Robotic Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis of Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer

Both linear-stapled side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis (LSEA) and circular-stapled end-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis (CEEA) are frequently used following esophagectomy. The aims of the present study were to review our experience of robotic intrathoracic alimentary tract reconstruction and to compare the short-term surgical outcomes of LSEA and CEEA in robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A prospectively collected dataset from 79 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy from February 2016 to December 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Two groups (LSEA and CEEA) were classified according to the anastomotic mode. Demographic data, intraoperative characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Two patients were converted to laparotomy. The remaining 77 patients (68 males and 9 females, mean age of 61.7 years) were successfully treated with completely robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. According to the anastomotic procedure performed, 35 patients were categorized into the LSEA group and 42 patients were categorized into the CEEA group. The mean anastomotic time in the LSEA group was longer than that in the CEEA group (63.0 ± 9.0 vs. 44.2 ± 8.5 min, p < 0.001). No significant difference was detected in anastomotic complications, including leakage (8.6% with LSEA and 4.8% with CEEA, p = 0.83) and postoperative dysphagia (5.7% with LSEA and 16.7% with CEEA, p = 0.26). No statistical difference was observed for the other surgical outcomes. There was no incidence of in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality in both groups. In robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, both LSEA and CEEA were feasible and safe to be performed and surgeons can select either LSEA or CEEA based on their own technical expertise.     

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic outcomes and long-term survival

The study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes and long-term survival of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) for patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Substantial evidence demonstrated that LPD is technically safe and feasible with perioperative outcomes equivalent to that of OPD. However, for patients with malignancy, especially PDAC, the oncologic outcomes and long-term survival of patients who underwent LPD remains to be elucidated. Studies on LPD for the treatment of PDAC published before December 25, 2018 were searched online. The oncologic outcomes (e.g., numbers of lymph nodes retrieved, negative margin (R0) resection), and long-term survival (postoperative survival from 1 to 5 year) of LPD were compared to that of ODP. After screening 1507 studies, six comparative cohort studies, which reported the oncologic outcomes and long-term survival of patients with PDAC were included. No significant difference was found between LPD and OPD regarding lymph nodes harvested (OR 1.96, 95% CI − 1.17 to 5.09, p = 0.22), R0 rate (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.06, p = 0.05), number of positive lymph nodes (OR − 0.44, 95% CI − 1.06 to 0.17, p = 0.16), rate of adjuvant treatment (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.59, p = 0.86) and time to adjuvant treatment (OR − 6.21, 95% CI − 16.00 to 3.59, p = 0.21). LPD showed similar 1-year (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.65, p = 0.28), and 2-year survival (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.66, p = 0.13) to that of OPD. The 3-year (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.02, p = 0.007), 4-year (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.93, p = 0.04), and 5-year survival (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.31, p = 0.001) were significantly longer in LPD group. For the treatment of PDAC, the oncologic outcomes of LPD were equivalent to that of OPD; LPD seemed promising regarding the postoperative long-term survival.     

Laparoscopic Colonic Resection for Rectosigmoid Colonic Tumours: A Retrospective Analysis and Comparison with Open Resection

Laparoscopic approach for treatment of colorectal malignancy is gaining acceptance gradually; however the benefits of laparoscopic surgery in colonic and rectal tumours is still open to debate. This study aims at a retrospective analysis of operative and short term outcome of patients with rectosigmoid tumours. A retrospective analysis of operative, postoperative and short-term outcome of 62 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer of rectosigmoid region were compared with a same number of parameters-matched patients who underwent open colorectal resection. Blood transfusion requirement was significantly more in the open group compared to the laparoscopy group (38.7% versus 6.4%, p = 0.001). ICU stay was less in the laparoscopy group (p = <0.05) and they were started on oral liquid diet earlier (p = 0.013). The number of the lymph nodes retrieved, positive distal margin and radial involvement were similar in both groups. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in laparoscopy group (8.4 versus 13.8 days, p < 0.05). Radical operation for rectosigmoid tumors is technically feasible with laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic approach is associated with less blood loss, transfusion and significantly less ICU stay. Laparoscopic group recovers early and needs less hospital stay     

