Thrombocytopenia after treatment with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

Abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban are the three drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration designed to block platelet aggregation by binding glycoprotein IIb/IIIa. Results from large therapeutic trials demonstrate that all three agents induce thrombocytopenia in approximately 1% to 5% of cardiac patients. Thrombocytopenia is typically rapid in onset and antibody mediated. In vitro evidence suggests abciximab-induced thrombocytopenia is associated with antibodies directed to murine sequences within the chimeric anti-IIb/IIIa molecule. In addition, abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban also function as mixed agonist-antagonists in vivo, inducing neoepitopes within the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor that may react with pre-existing or induced antibodies. Screening for the development of these antibodies may reduce the incidence of thrombocytopenia associated with these agents, but it may limit their chronic usage.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors including abciximab, eptifibatide and tirofiban have been studied extensively as short-term adjuncts to short-term heparin and indefinite aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions on native vessels. The drugs provide a small advantage in the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and need for revascularization at 30 days (1-2% of treated patients) at the expense of an increase in major and potentially fatal bleeding complications (1% of treated patients over heparin plus aspirin alone). Highest-risk patients appear to benefit the most; clopidogrel should also be considered in these patients. Patients undergoing percutaneous interventions on bypass grafts do not benefit. Whether one GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor is superior to another is incompletely clarified. Abciximab causes severe immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (<20,000/microl) in 0.7% of cases; this is more often than eptifibatide or tirofiban (0.2%). Pseudothrombocytopenia should be differentiated. Effective use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary interventions requires discerning clinical judgment. The value of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors is not established in other forms of vascular disease.     

Alveolar hemorrhage associated with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors have been shown to improve outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions. Their use with multiple anticoagulants has been associated with increased bleeding complications. Among these, alveolar hemorrhage is a rare and potentially fatal complication. Six patients with this complication were identified over a four-year period. Patient characteristics, possible risk factors, pathophysiology, prevention and potential treatment options are discussed.     

Oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition

Platelet aggregation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of thrombosis and the acute coronary syndromes. When given intravenously, potent selective antagonists of fibrinogen binding to the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor, the final common pathway for platelet aggregation, have been effective in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. Their benefit ceases, however, with the end of the infusion. Aspirin reduces the incidence of secondary vascular events by 25% to 30% after an acute coronary syndrome, and clopidogrel provides modest improvement over aspirin. However, both are relatively weak antiplatelet agents that each block only one of many pathways to platelet activation and surface membrane expression of the competent GP IIb/IIIa receptor. With the success of the intravenous GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in the acute setting, recent interest has focused on the potential benefit of oral GP IIb/IIIa antagonists used long-term for secondary prevention. The oral agents tested in phase III studies thus far have not performed up to expectations, however. The following paper reviews these studies and the implications of their results.     

Use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and spontaneous pulmonary hemorrhage

BACKGROUND: The use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention has resulted in an impressive reduction in adverse events. Pulmonary hemorrhage is a rare but potentially lethal complication of antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy. We analyzed the incidence of spontaneous pulmonary hemorrhage following the use of platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. METHODS: The medical records of 1,020 consecutive patients who received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and underwent PCI at our institution between August 1997 and December 1999 were reviewed. RESULTS: Diffuse pulmonary hemorrhage developed in 7 patients (0.68%), two of whom died. Five of 7 patients with pulmonary hemorrhage had activated clotting times > 250 seconds during the procedure. Activated partial thromboplastin time measured at the time of pulmonary hemorrhage was elevated in all patients (mean, 85 seconds; range, 69 95 seconds). All patients had history of congestive heart failure and had elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and/or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure at the time of the index procedure. Six patients also had evidence of baseline radiographic abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Diffuse pulmonary hemorrhage is a potentially disastrous complication of GP Ilb/Illa antagonists. No specific predictors can be identified, but evidence of pulmonary congestion, baseline pulmonary abnormalities and use of higher heparin dosages may predispose patients to this serious complication.     

Noncardiac applications of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

Platelet activation and aggregation have become increasingly recognized as the primary processes involved in the cascade that leads to thrombus formation in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) favorably impact thrombus formation and distal embolization by inhibiting the final common pathway of platelet aggregation. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been used effectively in a wide variety of clinical scenarios including unstable angina, non‐ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, and low and high risk percutaneous coronary interventions with and without intracoronary stenting, however there is limited data regarding the use of these potent antiplatelet agents in the setting of extracardiac vascular disease. This article will review the non‐cardiac applications of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the setting of acute ischemic stroke, carotid and vertebral angioplasty and stenting, acute critical limb ischemia, and percutaneous interventions in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;62:530–538. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Clinical trials of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors were developed to block platelet aggregation and potentially to abolish thrombus formation. Clinical trials have demonstrated that GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are more potent antithrombotic agents than aspirin and heparin alone. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce short- and long-term complications of percutaneous revascularization. These agents also are effective as adjuncts to various treatment strategies for the management of patients with unstable angina (UA) or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (NQMI). Furthermore, recent clinical trials with a small number of patients suggest that GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in combination with low-dose fibrinolytics are safe and effective for the treatment of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The clinical trials of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors summarized here examined different patient populations managed under different strategies. Moreover, these agents have different indications for clinical use and varying safety profiles.     

Oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors--Part I

With the central importance of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and the numerous positive trials with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIa inhibitors given intravenously, it was hoped that one could extend the benefit of IIb/IIIa inhibition to long-term treatment. Although the hypothesis that prolonged oral IIb/IIIa inhibition was appealing, many issues have been identified in the initial Phase II trials that would limit the usefulness of these compounds. Variability of the level of platelet inhibition was one major culprit that distinguished the oral compounds from intravenous ones. The problems that arose were that increased bleeding has been seen when levels of platelet inhibition are high (e.g., > 90%) and that, conversely, efficacy would likely be limited when levels of platelet inhibition were low. If further development of this class of drugs is undertaken, formal dosing studies would have to establish an oral dosing strategy that achieves appropriately high (80-95% inhibition) and steady levels of inhibition.     

Oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors--part II

Although the hypothesis of benefit from prolonged oral IIb/IIIa inhibition was appealing, the large Phase III trials have uniformly shown there was no improvement in outcome. In addition, there was an increased mortality seen in patients treated with the oral IIb/IIIa inhibitor. This latter finding is not adequately explained, but is likely a multifactorial problem of this strategy of platelet inhibition. The trials found that, even with no improvement in efficacy, there was increased bleeding, meaning that for chronic therapy with IIb/IIIa inhibition there does not appear to be a therapeutic window. Accordingly, chronic oral IIb/IIIa inhibition appears to have been well tested but has not worked. Fortunately, there are several other oral antiplatelet agents available that have shown beneficial results, including clopidogrel. In addition, other newer classes of antiplatelet agents are in earlier stages of development. Thus, agents targeted more "upstream" in platelet activation pathways may offer a more tolerable and efficacious approach to long-term antiplatelet therapy.     

The pharmacodynamics of parenteral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists are a unique class of antiplatelet agents introduced for the management of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those presenting with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation (NSTE) myocardial infarction (MI), collectively recognized as acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Eptifibatide, abciximab, and tirofiban HCl are three GPIIb/IIIa antagonists approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration. Of the three agents, eptifibatide is approved for use in both PCI and NSTE ACS patient populations, whereas abciximab is indicated for patients undergoing PCI, and tirofiban is approved for patients with NSTE ACS. Dose selection for the initial trials using the three parenteral antagonists was based on in vitro and ex vivo pharmacodynamic assays conducted under different blood collection and platelet function assay conditions. Recent comparative pharmacodynamics studies, which used newly defined and standardized assay conditions, indicate that the platelet aggregation inhibition achieved with these dosing regimens is variable. Therefore, the differences in clinical efficacy as evidenced in the more recent clinical studies (e.g., Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet Receptor GPIIb/IIIa using Integrilin Therapy [ESPRIT], Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries IV Acute Coronary Syndromes [GUSTO-IV ACS], and Do Tirofiban HCl and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial [TARGET]) may be related to the variable antiplatelet effects of the approved dose regimens.     

Use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention and clinical outcomes

Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are widely used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous studies have suggested that they do not offer benefit in saphenous vein graft PCI. Nonetheless, their use remains widespread during vein graft angioplasty. We retrospectively analyzed 1,537 patients who underwent saphenous vein graft PCI. Patients who received a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (n = 941) were compared with those who did not receive any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (n = 596). The primary end point was myonecrosis after PCI (creatine kinase-MB level >3 times the upper reference limit). The incidence of myonecrosis after PCI was similar between the group that received GP IIb/IIIa and the group that did not (odds ratio for GP IIb/IIIa use 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 2.00, p = 0.07). Propensity-adjusted analysis demonstrated no significant difference in myonecrosis after PCI, in-hospital mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or bleeding (blood transfusion, retroperitoneal bleed, or hematoma) between the 2 groups. In an analysis restricted to patients who were treated with an emboli protection device, GP IIb/IIIa use was not associated with decreased myonecrosis after PCI (this was also the case for patients who were not treated with an emboli protection device). Unadjusted survival (mean follow-up 5.5 +/- 0.1 years) was similar between the group that received GP IIb/IIIa and the group that did not (log-rank test, p = 0.89). There was no difference in survival after adjusting for the propensity to receive a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (adjusted odds ratio for GP IIb/IIIa use 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.23, p = 0.59). In conclusion, adjunctive use of platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in saphenous vein graft PCI does not appear to be associated with less myonecrosis or improved survival.     

A critical appraisal of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition

Despite the success of abciximab in preventing ischemic events after percutaneous coronary interventions, attempts to develop intravenous, small-molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists and diversify the clinical indications for these agents have produced varied results. The 30-day ischemic event reduction in the percutaneous coronary intervention trials has ranged by over three-fold (16% to 56%) and is greater among the acute coronary syndrome trials. The phase III trials exploring the role of oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition have been consistently disappointing, with evolving evidence of increased mortality. Mechanisms contributing to these heterogeneous results may include normal variation in platelet or receptor number, differences in receptor activity, interpatient variation in pharmacological dose-response and the possibility of prothrombotic or nonglycoprotein IIb/IIIa effects. Plausibility of “suboptimal” effect is suggested by several recent studies. Trials investigating the role of intravenous small-molecule IIb/IIIa antagonists highlight the importance of effective dosing. The increase in bleeding and mortality observed in the oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa studies indicate the consequences of suboptimal dosing on safety on one hand, while raising the possibility of important prothrombotic, counterregulatory or other sudden cardiac events. This article will undertake a review of the relevant platelet biology, discuss the mechanisms that may contribute to suboptimal antiplatelet efficacy with these agents and examine insights from the clinical trials supporting these concepts.