High Bundled Payment Costs Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in African Americans

BackgroundConcerns exist that minorities who utilize more resources in an episode-of-care following total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) may face difficulties with access to quality arthroplasty care in bundled payment programs. The purpose of this study is to determine if African American patients undergoing TKA or THA have higher episode-of-care costs compared to Caucasian patients.MethodsWe queried Medicare claims data for a consecutive series of 7310 primary TKA and THA patients at our institution from 2015 to 2018. We compared patient demographics, comorbidities, readmissions, and 90-day episode-of-care costs between African American and Caucasian patients. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify the independent effect of race on episode-of-care costs.ResultsCompared to Caucasians, African Americans were younger, but had higher rates of pulmonary disease and diabetes. African American patients had increased rates of discharge to a rehabilitation facility (20% vs 13%, P < .001), with higher subacute rehabilitation ($1909 vs $1284, P < .001), home health ($819 vs $698, P = .022), post-acute care ($5656 vs $4961, P = .008), and overall 90-day episode-of-care costs ($19,457 vs $18,694, P = .001). When controlling for confounding comorbidities, African American race was associated with higher episode-of-care costs of $440 (P < .001).ConclusionAfrican American patients have increased episode-of-care costs following THA and TKA when compared to Caucasian patients, mainly due to increased rates of home health and rehabilitation utilization. Further study is needed to identify social variables that can help reduce post-acute care resources and prevent reduction in access to arthroplasty care in bundled payment models.     

Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty Needs Its Own Diagnosis-Related Group Code

BackgroundConversion from a prior knee procedure has been demonstrated to require greater operative times and resources, but still lacks a separate procedural or facility code from primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to determine differences in facility costs between patients who underwent primary TKA and those who underwent conversion TKA.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients undergoing primary TKA at 2 hospitals from 2015 to 2017, comparing itemized facility costs between primary and conversion TKA patients. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for increased facility costs, the need for additional implants, length of stay, and discharge disposition.ResultsOf 2447 TKA procedures, 678 (27.7%) underwent conversion TKA, which was associated with greater implant costs ($3931.47 vs $2864.67, P = .0120) and total facility costs in a multivariate regression ($94.30 increase, P = .0316). When controlling for confounding variables, patients with a prior ligament reconstruction ($402 increase, P = .0002) and prior open reduction and internal fixation ($847 increase, P = .0020) had higher costs and were more likely to require stemmed implants (P < .05). There was an increase in TKA implant cost by $538 in patients with implants from a prior procedure (P < .0001).ConclusionConversion TKA is associated with greater implant and inpatient facility costs than primary TKA, particularly those who had a history of an open knee procedure. A separate diagnosis-related group should be created for conversion TKA given the increased cost and complexity of these procedures compared to primary TKA.     

A Nurse Navigator Program Is Effective in Reducing Episode-of-Care Costs Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundAlternative payment models for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have incentivized providers to deliver higher quality care at a lower cost, prompting some institutions to develop formal nurse navigation programs (NNPs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a NNP for primary THA and TKA resulted in decreased episode-of-care (EOC) costs.MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of primary THA and TKA patients from 2015-2016 using claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Medicare Advantage patients from a private insurer. Three nurse navigators were hired to guide discharge disposition and home needs. Ninety-day EOC costs were collected before and after implementation of the NNP. To control for confounding variables, we performed a multivariate regression analysis to determine the independent effect of the NNP on EOC costs.ResultsDuring the study period, 5275 patients underwent primary TKA or THA. When compared with patients in the prenavigator group, the NNP group had reduced 90-day EOC costs ($19,116 vs $20,418 for Medicare and $35,378 vs $36,961 for private payer, P < .001 and P < .012, respectively). Controlling for confounding variables in the multivariate analysis, the NNP resulted in a $1575 per Medicare patient (P < .001) and a $1819 per private payer patient cost reduction (P = .005). This translates to a cost savings of at least $5,556,600 per year.ConclusionThe implementation of a NNP resulted in a marked reduction in EOC costs following primary THA and TKA. The cost savings significantly outweighs the added expense of the program. Providers participating in alternative payment models should consider using a NNP to provide quality arthroplasty care at a reduced cost.     

