Botulinum toxin A treatment of adult upper and lower limb spasticity

This article discusses the treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin A as a new approach in the neurological rehabilitation of patients after stroke. Clinical studies have been reviewed to provide information about target groups, technical aspects and the advantages and disadvantages of treating spasticity with botulinum toxin A. Open and controlled studies showed that the intramuscular injection of Dysport 500 to 1,500U or Botox 100 to 300U could reversibly relieve upper limb flexor and lower limb extensor spasticity. A reduced muscle tone, pain relief, better hand hygiene and improved walking function were the main benefits. Patients tolerated the treatment well. Activity or, if not possible, electrical stimulation of the injected muscles may enhance the effectiveness of the costly toxin. Serial casting is another option. With respect to the action of botulinum toxin A, it is suggested that the effect of the toxin could be mediated by paresis of both the extrafusal and intrafusal muscle fibres, thereby altering the afferent discharge in the muscle.     

A型肉毒毒素治疗脑中风和脑外伤后下肢痉挛的临床研究

目的　探讨A型肉毒毒素 (botulinumtoxinA ,BTXa)能否有效、安全地治疗下肢肌痉挛 ,改善步行能力及步行速度。方法　 2 7例中风、脑外伤患者 ,选择下肢肌肉局部注射国产BTXa。每个病人每次选择 3～ 5块肌肉 ,每块肌肉总的注射剂量介于 5 0～ 10 0U ,每次病人接受的注射总量小于或等于 40 0U。所有病人同时接受步态训练等康复治疗。注射前、注射后 2、4wk按改良式Ashworth量表 (ModifiedAsh worthScale ,MAS)评定肌张力 ,足印分析法 (footprintanaly sis)测量并记录步行时的时间距离参数的变化 ,研究各肌群肌张力变化与步态参数的关系。结果　整体比较 ,注射后 2wk(股直肌除外 )、4wk与注射前相比 ,各肌群肌张力降低 ,差异有显著性 (P <0 0 5 ) ,步态时间距离参数值 (T D值 )除步角外 ,各参数均有不同程度改善 (P <0 0 1或 <0 0 5 )。注射前与注射后 4wk比较 ,步长、步宽、步速差异均有显著性(P <0 0 5 )。注射后 2wk与 4wk比较 ,步长、步速有改善(P <0 0 5 )而步宽、步角变化不大。spearman相关分析表明各肌群肌张力降低与步长具有较好的相关性。结论　BTXa下肢肌肉局部注射结合步态训练 ,可以明显改善中风、脑外伤的痉挛步态 ,由此显示局部的化学去神经方法与康复训练相结合 ,可以使特定的功能改?     

Botulinum toxin treatment of adult spasticity : a benefit-risk assessment.

Injections of botulinum toxin have revolutionised the treatment of focal spasticity. Before their advent, the medical treatment for focal spasticity involved oral anti-spasticity drugs, which had decidedly non-focal adverse effects, and phenol injections. Phenol injections could be difficult to perform, could cause sensory complications and had effects that were of uncertain duration and magnitude. Furthermore, few neurologists knew how to perform them as they were mostly the province of rehabilitation specialists. Botulinum toxin can produce focal, controllable muscle weakness of predictable duration, without sensory adverse effects.Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) involving patients with spasticity resulting from a variety of diseases (mainly stroke and multiple sclerosis) have clearly shown that botulinum toxin type A (Dysport and Botox) can temporarily (for approximately 3 months) reduce spastic hypertonia in the elbow, wrist and finger flexors of the upper limbs, and the hip adductors and ankle plantar flexors in the lower limbs. The clinical benefits from this reduction of neurological impairment are best shown in the upper limb, with less disability of passive function and reduced caregiver burden. In the lower limbs, there is improved perineal hygiene from hip adductor injections. The benefits of reducing ankle plantar flexor tone are less well established. Pain is also reduced, possibly by mechanisms other than muscle weakness. Improved active function has not yet been clearly demonstrated in RCTs, only in open-label trials. The safety of botulinum toxin-A is impressive, with minimal (mainly local) adverse effects.There are little data on the use of botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc or Neurobloc) in spasticity and the only RCT that has examined this did not show tone reduction; dry mouth appeared to be a very common adverse effect. There are also very little data to allow a benefit-risk comparison of phenol and botulinum toxin injections; each have their clinical and technical advantages and disadvantages, and phenol is much less costly than botulinum toxin.     

