Bromocriptine does not alter growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone in acromegaly

GHRH (100 micrograms) and TRH (200 micrograms) were administered to 24 active acromegalic patients before and during chronic bromocriptine (Br) treatment (Br, 10-15 mg/day for 3-5 months) to evaluate the possible effects of the dopamine agonist on GH release induced by these releasing hormones. Mean daily plasma GH levels were reduced by Br treatment from 34 +/- 40 (SD) to 16 +/- 19 ng/ml (P less than 0.01). No significant changes were found when comparing the GH response to GHRH as mean area under the response curve (nanograms per min/ml above the basal) (pretreatment, 5453 +/- 7843; during Br, 7017 +/- 12763 ng/ml . min), and as mean individual peak GH values (pretreatment, 130 +/- 148; during Br, 126 +/- 187 ng/ml) before and during treatment. The percentage GH increase (pretreatment, 340 +/- 354; during Br, 617 +/- 539%) was however significantly higher during Br. Br treatment significantly reduced the GH response to TRH in terms of mean of individual peak levels (from 136 +/- 134 to 60 +/- 52 ng/ml; P less than 0.01) and area under the response curve (from 3142 +/- 3998 to 1331 +/- 1646 ng/min . ml; P less than 0.01). However, the percentage GH increase was not significantly different (pretreatment, 486 +/- 729; during Br, 1059 +/- 1862%). When the patients were divided into Br responders, i.e. mean daily GH reduction during Br of at least 50% below baseline, and nonresponders, the initial response to GHRH was significantly higher in the latter group, but was unaffected by Br treatment in either group. On the contrary, the response to TRH, statistically significant initially only in the Br responder group, was reduced by Br treatment. We suggest that cells sensitive to Br and TRH but not to GHRH (lactotroph-like) and cells sensitive to GHRH but not to Br (pure somatotrophs) may coexist in GH-secreting adenomas.     

Bromocriptine treatment over 12 years in acromegaly: effect on growth hormone and prolactin secretion.

It is not known whether bromocriptine treatment in acromegaly can be implemented for a life-long period. To elucidate this problem, the secretory GH and PRL states of 12 patients with acromegaly were determined, before bromocriptine treatment, under therapy (15.0 +/- 6.8 mg/day for 12 +/- 3 years; mean +/- SD) and during two-weeks long drug withdrawal after long-term treatment, respectively. Before therapy, all patients showed a non-sufficient GH suppression after oral glucose load (greater than 2 micrograms/l), whereas under dopaminergic treatment the post-glucose GH levels of three patients fell below 2 micrograms/l; normal IGF-I concentrations were found in five patients. However, under bromocriptine, only two patients showed GH suppressions below 2 micrograms/l following glucose, accompanied with normal IGF-I levels. During bromocriptine withdrawal, GH secretion at 60 min in the oral glucose tolerance test increased significantly (17.0 +/- 15.5 vs 5.7 +/- 5.2 micrograms/l; p less than 0.01); the mean IGF-I level rose from 2.1 +/- 0.8 to 4.9 +/- 2.2 kU/l (p less than 0.01). IGF-I was normal during bromocriptine cessation in only one patient; none of the 12 patients showed a GH suppression below 2 micrograms/l after oral glucose load. Under dopaminergic treatment hyperprolactinemia could not be detected. In conclusion, bromocriptine led to a stable suppression of both GH hypersecretion and--if present--concomitantly elevated PRL levels. Severe side effects or a further tumor growth could not be observed. Thus, the data of the longest follow-up investigation that has so far been published indicate that effective life-long bromocriptine therapy seems to be possible in selected patients with acromegaly.     

Bromocriptine treatment of acromegaly

Bromocriptine at a dose of 7.5-30 mg/day was given to 12 acromegalics for 6 mo. Mean serum growth hormone (GH) levels during a glucose tolerance test (GTT) were significantly lowered by the drug. In four patients the serum GH response during a GTT was suppressed to normal (i.e. less than or equal to 5 mlU/liter). If bromocriptine had not brought the serum GH response to a GTT to normal at a dose of 20 mg/day, this effect was not achieved by raising the dose to 30 mg/day. Bromocriptine was effective for the duration of treatment. On discontinuing therapy there was an increase in serum GH levels. No obvious clinical changes in the acromegalic features were noted. One patient with impaired glucose tolerance and one with established diabetes had normal glucose tolerance while on bromocriptine and another two patients with impaired glucose tolerance showed no obvious changes while on the drug. Side effects were minor. X-rays of the pituitary fossa before starting and at the end of treatment showed no significant change. We conclude that although bromocriptine is the most promising form of medical treatment for acromegaly to date, it is fully effective only in a minority of patients.     