High-Quality Skilled Nursing Facilities Are Associated With Decreased Episode-of-Care Costs Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundWith the increasing popularity of alternative payment models following total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), efforts have focused on reducing post-acute care (PAC) costs, particularly patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The purpose of this study is to determine if preferentially discharging patients to high-quality SNFs can reduce bundled payment costs for primary THA and TKA.MethodsAt our institution, a quality improvement initiative for SNFs was implemented at the start of 2017, preferentially discharging patients to internally credentialed facilities, designated by several quality measures. Claims data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were queried to identify patients discharged to SNF following primary total joint arthroplasty. We compared costs and outcomes between patients discharged to credentialed SNF sites and those discharged to other sites.ResultsBetween 2015 and 2018, of a consecutive series of 8778 primary THA and TKA patients, 1284 (14.6%) were discharged to an SNF. Following initiation of the program, 498 patients were discharged to an SNF, 301 (60.4%) of which were sent to a credentialed facility. Patients at credentialed facilities had significantly lower SNF costs ($11,184 vs $8198, P < .0001), PAC costs ($18,952 vs $15,148, P < .0001), and episode-of-care costs ($34,557 vs $30,831, P < .0001), with no difference in readmissions (10% vs 12%, P = .33) or complications (8% vs 6%, P = .15). Controlling for confounding variables, being discharged to a credentialed facility decreased SNF costs by $1961 (P = .0020) and PAC costs by $3126 (P = .0031) per patient.ConclusionQuality improvement efforts through partnership with selective SNFs can significantly decrease PAC costs for patients undergoing primary THA and TKA.     

Bundled Payments Are Effective in Reducing Costs Following Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundAlternative payment models such the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative have been effective in reducing costs following unilateral total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), but few studies exist on bilateral arthroplasty. This study aimed to determine whether the BPCI program for bilateral THA and TKA reduced episode-of-care costs.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral primary THA and TKA between 2015 and 2016. We recorded demographic variables, comorbidities, readmissions, and calculated 90-day episode-of-care costs based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data. We compared data from patients before and after the start of our BPCI program, and performed a multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for increased costs.ResultsOf 319 patients, 38 underwent bilateral THA (12%) while 287 underwent bilateral TKA (88%). There were 239 patients (74%) in the bundled payment group. Although there was no change in readmission rate (9% vs 8%), the post-BPCI group demonstrated reduced hospital costs ($21,251 vs $18,783), post–acute care costs ($15,488 vs $12,439), and overall 90-day episode-of-care costs ($39,733 vs $34,305). When controlling for demographics, procedure, and comorbidities, our BPCI model demonstrated a per-patient reduction of $5811 in overall claims costs. Additional risk factors for increased episode-of-care costs included age ($516/y increase) and cardiac disease ($5916).ConclusionOur bundled payment program for bilateral THA and TKA was successful with reduction in 90-day episode-of-care costs without placing the patient at higher risk of readmission. Older Medicare beneficiaries and those with cardiac disease should likely not undergo a simultaneous bilateral procedure due to concerns about increased costs.     

Staging Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Procedures Within 90 Days Increases Costs in Bundled Payment Programs

BackgroundUnder current Medicare bundled payment programs, when a patient undergoes a subsequent elective procedure within the 90-day episode-of-care, the first procedure is excluded from the bundle and a new episode-of-care initiated. The purpose of this study was to determine if staging bilateral total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures within 90 days have an effect on bundled episode-of-care costs.MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of Medicare patients undergoing staged primary THA and TKA from 2015-2019. Patients who underwent a prior procedure within 90 days were compared to those who had undergone a procedure 90-120 days prior. We then performed a multivariate analysis to identify the independent effect of staging timeframe on costs and outcomes.ResultsOf the 136 patients undergoing a staged bilateral THA or TKA, 48 patients underwent staged procedures within 90 days (35%) and 88 patients between 91-120 days (65%). There were no significant differences observed for demographics, comorbidities, complications, readmissions, or discharge disposition (all P > .05). Patients undergoing a staged procedure within 90 days had increased episode-of-care costs by $2021 (95% CI $11-$4032, P = .049), increased postacute care costs by $2019 (95% CI $66-$3971, P < .001), and reduced per-patient margin by $2868 (95% CI-$866-$4869, P = .005).DiscussionPatients undergoing staged bilateral THA or TKA within 90 days have increased episode-of-care costs compared to those undergoing a staged procedure from 91-120 days. Since patients may still not be fully recovered from the first procedure, CMS should address the inappropriate allocation of costs to ensure institutions are not penalized.     

