High dose rate brachytherapy boost treatment in radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

The natural history of prostate cancer is for early invasion of the prostatic capsule and seminal vesicles. This will be present in the majority of patients presenting with a prostate specific antigen (PSA) >10 or Gleason score >7. In these patients a combination of external beam treatment to provide a regional dose of radiation followed by a high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy boost to enable conformal dose escalation within the prostate gland presents an attractive option in local treatment. Accurate placement of catheters is now possible using transrectal ultrasound to provide high quality implants. A number of centres have now developed this technique as a routine clinical tool. There remains variation in the optimal dose fractionation with a range of BED(10) values from 100 to 77 and BED(3) values from 246.6 to 122.5. This does not, however, take into account geometric variations in dose distribution exploiting the physical advantage of BT in achieving a rapid dose fall off close to critical structures such as the rectum. Early results show PSA response levels of around 90% with grade III toxicity in 5-9% of patients. Critical evaluation of this technique in prospective, randomized trials is required.     

High dose rate endobronchial brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: A phase-II study was planned to test the effect of external beam radiotherapy in combination with endobronchial brachytherapy on the local control and survival of stage-III non-small cell lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with stage-III non-small cell lung cancer have been treated with 60 Gy external beam radiotherapy and 3 x 5 Gy HDR endobronchial brachytherapy to control tumor and to prolong survival. RESULTS: Therapy regimen was found to be very effective for the palliation of major symptoms, palliation rates were 42.8% for cough, 95.2% for hemoptysis, 88.2% for chest pain and 80.0% for dyspnea. There was a 76.7% tumor response (53.3% complete, 23.3% partial) verified by chest CT scans and bronchoscopy. However, median locoregional disease free survival was 9+/-4 months (95% CI: 1-17) and it was only 9.6% at 5 years. Major side effects were radiation bronchitis (70.0%), esophagitis (6.6%) in the acute period and bronchial fibrosis (25%), esophagial fibrosis (12.5%) and fatal hemoptysis (10.5%) in the late period. Median survival was 11+/-4 months (95% CI: 4-18),and 5-year actuarial survival was 10%. Locoregional disease free survival (P=0.008) and the overall survival was longer (P<0.001) in the patients younger than 60, survival was also improved in the patients with complete response (P=0.019). There were no major complications during catheterisation; early side effects were quite tolerable but severe late complications were around 10%. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that endobronchial brachytherapy in combination with external irradiation provides a good rate of response, however does not eradicate locoregional disease and does not prolong survival except for some subgroups such as younger patients.     

192Ir low dose rate brachytherapy for boosting locally advanced prostate cancers after external beam radiotherapy: a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate on 201 locally advanced prostatic cancers prospectively treated in a phase II trial, the efficacy of a combination of external beam radiotherapy (39.6 Gy) and (192)Ir low dose rate brachytherapy (Bt) (40-45 Gy). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients were included in the intermediate prognosis group with only one of the following adverse factors (PSA > 10 ng/ml, Gleason score > or = 7 or clinical stage > or =T2b) and 137 in the unfavourable group when at least two of these factors were present. RESULTS: The actuarial 4 years biochemical no evidence of disease is 82.8% for the entire population. It is, respectively, 97 and 76% in the intermediate and unfavourable prognosis groups (P < 0.0001). Grade > or =3 late urinary complications occurred in 13 patients (6.5%). Eight patients (4%) presented late grade 2 rectal complications but no grades 3-5 was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Even if an alpha/beta of 1.5-3 Gy theoretically favours the use of a high dose rate mode of irradiation, the early results presented here are as good as those reported for similar groups of patients with high dose rate treatments. Late toxicity is identical but our urinary toxicity is within the less favourable and rectal toxicity within the most favourable results. We can postulate that while inducing very high hyperdosage regions (V150) mainly focused on the peripheral zone, most of the Bt techniques consist of a more ablative treatment. Many of the radiobiological studies on Bt did not in fact take into account the heterogeneity of irradiation inside the CTV. This study highlights the need to explore pulsed dose rate therapies, permanent implant and new available radioisotopes such as (169)Ytterbium that will offer the safety of low and lower dose rates. The actual late toxicity of the different Bt techniques is not yet inexistent indeed.     

