Cephalometric evaluation of rapid and slow maxillary expansion in patients with BCLP: Secondary data analysis from a randomized clinical trial

Objective:To compare the dentoskeletal effects of rapid (RME) and slow (SME) maxillary expansion in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (BCLP).Materials and Methods:This was a secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT). Forty-six patients (34 male, 12 female) with BCLP and posterior crossbite (mean age of 9.2 years) were randomly assigned to two study groups. Group RME comprised subjects treated with Haas/Hyrax expander. Group SME included patients treated with quad-helix appliance. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before expansion (T1) and after appliance removal at the end of a 6-month retention period (T2) for a previous RCT that compared the transverse skeletal effects of RME and SME. CBCT-derived cephalometric images were generated and cephalometric analysis was performed using Dolphin Imaging Software (Chatsworth, Calif). Intergroup comparisons were performed using t tests (P < .05).Results:Baseline forms were similar between groups. No significant differences between RME and SME groups were found.Conclusions:Rapid and slow maxillary expansion produced similar sagittal and vertical changes in patients with BCLP. Both Haas/Hyrax and quad-helix appliances can be used in patients with vertical facial pattern. Clinical relevance: RME and SME can be equally indicated in the treatment of maxillary arch constriction in patients with BCLP.     

A comparison of sagittal and vertical effects between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures.

The purpose of this study was to determine the vertical and sagittal effects of bonded rapid maxillary expansion (RME), and bonded slow maxillary expansion (SME) procedures, and to compare these effects between the groups. Subjects with maxillary bilateral crossbites were selected and two treatment groups with 12 patients in each were constructed. The Hyrax screw in the RME treatment group and the spring of the Minne-Expander in the SME treatment group were embedded in the posterior bite planes, which had a thickness of 1 mm. At the end of active treatment these appliances were worn for retention for an additional 3 months. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken at the beginning and end of treatment, and at the end of the retention period. The maxilla showed anterior displacement in both groups. The mandible significantly rotated downward and backward only in the RME group. The inter-incisal angle and overjet increased in both groups. No significant differences were observed for the net changes between the two groups.     

Effects of a modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance and vertical chin cap on dentofacial structures

The aim of this study was to determine the sagittal, transverse, and vertical effects of a modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion (RME) device used with a vertical chin cap on dentofacial structures. The study group consisted of 34 patients (25 girls and 9 boys) who were selected without regard to their skeletal class and gender. All subjects had permanent dentition (mean age, 12.7 years) and needed maxillary expansion. Study Group I (RME only) was composed of 17 subjects, and study Group II (RME with vertical chin cap) was composed of 17 subjects. Twenty-nine measurements were made on the patients' cephalometric films and plaster models. The means and standard deviations for linear and angular cephalometric measurements were analyzed statistically, and intra-group and inter group changes were evaluated by paired and Student's t-tests using SPSS 10.1 for windows. We found that the maxilla moved anteriorly relative to the anterior cranial base. The nasal width, maxillary width, intercanine width, mandibular intermolar width, maxillary intermolar width, and overjet all increased, while the upper molars tipped buccally in both groups. In Group I, the mandible rotated posteriorly, the lower anterior facial height increased, and the overbite decreased. These effects were reduced in Group II. We conclude that the vertical chin cap is an effective appliance for preventing the adverse vertical effects of RME in patients with a crossbite and a vertical growth pattern.     

A comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion and fan-type rapid maxillary expansion on dentofacial structures

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the sagittal, transverse, and vertical effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and fan-type RME on dentofacial structures. The study group consisted of 34 patients, 14 boys and 20 girls (average age 12.5 years), selected without considering their skeletal class and sex. The fan-type RME group comprised 17 subjects, who had an anterior constricted maxilla with a normal intermolar width. The RME group comprised 17 other subjects, who had a maxillary transverse discrepancy with a posterior crossbite. The records obtained for each patient included a lateral and a frontal cephalometric film, upper plaster models, and occlusal radiograph obtained before treatment (T1), after expansion (T2), and immediately after a three-month retention period (T3). The data obtained from the evaluation of the records before and after treatment, after treatment and after retention, and before treatment and after retention were compared using paired t-test. Further comparisons between the groups were made using Student's t-test. There was significantly greater expansion in the intercanine than in the intermolar width in the fan-type RME group as compared with the RME group. Downward and forward movement of the maxilla was observed in both groups. The upper incisors were tipped palatally in the RME group, but they were tipped labially in the fan-type RME group. There was significantly greater expansion in the nasal cavity and maxillary width in the RME group as opposed to the fan-type RME group.     