An Analysis of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service Payment in Maryland: Can a Global Budget Revenue Model Save Money in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty?

Background

Maryland is the only state utilizing the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) model to reduce costs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the GBR payment model effectively reduced the following: (1) costs of inpatient hospital stays; (2) post-acute care costs; (3) lengths of stay (LOS); (4) readmission rates; and (5) discharge disposition in patients who underwent primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA).

Patterns and Costs of 90-Day Readmission for Surgical and Medical Complications Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundUnplanned readmissions following elective total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty as a result of surgical complications likely have different quality improvement targets and cost implications than those for nonsurgical readmissions. We compared payments, timing, and location of unplanned readmissions with Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-defined surgical complications to readmissions without such complications.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis on unplanned readmissions within 90 days of discharge following elective primary THA/TKA among Medicare patients discharged between April 2013 and March 2016. We categorized unplanned readmissions into groups with and without CMS-defined complications. We compared the location, timing, and payments for unplanned readmissions between both readmission categories.ResultsAmong THA (N = 23,231) and TKA (N = 43,655) patients with unplanned 90-day readmissions, 27.1% (n = 6307) and 16.4% (n = 7173) had CMS-defined surgical complications, respectively. These readmissions with surgical complications were most commonly at the hospital of index procedure (THA: 84%; TKA: 80%) and within 30 days postdischarge (THA: 73%; TKA: 77%). In comparison, it was significantly less likely for patients without CMS-defined surgical complications to be rehospitalized at the index hospital (THA: 63%; TKA: 63%; P < .001) or within 30 days of discharge (THA: 58%; TKA: 59%; P < .001). Generally, payments associated with 90-day readmissions were higher for THA and TKA patients with CMS-defined complications than without (P < .001 for all).ConclusionReadmissions associated with surgical complications following THA and TKA are more likely to occur at the hospital of index surgery, within 30 days of discharge, and cost more than readmissions without CMS-defined surgical complications, yet they account for only 1 in 5 readmissions.     

Is the New Outpatient Prospective Payment System Classification for Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty Appropriate?

BackgroundIn 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the inpatient-only list, resulting in payment through the Outpatient Prospective Payment System with an average $3157 reduction. The purpose of this study is to determine if the reimbursement is justified by comparing the difference in facility costs between inpatient and outpatient TKAs.MethodsWe identified 4496 consecutive primary TKA procedures performed at 2 hospitals from 2015 to 2019. Itemized facility costs were calculated using a time-driven activity-based costing algorithm. Outpatient procedures were defined as those with a length of stay of less than 2 midnights (3851, 86%). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and itemized costs were compared between groups. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the independent effect of outpatient status on true facility costs.ResultsOutpatient TKA patients had lower mean postoperative personnel costs ($1809 vs $947, P < .001), supply costs ($4347 vs $4229, P < .001), and overall total facility costs ($7371 vs $6937, P < .001) than inpatient TKA patients. Controlling for a younger patient cohort with fewer medical comorbidities, outpatient status was associated with a reduction in total facility costs of $972 (95% confidence interval $883-$1060, P < .001) compared to inpatient TKA.ConclusionOutpatient TKA costs hospitals nearly $1000 per patient less than inpatient TKA, yet the average difference in Medicare reimbursement for an outpatient procedure is $3157 less per patient. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should reconsider the Outpatient Prospective Payment System classification of TKA to better incentivize surgeons to perform TKA as a lower cost outpatient procedure when safe and appropriate.     

A Novel,Synergistic Model in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Report of 2 Specialty Hospitals With Joint Ownership Between Physicians and Healthcare Systems

