Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation

Femoral and tibial tunnel widening following ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft has been described. Greater tunnel widening has been reported with suspensory fixation systems. We hypothesized that greater tunnel widening will be observed in patients whose hamstring autograft was fixated using a cortical, suspensory system, compared to double cross-pin fixation on the femur. We performed clinical and radiographic evaluation on 46 patients at minimum 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. We measured subjective and objective outcomes including KT-1000 and AP, lateral radiographs. A musculoskeletal radiologist, independent of the surgical team, measured tunnel width, while correcting for magnification, at the widest point and at 1 cm away from tibial and femoral tunnel apertures. Patients in the suspensory graft fixation group exhibited significantly greater absolute change and greater percent change in femoral tunnel diameter compared to patients with double cross-pin fixation (P ≤ 0.05). This difference was noted on both AP and lateral radiographs and at both measurement sites. There was no significant difference between groups for tibial tunnel widening, IKDC subjective scores or KT-1000 side to side differences. There was significantly more femoral tunnel widening associated with the use of the endobutton suspensory fixation system compared to the use of double cross-pins for fixation within the tunnel.     

Comparison of the bioabsorbable and metal screw fixation after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft in MRI and clinical outcome: a prospective randomized study

There has never been an MRI study of tunnel widening comparing bioabsorbable to metal screw fixation in autologous hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We randomized 62 patients to hamstring ACL reconstruction with either a bioabsorbable (n = 31) or metal screw (n = 31) fixation. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometric measurement, the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores, and MRI. There were no differences between the groups preoperatively. Fifty-five patients (89%) were available at a minimum of 2-year follow-up (range 24–36 months). There was tunnel widening in both groups, but the increase was significantly greater in the AP dimension of the femoral tunnel in the bioabsorbable screw group compared to metal group (P = 0.01). The tibial tunnels showed no intergroup difference. Ninety-four percent of the knees were normal or nearly normal according to the IKDC scores and the average Lysholm score was 91 with no intergroup difference. The follow-up AP tibial tunnel diameter was smaller with normal knee laxity compared to abnormal knee laxity. The graft failure rate in the bioabsorbable screw group was 23% (7/31 patients) and 6% (2/31 patients) in the metal screw group. The use of bioabsorbable screws resulted in more femoral tunnel widening, and more graft failures compared to metal screws. The tunnel widening in the tibia was associated with the knee laxity (P = 0.02).     

自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带股骨端两种固定方式的比较

目的:比较自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带(ACL)过程中,采用Endobutton和Rigidfix两种股骨端韧带固定方式的疗效。方法:回顾性研究了48例陈旧性ACL病例,其中A组24例,B组24例;分别应用自体半腱肌、股薄肌腱重建ACL,其中A组股骨端固定采用Rigidfix交锁钉,B组采用Endobutton纽扣钢板,两组胫骨端固定均为Intrafix界面螺钉+Spiked Washer栓桩固定。平均随访27个月,采用MRI测量两组骨隧道扩大情况,并用Lysholm、TegnerI、KDC、KT1000对患膝进行术前、术后测试和评分。结果:MRI测量发现,B组股骨端和胫骨端骨隧道扩大均较A组明显(P<0.05)。两组病人术后Lysholm、TegnerI、KDC评分均较术前明显提高,KT1000测试结果较术前明显改善(P<0.05);但两组间术后评分无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:在自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带中,与采用Rigidfix固定相比,股骨端采用Endobutton固定自体腘绳肌腱更容易引起术后骨隧道扩大,但在临床疗效上两种固定方式并无明显差别。     

Cross-pin femoral fixation in PCL reconstruction: a cadaver study

In PCL reconstruction many techniques have been described. Crucial item in pre-operative planning is graft choice and graft fixation. Compared to other grafts, hamstring is getting more popular because it is longer, has higher mechanical properties and doesn’t harm extensor apparatus of the knee. Furthermore the absence of the bone block makes easier hamstring insertion in the femoral tunnel. Hamstring greater disadvantage is fixation. Many fixation devices, used in ACL reconstruction, have been described for PCL procedure. One of these, recently proposed, is a cross-pin femoral fixation technique, for hamstring PCL reconstruction [10]. The authors drilled the femoral tunnel in an inside-out manner [11] (width 8 mm and depth 35 mm) and fixed the hamstring with the Rigidfix (Mitek, Norwood, MA), passing the device via the anterolateral (AL) portal. The aim of this anatomical cadaver study is to evaluate the entrance points of cross-pins and the possible iatrogenic damages, during transverse fixation via anterolateral portal. The device we used is the Rigidfix (Mitek, Norwood, MA), designed to use two biodegradable pins for ACL femoral fixation. Femoral drilling and cross pins insertion were performed on 20 (10 × 2) fresh frozen cadaver knees. The risk of chondral damage, evaluated during the knees dissection, is high.     

