The addition of fentanyl to epidural bupivacaine in first stage labour

Epidural analgesia was studied in 100 healthy Chinese women with uncomplicated pregnancies in first stage labour. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 8 ml of one of the following five solutions: bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 50 micrograms or fentanyl 100 micrograms, bupivacaine 0.25% plain, bupivacaine 0.25% with fentanyl 50 micrograms or fentanyl 100 micrograms. There was no difference in quality of analgesia among groups as measured by the reduction of visual analogue pain scores 20 minutes after the epidural dose. The duration of analgesia was similar among groups with the overall median duration being 105 minutes. There was no difference in method of delivery or neonatal Apgar scores. The least concentrated mixture providing good quality analgesia for the first stage of labour was the combination of bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 50 micrograms.     

Obstetric epidural analgesia with mixtures of bupivacaine, adrenaline and fentanyl

We performed a double-blind comparison of six solutions for epidural analgesia in 90 healthy Chinese women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 10 ml bupivacaine 0.125% or 0.25% plain, bupivacaine 0.125% with adrenaline 1.25 micrograms/ml, bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline 2.5 micrograms/ml or the latter two solutions with added fentanyl 50 micrograms. Analgesia was unsatisfactory in 30% of the bupivacaine 0.125% groups without fentanyl. The addition of adrenaline, compared with bupivacaine 0.25% plain, gave faster onset and longer duration of analgesia (p less than 0.05) which was similar to that found in both fentanyl groups. There were no differences in method of delivery or neonatal Apgar scores among groups. The least concentrated mixture that gave the best analgesia was the combination of bupivacaine 0.125% with adrenaline 1.25 micrograms/ml and fentanyl 50 micrograms.     

Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine

The analgesic efficacy of the continuous epidural infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl was compared with the infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine alone in a randomized, double-blind study of nulliparous women. Each patient received, in sequence: 1) 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine; 2) 6 ml of study solution 1 (bupivacaine-fentanyl group: 0.125% bupivacaine/0.0008% fentanyl; bupivacaine-only group: 0.25% bupivacaine alone); and 3) a continuous epidural infusion of study solution 2 at a rate of 12.5 ml/h (bupivacaine-fentanyl group: 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl; bupivacaine-only group: 0.125% bupivacaine alone). The epidural infusion was discontinued at full cervical dilatation, but patients who lacked perineal anesthesia received one or two 5-ml boluses of study solution 3 (bupivacaine-fentanyl group: 0.0625% bupivacaine alone; bupivacaine-only group: 0.125% bupivacaine alone). During the first stage of labor, 36 of 41 (88%) women in the bupivacaine-fentanyl group, and 37 of 39 (95%) women in the bupivacaine-only group, had analgesia of excellent or good quality (P = NS). During the second stage, 22 of 37 (59%) women in the bupivacaine-fentanyl group, and 23 of 35 (66%) women in the bupivacaine-only group, rated their analgesia as excellent or good (P = NS). Women in the bupivacaine-only group were more likely to have motor block at full cervical dilatation (P less than .001). There was no significant difference between groups in duration of the second stage of labor, duration of pushing, position of the vertex before delivery, method of delivery, Apgar scores, or umbilical cord blood gas and acid-base values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Is opioid loading necessary before opioid/local anaesthetic epidural infusion? A randomized double-blind study in labour

The effects of two different epidural loading doses administered before starting an opioid/low dose local anaesthetic infusion were examined in a randomized double-blind study during labour. Forty mothers were given either 10 ml 0.25% plain bupivacaine or 10 ml 0.125% plain bupivacaine containing 5 mcg of sufentanil followed in all cases by epidural infusion of 0.08% plain bupivacaine containing 0.2 mcg/ml of sufentanil, which was continued into the second stage. The quality of analgesia did not differ significantly between the groups in either the first or the second stage of labour: in each group 75% of women required 0 or 1 top-up during labour and verbal numerical pain scores were similar. Over 80% of women in each group reported a pain free second stage of labour. There were no differences in the mode of delivery between the groups with 60% of women in each group having a spontaneous vaginal delivery. The proportion of women with motor block increased with the duration of the epidural infusion, with no difference between the groups. There was no difference in the degree of maternal satisfaction assessed 24 hours after delivery, with 80% of women in each group awarding the maximum verbal numerical score for their satisfaction with epidural analgesia. The incidence of maternal side effects (nausea, vomiting, drowsiness and pruritus) was similar in the 2 groups as was neonatal outcome, assessed by Apgar and neurological and adaptive capacity scores and umbilical artery and vein pH. We conclude that opioid loading before opioid/low-dose bupivacaine epidural infusions is unnecessary.     