Dosimetric predictors of biochemical control of prostate cancer in patients randomised to external beam radiotherapy with a boost of high dose rate brachytherapy

Background

To correlate dose and volume dosimetric parameters (D₉₀ and V₁₀₀) with biochemical control in advanced prostate cancer treated with high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT).

Methods

One hundred and eight patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to 35.75 Gy in 13 fractions followed by HDR-BT of 2 × 8.5 Gy. Kaplan–Meier freedom-from-biochemical relapse (FFbR; nadir + 2 μg/L) fits were grouped by the first (Q1), second (Q2) and third (Q3) D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ quartiles. Groups were compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Hazard Ratios (HR) for D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ and other co-variates (PSA, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were obtained using Cox’s proportional hazard model.

Results

FFbR was significantly higher in patients whose D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ were at or above the second and third quartile (log rank p ? 0·04). In multivariate analysis D₉₀, V₁₀₀ were significant covariates for risk of relapse.

Conclusions

Dichotomising the data using 6 levels of response (above and below Q1, Q2 and Q3) showed a progressive and continuous improvement in biochemical control of disease across the entire dose (and volume) range. The data show that a minimum D₉₀ of 108% of the prescribed dose should be the target to achieve.     

High dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Because the HDR brachytherapy treatments are delivered within minutes and on an outpatient basis, HDR brachytherapy is very well tolerated by patients and offers complete radiation safety. Published studies2, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 22, 24, 25 have shown high local clinical and biochemical control rates. Chronic complications have been acceptably low. Very low rates of urinary incontinence and high sexual potency rates have been reported. Gastrointestinal morbidity has been minimal. The development of Ir-192 HDR afterloading brachytherapy and refinements in the dosimetry have ushered in a new era in prostate brachytherapy. The control of the radiation dose and the ability to shape the radiation treatment envelope using a stepping source have allowed a giant step forward in radiation oncology technology. It is now possible to deliver tumoricidal doses of radiation conformally to the prostate while minimizing the dose to the bladder, urethra, and rectum. At present, HDR afterloaded brachytherapy is the optimal whole-organ and tumor-specific conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer.     

High dose rate iridium-192 brachytherapy as a component of radical radiotherapy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer

AimsTo assess the treatment outcomes and toxicity of conformal high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost as a means of radiation dose escalation in patients with localised prostate cancer.Materials and methodsBetween December 1998 and July 2004, 65 consecutive patients with localised prostate cancer (magnetic resonance imaging-staged T1–3 N0 M0) were treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by two fractions of HDR iridium-192 brachytherapy. The patients selected this treatment modality in preference to entering an ongoing randomised phase 3 trial. Any pre-treatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score were included. The primary end point was biochemical disease-free progression. Late treatment-related morbidity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria.ResultsThe median patient age was 67.3 years (range 47.9–80). Sixty patients (92.3%) had intermediate- to high-risk disease defined by clinical stage, presenting PSA and Gleason score/World Health Organisation (WHO) grade. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range 0.6–5.8), two patients had died of metastatic disease and another four patients had PSA relapse, giving a 3-year actuarial biochemical disease-free progression of 90.8%. Three patients (4.6%) had acute grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, in the form of urinary retention. Late grade 3 and 4 genitourinary toxicities occurred in four patients (6.2%) and one patient (1.5%), respectively. No late gastrointestinal toxicities were observed.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the combined modality of conformal HDR brachytherapy and EBRT is a feasible treatment modality with acceptable acute and late toxicities, comparable with those of EBRT alone. It offers an attractive conformal treatment modality with the potential of further dose escalation in the treatment of localised prostate cancer.     

