Factor analysis as a tool in community diagnosis

For the family physician, community diagnosis can be likenedto individual diagnosis by the application of methods of informationacquisition and analysis. This paper describes the techniqueof factor analysis, applied to data from an urban inner-cityarea, for reducing a multitude of factors to a manageable numberwithout an appreciable loss of information. The variables wereselected from four broad categories which have been shown toinfluence both health states and health care needs: demography,socioeconomics, social disorganization and morbidity/mortality.A correlation matrix based on 40 of the most accessible indicesserved as input for a principal axes factor analysis. Six factors acounted for 74% of the total variance and wereinterpreted as: ‘Poverty and social disorgan ization’,‘Distribution and problems of the elderly’, ‘Ethniccomposition’, ‘Fertility’, ‘Infant mortality’and ‘Foetal mortality’. Representative indices fromeach factor were then mapped to identify and display censustract differences. Finally, the application of the factors toa specific community illustrated important differences withinthe community and identified areas of high risk and need.     

Health, human development and the community ecosystem: three ecological models

Health, as both an expres and a component of human development,has to be seen in an ecological way as ‘the pattern thatconnects’ and the radical and subversive nature of anecological approach needs to be recognized. Three ecologicalmodels are presented, that of health, the links between health,environment and economy (or between ‘health for all’and sustainable development); and the social, environmentaland eco nomic dimensions of a healthy and sustainable com munity. The ‘Mandala of Health’, as a model of the humanecosystem, presents the determinants of health as a set of nestedinfluences, ranging from the biological and personal to theecological and planetary, including the social and political The health-environment-economy model shows the crucial linksbetween health (or social wellbeing) and environmental and economicwellbeing with a particular focus on two key public health principles—equityand sustainabilizy. The final model applies these concepts atthe community level, introducing such issues viability, convivialityand liveabilily. These models could be used to better understand health, to definekey criteria for hea Ithier public policies and to define somekey action areas for healthy city projects. It is in their applicationthat their value—and their ‘subversiveness’—willbe tested.     

Applying logics of change to the evaluation of community development in health promotion

Evaluation of community-oriented health promotion programs requirethat professional evaluators clearly distinguish between exogenouslyand endogenously defined goals and definitions of ‘success’.Acknowledging the different dynamics which underpin community-ledchange and externally initiated health programs and interventionsis essential to this task. It will be argued that the intersectionof, and boundaries around, exogenous and endogenous change canbest be understood and clarified through the application of‘logics of rationality’, adapted from social theory.Community activity is characterised by what we have called ‘lifeworldrationality’ community-based health promotion interventionsare characterised by ‘formal ratonality’. In addition,we suggest that the value dimensions (‘substantive rationality’)underpinning programs and interventions may be overlooked bypolicy makers, program planners and professional evaluatorsunder pressure to demonstrate cost-effectiveness and efficiency.Key requirements for successful and appropriate evaluation ofcommunity-based programs which are sensitive to the needs andsuccess criteria of communities include a shared understandingby the researchers, program sponsors and community actors ofthe nature of the changes sought. The co-production of healthpromotion standards and of indicators to judge the performanceof the program or intervention by all stakeholders should bepreferred over the trend for establishing community-controlledprocess evaluations to coexist alongside expert-controlled impactevaluations. It is argued that current approaches to standardsetting and indicator development to judge the processes andimpacts of interventions are inadequate and several principlesfor improving their content are given. A locally controlledethnographic approach to evaluate endogenous community-led changeis described in the hope that program planners and evaluatorsmay become more sensitive and receptive to local knowledge.We suggest that engagement with what we have termed the ‘communitystory’ should be a fundamental requirement for the planningand evaluation of community health programs.     

