Screening for Periprosthetic Joint Infections With ESR and CRP: The Ideal Cutoffs

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to (1) determine the sensitivity and specificity of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) when screening for a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) using the standard MSIS cutoff of 30 mm/h and 10 mg/L, respectively, and (2) determine the optimal ESR and CRP cutoff to achieve a sensitivity ≥95%.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 81 PJI patients and 83 noninfected arthroplasty patients. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity (and 95% confidence intervals) for ESR and CRP at thresholds of 30 mm/h and 10 mg/L, respectively. We determined the optimal cutoff for both ESR and CRP to yield a sensitivity greater than or equal to 95%.ResultsThe ESR cutoff that resulted in a sensitivity ≥ to 95% (95% CI: 85.2-97.6%) was 10 mm/h, and the CRP cutoff that resulted in a sensitivity ≥ to 95% (95% CI: 87.1-98.4%) was 5 mg/L. The sensitivity and specificity with a combined ESR and CRP of 10 mm/h and 5 mg/L was 100% (95% CI: 94.1-100%) and 54.7% (95% CI: 46.4-62.3%).ConclusionWhen using ESR and CRP as a screening tool with the accepted cutoffs of 30 mm/h and 10 mg/L, there is an unacceptably low sensitivity and a high number of false negatives. Therefore, further recommendation must be given to lowering these thresholds to avoid the devastating morbidity of a missed PJI.Level of EvidenceIII.     

Plasma Fibrin Degradation Product and D-Dimer Are of Limited Value for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundAlthough the Musculoskeletal Infection Society introduced the use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as inflammatory markers for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), no single blood marker reliably detects infection before revision arthroplasty. We therefore posed 2 questions: (1) Are fibrin degradation product (FDP) and D-dimer of value for diagnosing PJI before revision arthroplasty? (2) What are their sensitivity and specificity for that purpose?MethodsTo answer these questions, we retrospectively enrolled 318 patients (129 with PJI [group A], 189 with aseptic mechanical failure [group B]) who underwent revision arthroplasty during 2013-2018. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine maximum sensitivity and specificity of the 2 markers. Inflammatory and fibrinolytic markers were evaluated based on (1) the Tsukayama-type infection present and (2) the 3 most common PJI-related pathogens.ResultsFDP and D-dimer levels were higher in group A than in group B: 4.97 ± 2.83 vs 4.14 ± 2.67 mg/L and 2.14 ± 2.01 vs 1.51 ± 1.37 mg/L fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU), respectively (both P < .05). Based on the Youden index, 2.95 mg/L and 1.02 mg/L FEU are the optimal FDP and D-dimer predictive cutoffs, respectively, for diagnosing PJI. Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 65.12% and 60.33% (FDP) and 68.29% and 50.70% (D-dimer). ESR, CRP, and interleukin-6 values were diagnostically superior to those of FDP and D-dimer.ConclusionThe value of plasma FDP and D-dimer for diagnosing PJI is limited compared with traditional inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP, interleukin-6) before revision arthroplasty.     

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Alpha-Defensin Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Diseases

BackgroundThe alpha-defensin test has been reported to have high accuracy to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). There are remaining concerns about the utility of the test in patients with inflammatory diseases. The purpose of this study is to determine sensitivity and specificity of laboratory-based alpha-defensin in diagnosing PJI in patients with systemic inflammatory disease in revision total hip/knee arthroplasty.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of 1374 cases who underwent revision total hip/knee arthroplasty at a single healthcare system from 2014 to 2017. Cases with inflammatory diseases who received a 1-stage revision arthroplasty, the first stage of 2-stage revision arthroplasty, or irrigation and debridement with available preoperative alpha-defensin results were included. Patients who received a second-stage procedure, spacer exchange, who had insufficient Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, or with early postoperative PJI were excluded from this study. Cases were classified as infected or not according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. A total of 41 cases met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of alpha-defensin to diagnose PJI were calculated.ResultsThe alpha-defensin test demonstrated a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, a negative predictive value of 96%, and an accuracy of 97% for diagnosing PJI. There was 1 patient with polymyositis who had a false-negative result.ConclusionAlpha-defensin had high accuracy for diagnosing PJI even in inflammatory diseases. The alpha-defensin test provides useful information with high accuracy in diagnosing PJI in patients with inflammatory diseases.     

