Metalwork removal in elective foot and ankle practice: Does it make any difference to the patient?

BackgroundIncreasing use of metalwork in foot and ankle surgery has led to an increasing number of subsequent surgeries for metalwork removal. The aim of the current study was to determine whether removing metalwork from foot and ankle makes any difference to the patients in terms of pain, function or shoe wear related outcomes.Methods27 consecutive patients were identified from a single surgeon database that had undergone metalwork removal over a four year period and sent out a validated Visual Analogue Scale-Foot and Ankle questionnaire. Additional demographic and radiographic data were collected.Results24 patients returned completed questionnaires. Mean interval between index procedure and metalwork removal was 18 months. Overall for the whole group, only moderate satisfaction was noted after metalwork removal with mean VAS-FA scores of 60.39. The mean VAS-FA scores and the pain, function and other complaints sub-scores were significantly better in patients who had metalwork removal after 1st ray surgery (p = 0.07 for total VAS-FA score and p = 0.006, p = 0.005, and p = 0.032 for pain, function and other complaints sub-scores respectively).ConclusionWe can recommend removal of metalwork in symptomatic patients after 1st ray surgeries but other foot and ankle surgeries require further investigation.     

Does the IOFIX improve compression in ankle fusion?

BackgroundThe new IOFIX is an intra-osseous fixation device comprising an “X-post” through which a lag screw passes to apparently improve force distribution across an arthrodesis.We conducted a novel human cadaveric study. Our null hypothesis was no difference in force exists in an ankle arthrodesis model stabilized with the IOFIX or a conventional single lag screw.MethodIn ten cadaver ankles a pressure transducer was compressed as an IOFIX and standard single lag screws were alternately compared.ResultsThe median average force created by the IOFIX was 3.95 kg and 2.4 kg for the single conventional lag screw (p ⩽ 0.01). The IOFIX improved contact area across the arthrodesis with a median average of 3.41 cm² compared with 2.42 cm² in the lag screw group (p ⩽ 0.03).ConclusionOur results suggest an IOFIX improves force distribution across an ankle arthrodesis compared with a single conventional lag screw.     

Biomechanical comparison of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodeses using triple-threaded headless screws versus partially threaded lag screws

BackgroundTriple-threaded, cannulated headless screws of varying thread diameters and pitch are designed to maintain thread length across the arthrodesis plane, provide joint compression, and reduce countersinking. This study tested the biomechanical fixation strength of conventional partially threaded lag screws compared to triple-threaded headless screws in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis.MethodsFirst metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using a crossed screw technique was performed on 11 paired, preserved cadaver first rays with two 4.0-mm triple-threaded, cannulated headless screws or two 4.0-mm partially threaded, cannulated lag screws. The constructs were tested to failure through dorsally directed cantilever bending.ResultsThe triple-threaded, cannulated headless screws displayed significantly greater bending stiffness (p = 0.017) and failure load (p = 0.040) during load-to-failure testing compared to the partially threaded, cannulated lag screws.ConclusionsTriple-threaded, cannulated headless screws may be a viable alternative to partially threaded lag screws in first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis.     

Primary stability and stiffness in ankle arthrodes—Crossed screws versus anterior plating