Does a lateral plasty control coupled translation during antero-posterior stress in single-bundle ACL reconstruction? An in vivo study

The objective of this study was to quantify, in vivo, the reduction of knee laxity obtained by an extra-articular procedure, added to hamstring single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in controlling coupled tibial translation during the Lachman and drawer tests. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated with a computer-assisted kinematic evaluation protocol; patients with associated ligament tears or meniscal damages were not included in the study. All patients underwent an hamstring ACL with an additional extra-articular procedure. During the intervention, tibia was tracked during the Lachman and drawer tests with ACL-deficient knee, after SB fixation and after extra-articular plasty fixation, performed with the remnant part of the hamstring tendons, from end of lateral condyle to Gerdy’s tubercle. Statistical analysis was performed to see whether there was a difference in knee laxity after the tests in the three steps. At 30°, the SB graft reduces AP translation of about 5 mm (P < 0.05) while the extra-articular procedure controls lateral tibial compartment, reducing translation by 1.6 mm (P < 0.05). At 90° the SB graft reduces AP translation more in the lateral compartment (P < 0.05), while the extra-articular procedure contributes in controlling tibial translation reducing laxity by 1 mm (P < 0.05) in both compartments. Result shows that, in vivo, the addition of an extra-articular procedure to single-bundle ACL reconstruction may be effective in controlling coupled tibial translation during the Lachman test and reduces AP laxity at 90° of flexion.     

The mid- to long-term results of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons using Transfix technique

In this study, mid to long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons and Transfix technique were evaluated. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with four-strand hamstring tendon was performed with Transfix technique on 271 (198 males, 73 females; mean age 25.7; 17–52) patients with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. The patients were followed up with clinical examination, Lysholm and Tegner activity scales, IKDC scoring system, KT-1000 test and radiological examination. The mean follow-up period was 82 (48–100) months; 204 (75%) patients had no subjective complaints. According to the KT-1000 test, only 14 (5%) patients had more than 5 mm laxity postoperatively, whereas, 161 (59%) patients had more than 5 mm laxity preoperatively. In addition to this, only 19 (7%) patients had Lysholm scores less than 80 postoperatively, whereas 154 (57%) patients scored less than 80 preoperatively. When compared with Tegner activity scale, 189 (70%) patients scored <6 preoperatively and only 24 (8%) postoperatively; 78 (29%) patients scored D preoperatively and only 5 (2%) patients scored D postoperatively on the basis of the IKDC scoring system. Our functional results were found to be satisfactory in more than 90% of patients. Commonly seen problems in ACL reconstruction such as inaccurate graft placement and tunnel widening were found to be consistent with the values in relevant literature. However, we demonstrated that the functional results and the stability of the knee were not related with tunnel widening. This study concludes that the reconstruction of ACL with hamstring tendons and the Transfix technique is reasonably successful, safe and causes low morbidity. Furthermore, we believe that proper graft preparation, accurate tunnel placement, notch-plasty, fixation and rehabilitation program are all as important as the choice of graft and fixation material.     

The influence of supplementary tibial fixation on laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons in female patients

BACKGROUND: Female patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a hamstring tendon graft developed increased postoperative laxity compared to male and female patients who had reconstruction using a patellar tendon graft. This difference may be due to graft slippage in less dense female tibial bone. HYPOTHESIS: Reinforcement of tibial fixation of the hamstring tendon graft in women by supplementary methods may reduce laxity. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Fifty-six female patients divided into 2 groups (standard tibial fixation with 7 x 25-mm metal interference screw versus metal interference screw with supplementary staple fixation) were followed for 2 years. RESULTS: After 2 years, the mean side-to-side difference using KT-1000 arthrometer manual maximum measurements was 1.8 mm (standard group) and 1.1 mm (staple group) (P=.05). The percentage of patients with a side-to-side difference of <3 mm did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P=.66): 88.8% of the standard group versus 90.5% of the staple group. A grade 0 Lachman test result was present in 63% of the standard group and 86% of the staple group (P=.04). Kneeling pain was experienced by 7% of the standard group and 29% of the staple group (P=.05). CONCLUSIONS: Supplementary tibial fixation in female patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft in addition to a single-size screw significantly improves laxity measurements and clinical stability assessment 2 years after surgery. However, this improvement is at the cost of increased kneeling pain.     

