Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of miR-638 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Introduction:MiR-638 is believed to be involved in human cancers. However, the prognostic value of miR-638 in human carcinomas is controversial and inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the association between miR-638 expression and clinical outcomes in the patients with various cancers.Methods:We searched Pubmed, Embase, Wanfang, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to September 1, 2020 to identify relevant studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to correlate expression of miR-638 with prognosis and clinicopathological features.Results:A total of 18 studies involving 1886 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that low miR-638 expression was significantly correlated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.46–2.98, P < .001), but not with disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.31–9.56, P = .540). Subgroup analysis found that low miR-638 expression was associated with worse OS in patients with digestive system cancer (HR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.85–3.30, P < .001), the reported directly from articles group (HR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.34–3.33, P < .001), survival curves group (HR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.07–3.80, P = .029), in studies with sample size ≥100 (HR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.34–3.35, P = .001), and in studies with sample size <100 (HR = 2.02, 95%CI: 1.09–3.75, P = .025). Moreover, cancer patients with low miR-638 expression were prone to tumor size (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.03–2.09, P = .035), earlier lymph node metastasis (present vs absent, OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.63–3.14, P < .001), earlier distant metastasis (present vs absent, OR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.45–4.67, P < .001), TNM stage (III-IV vs I-II, OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.35–2.99, P = .001), and portal vein invasion (present vs absent, OR = 4.39, 95% CI:2.23–8.64, P < .001), but not associated with age, gender, tumor differentiation, and vascular invasion.Conclusions:MiR-638 may serve as a promising indicator in the prediction of prognosis and clinicopathological features in patients with different kinds of cancers.     

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with CTLA-4 inhibitor versus chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background:This meta-analysis was performed to compare efficacy and tolerability between antiprogrammed cell death (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) + anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) treatment and chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer.Methods:Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched for potential articles. The fixed-effect model or random-effect model was adopted for pooled analysis based on the I² and P-value.Results:Six articles with 1338 patients were identified and subjected to meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-CTLA-4 treatment could significantly improve the overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95%confidence interval [CI]: 0.71–0.84, P = .21) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.71–0.83, P = .30) of advanced lung cancer patients. Moreover, there was no obvious difference in the incidence of 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs) serious adverse reactions (HR = 1.35, 95%CI: 0.66–2.74, P < .00001) between the 2 treatment groups, but the incidence rates of AEs leading to discontinuation (HR = 2.56, 95%CI: 1.53–4.30, P < .00001) and AEs leading to death (HR = 2.10, 95%CI: 1.21–3.63, P = .20) were higher. Furthermore, no remarkable differences in objective response rate (HR = 1.31, 95%CI: 0.97–1.77, P = .02) were observed between the 2 groups.Conclusion:Our meta-analysis revealed that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus CTLA-4 inhibitor could markedly improve the endpoint outcomes of patients compared with chemotherapy alone, and did not significantly increase the serious adverse reactions. Thus, it can serve as a new treatment strategy for advanced lung cancer.     

Association between Alpha B-crystallin expression and prognosis in patients with solid tumors: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Alpha B-crystallin (CRYAB), as a small heat shock protein, may play critical roles in the tumorigenesis and progression of several kinds of human cancers. However, the prognostic value of CRYAB in solid malignancies remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between CRYAB expression and clinicopathology and prognosis of solid tumor patients.Methods:PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases were systematically searched to retrieve studies that investigated the prognostic value of CRYAB expression in various solid tumors. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the strength of association between CRYAB expression and survival in patients with solid tumors. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were pooled to assess the correlation between CRYAB expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with solid tumors.Results:A total of 17 studies, including 18 cohorts with 6000 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed that increased CRYAB expression could predict poor overall survival (HR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.50–2.19, P < .001), disease-free survival (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.16–1.86, P = .001), and disease-specific survival (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.19–1.63, P < .001) in patients with cancer. Furthermore, the high expression level of CRYAB was associated with certain phenotypes of tumor aggressiveness, such as lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.48–4.11, P = .001), distant metastasis (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 1.96–5.70, P < .001), advanced clinical stage (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.24–4.08, P = .008), low OS rate (OR = 4.81, 95% CI: 2.82–8.19, P < .001), and high recurrence rate (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11–1.72, P = .004).Conclusions:CRYAB may serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in human solid tumors.     

