Management Strategies for Older Patients with Low-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Physician Survey

When managing older patients with lower-risk hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2−) early-stage breast cancer (EBC), the harms and benefits of adjuvant therapies should be taken into consideration. A survey was conducted among Canadian oncologists on the definitions of “low risk” and “older”, practice patterns, and future trial designs. We contacted 254 physicians and 21% completed the survey (50/242). Most respondents (68%, 34/50) agreed with the definition of “low risk” HR+/HER2− EBC being node-negative and either: ≤3 cm and low histological grade, ≤2 cm and intermediate grade, or ≤1 cm and high grade. The most popular chronological and biological age definition for older patients was ≥70 (45%, 22/49; 45% 21/47). In patients ≥ 70 with low risk EBC, most radiation and medical oncologists would recommend post-lumpectomy radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET). Seventy-eight percent (38/49) felt that trials are needed to evaluate RT and ET’s role in patients ≥ 70. The favored design was ET alone, vs. RT plus ET (39%, 15/38). The preferred primary and secondary endpoints were disease-free survival and quality of life, respectively. Although oncologists recommended both RT and ET, there is interest in performing de-escalation trials in patients ≥ 70.     

Gynecologic Symptoms among Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients on Oral Endocrine Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study

Endocrine therapy (ET) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer can contribute to gynecologic symptoms (GS) that impact vaginal health, sexual function, and quality of life (QoL). A cross-sectional study was conducted at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, Canada between July 2017 and June 2018 to examine the occurrence and frequency of GS among HR+ breast cancer patients on ET, patient-provider communication, female sexual dysfunction (FSD), and QoL. A Treatment Experience questionnaire was developed for this study and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire (MENQOL) were also administered. Of 151 patients surveyed, 77 (51.0%) were on tamoxifen and 74 (49.0%) on an aromatase inhibitor. Most patients (84.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 77.3% to 89.5%) experienced at least one GS “all the time” or “often”, or one or more infections, in the past year. Only 44 (31.9%) patients reported that their oncologist had ever previously asked them about experiencing GS. The prevalence of FSD was 61.2% (95% CI 46.2% to 74.8%) among 49 sexually active patients that completed the FSFI. Symptoms captured in the MENQOL’s vasomotor domain were deemed most bothersome. Side effect management and patient-provider communication should be prioritized to optimize GS, vaginal health, and sexual function of ET users.     

OPTIMA: a phase II dose and volume de-escalation trial for human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer

BackgroundPatients with HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were assigned to dose and volume de-escalated radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) based on response to induction chemotherapy in an effort to limit treatment-related toxicity while preserving efficacy.Patients and methodsPatients were classified as low-risk (≤T3, ≤N2B, ≤10 pack-year history) or high-risk (T4 or ≥N2C or >10 PYH). After three cycles of carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel, response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Low-risk patients with ≥50% response received 50 Gray (Gy) RT (RT50) while low-risk patients with 30%–50% response or high-risk patients with ≥50% response received 45 Gy CRT (CRT45). Patients with lesser response received standard-of-care 75 Gy CRT (CRT75). RT/CRT was limited to the first echelon of uninvolved nodes. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival compared with a historic control of 85%. Secondary end points included overall survival and toxicity.ResultsSixty-two patients (28 low risk/34 high risk) were enrolled. Of low-risk patients, 71% received RT50 while 21% received CRT45. Of high-risk patients, 71% received CRT45. With a median follow-up of 29 months, 2-year PFS and OS were 95% and 100% for low-risk patients and 94% and 97% for high-risk patients, respectively. The overall 2-year PFS was 94.5% and within the 11% noninferiority margin for the historic control. Grade 3+ mucositis occurred in 30%, 63%, and 91% of the RT50, CRT45, and CRT75 groups, respectively (P = 0.004). Rates of any PEG-tube use were 0%, 31%, and 82% for RT50, CRT45, and CRT75 groups, respectively (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsInduction chemotherapy with response and risk-stratified dose and volume de-escalated RT/CRT for HPV+ OPSCC is associated with favorable oncologic outcomes and reduced acute and chronic toxicity. Further evaluation of induction-based de-escalation in large multicenter studies is justified.Clinical trial registrationClinical trials.gov identifier: NCT02258659.     

