A phase I study of weekly topotecan and Paclitaxel in previously treated epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients

OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported on the feasibility of weekly topotecan as single-agent therapy in previously treated patients with ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly bolus intravenous (IV) topotecan combined with weekly paclitaxel in a comparable patient population. METHODS: Previously treated ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease and/or elevated cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) received (as second-line or third-line therapy) weekly 30-min bolus IV topotecan starting at 2 mg/m(2) combined with weekly paclitaxel starting at a dose of 60 mg/m(2). In this intrapatient dose-escalation study, topotecan and paclitaxel were escalated in parallel until the MTD was reached, defined as the first dose level at which >or= 2 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 26 patients were evaluable for toxicity and received a total of 306 weeks of therapy (median, 13 weeks; range, 5 to 33 weeks). No significant dose-limiting toxicity was observed up to a weekly bolus IV topotecan dose of 3 mg/m(2) and a concurrent paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m(2). The MTD was topotecan 3.5 mg/m(2) plus 90 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicities included anemia and fatigue, with 10 of 21 patients receiving epoetin alfa for grade 3 or 4 anemia; only 1 patient required a blood transfusion. Two patients had a treatment delay of at least 1 week and only 1 patient required a dose reduction to maintain the weekly schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, the recommended initial dose for this novel regimen is topotecan 3 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2). Further investigation of the efficacy of weekly topotecan plus paclitaxel in less heavily pretreated patients is warranted.     

Phase I study of alternating doublets of topotecan/carboplatin and paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate topotecan with carboplatin in an alternating doublet with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer were studied. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) in an alternating doublet regimen was determined through standard dose escalation in cohorts of three; doses of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 to 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), cycles 2, 4, 6, 8) were fixed. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined only for cycle 1 as febrile neutropenia, prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, > or =grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, or failure to recover in < or =7 days. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 142 cycles of topotecan/carboplatin. Hematologic DLTs included grade 4 neutropenia (59 events, 42% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (32 events, 23% of cycles). Granulocytopenia was generally short-lived, and only 2 cases of febrile neutropenia occurred. The MTD was 1.0 mg/m(2)/day topotecan and carboplatin AUC 4, alternating with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and carboplatin AUC 4. Although G-CSF effectively managed myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia developed in later cycles, limiting further topotecan dose escalation. The median progression-free survival was 20.5 months, and elevated pretreatment CA-125 levels normalized in 29 of 34 (85%) patients. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a reasonably well-tolerated alternating doublet regimen, coupled with evidence of antitumor activity, provides the basis for further investigation of topotecan in first-line therapy of ovarian cancer. Topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days) was chosen for further evaluation in a phase II study.     

A new therapeutical approach: topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum

AIM: Topotecan and gemcitabine have demonstrated mono-activity against recurrent ovarian cancer. Both drugs affect DNA replication; in addition, topotecan inhibits DNA repair. Based on the efficacy profiles and different mechanisms of action, a phase-I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (day 1-5) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in combination with gemcitabine (day 1 + 8) every 21 days. METHODS: Three to six patients were treated per dose-level. Patients with ovarian cancer who had failed a platinum and paclitaxel-containing therapy were enrolled. No individual dose escalation or use of cytokines were allowed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. Fifty percent of all patients were pretreated with at least two platinum-containing therapies. Eighty courses were assessable for toxicity. The MTD was reached at a dosage of 0.75 mg/m2 topotecan in combination with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Thrombocytopenia and leucopenia were the major DLTs. The dose for phase-II trials is 0.50 mg/m2 topotecan given with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. In this dose-level only one related non-haematological adverse event > grade 2 was observed (grade 3 mycotic stomatitis) and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred. Responses were observed in six patients and stable disease in four out of 12 assessable patients. Median survival time was 15.3 (95% CI: 13.21-28.64) months. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate feasibility and the tolerability of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Based on these results a phase-II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this new combination.     

