Large-volume leukapheresis in pediatric patients: pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell count predicts progenitor cell yield

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In children it is very important to optimize PBPC harvesting and to reduce the number of leukaphereses per patient. The value of pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell concentration as a predictor of PBPC yield was studied in 23 pediatric patients with hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies in order to optimize duration of PBPC collection. DESIGN AND METHODS: The patients underwent 25 stem-cell mobilization episodes with G-CSF alone and 40 large-volume leukapheresis procedures. Peripheral blood and harvested CD34+ cell concentrations were analyzed by means of flow cytometry. RESULTS: Using linear regression analysis, a highly significant correlation was found between the peripheral blood CD34+ cell count and the CD34+ cells/kg patient body weight collected on the apheresis day (r = 0.826, p = 0.0001). The results indicate that at least 1 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells can be harvested during one leukapheresis procedure in all patients if the pre-apheresis blood CD34+ cell count is > or = 30/microL and a CD34+ cell target of > or = 5 x 10(6)/kg is achieved in at least 80% of patients if this value is > or = 50 CD34+ cells/microL processing a median blood volume of 438.7 mL/kg (range, 207-560) over a median time of 232.5 minutes (range, 182-376). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the number of CD34+ cells harvested in a single large-volume leukapheresis can be predicted from the measurement of peripheral blood CD34+ cell concentration on the collection day.     

High-dose ara-C with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell support induces a marked progenitor cell mobilization: an indication for patients at risk for low mobilization

A high-dose (HD) chemotherapy scheme was designed for the collection of large numbers of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in lymphoma patients who were candidates for myeloablative therapy with autograft. The scheme included the sequential administration of HD cyclophosphamide (CY) (7 g/m(2)) and HD ara-C (2 g/m(2) twice a day for 6 consecutive days), followed by final consolidation with PBPC autograft. PBPC harvests were scheduled following both HD CY and HD ara-C. To minimize hematologic toxicity, small aliquots of PBPC (20 circulating CD34(+) cells/microl, whereas the remaining 19 'low-mobilizer' patients did not reach this cut-off value. In spite of poor mobilization after HD CY, 16 out of 19 low mobilizers provided good harvests following HD ara-C; overall, median collected CD34(+) cells x 10(6)/kg were 1.4 (0-3.1) and 10.2 (0-37) after HD CY and HD ara-C, respectively (P = 0.00007). Similar patterns were observed when PBPC were evaluated by CFU-GM/kg. Complete and durable hemopoietic reconstitution followed autograft with post HD ara-C PBPC. Within the high-mobilizer group, 88 patients received HD ara-C and 79 (90%) still showed high mobilization; overall, median collected CD34(+)cells x 10(6)/kg were 17.8 (range 3-94) and 19 (range 0-107) after HD CY and HD ara-C respectively (P = NS). Thus, the scheme allowed sufficient PBPC collections for autografting in low mobilizer patients; in addition, the scheme could be considered whenever extensive chemotherapy debulking is needed prior to PBPC collection.     

A randomized,multicenter study of G-CSF starting on day +1 vs day +5 after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

In order to assess the effect of delaying G-CSF administration after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation on the duration of neutropenia, 87 patients were randomized to receive G-CSF 5 microg/kg/day starting on day +1 (n = 45) or +5 (n = 42) following PBPC transplantation, until recovery of the neutrophils. The duration of neutropenia (<0.5 x 10(9)/l) was shorter in the day +1 group (7 vs 8 days; P = 0.02), especially in patients receiving melphalan 200 mg/m(2) and CD34(+) cell doses >3.0 x 10(6)/kg. These patients had a later onset of neutropenia after transplant. There were no differences in time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, or in the incidence of fever and documentation of infection. Although the duration of antibiotic therapy (7 vs 10.5 days; P = 0.01) and time to hospital discharge (13 vs 15 days; P = 0.02) were shorter in the day +1 group, these differences could not be predicted by the day of G-CSF initiation in multivariate analysis. Starting G-CSF on day +1 does not result in faster neutrophil engraftment but in later onset and consequently, slightly shorter duration of neutropenia in patients who receive melphalan 200 mg/m(2) and CD34(+) cell doses >3.0 x 10(6)/kg.     