Prognostic significance of A-kinase interacting protein 1 expression in various cancers: A meta-analysis based on the Chinese population

Background:Cumulative evidence suggests that A-kinase interacting protein 1 (AKIP1) plays an important role in tumor progression. However, the prognostic value of AKIP1 expression in various cancers remains unclear. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of AKIP1 expression in patients with cancer.Methods:The PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were systematically searched to identify studies in which the effect of AKIP1 expression on prognosis (overall survival or disease-free survival) was investigated. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to assess the effect of AKIP1 expression on patient survival. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were pooled to estimate the association between AKIP1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cancer.Results:Nineteen eligible studies, encompassing 3979 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. AKIP1 expression was negatively associated with overall survival (HR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.58–2.18, P < .001) and disease-free survival (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.53–1.87, P < .001) in patients with cancer. Moreover, AKIP1 overexpression was positively correlated with adverse clinicopathological features, such as tumor size (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.67–2.94, P < .001), clinical stage (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.45–2.90, P < .001), depth of tumor invasion (OR = 2.98, 95% CI: 2.21–4.02, P < .001), and degree of lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.75–2.57, P < .001).Conclusions:High AKIP1 expression is an unfavorable prognostic biomarker and may serve as a potential therapeutic target in patients with cancer.     

LKB1 expression and the prognosis of lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background:In the past few decades, many lines of evidence implicate the importance of liver kinase B1 (LKB1) as a tumor suppressor gene in the development and progression of solid tumours. However, the prognostic and clinicopathological value of LKB1 in patients with lung cancer are controversial. This article aimed to investigate the latest evidence on this question.Methods:A systematic literature searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, Scopus until September 20, 2020. The association between overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), clinicopathological features and LKB1 were analysed by meta-analysis.Results:Eleven studies including 1507 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that low LKB1 expression was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.07–2.60, P = .024) in lung cancer. However, no association was found between LKB1 expression and DFS/PFS (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.70–2.39, P = .410). Pooled results showed that low LKB1 expression was associated with histological differentiation (poor vs moderate or well, OR = 4.135, 95% CI:2.524–6.774, P < .001), nodal metastasis (absent vs present, OR = 0.503, 95% CI: 0.303–0.835, P = .008) and smoking (yes vs no, OR = 1.765, 95% CI: 1.120–2.782, P = .014).Conclusion:These results suggest that low expression of LKB1 can be considered as a unfavorable prognostic biomarker for human lung cancer, which should be further researched.     

Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist ubrogepant for the treatment of acute migraine: A meta-analysis

Background:The objective of this study is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist ubrogepant for the treatment of acute migraine.Methods:Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ubrogepant for treatment of acute migraine were identified in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from database establishment to June 2020; we also searched ClinicalTrials.gov manually during the same period. Then, RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform a meta-analysis on each outcome measure.Results:A total of 5 RCTs involving 4903 patients were included; there were 3358 cases in the ubrogepant group and 1545 cases in the placebo group. The meta-analysis showed the following results: at 2 hours postdose, the percentages of participants reporting pain relief and the absence of photophobia, nausea, and phonophobia were significantly higher in the ubrogepant group than in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95%CI: 1.48–1.97, P < .00001; OR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.22–1.45, P < .00001; OR = 1.07, 95%CI: 1.03–1.11, P = .0006; OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.14–1.28, P < .00001). The incidence of common adverse events was similar between the 2 groups (P > .05).Conclusion:Ubrogepant is effective and safe for the treatment of acute migraine.Registration number:PROSPERO CRD42019145286.     