BackgroundAnkle arthrodesis is commonly used for the treatment of osteoarthritis or failed arthroplasty. Screw fixation is the predominant technique to perform ankle arthrodesis. Due to a considerable frequency of failures research suggests the use of an anatomically shaped anterior double plate system as a reliable method for isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis. The purpose of the present biomechanical study was to compare two groups of ankle fusion constructs – three screw fixation and an anterior double plate system – in terms of primary stability and stiffness.MethodsSix matched-pairs human cadaveric lower legs (Thiel fixated) were used in this study. One specimen from each pair was randomly assigned to be stabilized with the anterior double plate system and the other with the three-screw technique. The different arthrodesis methods were tested by dorsiflexing the foot until failure of the system, defined as rotation of the talus relative to the tibia in the sagittal plane. Experiments were performed on a universal materials testing machine. The force required to make arthrodesis fail was documented. For calculation of the stiffness, a linear regression was fitted to the force–displacement curve in the linear portion of the curve and its slope taken as the stiffness.ResultsFor the anatomically shaped double-plate system a mean load of 967 N was needed (range from 570 N to 1400 N) to make arthrodesis fail. The three-screw fixation method resisted a mean load of 190 N (range from 100 N to 280 N) (p = 0.005). In terms of stiffness a mean of 56 N/mm (range from 35 N/mm to 79 N/mm) was achieved for the anatomically shaped double-plate system whereas a mean of 10 N/mm (range from 6 N/mm to 18 N/mm) was achieved for the three-screw fixation method (p = 0.004).ConclusionsOur biomechanical data demonstrates that the anterior double-plate system is significantly superior to the three-screw fixation technique for ankle arthrodesis in terms of primary stability and stiffness.     

Changes in the syndesmotic reduction after syndesmotic screw fixation for ankle malleolar fractures: One-year longitudinal evaluations using computer tomography

IntroductionTo evaluate time-dependent changes in the syndesmotic reduction after syndesmotic screw fixation and one year after screw removal for ankle malleolar fractures, and to assess whether the incidence of syndesmotic malreduction changes depending on the measurement method.MethodsWe assessed twenty patients who underwent syndesmotic screw fixation for ankle fractures. The syndesmotic screws were removed after six weeks of the fracture surgery. Syndesmotic reduction was assessed within two weeks of the fracture surgery and one year after the screw removal using the axial computer tomographic images. Side-to-side differences in the anterior and posterior tibiofibular distances, anteroposterior fibular translation, and fibular rotation were measured.ResultsThe mean anterior tibiofibular distance was 0.7 mm after syndesmotic fixation. It increased to 1.9 mm at one year after screw removal (p = 0.002). After syndesmotic fixation, four ankles had malreduction of the anterior tibiofibular distance, including three ankles with widening and one with overtightening. At one year, eight ankles had malreduction, all of whom had widening. The other measurement values did not change over time (0.1 mm vs. 0.6 mm for the posterior tibiofibular distance, 0.2 mm vs. 0.3 mm for the anteroposterior fibular translation, and 0.7 ° vs. 0 ° for the fibular rotation). The incidences of malreduction were significantly different depending on the definition of malreduction, ranging from 10% to 50% after syndesmotic fixation (p = 0.01) and from 20% to 60% at one year after screw removal (p = 0.02).ConclusionsThe anterior tibiofibular distance widened after one year of syndesmotic screw removal. The incidence of malreduction varied depending on the measurement method.     

Overtightening of the syndesmosis revisited and the effect of syndesmotic malreduction on ankle dorsiflexion

BackgroundAnkle syndesmotic injuries are a significant source of morbidity and require anatomic reduction to optimize outcomes. Although a previous study concluded that maximal dorsiflexion during syndesmotic fixation was not required, methodologic weaknesses existed and several studies have demonstrated improved ankle dorsiflexion after removal of syndesmotic screws.The purposes of the current investigation are: (1) To assess the effect of compressive syndesmotic screw fixation on ankle dorsiflexion utilizing a controlled load and instrumentation allowing for precise measurement of motion. (2) To assess the effect of anterior & posterior syndesmotic malreduction after compressive syndesmotic screw fixation on ankle dorsiflexion.Material and methodsFifteen lower limb cadaveric leg specimens were utilized for the study. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured utilizing a precise micro-sensor system after application of a consistent load in the (1) intact state, (2) after compression fixation with a syndesmotic screw and (3) after anterior & (4) posterior malreduction of the syndesmosis.ResultsFollowing screw compression of the nondisplaced syndesmosis, dorsiflexion ROM was 99.7 ± 0.87% (mean ± standard error) of baseline ankle ROM. Anterior and posterior malreduction of the syndesmosis resulted in dorsiflexion ROM that was 99.1 ± 1.75% and 98.6 ± 1.56% of baseline ankle ROM, respectively. One-way ANOVA was performed showing no statistical significance between groups (p-value = 0.88).Two-way ANOVA comparing the groups with respect to both the reduction condition (intact, anatomic reduction, anterior displacement, posterior displacement) and the displacement order (anterior first, posterior first) did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect (p-value = 0.99).ConclusionMaximal dorsiflexion of the ankle is not required prior to syndesmotic fixation as no loss of motion was seen with compressive fixation in our cadaver model. Anterior or posterior syndesmotic malreduction following syndesmotic screw fixation had no effect on ankle dorsiflexion. Poor patient outcomes after syndesmotic malreduction may be due to other factors and not loss of dorsiflexion motion.Level of Evidence: IV     