A phase I/II trial of weekly topotecan and carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan and carboplatin are active in relapsed ovarian cancer, but attempts to combine these agents are limited by myelotoxicity. This phase I/II trial combined weekly topotecan, which is less myelosuppressive than the standard 5-day regimen, with carboplatin in patients with potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma (PS-OVCa/PCa). METHODS: Eligible patients had PS-OVCa/PCa, performance status 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic functions. On day 1 of a 21-day cycle, patients received carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5) followed by topotecan 2.0 mg/m2, both via 30-min intravenous infusion. Topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 also was administered on days 8 and 15. Treatment was withheld for neutropenia or thrombocytopenia on day 8 or 15. Dose escalation was planned. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received a total of 115 (median, 6) cycles of chemotherapy. With carboplatin AUC 4, neutropenia prevented dose escalation of topotecan; hematologic toxicity caused 34/105 (32%) weekly treatments to be withheld. However, carboplatin could be dose escalated to AUC 5 when the day 15 dose of topotecan was withheld. In the intent-to-treat population, there were 4 (24%) complete and 9 (53%) partial responses, 2 (12%) patients (at the carboplatin AUC 4 dose) with stable disease, and 2 (12%) nonevaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1 in combination with topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle is well tolerated and active in patients with PS-OVCa/PCa. A phase II trial comparing this with other carboplatin therapeutic doublets in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is warranted.     

Improved therapeutic index of lower dose topotecan chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)) administered daily for 5 consecutive days of a 21-day cycle is an established chemotherapeutic regimen in recurrent ovarian cancer. However, noncumulative myelosuppression has limited its use by many clinicians. We sought to determine whether a lower dose of topotecan could provide comparable tumor activity and higher tolerability in pretreated ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer patients with measurable disease or elevated cancer antigen 125 levels (evaluable disease). Patients were treated with topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2)) given by 30-min intravenous infusion for 5 consecutive days every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Treatment records from 37 women who had been treated with a median of 3 courses (range, 1 to 17) of lower dose topotecan were evaluated; all were evaluable for tolerability and 36 were evaluable for response. Patients had received a median of 3 (range, 1 to 6) previous treatments. The overall response rate was 22% (8/36); the response rates for patients with evaluable disease and measurable disease were 35.7 (5/14) and 13.6% (3/22), respectively. An additional 8 patients (22%) achieved stable disease. Grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 48.6, 5.4, and 5.4% of patients, respectively. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was used in 37% of patients, including 5 who experienced febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Topotecan at 1.0 mg/m(2) x 5 days every 21 days is active in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer, with significant improvements in hematologic toxicity. In heavily pretreated patients-topotecan can be safely given at reduced doses without apparent loss of efficacy.     

Weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To investigate weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: The records of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated with weekly topotecan after failure of > or =1 prior regimen were reviewed. Patients received topotecan (median starting dose approximately 2.5 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Antitumor response was assessed after 2 cycles by serial CA-125 levels. RESULTS: Thirty-five heavily pretreated patients received a mean of 5 cycles of topotecan (range, 1-13 cycles). Thirty-two patients had definable platinum sensitivity (16 sensitive, 8 resistant, 8 refractory). Median age was 56 years. A total of 177 cycles (534 weeks) of topotecan was administered. Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, and no grade 4 toxicities were observed. Grade 3 hematologic toxicity, including leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, was observed in 2, 2, 1, and 0 patients, respectively. No patients experienced grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity. Based on serial CA-125 measurements, there were 1 (3%) complete and 5 (15%) partial responses, with 1 of the partial responses in a patient with platinum-refractory disease. Stable disease was reported in 13 (38%) patients, including 5 patients with platinum-resistant/refractory disease. CONCLUSION: Weekly topotecan demonstrates activity and is well tolerated compared with historical data with the standard 5-day schedule. Higher doses may be warranted because of the high tolerability shown for weekly topotecan. Weekly topotecan may be an appropriate treatment option for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, especially heavily pretreated patients who might require dosing schedules with improved tolerability.     