Arthralgia induced by endocrine therapy with or without cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) have been approved for breast cancer (BC) treatment. Several trials suggested that arthralgia was reduced in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i compared with that in those with ET-alone. We aimed to compare arthralgia rates in BC patients treated with/without CDK4/6i. We reviewed randomized controlled phase II/III trials investigating CDK4/6i with ET in hormone receptor-positive and epidermal growth factor 2-negative BC. Publications were retrieved from PubMed from January 2014 to April 2021. We compared arthralgia rates between patients who were administered ET plus CDK4/6i (CDK4/6i group) and those treated with ET-alone (control group). We reviewed 12 trials that reported data on adverse effects for arthralgia. These trials included 17,440 patients (9255 in the CDK4/6i group and 8185 in the control group). The arthralgia rate in the CDK4/6i group was significantly lower than that in the control group (27.6% vs. 34.8%, p < .001), especially in early BC (28.8% vs. 37.3%, p < .001). These suggested that the arthralgia rate in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i was lower than that in patients treated with ET-alone and that CDK4/6i may decrease the arthralgia rate in BC patients treated with ET, especially in early BC.     

Patient and caregiver awareness of pancreatic cancer treatments and clinical trials

Background

The poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer has been well established. For many patients, active treatments can improve patient outcomes, such as overall survival and symptom control. Nevertheless, there is evidence that pancreatic cancer is undertreated, even in patients with resectable disease. In addition, although participation in a clinical trial is recommended by current pancreatic cancer treatment guidelines, recent data suggest that patient participation in ongoing trials is below overall target accrual.

Methods

A survey was prepared and distributed to patients with pancreatic cancer and caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer by the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (funding for the survey was provided by Celgene Corporation). The 70-question survey was completed between July 30, 2013, and September 18, 2013, by respondents in the United States. The goal of this analysis was to evaluate patient and caregiver interactions with physicians about pancreatic cancer treatments and participation in clinical trials.

Results

The survey was completed by 184 patients and 213 caregivers (not necessarily paired). Quality of life, extension of survival, and symptom management were identified as the most important concerns among both patients and caregivers. A large majority of respondents (94.9%) reported that the patient followed the physician’s treatment recommendation. Approximately 30% of respondents indicated that the diagnosing physician offered treatment options at the time of diagnosis. Among the respondents who indicated that the physician did not offer treatment options at diagnosis, 20.4% stated that no doctor had ever spoken to them about treatment options. Most respondents (83.1%) reported that the patient received chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Approximately half of respondents (49.1%) indicated that they had never discussed clinical trials with a physician. Twelve percent of respondents reported that the patient participated in a clinical trial. In those cases, physicians were listed as the primary source of trial information 80.4% of the time. Familiarity with Patient Central (known as “Patient and Liaison Services” at the time of the study), a support service offered by the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, was associated with higher rates of receiving treatment (P<0.05), searching the Internet for information on clinical trials (P<0.05), and participating in clinical trials (not statistically significant).

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that large numbers of patients and caregivers had never had discussions with physicians about pancreatic cancer treatments or clinical trials. The point about trials takes on even greater importance, considering that patients who participate in clinical trials report better outcomes than those receiving the same treatment outside of clinical trials. Increased discussions with patients could potentially increase treatment and trial participation, possibly improving patient- and caregiver-stated priorities of quality of life, extension of survival, and symptom management.     

Elevated ARG1 expression in primary monocytes-derived macrophages as a predictor of radiation-induced acute skin toxicities in early breast cancer patients

Radiation therapy (RT) the front-line treatment after surgery for early breast cancer patients is associated with acute skin toxicities in at least 40% of treated patients. Monocyte-derived macrophages are polarized into functionally distinct (M1 or M2) activated phenotypes at injury sites by specific systemic cytokines known to play a key role in the transition between damage and repair in irradiated tissues. The role of M1 and M2 macrophages in RT-induced acute skin toxicities remains to be defined. We investigated the potential value of M1 and M2 macrophages as predictive factors of RT-induced skin toxicities in early breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT after lumpectomy. Blood samples collected from patients enrolled in a prospective clinical study (n = 49) were analyzed at baseline and after the first delivered 2Gy RT dose. We designed an ex vivo culture system to differentiate patient blood monocytes into macrophages and treated them with M1 or M2-inducing cytokines before quantitative analysis of their “M1/M2” activation markers, iNOS, Arg1, and TGFß1. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate experimental data to clinical assessment of acute skin toxicity using Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade for objective evaluation of skin reactions. Increased ARG1 mRNA significantly correlated with higher grades of erythema, moist desquamation, and CTC grade. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased ARG1 expression in macrophages after a single RT dose was an independent prognostic factor of erythema (p = 0 .032), moist desquamation (p = 0 .027), and CTC grade (p = 0 .056). Interestingly, multivariate analysis of ARG1 mRNA expression in macrophages stimulated with IL-4 also revealed independent prognostic value for predicting acute RT-induced toxicity factors, erythema (p = 0 .069), moist desquamation (p = 0 .037), and CTC grade (p = 0 .046). To conclude, our findings underline for the first time the biological significance of increased ARG1 mRNA levels as an early independent predictive biomarker of RT-induced acute skin toxicities.     