Increased growth hormone pulse frequency in acromegaly

To investigate whether GH secretion in acromegaly is subject to regulatory control by the hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) we studied GH secretion in 22 patients with acromegaly. Parameters of pulsatile GH secretion were assessed using frequent blood sampling (every 20 or 10 min for 24 h). Acute GH responses to GHRH-44 (0.1, 0.33, and 1.0 micrograms/kg BW, iv) were measured, and GH secretion during therapy with the long-acting somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 (Sandoz) was assessed. The results were compared to those in normal volunteers. Spontaneous GH pulse frequency was greater in patients with acromegaly than in 6 control subjects (8.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.3 +/- 1.1 pulses/24 h), as estimated by the 20-min sampling frequency. The 10-min sampling frequency revealed 12.9 +/- 0.7 pulses/24 h in acromegalics. Spontaneous GH pulse amplitude and acute GH rises in response to GHRH did not differ between control and acromegalic subjects. A similar degree of nocturnal augmentation of GH secretion was observed in both groups, and it persisted during SMS 201-995 therapy in patients with acromegaly. These observations suggest that GH secretion in acromegaly remains under stimulatory control by GHRH, which may be released at an abnormally high rate.     

Bromocriptine reduces cigarette smoking

Aims. Animal studies have shown that nicotine releases dopamine, a neurotransmitter implicated in drug reinforcement. We hypothesized that bromocriptine would decrease smoking behavior in humans. Design. The study was conducted double blind and subjects' order of dose exposure was randomized. Participants. The smoking behavior of 20 heavy smokers was recorded for 5 hours after ingesting placebo or one of two doses of bromocriptine (2.50 mg, 3.75 mg) over three sessions (one dose per session). Findings. There was a significant negative linear trend by dosage indicating shorter total puffing time with increasing bromocriptine dosages ( p < 0.02). Other significant negative linear trends by increasing dosage include fewer number of puffs, fewer number of cigarettes smoked and mean latency to smoke after 3 hours (expected C _MAX on the drug (all p s < 0.05). There was a negative significant linear trend showing decreased plasma nicotine ( p < 0.02) and cotinine ( p < 0.005) with increasing dosages of bromocriptine. Shiffman/Jarvik Withdrawal Scale (SJWS) cigarette craving subscale scores decreased significantly across increasing dosages (linear trend p < 0.02). There was a significant negative linear trend ( p < 0.05) on the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Vigor and Depression subscales, with subjects reporting decreased vigor and depression with increasing bromocriptine doses. No other mood effects were observed. Conclusion. These results support the hypothesis that dopaminergic mechanisms mediate cigarette smoking reinforcement.     

Effects of growth hormone-releasing factor on growth hormone secretion in acromegaly

Twenty-nine patients with acromegaly (8 untreated and 21 previously treated in various ways) and 16 normal men were given iv bolus doses of human pancreatic tumor GH-releasing factor (hpGRF-40). Twenty-five of the 29 patients responded to hpGRF-40 with elevations of plasma GH. The magnitude of the responses varied widely. Responses of untreated patients were generally similar to those of the normal subjects. Previously treated patients had a significantly lower response than normal individuals [change in GH, 7.5 +/- 1.8 vs. 42.0 +/- 11.0 ng/ml (mean +/- SEM); P less than 0.01], and 4 patients who had received radiation therapy failed to respond to hpGRF-40. There was no significant correlation between the magnitude of the response and patients' age, sex, baseline GH levels, GH responsiveness of TRH, or GH suppression after oral glucose administration. Patients studied both pre- and postoperatively were responsive to hpGRF-40 at all times tested, but the magnitude of the response decreased after successful surgical removal of the adenoma. Thus, most patients with treated or untreated acromegaly respond to hpGRF-40, but their responses do not clearly distinguish them from normal subjects. GH-releasing hormone testing is unlikely to replace other endocrine tests available for the diagnosis and evaluation of acromegaly.     

Galanin decreases circulating growth hormone levels in acromegaly.

