Effects of morphine alone and in combination with naloxone or d-amphetamine on shock-maintained behavior in the squirrel monkey

Key-pressing behavior in the squirrel monkey was maintained under an 8-min fixed-interval (FI) schedule of electric-shock delivery. The acute i.m. administration of morphine prior to a daily session decreased response rates at doses of 1.0–3.0 mg/kg but had little systematic effect on rate at doses of 0.03–0.3 mg/kg. When naloxone was administered concomitantly with morphine prior to a session, 0.01 mg/kg naloxone required a three-fold increase in the dose of morphine necessary to obtain decreased response rates, 0.1 mg/kg naloxone required a 30-fold increase in morphine, and 1.0 mg/kg required more than a 30-fold increase in morphine. Moreover, the administration of naloxone with morphine resulted in increased rates of responding at certain combinations of doses of the two drugs. The administration of d-amphetamine (0.03 or 0.1 mg/kg) alone increased mean response rates under the FI schedule; when combined with 0.03–0.3 mg/kg morphine the increases in responding were greater than obtained with d-amphetamine alone. The negative slope of the linear regression lines relating the effects of morphine to control rates of responding engendered under the FI schedule was decreased when morphine was combined with naloxone, but not with d-amphetamine. These results show that naloxone, but not d-amphetamine, can antagonize the response-rate decreasing effect of morphine when responding in the squirrel monkey is maintained by response-produced electric shock.     

Comparison of the effects of morphine,pentazocine, cyclazocine and amphetamine on intracranial self-stimulation in the rat

Rats were trained to press a lever in order to stimulate their lateral hypothalamus through a chronically implanted electrode. Dose-response curves were determined for the effects of morphine (0.3–10 mg/kg), pentazocine (1.0–30 mg/kg), cyclazocine (0.03–3.0 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (0.1–3.0 mg/kg) on responding for intracranial stimulation, and then were redetermined in the presence of one or two doses of naloxone. The three analgesics produced only dose-related decreases in responding with the following relative potencies: cyclazocine>morphine>pentazocine. The well-documented rate-increasing effects of d-amphetamine on intracranial self-stimulation were observed at 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg of the drug; decreases in responding at 3.0 mg/kg were associated with stereotyped behavior. Naloxone, which had no effect of its own on self-stimulation, increased the dose of the analgesics required to depress response rate in a manner consistent with a competitive antagonism. In contrast, response rates were reduced at all doses of d-amphetamine tested in the presence of naloxone. Thus, the interaction between naloxone and d-amphetamine is qualitatively different from the one between naloxone and the analgesics. This finding extends to intracranial self-stimulation the generality of a previous report of interactions between d-amphetamine and naloxone on behavior in the rat.Publication No. 1303 of the Division of Basic Health Sciences of Emory University. This investigation was supported by USPHS Grant DA-00541.Recipient of Research Scientist Development Award K02-DA00008.     

Effects of d-amphetamine,morphine, naloxone,and drug combinations on visual discrimination in rats

The effects of d-amphetamine, morphine, and naloxone on visual discrimination were investigated using a two-choice discrete-trial procedure in which rats were trained to discriminate the position of a lightflash. Morphine (0.3–5.6 mg/kg) but not amphetamine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) caused a significant dose-dependent disruption in discriminative performance. Both amphetamine and morphine increased response latencies. Naloxone (1.0 mg/kg) prevented the disruption of any aspect of performance by up to 100 mg/kg morphine. Performance after naloxone/amphetamine co-administration was not significantly different from that observed after amphetamine alone. Naloxone alone (0.3–10 mg/kg) had no effect on discrimination, spatial bias or response latencies. These results suggest that morphine and amphetamine affect different components of discrimination performance. Offprint requests to: S.G. Holzman     

Failure of naloxone to modify the effects of chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on avoidance behavior in the squirrel monkey