The evolving treatment paradigm of locally advanced rectal cancer: a narrative review

Background and ObjectiveSurgery is still considered the mainstay of treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Nevertheless, “curable” disease may still pose a great risk for both local and distant relapses. Since the early eighties of the past century, we have witnessed mounting evidence supporting the multi-modality approach to tackle this disease effectively. The multi-modality approach is variable between different positive trials. In this review, we discuss the treatment evolution of LARC, highlighting the key differences between the different contemporary strategies utilized. Based on current evidence, we sought to define distinct patient subgroups and to propose a treatment algorithm that best fits patient’s risk.MethodsWe conducted a literature search through PubMed and Google scholar. Eligible papers were phase 2/3 trials [in organ preservation (OP), observational and retrospective studies were also acceptable] published in English. We used keywords such as “locally advanced rectal cancer”, “perioperative therapy in rectal cancer”, “short course radiotherapy”, “chemoradiation in rectal cancer”, “interval to surgery”, “Neoadjuvant therapy”, “Organ preservation” and “Total neoadjuvant treatment [TNT]”.Key Content and FindingsVarious trials consistently demonstrated the benefit of preoperative radiotherapy in LARC, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is controversial based on published studies, TNT was associated with a risk reduction in distant metastasis, and more reassuring evidence is accumulating regarding OP.ConclusionsThe treatment landscape of LARC is rapidly changing. Clinicians should carefully tailor treatment strategy based on patient’s risk.     

Repeated Multimodality Ablative Therapies for Oligorecurrent Pulmonary Metastatic Disease

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and percutaneous thermal ablation (TA) are alternatives to surgery for the management of pulmonary oligometastases. In this collaborative work, we retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone iterative focal ablative treatments of pulmonary oligometastases. We hypothesized that repeated ablative therapies could benefit patients with consecutive oligometastatic relapses. Patients treated with SBRT and/or TA for pulmonary oligometastases in two French academic centers between October 2011 and November 2016 were included. A total of 102 patients with 198 lesions were included; 45 patients (44.1%) received repeated focal treatments at the pulmonary site for an oligorecurrent disease (the “multiple courses” group). Median follow-up was 22.5 months. The 3-year overall survival rates of patients who had a single treatment sequence (the “single course” group) versus the “multiple courses” were 73.9% and 78.8%, respectively, which was not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.860). The 3-year systemic therapy-free survival tended to be longer in the “multiple courses” group (50.4%) than in the “single course” group (44.7%) (p = 0.081). Tolerance of repeated treatments was excellent with only one grade 4 toxicity. Thereby, multimodality repeated ablative therapy is effective in patients with pulmonary oligorecurrent metastases. This strategy may delay the use of more toxic systemic therapy.     

Radiation therapy for T1,2 glottic carcinoma: impact of overall treatment time on local control

Purpose: Local control probabilities of T1,2 glottic laryngeal cancer were evaluated in relation to dose and fractionation of radiation therapy (RT). Materials and methods: Between 1975 and 1993, 96 T1N0M0 glottic cancers and 32 T2N0M0 glottic cancers were treated with definitive RT. Total RT dose was 60–66 Gy/2 Gy for most of the T1 and T2 tumors, although 10 T2 tumors were treated with hyperfractionation (72–74.4 Gy/1.2 Gy bid). Of the 128 patients, 90 T1 glottic tumors and 30 T2 glottic tumors were followed for >2 years after treatment. Multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model and a logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the significance of prognostic variables on local control. Results: The 5-year local control probability for T1 tumors was 85%, whereas that for T2 tumors was 71%. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that only overall treatment time (OTT) was a significant variable for local control. Total RT dose, normalized total doses at a fraction size of 2 Gy, and fraction size were not significant. Local control probability of T1 tumors with an OTT of 42–49 days was significantly higher than that of tumors with an OTT of >49 days (P < 0.02). Only a 1-week interruption of RT, due to holidays, significantly reduced the 5-year local control probability of T1 glottic tumors from 89 to 74% (P < 0.05). Conclusions: These results indicate that OTT is a significant prognostic factor for local control of T1 glottic tumors.     