Dentofacial changes from fan-type rapid maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion in early mixed dentition: A prospective clinical trial

Objective:To test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the effects of fan-type rapid (FRME) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) used with an acrylic bonded expansion appliance on dentofacial structures in early occlusal stages.Materials and Methods:This was a prospective clinical trial. The FRME group had an anterior constricted maxillary width with a normal intermolar width, and the RME group had bilateral constricted maxillary width. The FRME group consisted of 20 patients (mean age, 8.96 ± 1.19 years), and the RME group consisted of 22 patients (mean age, 8.69 ± 0.66 years). Lateral and frontal cephalometric radiographs and dental casts were taken before and after expansion and 3 months after completing treatment for each patient. The data were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance. The paired-samples t-test was used to evaluate treatment and retention effects, and the independent samples t-test was used to consider the differences between the two groups.Results:The maxilla moved downward and forward in both groups. The nasal cavity and maxillary width were expanded more in the RME group, and there were only a few relapses in this group during the retention period. There was significant labial tipping of the upper incisors in the FRME expansion group. The expansion of intercanine width was similar in both groups, but the expansion of intermolar width was significantly greater in the RME group.Conclusion:The null hypothesis was rejected. There was a difference between the effects of FRME and RME used with an acrylic bonded expansion appliance on dentofacial structures in the early occlusal stages.     

Slow maxillary expansion: a comparison between banded and bonded appliances

Various investigations have mentioned the use of a bonded maxillary expansion appliance. It was postulated that a full coverage of the occlusal surfaces by acrylic would remove interferences during the lateral displacement of the two maxillary bones and would lessen the resistance to maxillary expansion. The first objective of this study was to compare two appliances, a bonded and a banded Minne expander using a continuous force of two pounds, which would produce a slow maxillary expansion. The second objective was to evaluate the ratio between the skeletal and dental response to slow maxillary expansion, and to compare these results to those obtained with a rapid maxillary expansion procedure. Each experimental group consisted of 5 patients, aged between 8 and 12 years wearing the two different appliances. Prior to treatment they were implanted according to the Bj?rk technique. The slow expansion period lasted 7 to 15 weeks followed by a retention period of 12 weeks. Post-retention observations followed 12 weeks after the end of retention. No significant difference was found between banded and bonded appliances in regard to dental and skeletal expansion and relapse. The amount of skeletal versus dental movements equalled results obtained with rapid maxillary expansion. The relapse tendency appeared lower than with rapid maxillary expansion.     

CBCT of skeletal changes following rapid maxillary expansion to increase arch-length with a development-dependent bonded or banded appliance

Objective:To assess the three-dimensional (3D) skeletal response to a standardized 5 mm of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in growing children (6–15 years) with maxillary width deficiency and crowding.Materials and Methods:A bonded appliance was used prior to the eruption of the maxillary first premolars (Mx4s), and a banded appliance was used thereafter. A consecutive sample of 89 patients (29 boys and 60 girls) from a large pediatric dentistry and orthodontics practice was divided into four groups: 1) 6–8 years old (n  =  26), 2) 9–11 years old with unerupted Mx4s (n  =  21), 3) 9–11 years with erupted Mx4s (n  =  23), and 4) 12–15 years (n  =  19). For all patients, the 3D evaluation of dental and skeletal effects was performed with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).Results:For both appliances in all patients, CBCT confirmed a triangular pattern of expansion in both the frontal and sagittal planes. Overall, both appliances produced significant maxillary expansion (>80% of the 5-mm activation), but older children showed a progressively more dental (less skeletal) response. Comparison of the two types of expanders in the crossover sample, children aged 9–11 years, showed that the bonded RME produced the most efficient skeletal expansion in the preadolescent sample. Increased maxillary width at the level of the zygomaticomaxillary suture was the best indicator for development of maxillary arch circumference.Conclusion:Development-dependent appliances (bonded RPE before Mx4s erupt, and a banded device thereafter) provided optimal RME treatment for all children from age 6–15 years.     

Does rapid maxillary expansion affect the eruption of upper third molars?