Sensitivity and Specificity of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers in Diagnosis of Infection in Head-Neck Taper Corrosion of Metal-On-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the setting of adverse local tissue reactions in patients with metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA) secondary to head-neck taper junction corrosion is challenging as it frequently has the appearance of purulence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and synovial fluid markers in diagnosing PJI in failed MoP THA due to head-neck taper corrosion.MethodsA total of 89 consecutive patients with MoP THA with head-neck taper corrosion in 2 groups was evaluated: (1) infection group (n = 11) and (2) noninfection group (n = 78). All patients had highly crossed polyethylene with cobalt chromium femoral heads and had preoperative synovial fluid aspiration. In addition, serum cobalt and chromium levels were analyzed.ResultsThe optimal cutoff value for synovial white blood cell was 2144 with 93% sensitivity and 84% specificity. Neutrophil count optimal cutoff value was 82% with 93% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of ESR and CRP determined optimal cutoff at 57 mm/h and 35 mg/L with 57% sensitivity and 94% specificity and 93% sensitivity and 76% specificity, respectively. There were no significant differences in metal ion levels between the infected and noninfected groups.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that ESR and CRP are useful in excluding PJI, whereas both synovial white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage in hip aspirate are useful markers for diagnosing infection in MoP THA patients with head-neck taper corrosion associated adverse local tissue reaction.     

Serum Fibrinogen Test Performs Well for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundSerum fibrinogen (FIB) is an acute-phase glycoprotein in the infection response that may stop excessive bleeding. The purposes of this study are to determine the value of FIB that can be used to differentiate between periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening of the prosthesis, and to determine the clinical significance of FIB for analyzing infection outcomes after first-stage surgery.MethodsThis retrospective study included 90 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty revision from January 2015 to August 2019. PJI was confirmed in 53 patients (group A), and the other 37 patients were diagnosed with aseptic loosening of the prosthesis (group B). Only 21 patients in group A documented the results for serum FIB, C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) after spacer insertion, so the postoperative serological marker levels of the these patients were also assessed.ResultsThe FIB, CRP, and ESR levels were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest for FIB at 0.928. Analyses of FIB levels revealed a sensitivity of 79.25% and a specificity of 94.59%. FIB levels were significantly lower in patients with PJI after spacer insertion (P < .001).ConclusionFIB is an adequate test to aid in diagnosing PJI, and it is not inferior to CRP and ESR in distinguishing between PJI and aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. It is an especially useful tool in assessing infection outcomes after first-stage surgery.     

Synovial Fluid Viscosity Test is Promising for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundSo far there is no “gold standard” test for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), compelling clinicians to rely on several serological and synovial fluid tests with no 100% accuracy. Synovial fluid viscosity is one of the parameters defining the rheology properties of synovial fluid. We hypothesized that patients with PJI may have a different level of synovial fluid viscosity and aimed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of synovial fluid viscosity in detecting PJI.MethodsThis prospective study was initiated to enroll patients undergoing primary and revision arthroplasty. Our cohort consisted of 45 patients undergoing revision for PJI (n = 15), revision for aseptic failure (n = 15), and primary arthroplasty (n = 15). PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. In all patients, synovial fluid viscosity, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plasma d-dimer levels were measured preoperatively.ResultsThe synovial fluid viscosity level was significantly lower (P = .0011) in patients with PJI (7.93 mPa·s, range 3.0-15.0) than in patients with aseptic failure (13.11 mPa·s, range 6.3-20.4). Using Youden’s index, 11.80 mPa·s was determined as the optimal threshold value for synovial fluid viscosity for the diagnosis of PJI. Synovial fluid viscosity outperformed CRP, ESR, and plasma d-dimer, with a sensitivity of 93.33% and a specificity of 66.67%.ConclusionSynovial fluid viscosity seems to be on the same level of accuracy with CRP, ESR, and d-dimer regarding PJI detection and to be a promising marker for the diagnosis of PJI.     