Safety and impact of dose reductions on efficacy in the randomised MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7 trials in hormone receptor-positive,HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

Background This pooled analysis of MONALEESA trials evaluated the safety of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (RIB + ET) with a focus on dose reductions in first-line patients.Methods In the dose reduction analysis, data were pooled from MONALEESA-2 (all patients), MONALEESA-3 (patients receiving treatment as first-line ET) and MONALEESA-7 (patients receiving combination therapy with an NSAI as initial ET). Efficacy was analysed by ribociclib relative dose intensity (DI). Safety was analysed in all patients in the trials (except those receiving tamoxifen in MONALEESA-7) and those with/without ≥1 ribociclib dose reduction.Results Of 818 women who received first-line RIB + ET, 41.8% required ≥1 dose reduction due to AEs (most commonly, neutropenia). Median RIB relative DI in patients without and with dose reductions was 99.3% and 65.6% in MONALEESA-2, 98.4% and 67.8% in MONALEESA-3 and 98·0% and 66·3% in MONALEESA-7. Median PFS was 24.8, 24.9 and 29.6 months for patients who received ≤71% (30th percentile), 72–96% (60th percentile) and 97–100% (90th percentile) RIB relative DI, respectively. No new safety signals emerged in the pooled safety analysis.Conclusions This analysis provides reassuring data showing that the clinical benefit of RIB is preserved when dose modifications are undertaken to manage AEs.Trial registration MONALEESA-2 ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01958021","term_id":"NCT01958021"}}NCT01958021) first posted October 8, 2013; MONALEESA-3 ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02422615","term_id":"NCT02422615"}}NCT02422615) first posted April 21, 2015; MONALEESA-7 ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02278120","term_id":"NCT02278120"}}NCT02278120) first posted October 29, 2014.Subject terms: Breast cancer, Cancer     

Ablative radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with reduced treatment- and tumor-related liver failure and improved survival

BackgroundMore than 70% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are not candidates for curative therapy or recur after curative-intent therapy. There is growing evidence on the use of ablative radiation therapy (RT) for liver tumors. We aimed to analyze outcomes of HCC patients treated with conventional versus ablative RT.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed medical records of HCC patients treated with liver RT from 2001 to 2019. We defined ablative RT as biologically effective dose (BED) ≥80 Gy. RECIST 1.1 was used to define early responses at 3–6 months after RT, and local control (LC) at last follow-up (FU). Data was analyzed using Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence rates, Cox proportional hazards model and Fine-Gray competing risks.ResultsForty-five patients were identified, of whom 14 (31.1%) received ablative RT using a stereotactic technique. With median FU of survivors of 10.1 months, 1-year cumulative incidence of LC was 91.7% for ablative and 75.2% for BED <80 Gy. At early FU, patients treated with ablative RT had better responses compared to BED <80 Gy, with 7% progressing versus 19%, and 21.4% with complete response versus none (P=0.038). On univariate analysis (UVA), Child-Pugh (CP) score [hazard ratio (HR): 3 for CP-B, HR: 16 for CP-C] and BED (HR: 7.69 for BED <80 Gy) correlated with deterioration of liver function, leading to liver failure. Most liver failure cases were due to disease progression. No RT-related liver failure occurred in the ablative RT group. On UVA, only BED ≥80 Gy was associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.4; P=0.044). Median OS (mOS) and 1-year OS were 7 months and 35% respectively for BED <80 Gy compared to 28 months and 66% for BED ≥80 Gy. No grade 3+ bowel toxicity was reported in either group.ConclusionsGreater than 90% LC was achieved after stereotactic ablative RT, which was associated with minimized tumor- and treatment-related liver failure and improved survival for highly selected inoperable HCC patients.     

Is dose de-escalation possible in sarcoma patients treated with enlarged limb sparing resection?