Minimally-invasive hallux arthrodesis with endomedullary and a crossed screw fixation

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery has several advantages: minor pain, smaller incisions and less tissue damage than traditional open surgery. Hallux arthrodesis with an endomedullary screw fixation provides compression and axial stability.The aim of this study was to describe the procedure and evaluate our first results of the minimally invasive first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with an endomedullary screw combined with a crossed screw fixation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 15 feet, with a minimum 1 year follow-up.Patients were evaluated with full-load radiographs and AOFAS score preoperatively and at last follow-up.ResultsConsolidation rate was 93.3%, radiological consolidation time was 18 weeks (14–60). Radiographic alignment was achieved with satisfactory results. The preoperative AOFAS score improved from a mean 49 to 90 (p = 0.001).There was one postoperative superficial site infection, which healed and a patient developed a pseudarthrosis but it was asymptomatic.ConclusionsThe minimally invasive metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with an intramedullary screw is a secure procedure with comparable results to open techniques.Level of Clinical Evidence4. Case series.     

External versus internal fixation for arthrodesis of chronic ankle joint infections — A comparative retrospective study

BackgroundArthrodesis of the ankle is a salvage procedure in case of chronic ankle joint infection. External fixation still is the gold standard.We compared the outcome of external fixator versus intramedullary nailing for arthrodesis of the infected ankle joint.MethodsAll patients with ankle joint infection who received arthrodesis with either external fixator or intramedullary nail between 08/2009 and 09/2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Endpoints were the successful control of infection, osseous fusion, and mobilization with full weightbearing.ResultsSeventy-one patients were included. Nineteen patients (27%) suffered reinfection. Patients with intramedullary nailing showed significantly fewer reinfections (p = 0.019), achieved full weightbearing significantly more often (p = 0.042) and faster and developed significantly fewer complications (p < 0.001). Forty-three patients showed bone fusion without significant differences between the groups.ConclusionsAnkle arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing appears to be a successful alternative to the established procedure of external fixation in cases of chronic ankle joint infection.     

Versatility of Ilizarov technique in difficult cases of ankle arthrodesis and review of literature

BackgroundAnkle arthrodesis is a well-established procedure that has been successfully used for treatment of end stage arthritis of the ankle for well over a century. Internal fixation for ankle arthrodesis is adequate in most of the cases. However, surgeons and patients are occasionally confronted with cases in need for ankle arthrodesis but do not lend itself well to the ideal position and/or internal fixation. These cases may even contraindicate internal fixation. The aim of this study is to assess the results of ankle arthrodesis using different modalities of Ilizarov techniques and demonstrating its high versatility in treating such difficult cases.Patients and methodsThis is a prospective study. Thirty cases of ankle fusion for end stage arthritis or instability were performed in the period between January 2002 and December 2007 at the Health Insurance Reference Hospitals, Alexandria, Egypt. Tibiotalar fusion was done in 22 cases and tibiocalcaneal fusion in 8 cases using different modalities of Ilizarov technique. The mean follow up period was 5.5 years (range 4–8, SD 1.9).ResultsSound and painless fusion was achieved in all the cases except one (97%). The difference between the mean preoperative and postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) was found to be statistically highly significant (t = 10.1, p = 0.001). Many minor complications were encountered during the course of treatment in the form of: pin tract infections, wound dehiscence, cellulitis that was managed effectively with local wound care, oral antibiotics.ConclusionThe versatility of the combinations of assemblies afforded by Ilizarov fixator was found to be endless. This makes the Ilizarov fixator to be an effective and versatile mean of treating difficult cases of ankle arthrodesis.     