A randomized multicenter comparison of CD34(+)-selected progenitor cells from blood vs from bone marrow in recipients of HLA-identical allogeneic transplants for hematological malignancies

OBJECTIVE: Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) have been established as an alternative source of hematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic transplantation, but an increased incidence of both acute and chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) has become apparent. We performed a prospective randomized trial comparing bone marrow transplantation (BMT) vs PBPC transplantation (PBPCT) using CD34(+) selection for T-cell depletion (TCD) in both study arms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1996 and October 2000, 120 patients with a diagnosis of acute leukemia, myelodysplasia, multiple myeloma, or lymphoma were randomized to receive either filgrastim-mobilized PBPC or BM from HLA-identical sibling donors after standard high-dose chemoradiotherapy. Patient characteristics did not differ between study arms. RESULTS: Recipients of PBPC received more CD3(+) T cells (median: 3.0 vs 2.0 x 10(5)/kg, p<0.0001) and more CD34(+) cells (median: 3.6 vs 0.9 x 10(6)/kg, p<0.0001). Neutrophil and platelet recoveries occurred significantly faster after PBPCT. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grades II-IV was 37% after BMT vs 52% after PBPCT and was most significantly (p=0.007) affected by the number of CD3(+) T cells in the graft. Acute GVHD appeared strongly associated with increased treatment-related mortality (TRM) in a time-dependent analysis. Higher numbers of CD34(+) cells were associated with less TRM. With a median follow-up of 37 months (range: 12-75), overall survival at 4 years from transplantation was 60% after BMT and 34% for recipients of PBPCT (p=0.04), which difference was largely due to increased GVHD and TRM in PBPC recipients receiving T-cell dosages greater than 2 x 10(5)/kg. CONCLUSION: Outcome following T cell-depleted PBPCT critically depends on the number of CD3(+) T cells, whereby high T-cell numbers may blunt a favorable effect of higher CD34(+) cell numbers.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone at 12 microg/kg twice a day for 4 days for peripheral blood progenitor cell priming in pediatric patients

In children, the optimal mobilization schedule for harvesting peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) is an issue of continuous research. We have studied a schedule based on high and daily divided doses of G-CSF (12 microg/kg body weight twice daily) for 4 days for PBPC priming. Toxicity related to G-CSF was observed in 13 patients (23%), mainly mild bone pain and myalgia. The median CD34(+)cell number collected was 4.4 (0.4-35 x 10(6)/kg body weight), with 46 patients achieving 2 x 10(6)/kg body weight (83.6%) after a single large volume leukapheresis. In conclusion, this mobilization schedule allows safe and efficient collection of the minimum target CD34(+) cell dose in most pediatric patients by only one procedure.     

Telomere length predicts neutrophil recovery in the absence of G-CSF after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Summary:Haemopoietic regeneration after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation can be delayed in some patients despite adequate infusion of CD34(+) cells. This suggests variability in the proliferation potential of the implanted cells, a capacity that may be predicted by their telomere length. To test this theory, telomere length was measured on stored apheresis samples from 36 patients aged 46.6+/-11.1 years, who had undergone successful autologous PBPC transplantation with a median of 5.6 x 10(6)/kg (1.3 x 10(6)-36.1 x 10(6)/kg) CD34(+) cells. The mean PBPC telomere length for the cohort was 9.4+/-2.3 kbp. For patients who did not receive G-CSF post transplantation (n=7), days to absolute neutrophil recovery (ANC), >/=0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 x 10(9) cells/l, were significantly inversely correlated with telomere length of the infused PBPC (r=-0.88, -0.81, -0.77, respectively; P<0.05,). However, no correlation was found for patients who received G-CSF from day 1 post transplantation (n=20). These data suggest that for transplantation with sufficient CD34(+) cells, neutrophil recovery is less efficient in patients receiving infusions of cells with short telomeres, but this deficiency can be corrected with adequate post transplantation administration of G-CSF.Bone Marrow Transplantation (2004) 34, 439-445. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1704607 Published online 19 July 2004     

Peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in cancer patients: analysis of factors affecting the yields