Efficacy and tolerability of lower-dose topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer: a retrospective case review

Topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days of a 21-day cycle) is an established recurrent ovarian cancer treatment, but myelosuppression can be dose limiting. This study evaluates the activity and tolerability of low-dose topotecan in our clinical experience. Case records were reviewed for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in first through third relapse. Eligible patients had received > or =2 cycles of < or =1.25 mg/m(2) topotecan. Adverse events were evaluated using laboratory and clinical evaluation data. Twenty-seven eligible patients, most with advanced disease, received a total of 209 cycles (median, six cycles). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during 184 cycles in 24 assessed patients were neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia in 35%, 28%, 36%, and 11% of cycles, and 21, 19, 16, and 10 patients, respectively. Only four grade 4 toxicities occurred: anemia (one) and thrombocytopenia (three). Myelosuppression was reversible, noncumulative, and manageable. Moreover, nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild to moderate, and the only two grade 3 events were constipation and deep vein thrombosis. Low-dose topotecan was active in this setting. Lower-dose topotecan is generally well tolerated and active in patients with pretreated ovarian cancer. Prospective clinical trials of low-dose topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer are warranted.     

Phase I/II study of tandem cycles of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell support in women with advanced ovarian cancer

The objectives of this study were to investigate the tolerability of a novel high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) regimen with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support in patients with pretreated advanced ovarian cancer and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan in this setting. Advanced ovarian cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based first-line therapy were enrolled. After PBPC mobilization and harvesting, patients received three consecutive cycles of HDC with PBPC support. Cycle 1 was carboplatin area under the concentration curve 20 and paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2). Cycle 2 was topotecan starting at 5 mg/m(2), dose escalated in 2 mg/m(2) increments, and etoposide 600 mg/m(2). Cycle 3 was thiotepa 500 mg/m(2). After each cycle, PBPCs were infused. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (5 microg/kg/day) was administered until neutrophil recovery occurred. Seventeen patients were enrolled; all were safety evaluable. The most common nonhematologic toxicity was grade 3 mucositis (44%). Engraftment of PBPCs was successful in all patients after each cycle, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Of 14 patients with measurable disease, 5 (36%) had complete responses, 2 (14%) had partial responses, and 4 (29%) had stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 7 and 18 months, respectively. The MTD of topotecan was not reached. The tolerability and activity of this regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer warrant further investigation.     

A phase I trial of a 3-day topotecan Q 21 days for recurrent epithelial cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum

OBJECTIVE: This trial was undertaken to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan that can be administered for 3 days q 21 days. A 3-day schedule is more convenient and less expensive than standard 5-day dosing. METHODS: Patients with recurrent epithelial ovary, tubal, or peritoneal carcinoma were treated with escalating doses of topotecan beginning at 2.50 mg/m(2) as an outpatient days 1-3 q 21 days. Colony stimulating factors were not employed prophylactically, but could be added for grade 4 marrow toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty patients with a median age of 61 (range 46-80) and performance status of 0 or 1 were entered. All patients had received at least one prior paclitaxel/platinum regimen; 6 had received two. Ninety-one cycles were delivered (median = 6) and 98.9% were on schedule. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 17 of 20 patients (85%) in cycle 1 and in 38 of 91 (41.8%) total cycles. Sixteen of 20 patients (80%) started G-CSF on cycle 2. Two of 91 (2.2%) cycles had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Four cycles (4.4%) were associated with febrile neutropenia. Two patients experienced grade 4 neurotoxicity (DLT) at 4.25 mg/m(2). Other nonhematologic toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan can be safely administered on schedule as an outpatient days 1-3 q 21 days. Neurotoxicity was the DLT when G-CSF was added; the MTD was 3.75 mg/m(2). There was minimal other nonhematologic toxicity. Neutropenia was predictable and easily managed with G-CSF. Febrile neutropenia was uncommon and thrombocytopenia was rare at the doses evaluated.     