BackgroundIn 2010, the Affordable Care Act introduced new restrictions on the expansion of physician-owned hospitals (POHs) due to concerns over financial incentives and increased costs. The purpose of this study is to determine whether joint ventures between tertiary care and specialty hospitals (SHs) allowing physician ownership (POHs) have improved outcomes and lower cost following THA and TKA.MethodsAfter institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of consecutive series of primary THA and TKA patients from 2015 to 2016 across a single institution comprised of 14 full-service hospitals and 2 SHs owned as a joint venture between physicians and their health system partners. Ninety-day episode-of-care claims cost data from Medicare and a single private insurer were reviewed with the collection of the same demographic data, medical comorbidities, and readmission rates for both the SHs and non-SHs. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the independent effect of the SHs on episode-of-care costs.ResultsOf the 6537 patients in the study, 1936 patients underwent a total joint arthroplasty at an SH (29.6%). Patients undergoing a procedure at an SH had shorter lengths of stay (1.29 days vs 2.23 days for Medicare, 1.15 vs 1.86 for private payer, both P < .001), were less likely to be readmitted (4% vs 7% for Medicare, P = .001), and had lower mean 90-day episode-of-care costs ($16,661 vs $20,579 for Medicare, $26,166 vs $35,222 for private payers, both P < .001). When controlling for the medical comorbidities and demographic variables, undergoing THA or TKA at an SH was associated with a decrease in overall episode costs ($3266 for Medicare, $13,132 for private payer, both P < .001).ConclusionEven after adjusting for a healthier patient population, the joint venture partnership with health systems and physician-owned SHs demonstrated lower 90-day episode-of-care costs than non-SHs following THA and TKA. Policymakers and practices should consider these data when considering the current care pathways.     

The Economics of Antibiotic Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Added Cost with No Reduction in Infection Rates

BackgroundTo reduce the substantial clinical and financial burden of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), some surgeons advocate for the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), although its effectiveness continues to be debated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the routine use of ALBC is cost-effective in reducing PJI after primary TKA.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients undergoing cemented primary TKA at two hospitals within our institution from 2015 to 2017. We compared demographics, comorbidities, costs, and PJI rates between patients receiving ALBC and plain cement. We performed a multivariate regression analysis to determine the independent effect of ALBC on PJI rate. We calculated readmission costs for PJI and reduction in PJI needed to justify the added cost of ALBC.ResultsOf 2511 patients, 1077 underwent TKA with ALBC (43%), with no difference in PJI rates (0.56% vs 0.14%, P = .0662) or complications (1.2% vs 1.6%, P = .3968) but higher cement costs ($416 vs $117, P < .0001) and overall procedure costs ($6445 vs $5.968, P < .0001). ALBC had no effect on infection rate (P = .0894). Patients readmitted with PJI had higher overall 90-day episode-of-care claims costs ($49,341 vs $19,032, P < .001). To justify additional costs, ALBC would need to prevent infection in one of every 101 patients.ConclusionRoutine use of ALBC in primary TKA is not cost-effective, adding $299 to the cost of episode of care without a reduction in PJI rate. Further study is needed to determine whether select use of ALBC would be justified in high-risk patients.     

Formal Physical Therapy Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Incurs Additional Cost Without Improving Outcomes

BackgroundRecent evidence has demonstrated that formal physical therapy (PT) may not be required for most patients undergoing total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. This study compared the differences in costs and functional outcomes in patients receiving formal PT and those who did not follow primary THA and TKA.MethodsWe queried claims data from a single private insurer identifying patients who underwent primary THA or TKA from 2015 to 2017 in our practice. Demographics, comorbidities, number, and cost of PT visits in a 90-day episode of care were recorded. Outcomes were compared between patients using self-directed home exercises, home PT, outpatient PT, or both home and outpatient PT. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of outcomes.ResultsOf the 2971 patients included in analysis, patients using both services had higher 90-day PT costs (mean $2091, P < .001) than those using home PT alone ($1146), outpatient PT alone ($1356), or no formal PT ($0). Home PT had the greatest cost per visit for both private insurance patients ($177/visit) and Medicare Advantage patients ($157/visit), but patients using both home PT and outpatient PT services had the greatest overall PT cost, $2091 for private insurance and $1891 for Medicare Advantage. Patients who used home PT were at significantly higher risk of both complications (odds ratio = 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-4.9; P < .001) and readmissions (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.5; P < .001).ConclusionParticipation in formal PT accounts for up to 8% of the episode of care following THA and TKA. The role of formal PT for most patients should take into account the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.     

The Importance of Oral History: Does Dental Implant Placement or Caries One Year Before or After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Increase Medical Complications and Periprosthetic Joint Infections?