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are now widely used to restore hematopoiesis following high dose chemotherapy in patients with malignancies. We sought to identify parameters that could predict the yield of PBPC after mobilization with chemotherapy (CT) with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in cancer patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients underwent 627 PBPC collections during the recovery phase following CT with (n = 469) or without (n = 142) G-CSF. Hemogram, CFC-assays and CD34+ cell count were performed on peripheral blood and leukaphereses products. After log transformation of the data, differences between groups were assessed with the unpaired t-test or one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Seventeen and two patients required 2 and 3 mobilization cycles respectively to reach our target of 15x10(4) CFU-GM/kg. In patients with lymphoma but not in those with leukemia, the yields of both CFU-GM and CD34+ cells/kg were dramatically increased when G-CSF was added to CT for mobilization. In collections primed with CT and G-CSF, better yields were obtained in patients with breast cancer or small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) as opposed to other solid tumors and leukemia. Among potential predictive factors of CT- and G-CSF-primed harvests, we found that the CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood (PB) was strongly correlated with both the CFU-GM and CD34+ cell yields. Except in leukemia patients, more than 1x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were harvested when the CD34+ cell count in blood was above 20x10(6)/L. Similarly, better results were obtained in collections performed when the percentage of myeloid progenitors in blood on the day of apheresis was above 5 % or when the leukocyte count in blood was above 5x10(9)/L. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: A diagnosis of breast cancer or SCLC, a leukocyte count in PB of more than 5x10(9)/L, more than 5% myeloid progenitors or more than 20x10(6) CD34+ cells/L in PB were associated with higher yields of PBPC in collections mobilized with CT+G-CSF.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in patients undergoing chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (SCT) for high risk breast cancer (HRBC).

We have determined the effect of delayed addition of G-CSF after chemotherapy on PBPC mobilization in a group of 30 patients with high risk breast cancer (HRBC) undergoing standard chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous SCT. Patients received FAC chemotherapy every 21 days followed by G-CSF at doses of 5 microg/kg/day starting on day +15 (groups 1 and 2) or +8 (group 3) after chemotherapy. PBPC collections were performed daily starting after 4 doses of G-CSF and continued until more than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells had been collected. In group 1, steady-state BM progenitors were also harvested and used for SCT. Groups 2 and 3 received PBPC only. The median number of collections was three in each group. Significantly more PB CD34+ cells were collected in patients receiving G-CSF starting on day 8 vs day 15 (9.43 x 10(6)/kg and 6.2 x 10(6)/kg, respectively) (P < 0.05). After conditioning chemotherapy all harvested cells including BM and PBPC were reinfused. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was significantly faster in patients transplanted with day 8 G-CSF-mobilized PBPC (P < 0.05) and was associated with lower transplant related morbidity as reflected by days of fever, antibiotics or hospitalization (P < 0.05). Both schedules of mobilization provided successful long-term engraftment with 1 year post-transplant counts above 80% of pretransplant values. In conclusion, we demonstrate that delayed addition of G-CSF results in successful mobilization and collection of PBPC with significant advantage of day 8 G-CSF vs day 15. PBPC collections can be scheduled on a fixed day instead of being guided by the PB counts which provides a practical advantage. Transplantation of such progenitors results in rapid short-term and long-term trilineage engraftment.     

Long-term hematopoietic engraftment after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in pediatric patients: effect of the CD34+ cell dose

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the relationship between long-term hematopoietic recovery and the number of CD34+ cells infused in order to determine the optimal dose of CD34+ cells for rapid and stable engraftment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1993 and December 1998, 96 consecutive autologous transplantations were performed in 92 pediatric patients with different malignancies. Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were mobilized by G-CSF alone (12 microg/kg/day s.c., Neupogen((R)); Amgen, Thousand Oaks, Calif., USA) and collected using a Cobe Spectra blood cell separator (Cobe, Denver, Colo., USA) through a central venous catheter with double lumen. The CD34+ cell contents of apheresis products were assessed by means of flow-cytometric analysis using an Epics Elite flow cytometer (Coulter, USA). RESULTS: The median number of CD34+ cells infused was 3.2 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.17-44.4). The median times for short-term engraftment (neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l and platelet count >20 x 10(9)/l) was 9 (range: 7-16) and 13 days (range: 7-91), respectively. The median times for long-term engraftment (platelet count >50 x 10(9)/l and >100 x 10(9)/l) was 21 (range: 10-249) and 45 days (range: 12-288). When the infused CD34+ cell dose was >/=5 x 10(6)/kg (median 7.99, range 5.01-44.4), there was a statistically significant increase in the rate of short- and long-term hematopoietic recovery compared to patients transplanted with a lower number of CD34+ cells (p < 0.0001). The earlier recovery in the high CD34+ cell group resulted in less transfusional support, fewer days on intravenous antibiotics and shorter hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that G-CSF-mobilized PBPC provide rapid short- and long-term hematopoietic engraftment in pediatric patients undergoing autologous transplantation if a CD34+ cell dose >/=5.0 x 10(6)/kg is infused. As this PBPC dose seems to have clinical and potentially economic implications, it should be considered the optimal dose for apheresis.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with vinorelbine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in multiple myeloma patients is reliable and cost effective