Radiological evaluation of ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation compared to internal fixation

IntroductionWe asked whether the type of ankle joint arthrodesis stabilization will affect: (1) rate of union, (2) rate of adjacted-joint arthritis, (3) malalignment of the ankle joint.Material and methodsWe retrospectively radiological studied 62 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov external fixator stabilization (group 1,n = 29) or internal stabilization (group 2,n = 33) from 2006 to 2015. Radiologic outcomes were mesure by: (1) rate of union, (2) rate of adjacent-joint arthritis, (3) malalignment of the ankle joint. The Levene’s test,Mann–Whitney U test and Students t-test were used to the statistical analyses.ResultsAnkle fusion was achieved in 100% of patients treated with external fixation and in 88% with internal stabilization. Desired frontal plane alignment was achieved in 100% of patients with external fixation and 76% with internal stabilization. Desired sagittal plane alignment was achieved in 100% of external fixation and 85% of internal stabilization. A total of 14 (48.3%) patients from group 1 showed a radiographic evidence of pre-existing adjacent-joint OA. The radiographic evidence of pre-existing adjacent-joint OA was also found in 27(81.8%) subjects from group 2. Alterations of adjacent joints were also found on postoperative radiograms of 19 (65.5%) patients subjected to Ilizarov fixation and in all 33 patients from group 2.DiscusionIlizarov fixation of ankle arthrodesis is associated with lower prevalence of adjacent-joint OA and ankle joint misalignment,and with higher fusion rates than after internal fixation.Although achieving a complex ankle fusion is generally challenging,radiological outcomes after fixation with the Ilizarov apparatus are better than after internal stabilization.     

Radiographic predictors of symptomatic screw removal after retrograde femoral nail insertion

IntroductionRemoval of symptomatic implants is a common procedure performed by orthopaedic trauma surgeons. No guidance is available regarding which factors contribute to the likelihood of an implant becoming symptomatic. Our objective was to determine whether radiographic parameters associated with distal interlocks in retrograde femoral nails are associated with the rate of symptomatic screw removal.Patients and methodsWe conducted a retrospective review at a Level I trauma center. Study patients (n = 442) had femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nails from 2007 to 2014 and at least 1 year of follow-up. The main outcome measurement was symptomatic distal screw removal as predicted by radiographic parameters.ResultsSymptomatic screw removal occurred in 12% of the patients. Increased distance between the most distal screw and the articular surface of the femur significantly reduced likelihood of symptomatic screw removal. A cutoff of 40 mm from the articular block was predictive of removal (≥40 mm, 0% removal; <40 mm, 18% removal, p < 0.0001). In patients with distal screws placed within 40 mm of the articular surface of the femur, a ratio of screw length to distance between medial and lateral femoral cortices that was ≥1 was a strong predictor of symptomatic screw removal (area under Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, 0.75; p < 0.0001).ConclusionsMore distal screws and screws that radiographically extend to or beyond the medial cortex are more likely to cause pain and require removal in femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nails. We identified a specific distance from the joint (<40 mm) and a ratio of screw length to bone width (≥1) that significantly increased the likelihood of symptomatic screw removal. Clinicians can use these data to inform patients of the likely risk of implant removal and perhaps to better guide placement and length of screws when the clinical scenario allows some flexibility in location and length of screws.     

Anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament anatomical repair and augmentation versus trans-syndesmosis screw fixation for the syndesmotic instability in external-rotation type ankle fracture with posterior malleolus involvement: A prospective and comparative study

PurposeSyndesmosis injury is common in external-rotation type ankle fractures (ERAF). Trans-syndesmosis screw fixation, the gold-standard treatment, is currently controversial for its complications and biomechanical disadvantages. The purpose of this study was to introduce a new method of anatomically repairing the anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) and augmentation with anchor rope system to treat the syndesmotic instability in ERAF with posterior malleolus involvement and to compare its clinical outcomes with that of trans-syndesmosis screw fixation.Methods53 ERAFs with posterior malleolus involvement received surgery, and the syndesmosis was still unstable after fracture fixation. They were randomised into screw fixation group and AITFL anatomical repair with augmentation group. Reduction quality, syndesmosis diastasis recurrence, pain (VAS score), time back to work, Olerud–Molander ankle score and range of motion (ROM) of ankle were investigated.ResultsOlerud–Molander score in AITFL repair group and screw group was 90.4 and 85.8 at 12-month follow-up (P > 0.05). Plantar flexion was 31.2° and 34.3° in repair and screw groups (P = 0.04). Mal-reduction happened in 5 cases (19.2%) in screw group while 2 cases (7.4%) in repair group. Postoperative syndesmosis re-diastasis occurred in 3 cases in screw group while zero in repair group (P > 0.05). Pain score was similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). Overall complication rate and back to work time were 26.9% and 3.7% (P = 0.04), 7.15 months and 5.26 months (P = 0.02) in screw group and repair group, respectively.ConclusionsFor syndesmotic instability in ERAF with posterior malleolus involvement, the method of AITFL anatomical repair and augmentation with anchor rope system had an equivalent functional outcome and reduction, earlier rehabilitation and less complication compared with screw fixation. It can be selected as an alternative.     

Clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis

BackgroundOver the last twenty years, minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis has evolved into a well-tolerated and safe procedure. It has grown in favor to open ankle arthrodesis due to shorter length of stay and fewer complications recorded. This paper aims to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis at 24-months followup.MethodsFrom 2004 to 2015, we reviewed a prospectively collected database in a tertiary hospital foot and ankle registry. 28 feet that underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis were matched to 56 feet that underwent open ankle arthrodesis for age, sex and body mass index (BMI). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-hindfoot Scores and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were obtained to assess clinical outcomes. These parameters were collected before surgery, at 6 months and 24 months after surgery.ResultsThe arthroscopic group demonstrated significant less pain in the perioperative period (arthroscopic: 1.9 ± 1.2, open: 3.8 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and shorter length of hospitalization stay (arthroscopic: 2.1 ± 0.7 open: 3.5 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). Patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis also reported a higher SF-36 score on physical functioning at 6 months (arthroscopic: 58.4 ± 27.1, open: 47.1 ± 24.0, p < 0.05) and higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot Scale score at 24-months (arthroscopic: 78.9 ± 18.9, open: 68.9 ± 24.7, p < 0.05). There were no postoperative complications in the arthroscopic group but 11 in the open group, including 9 which required followup operations. There was no significant difference in length of operative procedure between both groups.ConclusionsWe conclude that the arthroscopic group displayed better clinical outcomes compared to the open group at the 24 months followup. The advantages of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis include significantly less perioperative pain, higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot scores at 24 months, shorter length of stay, fewer postoperative complications and followup operations.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative series.     

Conversion of painful tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis to total ankle replacement using a 3-component mobile bearing prosthesis

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent conversion of a painful tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis to a total ankle replacement.MethodsSix patients with painful ankle arthrodesis after tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis were included in this study. In all patients, conversion to total ankle replacement was performed using a 3^rd-generation, non-constrained, cementless three-component prosthesis. The outcomes were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.9 years (range 1.0–6.5).ResultsOne patient with painful arthrofibrosis underwent two open arthrolysis procedures at 1.2 and 5.6 years post index surgery, respectively. No revision of tibial or talar prosthesis components was necessary in this study. All patients reported significant pain relief and significant improvement in functional status.ConclusionIn the present study, the conversion of a painful ankle arthrodesis following tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis to a total ankle replacement was a reliable surgical treatment.     

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: Are results reproducible irrespective of pre-operative deformity?

BackgroundArthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is gaining in popularity. It has been shown to have a shorter time to union and less morbidity than traditional open procedures. The arthroscopic technique has been mainly used for ankles with minimal deformity. Our aim was to find out whether we could reproduce the good results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in both minimally and markedly deformed ankles.MethodsWe reviewed 62 patients who underwent an arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis for end stage arthritis. The average follow up was 63 months (range 21–92 months). Patients were evaluated subjectively and objectively using the Mazur grading system. 4 patients died before final review and 3 were lost to follow-up leaving 55 patients for evaluation.The pre-operative tibiotalar angle in the coronal plane was between 26° valgus and 24° varus. We divided our patients into 2 groups based on the tibiotalar angle. Group A (n = 31) had a varus or valgus deformity of less than 15? and Group B (n = 24) had a deformity equal to or more than 15°.ResultsThe overall fusion rate was 91%. Fusion occurred in 29 of 31 (94%) ankles in Group A compared to 21 of 24 (88%) in Group B (p = 0.64).The overall mean time to union was 10.4 weeks. The time to union in Group A was 8.8 weeks compared to 12.7 weeks for Group B (p = 0.001). Using the Mazur ankle grading system, 84% of the cases in Group A had a good to excellent result compared to 79% in Group B (p = 0.73). There were 2 superficial infections, 2 cases of deep vein thrombosis and 3 patients required removal of prominent screws.ConclusionsWe have shown that arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis yields reliable and reproducible results in a District General Hospital setting with high union rates, short time to union and low complication rates. It can be satisfactorily employed for ankles with significant deformity, although this resulted in a longer time to union. The end results remain uniformly good to excellent.     

Incidence and risk factors for removal of an internal fixation following surgery for ankle fracture: A retrospective cohort study of 997 patients

BackgroundImplant removal in ankle fractures treated by open reduction and fixation is often based on diffuse complaints. This study determined the incidence of implant removal and identified risk factors for two principal causes for removal: complaints and surgical site infection (SSI).MethodsRetrospective cohort study involving 997 patients operated on 2009–2011 with follow-up through to 2013. The incidence of implant removal was analysed using competing risk analysis. Risk factors for implant removal were assessed using cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) from a Cox regression analysis.ResultsThe mean age at surgery was 51.6 years, 550 (55%) of the patients were female, and 170 patients (17%) had implant removal: 144 due to complaints and 26 due to infection. Multivariable HRs for implant removal due to complaints were 0.70 for male sex (p = 0.047), 0.79 for each 10-year increase in age (p < 0.001), 0.70 for treatment with a syndesmosis screw (p = 0.038), and 1.09 for each 15-min increase in operation duration (p = 0.007). HRs for hardware removal due to infection were 1.42 for each 10-year increase in age (p = 0.006) and 3.15 for current smoking (p = 0.005).ConclusionIn total 17% of patients had implant removal after open reduction and fixation; the majority because of subjective complaints. The risk factors for implant removal were different for removal due to complaints than for those removed due to infection. This information may be used to inform patients about the risk and risk factors for future implant removal.     

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of acute lisfranc injuries: Open reduction and internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis

BackgroundInjuries to the Lisfranc complex, although relatively rare carry a high morbidity and are often associated with other injuries. Despite a number published studies to determine the best operative management, there is an ongoing debate to whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis (PA) produces the best outcomes for patients. There have been further studies published in the last few years that have not been assessed as part of the wider literature and therefore we wished to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with inclusion of outcomes not assessed in the previous studies.MethodsWe performed a structured search for retrospective and prospective comparative papers and identified 8 relevant articles (2 RCT studies and 6 non-RCT studies) that compared the outcomes of ORIF versus PA; these studies included a total of 547 patients. Each of the studies was assessed for suitability and quality before inclusion. We performed a statistical analysis of the aggregated results as part of the review.ResultsWe found no statistically significant difference between the outcomes of ORIF versus PA in terms of return to work or activity (Odds Ratio 0.80 (CI 95%, 0.32–2.02, P = 0.64)) and satisfaction rates (Odds Ratio 0.15 (CI 95%, 0.01–.00, P = 0.25)). Patients undergoing ORIF have a higher risk of undergoing further surgery to remove the metalwork (Odds Ration 13.13 (CI 95%, 7.65–22.54, P < 0.00001)) or to undergo secondary fusion, but, the overall complication rates appear to be equivalent in both groups (risk difference 0.03 (CI 95%, –0.15–0.21, P = 0.76)).ConclusionsAlthough there were no significant differences in the functional outcomes, the overall power of the studies is low. The rates of metalwork removal and secondary fusion were higher in the ORIF group and this risk should be presented to the patient when counselling them for any procedure. We noted that there is a high level of heterogeneity in the type of injuries and measured outcomes included in each study and, therefore, further trials are needed to determine the best treatment across the spectrum of Lisfranc complex injuries.     