Lever-pressing by squirrel monkeys was maintained under a continuous avoidance schedule in which each response postponed for 30 s the delivery of an electric shock to the tail. Dose-response curves were determined for chlorpromazine (0.03–0.3 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (0.03–1.0 mg/kg) administered alone and administered concomitantly with 1.0 or 10 mg/kg of aaloxone. The dose-response curves for chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine were similar to those previously reported for monkeys under other schedules of shock-maintained behavior: Chlorpromazine decreased responding in a dose-related manner while d-amphetamine increased responding at low doses and disrupted behavior at the highest dose. Naloxone did not modify the effects of chlorpromazine, and d-amphetamine. These results suggest that interactions observed previously between naloxone and nonopiate drugs on behavior in pigeons and rodents are not general phenomena in all animal species.     

Effects of d-amphetamine and ethanol alone and in combination on schedule-controlled responding of pigeons

Key pecking by pigeons was maintained under either a 5-min fixed-interval or a 30-response fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery. d-Amphetamine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) either increased or did not affect overall rates of responding under the fixed-interval schedule; the lowest dose of ethanol (0.5 g/kg) did not affect or slightly decreased response rates, whereas higher doses (1.0–2.0 g/kg) substantially decreased rates. Combinations of low noneffective ethanol doses with most doses of d-amphetamine increased rates of responding under the fixed-interval schedule above those obtained with d-amphetamine alone; decreases produced by the higher doses of ethanol were attenuated by most doses of d-amphetamine. Doses of d-amphetamine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) and ethanol (0.5–1.5 g/kg) alone generally had no effect on responding maintained under the fixed-ratio schedule; higher doses of these drugs decreased responding. The effects of dose combinations other than the highest ones generally differed little from those obtained with ethanol alone; the effects of high doses of each drug were antagonized by low to moderate doses of the other. Combinations of ethanol with d-amphetamine can result in higher rates of responding than are obtained with either drug alone. Further, effects of the drugs alone and in combination depend on the schedule under which behavior is maintained.     

Dose- and time-dependent effects of narcotic analgesics on intracranial self-stimulation in the rat

Rats were trained to bar-press in order to obtain electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle through chronically implanted electrodes. Dose-response and time-effect curves were determined for morphine (1.0–30 mg/kg), levorphanol (0.1 to 3.0 mg/kg), methadone (0.1–3.0 mg/kg), meperidine (1.0–30 mg/kg), oxymorphone (0.03–1.0 mg/kg), and d-amphetamine (0.1–3.0 mg/kg). Dose-response and time-effect curves were also determined for morphine (1.0–30 mg/kg) in rats that had received multiple injections of morphine over a period of 3 days. All of the narcotic analgesics produced dose-related decreases in responding; the durations of these decreases were also dose-related. The relative potencies of the five narcotic analgesics with respect to the rate-decreasing effects for self-stimulation responding were: oxymorphone > levorphanol > methadone > morphine > meperidine. In morphine-tolerant rats the rate-decreasing effects of morphine on responding for self-stimulation were attenuated. These findings suggest that narcotic analgesics from diverse chemical families have a similar, predominantly depressant, effect on self-stimulation behavior and that the relative potencies of a series of narcotics for this effect are similar to those demonstrated for other properties of these drugs.     

Antagonism of the behavioral effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine by prazosin

Key pecking by pigeons was maintained under a 30-response fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery; lever pressing by squirrel monkeys was maintained under a 3-min fixed-interval schedule of food delivery. Administered alone, d-amphetamine (0.1–3.0 mg/kg), cocaine (1.0–3.0 mg/kg) and bupropion (1.0–30 mg/kg) either did not affect or decreased fixed-ratio responding of pigeons, whereas d-amphetamine (0.056–0.3 mg/kg) either increased or decreased (0.56 mg/kg) responding of monkeys maintained under the fixed-interval schedule. Prazosin, a selective centrally-active alpha₁ antagonist, produced a dose-dependent reversal of the rate-decreasing effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine but not of bupropion on fixed-ratio responding in pigeons. Prazosin also reversed both the rate-increasing and rate-decreasing effects of d-amphetamine on fixed-interval responding of squirrel monkeys. In contrast, the non-selective alpha-antagonist phentolamine enhanced d-amphetamine-induced decreases in fixed-ratio responding. These findings suggest that the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine are produced at least in part by activation of central alpha₁ receptors. Prazosin may be a useful tool for better understanding the mechanisms through which cocaine, amphetamine, and other abused stimulant drugs exert their potent behavioral effects.     