Phase II evaluation of 3-day topotecan with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a 3-day topotecan administration schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent measurable ovarian cancer who had up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for the management of their disease participating in this phase II trial were to receive topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days in combination with cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m(2) on Day 1 every 21 days. Dose escalation and reductions were permitted. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (median age = 65; range 37-84) were treated with this combination regimen. Seventeen were platinum-sensitive and 19 were platinum-resistant. A total of 169 cycles of chemotherapy was administered (median = 4; range 1-10). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (68.6%), neutropenic fever (7.1%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (18.3%), and requirement for blood transfusion (19.5%). Dose escalation was possible in 3 (8.3%), and dose reduction was required in 14 (38.9%) patients. Overall response rate was 25 and 44.5% stable disease. Median progression-free interval and overall survival was 5.4 and 23.5 months, respectively, independent of platinum sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The 3-day topotecan schedule in combination with cyclophosphamide appears to have good activity in recurrent ovarian cancer regardless of platinum sensitivity. Neutropenia was the only severe toxicity and was less prevalent than other reported trials of topotecan. This tolerable regimen offers patients more convenience and appears to have moderate activity.     

Weekly topotecan for recurrent endometrial cancer: a case series and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in ovarian and endometrial cancers when administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Recently, topotecan has been studied on a weekly dosing schedule for the treatment of ovarian cancer and found to have efficacy with reduced toxicity. The aim of this study is to review the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) experience with weekly topotecan dosing in women with recurrent endometrial cancer. We have included a review of the literature of weekly topotecan in the treatment of patients with gynecologic cancer. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we identified all women with recurrent endometrial cancer treated with topotecan at MSKCC from May 1996 to February 2004. Patients treated on a weekly schedule were assessed for toxicity and response. A review of the literature pertaining to weekly topotecan in the treatment of endometrial cancer was also performed. RESULTS: Eleven patients were treated with weekly topotecan during the study period, with doses ranging from 2.5-4.0 mg/m(2) on a 2- or 3-week schedule with 1 week off. The median age of the patients was 60 years old (range, 47-76 years), and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80%. Six of the 11 patients were previously treated with more than three chemotherapy regimens and eight had received prior pelvic radiation. Ninety-seven percent of treatment doses were delivered as scheduled, and only two patients required dose reductions. One patient achieved a prolonged partial response for 54 weeks, and two patients had stabilization of disease for 15 weeks each. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan has antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, including those patients with multiple prior treatments. Topotecan on a weekly bolus schedule should be evaluated in prospective trials to better establish its role in the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer.     

Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer

PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule (in contrast to the "standard" 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days q 21 days) in the management of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinically defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer participating in this phase 2 trial conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center received topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days on a 21-day schedule. Both dose escalations and reductions were permitted in the protocol design. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (median age: 61; range: 43-80) were treated with this modified topotecan schedule. These individuals had received a median of two prior regimens (range: 1-4) (retreatment with a platinum agent or paclitaxel considered a single regimen). The median number of topotecan courses delivered was 3 (range: 1-7). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (24% of patients); neutropenic fever (10%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%); and requirement for blood transfusion (14%). Dose escalation was possible, and dose reductions required, in 14 and 28% of patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited evidence of a clinically relevant response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This 3-day topotecan program is more convenient and less toxic than the standard 5-day regimen. The limited level of activity observed is not inconsistent with that previously reported for the 5-day topotecan infusion schedule in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Further investigation will be required to document the clinical utility of a 3-day topotecan schedule in a less heavily pretreated and more chemosensitive patient population.     

The addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer; is it possible only with peripheral blood stem cell support?

A phase I study was performed in order to evaluate the tolerability of the combination of fixed doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel and escalated doses of topotecan as first line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Three stage III and one stage IV patients entered the study. The dose limiting toxicity (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) was reached at the first dose level: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, carboplatin AUC 5 on day I and topotecan 0.5 mg/m2 daily from day 1 to day 3. We conclude that it is not possible to add topotecan to standard regimens of carboplatin and paclitaxel without bone marrow support.     