Concomitant Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Periprosthetic Fracture: Diagnostic Utility of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers

BackgroundDiagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with a periprosthetic fracture can be challenging due to concerns regarding the reliability of commonly used serum and synovial fluid markers. This study aimed at determining the diagnostic performance of serum and synovial fluid markers for diagnosing PJI in patients with a periprosthetic fracture of a total joint arthroplasty.MethodsA total of 144 consecutive patients were included: (1) 41 patients with concomitant PJI and periprosthetic fracture and (2) 103 patients with periprosthetic fracture alone. Serum markers erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), and synovial markers white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear percentage were assessed.ResultsESR demonstrated 87% sensitivity and 48% specificity at the Musculoskeletal Infection Society threshold, area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, and optimal threshold of 45.5 mm/h (76% sensitivity, 68% specificity). CRP showed 94% sensitivity and 40% specificity, AUC of 0.68 with optimal threshold of 16.7 mg/L (84% sensitivity, 51% specificity). Synovial WBC count demonstrated 87% sensitivity and 78% specificity, AUC of 0.90 with optimal threshold of 4552 cells/μL (86% sensitivity, 85% specificity). Polymorphonuclear percentage showed 79% sensitivity and 63% specificity, AUC of 0.70 with optimal threshold of 79.5% (74% sensitivity, 63% specificity). The AUC of all combined markers was 0.90 with 84% sensitivity and 79% specificity.ConclusionThe diagnostic utility of the serum and synovial markers for diagnosing PJI was lower in the setting of concomitant periprosthetic fracture compared to PJI alone. Using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society thresholds, ESR, CRP, and WBC count showed high sensitivity, yet low specificity, thus higher thresholds and utilizing all serum and synovial markers in combination should be considered.     

Laboratory Value Effectiveness in Predicting Early Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundDiagnosing early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains challenging. We sought to validate optimal laboratory value cutoffs for detecting early PJIs in a series of primary THAs from one institution.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 22,795 primary THAs performed between 2000 and 2019. Within 12 weeks, 43 hips (43 patients) underwent arthrocentesis. Patients were divided into 2 groups: evaluation ≤6 weeks or 6-12 weeks following THA. The 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society major criteria for PJI diagnosed PJI in 15 patients. Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare median laboratory values and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate optimal cutoff values.ResultsBoth within 6 weeks and between 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively, median C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil percentage, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) values were significantly higher in infected THAs. Optimal cutoffs within 6 weeks were: CRP ≥100 mg/L, synovial WBCs ≥4390 cells/μL, neutrophil percentage ≥74%, and ANC ≥3249 cells/μL. Between 6 and 12 weeks, optimal cutoffs were: CRP ≥33 mg/L, synovial WBCs ≥26,995 cells/μL, neutrophil percentage ≥93%, and ANC ≥25,645 cells/μL.ConclusionEarly PJI following THA should be suspected within 6 weeks with CRP ≥100 mg/L or synovial WBCs ≥4390 cells/μL. Between 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively, cutoffs of CRP ≥33 mg/L, synovial fluid WBC ≥26,995 cells/μL, and neutrophil percentage ≥93% diagnosed PJI with high accuracy.Level of EvidenceLevel IV Diagnostic.     

The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Identifying Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Failed Partial Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundIndications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and patello-femoral arthroplasty are expanding. Despite the lower published infection rates for UKA and patello-femoral arthroplasty than total knee arthroplasty, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and diagnostic thresholds for commonly utilized tests have not been investigated recently. Thus, this study evaluated if diagnostic thresholds for PJI in patients who had a failed partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) align more closely with previously reported thresholds specific to UKA or the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection.MethodsWe identified 109 knees in 100 patients that underwent PKA with eventual conversion to total knee arthroplasty within a single healthcare system from 2000 to 2021. Synovial fluid nucleated cell count and synovial polymorphonuclear percentage in addition to preoperative serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein, and serum white blood cell count were compared with Student’s t-tests between septic and aseptic cases. Receiver operating characteristic curves and Youden’s index were used to assess diagnostic performance and the optimal cutoff point of each test.ResultsSynovial nucleated cell count, synovial polymorphonuclear percentage, and serum C-reactive protein demonstrated excellent discrimination for diagnosing PJI with an area under the curve of 0.97 and lower cutoff values than the previously determined UKA specific criteria. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rateESR demonstrated good ability with an area under the curve of 0.89.ConclusionSerum and synovial fluid diagnostic thresholds for PJI in PKAs align more closely with the thresholds established by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting as compared to previously proposed thresholds specific to UKA.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.     