High dose rate brachytherapy before external beam irradiation in inoperable oesophageal cancer.

To induce fast relief of dysphagia in patients with oesophageal cancer high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy was applied before external radiotherapy in a prospective study. Seventy-four patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer (36 squamous cell, 38 adenocarcinoma) were treated with a combination of 10 Gy HDR brachytherapy, followed by 40 Gy in 4 weeks external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), starting 2 weeks later. Tumour response, as measured by endoscopy and/or barium swallow, revealed complete remission in 21 and partial response in 38 patients (overall response rate 80%). Improvement of dysphagia was induced by brachytherapy within a few days in 39%, and achieved at the end of treatment in 70% of patients. Further weight loss was prevented in 39 of the 59 patients who presented with weight loss. Pain at presentation improved in 12 out of 25 patients. Median survival was 9 months. No differences in either response rate or survival were found in squamous cell or adenocarcinoma. Side-effects were either acute with minimal discomfort in 32 (42%) or late with painful ulceration in five patients (7%), occurring after a median of 4 months. A fistula developed in six patients, all with concurrent tumour. In conclusion, brachytherapy before EBRT was a safe and effective procedure to induce rapid relief of dysphagia, especially when combined with EBRT.     

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with external beam radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy.

Between August 1985 and September 1989, 62 patients with medically inoperable or surgically unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer were treated with both external beam radiotherapy and high dose rate bronchial brachytherapy. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy (5000-6000 cGy in 5-6 1/2 weeks) and weekly high dose rate bronchial brachytherapy (three to five fractions, 500 cGy at 1 cm from the source) delivered either concurrently or sequentially. Median survival for all patients was 13 months (m). Stage I and Stage IIIA-B patients had median survivals of 20 m and 10 m, respectively. Patients without nodal disease (No) had a significantly longer median survival compared to patients with regional node metastases (N1-3), 17 m versus 9 m. A total of 54 patients were evaluable for local tumor control analysis. Local tumor control was achieved in six of eight patients who had a normal pre-treatment radiograph. Patients with measurable tumor on the pre-treatment radiograph and negative regional nodes had local tumor control in eight of twenty-two (36%) cases. In patients with regional lymphadenopathy, loco-regional tumor control was achieved in four of eight cases. Additionally, there were sixteen patients with non-measurable tumor due to associated effusion, atelectasis and/or infiltrate. Four of these (25%) were considered to have local tumor control. Of 60 evaluable patients, there were nine occurrences of fatal hemorrhage, one of whom was disease-free (NED) at autopsy. The remaining eight patients had either clinical or pathological evidence of recurrent or persistent tumor. Patients who had follow up bronchoscopies were found to have varying degrees of concentric narrowing in the treated areas. One such patient had total lung collapse with no evidence of tumor. While this form of treatment may yield high local control rates in earlier stages, this study suggests the potential risk of fatal complication. Additional studies are warranted to further investigate the use of this modality in the treatment of lung cancer.     

External beam radiotherapy plus single-fraction high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) as a boost in patients (pts) with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer.

Methods and materials

From 2002 to July 2012, 377 pts with a diagnosis of intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer were treated with EBRT plus HDRB. Median patient age was 66 years (range, 41–86). Most patients (347 pts; 92%) were classified as high-risk (stage T2c–T3, or PSA > 20 ng/mL, or GS ? 8), with 30 patients (8%) considered intermediate risk. All patients underwent EBRT at a prescribed dose of 60.0 Gy (range, 45–70 Gy) to the prostate and seminal vesicles. A total of 120 pts (31%) received a dose of 46 Gy (45–50 Gy) to the true pelvis. All pts received a single-fraction 9 Gy (9–15 Gy) HDR boost. Most patients (353; 94%) were prescribed complete androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) rates were calculated. In the case of BRFS, patients with <26 months of follow-up (n = 106) were excluded to minimize the impact of ADT.

