Xp11.2 translocation renal neoplasm with features of TFE3 rearrangement associated renal cell carcinoma and Xp11 translocation renal mesenchymal tumor with melanocytic differentiation harboring NONO-TFE3 fusion gene

Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and Xp11 translocation renal mesenchymal tumor are distinct tumor entity. To broaden the spectrum of Xp11 neoplasms, we investigated a novel tumor exhibiting morphologies overlapping Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 rearrangement-associated RCC and the mesenchymal counterpart with melanocytic differentiation by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and RNA sequencing, as well as literature review. Histologically, the tumor was composed of three different types of tumor cells, including a large proportion of clear cells, small round cells, and a few spindle cells, presenting a relatively clear border in the majority area. The nuclei of all tumor cells showed extensively and strong positive expressions of TFE3. Whereas, the clear cells positively expressed the RCC-related markers including PAX8, RCC marker and CD10, and negatively expressed HMB45; On the contrary, the small round cells and spindle cells positively expressed melanocytic marker HMB45, and negatively expressed PAX8, RCC marker and CD10. The ki67 index was higher in the small round cells and spindle cells than that in the clear cells. FISH revealed the rearrangement of TFE3 gene in all the three types of cells. The NONO-TFE3 fusion gene was detected in all tumor cells by RNA sequencing. This unique Xp11 translocation-associated neoplasm might represent a distinct entity overlapping Xp11 translocation RCC and the mesenchymal counterpart with melanocytic differentiation, broadening the spectrum of Xp11 neoplasms. The patient died of tumor recurrence and lung metastasis after seven months after the surgery suggesting those tumors have an unfavorable prognosis.     

Gene fusion analysis in renal cell carcinoma by FusionPlex RNA‐sequencing and correlations of molecular findings with clinicopathological features

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) affects younger patients and often presents as advanced disease. Accurate diagnosis is required to guide clinical management. Here we evaluate the RNA‐sequencing FusionPlex platform with a 115‐gene panel including TFE3 and TFEB for tRCC diagnosis and correlate molecular findings with clinicopathological features. We reviewed 996 consecutive RCC cases from our institution over the preceding 7 years and retrieved 17 cases with histological and immunohistochemical features highly suggestive of either TFE3 (n = 16) or TFEB (n = 1). Moderate to strong labeling for TFE3 was present in 15 cases; two cases with weak TFE3 expression were melan‐A or cathepsin‐K positive. RNA‐sequencing detected gene rearrangements in eight cases: PRCC‐TFE3 (3), ASPSCR1‐TFE3 (2), LUC7L3‐TFE3 (1), SFPQ‐TFE3 (1), and a novel SETD1B‐TFE3 (1). FISH assays of 11 tumors verified six positive cases concordant with FusionPlex analysis results. Two other cases were confirmed by RT‐PCR. FusionPlex was superior to FISH by providing precise breakpoints for tRCC‐related genes in a single assay and allowing identification of both known and novel fusion partners, thereby facilitating clinicopathological correlations as fusion partners can influence tumor appearance, immunophenotype, and behavior. Cases with partner genes PRCC and novel partner SETD1B were associated with prominent papillary architecture while cases with partner genes ASPSCR1 and LUC7L3 were associated with a predominantly nested/alveolar pattern. The case with SFPQ‐TFE3 fusion was characterized by biphasic morphology mimicking TFEB‐like translocation RCC. We recommend FusionPlex analysis of RCC in patients under age 50 or when the histologic appearance suggests tRCC.     

The role of CD5 expression in thymic carcinoma: possible mechanism for interaction with CD5+ lymphoid stroma (microenvironment)

Recently, an increasing number of TFE3 rearrangement‐associated tumours have been reported, such as TFE3 rearrangement‐associated perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas), melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancers and melanotic Xp11 neoplasms. We have suggested that these tumours belong to a single clinicopathological spectrum. ‘Xp11 neoplasm with melanocytic differentiation’ or ‘melanotic Xp11 neoplasm’ have been proposed to designate this unique neoplasm. Herein, we describe the first case of an Xp11 neoplasm with melanocytic differentiation to be described in the prostate, bearing the novel NONO–TFE3 gene fusion. This study both adds to the spectrum regarding melanotic Xp11 neoplasms and expands its gene fusion spectrum. Moreover, we discuss the relationship of these rare tumours to neoplasms such as conventional PEComas, alveolar soft part sarcomas, malignant melanomas, clear cell sarcomas and Xp11 translocation renal cancers.     

A novel RBMX‐TFE3 gene fusion in a highly aggressive pediatric renal perivascular epithelioid cell tumor

We report an Xp11 translocation perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) with a novel RBMX‐TFE3 gene fusion, resulting from a paracentric X chromosome inversion, inv(X)(p11;q26). The neoplasm occurred in an otherwise healthy 12‐year‐old boy who presented with a large left renal mass with extension into the inferior vena cava. The patient was found to have multiple pulmonary metastases at diagnosis and died of disease 3 months later. The morphology (epithelioid clear cells with alveolar and nested architecture) and immunophenotype (TFE3 and HMB45 strongly positive; actin, desmin, and PAX8 negative) was typical of an Xp11 translocation PEComa; however, TFE3 rearrangement was initially not detected by routine TFE3 break‐apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Further RNA sequencing revealed a novel RBMX‐TFE3 gene fusion, which was subsequently confirmed by fusion assay FISH, using custom design RBMX and TFE3 come‐together probes. This report describes a novel TFE3 gene fusion partner, RBMX, in a pediatric renal PEComa patient associated with a fulminant clinical course. As documented in other intrachromosomal Xp11.2 inversions, such as fusions with NONO, RBM10, or GRIPAP1 genes, the TFE3 break‐apart might be below the FISH resolution, resulting in a false negative result.     