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations

A history of abdominal biliary tract surgery has been identified as a relative contraindication for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), and there are very few reports about laparoscopic procedures in patients with a history of abdominal biliary tract surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 227 consecutive patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations at our institution between December 2013 and June 2019. A total of 110 consecutive patients underwent LCBDE, and 117 consecutive patients underwent open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE). Patient demographics and perioperative variables were compared between the two groups. The LCBDE group performed significantly better than the OCBDE group with respect to estimated blood loss [30 (5–700) vs. 50 (10–1800) ml; p = 0.041], remnant common bile duct (CBD) stones (17 vs. 28%; p = 0.050), postoperative hospital stay [7 (3–78) vs. 8.5 (4.5–74) days; p = 0.041], and time to oral intake [2.5 (1–7) vs. 3 (2–24) days; p = 0.015]. There were no significant differences in the operation time [170 (60–480) vs. 180 (41–330) minutes; p = 0.067]. A total of 19 patients (17%) in the LCBDE group were converted to open surgery. According to Clavien’s classification of complications, the LCBDE group had significantly fewer postoperative complications than the OCBDE group (40 vs. 57; p = 0.045). There was no mortality in either group. Multiple previous operations (≥ 2 times), a history of open surgery, and previous biliary tract surgery (including bile duct or gallbladder + bile duct other than cholecystectomy alone) were risk factors for postoperative adhesion (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000, respectively). LCBDE is ultimately the least invasive, safest, and the most effective treatment option for patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations and is especially suitable for those with a history of cholecystectomy, few previous operations (< 2 times), or a history of laparoscopic surgery.     

A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences

The purpose of this study was to compare anatomic and perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) and abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC). The hypothesis is that the laparoscopic technique has similar anatomic outcomes as compared with the open technique. A retrospective comparative chart review was conducted consisting of 43 patients who underwent laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and 41 patients who underwent abdominal sacral colpopexy. Demographics were comparable between groups except mean follow-up time (LSC = 7.4 months, ASC = 10.6 months). Mean improvement at the apex was similar between the two groups. Hospital stay in hours was shorter for the LSC group (mean/median = 35.4/30.9) than the ASC group (mean/median = 63.3/54.1, p < 0.001). Mean operative time was similar (LSC = 183, ASC = 168 min, p = NS) and complication rates were comparable between the groups. Patients undergoing laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy have comparable anatomical outcomes and operative times. Laparoscopy affords a shorter hospital stay.     

Laparoscopic vs. Open Resection of Noninvasive Intraductal Pancreatic Mucinous Neoplasms

Required resection margins for noninvasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are a controversial issue. Over a 10-year period we have resected IPMNs from the entire pancreatic gland with minimally invasive techniques and compared our survival and complication rates with open controls to see if any difference in resection margins and outcomes could be observed. Data were collected retrospectively, including our first cases of advanced laparoscopic resections. Five-year Kaplan–Meier curves were calculated and statistical analysis was performed using the log rank and Student’s T test for continuous variables. Chi square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for analyzing categorical variables. From March 1997 to Febuary 2006, we operated on 22 patients with noninvasive IPMNs, of which 9 (41%) were operated on laparoscopically and 13 (59%) using open techniques. Three patients underwent laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy, compared to five in the open group. All resection margins were negative, but two patients required total pancreatectomy, both of which were performed laparoscopically. One of these was converted to open (11%) because of difficulty in reconstructing the biliary anastomosis. The overall complication rates were 56% for the laparoscopic group and 85% for the open group. Twenty-two percent of the laparoscopic group required reoperation and 11% required percutaneous drainage, compared to 15 and 23% in the open group, respectively. All patients are alive after a mean of 20 months (range = 2–43) in the laparoscopic group and 37 months (range = 1–121) in the open one (p > 0.05). Laparoscopic resection of noninvasive IPMNs of the entire pancreatic gland has similar complication and survival rates as open procedures. As a result, the laparoscopic approach is appropriate for noninvasive IPMNs of the entire pancreatic gland; however, larger cohorts are needed to see if any approach has superior outcomes. Because of these favorable results, studies are currently underway to see if the minimally invasive approach is also appropriate for invasive IPMNs.     