A phase II clinical trial of topotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

A phase II clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topotecan and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was the objective of this study. Patients had histologically confirmed ovarian epithelial cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 3 every 21 days for six cycles. All 42 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was six. Overall response rate was 71%, with 19 clinical complete responses (45%) and 11 clinical partial responses (26%). Median survival time was 47 months and 5-year survival was 42%. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 100% of patients. However, this toxicity was transient and easily manageable; no patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The combination of topotecan and carboplatin is active in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Delay of therapy by 1 week or topotecan dose reduction to 1.25 mg/m(2) is the first-choice option to reduce topotecan toxicity without affecting the efficacy. Moreover, a chemotherapy regimen using weekly topotecan, which is currently being tested, should be considered.     

A phase I trial of oxaliplatin and topotecan in recurrent ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Oxaliplatin and topotecan have demonstrated activity as single agents against recurrent platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer, as well as synergy in vitro. This was a dose-finding study of combination therapy with weekly topotecan and alternating-week oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had a diagnosis of recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, a performance status of 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. On days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, patients received a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) via intravenous infusion. On days 1, 8, and 15, patients received an escalating dose of intravenous topotecan (2.0-4.0 mg/m2). Five dose levels were planned with a minimum cohort of 3 patients at each level. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled and received a total of 50 cycles of chemotherapy. The maximum tolerated dose was 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin and 3.0 mg/m2 of topotecan, and grade 3 neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Four of nine (44%) evaluable patients had stable disease or a partial response to the drug combination as assessed by cancer antigen-125 levels. CONCLUSIONS: A 28-day schedule of oxaliplatin and topotecan is safe and well tolerated. Because of the in vitro synergy observed between topoisomerase I inhibitors and platinum derivatives and the tolerability reported in the current study, this regimen warrants further investigation.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Based on the activity and tolerability of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, we conducted a phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with paclitaxel and carboplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in chemotherapy naive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Three schedules were studied: paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every 28 days; paclitaxel and carboplatin every 21 days with liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days; and weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin (AUC=5) every 21 days and liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days. The paclitaxel dose was 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h on an every 3-4 week schedule and 60 mg/m(2) when administered weekly. Based on the frequency of neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and > or =grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, the starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin of 20 mg/m(2) was escalated to determine the MTD. RESULTS: A total of 210 (21-day) cycles were administered to 37 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred when liposomal doxorubicin was administered at 40 mg/m(2). Because of treatment-related delays resulting in decreased paclitaxel/carboplatin dose intensity, administration was modified to be given every 21 days, with liposomal doxorubicin given every 42 days. Since neutropenia was the DLT of this schedule, the schema was further modified to administer paclitaxel weekly; however, weekly administration was inconsistent because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin (AUC=5) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) are tolerable without supportive therapy. The usual dose intensity of paclitaxel/carboplatin was maintained by administering liposomal doxorubicin every other cycle.     

A phase I trial of gemcitabine and topotecan in previously treated ovarian or peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent cancer after treatment with a platinum and paclitaxel-containing regimen were eligible for this study. Initial treatment was gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) on days 2-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dose escalations were planned first for topotecan (Cohort I, Dose Levels 1-5) then for gemcitabine (Cohort II, Dose Levels 6-9) until the MTD was reached. RESULTS: Ten patients received a total of 29 cycles. When none of the first four patients could complete therapy as prescribed due to toxicity, doses for each drug were reduced by 1 day. The next six patients were treated at the modified schedule of gemcitabine days 1 and 8 and topotecan days 2-4 (Dose Level -1). Despite this modification, dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis occurred at Dose Level -1, and the study was closed early. CONCLUSIONS: At both the initial dose schedule and an attenuated schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan produced dose-limiting toxicities in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer.     

