patients with reflux disease (5.0/hr [3.3–6.7]; median [interquartile range]) was similar to that of controls (4.5/hr [3.7–5.7]). The incidence of acid reflux 7 cm above the LES during TLESRs in patients (48.1% [27.2–71.4%]) was significantly higher than that in controls (10.9% [0.0–18.8%]) but there was no difference 2 cm above the LES (75.0 [69.2–87.5] vs. 74.3 [55.5–90.0%]). The rate of TLESRs and the incidence of acid reflux during TLESRs are not increased in reflux disease. These findings, therefore, indicate that reflux disease is not a disorder of TLESRs and relates more to the proximal extent of the refluxate.     

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and baclofen: Is there a light at the end of the tunnel?

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are rapid and prolonged relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) that are not associated with swallowing. They are the mechanism by which most gastroesophageal reflux episodes occur in normal people and in patients with esophagitis. Transient LES relaxations appear to be mediated by a vagovagal reflex initiated by gastric distention. Baclofen is a γ -aminobutyric acid (GABA) derivative that inhibits the production of TLESRs by acting as a GABA_B receptor agonist at one or more loci along the vagovagal reflex arc. Animal and human studies suggest that baclofen decreases the number of reflux events and amount of esophageal acid exposure. Baclofen or another GABA_B receptor agonist may be clinically useful in treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.     

Mechanisms of Excessive Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis

The pathophysiology of excessive esophageal acid exposure, including the way refluxed acid extends towards the proximal esophagus, in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE), is not yet clear. For 3 h after a meal, concurrent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring was carried out on 14 patients with severe RE, 15 patients with mild RE, and 15 healthy subjects. At 2 cm above the proximal margin of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) there was no difference between the three groups in the total number of acid-reflux episodes, the rate of transient LES relaxations (TLESRs), or the rate of acid reflux during TLESRs. The rate of acid reflux at 7 cm above the proximal margin of the LES, during TLESRs, in patients with severe RE (50.9%, median) was, however, significantly higher than in patients with mild RE (35.7%) and healthy subjects (15.4%). In addition, the rate of acid reflux during TLESRs in patients with mild RE was significantly higher than in healthy subjects. Both the amplitude and the success rate of primary peristalsis in patients with severe RE were significantly lower than those of healthy subjects and patients with mild RE but there was no difference between healthy subjects and patients with mild RE. The cause of excessive acid exposure in patients with RE is the difference in the way refluxed acid extends towards the proximal esophagus and acid bolus clearance, not the number of acid-reflux episodes.     

Gastroesophageal reflux and gastric emptying,revisited

Total gastric emptying is delayed in 10% to 33% of adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but a strong correlation between duration of gastric emptying and severity of acid reflux or esophagitis has never been proved. Previous studies reported that patients with GERD might have exaggerated postprandial fundus relaxation with retention of food and triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). There is a positive correlation between postprandial fundus relaxation and number of TLESRs and also between proximal gastric emptying and esophageal acid exposure. However, new studies suggest that a high number of TLESRs and reflux events may occur even with accelerated gastric emptying, and prolonged gastric retention might be associated with less rather than more esophageal acid exposure. Using simultaneous gastric emptying and esophageal pH impedance we found that the rate of gastric emptying might determine the acidity and proximal extent of reflux: The slower the emptying, the higher the pH and proximal extent of the refluxate.     

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations are no more frequent in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease than in asymptomatic volunteers

OBJECTIVES: Studies of the relative frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and asymptomatic controls have revealed conflicting data. We have therefore studied the frequency of TLESRs and the frequency and mechanisms of acid reflux episodes in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and age- and sex-matched asymptomatic controls using standardized criteria. METHODS: Ten patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (four male, aged 50 [30-59] yr) and 10 asymptomatic matched volunteers (four male, aged 50 [32-59] yr) were studied. Esophageal, lower esophageal sphincter, and gastric manometric and esophageal pH readings were recorded for 1 h before and 1 h after a 200-kcal, 150 ml long-chain triglyceride meal. RESULTS: TLESR frequency increased after the meal in both volunteers (median 0 [range = 0-3] to 3 [0-8] per hour,p < 0.01) and patients (1 [0-6] to 2.5 [0-9] per hour, p = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the frequency of TLESRs between volunteers and patients. TLESRs were more likely to be associated with acid reflux in patients (65% vs 37%, p = 0.03), whereas volunteers were more likely to reflux gas or liquid without acid (30% vs 3.0%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: TLESRs are no more frequent in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease than age- and sex-matched asymptomatic volunteers. However, when TLESRs occur in patients, they are twice as likely to be associated with acid reflux.     