A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation

Changes in the femoral and tibial bone tunnel were studied prospectively after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with quadruple hamstring autograft. To determine whether tunnel enlargement can be decreased by fixing the graft close to the joint line having a stiffer fixation construct we compared "anatomical" (one absorbable interference screw femorally, and bicortical fixation with two absorbable interference screws tibially) and extracortical fixation techniques (Endobutton femorally, and two no. 6 Ethibond sutures over a suture washer tibially). Over a 2-year period we evaluated 60 patients clinically (IKDC scale, Cincinnati Knee Score, KT-1000) and radiographically (confirmed by MRI). The operated knee was radiographed immediately postoperatively and 6 and 24 months postoperatively. The femoral and tibial bone tunnel diameter was measured on anteroposterior and lateral images, and the tunnel area was calculated and compared to the initial area calculated from the perioperative drill size. In the "anatomical" group the immediately postoperative bone tunnel area was 75% larger than the initial tunnel area, after 6 months it was increased another 31%, and between 6 and 24 months it remained basically unchanged. In the "extracortical" group there was no significant enlargement immediately postoperatively, but after 6 months it was 65% larger than the initial area of drill and graft size, and between 6 and 24 months it decreased to 47%. There was no correlation between the amount of tunnel enlargement and clinical scores or KT-1000 measurement. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with quadruple hamstring autograft is associated with bone tunnel enlargement. Using a purely extracortical fixation technique thus significantly increased the tibial and femoral tunnel area during the first 6 postoperative months, while it decreased slightly thereafter. The insertion of large interference screws apparently not only compresses the graft in the bone tunnel but also significantly enlarges the bone tunnel itself. The immediate enlargement at the time of the operation is followed by a reduced further enlargement at 6 months and then stabilization. Tunnel widening did not influence clinical outcome over a 2-year period.     

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with periosteum-enveloping hamstring tendon graft

Tendon–bone incorporation of a tendon graft within the bone tunnel is of priority concern when using for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Superior healing process and stronger healing strength can be achieved when periosteum is sutured on the tendon inserted into a bone tunnel. We applied this idea to ACL reconstruction for enhancing tendon graft–bone tunnel healing. This is a prospective clinical outcome study with this surgical technique at minimal 2 years follow-up. Periosteum-enveloping hamstring tendon graft has been used in 68 patients. Data from 62 patients who had been followed up completely were analyzed. All patients suffered from a grade 3 or higher grade of Lachman and anterior drawer test with a positive pivot-shift test. Clinical assessments included the Lysholm knee scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, KT-1000 instrumented testing, thigh muscle assessment, and radiographic evaluation. The median Lysholm knee score was 59 (40–70) and 94 (60–100) points (P<0.01) before and after surgery. After reconstruction, 81% of patients were able to return to moderate or strenuous activity. Four (6%) patients were found to exhibit grade 2 or more ligament laxity. Complete range of motion could be achieved in 86% of patients. Three patients (5%) had positive pivot shift. Finally, 92% of patients were assessed as normal or nearly normal rating by IKDC guideline. Bone tunnels enlargement of more than 1 mm was identified in 5% of femoral tunnels and 6% of tibial tunnels. The study shows that a satisfactory result can be achieved with the periosteum-enveloping hamstring tendon graft in ACL reconstruction. Periosteum can be easily harvested at the proximal tibia from a routine incision for hamstring tendon harvesting. Besides the potential for improving tendon–bone healing, enveloped periosteum may help to seal the intra-articular tunnel opening in the early postoperative period, and thus avoid synovial fluid reflux into the tunnel. Bone tunnel enlargement could be reduced.     

Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts

We report a prospective series evaluating the incidence and degree of tunnel widening in a well-matched series of patients receiving a hamstring or patella tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. We correlated tunnel widening with clinical factors, knee scores, KT-1000 and isokinetic muscle strength to determine the clinical significance of this finding. Seventy-three patients at least 12 months post-ACL reconstruction were evaluated. Thirty-eight patients had received a doubled semitendinous and gracilis graft and 35 a bone-patella tendon-bone graft. All patients underwent a similar endoscopic procedure and accelerated postoperative rehabilitation. Tunnel widening was determined using standardized anteroposterior (AP) and lateral X-rays adjusted for magnification. A limited series of MRIs was performed to validate these measurements. There was a significant difference in the degree of tunnel widening between the two groups. The mean increase in femoral tunnel area in the hamstring group was 100.4% compared with a decrease of 25% in the patella tendon group (P = < 0.0001). In the tibial tunnel the mean increase in the hamstring group was 73.9% compared with a decrease of 2.1% in the patella tendon group (P = < 0.0001). The MRIs validated the plain film measurements. Tunnel widening did not correlate with the clinical findings, knee scores, KT-1000 or isokinetic muscle strength. Tunnel widening is marked in the hamstring group. Tunnel widening does not correlate with instability or a poor clinical outcome in the short term. The long-term implications of this finding are still to be determined. Received: 11 March 1998 Accepted: 14 September 1998     

Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis

Purpose

To determine whether anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared to anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction more effectively restored antero–posterior (A–P) laxity, rotatory laxity and reduced frequency of graft rupture. Our hypothesis was that anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction results in superior rotational knee laxity and fewer graft ruptures due to its double-bundle tension pattern, compared with anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Methods

An electronic search was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. All therapeutic trials written in English reporting knee kinematic outcomes and graft rupture rates of primary anatomic double- versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction were included. Only clinical studies of levels I–II evidence were included. Data regarding kinematic tests were extracted and included pivot-shift test, Lachman test, anterior drawer test, KT-1000 measurements, A–P laxity measures using navigation and total internal–external (IRER) laxity measured using navigation, as well as graft failure frequency.

Results

A total of 7,154 studies were identified of which 15 papers (8 randomized controlled trials and 7 prospective cohort studies, n = 970 patients) met the eligibility criteria. Anatomic ACL double-bundle reconstruction demonstrated less anterior laxity using KT-1000 arthrometer with a standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.36 (95 % CI 0.214–0.513, p < 0.001) and less A–P laxity measured with navigation (SMD = 0.29 95 % CI 0.01–0.565, p = 0.042). Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction did not lead to significant improvements in pivot-shift test, Lachman test, anterior drawer test, total IRER or graft failure rates compared to anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Conclusion

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction is superior to anatomic single-bundle reconstruction in terms of restoration of knee kinematics, primarily A–P laxity. Whether these improvements of laxity result in long-term improvement of clinical meaningful outcomes remains uncertain.

Level of evidence

II.     

Augmentation of femoral fixation in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bioabsorbable bead: a prospective single-blind randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The EndoPearl is an adjunct to bioabsorbable interference screw fixation in the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of the EndoPearl using the KT-1000 Knee Arthrometer and the Mohtadi ACL Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) Questionnaire. HYPOTHESIS: The application of the EndoPearl in hamstring ACL reconstruction has no significant benefit when compared to conventional treatment in KT-1000 and ACL-QOL Questionnaire outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective single-blind randomized clinical trial. METHODS: ACL reconstruction with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons was performed on 35 patients. Preoperatively, 3 months, 6 months, and 18 months postoperatively, patients' knees were evaluated using the KT-1000 Knee Arthrometer and the ACL-QOL Questionnaire. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were achieved in terms of KT-1000 side-to-side differences between the study group and the control group at 6 months and 18 months postoperatively; the mean side-to-side differences are significantly less in the study group when compared to the control group. Statistically significant differences were not detected when comparing the ACL-QOL Questionnaire between the two groups at all time intervals. CONCLUSION: The application of the EndoPearl in conjunction with a bioscrew in the femoral tunnel in autogenous ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts provides a significantly decreased laxity up to 18 months postoperatively in terms of KT-1000 side-to-side differences.     

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft directly fixed to cortical bone: 5-year results