A meta-analysis of the influence of body mass index on the clinicopathologic progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma

Background:Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) incidence has been increasing worldwide. Obesity, that is, having a high body mass index, is associated with the incidence of several cancers including colon, breast, esophageal, and kidney cancer. However, the association between obesity and the clinical features of PTC is still unknown. This study aimed to determine the impact of obesity on the clinical features of PTC.Method:A database search was conducted for articles published up to 2020 on obesity and clinical features of PTC. Data were extracted from articles that met the meta-analysis inclusion criteria.Results:A total of 11 retrospective cohorts and 11,729 patients were included. Obesity was associated with the following variables in PTC patients: older age (difference in means = 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16–3.74, P = .03), male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 3.13, 95%CI 2.24–4.38, P < .00001), tumor size ≥1 cm (OR = 1.34, 95%CI 1.11–1.61, P < .002), multifocality (OR = 1.54, 95%CI 1.27–1.88, P < .0001), extrathyroidal extension (OR = 1.78, 95%CI 1.22–2.59, P = .003) and advanced tumor, node, metastasis stage (OR = 1.68, 95%CI 1.44–1.96, P < .00001). Preoperative serum thyroid-stimulating hormone level (difference in means  = 0.09, 95%CI 0.35–0.52, P = .70), Vascular invasion (OR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.56–1.26, P = .41), lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.07, 95%CI 0.87–1.32, P = .50), distant metastasis (OR = 1.14, 95%CI 0.64–2.04, P = .66), and recurrence (OR = 1.45, 95%CI 0.97–2.15, P = .07) were not associated with obesity.Conclusion:Obesity was associated with several poor clinicopathologic prognostic features: older age, male gender, tumor size ≥1 cm, extrathyroidal extension, multifocality, and advanced tumor/node/metastasis stage. However, thyroid-stimulating hormone level, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and recurrence were not associated with obesity in PTC.     

High expression of HOXB7 is an unfavorable prognostic factor for solid malignancies: A meta-analysis

Background:HOXB7 is abnormally expressed in a variety of tumors, but its prognostic value remains unclear due to sample size limitation and outcome inconsistency in previous studies. This meta-analysis was performed to explore the effect of HOXB7 expression on prognoses and clinicopathological factors in range of the whole solid tumors.Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify included studies. Hazard ratios (HR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) and clinicopathological factors were extracted. Subgroup analyses were performed according to histopathological type, tumor occurrence systems, and HOXB7 detection methods.Results:A total of 3430 solid tumors patients from 20 studies (21 cohorts) were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that high HOXB7 expression was significantly associated with worse survival (overall survival: HR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.74–2.26, P < .001 and disease-free survival: HR = 1.59, 95%CI: 1.21–2.09, P = .001), more advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (odds ratio [OR] = 2.14, 95%CI: 1.68–2.73, P < .001), positive lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.74–2.70, P < .001), more distant metastasis (OR = 1.63, 95%CI: 1.01–2.63, P = .048), poorer differentiation (OR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.14–1.91, P = .003), and higher Ki-67 expression (OR = 2.53, 95%CI: 1.68–3.84, P < .001). Subgroup analysis showed that survival of patients with HOXB7 high expression was worse in either squamous cell carcinomas or non-squamous cell carcinomas, digestive tumors or non-digestive tumors, and protein level or mRNA level.Conclusion:High HOXB7 expression might be a valuable biomarker of poor prognosis for solid tumors. HOXB7 promotes tumor proliferation and metastasis, and is associated with poorer differentiation, more advanced stage, even the chemotherapy resistance, suggesting that HOXB7 is a potential therapeutic target for solid tumors.     

Prognostic value of HHLA2 expression in solid tumors: A meta-analysis based on the Chinese population