Cyclophosphamide with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly used to mobilize stem cells in multiple myeloma. Timing of collection is variable and incidence and severity of side effects is substantial. To optimize timing of collection, to reduce side effects and to limit costs of the procedure, we evaluated vinorelbine, a drug shown to have activity in multiple myeloma, in combination with G-CSF as mobilizing regimen. A total of 19 consecutive patients with advanced stage multiple myeloma received one dose of vinorelbine 35 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 in an outpatient setting and G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day from day 4 divided in two daily doses. Median CD34+ cell blood counts measured on day 8 of mobilization were 142 x 10(6)/l (range 57-467). One 15-l apheresis on day 8 resulted in sufficient stem cells (median 11.1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, range 6.2-36.0 prior and median 7.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, range 4.0-20.2 post-positive CD34+ cell selection) for transplantation. Hematopoietic recovery was swift with ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/l on day 11 median (range 10-15) and platelets >20 x 10(9)/l on day 12 median (range 10-15) after reinfusion of the stem cells on day 0. No episodes of febrile neutropenia were observed during mobilization. In our institutions cost reduction for the procedure was about 1700 euros compared to the mobilization with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. Vinorelbine and G-CSF allow precise timing and harvesting of sufficient stem cells, and might be an alternative to cyclophosphamide in the mobilization of stem cells for autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.     

Optimizing peripheral blood progenitor cell autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.

As in other malignancies, peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) have almost completely replaced bone marrow as the source of stem cells for autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma. PBPC collection could be optimized either by reducing contamination by the malignant clone or by increasing hematopoietic quality of the graft. Currently, the most promising technique for purifying the harvest is CD34 cell selection. Several pilot studies have shown the feasibility of this method in MM. However controlled studies are necessary to assess the clinical impact of CD34+ cell selection. In the IFM 94 study, CD34+ selection was optional. There was no significant difference between 50 patients receiving a CD34+ selected graft and 133 patients receiving non-selected PBPC, as regards duration of neutropenia, duration of thrombocytopenia, response rate, EFS or survival. Hematopoietic recovery after transplantation is related to the number of CD34+ cells infused. The optimal regimen for mobilizing the requested CD34+ yield is not yet known. We have completed a randomized study comparing the combination of SCF plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone after priming with cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2. The median number of leukaphereses to reach the target yield of 5x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was 1 in the SCF group (N=55) versus 2 in the G-CSF group (N=47) (p=0.008). The median number of CD34+ cells collected in the first leukapheresis was 11. 6x10(6) in the SCF group versus 4x10(6) in the G-CSF group (p=0.003). These results are in line with those observed in other trials testing the combination of SCF and G-CSF to improve PBPC collection.     

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells in newly diagnosed myeloma patients without any prior cytoreductive therapy: the first step towards an 'operational cure'?