Preoperative change of modified Glasgow prognostic score after stenting predicts the long-term outcomes of obstructive colorectal cancer

Inflammation-based markers predict the long-term outcomes of various malignancies. We investigated the relationship between the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and the long-term outcomes of obstructive colorectal cancer in patients who underwent self-expandable metallic colonic stent placement and subsequently received curative surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 63 consecutive patients with pathological stage II and III obstructive colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2018. The mGPS was calculated before stenting and surgery, and the difference of the scores was defined as the d-mGPS. All d-mGPS = 2 patients were > 70 years of age (p = 0.01). Postoperative complications were more common in the preoperative mGPS = 2 group (p = 0.02). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the mGPS = 2 group (p = 0.007). Multivariate analyses revealed that d-mGPS was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.18, p = 0.004) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 9.98, p = 0.01). Preoperative mGPS = 2 was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 5.53, p = 0.04). The results indicated that mGPS might serve as a valuable indicator of the immunonutritional status of preoperative patients, and a preoperative change of the status might affect the long-term outcomes of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.     

Relation Between Thyroid Hormones and Insulin Resistance in Hemodialysis Patients

Insulin resistance (IR) is a common problem in patients with ESRD on regular HD, and it is related to many complications, including cardiovascular complications, the major killer in these patients. Disorders of thyroid function are common in patients with ESRD. Many factors have been claimed to contribute to IR in HD patients. Our aim is to study the relations between thyroid hormones and IR in HD patients for better understanding and management of IR. The study involved 35 patients with ESRD under regular HD (group 1) and 20 normal control subjects (group 2). All of them underwent complete history taking and clinical examination: biochemical and hematological, thyroid hormones TSH, free T3 (FT3) and free T4 (FT4), and insulin resistance using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). Patients with DM and those with known thyroid disorders were excluded from the study. Comparing HD patients and normal control subjects shows significant differences as regards FT3 (p = 0.04) 33.58 ± 12.14 vs. 40.63 ± 11.27 pg/l, respectively; TSH (p = 0.03) 3.29 ± 3.83 vs. 1.80 ± 0.88 mu/l, respectively; fasting insulin level (p < 0.001) 30.1 ± 6.05 vs. 10.68 ± 2.77 mu/ml, respectively; HOMA (p < 0.001) 6.72 ± 1.41 vs. 2.4 ± 0.67, respectively. There is no significant difference as regards FT4 (p = 0.36) 15.17 ± 6.72 vs. 16.35 ± 2.66 pmol/l, respectively. Bivariate correlation in HD patients shows HOMA IR correlates with FT3 (p < 0.001), FT4 (p < 0.001), TSH (p < 0.001), HDL (p < 0.001), and hematocrit (p < 0.001). No correlations were found with BMI, age, total cholesterol, LDL, or triglycerides. Linear regression analysis showed HOMA-IR was independently determined by HDL (p = 0.04), hematocrit (p = 0.02), and TSH (p = 0.008). IR is very common in HD patients. There is a close correlation between IR and thyroid hormones. TSH, HDL, and hematocrit levels independently determine IR. Regular follow-up of these factors is necessary for proper management of IR.     

Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy

Background

A robotic system (da Vinci^® Surgical System, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has technical advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery because it increases the precision and accuracy of anatomical dissection. The present study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between robot-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) and laparoscopic ISR for distal rectal cancer.