Galanin is able to elicit GH secretion in normal man. In acromegaly, circulating GH levels are elevated, and GH secretory dynamics are usually abnormal. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of galanin on GH secretion in acromegalic subjects. Six acromegalic patients (four males and two females) and seven healthy adult subjects (five males and two females) underwent in randomized order: 1) iv infusion of 100 mL saline from 0-45 min, and 2) iv infusion of synthetic porcine galanin (0.5 mg in 100 mL saline) from 0-45 min. In normal subjects, peak GH levels after porcine galanin administration (8.2 +/- 1.9 micrograms/L) were significantly higher than after saline infusion (1.3 +/- 0.1 micrograms/L; P less than 0.05). In acromegalic patients, GH values fell from baseline (32.5 +/- 12 micrograms/L) to a mean nadir of 24.5 +/- 12.7 micrograms/L after galanin infusion. The mean change in GH values from baseline after galanin treatment in these subjects significantly differed from that observed after saline infusion from 15-90 min. Serum PRL levels were not significantly affected by galanin in either normal or acromegalic patients. Our results give the first evidence that the same dose of galanin, acting as a GH secretagogue in normal man, is, on the contrary, able to significantly inhibit GH in acromegalic patients. The cause of this paradoxical GH fall after galanin treatment in acromegaly remains to be explained. It can be hypothesized that galanin may interact at the pituitary level with its own receptors expressed by GH-secreting adenomatous cells.     

The role of endogenous growth hormone-releasing hormone in acromegaly

CONTEXT: Some indirect evidence suggests hypothalamic control of GH secretion in acromegaly. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to examine whether GH secretion in acromegaly is dependent on endogenous GHRH. PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: We studied eight patients with untreated acromegaly due to a GH-producing pituitary tumor. All patients received an iv infusion of normal saline for 24 h and GHRH-antagonist (GHRH-ant) at 50 microg/kg x h for 7 d. GH was measured every 10 min for 24 h during the normal saline infusion and on the last day of the GHRH-ant infusion. A group of nine different patients with untreated acromegaly served as the control group and underwent blood sampling for GH every 10 min for two 24-h periods to assess the day-to-day variability of GH secretion. SETTING: The study was set in a university referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Twenty-four-hour mean GH was the main outcome measured. RESULTS: In six of eight subjects treated with GHRH-ant, 24-h mean GH decreased by 5.8-30.0% during iv GHRH-ant and, in three subjects, the change in the 24-h mean GH was greater than the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the spontaneous day-to-day variability of the mean GH in patients with acromegaly. Based on the binomial distribution, the probability of this magnitude of change to occur in three of eight subjects by chance alone is 0.0008. CONCLUSION: In some patients with acromegaly due to a pituitary adenoma, GH secretion is under partial control by endogenous GHRH.     

Absent growth hormone response to L-tryptophan in acromegaly.

In acromegaly, regulation of GH secretion by dopamine pathways appears to be qualitatively abnormal. To determine whether regulation of GH secretion by serotonin pathways is also abnormal in acromegaly, we administered L-tryptophan (5 g orally), the initial precursor of serotonin, to 10 patients with active acromegaly (9 treated and 1 untreated), 3 patients with cured acromegaly, and 8 normal subjects. The normal group showed a significant (P less than 0.05) increase in serum GH after L-tryptophan [peak value, 12.3 +/- 4.0 (se) ng/ml], though the magnitude of the response was highly variable. In contrast, subjects with active acromegaly did not show an increase in serum GH after L-tryptophan [mean integrated percentage change in serum GH, -25 +/- 25% (SE); P = NS]. One patient whose acromegaly had been surgically cured did show a GH rise after L-tryptophan. In acromegaly, the GH response to L-tryptophan is absent, suggesting that regulation of GH secretion by serotonin pathways might be qualitatively abnormal.     

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide induced growth hormone secretion in acromegaly

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), a peptide released from the intestines after meals, is thought to stimulate insulin secretion. GIP receptor cDNA has recently been cloned and its mRNA has been recognized in several organs including the pituitary, but the physiological roles of GIP receptors of the pituitary have yet to be determined. We have demonstrated the possibility that GIP stimulates GH secretions from the pituitary adenoma cells of acromegalics. GIP-stimulated GH responses were studied in four acromegalics. In two acromegalics whose GH showed paradoxical secretion to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), GIP infusion (0.6 microg/kg/h) drove GH secretion (13.7 to 68.1, 22.5 to 76.2 ng/ml, respectively). However, in the other two acromegalics whose GH showed no paradoxical response to OGTT, GIP infusion did not induce GH secretion. One of the patients who was studied extensively had a GH that responded to OGTT. This patient's serum GH levels increased after meals while adenomectomy abolished both the paradoxical GH secretions by OGTT and GH responses to the GIP infusion. These data suggested that some somatotroph adenoma cells have an aberrant response to GIP which may go toward explaining paradoxical GH secretions to OGTT in acromegalics.     