Combined Measurement of D-Dimer and C-Reactive Protein Levels: Highly Accurate for Diagnosing Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundDiagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging and elusive in the absence of a gold standard. D-dimer plays an important role in inflammation that occurs during infections and therefore could be a valuable biomarker for PJI. This study aims to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer in detecting chronic PJI and to improve the accuracy of chronic PJI diagnosis through combined measurement of serum D-dimer with C-reactive protein (CRP)/erythrocyte sedimentation rate.MethodsOne hundred twenty-two patients presenting with a painful knee or hip after total hip or total knee arthroplasty for surgical revision were included in this prospective trial. Our cohort consisted of 55 patients undergoing revision for chronic PJI and 67 patients undergoing revision for aseptic failure. PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve were analyzed for each biomarker.ResultsThe area under the curve for D-dimer was 0.915 and was more accurate than serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate 0.719 and CRP 0.761. 1170 ng/mL was determined to be the optimal threshold value of D-dimer for the diagnosis of chronic PJI, with a sensitivity of 92.73% and a specificity of 74.63% in the diagnosis of chronic PJI. The combination of D-dimer and CRP tests demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.11% and negative predictive value of 96.55% for the diagnosis of chronic PJI.ConclusionThe present study identified the D-dimer is a valuable biomarker in detecting chronic PJI. The combinations of serum D-dimer and CRP led to the improvement of sensitivity compared with those of the single-index test.     

Diagnostic Value of Synovial White Blood Cell Count and Serum C-Reactive Protein for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Knee Arthroplasty

Background

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains difficult, particularly in acute postoperative stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal cutoff value of synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, percentage of polymorphonuclear cells, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein (CRP) for diagnosing early postoperative infection after knee joint arthroplasty.

Utility of Diagnostic Markers in Late Periprosthetic Joint Infection Workup for Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Who Received Antibiotics 48 Hours Before Aspiration

BackgroundDiagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains challenging despite recent advancements in testing and evolving criteria over the last decade. Moreover, the effects of antibiotic use on diagnostic markers are not fully understood. Thus, this study sought to determine the influence of antibiotic use within 48 hours before knee aspiration on synovial and serum laboratory values for suspected late PJI.MethodsPatients who underwent a TKA and subsequent knee arthrocentesis for PJI workup at least 6 weeks after their index arthroplasty were reviewed across a single healthcare system from 2013 to 2020. Median synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, synovial polymorphonuclear (PMN) percentage, serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum WBC count were compared between immediate antibiotic and nonantibiotic PJI groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden’s index were used to determine test performance and diagnostic cutoffs for the immediate antibiotics group.ResultsThe immediate antibiotics group had significantly more culture-negative PJIs than the no antibiotics group (38.1 versus 16.2%, P = .0124). Synovial WBC count demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability for late PJI in the immediate antibiotics group (area under curve, AUC = 0.97), followed by synovial PMN percentage (AUC = 0.88), serum CRP (AUC = 0.86), and serum ESR (AUC = 0.82).ConclusionAntibiotic use immediately preceding knee aspiration should not preclude the utility of synovial and serum lab values for the diagnosis of late PJI. Instead, these markers should be considered thoroughly during infection workup considering the high rate of culture-negative PJI in these patients.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.     

Plasma Fibrinogen and Platelet Count Are Referable Tools for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundAlthough the MusculoSkeletal Infection Society has suggested a series of markers to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), no single marker can accurately identify infection before revision hip or knee arthroplasty, and exploring promising markers to easily and reliably diagnose PJI is ongoing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of plasma fibrinogen and platelet count for diagnosing PJI.MethodsWe retrospectively included 439 patients who underwent revision arthroplasty from January 2008 to December 2018; 79 patients with coagulation-related comorbidities were evaluated separately. The remaining 360 patients constituted 153 PJI and 207 non-PJI patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the maximum sensitivity and specificity of the tested markers.ResultsThe receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the areas under the curve for plasma fibrinogen, platelet count, and serum C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were 0.834, 0.746, 0.887, and 0.842, respectively. Based on Youden's index, the optimal predictive cutoffs for fibrinogen and platelet count were 3.57 g/L and 221 × 10⁹/L, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 68.6% and 86.0% (fibrinogen) and 57.5% and 83.1% (platelet count) for diagnosing PJI. The sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 76.7% and 72.2% (fibrinogen) and 48.8% and 63.9% (platelet count) for diagnosing PJI in patients with coagulation-related comorbidities.ConclusionPlasma fibrinogen performed well for diagnosing PJI before revision arthroplasty, and its value neared that of traditional inflammatory markers. Although the diagnostic value of the platelet count was inferior to traditional markers, its diagnostic value was fair for diagnosing PJI. Fibrinogen also may be useful for diagnosing PJI in patients with coagulation-related comorbidities.     