Results

The median follow-up for the entire sample was 50 months (range, 12–126), with 5-year actuarial OS and CSS, respectively, of 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84–92) and 98% (95% CI: 97–99). The 5-year BRFS was 91% (95% CI: 87–95) in the 271 pts with ?26 months (median, 60 months) of follow-up. Late toxicity included grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicity in 17 (4.6%) and 6 pts (1.6%), respectively, as well as grades 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicity in 46 (12.2%) and 3 pts (0.8%), respectively.

Conclusion

These long-term outcomes confirm that EBRT plus a single-fraction HDRB boost provides good results in treatment-related toxicity and biochemical control. In addition to the excellent clinical results, this fractionation schedule reduces physician workload, treatment-related expenses, patient discomfort and risks associated with anaesthesia. We believe these findings support the use of single-fractionation boost techniques.     

High-dose-rate intensity-modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: California endocurietherapy's 10-year results

PURPOSE: To present the long-term outcome and morbidity of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 1991 and December 1998, 209 consecutive patients with no prior androgen suppression were treated with HDR-BT plus EBRT. The median follow-up was 7.25 years (range, 5-12 years). The patients were stratified into three risk groups: low (Stage T2a or less, Gleason score 20). Four definitions of PSA progression were compared with the general clinical failure outcome: the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition, nadir plus 2.0 ng/mL, two consecutive rises >/=0.5 ng/mL, and PSA level >0.2 ng/mL. Morbidity was scored using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. RESULTS: The general clinical control rate was 90% (188 of 209), and the general clinical failure rate was 10% (21 of 209). The overall survival rate was 79%, and the cause-specific survival rate was 97%. The PSA progression-free survival (ASTRO definition) rate was 90%, 87%, and 69% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. The nadir plus 2 ng/mL and two rises >/=0.5 definitions correlated better with the actual clinical outcome than did the ASTRO and PSA >0.2 ng/mL definitions. The rate of Grade 3 and 4 late urinary morbidity was 6.7% and 1%, respectively, mostly occurring in patients who had undergone post-RT transurethral prostate resection. No late Grade 3 or 4 rectal morbidity developed. The sexual potency preservation rate was 67%. CONCLUSION: Our 10-year results have demonstrated HDR-BT plus EBRT is a proven treatment for all stages of localized prostate cancer. The morbidity was low, but post-RT transurethral resection should be avoided.     

Three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy versus the combination of external radiotherapy with high-dose rate brachytherapy in localized carcinoma of the prostate: comparison of acute toxicity

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy represents one of the basic therapeutic methods in treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate. Optimal irradiation dose is the cornerstone of a successful treatment. Along with local control of the disease and overall survival of the patient, possible acute and long-term side effects need to be monitored very closely. METHODS: A non-randomized prospective study comparing the acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity in patients irradiated for localized carcinoma of the prostate. Fifty-seven patients were treated with three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy alone, and in the second treatment arm a combination of external beam radiotherapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy was employed in 40 patients. RESULTS: Three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy. Acute G1 genitourinary toxicity was recorded in 35.1% of patients, G2 in 22.8%, and G2-3 in one patient (1.7%). Acute gastrointestinal toxicity was experienced by 54.4% of patients, G1 in 28.1%, G2 in 17.5%, and G3 in 8.8%. Three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy + brachytherapy. Acute G1 genitourinary toxicity was recorded in 37.5% and grade 2 in 15% of the patients. Only G1 acute gastrointestinal toxicity was recorded in 40% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Acute G1 genitourinary toxicity was experienced by a similar percentage of patients in both treatment arms. Acute G2 genitourinary toxicity was more frequent in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy arm. Higher acute genitourinary toxicity, G3 or G4, was recorded only in one patient per treatment arm. Acute gastrointestinal toxicity was more frequent in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy arm. Higher acute gastrointestinal toxicity, G2 and G3, was only observed in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy arm. The acute toxicity observed was of a low grade. The combination of external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy resulted in a lower incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity than external beam radiotherapy alone.     