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone increases serum levels of growth hormone-releasing hormone and growth hormone in patients with acromegaly.

The effect of intravenous injection of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) on the plasma concentrations of growth hormone (GH) and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) was studied in seven patients with acromegaly and in five control subjects. TRH had no effect on plasma GH or GHRH in the five control subjects. A 'paradoxical' increase in plasma GH in response to TRH was observed in four of the seven patients with acromegaly. In these four patients plasma GHRH also increased in response to TRH. No TRH-induced increase in GHRH levels was observed in the other three patients with acromegaly who did not display an increase in GH in response to TRH. The present results imply that GHRH may be involved in the plasma GH response to TRH in patients with acromegaly.     

Effect of dexamethasone on growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone releasing hormone in acromegaly

The effect of dexamethasone on the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) was studied in vivo in six patients with acromegaly as well as in vitro in monolayer cultures of GH-secreting pituitary tumor cells obtained from three of these patients. Oral administration of 9 mg/day dexamethasone for 2 days decreased plasma GH responses to iv injection of 100 micrograms GHRH-(1-44 amide) in all six patients. Blood glucose levels were significantly increased, while plasma somatomedin-C levels were significantly decreased by this regimen of dexamethasone treatment. On the other hand, 2-day pretreatment with 50 nM dexamethasone of monolayer cultures of pituitary adenoma cells potentiated GH release basally and/or in response to 100 pM to 1 nM GHRH in vitro. These results indicate that the potentiating action of 2-day treatment of dexamethasone in vitro is overwhelmed in vivo by some extra-pituitary action, probably on the central nervous system, of glucocorticoids in patients with acromegaly.     

Effect of galanin on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in acromegaly.

Galanin enhances growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in normal man. In acromegaly, circulating GH levels are increased and the GH response to GHRH may be exaggerated. Galanin has been recently shown to decrease circulating GH levels in acromegaly. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of galanin on the GH response to GHRH in acromegalic subjects. Five acromegalic patients (three men and two women) and seven healthy adult subjects (five men and two women) were studied. GHRH-induced GH secretion was evaluated during a 40-minute intravenous (IV) infusion of saline (100 mL) or porcine galanin (12.5 micrograms/min in 100 mL saline). In normal subjects, delta GH levels after GHRH+porcine galanin administration (47 +/- 7.5 micrograms/L) were significantly higher in comparison to levels obtained with GHRH+saline (21.7 +/- 3.5 micrograms/L, P < .05). In acromegalic patients, GH responses to GHRH (delta GH, 18.8 +/- 8.6 micrograms/L) were not altered by galanin infusion (delta GH, 17.6 +/- 5 micrograms/L). Our results give the first evidence that the same dose of galanin that induces a significant enhancement of the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects has no effect on the GH response to GHRH in acromegalic patients. It can be hypothesized that galanin may interact at the pituitary level with its own receptors expressed by somatotropes independent of GHRH. Failure of galanin to enhance GH response to GHRH in acromegalic patients could be due to a change in function of the galanin receptor on GH-secreting adenomatous cells.     

Quantification of day-to-day variability in growth hormone levels in acromegaly

Growth hormone (GH) measurements are routinely used for important treatment decisions in patients with acromegaly, yet their reliability is affected by numerous factors including assay precision and variability, sampling intensity, and hormone pulsatility. The day-to-day variation in GH in acromegaly has not been studied. This study quantified the magnitude of day-to-day GH variability in patients with acromegaly by performing an analysis of previously obtained plasma GH profiles. The analysis was performed at the Michigan Clinical Research Unit at the University of Michigan. A total of nine 48 h Q10 min GH profiles obtained in nine patients with active acromegaly were examined. The study was planned after data collection and analysis was conducted using Altman–Bland methods. Day 1 vs. Day 2 values were examined. 95% confidence intervals of the D2 vs. D1 ratios were calculated on all individual subject data as well as on a single 0800 h GH sample and composite mean data for 2-, 5-, 9-, and 24-h sampling protocols. Confidence interval range was 0.66–1.50 for the 0800 h sample and was similar for all sampling protocols except somewhat more narrow for the 24-h sampling (0.75–1.32). Daily variations in GH levels introduce an additional confounding element when using a single GH level or even daily GH curves to assess a patient’s GH milieu. It may have an impact on result interpretation and subsequent treatment decisions especially when GH results are considered borderline.