Background:Human endogenous retrovirus-H long terminal repeat-associating protein 2 (HHLA2), a newly discovered member of the B7 family, is overexpressed in numerous tumors. However, the prognostic impact of HHLA2 in human cancers remains controversial. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of HHLA2 in Chinese patients with solid tumors.Methods:PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases were systematically searched for eligible studies that evaluated the impact of HHLA2 on overall survival (OS) in patients with cancer. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to evaluate the association between HHLA2 expression and OS in solid tumors. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were pooled to assess the correlation between HHLA2 expression and clinicopathological characteristics in solid tumors.Results:A total of 12 studies, including 15 cohorts and 1747 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. We found that high HHLA2 expression was significantly associated with shorter OS (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.12–2.43). Subgroup analysis by cancer type demonstrated that high HHLA2 expression was associated with poor OS in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HR = 3.42, 95% CI: 2.39–4.91), gastric cancer (HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.31–3.16), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (HR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.24–2.53), lung cancer (HR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.33–3.44) and other cancer types (HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.34–3.24), but not in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.08–3.56). Nevertheless, high HHLA2 expression was associated with better OS in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32–0.64). Furthermore, high HHLA2 expression was associated with old age (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.03–1.63), lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.41–2.81), and vascular invasion (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18–2.42).Conclusions:HHLA2 may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for solid tumors in Chinese population, by predict the prognosis of cancer patients based on their tumor types.     

Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody plus chemotherapy for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background:The use of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy seems to have reached a “treatment plateau”. The application of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is a new strategy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy. We aimed to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR-mAbs plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC.Methods:According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, we conducted a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases. From the included trials, information on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) was extracted.Results:The research showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, anti-EGFR-mAb plus chemotherapy combinations significantly improved OS (HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.83-0.94, P < .0001), PFS (HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.83-0.95, P = 0.0004) and ORR (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.13-1.69, P = .001). Meta subgroup analyses manifested that the OS of patients with squamous NSCLC treated with anti-EGFR-mAb plus chemotherapy combinations was notably better than that of patients with non-squamous NSCLC treated with the same combinations (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.73-0.92, P = .0005). Compared with the chemotherapy group, combination of chemotherapy and anti-EGFR mAb showed increase in incidences of severe AEs (> = grade 3) that mainly include, leukopenia (OR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.28-1.82, P < .00001), febrile neutropenia (OR = 1.35, 95%CI: 1.06-1.71, P = .02), hypomagnesemia (OR = 5.68, 95%CI: 3.54-9.10, P < .00001), acneiform rash (OR = 35.88, 95%CI: 17.37-74.10, P < .00001), fatigue (OR = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.02-1.49, P = .03), diarrhea (OR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.16-2.47, P = .006), and infusion-related reactions (OR = 3.78, 95%CI: 1.93-7.41, P = .0001).Conclusion:Adding an anti-EGFR-mAb to the standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimens used for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC resulted in statistically notable improvements in OS, PFS, and ORR. In particular, anti-EGFR-mAb and chemotherapy combinations achieved greater survival benefits in patients with squamous NSCLC than in those with non-squamous NSCLC. In addition, the safety profile of chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR-mAb combinations was acceptable compared to that of chemotherapy alone.     

The effect of glucocorticoids on mortality in severe COVID-19 patients: Evidence from 13 studies involving 6612 cases

Background:Since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is an urgent need for effective therapies for patients with COVID-19. In this study, we aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of glucocorticoids in severe COVID-19.Methods:A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (up to June 26, 2021). The literature investigated the outcomes of interest were mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation.Results:The search identified 13 studies with 6612 confirmed severe COVID-19 patients. Our meta-analysis found that using glucocorticoids could significantly decrease COVID-19 mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.79, P < .001), relative to non-use of glucocorticoids. Meanwhile, using glucocorticoids also could significantly decrease the risk of progression to invasive mechanical ventilation for severe COVID-19 patients (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.58–0.83, P < .001). Compared with using dexamethasone (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.50–0.92, P = .012), methylprednisolone use had a better therapeutic effect for reducing the mortality of patients (HR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.64, P = .001).Conclusion:The result of this meta-analysis showed that using glucocorticoids could reduce mortality and risk of progression to invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 patients.     

Clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of E-cadherin expression in non-small cell lung cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:E-cadherin, a calcium-dependent cell adhesion molecule, as an important mediator of adhesion and signaling pathway, plays a key role in maintaining tissue integrity. However, the association of E-cadherin expression with clinicopathological features and prognostic value in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to explore the clinicopathological features and prognostic value of E-cadherin expression in non-small cell lung cancer by meta-analysis.Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to collect the studies about expression of E-cadherin and clinicopathological features and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. The last search time was May 2020. Stata 15.0 software was used for statistical analysis.Results:A total of 35 studies were included, of which the results showed that high expression of E-cadherin compared with its low expression, for overall survival, HR = 0.68 (95% CI:0.64–0.73, P < .05); for disease-free survival or progression-free survival, HR = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.44–0.67); low differentiation of lung cancer compared with moderate and high differentiation, OR = 0.40 (95% CI: 0.27–0.58, P < .05); Advanced lung cancer compared with early stage, OR = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.44–0.66, P < .05); lymph node metastasis compared with non-lymph node metastasis, OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.31∼0.77).Conclusion:Low expression of E-cadherin is closely related to poor prognosis of patients with NSCLC, promoting tumor staging and lymph node metastasis, inhibiting tumor differentiation as well.     

The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:It is necessary to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) combined with 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.Methods:We searched the PubMed et al databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the BEV combined with the FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer up to January 20, 2021. The Cochrane Collaborations’ risk of bias tool was used for the quality assessment of included RCTs. Revman5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.Results:Eleven RCTs with a total of 3178 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were included, meta-analysis results showed that the objective response rate (odds ratio [OR] = 3.15, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.25–4.40, P < .001) and cancer control rate (OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1.91–3.90, P < .001) of BEV + FOLFOX were higher than that of FOLFOX group. And the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07–1.55, P = .008) in the BEV + FOLFOX group was higher than that of the FOLFOX group, there were no significant differences in the incidence of leukopenia (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.72–1.50, P = .83), hypertension (OR = 3.92, 95% CI: 0.81–18.88, P = .09) and neurotoxicity (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.8–1.27, P = .98) between the 2 groups.Conclusion:BEV combined with the FOLFOX regimen is more effective than the FOLFOX regimen alone in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, but it may also increase the risk of gastrointestinal adverse reactions.     

The relationship between NLR/PLR/LMR levels and survival prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background:The relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) and the dire prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not known yet.Methods:We screened the articles that meet the criteria from the database. The relationship between NLR/PLR/LMR levels and the survival and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with ICIs was analyzed. Summarize hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) to study progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Results:Thirty-four studies involving 3124 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. In short, high pre-treatment NLR was related to poor OS (HR = 2.13, 95% CI:1.74–2.61, P < .001, I² = 83.3%, P < .001) and PFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI:1.44–2.17, P < .001, I² = 79.5%, P < .001). Simultaneously, high pre-treatment PLR was related to poor OS (HR = 1.49, 95% CI:1.17–1.91, P < .001, I² = 57.6%, P = .003) and PFS (HR = 1.62, 95% CI:1.38–1.89, P < .001, I² = 47.1%, P = .036). In all subgroup analysis, most subgroups showed that low LMR was related to poor OS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34–0.59, P < .001) and PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47–0.77, P < 0.001, I² = 0.0%, P < .001).Conclusion:High pre-treatment NLR and pre-treatment PLR in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients treated with ICIs are associated with low survival rates. Low pre-treatment and post-treatment LMR are also related to unsatisfactory survival outcomes. However, the significance of post-treatment NLR and post-treatment PLR deserve further prospective research to prove.     