BackgroundConsensus regarding prior dental problems on the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients is lacking. Therefore, our objectives were to determine the association of dental caries or dental implant placement in TKA patients on the following: (1) medical complications; (2) health care utilization (lengths of stay and readmissions); (3) implant-related complications; and (4) expenditures.MethodsA retrospective query was performed using an administrative claims database for 3 patient cohorts undergoing primary TKA from 2010 to 2020. Patients who had a history of dental caries or implant placement 1 year prior to TKA (n = 1,466) and 1 year after TKA (n = 1,127) were case-matched to patients who did not have a dental history by age and comorbidities. Outcomes included 90-day complications, health care utilization parameters, 2-year implant complications, and expenditures. Logistic regression models computed odds ratios (OR) of complications and readmissions. P values less than 0.005 were significant.ResultsPatients who had a dental implant placement prior to TKA had higher frequency of complications (20.05 versus 14.01%; OR: 1.53, P < .0001), including myocardial infarctions (2.52 versus 1.23%; OR: 2.08, P = .0002) and pneumonia (2.52 versus 1.24%; OR: 2.06, P = .0002). Lengths of stay (3.28 versus 2.98 days; P = .255), readmission rates (4.71 versus 4.28%; P = .470), and implant-related complications including periprosthetic joint infections (3.14 versus 2.63%; OR: 1.20, P = .279) were similar between patients lacking dental history. Expenditures were higher in patients who had a postoperative and preoperative dental history ($19,252 versus $19,363 versus 17,980; P < .001).ConclusionDental caries or implant placement may reflect overall worse medical condition resulting in more complications and higher costs after TKA. Dental history screening preoperatively may assist arthroplasty surgeons in minimizing complications.     

Can Prior Episode-of-Care Costs Predict the Future? Identifying High-Cost Outliers for Subsequent Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundIt remains unknown if a patient’s prior episode-of-care (EOC) costs for total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty procedure can be used to predict subsequent costs for future procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether there is a correlation between the EOC costs for a patient’s index and subsequent THA or TKA.MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of 11,599 THA and TKA Medicare patients from 2015 to 2019 and identified all patients who underwent a subsequent THA and TKA during the study period. We collected demographics, comorbidities, short-term outcomes, and 90-day EOC claims costs. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify whether prior high-EOC costs were predictive of high costs for the subsequent procedure.ResultsOf the 774 patients (6.7%) who underwent a subsequent THA or TKA, there was no difference in readmissions (4% vs 5%, P = .70), rate of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) (15% vs 15%, P = .89), and mean costs ($18,534 vs $18,532, P = .99) between EOCs. High-cost patients for the initial TKA or THA were more likely to be high cost for subsequent procedure (odds ratio 14.33, P < .01). Repeat high-cost patients were more likely to discharge to an SNF for their first and second EOC compared to normative-cost patients (P < .01).ConclusionHigh-cost patients for their initial THA or TKA are likely to be high cost for a subsequent procedure, secondary to a high rate of SNF utilization. Efforts to reduce costs in repeat high-cost patients should focus on addressing post-operative needs pre-operatively to facilitate safe discharge home.     

Life After BPCI: High Quality Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Care Can Still Exist Outside of a Bundled Payment Program

BackgroundConcerns regarding target price methodology and financial penalties have led to withdrawal from Medicare bundled payment programs for total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), despite its early successful results. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any difference in patient comorbidities and outcomes following our institution’s exit from the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement - Advanced (BPCI-A).MethodsWe reviewed consecutive 2,737 primary TKA and 2,009 primary THA patients following our withdraw from BPCI-A January 1, 2020-March 30, 2021 and compared them to 1,203 TKA and 1,088 THA patients from October 1, 2018-August 2, 2019 enrolled in BPCI-A. We compared patient demographics, comorbidities, discharge disposition, complications, and 90-day readmissions.Multivariate analysis was performed to identify if bundle participation was associated with complications or readmissions.ResultsPost-bundle TKA had shorter length of stay (1.4 vs 1.8 days, P < .001). Both TKA and THA patients were significantly less likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility (5.6% vs 19.2%, P < .001 and 6.0% vs 10.0%, P < .001, respectively). Controlling for confounders, post-bundle TKA had lower complications (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.98, P = .037) but no difference in 90-day readmission (OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.55-1.16, P = .224).ConclusionsSince leaving BPCI-A, we have maintained high quality THA care and improved TKA care with reduced complications and length of stay under a fee-for-service model. Furthermore, we have lowered rehabilitation discharge for both TKA and THA patients. CMS should consider partnering with high performing institutions to develop new models for risk sharing.     