Forty-three patients who had undergone an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a doubled semitendinosus and gracilis graft were prospectively reviewed at 5-year follow-up. All had suffered subacute or chronic tears of the ligament. At surgery, the femoral tunnel was drilled first through the antero-medial portal. The correct position of the femoral and tibial guide wire was checked fluoroscopically. A cortical fixation to the bone was achieved in the femur with a Mitek anchor, directly passing the two tendons in the slot of the anchor, and in the tibia with an RCI screw, supplemented with a spiked washer and bicortical screw. Rehabilitation was aggressive, controlled and without braces. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, KT-1000 arthrometer, and Cybex dynamometer were employed for clinical evaluation. A radiographic study was also performed. At the 5-year follow-up all the patients had recovered full range of motion and 2% of them complained of pain during light sports activities. Four patients (9.5%) reported giving-way symptoms. The KT-1000 side-to-side difference was on average 2.1 mm at 30 lb, and 68% of the knees were within 2 mm. The final IKDC score showed 90% satisfactory results. There was no difference between the 2-year and 5-year evaluations in terms of stability. Extensor and flexor muscle strength recovery was almost complete (maximum deficit 5%). Radiographic study showed a tunnel widening in 32% of the femurs and 40% of the tibias. A correlation was found between the incidence of tibial tunnel widening and the distance of the RCI screw from the joint (the closer the screw to the joint, the lower the incidence of widening). In conclusion, we can state that, using a four-strand hamstring graft and a cortical fixation at both ends, we were able to achieve satisfactory 5-year results in 90% of the patients.     

Comparison between hamstring autograft and free tendon Achilles allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton and Intrafix

Purpose  

This study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with four-stranded autogenous hamstring tendon and two-stranded free tendon Achilles allograft fixed with EndoButton in the femoral tunnel and Intrafix in the tibial tunnel.     

The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: tibial site

BACKGROUND: Tibial fixation is more problematic than femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: There is no difference in initial fixation strength among hamstring tendon graft tibial fixation devices. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized experimental study. METHODS: Each of six devices used to fix 120 quadrupled human semitendinosus-gracilis tendon grafts into porcine tibiae was tested 10 times with a single-cycle load-to-failure test and 10 times with a 1500-cycle loading test. Specimens surviving cyclic loading were subjected to a single-cycle load-to-failure test. RESULTS: Intrafix (1332 N) was the strongest in the single-cycle load-to-failure test, followed by WasherLoc (975 N), tandem spiked washer (769 N), SmartScrew ACL (665 N), BioScrew (612 N), and SoftSilk (471 N). After cyclic-loading tests, Intrafix showed the lowest residual displacement (1.5 mm) and was also strongest (1309 N) in the single-cycle load-to-failure test after the cyclic-loading test, followed by WasherLoc (3.2 mm; 917 N). CONCLUSION: The Intrafix provided clearly superior strength in the fixation of hamstring tendon grafts to the tibial drill hole. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Some caution may be warranted when using the implants that showed increased residual displacement, especially if aggressive rehabilitation is to be used. Preconditioning of the hamstring tendon graft-implant complex before tibial fixation is needed.     

The influence of tibial fixation on tunnel enlargement after hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The retrospective study was designed to evaluate tibial-tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Forty-three patients (43 knees) were enrolled, among whom a spiked washer was used for the tibial side fixation in 20 knees (Group SW) and the WasherLoc was used in 23 knees (Group WL). After an average 16 (range 12–32) months follow-up, the distance between the sclerotic margins of the tibial tunnel was measured at the joint level, and 1 and 2 cm distal to the joint level on the lateral view radiographs, from which the tibial-tunnel enlargement at each point (E1, E2, and E3 respectively) was determined. Anterior knee laxity was also measured using a KT-1000 or KT-2000 arthrometer at follow-up. E1, E2, and E3 were 2.3±1.3 mm (mean±standard deviation), 1.8±0.8 mm, and 1.5±0.8 mm respectively in Group SW, and 2.6±1.0 mm, 2.6±1.2 mm, and 2.9±1.6 mm in Group WL. Group WL had a larger mean value than Group SW at each level of measurement, with a statistically significant difference in E2 and E3. Fifty percent of the tunnels were the cone type in Group SW, whereas reversed cone-type tunnels were the most common (39%) in Group WL. The side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity was –0.6±5.2 mm in Group SW and 1.8±9.0 mm in Group WL, which was significantly different between the groups. No statistical relationship was found between tunnel enlargement and side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity in Group SW, whereas there was a slight negative correlation between E1 or E2 and anterior knee laxity in Group WL. It is possible that there is greater tension applied to the graft when the WasherLoc is used, which creates larger compressive forces on the posterior wall of the tibial tunnel by the graft. This was probably the reason for the greater tunnel enlargement and the high incidence of the reversed cone-type tunnel in Group WL.     