We have shown that primary therapy with non-myeloablative (140 mg/m(2)) high-dose melphalan (HDM) without hematopoietic support results in high response rates in untreated myeloma and very long-term survival of some patients. This study was designed to see if sufficient CD34 (+) cells can be harvested at presentation in newly diagnosed patients to administer myeloablative HDM (200 mg/m(2); HDM200) with autograft as primary therapy. This may improve outcome by rapid achievement of complete remission (CR) and possible avoidance of late myelodysplasia as a consequence of non-transplant induction chemotherapy. Thirty untreated patients received 1 g/m(2) methylprednisolone daily (days 1-6) and 12-16 micro g/kg G-CSF daily (days 3-6), and underwent leukapheresis on days 6 and 7. The median CD34(+) cell yield was 1.31 x10(6)/kg (range, 0.23-5.63), and was > or =1 x10(6)/kg in 73%. Cell yields were significantly lower than in 82 historical controls apheresed after completion of induction chemotherapy (median 2.16 x 10(6)/kg), and improved in patients who were apheresed again after induction chemotherapy. Three patients received primary therapy with HDM200 and autograft using these cells and attained CR. We conclude that it is possible to harvest stem cells in three-quarters of untreated myeloma patients. Increasing the number of apheresis procedures is needed to improve the number of CD34(+) cells collected.     

Very large amounts of peripheral blood progenitor cells eliminate severe thrombocytopenia after high-dose melphalan in advanced breast cancer patients

We analyzed the relationship between the reinfusion of large or very large amounts of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and hematologic toxicity in twenty-one advanced breast cancer patients subjected to a myeloablative dose of melphalan at the end of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy (HDSC) program. We also evaluated the influence of the white blood cell (WBC) count to predict an optimal PBPC harvest after high-dose chemotherapy and growth factor priming. Twenty-one patients with high-risk or metastatic breast cancer sequentially received: high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-Cy) and G-CSF followed by PBPC harvest, HD-methotrexate plus vincristine, HD-doxorubicin, cisplatin and finally HD-melphalan 200 mg/m2 (HD-L-PAM) followed by PBPC reinfusion. No growth factor was administered after HD-L-PAM. CD34+ cytofluorimetric analysis, WBC count and clonogenic assays were employed to monitor circulating cells and to analyze the PBPC harvest. Correlation between different PBPC doses and hematologic toxicity as well as leukocyte and platelet recovery time was attempted. Patients received a median number of 16 (4-25.1) x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells, 81.3 (30.8-228) x 10(4)/kg CFU-GM and 4.2 (1.3-7.3) x 10(8)/kg nucleated cells (NC) after HD-L-PAM. The number of days with fewer than 1 x 10(9)/l leukocytes and 20 x 10(9)/l platelets were 6 (range 4-9) and 0 (range 0-3), respectively. The CD34+ cell dose significantly correlated with both platelet count nadir (r = 0.73) and time to 50 x 10(9)/l platelets (r = 0.7), but did not correlate with time to reach more than 1 x 10(9)/l WBC count (r = 0.2). In particular, we found that in 12 patients given very large amounts of CD34+ cells, ranging between 15.8 and 25. 1 x 10(6)/kg (V-LA-CD34+), the platelet nadir count never fell below 20 x 10(9)/l and platelet transfusions were not required. Conversely, nine patients who received only large amounts of CD34+ cells, ranging between 4 and 12 x 10(6)/kg (LA-CD34+), experienced a platelet nadir lower than 20 x 10(9)/l and required 2 days (range 1-4) to achieve independence from platelet transfusions (P = 0.001 and P = 0. 0005). The requirement for packed red blood cells (RBC) was 1.5 vs 3 units in the V-LA-CD34+ and LA-CD34+ groups respectively (P = 0.063). The analysis of 44 PBPC collections demonstrated that 29 aphereses performed with a WBC count <20 x 10(9)/l yielded a mean of 312 +/- 43 x 10(6) CD34+ cells and 1831 +/- 201 x 10(4) CFU-GM, whereas 15 collections performed with WBC count >20 x 10(9)/l yielded 553 +/- 64 x 10(6) CD34+ cells and 3190 +/- 432 x 10(4) CFU-GM (P = 0.004). In conclusion, our data suggests that V-LA-CD34+ eliminates severe thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusion requirements in breast cancer patients subjected to HD-L-PAM, and higher PBPC collections seems to coincide with WBC count higher than 20 x 10(9)/l after HD-Cy and G-CSF mobilization. These results justify a prospective study to establish whether large doses of CD34+ cells result in significant clinical benefits.     