Is intraoperative pedography helpful in clinical use—Preliminary results of 100 cases from a consecutive,prospective, randomized,controlled clinical study

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical use, and to analyze the potential clinical benefit of intraoperative pedography (IP) in a sufficient number of cases in comparison with cases treated without IP.MethodsPatients (age 18 years and older) which sustained an arthrodesis and/or correction of the foot and ankle were included.ResultsOne hundred cases were included (ankle correction arthrodesis, n = 12; subtalar joint correction arthrodesis, n = 14; arthrodesis without correction midfoot, n = 15; correction arthrodesis midfoot, n = 26; correction forefoot, n = 33). Fifty-two patients were randomized for the use of IP. In 24 of the 52 patients (46%), the correction was modified after IP during the same operation.ConclusionsIn 46% of the cases a modification of the surgical correction was made after IP in the same surgical procedure. Whether IP improve the plantar force distribution of the foot and the mid- or long-term clinical outcome has to be critically analyzed when longer follow-up is completed.     

Biomechanical comparison of suture-button,bioabsorbable screw,and metal screw for ankle syndesmotic repair: A meta-analysis

BackgroundTo compare biomechanically metal screw fixation to suture-button or bioabsorbable screw fixation for ankle syndesmotic injuries.MethodsA literature search of the comparison studies in Pubmed and Google Scholar was conducted. The biomechanical outcomes of interest were syndesmotic stability in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes as well as torque and rotation at failure.ResultsA total of 11 cadaveric studies were included. In the suture-button group, coronal displacement (MD 1.72 mm, p = 0.02) and sagittal displacement (MD 2.65 mm, p = 0.0003) were increased relative to the metal screw group. In contrast, no difference was found with axial rotation (MD 0.35 degrees, p = 0.57). Bioabsorbable screws exhibited equivalent failure torque (MD ?3.04 Nm, p = 0.53) and rotation at failure (MD 3.77 degrees, p = 0.48) in comparison to metal screws.ConclusionsSuture-button provide less rigidity when compared to metal screw fixation. They afford flexible syndesmotic micromotion which may more closely resemble a physiological state and be helpful for ligament healing. Bioabsorbable screws demonstrate similar mechanical strength properties to metal screws.     

Traumatic loss of talus: A rare injury

BackgroundTraumatic loss of talus during a compound injury of ankle is an unusual injury.ObjectiveWe report a 55 years old woman who sustained an open ankle injury with complete extrusion of talus and loss at the injury site.MethodA tricortical bone graft was obtained from iliac crest and talar dimensions carved with 5 cm length and 3 cm height given by buttressing fibular graft between them. These grafts are made in the shape of talus by fixing them together with cortical screw and binding them together with Ethibond No. 5. By anterior approach ankle was opened and talar graft was placed in between the raw surfaces of tibia and calcaneus to facilitate ankle arthrodesis.ResultPatient had solid fusion at the ankle joint after 4 months with no pain on walking.ConclusionThe definitive treatment of this serious lower extremity injury remains controversial we have attempted this novel way of treatment as the patient was unable to afford talar prosthesis and facilities of allogenic bone grafts were not there.