Effects of d-amphetamine and naloxone on brain stimulation reward

Self-stimulation thresholds were determined in rats by means of a modification of the psychophysical method of limits. Reinforcement values were determined after the administration of d-amphetamine alone, naloxone alone, and naloxone administered concurrently with d-amphetamine. d-Amphetamine yielded dose-related decreases in the threshold (0.25–2.00 mg/kg IP), while naloxone alone (2.0–16 mg/kg IP) caused no consistent changes. For each animal, a dose of d-amphetamine that substantially lowered the threshold was then selected to be administered with varying doses of naloxone. The threshold-lowering effect of d-amphetamine was blocked by naloxone at doses as low as 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg. This finding suggests the possible involvement of an opiate receptor in the mediation of the enhancement by d-amphetamine of brain stimulation reward.     

Amphetamine and the reward system: Evidence for tolerance and post-drug depression

Existing reports of tolerance to the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine are most parsimoniously interpreted as reflecting behavioral adaptation to the disruptive effects of the drug rather than physiological tolerance. The present study shows that physiological tolerance does develop to the facilitation of self-stimulation behavior which the drug produces. Rats were trained to bar-press for electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle and tested for facilitation of responding following the administration of 0.25 or 0.50 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Testing was terminated for 4 days during which increasing doses (1.0–12.0 mg/kg) of the drug were given. 16 h after the last injection, the test doses (0.25 or 0.50 mg/kg) no longer produced facilitation of self-stimulation. In addition, testing on the following day with no further drug administration showed a depression of responding indicating depression of the sensitivity of the reward system of the brain.     

Effects of d-amphetamine,scopolamine, chlordiazepoxide and diphenylhydantoin on self-stimulation behavior and brain acetylcholine

The effects of d-amphetamine (0.25–8), scopolamine (0.25–8), chlordiazepoxide (2.5–40), and diphenylhydantoin (25–75), given i.p. or s.c. on a mg/kg basis, were studied on self-stimulation behavior in the male albino rat. The dose-effect relationships, the role of baseline rates of responding and their effects on brain acetylcholine (ACh) were determined in rats trained to self-stimulate for electrical reward in the lateral posterior hypothalamus. The effects of d-amphetamine were both dose and baseline-rate dependent. Low-moderate doses (0.5–2.0 mg/kg inclusive) facilitated self-stimulation and larger doses (2.0 to 8.0 mg/kg) depressed responding. Baseline rates before d-amphetamine administration were extremely important in the effect observed. Low rates of responding were facilitated and high rates were depressed by this agent. The effects of scopolamine in a wide range of dosage were less consistent. A small dose (0.5 mg/kg) facilitated only transiently self-stimulation and larger doses (1–8 mg/kg) tended to depress this behavior. Baseline rate effects were less important but high-rate responders were usually depressed by scopolamine.The effects of chlordiazepoxide were dose-dependent. A dose of (5 mg/kg) caused facilitation but larger doses (10–40 mg/kg) produced depression of selfstimulation irrespective of baseline rates. However, high-rate stimulators showed the most dramatic increases with 5 mg/kg of chlordiazepoxide. In contrast, diphenylhydantoin (25–75 mg/kg) usually depressed self-stimulation. Low rate self-stimulators showed the most marked depressant effects.Brain ACh was progressively reduced by handling of naive animals, injection of saline, and 1/2 h of self-stimulation and escape behavior. Animals not allowed to self-stimulate but given d-amphetamine (2.0 mg/kg), scopolamine (2.0 mg/kg) showed a significant decrease in brain ACh. Self-stimulation, in addition to medication with the various drugs, showed a trend for further reduction in brain ACh but the differences were not statistically significant.Supported in part by Grant MH-11846 (to EID) and MH-11627 (to JO), U.S. Public Health Service.     