A comparison of epidural infusions in the combined spinal/epidural technique for labor analgesia

We compared the clinical effects of three epidural infusions initiated after subarachnoid medication was administered as part of the combined spinal/epidural technique for labor analgesia. Fifteen minutes after administering subarachnoid fentanyl 25 microg and 1 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%, and 5 min after an epidural test dose of 3 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%, women were randomized to receive an epidural infusion of saline, bupivacaine 0.125%, bupivacaine 0.0625%, or bupivacaine 0.04% with epinephrine 1:600,000. All epidural infusions were started at 10 mL/h, and all except the Saline Group also received fentanyl 2 microg/mL. The end point of the study was delivery or request for additional medication for analgesia. We found that time until request for additional analgesia was longest in women who received bupivacaine 0.125% (median duration, 300 min) versus saline (median duration, 118 min) (P = 0.0001) and was intermediate for bupivacaine 0.0625% and bupivacaine 0.04% (median duration, 162 and 180 min, respectively) (P = 0.0001 versus saline). Women who received bupivacaine 0.125% had the most motor block. We conclude that all the bupivacaine-based infusions we tested maintained the analgesia from subarachnoid medication longer than saline, with the longest duration, but the most motor block, from bupivacaine 0.125%. IMPLICATIONS: In this prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study we found that initiating an epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 microg/mL at 10 mL/h 15 min after subarachnoid fentanyl 25 microg with 1 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%, followed by an epidural test dose of 3 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%, maintained the analgesia for longer but with more motor block than with either bupivacaine 0.04% or bupivacaine 0.0625%.     

Effect of Epidural Fentanyl on Neonatal Respiration

Background: The addition of opioids to epidural infusions for laboring mothers may reintroduce the problem of neonatal depression seen with systemic opioids. The authors studied neonatal respiration and neurobehavior in newborns of mothers randomized to receive epidural analgesia with or without fentanyl.

Methods: One hundred thirty-eight women in labor received loading doses of plain bupivacaine. When pain-free, they received an infusion of either 0.125% bupivacaine alone or 0.0625% bupivacaine with 2.5 [micro sign]g/ml fentanyl. After delivery, transcutaneous oxygen tension and carbon dioxide tension were recorded in the newborns every 10 s until 90 min after delivery using a transcutaneous oxygen-carbon dioxide monitor. Umbilical venous and arterial acid-base status, Apgar scores, and Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores 2 h and 24 h after delivery were measured. The umbilical venous plasma fentanyl concentration was correlated with indices of neonatal respiration and welfare in the fentanyl group.

Results: One hundred fourteen newborns delivered vaginally were studied. In the fentanyl group, the mean (range) maternal dose of fentanyl was 184 [micro sign]g (range, 53-400), and the umbilical venous fentanyl concentration was 0.077 ng/ml (range, <0.021 to 0.244). There were no significant differences between the groups for any indices of neonatal respiration or neonatal welfare, and the plasma fentanyl concentration did not correlate with any of these indices.     

Efficacy of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesic efficacy and intensity of motor block with continuous infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor epidural analgesia. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: Labor and delivery suite at Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA. PATIENTS: 162 ASA physical status I and II, full-term, primiparous women. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received epidural labor analgesia. Epidural medication consisted of an initial bolus of 8 mL local anesthetic with fentanyl (100 microg) followed by an infusion at 12 mL/h of local anesthetic with 2 microg/mL fentanyl. Patients were allocated to one of three groups, as follows: group 1 received bolus and infusion of bupivacaine 0.125%, group 2 received bolus and infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125%, and group 3 received a bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% and infusion of ropivacaine 0.1%. MEASUREMENTS: Maternal vital signs, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, sensory levels, and motor block (Bromage score) were recorded every hour. Duration of first and second stage of labor and mode of delivery were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in pain VAS or Bromage motor scores among the three groups of patients at any of the measured time intervals. The time to achieve T10 sensory level and patient comfort was shorter in the ropivacaine (9.35 +/- 4.96 min) and levobupivacaine (9.56 +/- 4.71 min) groups than the bupivacaine (11.89 +/- 7.76 min) group, although this difference did not reach a statistically significant level (P = 0.06). The second stage was significantly shorter in the bupivacaine group, lasting 81.27 +/- 63.3 min, compared with the ropivacaine group (121.69 +/- 86.5 min) and the levobupivacaine (115.5 +/- 83.6 minutes) group (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: There are no significant differences in pain VAS and Bromage scores between 0.1% ropivacaine, 0.125% bupivacaine, and 0.1% levobupivacaine given for labor epidural analgesia.     

Comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia during labor]

OBJECTIVES: To compare the analgesic efficacy and level of motor block using two local anesthetics, ropivacaine and bupivacaine, during labor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty nulliparous women were enrolled during labor after full-term pregnancies. They were randomly assigned to receive epidural analgesia with ropivacaine (group R) or bupivacaine (group B). Group R patients received 10 ml of 0.18% ropivacaine with 5 microgram/ml of fentanyl followed by continuous epidural infusion of 0.1% ropivacaine with 2 microgram/ml of fentanyl at a rate of 10 ml/h. Group B patients received 10 ml of 0.15% bupivacaine with 5 microgram/ml of fentanyl followed by continuous epidural perfusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine with 2 microgram/ml of fentanyl at the same rate. Pain intensity was assessed on a visual analog scale, motor blockade on a Bromage scale, and level of sensory block at different moments. We also recorded total doses of local anesthetic employed during continuous epidural infusion, manner of final delivery, Apgar score, degree of maternal satisfaction and side effects. RESULTS: The demographic and delivery characteristics were similar in both groups. We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups for level of motor blockade, which was nil for 29 patients (96.66%) in group R and 28 patients (93.33%) in group B. No differences in degree of pain or level of sensory block (T8-T10 in both groups) were observed.The total doses of local anesthetic used were similar at 23.7 +/- 11.6 mg in group R and 16.5 +/- 7.3 mg in group B (non-significant difference). Nor did we find differences in manner of delivery, neonatal Apgar scores, degree of maternal satisfaction or side effects. CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine and bupivacaine are equally effective for epidural analgesia during labor at the doses used and they do not cause a relevant level of motor blockade.     

Does the use of low dose bupivacaine/opioid epidural infusion increase the normal delivery rate?

To investigate whether using low dose epidural infusion improves the normal delivery rate, outcome of labour was studied in women with singleton vertex presentations randomised to receive either 0.0625% bupivacaine opioid, or plain bupivacaine 0.125% for labour. The infusion rate was titrated to maintain analgesia and a sensory level to T10. Data were analysed using the unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney U test and for categorical variables chi2 test. Adjusted odds ratios for factors significantly associated with non-normal delivery were calculated using stepwise logistic regression. There were 291 women in the low dose and 296 in the plain bupivacaine group. There were no significant differences between groups in parity, race, induction of labour, use of augmentation, cervical dilatation at epidural insertion, duration of any stage of labour or duration or volume of infusion. Total dose of bupivacaine (126 +/- 47 mg versus 91 +/- 32 mg) and the proportion of women with motor block at the end of labour (45% versus 27%) were significantly greater in the plain bupivacaine than in the low dose group (P < 0.0001). The adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for factors significantly associated with non-normal delivery were primiparity: 4.68 (2.78-7.88), older maternal age: 1.1 (1.05-1.14), longer active second stage of labour: 1.01 (1.005-1.017), total bupivacaine dose: 1.01 (1.005-1.016) and greater cervical dilatation at epidural insertion 1.22 (1.08-1.37). Treatment group and motor block at the end of labour had no significant effect. We found no increase in normal delivery rate with low dose infusions.     

Comparison of epidural bolus administration of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.1% bupivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl for analgesia during labour

We have compared analgesia during labour provided by two epidural drug regimens, in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Group A received 10-ml bolus doses of 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 micrograms ml-1 while group B received 0.25% plain bupivacaine 10 ml. Analgesia provided by both techniques was similar, but women in group A retained motor power in their legs and 60% chose to get out of bed. Duration of labour and time from insertion of the epidural to delivery was similar in both groups, but in group A, duration of the second stage was significantly shorter (P = 0.0003; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.17, -0.27 h) and the incidence of forceps delivery was lower (P = 0.032). Maternal satisfaction with epidural analgesia, as assessed by VAS, was higher in group A (P = 0.04; 95% CI -0.001, 10.001).      