Spasticity associated with cerebral palsy in children: guidelines for the use of botulinum A toxin

Botulinum A toxin produces selective and reversible chemodenervation that can be employed to balance muscle forces across joints in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Currently, there are two commercially available botulinum A toxin formulations (BOTOX) and Dysport). The amount of botulinum A toxin required depends upon the number of muscles that are targeted, and the size of the patient. In order to achieve adequate chemodenervation with botulinum A toxin, the following conditions must be met: (i) a sufficient number of units of toxin must be injected in order to neutralize neuromuscular junction (NMJ) activity; (ii) an appropriate drug volume is required in order to optimize the delivery of the toxin to the NMJs; and (iii) localization of the injecting needle through the fascia of the target muscle is necessary. Localization of the injection may be facilitated by active electromyography, ultrasonography, palpation of the muscle belly, and/or use of anatomic landmarks. Botulinum A toxin injections are indicated for use in pediatric patients with CP to: (i) improve motor function by balancing muscle forces across joints; (ii) improve health-related quality of life by decreasing spasticity and/or decreasing caregiver burden; (iii) decrease pain from spasticity; (iv) enhance self-esteem by diminishing inappropriate motor responses; and (v) provide a presurgical diagnostic tool. Following intramuscular injections of botulinum A toxin, short-term benefits of reduced spasticity are observed in approximately 70-82% of children. The intermediate term (1-2 years) efficacy rate is approximately 50%. The most common deformity treated with toxin injections in pediatric patients with CP is equinus foot deformity. However, efficacy of toxin injections for the management of crouched gait, pelvic flexion contracture, cervical spasticity, seating difficulties, and upper extremity deformity also has been documented. In addition, toxin injections have been shown to manage painful muscle spasticity associated with surgery or application of casts and painful cervical spasticity with or without dystonia. Toxin injections can also be used as a diagnostic tool to determine the appropriateness of other interventions by observing the muscle response to the injection in order to gain additional information for the development of a treatment plan. Botulinum A toxin, when used in appropriate doses, is well tolerated.     

Botulinum toxin A (Dysport®): in dystonias and focal spasticity

Dysport?, a formulation of botulinum toxin A, blocks acetylcholine release at neuromuscular junctions causing denervation and temporary muscle paralysis. It is used to treat several medical conditions, including dystonias and focal spasticity. Subcutaneous Dysport? was effective in improving functional disability in adults with blepharospasm in a placebo-controlled trial with 16 weeks' follow-up, and in adults with hemifacial spasm in case series. Similarly, intramuscular Dysport? was effective in improving symptoms of cervical dystonia in adults, focal spasticity in adults with post-stroke upper limb spasticity and dynamic equinus spasticity in paediatric patients with cerebral palsy in placebo-controlled trials with up to 20 weeks' follow-up. However, in two 12-week, placebo-controlled trials in adults with focal lower limb spasticity (spastic equinovarus deformity after stroke and hip adductor spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis) intramuscular Dysport? had limited efficacy. Available longer-term data indicated that Dysport? treatment was effective over several treatment cycles in patients with cervical dystonia or upper limb spasticity. Dysport? was generally well tolerated in patients with dystonias or focal spasticity. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and transient.     

Unlabeled uses of botulinum toxins: a review, part 1.

PURPOSE: Efficacy and safety data regarding the unlabeled uses of botulinum toxins are reviewed, and the pharmacology, adverse effects, and characteristics of commercially available botulinum toxins are discussed. SUMMARY: More than 300 articles have been published on the use of botulinum toxins, particularly botulinum toxin type A, to treat conditions characterized by excessive smooth or skeletal muscle spasticity. Botulinum toxins are synthesized by Clostridium botulinum and cause temporary local paralysis of the injected muscle by inhibiting acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. While botulinum toxins have Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling to treat a limited number of spasticity disorders, including cervical dystonia and blepharospasm, the toxins have more than 50 reported therapeutic uses. Among these uses, the most rigorously studied indications include achalasia, essential tremors, palmar hyperhidrosis, chronic anal fissures, headache prophylaxis, and limb spasticity. The main adverse effects of the toxins are pain and erythema at the injection site, although unintended paralysis of muscles adjacent to the site of toxin injection may also occur. CONCLUSION: Clinical studies support the use of botulinum toxins for certain conditions, although more studies are needed to establish the role of the drug relative to conventional therapies and to determine patient predictors of response. Although botulinum toxins are generally well tolerated, a patient-specific risk-benefit assessment should precede any decision to use them for unlabeled indications.     