Ancestim (recombinant human stem cell factor, SCF) in association with filgrastim does not enhance chemotherapy and/or growth factor-induced peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in patients with a prior insufficient PBPC collection

Up to a third of autologous transplantation candidates fail to mobilize hematopoietic progenitors into the peripheral blood with chemotherapy and/or growth factor treatment, thus requiring innovative mobilization strategies. In total, 20 cancer patients unable to provide adequate PBPC products after a previous mobilization attempt were treated with ancestim (20 microg/kg/day s.c.) and filgrastim (10 microg/kg/day s.c.). In 16 patients, the pre-study mobilization was with filgrastim alone. Eight patients underwent single large volume leukapheresis (LVL) and 12 multiple standard volume leukaphereses (SVL) in both mobilizations. Pairwise comparison of peripheral blood CD34(+) cell concentrations on the day of first leukapheresis failed to document synergism - median CD34(+)/microl of 3.2 (<0.1 to 15.4) and 4.5 (1-28.56) for the pre-study and on-study mobilizations (P = 0.79, sign test), and 4.2 (<0.1-15.4) and 5 (1-28.56), respectively, for the 16 patients previously mobilized with filgrastim alone (P = 1, sign test). The number of CD34(+) cells/kg collected per unit of blood volume (BV) processed was similar in both mobilizations - median 0.1 x 10(6)/kg/BV and 0.09 x 10(6)/kg/BV, respectively (P = 1, sign test). In this phase II study, the combination of ancestim and filgrastim did not allow adequate PBPC mobilization and collection in patients with a previous suboptimal PBPC collection.     

Optimising parameters for peripheral blood leukapheresis after r-metHuG-CSF (filgrastim) and r-metHuSCF (ancestim) in patients with multiple myeloma: a temporal analysis of CD34(+) absolute counts and subsets

Patients (n = 69) with multiple myeloma undergoing peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) were treated with cyclophosphamide and a combination of recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF, filgrastim) and recombinant methionyl human stem cell factor (r-metHuSCF, ancestim). The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) The proportion of patients reaching a target yield of >or=5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in one or two successive large-volume (20 liter) leukapheresis procedures; (2) the optimal collection time for leukapheresis; (3) mobilization kinetics of CD34(+) subsets in response to G-CSF/SCF. All patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide (2.5 g/m(2)) on day 0 followed by filgrastim (10 microg/kg ) plus ancestim (20 microg/kg) commencing day 1 and continuing to day 11 or 12. Of the 65 evaluable patients, 57 were considered not heavily pretreated and 96.5% obtained a target of >or=5 x 10(6)/kg in one collection. The median CD34(+) cells/kg was 39.5 x 10(6) (range: 5.2-221.2 x 10(6)). Subset analysis demonstrated the number of CD38(-), CD33(-), and CD133(+) peaked at day 11; and CD34(+), CD90(+) cells peaked at day 10. The optimum day for leukapheresis was determined to be day 11. The median absolute peripheral blood CD34(+) cell numbers on day 11 was 665 x 10(6)/l (range: 76-1481 x 10(6)/l). Eight of the 10 heavily pretreated patients were evaluable: three achieved the target dose in one leukapheresis (37.5%) and three (37.5%) achieved the target dose with two leukaphereses. Use of this mobilization strategy allowed the collection of high numbers of CD34(+) cells and early progenitors and the ability to predictably schedule leukapheresis.     

Etoposide (VP-16) plus G-CSF mobilizes different dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone

Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells that are critical to the generation of immunologic tumor responses. Myeloid DCs (DC1) express myeloid antigen CD11c; lymphoid DCs (DC2) express CD123(+) and are CD11c(-). Analysis of DC subsets from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) collected from normal donors mobilized with G-CSF shows a predominance of DC2 cells. Whether PBPCs mobilization by chemotherapy yields different subsets of DCs has not been studied. We analyzed DC subsets in apheresis products from 44 patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation from 6/00 to 5/01. Patients received either G-CSF alone (10 microg/kg per day, n=11) or etoposide (2 g/m(2)) plus G-CSF (n=33) for progenitor cell mobilization. The patients were apheresed for 2-10 days (median 3) to reach a minimum of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Patients receiving G-CSF alone mobilized significantly more total DC2s than did those receiving etoposide plus G-CSF (median 6.2 x 10(6)/kg vs 2.9 x 10(6)/kg, P=0.001). The DC2/DC1 ratio was also significantly different in the two groups, with the G-CSF group having a higher ratio (median 1.2 vs 0.4, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of chemotherapy plus G-CSF yields different mobilized dendritic cell subsets than does G-CSF alone.     