D-Dimer,Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate,and C-Reactive Protein Sensitivities for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis

BackgroundThere is contradicting evidence on the diagnostic value of inflammatory biomarkers for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to quantify the sensitivity of D-dimer for acute and chronic PJI diagnosis and evaluate D-dimer lab values in the 90-day postoperative window in a control cohort of primary joint arthroplasty patients for comparison.MethodsAn institutional database was queried for patients undergoing revision procedures for PJI after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2014 to present. CRP, ESR, and D-dimer were collected within 90 days pre and postoperatively and sensitivities for the diagnosis of PJI were calculated. The control group included patients who underwent a negative diagnostic workup for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolus (PE) and had a D-dimer lab collected within 90 days postoperatively from primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA).ResultsA total of 604 PJI patients were identified, and 81 patients had D-dimer, ESR, and CRP collected. There were 50/81 acute PJI patients and 31/81 chronic PJI patients who had median D-dimer values of 2,136.5 ng/mL [interquartile range (IQR): 1,642-3,966.5] and 3,336 ng/mL [IQR: 1,976-5,594]. Only the chronic PJI group had significantly higher D-dimer values when compared to the control cohort (P = .009). The sensitivity of D-dimer was calculated to be 92% and 93.5% in the acute and chronic PJI groups, respectively.ConclusionSerum D-dimer may not have high diagnostic utility for acute PJI, especially in the setting of recent surgery; however, it still may be useful for patients who have chronic PJI.     

A simple, cost-effective screening protocol to rule out periprosthetic infection

The differential diagnosis of pain after total knee arthroplasty includes infection. Effective screening tools should have high sensitivity and are cost-effective. We evaluated 296 patients who underwent total knee revision at our institution. One hundred sixteen patients (39%) were classified as infected and 180 patients (61%) were considered noninfected. The mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) of the infected patients were 85 mm/h and 110 mg/L, respectively. The mean ESR and CRP of the noninfected patients were 22 mm/h and 7 mg/L, respectively. Five patients (4%) in the infected group had both normal ESR and CRP. Infection was suspected in all 5 patients, and an organism was cultured in 4 of the 5 cases. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP, when used in combination, serve as a useful screening tool in patients with a painful total knee arthroplasty.     

Comparison of a Comprehensive Set of Fibrinolytic Markers With C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundThe diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), a serious complication after primary total joint arthroplasty, remains challenging. Recently, fibrinolytic activities have been shown to be closely related to infections and inflammation. However, data assessing the value of fibrinolytic markers for the diagnosis of PJI have been sparse until now.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 157 patients undergoing revision for aseptic loosening (n = 106, group A) or revision for chronic PJI (n = 51, group B) from January 2014 to August 2019. PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, fibrin degradation product (FDP), and fibrinogen were measured preoperatively. The diagnostic values of each biomarker were analyzed and compared using receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, and specificity.ResultsCompared with group A, group B had significantly higher levels of CRP, ESR, D-dimer, FDP, and fibrinogen (P < .001). The area under the curve of fibrinogen was 0.914, which was slightly lower than that of CRP (0.924). FDP and D-dimer had area under the curve values of 0.808 and 0.784, respectively. The optimal threshold, sensitivity, and specificity were 3.56 g/L, 86.27%, and 83.96% for fibrinogen; 1.22 mg/L, 66.67%, and 85.85% for D-dimer; and 3.98 μg/mL, 72.55%, and 80.19% for FDP, respectively.ConclusionFibrinolytic markers provided promising diagnostic support for PJI, especially fibrinogen, which had a diagnostic efficiency similar to that of CRP and ESR.     