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Era of Bundled Care Payments: Impacts on Costs of Care

BackgroundConversion hip arthroplasty is defined as a patient who has had prior open or arthroscopic hip surgery with or without retained hardware that is removed and replaced with arthroplasty components. Currently, it is classified under the same diagnosis-related group as primary total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, it frequently requires a higher cost of care.MethodsA retrospective study of 228 conversion THA procedures in an orthopaedic specialty hospital was performed. Propensity score matching was used to compare the study group to a cohort of 510 primary THA patients by age, body mass index, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. These matched groups were compared based on total costs, implants used, operative times, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and complications.ResultsConversion THA incurred 25% more mean total costs compared to primary THA (P < .05), longer lengths of surgery (154 versus 122 minutes), and hospital LOS (2.1 versus 1.56 days). A subgroup analysis showed a 57% increased cost for cephalomedullary nail conversion, 34% increased cost for sliding hip screw, 33% for acetabular open reduction and internal fixation conversion, and 10% increased costs in closed reduction and percutaneous pinning conversions (all P < .05). There were 5 intraoperative complications in the conversion group versus none in the primary THA group (P < .01), with no statistically significant difference in readmissions.ConclusionConversion THA is significantly more costly than primary THA and has longer surgical times and greater LOS. Specifically, conversion THA with retained implants had the greatest impact on cost.     

Is Conversion TKA a Primary or Revision? Clinical Course and Complication Risks Approximating Revision TKA Rather Than Primary TKA

BackgroundConversion total knee arthroplasty (convTKA) is associated with increased resource utilization and costs compared with primary TKA. The purpose of this study is to compare 1) surgical time, 2) hospitalization length (LOS), 3) complications, 4) infection, and 5) readmissions in patients undergoing convTKA to both primary TKA and revision TKA patients.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2008 to 2018. Patients undergoing convTKA (n = 1,665, 0.5%) were defined by selecting Current Procedural Terminology codes 27,447 and 20,680. We compared the outcomes of interest to patients undergoing primary TKA (n = 348,624) and to patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA (n = 8213). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the relative risk of postoperative complications.ResultsCompared with patients undergoing primary TKA, convTKA patients were younger (P < .001), had lower body mass index (P < .001), and were less likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologist class III/IV (P < .001). These patients had significantly longer operative times (122.6 vs 90.3 min, P < .001), increased LOS (P < .001), increased risks for any complication (OR 1.94), surgical site infection (OR 1.84), reoperation (OR 2.18), and readmissions (OR 1.60) after controlling for confounders. Compared with aseptic TKA revisions, operative times were shorter (122.6 vs 148.2 min, P < .001), but LOS (2.91 vs 2.95 days, P = .698) was similar. Furthermore, relative risk for any complication (P = .350), surgical site infection (P = .964), reoperation (P = .296), and readmissions (P = .844) did not differ.ConclusionConversion TKA procedures share more similarities with revision TKA rather than primary TKA procedures. Without a distinct procedural and diagnosis-related group, there are financial disincentives to care for these complex patients.Level of EvidenceII.     

Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prior Fracture or Osteotomy Around the Knee Leads to Increased Resource Utilization

BackgroundPrior knee surgery before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) puts patients at higher risk of inferior outcomes and increased care cost. This study compares intraoperative and postoperative variables including procedure duration, components, length of stay, readmission, complications, and reoperations among patients undergoing conversion TKA.MethodsPrimary TKA from a single-surgeon database identified 130 patients with prior knee surgery to form a “conversion” cohort. One-to-one matching identified 130 patients of similar age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and gender without prior knee surgery for comparison. Perioperative and 90-day postoperative variables were compared between patients with and without prior surgery, within the conversion group based on the type of prior surgery, and whether the prior surgery was bony or soft tissue.ResultsThe conversion group had longer mean operative time (96.1 vs 90.0 minutes, P = .01), higher revision component utilization (8.5% vs 0.8%, P = .005), and higher calculated blood loss (1440 vs 1249 mL, P = .004). Thirty-eight patients with prior fracture or osteotomy were compared to the remaining 92 patients in the conversion group and showed longer operative time (107.1 vs 91.3 minutes, P < .001), higher 90-day readmissions (18.4% vs 3.3%, P = .003), more complications (23.7% vs 8.7%, P = .021), and greater utilization of revision components (26.3% vs 1.1%, P < .001).ConclusionPatients undergoing conversion TKA required increased resource utilization, particularly patients with a prior osteotomy or fracture. Policymakers should consider these variables, as they did in conversion THA, in adding a code to account for increased case complexity and resource utilization.