Recombinant human thrombopoietin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor enhances mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells, increases peripheral blood platelet concentration, and accelerates hematopoietic recovery following high-dose chemotherapy

Lineage-specific growth factors mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and accelerate hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) may further increase the progenitor-cell content and regenerating potential of PBPC products. We evaluated the safety and activity of rhTPO as a PBPC mobilizer in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 29 breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by PBPC reinfusion. Initially, patients received escalating single doses of rhTPO intravenously (IV) at 0.6, 1.2, or 2.4 micrograms/kg, on day 1. Subsequent patients received rhTPO 0.6 or 0.3 micrograms/kg on days -3, -1, and 1, or 0.6 micrograms/kg on days -1 and 1. G-CSF, 5 micrograms/kg IV or subcutaneously (SC) twice daily, was started on day 3 and continued through aphereses. Twenty comparable, concurrently and identically treated patients (who were eligible and would have been treated on protocol but for the lack of study opening) mobilized with G-CSF alone served as comparisons. CD34(+) cell yields were substantially higher with the first apheresis following rhTPO and G-CSF versus G-CSF alone: 4.1 x 10(6)/kg (range, 1.3 to 17.6) versus 0.8 x 10(6)/ kg (range, 0.3 to 4.2), P =.0003. The targeted minimum yield of 3 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg was procured following a single apheresis procedure in 61% of the rhTPO and G-CSF-mobilized group versus 10% of G-CSF-mobilized patients (P =.001). In rhTPO and G-CSF mobilized patients, granulocyte (day 8 v 9, P =.0001) and platelet recovery (day 9 v 10, P =.07) were accelerated, and fewer erythrocyte (3 v 4, P =.02) and platelet (4 v 5, P =.02) transfusions were needed compared with G-CSF-mobilized patients. Peripheral blood platelet counts, following rhTPO and G-CSF, were increased by greater than 100% and the platelet content of PBPC products by 60% to 110% on the first and second days of aphereses (P <.0001) with the greatest effect seen with repeated dosing of rhTPO at 0.6 microgram/kg. rhTPO is safe and well tolerated as a mobilizing agent before PBPC collection. Mobilization with rhTPO and G-CSF, in comparison to a comparable, nonrandomized G-CSF-mobilized group of patients, decreases the number of apheresis procedures required, may accelerate hematopoietic recovery, and may reduce the number of transfusions required following high-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer.     

Hemopoietic Recovery and Infectious Complications in Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma after Autologous CD34<Superscript>+</Superscript> Cell-Selected Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation

Autografting with CD34+ cell-selected peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) is often associated with a prolonged recovery time and a higher incidence of infections. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether underlying disease influences hemopoietic recovery and the infectious complications occurring after transplantation. We studied 19 breast cancer (BC) patients and 17 multiple myeloma (MM) patients entered in a high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) program of tandem autografting with CD34+ cell-selected PBPC. PBPC were collected after mobilizing chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and were processed for selection of CD34+ cells. After selection, a median of 53% CD34+ cells was recovered with a median final purity of 92% with no significant differences between the MM (52% and 92%, respectively) and BC (53% and 89%, respectively) patients. Medians of 4.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells (BC, 4.4 x 10(6)/kg; MM, 5.4 x 10(6)/kg) and 18 x 10(4)/kg colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (BC, 21 x 10(4)/kg: MM, 16 x 10(4)/kg) were reinfused after each HDC. Twenty-six patients (10 MM and 16 BC) underwent tandem autografting, and 10 patients received only 1 autograft because of inadequate collection (5 patients), clinical condition (3 patients), and refusal (2 patients). In the BC patients, the HDC regimen included a high-dose melphalan course followed by an ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) course. In the MM patients, the regimen consisted of a course of high-dose melphalan therapy and a course of ICBV (idarubicin, cyclophosphamide [Cytoxan], BCNU, and etoposide) or total body irradiation, etoposide, and Cytoxan. We found a significantly prolonged time for neutrophil recovery to > 500/microL in the MM patients (13 days versus 10 days; P < .002), whereas the times for platelet recovery to > 20,000/microL in the two groups were not different (13 days versus 12 days; not significant). No late engraftment failures and no toxic deaths were observed. The incidences of extrahematologic toxicity were similar for the two patient groups. All patients received similar anti-infection prophylaxis for 3 months after transplantation. After 12 months of observation, we found a statistically significant higher incidence of bacterial infections in MM patients in both the early (77.8% versus 48.6%; P < .034) and the late (41.1% versus 0%; P < .014) posttransplantation periods, whereas the incidences of fungal infections were similar in the two groups. Viral infections consisted of herpes zoster virus infection in 2 patients of each group, and cytomegalovirus infection was observed in 3 MM patients and no BC patients. Our experience demonstrates a prolonged neutrophil recovery time and higher incidences of bacterial and viral infections in MM patients compared with BC patients. These observations, although limited by the small sample size, suggest that the underlying disease may influence the incidence of infections after CD34- cell-selected transplantation and should be considered in the planning of appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis in the autologous transplantation setting.     