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and the related esophageal motor activities

Transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (TLESR) is defined as LES relaxation without a swallow. TLESRs are observed in both of the normal individuals and the patients with gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD). However, TLESR is widely considered as the major mechanism of the GERD. The new equipments such as high resolution manometry and impedance pH study is helped to understand of TLESR and the related esophageal motor activities. The strong longitudinal muscle contraction was observed during development of TLESR. Most of TLESRs are terminated by TLESR related motor events such as primary peristalsis and secondary contractions. The majority of TLESRs are associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) contraction is mainly associated with liquid reflux during recumbent position and UES relaxation predominantly related with air reflux during upright position. The frequency of TLESR in GERD patients seems to be not different compared to normal individuals, but the refluxate of GERD patients tend to be more acidic during TLESR.     

Effect of laparoscopic partial fundoplication on reflux mechanisms

OBJECTIVES: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the main mechanism causing gastroesophageal reflux. Since 1994 we have performed laparoscopic partial instead of complete fundoplication as standard surgical treatment for therapy resistant reflux disease to minimize postoperative dysphagia. To better understand the management of gastroesophageal reflux, we conducted a prospective study of the effects of laparoscopic partial fundoplication on TLESRs and other reflux mechanisms. METHODS: From 1994 to 1999, 65 patients underwent laparoscopic partial fundoplication (180-200 degrees) and 28 of these patients (16 female, 12 male, mean age 43 +/- 2 yr [range, 26-66 yr]) agreed to participate in this prospective study on reflux mechanisms. Before and 6 months after surgery, all patients were evaluated by simultaneous recording of pH and lower esophageal sphincter characteristics, using sleeve manometry. RESULTS: After partial fundoplication basal LES pressure increased significantly (p < 0.05), from 14.3 +/- 1.2 mm Hg to 17.8 +/- 1 mm Hg. Partial fundoplication significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the number of TLESRs, from 3.4 +/- 0.8 to 1.6 +/- 0.3 per hour in the fasting period, and from 4.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.9 +/- 0.3 per hour postprandially. The percentage of TLESRs associated with reflux also decreased significantly (p < 0.05), from 45 +/- 7% to 27 +/- 6% after operation. The number of reflux episodes decreased significantly (p < 0.05), from 4.1 +/- 0.7 to 1.3 +/- 0.3 per hour postoperatively. The majority of these episodes were associated with TLESRs: 57% and 46%, pre- and postoperatively, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial fundoplication significantly increased fasting and postprandial LES pressure and significantly decreased TLESR frequency. This resulted in a significant reduction in esophageal acid exposure, with preservation of postprandial LES characteristics.     

The association of gastroesophageal reflux with bronchial asthma. Can asthma also trigger reflux?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The frequency of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) among asthmatic patients was found to range from 34% to 89% at different locations. The aims of this study have been to determine the frequency of GER in patients with asthma in the Saudi environment, to ascertain the main mechanism whereby GER triggers asthma, and to seek any evidence whether asthma can also trigger GER. METHODOLOGY: Fifty asthmatic patients were consecutively recruited as they reported to King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU), Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, in the period from February 2000 to February 2001; their mean age +/- SD was 38.0 +/- 9.8 years. Twenty-two subjects without asthma or GER served as controls; their mean age +/- SD was 29.4 +/- 8.6. Both groups were subjected to a questionnaire, esophageal manometry, dual probe ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring, and pulmonary function tests. RESULTS: Among the asthmatic group 22 patients (44%) had GER. Accordingly, the asthmatic patients were divided into two groups: asthmatic with GER (n=22), and asthmatic without GER (n=28). Hoarseness of voice and nocturnal symptoms were found to be significant predictors for the presence of GER in asthmatics. Manometry revealed that asthmatic patients with GER had higher gastric pressure (11.4 +/- 4.0 mmHg vs. 8.4 +/- 2.8 mmHg; p=0.006) and lower resting pressure at the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (21.2 +/- 8.7 mmHg vs. 28.2 +/- 9.3 mmHg; p=0.013) when compared with controls, both factors favoring the occurrence of reflux. With regard to pH data, acid reflux occurred both at the distal and proximal esophagus but the percent total acid exposure time was about 7 times longer at the distal than at the proximal esophagus (5.80 vs. 0.9). In addition, gastric pressure was positively and significantly correlated with distal esophageal acid exposure time and the DeMeester score, negatively correlated with spirometric parameters in asthmatic patients, as well as found to be a significant predictor of the severity of asthma (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Forty-four percent of the sample of asthmatic patients reporting to KFHU had GER. Since distal esophageal total acid exposure time was nearly 7 times longer than at the proximal esophagus, the main mechanism for GER triggering asthma is the vagally mediated reflex initiated by acid in the distal esophagus. In addition, the positive correlation of increased gastric pressure with the distal esophageal acid exposure time and the DeMeester score, its negative correlation with spirometric parameters and being a significant predictor of asthma severity suggest that severe asthma may trigger or aggravate GER.     

Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diagnoses in a gastroenterologist's practice. Gastroesophageal reflux describes the retrograde movement of gastric contents through the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to the esophagus. It is a common, normal phenomenon which may occur with or without accompanying symptoms. Symptoms associated with GERD include heartburn, acid regurgitation, noncardiac chest pain, dysphagia, globus pharyngitis, chronic cough, asthma, hoarseness, laryngitis, chronic sinusitis and dental erosions. The introduction of fiberoptic instruments and ambulatory devices for continuous monitoring of esophageal pH (24-hour pH monitoring) has led to great improvement in the ability to diagnose reflux disease and reflux-associated complications. The development of pathological reflux and GERD can be attributed to many factors. Pathophysiology of GERD includes incompetent LES because of a decreased LES pressure, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and deficient or delayed esophageal acid clearance. Uncomplicated GER may be treated by modification of life style and eating habits in an early stage of GERD. The various agents currently used for treatment of GERD include mucoprotective substances, antacids, H(2) blockers, prokinetics and proton pump inhibitors. Although these drugs are effective, they do not necessarily influence the underlying causes of the disease by improving the esophageal clearance, increasing the LESP or reducing the frequency of TLESRs. The following article gives an overview regarding current concepts of the pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of GERD.     

Transient Lower Esophageal Sphincter Relaxations and Gastroesophageal Reflux Episodes in Healthy Subjects and GERD Patients During 24 Hours

Still little is known about the 24-hr pattern of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), particularly in patients with GERD. The aim of our study was to evaluate the 24-hr esophageal and LES motor pattern and esophageal pH and to identify the relationship between TLESRs and gastroesophageal reflux in healthy subjects and in GERD patients. Ten healthy subjects and nine patients with esophagitis (grade I–II) underwent a 24-hr pH manometric recording by means of a portable electronic device. The recording aimed at identifying the temporal relationships between reflux episodes and LES motor events. The GERD patients showed a greater number of either reflux episodes or TLESRs during the 24 hr as compared to controls. While most refluxes occurred during TLESRs in both groups, a small percentage of TLESRs was followed by reflux episodes in healthy people, with only a slight increase in GERD patients. In conclusion, although representing an important motor pattern during gastroesophageal reflux both in healthy subjects and in patients with GERD, TLESR could probably be considered one of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux more than the primary cause of reflux episodes.     

Transient Lower Esophageal Sphincter Relaxations and Esophageal Body Muscular Contractile Response in Reflux Esophagitis

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are more frequently accompanied by acid reflux than in normals. The role of esophageal tone during gastroesophageal reflux events is unknown. We studied the tonic motor activity in the body of the esophagus during TLESRs with and without acid reflux in 11 patients with erosive esophagitis and compared the results with those previously obtained in healthy subjects. Esophageal peristaltic contractions were recorded 13, 8, and 3 cm above a sleeve that measured LES pressure. An intraluminal balloon was inflated 8 cm above the sleeve to induce an esophageal tonic contraction [artificial high pressure zone (HPZ)]. The percentage of TLESRs with acid reflux was significantly higher in patients with esophagitis than in healthy controls (58.3% vs 37.3%, P < 0.05). TLESRs per se were not associated with an inhibition or increase in esophageal body contractility, which, however, changed substantially immediately after reflux. In patients with esophagitis the esophageal body tonic contractility was inhibited in 59.5% of TLESRs vs 36% in controls (P < 0.05). Esophageal contractions during TLESRs traveled down the esophagus in 77% of the instances in patients vs 96.5% in controls (P < 0.05). In conclusion, gastroesophageal reflux during TLESRs was more frequently associated with inhibition of esophageal body tonic contractility in patients with esophagitis than in normals. The different response of the esophageal body to reflux observed in GERD patients may partially contribute to the higher prevalence of reflux during TLESRs in these patients.     

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux diseases in Chinese--role of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and esophageal motor dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) is the major mechanism for gastroesophageal reflux in the Western population. The major reflux mechanism in Chinese patients with GERD has not been studied before. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with GERD and 28 controls underwent stationary baseline manometry and the 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. TLESRs were measured before and after an 850 kcal meal in the supine position. Primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis, and esophageal acid clearance were measured by esophageal manometry. RESULTS: Total time esophageal pH 相似文献   

十二指肠球部溃疡伴胃食管反流患者食管动力及胃内pH值监测

目的：探讨胃食管反流(GER)常见于十二指肠球部溃疡的原因。方法：选择近5年我院接受胃食管动力检查并行胃镜检查明确诊断为十二指肠球部溃疡的患者46例。食管pH监测胃食管酸反流阳性或胃镜检查存在反流性食管炎(RE)者为反流组，食管pH值监测胃食管酸反流阴性者为非反流组。比较两组食管下括约肌(IES)、食管体部及食管上括约肌(UES)等功能差别，同时对两组胃pH值监测进行比较。结果：十二指肠球部溃疡患者为GER／RE的高发人群，反流组与非反流组LES长度、功能压、食管体部清除功能、UES静息压比较差异无显著性。反流组每日不同时限胃酸分泌高于非反流组。结论：十二指肠球部溃疡易合并GER／RE与胃酸增高有关，与食管动力变化关系不大。