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of dose de-escalation in a large series of resected limbs soft tissue sarcomas (STS).MethodsData were retrospectively analysed from 414 consecutive patients treated for limb STS by enlarged surgery and radiotherapy at Gustave Roussy from 05/1993 to 05/2012. Radiotherapy (RT) dose level was decided by the multidisciplinary staff and depended upon the quality of surgery and margins size.ResultsRT was delivered prior (13%) or after (87%) surgery. Seven patients (2%) had pre- and a postoperative RT boost. Median delivered RT dose was 50 Gy (36–70 Gy), and 33% received ≥55 Gy. At a median follow-up of 6.8 years, the 5-year actuarial local relapse (LR) rate was 7% (95% CI: 4.4–10%). The median time to the first LR was 2.7 years (range: 0.6–11.2 years). The LR was most often located within the irradiated field (26/32; 81%), where the median total applied dose was 56 Gy (range, 40–60 Gy). The 5-year LR rates were 4%, and 15% in patients receiving <55 Gy, and in those who had ≥55 Gy (p < 0.001), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, dose ≥55 Gy (HR [hazard ratio]: 2.9; p = 0.02), certain histological subtypes (HR: 7.8; p < 0.001), and minimal surgical margins <1 mm (HR: 2.9; p = 0.02) were associated to higher LR rates. In the subgroup of patients with “positive” margins <1 mm (n = 102), these histological subtypes (HR: 4.4; p = 0.03), and inadequate initial surgery justifying re-excision (HR: 3; p = 0.048) predicted for an increased LR, whereas dose of irradiation did not (p = 0.2). Patients who had late complications (n = 64; 15%) received higher doses of irradiation as compared with other patients (median: 55 Gy vs. 50 Gy, respectively; p < 0.001).ConclusionIn this retrospective analysis of patients having enlarged surgery and RT, histological subtype is the strongest predictor of LR, whereas dose de-escalation did not lead to worse outcomes. A dose of 50 Gy may be recommended in case of planned enlarged surgery with R0 margins.     

The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) Program. A Canadian-Led Pragmatic Trials Program: Strategies for Integrating Knowledge Users into Trial Design

We reviewed patient and health care provider (HCP) surveys performed through the REaCT program. The REaCT team has performed 15 patient surveys (2298 respondents) and 13 HCP surveys (1033 respondents) that have addressed a broad range of topics in breast cancer management. Over time, the proportion of surveys distributed by paper/regular mail has fallen, with electronic distribution now the norm. For the patient surveys, the median duration of the surveys was 3 months (IQR 2.5–7 months) and the median response rate was 84% (IQR 80–91.7%). For the HCP surveys, the median survey duration was 3 months (IQR 1.75–4 months), and the median response rate, where available, was 28% (IQR 21.2–49%). The survey data have so far led to: 10 systematic reviews, 6 peer-reviewed grant applications and 19 clinical trials. Knowledge users should be an essential component of clinical research. The REaCT program has integrated surveys as a standard step of their trials process. The COVID-19 pandemic and reduced face-to-face interactions with patients in the clinic as well as the continued importance of social media highlight the need for alternative means of distributing and responding to surveys.     

Surveillance of the current situation regarding influenza vaccination according to medical oncologists in Japan

This study aimed to clarify the attitude of oncologists toward influenza vaccination and the current situation and issues regarding influenza vaccination for patients on chemotherapy in Japan. A web‐based survey of medical oncologists certified by the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology was conducted between November 1 and December 31, 2019. Of the 1369 medical oncologists who were invited to participate, 415 (30.3%) responded to our survey. The questionnaire comprised 4 sections: “oncologist characteristics,” “oncologist attitude toward influenza vaccines and the current status of influenza vaccination for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy,” “incidence of influenza infection and associated treatment complications,” and “treatment policy for influenza infection.” In total, 153 (36.9%) physicians replied that they did not actively encourage influenza vaccination for patients undergoing chemotherapy. The primary reasons given were lack of evidence (48/153, 31.4%) and uncertainty of appropriate timing (46/153, 30.1%). There was diverse variation in the timing of vaccination and in the levels of encouragement based on the cancer location and medication type. Two hundred eighty‐three (68.2%) oncologists reported that their cancer patients had experienced influenza infection while undergoing chemotherapy, and 169 (40.7%) responded that their patients had experienced an administration delay or discontinuation of medication because of influenza infection. Our surveillance revealed some oncologists considered evidence regarding the administration of influenza vaccine to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (particularly the optimal timing and level of recommendation by cancer location and medication) to be lacking. It also exposed the adverse impact of influenza infection in cancer patients.     