Serum Inflammatory Markers for Periprosthetic Knee Infection in Obese Versus Non-Obese Patients

Accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging. Most infection diagnosis criteria define elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) as > 1.0 mg/dL and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as > 30 mm/hour. Obesity has been reported as a pro-inflammatory state with elevated baseline CRP values. We hypothesized that higher cut-off values would be more accurate to diagnose PJI in obese patients due to their elevated baseline CRP. BMI, serum inflammatory markers, and synovial fluid were collected for 102 revision total knee arthroplasty patients, and analyzed for the highest area under the curve. We found a CRP of 3.6 mg/dL was more accurate to diagnose PJI in obese patients versus traditional values. Clinicians should be judicious and use additional criteria when diagnosing PJI in obese patients.     

Reevaluating Current Cutoffs for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Current Thresholds Are Insensitive

BackgroundDiagnosing acute periprosthetic joint infection remains a challenge. Several studies have proposed different acute cutoffs resulting in the International Consensus Meeting recommending a cutoff of 100 mg/L, 10,000 cell/μL and 90% for serum C-reactive protein (CRP), synovial white blood cell count (WBC), and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%), respectively. However, establishing cutoffs are difficult as the control group is limited to rare early aseptic revisions, and performing aspiration in asymptomatic patients is difficult because of a fear of seeding a well-functioning joint arthroplasty. This study (1) assessed the sensitivity of current thresholds for acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and (2) identified associated factors for false negatives.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with acute PJIs (n = 218), defined as less than 6 weeks from index arthroplasty, treated between 2000 and 2017. Diagnosis of PJI was based on 2 positive cultures of the same pathogen from the periprosthetic tissue or synovial fluid samples. Sensitivities of International Consensus Meeting cutoff values of CRP, synovial WBC, and PMN% were evaluated according to organism type. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine associated factors for false negatives.ResultsOverall, the sensitivity of CRP, synovial WBC, and PMN% for acute PJI was 55.3%, 59.6%, and 50.5%, respectively. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) demonstrated the lowest sensitivity for both CRP (37.5%) and WBC (55.6%). CNS infection was identified as an independent risk factor for false-negative CRP.ConclusionsCurrent thresholds for acute PJI may be missing approximately half of PJIs. Low virulent organisms, such as CNS, may be responsible for these false negatives. Current thresholds for acute PJI must be reexamined.     

关节假体周围感染患者血清学指标未达诊断阈值的影响因素分析

目的探讨关节假体周围感染(periprosthetic joint infection,PJI)患者血清C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)和红细胞沉降率(erythrocyte sedimentation rate,ESR)不符合2011版美国肌肉骨骼感染协会(Musculoskeletal Infection Society,MSIS)诊断标准的影响因素。方法2011年12月至2019年12月因PJI住院治疗的患者328例,男152例、女176例,年龄(62.10±13.74)岁(范围24~87岁);膝关节172例(52.4%),髋关节151例(46.0%),肘关节4例(1.2%),肩关节1例(0.3%)。所有患者均于术前或应用抗生素前行CRP和ESR检测,PJI的诊断采用2011版MSIS诊断标准:CRP≥10 mg/L且ESR≥30 mm/1 h。将患者根据Tsukayama分型、病原体类型及免疫状态等进行分组,比较不同组别患者CRP和ESR不符合MSIS标准(即未达诊断阈值)的发生率。结果119例(36.3%,119/328)CRP或ESR实测值不符合MSIS诊断标准。Tsukayama分型组间不符合率的差异无统计学意义(χ^2=7.224,P=0.065);培养结果阴性组不符合率为46.4%,高于培养阳性组的27.4%(χ^2=12.276,P<0.001);免疫A级组不符合率为42.9%,高于免疫B级组的30.6%和C级组的23.8%(χ^2=6.586,P=0.037)。Logistic回归分析结果提示,培养结果阳性患者发生不符合标准的风险是培养阴性患者的0.420倍(P=0.001);免疫B级患者出现不符合标准现象的风险是免疫A级患者的0.578倍(P=0.040)。结论免疫状态好及培养结果阴性的PJI患者更容易出现血清学指标未达诊断阈值的现象,诊断时应特别注意综合其他指标,以防漏诊。