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the movement of the upper third molars between rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and non-RME patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed on 30 patients divided into two groups. The study group included 20 patients who had maxillary narrowness and bilateral maxillary third molars and who had undergone RME application. The control group of 10 patients had a bilateral crossbite, had bilateral maxillary third molars, and did not receive orthodontic treatment. The records included lateral and frontal cephalometric films and maxillary plaster models. In the study group, records were taken before expansion (T1), after expansion (T2), and at the retention period (T3). T2 records were not taken in the control group because this period was too short to observe any changes. Friedman tests were used to observe within groups, and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to see the differences between groups on films and casts. RESULTS: Frontal films showed that vertical eruption occurred after the retention period in the RME cases. Cephalometric films revealed that the angular eruption occurred immediately after expansion. However, the results were not significant with respect to the control group. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis was rejected. Rapid maxillary expansion affects maxillary third molar movement during and after the RME procedure. RME may indicate upper third molar eruption, but the final position of third molar was not different compared to the normal growth pattern.     

Longitudinal effects of rapid maxillary expansion

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) via banded expanders in the sagittal and vertical facial planes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 25 patients who had undergone RME (with either Haas-type or Hyrax hygienic expanders) followed by standard edgewise orthodontic therapy. This sample was compared with a group of 25 patients who had edgewise treatment only and with a control nontreatment group of 26 subjects, matched by age and gender with the patients of the other two groups. Lateral cephalograms were taken before treatment (T1), at the end of treatment (T2), and at 3 years posttreatment (T3), comprising a 5-year average time of observation. RESULTS: RME treatment, in the long-term, did not influence the sagittal position of the apical jaw bases or the facial vertical dimension. CONCLUSION: Unfavorable cephalometric changes resulting immediately after RME are temporary, and therefore concerns about using RME in patients with vertical growth patterns or an extremely convex facial profile are not substantiated.     

Soft tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion with a bonded expander

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term treatment effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on the soft tissue facial profile of subjects treated with a modified acrylic-hyrax device. The sample comprised 10 males and 10 females in the mixed dentition. Their average age was 9.3 years ± 10 months pre-treatment (T1), with a narrow maxilla and posterior crossbite, treated with a modified fixed maxillary expander with an occlusal splint. Lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained at T1, immediately post-expansion (T2), and after retention (T3) were used to determine possible changes in the soft tissue facial profile. The means and standard deviations for linear and angular cephalometric measurements were analysed statistically using analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The measurements at T2 differed significantly from those at T1 and T3. However, RME did not produce any statistically significant alteration (P > 0.05) in the soft tissue profile for any of the cephalometric landmarks evaluated when compared at T1 and T3. The use of a fixed expander associated with an occlusal splint did not cause significant alterations in the soft tissue facial profile at T3. This modified device is effective for preventing the adverse vertical effects of RME such as an increase anterior face height in patients with a crossbite.     

Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the short- and long-term changes in dental arch dimensions in patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) followed by fixed edge-wise appliances. The records of 112 patients in the treated group (TG) were compared with those of 41 untreated controls. Serial dental casts were available at three different intervals: pretreatment (T1), after expansion and fixed appliance therapy (T2), and at long-term observation (T3). The mean duration of the T1-T2 and T2-T3 periods for the TG group was three years two months +/- five months and six years one month +/- one year two months, respectively. Treatment by RME followed by fixed appliances produced significantly favorable short- and long-term changes in almost all the maxillary and mandibular arch measurements. In comparison with controls, a net gain of six mm was achieved in the maxillary arch perimeter, whereas a net gain of 4.5 mm was found for the mandibular arch perimeter of treated subjects in the long term. The duration of retention with a fixed lower appliance in the posttreatment period did not appear to affect the long-term outcomes of the treatment protocol significantly. The amount of correction in both maxillary and mandibular intermolar widths equaled two-thirds of the initial discrepancy, whereas treatment eliminated the initial deficiency in maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths. The amount of correction for the deficiency in maxillary arch perimeter was about 80%, whereas in the mandible a full correction was achieved.     

Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on conductive hearing loss

OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis that rapid maxillary expansion (RME) with a rigid bonded appliance has no effect on conductive hearing loss (CHL) in growing children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen growing subjects (mean age 13.43 +/- 0.86 years) who had narrow maxillary arches and CHL participated in this study. Three pure-tone audiometric and tympanometric records were taken from each subject. The first records were taken before RME (T1), the second after maxillary expansion (T2) (mean = 0.83 months), and the third after retention (mean = 6 months) and fixed appliance treatment (approximately 2 years) periods (T3). The data were analyzed by means of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least significant difference (LSD) tests. RESULTS: Hearing levels of the patients were improved and air-bone gaps decreased at a statistically significant level (P < .001) during active expansion (T2-T1) and the retention and fixed appliance treatment (T2-T3) periods. Middle ear volume increased in all observation periods. However, a statistically significant increase was observed only in the T2-T3 period. No significant change was observed in the static compliance value. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis is rejected. RME treatment has a positive and statistically significant effect on both improvements in hearing and normal function of the eustachian tube in patients having transverse maxillary deficiency and CHL.     

Skeletal changes in vertical and anterior displacement of the maxilla with bonded rapid palatal expansion appliances

The purpose of this study was to determine whether anterior and inferior displacement of the maxilla seen with rapid palatal expansion when done with a banded rapid palatal expansion appliance is significantly different from an occlusally bonded rapid palatal expansion appliance. It was hypothesized that the bonded appliance would limit unwanted displacement of the maxilla by producing vertical forces on both arches in a manner similar to a functional appliance. The study was conducted using the bonded appliance on 20 adolescents and comparing the results with those of a banded appliance population—namely, 60 cases from Wertz's study. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before treatment and again after the expansion appliances were removed. The results of this study suggest that the downward and anterior displacement of the maxilla often associated with the banded rapid palatal expansion appliance may be negated or minimized with the more versatile bonded appliance.     

Long-term effects of rapid maxillary expansion: a posteroanterior cephalometric evaluation.

The aim of this study was to investigate long-term effects induced by rapid maxillary expansion (RME), followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment, in a sample of 42 patients compared with normal growth changes in a sample of 20 subjects. Treated subjects underwent Haas-type RME with 2 turns a day (0.25 mm per turn) until the expansion screw reached 10.5 mm (about 21 days). The Haas expander was kept on the teeth as a passive retainer for an average of about 2 months. Immediately after the Haas expander was removed, fixed standard edgewise appliances were placed. Posteroanterior cephalograms were analyzed for each subject in both groups at T1 (pretreatment) and at T2 (long-term observation). The mean age at T1 was 11 years 10 months for both the treated and the control groups. The mean ages at T2 also were comparable (20 years 6 months for the treated group, and 17 years 8 months for the control group). The study included transverse measurements on dentoalveolar structures, maxillary and mandibular bony bases, and other craniofacial regions (nasal, zygomatic, orbital, and cranial). RME followed by edgewise appliance therapy appears to be an effective procedure to increase transverse facial dimensions in the long term, at both the skeletal and the dentoalveolar levels. Significant pretreatment deficiencies in maxillary width, maxillary incisor apex width, and maxillary first molar width remained corrected at a mean age of about 20 years. The initial deficiency in lateroorbital width was also eliminated.     

The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures

The aim of this study was to determine the sagittal, transverse, and vertical effects of a Nitanium maxillary expansion appliance on dentofacial structures in patients with bilateral posterior cross bites in the permanent dentition. For this purpose, and without distinguishing the skeletal classification, a total of 16 patients (4 boys and 12 girls) with a mean age of 13.8 years and a bilateral posterior crossbite in the permanent dentition were chosen. Lateral and frontal cephalometric radiographs, maxillary and mandibular plaster models and periapical radiographs were obtained from each patient at pretreatment (T1), post-treatment (T2), and at the end of the retention period (T3) time points. The measurements that were obtained from the lateral and frontal cephalometric radiographs and maxillary and mandibular plaster models were evaluated by a Wilcoxon paired 2-sample test. This test compares 3 pairs of time points, the pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2), the pretreatment (T1) and post retention (T3), and the post-treatment (T2) and post retention (T3). Periapical radiographs were used to demonstrate changes in the midpalatal suture. Skeletal expansion occurred simultaneously with dentoalveolar expansion in the transverse plane with the Nitanium maxillary expansion appliance. The upper incisors were extruded and retroclined. Also, the extrusion of the upper first molars caused the mandible to rotate backward and downward. This resulted in an increased vertical dimension of the lower face. It was clinically observed that the posterior cross-bite and mesiopalatal rotation of the upper first molars were improved and that the crowns of these teeth were moved slightly to the distal side.     