The Role of Radiotherapy in the Conservative Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) has become the standard of care for the treatment of early-stage (St. I-II) invasive breast carcinoma. However, controversy exists regarding the value of RT in the conservative treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In this article we review the role of RT in the management of DCIS. Retrospective and prospective trials and meta-analyses published between 1975 and 2007 in the MEDLINE database, and recent issues of relevant journals/handbooks relating to DCIS, BCS and RT were searched for. In retrospective series (10,194 patients) the 10-year rate of local recurrence (LR) with and without RT was reported in the range of 9-28% and 22-54%, respectively. In four large randomised controlled trials (NSABP-B-17, EORTC-10853, UKCCCR, SweDCIS; 4,568 patients) 50 Gy whole-breast RT significantly decreased the 5-year LR rate from 16-22% (annual LR rate: 2.6-5.0%) to 7-10% (annual LR rate: 1.3-1.9%). In a recent meta-analysis of randomised trials the addition of RT to BCS resulted in a 60% risk reduction of both invasive and in situ recurrences. In a multicentre retrospective study, an additional dose of 10 Gy to the tumour bed yielded a further 55% risk reduction compared to RT without boost. To date, no subgroups have been reliably identified that do not benefit from RT after BCS. In the NSABP-B-24 trial, the addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to RT reduced ipsilateral (11.1% vs. 7.7%) and contralateral (4.9% vs. 2.3%) breast events significantly. In contrast, in the UKCCCR study, TAM produced no significant reduction in all breast events. Based on available evidence obtained from retrospective and prospective trials, all patients with DCIS have potential benefit from RT after BCS. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify subgroups of low-risk patients with DCIS for whom RT can be safely omitted. Until long-term results of ongoing studies on outcomes of patients treated with BCS alone (with or without TAM or aromatase inhibitors) are available, RT should be routinely recommended after BCS for all patients except those with contraindication.     

The prevalence and nature of supportive care needs in lung cancer patients

PurposeIn the present work, we set out to comprehensively describe the unmet supportive care and information needs of lung cancer patients.MethodsThis cross-sectional study used the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form 34 (34 items) and an informational needs survey (8 items). Patients with primary lung cancer in any phase of survivorship were included. Demographic data and treatment details were collected from the medical charts of participants. The unmet needs were determined overall and by domain. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with greater unmet needs.ResultsFrom August 2013 to February 2014, 89 patients [44 (49%) men; median age: 71 years (range: 44–89 years)] were recruited. The mean number of unmet needs was 8 (range: 0–34), and 69 patients (78%) reported at least 1 unmet need. The need proportions by domain were 52% health system and information, 66% psychological, 58% physical, 24% patient care, and 20% sexuality. The top 2 unmet needs were “fears of the cancer spreading” [n = 44 of 84 (52%)] and “lack of energy/tiredness” [n = 42 of 88 (48%)]. On multivariable analysis, more advanced disease and higher MD Anderson Symptom Inventory scores were associated with increased unmet needs. Patients reported that the most desired information needs were those for information on managing symptoms such as fatigue (78%), shortness of breath (77%), and cough (63%).ConclusionsUnmet supportive care needs are common in lung cancer patients, with some patients experiencing a very high number of unmet needs. Further work is needed to develop resources to address those needs.     

Combined concomitant boost radiotherapy and chemotherapy in stage III-IV head and neck carcinomas: A comparison of toxicity and treatment results with those observed after radiotherapy alone

Background: Alteration of radiation therapy (RT) fractionation and thecombination of chemotherapy (CT) with RT represent two predominant fields ofcurrent research in the treatment of head and neck carcinomas. To assess thepotential integration of these two fields, a retrospective comparison oftoxicity and treatment outcome was carried out in stage III–IV patientstreated with a concomitant boost RT schedule with or without CT.Patients and methods: Fifty-two patients were treated by RT alone and 35by RT and CT. In the RT group, there were significantly fewer T3–4tumors(56% vs. 88%, P = 0.002) and higher proportion of planned neckdissections (35% vs. 14%, P = 0.047). The planned total dose was69.9 Gy delivered over 5.5 weeks. In 10 cases CT was given before RT and in25 concomitantly with RT, either alone or with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant CT.All patients but two had cisplatin-based (CDDP, 100mg/m²) CT, associated in 28 patients with 5-fluorouracil(5-FU, 1000 mg/m²/24 h × 5). The median follow-upfor the surviving patients was 21 and 31 months for the RT and RT–CTgroupsrespectively.Results: Grade 3–4 acute toxicity (RTOG) was observed in 73%and86% of patients, and grade 3 dysphagia in 31% and 57% (P=0.02) respectively in the RT and RT–CT groups. The rates of grade3–4 late complications were similar in the two groups (5% vs.12%). At three years, actuarial loco-regional control (LRC) was57% and 66% (P = 0.66) and overall survival was 56% and47% (P = 0.99) in the RT and RT–CT groups respectively.Conclusions: While acute toxicity was higher compared with RT alone, thisaccelerated RT schedule was feasible in association with 5-FU/CDDP, evenadministered concomitantly. Despite the significant proportion of moreadvanced disease in the RT–CT group, LRC was similar to that obtainedby RTalone. Combinations of concomitant boost RT and chemotherapy merit furtherinvestigation in prospective trials.     