Methods

Patients who underwent robot- or laparoscopy-assisted ISR for rectal cancer between March 2008 and July 2011 were included in this retrospective comparative study. Perioperative and postoperative data, including complications and early functional outcomes, were analyzed between the two groups. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Wexner scoring system, the International Prostate Symptom Score, and the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function.

Results

A total of 40 patients underwent robot-assisted and 40 underwent laparoscopic ISR. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (235.5 vs. 185.4 min; p < 0.001). Transabdominal ISR, in which intersphincteric dissection is completed in the pelvic cavity, was performed more with robotic assistance than with laparoscopic surgery (8 vs. 2 cases; p = 0.043). No difference was observed between groups regarding postoperative morbidity and pathological outcomes. The robot-assisted group showed a trend toward less postoperative blood loss and early recovery of functional outcomes.

Conclusion

Robot-assisted surgery was safe and effective for ISR of distal rectal cancer and showed surgical outcomes similar to those of the latest laparoscopic ISR. The favorable results of the robot-assisted ISR included reduced adaptation time, alleviated difficulty of perineal phase, and early recovery of functional outcomes in this analysis of short-term clinical outcomes.     

Reducing Residual and Recurrent Stones by Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis

The long-term outcomes of 97 consecutive patients with hepatolithiasis, who underwent treatment from January 1971 to June 2006, were analyzed. The short-term outcomes included the rate of residual stones and complications after treatment, whereas the long-term results included the stone recurrence rate. In 22 of the 97 (22.7%) patients, residual stones were found after treatment for hepatolithiasis. The incidence of residual stones was 0% in hepatectomy patients, 48.6% in cholangioenterostomy patients (p < 0.001, compared with hepatectomy), 25.0% in T-tube drainage patients (p = 0.015, compared with hepatectomy), and 10.0% in percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) patients. In 15 of the 66 (22.7%) patients who were treated for hepatolithiasis, recurrent stones were found after intervals of 5 to 24 years. The incidence of recurrent stones was 13.9% in hepatectomy patients, 28.5% in cholangioenterostomy patients, 25.0% in T-tube drainage patients, and 50.0% in PTCSL patients (p = 0.021, compared with hepatectomy). Hepatectomy appears to be the most effective treatment for selected patients with isolated left hepatolithiasis (L). In PTCSL procedures, favorable results have been obtained when the stones were completely cleared; however, the incidence of recurrent stones is high in patients after PTCSL.     

Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients Aged 75 Years or More

Background  The aim of this study was to clarify the characteristics of elderly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients aged 75 years or more who underwent hepatectomy and to clarify whether elderly patients with HCC benefit from hepatectomy. Methods  Between January 1990 and December 2006, 570 patients underwent curative hepatectomy for HCC. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 75 years or more. Clinicopathological data and outcomes after hepatectomy for 64 elderly and 502 younger patients were prospectively collected and compared. Results  The proportion of elderly patients with chronic viral infection was less than that of younger patients (p < 0.001). Cirrhotic patients in the elderly group were less than those in the younger group (p = 0.03). The elderly patients had better liver function than did the younger patients (p = 0.007) but had more advanced HCC with microscopic vascular invasion than did the younger patients (p = 0.04). There was no operative mortality in the elderly patients and there was no significant difference in postoperative complication rates and long-term survival after hepatectomy between the two groups. Conclusions  Hepatectomy for elderly patients with resectable HCC is safe and feasible. Selected elderly patients with HCC might benefit from hepatectomy. This work originated from the Department of Surgery, Division of Frontier Medical Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.     