Three-consecutive-day topotecan is an active regimen for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the response rate and toxicity of topotecan administered Days 1-3 every 21 days for recurrent epithelial cancers of the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube. A 3-day regimen may be more convenient and less expensive than a 5-day schedule. METHODS: Patients with recurrent epithelial cancer of the ovary, peritoneum, or fallopian tube who had adequate hepatic, renal, and hematologic function were eligible for participation. Topotecan (2 mg/m(2)) was administered for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. Response was measured clinically and serologically. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (GCSF) were not utilized prophylactically, but could be added under specific conditions. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with recurrent ovarian cancer whose median age was 63 (range 32-84) received 165 cycles of topotecan (median = 6; range 2-8) and are evaluable for toxicity. The median number of prior regimens was 1. Topotecan was administered on schedule in 96.6% of cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 29.1 and 23.6% of courses, respectively; but only 3.4% of cycles required GCSF support (6 cycles for 2 patients). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was rare (1% of cycles). Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. The response rate for 28 evaluable patients was 32.1% (10.7% complete response (CR) and 21.4% partial response (PR)); stable disease was seen in 17.9% of patients. The median progression-free interval (PFI) for all patients was 15.5 weeks (range 5-40). Eighteen platinum-sensitive patients demonstrated a 43.4% response rate (12.5% CR and 31.3% PR); stable disease was documented in 18.8%. The median PFI for platinum-sensitive patients was 18.5 weeks (range 5-40). CONCLUSION: Topotecan is an effective regimen with acceptable toxicity for recurrent ovarian cancer when administered for 3 consecutive days (2 mg/m(2)) every 21 days. It can be delivered on schedule without GCSF support in the vast majority of patients.     

Phase I study of topotecan and radiation therapy in advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan given with external-beam radiotherapy in advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: A prospective Phase I trial of topotecan given with standard external-beam radiotherapy was performed in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Patients were treated with a starting dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) and escalated by 0.25 mg/m(2). Nine patients were treated. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were measured. RESULTS: Patients were treated with 1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days on Days 1-5 and 22-26 concomitantly with radiotherapy without significant toxicity. Grade III anemia in one case and Grade II leukopenia in two cases were seen in the three patients at this dose level. Dose-limiting toxicity was not reached. CONCLUSION: Topotecan can be safely administered at a dose of 1.0 mg/m(2) during external-beam radiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer.     

High-dose topotecan, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide (TMC) with stem cell support: a new regimen for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the optimal dose of topotecan when used in combination with high-dose melphalan and cyclophosphamide (TMC), and to assess the toxicity and efficacy of the regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer were treated. Disease status at study entry included: platinum-sensitive recurrent disease (15 patients), platinum-resistant or refractory recurrent disease (15 patients), positive second-look surgery (16 patients), failure to achieve a primary clinical complete response (CR) (7 patients). Following stem cell mobilization and collection, patients were given cyclophosphamide 1 g/m(2)/day on Days -6, -5, -4; melphalan 70 mg/m(2)/day on Days -3, -2; and topotecan at escalating doses from 1.25 to 4.0 mg/m(2)/day on Days -6 to -2. Peripheral blood stem cells were infused on Day 0. RESULTS: The optimal topotecan dose selected for future trials was 4.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days. The regimen had acceptable toxicity with no regimen-related death. Toxicity (Bearman toxicity criteria) was limited mostly to grade 1-2 mucositis and diarrhea. The overall response rate of patients with measurable or evaluable disease was 93%. Median survival has not yet been reached, but with a median follow up of 18 months (range: 11-37) 77% of patients are alive. CONCLUSION: With a topotecan dose of 4.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days, the TMC regimen has acceptable toxicity and produces high response rates. In the setting of ovarian cancer, high-dose chemotherapy should be administered only as part of well-designed clinical trials. TMC should be considered a potential regimen for future randomized trials in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.