快速扩弓结合前方牵引对牙颌作用的三维测量研究

目的探讨应用快速扩弓结合前方牵引矫治替牙期骨性Ⅲ类反在三维方向上的作用。方法选取30例替牙期骨性Ⅲ类反患者,应用快速扩弓结合前方牵引的方法进行治疗。分别对矫治前、后的X线头颅侧位片和石膏模型进行测量分析,并运用SPSS12.0软件进行统计学处理。结果快速扩弓结合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类反作用为:①水平方向上增加上颌牙弓宽度;②矢状方向上上颌突度的增加是上前牙唇倾,上颌骨向前生长的结果;下颌突度的减小是下颌后下旋转和髁突在关节窝内移位共同作用的结果;③垂直方向的变化与水平和矢状方向的变化密切相关,面下高度增加,下颌平面角增大。结论快速扩弓结合前方牵引治疗可有效矫正替牙期骨性Ⅲ类反,但使牙颌结构在三维方向上都产生极其复杂的不同的变化,应根据错的特点调整相应的治疗措施以使在各个方向上增加有利的变化,避免或减少不利的变化。     

快速扩弓和固定矫治联合应用于高角病例的临床观察

目的 评价上颌快速扩弓和固定矫治器联合应用对牙弓、基骨矢状向和垂直向的影响。方法 对30例恒牙列轻中度拥挤病例以上颌快速扩弓和固定矫治器进行非拔牙治疗,分为两组：高角组(下颌平面角>32°;n=20)和均角组(下颌平面角≥22°且≤32°;n=10),分别在T1(治疗前)、T2(快速扩弓3个月后)和T3(固定矫治结束)进行头影测量分析。结果 高角均角患者经过快速扩弓联合固定矫治器治疗后在骨性垂直高度上的变化无差异。下颌平面角在3个时间点均有显著性变化。Y轴角、全面高、前上面高在T1-T2以及T1-T3间有明显增大。结论 快速扩弓虽然会导致上、下颌骨的向下旋转,但由于其变化量的绝对值小,无临床意义。高角不是快速扩弓治疗的禁忌证。     

Surface resorption following two forms of rapid maxillary expansion

Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a useful orthodontic technique for correction of posterior cross-bite of skeletal origin. The aim of the present study was to compare the frequency and nature of root resorption in premolars subjected to RME by means of either a tissue-borne, fixed split acrylic (Haas) palatal expansion applicance, or an all-wire framework appliance. Another factor examined was the relationship between the pattern of resorption and the duration of the retention period. RME was performed on five patients using the fixed split acrylic appliance and on four patients with the all-wire framework appliance. Following the transverse expansion, two upper and two lower premolars were extracted and processed for histological examination. Root resorption was found mainly on the buccal surfaces of all maxillary premolars. The resorption lacunae covered more of the root surface in premolars treated with an all-wire framework appliance compared to premolars treated with the acrylic expansion plate. The largest resorption areas were found on teeth extracted shortly after the expansion period and the smallest on premolars retained for a relatively longer period. Mandibular premolars showed neither buccal nor lingual resorptions. It was concluded that maximum anchorage of the expansion device, using the tissue-borne acrylic appliance, seems preferable in order to minimize the incidence of buccal surface root resorption. A longer post-treatment observation time is needed in order to draw more specific conclusions regarding the healing process of the damaged root surface.     

上颌前方牵引联合上腭快速扩大对骨性安氏Ⅲ类错患者上气道间隙的影响

目的 :探讨上颌前方牵引联合上腭快速扩大对伴有上颌发育不足的骨性安氏Ⅲ类错牙合患者的颅面结构和上气道间隙的影响 ,以及颅面形态改变与上气道间隙改变之间的关系。方法 :研究对象共 2 6人 ,为骨性安氏Ⅲ类错牙合伴有上颌骨深度发育不足 ,无颌骨高度发育不调。根据矫治前X线头颅定位侧位片上颈椎发育程度判断 ,均为生长发育期患者。行上腭快速扩大后 ,开始上颌前方牵引治疗。结果 :在多因素分析中 ,3个上气道头影测量变量 (SPPS ,MPS ,IPS)均能建立显著有效的回归方程。结论 :颅面形态改变与上气道间隙改变之间能建立有效的回归方程。前方牵引后 ,上颌向前生长及下颌的改变与上气道间隙改变有显著的联系 ,说明上颌前方牵引能影响上气道间隙。