An adult case of melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancers: distinct entity or sub-entity?

Melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancer is a recently recognized aggressive epithelioid neoplasm with features overlapping between PEComa, carcinoma, and melanoma, in which TFE3 gene fusions coexist with melanin synthesis. These findings support the idea that melanotic Xp11 translocation renal cancer is a distinct variant of the MiT/TFE3 family neoplasms. The authors describe a pigmented renal tumor occurring in a 30-year-old woman with distinct morphology and immunohistochemical characteristics as Xp11 translocation renal cancer.     

Renal cancer associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion: Clinicopathological analysis of 13 cases

ObjectiveTo explore the clinicopathological characteristics, immunohistochemical phenotype, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion.MethodsThe clinical history, pathological morphology, immunohistochemical phenotype and related molecular test results of 13 cases of Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion-related renal cell carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed, and the relevant literature was reviewed.ResultsOf the 13 patients, 5 were males and 8 were females. The age of onset ranges from 8 to 73 years old, most of which were middle-aged and elderly patients. Among them, there were 3 cases of left kidney tumor and 10 cases of right kidney tumor. In the treatment method, 2 of the 13 patients underwent partial nephrectomy, and 11 underwent radical nephrectomy. Histopathological morphology showed papillary, nested, tubular and acinar structures. The cytoplasm was transparent or eosinophilic, and the interstitial fibrosis was accompanied by chronic inflammatory cell infiltration, hemosiderin deposition and foam cell aggregation. The immunohistochemical analysis of 13 patient specimens all expressed TFE3 antibody, and the expression intensity was strongly positive; gene FISH detection technology revealed the breakage and rearrangement of TFE3 gene in 12 assessable cases. One of thirteen patients had a metastasis at follow-up from 3 to 69 months.ConclusionsThis type of kidney cancer was a rare subtype. Because of its complex and changeable shape, it has a high degree of overlap with other kidney cancer subtypes, and the missed diagnosis rate and misdiagnosis rate are extremely high. The diagnosis is mainly based on pathomorphology and immunohistochemistry, TFE3 positive expression and TFE3 gene destruction and rearrangement.     

Pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion: a clue for tumor enucleation?

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of tumor enucleation (TE) for patients with small renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion (Xp11.2 RCC) by analyzing the pseudocapsule characteristics of Xp11.2 RCCs comparing with that of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Methods: From June 2007 to February 2014, 22 patients with Xp11.2 RCC who were diagnosed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization polyclonal (FISH) assay and 32 patients with ccRCC treated in our institution were comparatively studied. 12 patients with ccRCC underwent radical nephrectomy (RN) and 20 received TE. Among 22 patients with Xp11.2 RCC, 19 were treated by RN and 3 by TE (1 by radiofrequency ablation assisted TE). Pseudocapsule and other clinicopathological characteristics of the two subtypes of RCC were compared. Survival of patients treated with different surgical methods was evaluated and compared. Results: Pseudocapsule incidence of Xp11.2 RCC (14/22, 63.6%) was lower than that of ccRCC (32/32, 100%, P<0.001). However, pseudocapsule integrity rate of Xp11.2 RCC (10/14, 71.4%) was comparable with that of ccRCC (23/32, 71.9%, P=1.000). The 5-year overall survival of patients with ccRCC treated with RN and TE was 86% and 81%, respectively (P=0.845). Three patients with small Xp11.2 RCC performed well after TE. Conclusions: Over half Xp11.2 RCC had pseudocapsules, whose integrity rate was comparable to that of ccRCC. Treatment effectives of TE and RN were comparable in ccRCC. A preliminary attempt to treat small Xp11.2 RCC with intact pseudocapsule by using TE produced a favorable treatment outcome.     

Overexpression of cyclin D1, D3, and p21 in an infantile renal carcinoma with Xp11.2 TFE3-gene fusion

Renal carcinomas harboring the TFE-3 translocation are rare and occur predominately in children and adolescents. Here, we report a case of infantile renal carcinoma with TFE3 translocation and show that the cell cycle is deregulated in this type of carcinoma. It is characterized by nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1 and D3 in combination with high levels of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21Cip1/Waf1 but without accumulation of p53, p16INK4a, or mdm2. The combined overexpression of p21, cyclin D1, and cyclin D3 was found exclusively in this type but not in other, more common types of renal carcinoma/oncocytoma (n=27). These results further underscore that renal carcinomas with Xp11. 2 translocations/TFE3-gene fusion represent a special type of renal neoplasm showing deregulation of specific cell cycle components. The analysis of further cases has to prove whether the derangement of the cell cycle is uniform and correlates with the specific type of molecular genetic derangement.     

Xp11.2易位/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌的临床病理学特点

目的 探讨Xp11.2易位/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌的临床病理学特点.方法 对4例Xp11.2易位/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌进行临床资料分析、组织学观察和免疫组化研究,并复习相关文献.结果 4例患者年龄自6～20岁,均具有腰痛的症状和较高的临床分期.肿瘤最大径2.5～10 cm,切面灰黄间灰红色.组织学上,肿瘤显示乳头状和腺泡状2种生长方式, 间质可见钙化.肿瘤细胞界限清楚,胞质淡红染至透亮,染色质呈泡状,核仁易见.4例肿瘤均弥漫高表达TFE3和CD10,不同程度表达CK、EMA和vimentin.结论 Xp11.2易位/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌是最近被定义的一种罕见肿瘤,好发于年轻患者,预后较差.其诊断主要依靠特征性的组织病理学改变和免疫标记TFE3阳性.