Interactions of clonidine and naloxone on schedule-controlled behavior in opioid-naive mice

Schedule-controlled responding was maintained under a fixed-ratio schedule in mice. Administered alone, clonidine, morphine and naloxone produced dose-related decreases in rates of responding, with clonidine about 100 times more potent than morphine which was about ten times more potent than naloxone. Decreases in response rates produced by high doses of naloxone were antagonized by clonidine (0.003–0.1 mg/kg) in a dose-dependent manner; however, decreases in response rates produced by clonidine (0.3 mg/kg) were not antagonized by naloxone (1.0–100 mg/kg). Effects of high doses of naloxone (100 mg/kg) were not antagonized by morphine (1.0–100 mg/kg) whereas effects of morphine (17.0 mg/kg) were antagonized by naloxone (0.01–1.0 mg/kg). Thus, clonidine can reverse behavior-disrupting effects of naloxone in non-dependent subjects, indicating that at least some of the interactions of these two drugs are not specific to the opioid-dependent state.     

Potentiation of morphine analgesia by d-amphetamine

Rats were trained to escape from aversive electrical brain stimulation delivered to the mesencephalic reticular formation (MRF). The threshold for this escape behavior was determined by a modification of the classic psychophysical method of limits. Escape thresholds were determined after the administration of morphine alone, d-amphetamine alone, and the combination of d-amphetamine and an ineffective dose of morphine. Morphine alone caused a dose-dependent raising of the escape threshold (1.0–16.0 mg/kg IP) while d-amphetamine alone (0.06–2.0 mg/kg IP) had no effect or caused a slight lowering of threshold. For each animal, a dose of morphine that produced no change in escape threshold was then selected to be administered concomitantly with various doses of d-amphetamine. The co-administration of morphine and d-amphetamine resulted in a significant, dose-dependent increase in the escape threshold, which was not seen with d-amphetamine alone and was as great or greater in magnitude than the increase seen with the highest dose of morphine tested. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that opiate analgesia is potentiated by concomitant d-amphetamine administration. The mechanisms involved in this potentiation warrant further investigation for the clinical management of pain.     

Naloxone effects on schedule-controlled behavior in morphine-pelleted rats

The effects of morphine pellet implantation and naloxone administration were examined in rats lever pressing under inter-response time schedules of food presentation. Subcutaneous implantation of a morphine pellet initially decreased lever-pressing rates. Tolerance to this effect developed within 3–4 days. Naloxone (0.25–1.0 mg/kg) decreased response rates in morphine-pelleted rats in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner. All doses of naloxone severely decreased rates of lever pressing on days four to nine post-pellet. This rate-decreasing effect persisted 7–17 days for 0.25 mg/kg naloxone, 9–22 days for 0.50 mg/kg, and 13–28 days for 1.0 mg/kg. Decreases in response rate were due to an increased frequency of long pauses and not to marked shifts in the temporal patterning of those lever presses that did occur. Changes in response rate after naloxone were accompanied by body weight loss. Area values summarizing the naloxone-induced changes in response rate or body weight over time after pellet implantation increased as a function of naloxone dose. Naloxone (0.25–1.0 mg/kg) did not alter performance by placebo-pelleted rats.     