A型肉毒毒素治疗偏头痛的临床研究

目的:观察A型肉毒毒素治疗预防偏头痛 发作的临床疗效和不良反应。方法:选取30例偏头 痛病人,应用A型肉毒毒素进行颅周肌内注射治 疗,问卷调查记录每例偏头痛病人治疗前3mo,治 疗后mo1,2,3偏头痛发作情况,比较偏头痛发作频 率、发作持续时间、发作严重程度及使用止痛药物情 况,观察不良反应。结果:A型肉毒毒素治疗后 mo1,偏头痛发作频率、发作持续时间、发作严重程 度均较治疗前明显下降(P<0.01),止痛药物的使 用较治疗前减少(P<0.01),疗效可至少维持3mo, 且不良反应轻微、短暂。结论:A型肉毒毒素颅周肌 内注射治疗预防偏头痛发作临床疗效显著,不良反 应轻微、短暂,值得临床研究。     

Unlabeled uses of botulinum toxins: a review, part 2.

PURPOSE: Efficacy and safety data regarding the unlabeled uses of botulinum toxins are reviewed, and the pharmacology, adverse effects, and characteristics of commercially available botulinum toxins are discussed. SUMMARY: More than 300 articles have been published on the use of botulinum toxins, particularly botulinum toxin type A, to treat conditions characterized by excessive smooth or skeletal muscle spasticity. Botulinum toxins are synthesized by Clostridium botulinum and cause temporary local paralysis of the injected muscle by inhibiting acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. While botulinum toxins have Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling to treat a limited number of spasticity disorders, including cervical dystonia and blepharospasm, the toxins have more than 50 reported therapeutic uses. Among these uses, the most rigorously studied indications include achalasia, essential tremors, palmar hyperhidrosis, chronic anal fissures, headache prophylaxis, and limb spasticity. The main adverse effects of the toxins are pain and erythema at the injection site, although unintended paralysis of muscles adjacent to the site of toxin injection may also occur. CONCLUSION: Clinical studies support the use of botulinum toxins for certain conditions, although more studies are needed to establish the role of the drug relative to conventional therapies and to determine patient predictors of response. Although botulinum toxins are generally well tolerated, a patient-specific risk-benefit assessment should precede any decision to use them for unlabeled indications.     

Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type A on Pain among Trigeminal Neuralgia,Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders,and Oromandibular Dystonia

The differences in analgesic effects of botulinum toxin type A were compared in 28 patients with trigeminal neuralgia, 53 patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders, and 89 patients with the jaw closing oromandibular dystonia. The patients were treated by injection of botulinum toxin type A into the masseter, temporalis, medial pterygoid, and other muscles based on the symptoms of each patient. The pain severity was evaluated using the visual analog scale, pain frequency, and pain scale of the oromandibular dystonia rating scale. Botulinum toxin injection was performed 1068 times in all patients without significant adverse effects. The visual analog, pain frequency, and pain scales at baseline were reduced (p < 0.001) after two, four, eight, and 12 weeks after the first botulinum toxin therapy and at the endpoint. The effects differed significantly (p < 0.001) among the groups (repeated-measures analysis of variance). The mean improvement (0%, no effect; 100%, complete recovery) at the endpoint was 86.8% for trigeminal neuralgia, 80.8% for myofascial pain, and 75.4% for oromandibular dystonia. Injection of the botulinum toxin can be a highly effective and safe method to treat trigeminal neuralgia, myofascial pain, and oromandibular dystonia.     

Electrical Stimulation of Injected Muscles to Boost Botulinum Toxin Effect on Spasticity: Rationale,Systematic Review and State of the Art

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) represents a first-line treatment for spasticity, a common disabling consequence of many neurological diseases. Electrical stimulation of motor nerve endings has been reported to boost the effect of BoNT-A. To date, a wide range of stimulation protocols has been proposed in the literature. We conducted a systematic review of current literature on the protocols of electrical stimulation to boost the effect of BoNT-A injection in patients with spasticity. A systematic search using the MeSH terms “electric stimulation”, “muscle spasticity” and “botulinum toxins” and strings “electric stimulation [mh] OR electrical stimulation AND muscle spasticity [mh] OR spasticity AND botulinum toxins [mh] OR botulinum toxin type A” was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, PEDro and Cochrane library electronic databases. Full-text articles written in English and published from database inception to March 2021 were included. Data on patient characteristics, electrical stimulation protocols and outcome measures were collected. This systematic review provides a complete overview of current literature on the role of electrical stimulation to boost the effect of BoNT-A injection for spasticity, together with a critical discussion on its rationale based on the neurobiology of BoNT-A uptake.     