Strategies, guidelines, policies and standards: the search for direction in community health promotion

In this paper, the authors respond on behalf ofa panel representingthe American Public Health Association in the USA to criticismsfrom Canada (by Higgins and Green, two health education researchersfrom British Columbia) regarding the relevance and adequacyof a set of criteria developed in the USA for guiding the developmentof health promotion programs in other developed countries, suchas Canada. The US criteria included a specific focus on riskfactors of disease or untoword health conditions, the characteristicsof an intervention's target group(s), the appropriateness ofan interivention for a given target group or socio-culturalsituation, the optimum use of available resources, and the abilityto evaluate intervention effects. The Canadian criticisms were that these criteria do not allowforor give proper appreciation to the process through which communitiescoalesce around specific problems or issues of importance to‘health’, and there is strong exception taken tothe focus by US groups on ‘risk factor reduction’.There is a preference among Canadians for the tenn ‘riskcondition’, which is defined as ‘local conditionshaving an impact on the health of neighborhoods’. Through a series of case illustrations, the Canadian authorsattempt to show the narrowness of the US criteria, thereforearguing for a broader set of criteria which would allow fora programatic focus on community-based health problems whichare not ‘"carefully deflned measureable, modifiable" riskfac tors’. In response, the authors of this paper argue that their Canadiancritics have misinterpreted the purpose and utility of the APHAguidelines, therefore over-interpreting the implications ofthese criteria for the specific Canadian community health promotioninitiatives they hoped to evaluate. The conclusion reached isthat the APHA criteria continue to represent a useful approachto guiding the consideration of pos sible health promotion investmentson the part of communities or organizations.     

Empowerment: the holy grail of health promotion?

Potentially, empowerment has much to offer health promotion.However, some caution needs to be exercised before the notionis wholeheartedly embraced as the major goal of health promotion.The lack of a clear theoretical underpinning, distortion ofthe concept by different users, measurement ambiguities, andstructural barriers make ‘empowerment’ difficultto attain. To further discussion, this paper proposes severalassertions about the definition, components, process and outcomeof ‘empowerment’, including the need for a distinctionbetween psychological and community empowerment. These assertionsand a model of community empowerment are offered in an attemptto clarify an important issue for health promotion.     

Patient Requests in Family Practice: A Focal Point for Clinical Negotiations

A growing body of literature has stressed the importance ofeliciting the patient's views on the management of health andillness. In particular, it is recognized that patients frequentlyenter into clinical encounters with specific requests for services,that is ideas about how they hope to be helped. The presentinvestigation examined the following two questions: (1) whatkinds of requests do adult patients coming to a family practicecentre have prior to seeing the doctor; and (2) will factoranalysis of a 25-item patient request questionnaire provideevidence of the basic or most common dimensions of patient requestsin this population? Two newly-developed instruments were administeredto a sample of 144 adult patients before their visit to thedoctor. Factor analysis yielded five major request factors—‘medicalinformation’, ‘psycho-social assistance’,‘therapeutic listening’, ‘general health advice’,and ‘biomedical treatment’ —partially replicatingthe findings of an earlier pilot study. The clinical implicationsof eliciting patient requests in the light of current behaviouraland social science research into the doctor-patient relationshipare discussed. Future research directions are also outlined.     

Capturing the meaning of 'community' in community intervention evaluation: some contributions from community psychology

Evaluations of community health promotion can underestimatethe gains that an intervention might make in a community ifthe outcomes reported are limited to aggregates of changes inhealth behaviour or attitude made at an individual level Thenotion of ‘community’ revealed by this type of evaluationis relatively unsophisticated compared to the ‘community’rhetoric which often accompanies program definition. Even thoseevaluations which report policy changes or evaluations of howcommunities became involved, often fail to capture the improvementsa community intervention can make on the problem-solving capacitiesof a community and its competence in tackling the issues whichface it. The essence of what some interventions (intentionallyor unintentionally) achieve is, therefore, missed. Empowerment is usually described as a process. But it can beconsidered as an outcome variable in community interventionsif capacity-building is a major activity of an intervention.To capture this in the evaluation design, evaluators shouldbe using active strategies to (i) articulate what empowermentactually means and (ii) challenge what intervention successreally means in interactive dialogues with program workers andthe community. Active and interactive strategies must be usedto clarify program values and intentions because evaluatorswill be misled or confused by words like ‘community involvement’,‘community development’ or ‘community participation’in program documents. These words mean different things to differentgroups. Similarly, ‘empowerment’ must be translatedinto aspects which are recognisable within the life of the programor period of interest. Community psychology is introduced in this paper as a fieldwhich may have much to offer in this analysis. Community psychologyis a field within psychology which should be distinguished fromthe more traditional approaches in community-based health promotionwhich are the legacy of behavioural health psychology.     