A medium to long-term follow-up of ACL reconstruction using double gracilis and semitendinosus grafts

This paper reports the results of our approach to ACL tears and knee laxity, based on 30 years of experience in ACL reconstruction with hamstrings and founded on the following cornerstones: the use of doubled semitendinosus and gracilis as a free graft; the use of an out-in technique for femoral drilling and of very strong and stiff fixation devices; the careful examination and repair or reconstruction of the lateral compartment in selected patients; and the use of unaggressive rehabilitation. We prospectively evaluated a series of 100 consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2001 and 2002. A clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at a minimum of 6 years. After 6 years, the International Knee Documentation Committee score demonstrated good-to-excellent results (A and B) in 98% of patients. However, arthrometric results using the KT-1000 demonstrated that 6/80 patients (7.5%) had >5 mm manual maximum side-to-side difference. The median Tegner activity score was 5 (range 1–9); the median Lysholm score was 96 (range 81–100); and the median subjective IKDC score was 94 (range 66–100). We reported 6/80 failures as revealed by a 2+ or 3+ pivot-shift test result and/or KT-1000 side-to-side difference of more than 5 mm. The IKDC score revealed excellent results in all women who underwent extra-articular tenodesis. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated early signs of osteoarthritis in 9% of patients.     

The effect of graft placement on the clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study

The effect of the graft placement on the clinical outcome of patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been studied sparsely. We conducted a prospective follow-up of 140 patients who underwent an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. One hundred and four of them (74%) could be examined at the 2-year follow-up. Clinical examination included Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee rating scores, arthrometric anterior–posterior knee laxity assessment, and muscle strength assessments. The graft placement was measured from lateral radiographs using a system recommended for measuring the attachment positions of the cruciate ligaments as well as a method called ‘the sumscore of the graft placement’, which takes into account both the femoral and the tibial graft placements simultaneously. The sumscore was smaller in knees with normal anterior–posterior knee laxity in the Lachman test (P = 0.002) and normal rotational knee laxity in the pivot shift test (P = 0.01) than in those with abnormal laxity. The tibial graft placement was more anterior when the Lachman test was normal (P = 0.04). The Lysholm score was better when the femoral graft placement was more posterior (r = −0.20, P = 0.04). The optimal femoral graft placement was between 25 and 29% of length of the femoral condyle along the Blumensaat’s line from posterior to anterior. The optimal tibial graft placement was between 32 and 37% of the length of the tibial plateau from the anterior corner, and the optimal sumscore was between 61 and 66. The sumscore and its components (the femoral and tibial graft placements) showed a clear association with the clinical outcome of the patients. The best outcome was achieved when the sumscore was small; that is the graft placement showed posterior enough in the femur, and anterior enough in the tibia.     

Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable cross-pin femoral fixation: a technical note

There are many methods for fixation of the posterior cruciate ligament grafts. We introduce a new surgical technique that provides more secure femoral and tibial fixation of a tibialis posterior allograft. The tendon was prepared as a four-stranded graft. The tibial tunnel was made using a standard trans-tibial technique. A femoral tunnel was prepared through a low anterolateral portal. The graft was inserted into the femoral tunnel through the anterolateral portal and TransFix (Arthrex, Naples, FL) was fixed at the femur. Four stands of the graft were passed through the tibial tunnel and IntraFix (DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA) was fixed at the tibia.     

A biomechanical comparison of initial soft tissue tibial fixation devices: the Intrafix versus a tapered 35-mm bioabsorbable interference screw

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical testing of the Intrafix device has not been performed using human tibiae. HYPOTHESIS: The Intrafix device would provide comparable or superior tibial fixation of a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft to a 35-mm-long bioabsorbable interference screw. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro, biomechanical study. METHODS: Eight paired human tibiae and 16 quadrupled hamstring tendon grafts were divided into 2 groups. Each quadrupled hamstring tendon graft was fixed in a tunnel sized to 0.5 mm graft diameter with either an Intrafix device or a screw. RESULTS: Displacement at failure was greater in the Intrafix group (17.3 +/- 4.6 mm versus 10.9 +/- 4.4 mm, P =.002). Load at failure (796 +/- 193 N versus 647 +/- 269 N), stiffness (49.2 +/- 21.9 N/mm versus 64.5 +/- 22 N/mm), and bone mineral density (0.74 +/- 0.15 gm/cm(3) versus 0.74 +/- 0.14 gm/cm(3)) did not display significant differences for the Intrafix device and the screw, respectively (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: Displacement at failure was greater for the Intrafix device. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Increased displacement at failure for the Intrafix group suggests slippage from sheath channel deployment. Concentric fixation may not occur when less than optimal tibial bone mineral density increases the difficulty of attaining precise sheath deployment and quadrupled hamstring tendon graft strand alignment.