Sleep Disorders in Hemodialysis Patients

A high prevalence of sleep disorders has been reported in patients with renal failure and is linked to cardiovascular complications in those patients. The exact etiology and pathogenesis of sleep disorders are not exactly known. Knowledge of the underlying factors helps to define better management for these complications. The study involved 30 patients with ESRD on regular hemodialysis (HD; group 1) and 20 normal control subjects (group 2). For both groups complete history taking and clinical examination, assessment of sleep disorders using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), biochemical tests, efficiency of dialysis using KT/V in the patient group and plasma interleukin-6 level using ELISA technique were done. Poor sleep (PSQI > 5) was found in 70% of the patient group vs. 15% of the control group with significant differences between group 1 and 2 regarding mean PSQI (p < 0.001; 9.53 ± 5.46, 3.7 ± 2.53, respectively). The greatest sleep disorder in the patient group was sleep efficiency. The PSQI score is independently determined by KT/V (p = 0.03), LDL (p = 0.005), age (p = 0.04), coffee consumption (p = 0.03), Hb (p = 0.024), and IL-6 levels (p = 0.004). Independent predictors for poor sleep are age (p = 0.001), serum albumin (p < 0.001), KT/V (p = 0.001), and IL-6 levels (p < 0.001). Sleep disorders are very common in HD patients. Independent predictors for poor sleep are age, serum albumin, KT/V, and IL-6 levels. Sleep disorders are significantly associated with the efficiency of dialysis and IL-6 levels, which are related to inflammation. Sleep disorders may be a possible cause of the oxidative stress and inflammation in hemodialysis patients contributing to the development of complications.     

Impact of Residents on Safety Outcomes in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

New training programs face quality concern by faculty who believe resident involvement in operative management may lead to poorer outcomes. This study aims to understand the impact of resident surgeons on outcomes in a specific common surgical procedure. We obtained a retrospective review of 1216 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases between June 2012 and June 2017 at a community teaching hospital. Data reviewed included patient demographics, operative time, length of stay, 30-day outcomes. An initial analysis comparing outcomes with/without resident participation was undertaken. A subset analysis comparing junior (PGY 1–2) and senior (PGY 3–5) groups was also performed. We found the resident group participated in higher-risk patient (ASA > 3, 47.5% vs 39.8%, p = 0.04 more acute disease (59.8% vs 37.5%, p < 0.0001) and emergent surgery (59.7% vs 37.5%, p < 0.0001). Resident involvement in severe cases was not a significant factor in the odds of morbidity, mortality, conversion rate or length of stay. Resident participation did increase the odds of having longer OR time (OR 12.54, 95% CI 7.74–17.34, p < 0.0001). Resident participation is associated with increased operative times but not complications. This study confirms resident participation in the operating room in difficult and challenging cases is safe.     

Safety of Conservative Management of Bile Leakage after Hepatectomy with Biliary Reconstruction

Background  The risks associated with the conservative management of bile leakage after hepatectomy and associated cholangiojejunostomy are not well defined. Aim  The aim of this study was to evaluate incidence and severity of complications associated with bile leakages after liver resection with biliary reconstruction. Patients and methods  Clinical data from 1,034 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection were prospectively collected and reviewed. Bile leakage occurred in 25 out of 119 patients (21.0%) who underwent hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction (group 1) and in 42 out of 915 patients (4.6%) without biliary anastomosis (group 2; p < 0.001). Serum albumin and bilirubin levels were the only preoperative factors significantly different between the two groups. Lymphadenectomy was more frequently performed in patients of group 1 (88% vs 16.7, p < 0.001). Results  Mortality rates were similar in the two groups (8% in group 1 vs 2.3% in group 2, p = 0.28). One or more postoperative complications occurred in 68% in group 1 and in 40.4% in group 2 (p = 0.02). The incidence of sepsis (32% vs 7.1%, p = 0.01), intra-abdominal abscess (12% vs 0, p = 0.04), and abdominal bleeding (28% vs 0, p = 0.006) was significantly higher in group 1. Bile leaks spontaneously healed in 52% of patients in group 1 vs 76.2% in group 2 (p = 0.04). In order to identify independent predictive factors for abdominal bleeding, we compared clinical data of patients with abdominal bleeding (seven patients) and without abdominal bleeding (18 patients) after hepatectomy and biliary reconstruction. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the number of reconstructed bile ducts as an independent predictive factor of abdominal bleeding (p = 0.038). Conclusions  Conservative management of bile leakage after liver resection with biliary reconstruction is associated with higher rates of morbidity. The most severe complication is abdominal bleeding, which is related to the number of bile ducts requiring reconstruction.     