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in parturients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) in parturientsMethods:The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (from inception to July 2021) were searched for identification of randomized placebo-controlled trials in which PIEB was applied in parturients. The outcomes were the effect of analgesia, satisfaction score, mode of delivery, duration of labor, neonatal condition, and adverse events. The pooled odds ratios (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models.Results:PIEB was found to be associated with decreased total consumption of ropivacaine (WMD = −15.83, 95% CI: −19.06 to −12.60, P < .00001; I² = 61%; P for heterogeneity = .04), total consumption of sufentanil (WMD = −4.93, 95% CI: −6.87 to 2.98, P < .00001; I² = 68%; P for heterogeneity = .05), numbers of patients who require patient-controlled epidural analgesia bolus (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.14–0.51, P < .0001; I² = 65%; P for heterogeneity = .01), the number of attempts (WMD = −4.12, 95% CI: −7.21 to −1.04, P = .009; I² = 100%; P for heterogeneity < .00001), rate of breakthrough pain (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28–0.80, P = .005; I² = 47%; P for heterogeneity = .09). Eight studies focus on the duration of analgesia. After by meta-analysis, we found that the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 5 hours in PIEB group was significantly lower when compared with control group, (WMD = −0.15, 95% CI: −0.26 to −0.04, P = .006; I² = 0%; P for heterogeneity = .64), (WMD = −0.79, 95% CI: −1.32 to 0.25, P = .004; I² = 97%; P for heterogeneity < .00001), (WMD = −1.00, 95% CI: −1.08 to −0.91, P < .00001; I² = 0%; P for heterogeneity = .67), (WMD = −1.81, 95% CI: −3.23 to −0.39, P = .01; I² = 98%; P for heterogeneity < .00001), respectively. Nineteen studies discussed the mode of delivery between 2 groups. The results suggest that the rate of normal delivery is significantly higher in PIEB group compared with control group (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08–1.75, P = .01). The time of first and second stage of labor are significantly shorter in PIEB group compared with control group, the result is (WMD = −10.52, 95% CI: −14.74 to 4.76, P < .00001; I² = 0%; P for heterogeneity = .86), (WMD = −1.48, 95% CI: −2.26 to −0.69, P = .0002; I² = 35%; P for heterogeneity = .10), respectively. Thirteen studies concerned the satisfaction score of patients. The satisfaction score of patients in the PIEB group was significantly higher when compared with control group (WMD = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, P = .0003; I² = 98%; P for heterogeneity < .00001). The Apgar score at 1, 5 minutes in PIEB group are significantly higher (WMD = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02–0.13 P = .007; I² = 55%; P for heterogeneity = .04), (WMD = −0.08, 95% CI: −0.12 to −0.05, P < .00001; I² = 21%; P for heterogeneity = .27), respectively.Conclusions:PIEB is a good alternative for labor analgesia with better analgesic effect, maternal and infant outcome.     

Association of interleukin-6 gene polymorphisms with the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: An up-to-date meta-analysis

Background:This study was aimed to evaluate the association between interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene polymorphisms and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a meta-analysis.Methods:A literature search was performed for case-control studies published during May, 1993 to May, 2020 focusing on IL-6 gene polymorphisms (–174G > C, –572G > C, and –597G > A) and HCC susceptibility by using PubMed, Cochrane Database, EMBASE, Web of science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. From 128 full-text articles, 11 were included in this meta-analysis. I² index was used to assess heterogeneity and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized for quality assessment.Results:For IL-6 –174G > C polymorphism, in codominant (GG vs CC: odds ratios [OR] = 2.78, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.25–6.19, P = .01, I² = 16%) and recessive (GG+GC vs CC: OR = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.29–5.90, P = .009, I² = 3%) models, IL-6 –174G>C polymorphism was significantly associated with the risk of HCC. In dominant (GG vs CC+GC: OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 0.92–3.54, P = .09, I² = 86%) and allele (G vs C: OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 0.95–2.32, P = .08, I² = 68%) models, IL-6 –174G>C polymorphism had no impact on the risk of HCC. However, in non-Italian Caucasian population, IL-6 –174G>C polymorphism was significantly related to the occurrence of HCC in both dominant (GG vs CC+GC: OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 2.29–4.65, P < .00001, I² = 0%) and allele (G vs C: OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.48–4.15, P = .0006) models. Such correlations also could be observed when healthy individuals were selected as controls. For IL-6 –572G>C and –597G>A polymorphisms, no significant association was observed in all models, regardless of the source of control and population subgroups. No publication bias could be calculated when Begg and Egger tests were employed.Conclusion:This meta-analysis indicated that IL-6 –174G>C polymorphism was significantly related with the risk for HCC, especially in non-Italian Caucasian population. No significant association was observed for the correlation between IL-6 –572G>C and –597G>A polymorphisms and HCC susceptibility.     