Some behavioral effects of repeated d-amphetamine administrations

Effects of daily administrations of d-amphetamine were studied on key peck responses of pigeons maintained under a multiple fixed-interval 2-min, fixed-ratio 30-responseschedule. Under the fixed-interval schedule, a pause was followed by a transition to increasing rates of responding until food presentation. Under the fixed-ratio schedule, higher sustained rates of responding were maintained. Low to intermediate doses (0.3-1.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine changed the temporal patterns and occasionally increased rates of responding under the fixed-interval schedule. Higher doses decreased rates of responding under bothschedules. With daily injections of 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine prior to experimental sessions, the effects of this dose on rates and patterns of responding were attenuated, and d-anphetamine dose-effect curves were shifted to the right, primarily under the fixed-ratio schedule. Similar results were obtained with daily presession injections of 5.6 mg/kg d-amphetamine in a second group of pigeons, except that rates of responding under both schedules were decreased by this daily dose, and did not return completely to control values with repeated injections. In a third group of pigeons, 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine administered daily, after experimental sessions, did not alter dose-effect functions for d-amphetamine. In a second experiment, pigeons were trained to peck one response key when given 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine and a different key when given presession water injections. Increasing doses of d-amphetamine produced incresing percentages of d-amphetamine-key responses. Repeated administration of 5.6 mg/kg d-amphetamine shifted these dose-effect functions to the right one-half log unit. Results suggested that decreases in reinforcement frequency are not a necessary condition for the development of behavioral tolerance to d-amphetamine.     

Tolerance to effects of morphine without cross tolerance to effects of clonidine on schedule-controlled behavior of pigeons

Schedule-controlled responding was maintained under a multiple fixed-interval, fixed-ratio schedule in pigeons. Dose-related decreases in response rates were produced by clonidine (0.001–0.1 mg/kg) and morphine (0.3–5.6 mg/kg). Chronic administration of morphine produced (1) tolerance to effects of morphine, as evidenced by a decrease in potency of morphine and (2) sensitivity to opioid antagonists, as evidenced by an increase in potency of naloxone. Dose-effect curves for clonidine were not appreciably altered by chronic morphine administration. Offprint requests to: J.L. Katz     

Role of specific dopamine receptor subtypes in amphetamine discrimination

Biochemical, electrophysiological, and behavioral experiments suggest that the dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptor subtypes functionally interact. In rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine, substitution with the D-2 agonist quinpirole (0.1–2.0 mg/kg) produces amphetaminelever responding, whereas the D-1 agonist SKF 38393 (0.3–10.0 mg/kg) elicits only saline-appropriate responding. Combining either quinpirole (0.05–0.5 mg/kg) or SKF 38393 (0.5–10.0 mg/kg) with 0.3 mg/kg d-amphetamine results in dose-dependent increases in amphetamine-lever responding. Conversely, the D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 (0.02–0.1 mg/kg) antagonizes the discrimination produced by 0.7 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Additional combination studies examined the effect of DA receptor drugs on discrimination when quinpirole is substituted in d-amphetamine trained rats. SKF 38393 (0.5–7.0 mg/kg) fails to increase the amphetamine-appropriate lever response produced by either 0.05 or 0.2 mg/kg quinpirole. Similarly, SCH 23390 (0.01–0.1 mg/kg) fails to antagonize the amphetamine-lever responding produced by either 0.2 or 0.5 mg/kg quinpirole. Haloperidol (0.02–0.2 mg/kg) does antagonize the amphetamine-appropriate response produced by quinpirole substitution. The d-amphetamine discrimination studies indicate that stimulating D-2 receptors alone or D-1 receptors in the presence of d-amphetamine yields d-amphetamine-lever responding, and suggests that D-1/D-2 receptors can functionally interact to alter discrimination behavior. Quinpirole substitution, on the other hand, shows an insensitivity to D-1 receptor manipulations.     

Effects of triadimefon on a multiple schedule of fixed-interval performance: Comparison with methylphenidate, d-amphetamine and chlorpromazine