Toxicity and health-related quality of life during and after high dose rate brachytherapy followed by external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal protocol for combining high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam irradiation as treatment for localized prostate cancer is unknown. Toxicity rates and clinical and biochemical outcomes should be evaluated to validate the current treatment protocol. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were treated for prostate cancer with high dose rate brachytherapy followed by 30 Gy of external beam radiation therapy. Toxicity during treatment and for 12-18 months thereafter, and treatment-related morbidity, were evaluated. Physician-assessed treatment-related toxicity was graded at the time of occurrence using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity criteria. Four separate self-administered questionnaires were used to collect longitudinally demographic data and general and prostate disease-related measures of quality of life. RESULTS: Various degrees of rectal bleeding due to radiation proctitis were experienced by 13 patients (22%) at a median time of 11 months. Two of these patients needed hospitalization to undergo laser coagulation of the rectal mucosa. Study patients had statistically significant decreases in five SF-36 domains during the first month of treatment. All measures recovered by 12 months. Sexual function was not affected by irradiation. Lower urinary tract symptoms assessed by IPSS/QOL scores worsened significantly during the first month of treatment but later recovered to baseline levels. Physician-assessed RTOG scores failed to detect these changes. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity associated with combined radiation therapy was greatest during the first month of treatment and affected quality of life significantly. Most measures recovered to baseline levels by 12 months following radiation therapy. Although the current protocol appears acceptable, measures should be taken to decrease treatment-related morbidity further.     

Failure free survival following brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer: comparison with external beam radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare failure free survival (FFS) for brachytherapy (BT) alone and external beam radiotherapy (EBXRT) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 12/88 and 12/95, 1527 and 695 T(1) or T(2) Nx-No Mo prostate cancer patients (from the Arizona Oncology Services database) were treated with either EBXRT or BT, respectively. The median age was 74 years. Median follow-up for EBXRT and BT patients was 41.3 and 51.3 months, respectively. RESULTS: Overall FFS at 5 years for EBXRT and BT were 69 and 71%, respectively (P=0.91). No significant difference in FFS at 5 years was observed between EBXRT and BT for either T(1) (78 vs. 83%, P=0.47) or T(2) (67 vs. 67%, P=0.89) tumours. Superior outcomes for Gleason 8-10 lesions treated with EBXRT vs. BT (5 years FFS 52 vs. 28%, P=0.04) were observed; outcomes for lower grade lesions when analysed by Gleason score alone did not significantly differ according to treatment received. Patients with initial PSA values 10-20 ng/dl had an improved FFS with EBXRT vs. BT (70 vs. 53%, P=0.001); outcomes for patients with initial PSA ranges 0-4 ng/dl, >4-10 ng/dl and >20 ng/dl did not differ significantly with treatment received. CONCLUSIONS: EBXRT and BT appear to be equally efficacious for low-risk patients having T(1)/T(2) disease with Gleason scores <6 and PSA <10 ng/dl. Patients with Gleason scores 8-10 or PSA >10 ng/dl-<20 ng/dl) appear to fare worse with BT alone compared with EBXRT. Neither EBXRT nor BT were particularly effective for patients with a presenting PSA >20 ng/dl.     