An Observational Cross-Sectional Study of Gender and Disability as Determinants of Person-Centered Medicine in Botulinum Neurotoxin Treatment of Upper Motoneuron Syndrome

The motor behaviour of patients with Upper Motor Neuron Syndrome (UMNS) is characterised by spasticity. The first-line treatment for this clinical condition is Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNTA), but the number and key locations of muscles which need to be treated is not much discussed in the literature. Cross-sectional analysis of outpatient cohort with UMNS spasticity, who were potential candidates for BoNTA treatment, was performed. Between November 2020 and November 2021, all consecutive adult patients eligible for BoNTA treatment were enrolled. The inclusion criteria encompass UMNS spasticity (onset being ≥6 months), with disabling muscles hypertonia. Patients underwent a clinical evaluation, a comprehensive assessment with the Modified Ashworth Scale, with the Modified Rankin Scale, and a patients’ perception-centred questionnaire. In total, 68 participants were enrolled in the study, among them 40 (58.8%) were male; mean age 57.9 ± 15.1. In women, BoNTA was more frequently required for adductor group muscles, independently from potential confounders (OR = 7.03, 95%CI: 1.90–25.97). According to the pattern of disability, patients with hemiparesis more frequently need to be treated in the upper limb, whereas the diplegia/double-hemiparesis group needed to be treated more frequently at the adductor and crux muscles compared to their counterparts. UMNS spasticity in women could require more attention to be paid to the treatment of adductor muscle spasticity, potentially because the dysfunction of those muscles could influence sphincteric management, required for perineal hygiene and/or sexual life.     

Botulinum toxin B: a review of its therapeutic potential in the management of cervical dystonia

Botulinum toxins are well known as the causative agents of human botulism food poisoning. However, in the past two decades they have become an important therapeutic mainstay in the treatment of dystonias including cervical dystonia, a neurological disorder characterised by involuntary contractions of the cervical and/or shoulder muscles. The toxins inhibit acetylcholine release from neuromuscular junctions, producing muscle weakness when injected into dystonic muscles. Data from three double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials demonstrate that botulinum toxin B effectively reduces the severity, disability and pain of cervical dystonia. In two of the trials, mean Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total score at week 4 (primary efficacy measure) after botulinum toxin B 10 000U was reduced by 11.7 (25%) or 11 (21%) compared with baseline. These changes were significantly greater than those obtained with placebo [4.3 (10%) or 2 (4%)] and were generally similar in patients who were responsive or resistant to botulinum toxin A. Statistically significant benefits compared with placebo were also evident for a range of other efficacy parameters including TWSTRS-Severity, -Pain and -Disability subscales, patient- assessed pain and patient-/physician-assessed global improvement ratings. In another trial, the percentage of patients with botulinum toxin A-resistant or -responsive cervical dystonia who had a > or =20% improvement in the TWSTRS-Total score between baseline and week 4 was significantly higher with botulinum toxin B 2500 to 10 000U (58 to 77%) than with placebo (27%). Overall, botulinum toxin B was generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were dry mouth and dysphagia. Most adverse events in patients receiving botulinum toxin B were mild or moderate; no serious adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were associated with the use of botulinum toxin B and, where reported, no patients discontinued from any of the clinical trials as a result of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin B has shown clinical efficacy in patients with cervical dystonia at doses up to 10 000U and is generally well tolerated. Its efficacy extends to patients who are resistant to botulinum toxin A. Although the potential for secondary resistance to botulinum toxin B remains unclear, it may occur less than with botulinum toxin A because methods for manufacturing commercially available botulinum toxin B do not include lyophilisation and the product does not require reconstitution before use. As injection with botulinum toxin is generally considered the treatment of choice for patients with cervical dystonia, botulinum toxin B should be considered a potential treatment option in this setting.     

Early Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Early management of spasticity may improve stroke outcome. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is recommended treatment for post-stroke spasticity (PSS). However, it is usually administered in the chronic phase of stroke. Our aim was to determine whether the length of time between stroke onset and initial BoNT-A injection has an effect on outcomes after PSS treatment. This multicenter, longitudinal, cohort study included stroke patients (time since onset <12 months) with PSS who received BoNT-A for the first time according to routine practice. The main outcome was the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). Patients were evaluated before BoNT-A injection and then at 4, 12, and 24 weeks of follow-up. Eighty-three patients with PSS were enrolled. MAS showed a significant decrease in PSS at 4 and 12 weeks but not at 24 weeks after treatment. Among the patients with a time between stroke onset and BoNT-A injection >90 days, the MAS were higher at 4 and 12 weeks than at 24 weeks compared to those injected ≤90 days since stroke. Our findings suggest that BoNT-A treatment for PSS should be initiated within 3 months after stroke onset in order to obtain a greater reduction in muscle tone at 1 and 3 months afterwards.     

Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the BCause Study Assessing the Effect of AbobotulinumtoxinA on Post-Stroke Shoulder Pain in Adults

AbstractBotulinum toxin type A is approved for the focal treatment of spasticity; however, the effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) in patients with shoulder pain who have set reduced pain as a treatment goal is understudied. In addition, some patients encounter delays in accessing treatment programs; therefore, the suitability of aboBoNT-A for pain reduction in this population requires investigation. These factors were assessed in aboBoNT-A-naive Brazilian patients in a post hoc analysis of data from BCause, an observational, multicenter, prospective study ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02390206","term_id":"NCT02390206"}}NCT02390206). Patients (N = 49, n = 25 female; mean (standard deviation) age of 60.3 (9.1) years; median (range) time since onset of spasticity of 16.1 (0–193) months) received aboBoNT-A injections to shoulder muscles in one or two treatment cycles (n = 47). Using goal attainment scaling (GAS), most patients achieved their goal of shoulder pain reduction after one treatment cycle (72.1%; 95% confidence interval: 57.2–83.4%). Improvements in GAS T-score from baseline, clinically meaningful reductions in pain score at movement, and clinically meaningful increases in passive shoulder abduction angle further improved with repeated treatment more than 4 months later, despite treatment starting at a median of 16.1 months after the onset of spasticity. These findings support the further investigation of aboBoNT-A injections in chronic post-stroke shoulder pain.Plain Language SummaryAfter a stroke, patients often experience shoulder pain, which can lead to difficulty with arm movement and interfere with their rehabilitation. Some patients also experience difficulty or delays in receiving treatment. Botulinum toxin injections can be used to improve muscle pain and function. The BCause trial looked at how one or two doses of a specific type of botulinum toxin injection, called abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A), into shoulder muscles could help patients with shoulder pain following a stroke. This analysis of the BCause trial included 49 Brazilian patients aged 18–80 years who had suffered a stroke in the previous year and who set reduced shoulder pain as a goal of their treatment. They had not previously received any botulinum toxin injections. The researchers looked at how helpful the injections were by using a scale that measured how well each patient achieved their treatment goal. Additionally, researchers measured pain levels, muscle tone, range of shoulder movement, and quality of life before and after treatment. The results showed that aboBoNT-A injections helped most patients to reach their goal of reduced shoulder pain. Patients receiving repeated aboBoNT-A injections experienced further improvements in how much they could move their shoulder after more than 4 months compared with at the start of the study. Patients’ and caregivers’ quality of life was also improved after treatment compared with before. The researchers considered these results to be clinically meaningful—that is, the improvements with aboBoNT-A were likely to provide a real benefit for patients, caregivers, and clinicians.     

Botulinum Toxin Therapy for Spasmodic Dysphonia in Japan: The History and an Update

Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a rare neurological disorder that impairs phonatory function by triggering involuntary and intermittent contractions of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles. SD is classified into three types: adductor SD (AdSD), abductor SD (AbSD), and mixed SD. Of these, AdSD accounts for 90–95% of disease; younger females are predominantly affected. Botulinum toxin injection into the laryngeal muscles is safe, minimally invasive, and very effective. Here, we review the history of clinical research for SD conducted in Japan. The first use of botulinum toxin injection therapy to treat SD in Japan was by Kobayashi et al. in 1989. The group developed an objective mora (syllable) method to evaluate SD severity. Recently, we conducted a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial of botulinum toxin therapy for AdSD and an open-label trial for AbSD to obtain the approval of such therapy by the Japanese medical insurance system. The mora method revealed significant voice improvement and the evidence was of high quality. Additionally, a clinical trial of type 2 thyroplasty using titanium bridges confirmed the efficacy and safety of such therapy. These studies broadened the SD treatment options and have significantly benefited patients.     

Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Upper Limb Spasticity Due to Stroke with Botulinum Toxin Type A: Results from the Botulinum Toxin for the Upper Limb after Stroke (BoTULS) Trial

Stroke imposes significant burdens on health services and society, and as such there is a growing need to assess the cost-effectiveness of stroke treatment to ensure maximum benefit is derived from limited resources. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of treating post-stroke upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin type A plus an upper limb therapy programme against the therapy programme alone. Data on resource use and health outcomes were prospectively collected for 333 patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity taking part in a randomized trial and combined to estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy relative to therapy alone. The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy was £93,500 per QALY gained. The probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the England and Wales cost-effectiveness threshold value of £20,000 per QALY was 0.36. The point estimates of the ICER remained above £20,000 per QALY for a range of sensitivity analyses, and the probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the threshold value did not exceed 0.39, regardless of the assumptions made.     

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Botulinum Toxin Treatment Combined with Robot-Assisted Therapy,Mirror Therapy,or Active Control Treatment in Patients with Spasticity Following Stroke

Effects of the combined task-oriented trainings with botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection on improving motor functions and reducing spasticity remains unclear. This study aims to investigate effects of 3 task-oriented trainings (robot-assisted therapy (RT), mirror therapy (MT), and active control treatment (AC)) in patients with stroke after BoNT-A injection. Thirty-seven patients with chronic spastic hemiplegic stroke were randomly assigned to receive RT, MT, or AC following BoNT-A injection over spastic upper extremity muscles. Each session of RT, MT, and AC was 75 min, 3 times weekly, for 8 weeks. Outcome measures were assessed at pretreatment, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up, involving the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Motor Activity Log (MAL), including amount of use (AOU) and quality of movement (QOM), and arm activity level. All 3 combined treatments improved FMA, MAS, and MAL. The AC induced a greater effect on QOM in MAL at the 3-month follow-up than RT or MT. All 3 combined trainings induced minimal effect on arm activity level. Our findings suggest that for patients with stroke who received BoNT-A injection over spastic UE muscles, the RT, MT, or AC UE training that followed was effective in improving motor functions, reducing spasticity, and enhancing daily function.     

Treatment with botulinum toxin of octo-nonagerians with oesophageal achalasia: a two-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Treatment of oesophageal achalasia with intrasphincteric injections of botulinum toxin has proved to be a successful alternative treatment modality. However, little is known about its long-term effects in very old patients. AIM: To evaluate the effects of such treatment in octo-nonagerians during a 2-year follow-up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with idiopathic oesophageal achalasia (range 81-94 years) entered the study. After basal evaluation and screening procedures, 100 U of botulinum toxin was injected at the lower oesophageal sphincter, and the procedure was repeated 1 month later. Data were collected at baseline and were compared after 1 and 2 years following the procedure. RESULTS: Seventy-eight per cent of patients were considered responders at 1 year and 54% were considered responders at 2 years. The weight gain at the end of the follow-up period was 2 (0-3) kg. No significant relationship was found between baseline lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and symptoms score after 1 and 2 years of follow-up; moreover, no major complications of botulinum toxin therapy were reported. CONCLUSION: Treatment of very old achalasic patients with botulinum toxin is safe, effective and yields good quality of life in a substantial proportion of these subjects.     

Ocular surface changes following botulinum toxin injection for strabismus

Context: Botulinum toxin injection is widely used for many purposes, including neuromuscular diseases, movement disorders and strabismus.

Objective: To evaluate and report the impact of botulinum toxin injection on ocular surface parameters in patients with strabismus.

Participants: Twenty-six consecutive patients who underwent botulinum toxin A injection for ocular misalignment were recruited for this prospective study.

Materials and methods: Testing of ocular surface parameters including tear break-up time (BUT), lissamine green (LG) staining and Schirmer test (under topical anesthesia) was performed, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire scores were recorded before and at certain time points after injection (one week, two weeks, one month, three months and six months after botulinum toxin A injection). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures, Friedman’s test and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Twenty six patients (15 eso- and 11 exo-deviations) with a mean age of 32.46?±?14.41 (17–65) years were recruited for the study. All injections were performed in one eye. The mean amount of deviation at near and distance reduced after injection. The change of BUT, LG staining and OSDI scores was found to be significant during follow-up in treated eyes (p?=?0.001, p?=?0.007 and p?=?0.009, respectively) whereas the change was insignificant for the Schirmer test results (p?=?0.266).

Conclusions: The ocular surface parameters appear to be altered by botulinum toxin injection in strabismic patients. Even though these effects seemed to be temporary, the findings of the present study support the notion of botulinum toxin effects on ocular surface parameters.