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been becoming more and more popular in patients with symptomatic choledocholithiasis. However, the safety and effectiveness of LCBDE in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis is still uncertain. This meta-analysis is aimed to appraise the safety and feasibility of LCBDE for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis. Studies comparing elderly patients and younger patients who underwent LCBDE for common bile duct stone were reviewed and collected from the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Primary outcomes were stone clearance rate, overall complication rate, and mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were operative time, conversion rate, pulmonary complication, bile leakage, reoperation, residual stone rate, and recurrent stone rate. Nine studies, including two prospective studies and seven retrospective studies, met the inclusion criteria. There were 2004 patients in this meta-analysis, including 693 elderly patients and 1311 younger patients. There was no statistically significant difference between elderly patients and younger patients regarding stone clearance rate (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.42–1.26; p = 0.25), overall complication rate (OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.94–1.82; p = 0.12), and mortality rate (OR 2.80; 95% CI 0.82–9.53; p = 0.10). Similarly, the operative time, conversion rate, bile leakage, reoperation, residual stone rate, and recurrent stone rate showed no significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05). While elderly patients showed high risk for pulmonary complication (OR 4.41; 95% CI 1.78–10.93; p = 0.001) compared with younger patients. Although there is associated with higher pulmonary complication, LCBDE is still considered as a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis.     

Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort

Rectal cancer is frequent in Germany and worldwide. Several studies have assessed laparoscopic surgery as a treatment option and most have shown favorable results. However, long-term oncologic safety remains a controversial issue. The current dataset derives from 30 clinical cancer registries in Germany and includes 16,378 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between 2007 and 2016. Outcomes were 90-day mortality, overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (RFS) and relative survival of patients treated with either open or laparoscopic surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors that affected the probability of a patient undergoing laparoscopic surgery as well as to evaluate short-term mortality. OS and RFS were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression conducted separately for UICC stages I–III, tumor location, and sex as well as by propensity score matching followed by univariable and multivariable survival analysis. Of 16,378 patients, 4540 (27.7%) underwent laparoscopic surgery, a trend which increased during the observation period. Patients undergoing laparoscopy attained better results for 90-day mortality (odds ratio, OR 0.658, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.526–0.822). The 5-year OS rate in the laparoscopic group was 82.6%, vs. 76.6% in the open surgery group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.819 in multivariable Cox regression (95% CI 0.747–0.899, p < 0.001). The laparoscopic group showed a better 5-year RFS, with 81.8 vs. 74.3% and HR 0.770 (95% CI 0.705–0.842, p < 0.001). The 5-year relative survival rates were also in favor of laparoscopy, with 93.1 vs. 88.4% (p = 0.012). Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer can be performed safely and, according to this study, is associated with an oncological outcome superior to that of the open procedure. Therefore, in the absence of individual contraindications, it should be considered as a standard approach.     

Who Benefits from Gastric Banding?

Background In the present study, criteria were investigated to predict major benefit after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Materials and Methods 85 morbidly obese patients were operated with LAGB between 1999 and 2005. Seventy-one of these patients were analyzed according to several possible predictive characteristics for success as the primary endpoint. Success was defined as excess body weight loss (EBWL) >50% and no band removal. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 8–90 months). Results In total, median EBWL was 43% (−41 to 171.5%) with a decrease in BMI of 8.0 kg/m² (−9 to 35 kg/m²). Success rate was 37% (n = 26). These patients were compared to all other patients (n = 45). Significant success predictors were baseline absolute BW, EBW, BMI (p < 0.01), BMI with a threshold value of 50 kg/m² (p = 0.02), and female sex (p = 0.02) as well as postoperative vomiting (p = 0.02), eating behavior and physical activity after LAGB (p < 0.01). Baseline EBW and change in eating behavior after surgery were identified as independent predictors in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Patients with a lower excess body weight who improve especially their eating behavior after surgery have the highest chance of success after LAGB.     