Health care as an instrument of Apartheid policy in South Africa

The paper focuses on five central features of health policyin South Africa. These are: (1) the differential expenditureon the health services for Whites, Coloureds, Indians and Africans;(2) the inequality between rural and urban African health services;(3) the structure and financing of rural health services forAfricans; (4) the recent restructuring of the urban health servicesfor Whites, Coloureds and Indians under the New Constitution;and (5) family planning policy. In each case the policy cannotbe adequately explained merely as a symptom of the differentialaccess to political and economic power: health services arealso instruments of the state in achieving Apartheid goals.Firstly, the health services aid in the reproduction of theBlack labour force according to White economic needs. The provisionof health care for Blacks outside the bantustans is geared towardsthe urban population as the supplier of a large and increasinglyskilled, Black workforce, rather than the Black population atlarge. Secondly, the health services support the commitmentto ‘separate development’ in various ways. Theyreproduce an ideology which legitimizes Apartheid. Within thebantustans, they are an important factor in inducing ‘surplus’Africans from ‘White’ areas to return to the bantustans.They help to establish the credibility of the bantustans andtheir leaders, and of the representatives in the new segregatedparliament. They also provide a lever with which the governmentcan pressurize bantustan governments into accepting ‘independence’.Thirdly, the health services are part of a strategy to co-optsome Blacks while dividing the opposition. Thus health policyis shown to be an instrument of the state's twin imperatives:reproducing the conditions of capitalist accumulation and maintainingWhite supremacy.     

Lessons from community participation in health programmes

Although primary health care emphasizes community participationand many health care programmes attempt to develop participation,good analysis of these developments is still rare. This paper,based on a review of about 200 case studies, examines some ofthe lessons for planners which are emerging from experiencesof the last decade. These lessons focus on the problems of definingthe term ‘community participation’, of gaining andsustaining broad-based community participation, of failing torecognize the political implications of the concept and of attemptingto develop a management model of community participation forhealth. Based on these lessons, a planning framework is suggestedthat seeks individual programme answers to three questions:‘Why participation?’, ‘Who participates?’,‘How do they participate?’. The answers to thesequestions will help to define a programme's objectives and tomonitor and evaluate its development.     

Principles and strategies of effective community participation

A framework is offered for understanding the conceptual basisand the strategic implications of community participation, inachieving Health for All goals. Special focus is given to themeaning, settings and levels of participation in official decision-makingstructures and at the community level. Questions such ‘howis participation facilitated?’, ‘who participates?’and ‘what are the benefits and obstacles to participation?’are geared primarily towards the needs of individuals who functionat the city level and expect practical strategic advice andguidance. The structure of the 1989 WHO Healthy Cities Symposiumwhich was devoted to community action was based on the frameworkand conceptual approach of this paper.     