Epidural infusion of diamorphine with bupivacaine in labour

We have compared the analgesic effects of three epidural infusions in a randomised, double-blind study of 61 mothers in labour. An initial dose of bupivacaine 0.5% 8 ml was followed by either bupivacaine 0.125%, bupivacaine 0.125% with diamorphine 0.0025% or bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 0.0002%. All infusions were run at a rate of 7.5 ml/hour. Analgesia was significantly better in both the groups receiving opioids. Diamorphine was shown to be the more effective supplement to bupivacaine. The 5% incidence of pruritis in the opioid groups was less than that reported by earlier authors.     

Epidural bupivacaine dilution for labour

We have compared the effects of three epidural infusions in a randomised, double-blind study of 56 primigravid mothers in labour. An initial dose of bupivacaine 0.5% 8 ml was followed by infusion of either bupivacaine 0.125%, 0.062% or 0.031%. All solutions contained fentanyl 0.0002% and were run at 7.5 ml/hour. Women receiving the most dilute solution had significantly less analgesia (p less than 0.001) for the first 4 hours of the study, but pain scores were then similar for the three groups. No obvious benefit was gained by using very dilute bupivacaine.     

A multicenter,randomized, controlled trial comparing bupivacaine with ropivacaine for labor analgesia

BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis of studies comparing high doses of bupivacaine with ropivacaine for labor pain found a higher incidence of forceps deliveries, motor block, and poorer neonatal outcome with bupivacaine. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in these outcomes when a low concentration of patient-controlled epidural bupivacaine combined with fentanyl is compared with ropivacaine combined with fentanyl. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, including term, nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor. For the initiation of analgesia, patients were randomized to receive either 15 ml bupivacaine, 0.1%, or 15 ml ropivacaine, 0.1%, each with 5 microg/ml fentanyl. Analgesia was maintained with patient-controlled analgesia with either local anesthetic, 0.08%, with 2 microg/ml fentanyl. The primary outcome was the incidence of operative delivery. We also examined other obstetric, neonatal, and analgesic outcomes. RESULTS: There was no difference in the incidence of operative delivery between the two groups (148 of 276 bupivacaine recipients vs. 135 of 279 ropivacaine recipients; P = 0.25) or any obstetric or neonatal outcome. The incidence of motor block was significantly increased in the bupivacaine group compared with the ropivacaine group at 6 h (47 of 93 vs. 29 of 93, respectively; P = 0.006) and 10 h (29 of 47 vs. 16 of 41, respectively; P = 0.03) after injection. Satisfaction with mobility was higher with ropivacaine than with bupivacaine (mean +/- SD: 76 +/- 23 vs. 72 +/- 23, respectively; P = 0.013). Satisfaction for analgesia at delivery was higher for bupivacaine than for ropivacaine (mean +/- SD: 71 +/- 25 vs. 66 +/- 26, respectively; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the incidence of operative delivery or neonatal outcome among nulliparous patients who received low concentrations of bupivacaine or ropivacaine for labor analgesia.     

The clinical effectiveness of epidural bupivacaine, bupivacaine with lidocaine, and bupivacaine with fentanyl for labor analgesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of bupivacaine alone and in combination with lidocaine or fentanyl for epidural analgesia during labor. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: Labor and delivery unit at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Forty-five primiparas requesting epidural analgesia. INTERVENTIONS: Following epidural placement at L3-4 interspace, patients received either bupivacaine 0.5% (Group 1, n = 15), bupivacaine 0.25% with lidocaine 1% (Group 2, n = 15), or bupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl 50 micrograms in 10 ml of saline (Group 3, n = 15). Patients in Groups 1 and 2 received 6 to 10 ml of local anesthetic depending on patient height, while patients in Group 3 received 5 ml of local anesthetic plus 50 micrograms of fentanyl in 10 ml of saline. All solutions contained epinephrine 1:200,000. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were assessed at regular intervals following administration of the epidural solution. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used to measure onset of analgesia, time to complete pain relief, duration of analgesia, and patient satisfaction with therapy. The frequency of shivering and pruritus and the extent of sensory/motor block also were evaluated. There were no intragroup differences in time to complete pain relief or patient satisfaction. However, patients in Group 3 noted the most rapid onset and longest duration of pain relief. Patients in Group 3 also experienced significantly less shivering and had the lowest degree of motor block. Two patients in Group 3 experienced mild pruritus. CONCLUSIONS: Epidurally administered fentanyl safely extended the duration of labor analgesia while reducing bupivacaine dose requirements and magnitude of motor block. In this setting, the combination of bupivacaine and lidocaine offered no clinical advantage over bupivacaine alone.     

Comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in combination with bupivacaine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of fentanyl plus bupivacaine with sufentanil plus bupivacaine for treatment of pain during labor and delivery using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, clinical investigation. SETTINGS: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: 226 ASA physical status I and II laboring patients. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl (2 micro g.ml(-1)) or 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil (0.25 micro g.ml(-1)) through PCEA. MEASUREMENTS: Maternal analgesia assessed by visual analog scale was recorded before epidural block, 1 and 3 hours after epidural block, at full cervical dilation, and at delivery. Motor blockade assessed by Bromage scale was recorded at delivery. MAIN RESULTS: Nine patients in group fentanyl, and 11 in group sufentanil were excluded from the study. Overall analgesia was good and no difference was observed between the two groups. Total boluses of 4 mL bupivacaine-opioid administered and the number of supplementary top-up injections of 5 mL 0.25% bupivacaine were similar in both groups. In group sufentanil, motor blockade and pruritus were significantly lower than in group fentanyl. Nausea was not recorded in any patients. Mode of delivery was similar in both groups, i.e., cesarean section, vacuum or forceps, or spontaneous vaginal delivery. No difference was observed in Apgar scores. CONCLUSIONS: Sufentanil is preferable to fentanyl during bupivacaine PCEA as there is less incidence of motor blockade and pruritus.     

Epidural fentanyl plus bupivacaine 0.125 per cent for labour: analgesic effects

Ninety-five healthy nulliparous women, ASA physical status I-II with an uncomplicated pregnancy and single fetus in vertex position were given lumbar epidural analgesia. Patients in Group A (n = 35) received bupivacaine 0.125 per cent with epinephrine 1:800.000; Groups B (n = 30) and C (n = 30) received the same agents as Group A but with the addition to the initial dose of 50 or 100 micrograms of fentanyl respectively. All patients were evaluated for duration and quality of analgesia, duration of labour, method of delivery and total dose of bupivacaine used. The addition of either 50 or 100 micrograms of fentanyl resulted in longer duration of analgesia (93 +/- 9 min and 106 +/- 8 min respectively vs 55 +/- 7) and reduced bupivacaine total doses (64 +/- 0.03 and 55 +/- 1.5 respectively vs 109.5 +/- 1.3). Only the addition of 100 micrograms of fentanyl improved significantly the quality of analgesia (43.3 per cent of excellent scores vs 6.6 per cent in Group B and 5.7 per cent in Group A). Addition of fentanyl did not affect the duration of labour, the method of delivery and the neonatal neurobehaviour scores.     

Fentanyl added to bupivacaine 0.05% or ropivacaine 0.05% in patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Epidural analgesia is the most effective method for pain relief during labour. The aim was to elucidate the efficacy of ropivacaine 0.05% and bupivacaine 0.05%, which were both combined with fentanyl 0.00015% to provide analgesia in labour. METHODS: Forty nulliparous females were enrolled into the study. After insertion of an epidural catheter, patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Once the os uteri had dilated to 4-5 cm, a bolus of bupivacaine 0.125% 10mL + fentanyl 50 microg (1 mL) in Group 1 patients, and ropivacaine 0.125% 10mL + fentanyl 50 microg (1 mL) in Group 2 patients was administered via the epidural catheter. Then, patient-controlled epidural analgesia was started with a basal infusion of bupivacaine 0.05% 10 mLh(-1) + fentanyl 0.00015% 1.5 pgmL(-1) in Group 1, and ropivacaine 0.05% + fentanyl 1.5 microgmL(-1) in Group 2. When needed, a 10 mL bolus infusion could be given and the lockout time was 20 min. Maternal and fetal haemodynamic variables were monitored before induction and subsequently at 5 min intervals. Using a visual analogue scale assessed the degree of pain. RESULTS: Maternal haemodynamic variables and Apgar scores were not different between the two groups. The second stage of the labour was shorter in Group 2 (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in patients' assessment of motor block or mode of delivery between groups. CONCLUSIONS: An epidural infusion (10 mLh(-1)) of bupivacaine 0.05% or ropivacaine 0.05% together with fentanyl 1.5 microg mL(-1) provided good and safe analgesia during labour.     