Impact on laboratory training in subsequent performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-lasting influence of laparoscopic training during residency course on outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Materials and methods  We compared outcomes of LC in patients treated by surgeons who have learned LC by the traditional surgical residency program (traditional group; n = 15) with those of LC operated on by surgeons who received additional intensive laboratory training in their residency [Jikei Surgical Skill Training Program (JSTP) group; n = 9]. Results  Among the 503 patients subjected to LC, 302 (60.0%) cases were performed by surgeons in the traditional group and 201 (40.0%) cases in the JSTP group. The patient characteristics, operative outcome variables, and the pathological findings of the gallbladder were comparable in the two groups. Despite no difference in the above factors, conversion rates were significantly higher in the traditional group compared with the JSTP group (10.6% vs 5.0%; p = 0.026). In multivariate analysis, training background was an independent risk factor for conversion to open surgery (odds ratio, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.25–6.24). Conclusions  To ensure competence for laparoscopic skills, we propose that such training program should be integrated into the curriculum of the general surgery residency.     

A Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Lateral Hepatic Sectionectomy

Background Left lateral sectionectomy is one of the most commonly performed laparoscopic liver resections, but limited clinical data are actually available to support the advantage of laparoscopic versus open-liver surgery. The present study compared the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in a case-matched analysis. Materials and Methods Surgical outcome of 20 patients who underwent left lateral sectionectomy by laparoscopic approach (LHR group) from September 2005 to January 2007 were compared in a case-control analysis with those of 20 patients who underwent open left lateral sectionectomy (OHR group). Both groups were similar for: tumor size, preoperative laboratory data, presence of cirrhosis, and histology of the lesion. Surgical procedures were performed in both groups combining the ultrasonic dissector and the ultrasonic coagulating cutter without portal clamping. Results Compared with OHR, the LHR group had a decreased blood loss (165 mL versus 214 mL, P = 0.001), and earlier postoperative recovery (4.5 versus 5.8 days, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in terms of surgical margin and operative time. Morbidity was comparable between the two groups, but two cases of postoperative ascites were recorded in two cirrhotic patients in the OHR. Major complications were not observed in either groups. Conclusions Laparoscopic resection results in reduced operative blood loss and earlier recovery with oncologic clearance and operative time comparable with open surgery. Laparoscopic liver surgery may be considered the approach of choice for tumors located in the left hepatic lobe.     

Clinical role of serum programmed death ligand 1 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Where does it come from?

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a key target for the treatment of several malignancies. The present study was conducted to clarify the role of serum PD-L1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Serum PD-L1 (sPD-L1) was examined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 153 patients with HCC who underwent curative hepatectomy at Kumamoto University in 2011–2016. The expression of PD-L1 in tissue (tPD-L1) was investigated by immunohistochemistry. The clinical roles of the PD-L1 expression in both serum and tissue were examined. The sPD-L1 was significantly elevated in HCC patients compared to patients without any malignant or inflammatory disease (234 vs. 93 pg/mL, p < 0.0001). The percentage of the tPD-L1-positive area (%tPD-L1) in the background liver was significantly higher than in the tumor (1.52% vs. 0.48%, p < 0.0001). The %tPD-L1 in the background liver but not in the tumor was significantly correlated with the sPD-L1 level (p = 0.0079). The sPD-L1, %tPD-L1 in the tumor, and %tPD-L1 in the background liver were not correlated with the overall survival after surgery. PD-L1-expressing cells in the background liver, but not in the tumor tissue, appeared to contribute to the sPD-L1 level. The sPD-L1 level may thus not indicate the tumor burden in patients with HCC.