'We won't let them keep us quiet ...' Gendered strategies in the negotiation of power--implications for pupils' health and school health promotion

The aim of this qualitative study was to analyse gendered strategiesamong pupils in the negotiation of power at school, and to discusspossible implications for health. Twenty-seven single-sex focusgroup interviews were conducted with pupils from equal opportunityprojects. The interviews were analysed using grounded theory.The girls used ‘alliance building’ and ‘resistance’,in order to increase their power, while ‘responsibilitytaking’ and ‘withdrawal’ could mean maintainedsubordination. The boys used mastering techniques (various typesof abuse, claiming to be the norm, acting-out behaviour, blamingthe girls, choosing boys only) in self-interest to maintaintheir dominance. The girls' active and democratic actions forincreased power could be of significant importance for theirhealth. The boys' health would benefit if they gave up strivingfor power over others. School health promotion needs to addressthe asymmetric and gendered distribution of power between pupils,as well as to challenge the existing gender regime at an institutionallevel.     

Primary health care: why has water been neglected?

Since primary health care became ‘selective’ theneed for clean water sources has largely been neglected. Thispaper highlights both the economic and philosophical necessityto look again at the approach to primary health care. An observationalstudy from Nigeria is used to exemplify a community where aclean water source was the most urgent need, yet was ignored.Guinea worm infestation therefore caused serious disabilityin the community and resulted in a reduced uptake of the veryforms of ‘selective’ primary health care that havebeen favoured internationally - breastfeeding, immunizations,malaria treatment and oral rehydration therapy. In particular,the effect of such disability on women - who have prime responsibilityfor the health and welfare of their families - was seriouslyunderestimated, to the detriment of child health and survival.A clean, convenient water supply should be an essential componentof primary health     

Towards a framework for outcome assessment of health intervention: Conceptual and methodological considerations

We provide a framework for assessing the outcome of community-basedintervention programmes for the promotion of cardiovascularhealth at local level. Particular attention is therefore givento conceptual components connected with community participationin health programmes and to methodological approaches in theevaluation of cardiovascular disease (CVD)-prevention programmes.In a search of the literature covering more than 20 years (1966–1988)in 2 databases (MEDLINE and SOCA), we found that the conceptsof ‘community participation’ and ‘communityinvolvement’ have mainly been used during the latter halfof the study period. The concepts were often used interchangeablyand with no statement as to their precise meanings. The methodologicalexamination of 2 well-known community-based CVO-preventive programmesrevealed that most of the scientific papers from these programmesdealt with health behavioural and/or medical effects. The suggestedframework presented in this study is designed as a longitudinalprocess analysis focusing on critical key steps along the pathfrom input to output. The suggested research strategy is problem-orientated,inter-disciplinary and based on a multi-method approach.     

'Well-being': health promotion's red herring

‘Well-being’ is frequently said to be the ultimategoal of health promotion. However, health promotion author itiesdo no: offer a clear definition of ‘well-being’.Instead health promoters either assume a causal relationshipbetween their activities and the increase of ‘well-being’or claim privileged knowledge of ‘well-being’ andits means of production, or both. These health promotion strategiesare questioned, and it is suggested that the use of ‘well-being’in health promotion acts to obscure the analysis of health promotionphilosophy and practice. It is concluded that either the term‘well-being’ should be given clear and substantialcontent, or it should be discarded by health promoters. Thelatter option is favoured.     

Health education and the ideology of health promotion: a review of alternative approaches

This paper discusses various approaches to the definition of‘health promotion’ and examines the role of theWorld Health Organization in its popularization. Health promotionis conceptualized as any deliberate intervention which seeksto promote health and prevent disease and disability. It incorporates‘health education’ and gives prominence to the influenceof legal, fiscal, economic and environmental measures on communityhealth. Various ‘models’ of health education areexplored and their contribution to health promotion is discussed.It is argued that ‘selfempowerment’ should be themain focus for health education programmes.     

Public Health Renaissance and the Role of Schools of Public Health

In these turbulent times of political, social and economic changesin Europe public health is again coming into focus. Schoolsof public health, for long the basis for education of publichealth leaders will also in the future play a key role in promotingthe ‘new’ public health agenda. Based on ecologicalawareness and public involvement in health their teaching, researchand policy development should make them be seen as Centres ofRelevance and not only as Centres of Excellence, thus gearingtheir activities to the needs of new generations of practitionerswho can be both activists and advocates for health. If trainingand research are made relevant for practice and community service,then schools will be in the centre of public health insteadof in the periphery of medicine. Elements of a strategy to achievethese objectives are discussed.     