Maintenance treatment of combination with bevacizumab vs single agent for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:When the patients of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have achieved remission by induction therapy, it is controversial that combination with bevacizumab is used as maintenance therapy. Pemetrexed is a classic drug for maintenance therapy, is bevacizumab the superiority to pemetrexed is also unclear. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of advanced non-squamous NSCLC in the maintenance treatment.Method:From the establishment as of December 6, 2020, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched and the American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society of Medical Oncology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network databases in the past 10 years. The application of combination with bevacizumab, pemetrexed was studied in clinical trials of maintenance treatment for advanced NSCLC. The extracted data include progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade 3–4 adverse events (AE).Results:Seven clinical trials we screened, 6 were phase III RCTs, and a cohort trial, including 3298 patients. Compared with bevacizumab and pemetrexed, PFS of combination with bevacizumab was significantly improved (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.65–0.77, P < .00001), but OS was not improved (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.85–1.01, P = .10). Compared with bevacizumab and pemetrexed, no significant difference of PFS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.69–1.09, P = .21), and OS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.72–1.05, P = .15) was found. A higher incidence of grade 3–4 AE occurred in combination with bevacizumab (odds ratio = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.35–1.97, P < .00001).Conclusions:PFS was significantly improved in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who use bevacizumab combination with single-agent as maintenance treatment, but it does not translate into the advantages of OS; compared with bevacizumab, no PFS and OS benefits were found. A higher incidence of grade 3–4 AE occurred in combination with bevacizumab than pemetrexed and bevacizumab.     

The high expression of CHD1L and its clinical significance in human solid tumors: A meta-analysis

Background:Chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 1-like (CHD1L) is an oncogene. It was cloned from 1q21 chromosome region of hepatocellular carcinoma in 1991. CHD1L is up-regulated in many kinds of cancers and is involved in the carcinogenesis and development of tumors. More and more studies have shown that over-expression of CHD1L is associated with poor prognosis of tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of CHD1L in human solid tumors.Methods:The key words in the database of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, and TCGA were searched for systematic literature retrieval. We collected relevant articles and data about CHD1L and prognosis of cancer and screened them according to the eligible criteria to evaluate the prognostic value of CHD1L in cancer patients. Then Stata SE12.0 software is used to analyze the data.Results:In our meta-analysis, 2720 patients with a total of 15 articles involving multiple types of tumors showed that high expression levels of CHD1L were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio  = 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: (1.49–3.30)] and (hazard ratio  = 1.16, 95% CI: (1.01–1.32)] in the TCGA database, in addition, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) indicated high expression levels of CHD1L in tumors significantly are associated with TNM stage (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.01–2.55, P < .05), tumor size (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.07–1.78, P < .05), tumor differentiation (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.43–3.16, P < .05), and distant metastasis (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.45–2.39 P < .05). However, we did not observe a significant correlation between the high expression of CHD1L and age, gender.Conclusion:The high expression of CHD1L is associated with poor OS as well as related to tumor differentiation, tumor size, and distant metastasis, which can be served as a prognostic marker and a potential predictor of clinical pathology in human solid tumors.     

Prognostic significance of ANO1 expression in cancers

Background:Anoctamin-1 (ANO1) plays a pivotal role in cancer progression. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the potential prognostic role of ANO1 in cancers.Methods:A total of 1760 patients from 7 eligible studies were included into the analysis. Pooled hazard ratios or odds ratios were extracted and calculated with a random-effects model, and analyses of heterogeneity bias were conducted.Results:Our results showed that over expression of ANO1 was significantly correlated with poor overall survival in all cancers (HR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.19–1.92; P = .0006). Subgroup analysis indicated that there was a significant association between over expression of ANO1 and poor prognosis breast cancer (HR = 3.24; 95% CI: 1.74–6.04), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.00–1.30), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.07–3.50), gastric cancer (HR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.12–2.34) and colorectal cancer (HR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.03–1.85). In addition, over expression of ANO1 was not associated with TNM stage, histological grade, lymph node metastasis, tumor size, age and gender. However, ANO1 was significantly associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, but not associated with progesterone receptor or estrogen receptor in breast cancer.Conclusions:Our results indicate that ANO1 can be a predictive factor for prognosis of cancer.