A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor

We previously found that the extent of an epidural motor block produced by 0.125% ropivacaine was clinically indistinguishable from 0.125% bupivacaine in laboring patients. By adding fentanyl to the 0. 125% ropivacaine and bupivacaine solutions in an attempt to reduce hourly local anesthetic requirements, we hypothesized that differences in motor block produced by the two drugs may become apparent. Fifty laboring women were randomized to receive either 0. 125% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 microg/mL or an equivalent concentration of bupivacaine/fentanyl using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with settings of: 6-mL/hr basal rate, 5-mL bolus, 10-min lockout, 30-mL/h dose limit. Analgesia, local anesthetic use, motor block, patient satisfaction, and side effects were assessed until the time of delivery. No differences in verbal pain scores, local anesthetic use, patient satisfaction, or side effects between groups were observed; however, patients administered ropivacaine/fentanyl developed significantly less motor block than patients administered bupivacaine/fentanyl. Ropivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 microg/mL produces similar labor analgesia with significantly less motor block than an equivalent concentration of bupivacaine/fentanyl. Whether this statistical reduction in motor block improves clinical outcome or is applicable to anesthesia practices which do not use the PCEA technique remains to be determined. Implications: By using a patient-controlled epidural analgesia technique, ropivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 microg/mL produces similar analgesia with significantly less motor block than a similar concentration of bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor. Whether this statistical reduction in motor block improves clinical outcome or is applicable to anesthesia practices which do not use the patient-controlled epidural analgesia technique remains to be determined.     

Comparison of 0.125% bupivacaine and 0.2% ropivacaine in obstetric analgesia

This comparative study of low doses of ropivacaine was conducted in order to identify the most effective form of analgesia during labour with the aid of supplementary low doses of fentanyl and clonidine. 60 ASA I and II parturient primipares who had asked for epidural analgesia were randomly assigned to two groups. Group R was given 5-7 ml 0.2% ropivacaine and Group B 0.125% bupivacaine with both groups receiving 75 ng clonidine and 50 ng fentanyl with their first bolus of local anaesthetic. The parameters measured included the speed and spread of the sensory blockade and the scale of any motor blockade. The material haemodynamics and VAS pain relief scores were also measured at 30-minute intervals during labour and all side-effects (nausea, vomiting, localised or generalised itching, headache etc) were also monitored. Apgar anaesthetics and other drugs was decided on the basis of the VAS score (a further dose was given to women with a VAS of > 3-4). The study was completed by a telephone interview 6 months after delivery and the data were analysed using the Student's t-test and the chi 2 test. The analgesic effect was satisfactory in both groups and no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups under most of the headings analysed, apart from the top-up doses needed to maintain adequate analgesia. The average time between the first VAS to parturition was 292 mns in Group B and 267 mns in Groups R. Top-up doses of local anaesthetic (2.35 vs 5.05) came on average to 15.8 ml in Group B compared to 24.1 ml in Group R. There were 20% Caesarian sections in Group R and 13.8% in Group B. Optimum analgesia was achieved in Group R, the level of analgesia was insufficient or barely sufficient in 3.3% of cases. There was no Apgar score < 7 in either group. It was therefore concluded that both bupivacaine and ropivacaine offer excellent analgesia during labour and have no significant side effects on mothers or babies.     

Continuous infusion epidural analgesia for obstetrics: bupivacaine versus bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture

Continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) using a mixture of bupivacaine and fentanyl was evaluated in this randomized, double-blind study involving 75 nulliparous women by comparing the mixture (Group I, Bupivacaine 0.125% and fentanyl 4 micrograms.ml-1 -24 patients) with two concentrations of bupivacaine alone (Group II, bupivacaine 0.25% - 24 patients; and Group III, bupivacaine 0.125% - 27 patients). Epidural anaesthesia was established in Group I with 6 ml 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 50 micrograms and in both Groups II and III with 6 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. In the women whose pain score (Visual Analogue Scale) decreased by at least 50% within 15 min, CIEA was given until delivery. The initial infusion rate in all three groups was set at 7 ml.hr-1, but was decreased in the event of motor block or excessive sensory level. For inadequate analgesia, bupivacaine 0.25% in 3 ml supplements was given every 30 min, as required. During the first stage of labour, 88% of women in Group I reported excellent or good analgesia compared with 92% of women in Group II (NS) and with 59% in Group III (P less than 0.05). The proportion of women reporting excellent/good analgesia during the second stage was approximately 65% in all three groups. The total cumulative dose of bupivacaine in Group I was 54 +/- 36 mg, compared with 107 +/- 47 mg for Group II (P = 0.001), and 71 +/- 41 mg for Group III (NS). Group I patients required less supplementation with bupivacaine than either Group II or III patients during the first stage but only with Group III patients during the second stage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)