A critical analysis of different leadership approaches to community health work in Kirseberg, Sweden

This paper examines some dilemmas of both professional and communityled approaches in health promotion with reference to an alcoholreduction programme implemented in Kirseberg, Sweden. A ‘traditional’health education programmed designed at changing life-stylehabits was combined with a community action design. The processby which the public health messages were sent to and receivedby the residents was explored in a qualitative study. The study focused on the possibly contradictory relationshipbetween the ‘professional’ concept of public healthand individuals' personal concepts of health. it is argued thatif the ‘top down’ and ‘bottom up’ approachesare combined without detailed consideration being given to thepossible connecting links the risk is that the result will bethe operation of two parallel strategies which do not interact. The process of making health a collective issue within a communityaction programme is illustrated with examples from the Kirsebergproject and discussed with reference to the chief aim of achievingequity in health provision.     

'If I let a goal in, I'll get beat up': contradictions in masculinity, sport and health

This paper presents a critical exploration of the relationshipbetween masculinity, sport and health by reporting findingsfrom a wider qualitative study on lay men’s and healthprofessionals’ beliefs about masculinity and preventativehealth care. Recent years have seen a surge of interest in relationto ‘men’s health’. In particular, the Departmentof Health has highlighted how men’s connection to sport,fitness and competitiveness can be used in health promotioninitiatives to introduce facets of health. In contrast, workin the sociological and feminist literature has raised issuesof concern about the relationship between men, masculinity andsport, particularly the links to aggression, misogyny and homophobia.It would appear then that a straightforward ‘men + sport= health’ relationship cannot be assumed. Focus groupsand interviews with health professionals and men, includinggay and disabled men, were undertaken to facilitate examinationof the socially integrative meanings of sport and masculinity,and their relationship to health. Socializing, ‘macho’culture and the body emerged as three main themes, and the implicationsof these empirical findings for health promotion are discussed.     

Information disclosure, smoking and health protection: A critique of the European directive on the labelling of tobacco products

European Directive 89/622, which came into operation in January1992, made it obligatory to display health warnings on the packetsof cigarettes marketed in the European Union and to displaytar and nicotine yields, in numerical form, on such packets.The directive can be seen as involving a two-pronged healthprotection strategy: the health warnings were designed to encouragesmokers to stop, while the tar and nicotine yields were partof a policy to induce those who could not give up to switchto ‘low tar’ brands. This article critically analysesthe approach to health protection taken in the Directive. Itargues that, as research evidence indicates that smokers frequentlymisperceive yield data as indicating maximum intake levels,two dangers stem from the directive: brands with ‘low’tar numbers may be seen as ‘safe’, thus negatingthe health warning and smokers who ‘switch down’are likely to have an exaggerated view of their likely reductionin tar intake as they are not alerted to the significance ofsmoking patterns for intake levels.     

Research in General Practice: International Problems--International Solutions

Although research in primary care has a higher profile thanever before, its impact on professional practice and on governmentplanning often seems less than it should be. In the first partof the paper, the different research agendas of governments,health departments, professional associations and colleges,and of universities are explored. In the second part of thepaper a research project which attempts to define and measurequality of care given to patients with a ‘marker’health problem (arthritic pain) is developed from the stageof asking questions to interpreting findings. In the third partof the paper, a number of conflicts between research agendas,styles of research, and needs and expectations of different‘purchasers’ and ‘providers’ are exploredusing the themes and the details of the earlier parts of thepaper as illustration, and a model is constructed to help explainwhy research, practice and policy making often live less easilytogether than is good for each. The importance of creating asupportive climate for research, of providing adequate infrastructure,and of making appropriate training available is emphasized.