Are Providers and Patients Following Hormonal Therapy Guidelines for Patients Over the Age of 70? The Influence of CALGB 9343

Background

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9343 clinical trial proved that omission of radiotherapy (RT) in patients 70 and older with T1cN0M0, estrogen receptor-positive tumors who undergo breast conservation therapy (BCT) and receive 5 years of endocrine therapy (ET) had no change in overall survival, distant disease-free survival, or breast preservation. We examined our institution’s practice with this patient subset.

The influence of radiation therapy dose escalation on overall survival in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Purpose

Radiation therapy (RT) dose escalation in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) remains investigational. We examined the association between total RT dose and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable PAC.

Methods and materials

National cancer data base (NCDB) data were obtained for patients who underwent definitive chemotherapy and RT (chemo-RT) for unresectable PAC. Univariate (UV) and multivariate (MV) survival analysis were performed along with Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates for incremental RT dose levels.

Results

A total of 977 analyzable patients met inclusion criteria. Median tumor size was 4.0 cm (0.3-40 cm) and median RT dose was 45 Gy. Median OS was 10 months (95% CI, 9-10 months). On MV analysis RT dose <30 Gy [HR, 2.38 (95% CI, 1.85-3.07); P<0.001] and RT dose ≥30 to <40 Gy [HR, 1.41 (95% CI, 1.04-1.91); P=0.026] were associated with lower OS when compared with dose ≥55 Gy. Patients receiving RT doses from 40 to <45, 45 to <50, 50 to <55, and ≥55 Gy did not differ in OS.

Conclusions

Lack of benefit to OS with conventionally delivered RT above 40 Gy is shown. Optimal RT dose escalation methods in unresectable PAC remain an important subject for investigation in prospective clinical trials.     

Management of Atypical and Malignant Meningiomas: Role of High-dose, 3D-conformal Radiation Therapy

Objective Atypical and malignant meningiomas are at high risk for local failure. The role of radiation therapy (RT) and dose levels required to improve tumor control are poorly defined. This study reviews our experience with RT. Material and methods Thirty-one patients underwent fractionated RT for atypical (AM, 15 patients) or malignant meningioma (MM, 16 patients) of the cranium. Sixteen patients presented with primary and 15 with recurrent disease. Eight patients received RT following total resection, 21 patients after subtotal resection and 2 patient following biopsy only. RT was given using megavoltage photons in 15 patients and combined photons and 160MeV protons in 16 patients. Total target doses ranged from 50 to 68 (AM, mean 62) and from 40 to 72 (MM, mean 58) Gy or CGE (= cobalt-gray-equivalent). Results With mean observation time of 59 months (range: 7–155 months) actuarial local control rates at 5- and 8-years were similar for both histologies (38% and 19% for AM and 52 and 17% for MM). However, significantly improved local control was observed for proton versus photon RT (80% versus 17% at 5 years, p = 0.003) and target doses 60Gy for both, atypical (p = 0.025) and malignant meningioma (p = 0.0006).At time of analysis, 14/15 patients (93%) with AM and 6/16 (38%) with MM were alive. Three patients (19%) with MM developed distant metastasis. Actuarial 5- and 8-year survival rates for MM were significantly improved by use of proton over photon RT and radiation doses 60CGE. Three patients developed symptomatic radiation damage after 59.3, 68.4 and 72Gy/CGE. Conclusion Conformal, high dose RT resulted in significant improvement of local control for atypical and malignant meningiomas. Increased local control resulted also in improved rates of survival for patients with malignant meningioma.