Triadimefon is a fungicide that has recently been shown to increase motor activity and rates of schedule-controlled responding. These findings indicate that triadimefon resembles psychomotor stimulants and in this respect is a unique pesticide. The present experiment was designed to evaluate triadimefon's effects on performance maintained by a multiple schedule of reinforcement and to compare triadimefon to known psychomotor stimulants. Four rats were trained to perform under a mult FI 1-min FI 5-min schedule of milk reinforcement. They then received a series of dosages of triadimefon (10–170 mg/kg, IP) and of methylphenidate (1–17.3 mg/kg, IP) in a counterbalanced order. Triadimefon increased response rates in both the FI 1-min and FI 5-min components. Methylphenidate did not consistently alter response rates in either component. Temporal patterns of responding were disrupted much more in the FI 5-min component than in the FI 1-min component by both triadimefon and methylphenidate. Performances were then evaluated following a series of dosages of d-amphetamine (0.3–3.0 mg/kg, IP) and chlorpromazine (0.5–2.0 mg/kg, IP). Response rates were increased d-amphetamine in the FI 1-min component but not in the FI 5-min component. Like triadimefon and methylphenidate, d-amphetamine produced a greater disruption of response patterning in FI 5-min than in FI 1-min. Only chlorpromazine decreased response rates in both components. Chlorpromazine also disrupted FI 5-min response patterning, but left FI 1-min patterning intact. Although triadimefon did not closely resemble any of the comparison drugs, it had opposite effects on response rates from chlorpromazine in both components of the schedule and resembled d-amphetamine in its effects on FI 1-min response rates. The rate-increasing effects frequently obtained with psychomotor stimulants were more evident for triadimefon than for either methylphenidate or d-amphetamine.     

Drug effects on the performance of pigeons under a negative automaintenance schedule

Pigeons were exposed to a negative automaintenance schedule in which food was delivered following brief key illumination only if the illuminated key was not contacted; contact of the lighted key prevented food delivery. All subjects emitted some responses under this procedure when drugs were not given. However, the number of responses was less than that which occurred under an automaintenance procedure in which food followed key illumination regardless of the bird's behavior. Under the negative automaintenance procedure, acute administration of atropine (0.01–0.1 mg/kg), d-amphetamine (0.4–1.6 mg/kg), and morphine (3.8–15 mg/kg) reduced in a dose-dependent manner the percentage of key illuminations in which subjects contacted the lighted key. Diazepam (1.0–6.0 mg/kg) increased the percentage of key illuminations during which contact responses occurred.     

Application of fixed-interval schedules to intracranial self-stimulation for assessing psychomotor stimulants

Rats were implanted with stimulating electrodes aimed at the medial forebrain bundlelateral hypothalamus (MFB-LH) and were trained to lever-press for brain stimulation on a fixed-interval 15-sec schedule of reinforcement. When behavior had stabilized, the animals were tested with graded doses of d-amphetamine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg), cocaine (3.0–30 mg/kg), and nomifensine (1.0–10 mg/kg). Separate groups of animals were tested in a locomotor activity procedure over the same dose ranges. All three drugs produced graded increases in rates of responding which ranged from 180–295% of saline control levels following the highest dose of each drug. In contrast, there were no significant changes in numbers of reinforcements at any of the doses used. When tested in a locomotor activity device, all three drugs produced similar increases in activity with increasing dosage. Although currently little used, the fixed-interval schedule of brain self-stimulation can be helpful in making comparisons of the stimulant properties of abused drugs, such as amphetamine and cocaine, and less well-known drugs with abuse potential such as nomifensine. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Shifting of the d-amphetamine dose-response curve in rats with frontal cortical ablations

Rats trained to bar-press on a FI 15 sec schedule for water reinforcement were administered various doses of d-amphetamine (0.25–4.0 mg/kg) both before and 6–8 weeks after bilateral ablation of frontal cortex. Preoperatively, low doses (e.g. 0.25–0.5 mg/kg) of (d-amphetamine increased responding and high doses (e.g. 2.0–4.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine depressed responding. Postoperatively, frontal rats showed larger facilitatory effects in response to low doses of d-amphet-amine but lesser depressant effects in response to high doses of d-amphetamine; the whole dose-response curve was generally shifted higher by the frontal lesions. These results indicate that frontal lesions differentially influence mechanisms mediating two different actions of d-amphetamine.This research was supported by NIMH grant MH21156 and NIMH Research Scientist Development Award (Type 2) DA70082 to S. D. Glick.