CD34+ dose-driven administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose chemotherapy in lymphoma patients

Our goal was to optimize use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation in lymphoma patients, limiting G-CSF administration to patients infusing a suboptimal CD34(+) cell number. Of 124 consecutive patients with histologically proven Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma from January 2001 to June 2004, 60 patients (group 1) given > or = 5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells received no G-CSF; 64 patients (group 2) given < or = 5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells received G-CSF from day +5 after stem-cell reinfusion. The median times to reach 0.5 x 10(9)/L and 1.0 x 10(9)/L neutrophils were, respectively, 3 and 4 d shorter in G-CSF group and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0014; P = 0.0001). In terms of antibiotic and antimycotic requirements, gastrointestinal toxicity, days of hospitalization, and transfusion requirements, no differences were demonstrated between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated for the total number of febrile episodes (52 for group 1; 53 for group 2; P = 0.623) and the median number of febrile days (2 d for both groups). Myeloid reconstitution values for both groups agree with published results for autotransplanted patients treated with G-CSF from 7 to 14 d. Also, major clinical events, antibiotic, antimycotic, and transfusion requirements, and hospital stay were similar to published findings. Our data suggest that G-CSF administration can be safely optimized, used only for patients infused with a suboptimal CD34(+) cell dose.     

CD34 selected alloPBSCT and adoptive immunotherapy

To circumvent aGVHD in the early phase after allogeneic stem cell transplantation but to provide GVL activity later on, we performed alloPBSCT with CD34+ selected grafts followed by delayed add-back of CD3+ T cells. Ten consecutive patients having an HLA-identical sibling donor were enrolled on to this trial. Four patients were in first CR of high-risk ALL, another four in first CR of AML, one was in second myeloid blast crisis of CML, and one was in PR of relapsed NHL. Conditioning consisted of 2 x 60 mg/kg CY plus 12 Gy TBI. G-CSF (Filgrastim) mobilized peripheral cells were CD34+ selected using the Isolex 300i system in nine patients and the CliniMacs system in one. Median CD34+ purity was 86%. A median of 2.8 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells were transplanted. The number of CD3+ cells in the allografts was 5.7 x 10(4)/kg (median) after Isolex 300i, and 0.2 x 10(4)/kg after CliniMacs. All patients received G-CSF (Filgrastim) and engrafted rapidly. Standard-dose CsA was administered, and until day +60 no aGVHD occurred. At that time point, seven patients received 2 x 10(6)/kg CD3+ cells while CsA had been tapered to 50% of the starting dose. One of these patients died after a second T cell boost given on day +90 without concomitant immunosuppression due to grade IV intestinal aGVHD. Three others developed cutaneous cGVHD. Taken together, T cell depletion by CD34+ selection does not impair rapid engraftment in the HLA-identical sibling donor setting. Using standard-dose CsA the risk for acute GVHD seems to be minimized. Add-back of 2 x 10(6)/kg CD3+ cells on day +60 with CsA protection is feasible. However, whether this is the optimal time point and number of T cells remain to be further elucidated.