Results of high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy boost to conventional external beam radiation therapy for initial and locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact on biochemical control (bNED), acute and late gastro-intestinal (GI) and urological (GU) morbidity of initial and locally advanced prostate cancer treated with fractionated transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) high dose rate after loading brachytherapy (HDR-B) as a boost to conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1997 to February 2000 a total of 119 patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: biopsy proven adenocarcinoma Gleason scored (GS), initial prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level dosage 1992 AJCC clinical stage T3a or less, and prostatic volume <60 cc. All patients had prior to HDR-B a course of EBRT 6 MV photons to a median dose of 45 Gy, in 1.8 Gy fractions, to the prostate and seminal vesicles only. HDR-B treatment planning and dosimetric calculations were generated with the Nucletron Planning System. Patients were grouped into two groups, according to their risk for biochemical failure: low-risk group without (LR) or with neoadjuvant total androgen deprivation (AD) prior to EBRT (LR+AD) and high-risk group without (HR) or with neoadjuvant AD (HR+AD), for bNED and dose-escalation protocol. LR encompassed patients who presented GS<6, T1 or T2a and or initial PSA<10 ng/ml, who were treated with 16 Gy (4 Gy fractions, b.i.d.) HDR-B. The remaining patients were grouped into HR or HR+AD and received 20 Gy (5 Gy fractions, b.i.d.) HDR-B. The planning was optimized using the standard geometric optimization. Biological effective doses (BED) for tumor control and late responding tissue were calculated using a alpha/beta ratio of 1.5 and 3 Gy, respectively. They were matched with bNED, acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and urological (GU) morbidity, according to the RTOG/EORTC scoring criteria. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 68 years (range 47-83), with a median follow-up of 41 months (range 18-48). The crude and actuarial biochemical controls (bNED) in 48 months for all patients were 69.5 and 75.3%, respectively. When grouped into LR, LR+AD, HR and HR+AD the actuarial bNED were 78.2, 76, 76 and 72.3% (P=0.89), respectively. Acute GU and GI morbidity G1-2 were seen in 18.5% (20/108) and 10.2% (11/108) of patients with spontaneous regression. Late GI and GU morbidity G1-2 were seen in 12% (13/108) and 4.6 (5/108) of patients, with no need of intervention. No acute or late G3-4 GU or GI morbidity was seen. CONCLUSIONS: There are many advantages in HDR-B, but the most important ones are the capability of on-line dosimetry, quality control and the procedure being very conformal. There is a low incidence of GU and GI acute and late morbidity with acceptable bNED when treating initial and locally advanced prostate cancer with HDR-B as a boost to EBRT, but we still need to wait for results of phase III open trials that analyze HDR-B and conformal therapy.     

Treatment of localized prostate cancer using a combination of high dose rate Iridium‐192 brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: Initial Australian experience

Combination high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) and external beam radiation therapy is technically and clinically feasible as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. We report the first large Australian experience using this technique of radiation dose escalation in 82 patients with intermediate‐ and high‐risk disease. With a median follow up of 3 years (156 weeks), complications were low and overall prostate‐specific antigen progression‐free survival was 91% using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. The delivery of hypofractionated radiation through the HDRB component shortens overall treatment time and is both biologically and logistically advantageous. As a radiation boost strategy, HDRB is easy to learn and could be introduced into most facilities with brachytherapy capability.     

Long-term outcomes of intraluminal brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of combining high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC).

Methods

From 1992 to 2002, 87 patients with T1N0M0 thoracic esophageal cancer received IBT in combination with EBRT. Of these, 44 had mucosal cancer and 43 had submucosal cancer. For patients with tumor invasion within the lamina propria mucosa, IBT alone was performed (n?=?27). IBT boost following EBRT was performed for patients with tumor invasion in the muscularis mucosa or deeper (n?=?60). No patient received chemotherapy.

Results

The median follow-up time was 94?months. For mucosal cancer, the 5-year locoregional control (LRC), cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 75, 97 and 84%, respectively, and 49, 55 and 31%, respectively, for submucosal cancer. Tumor depth was a significant factor associated with LRC (p?=?0.02), CSS (p?<?0.001) and OS (p?<?0.001) by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor depth was the only significant predictor for OS (p?=?0.003). Late toxicities of grade 3 or higher in esophagus, pneumonitis, pleural effusion and pericardial effusion were observed in 5, 0, 0 and 1 patients, respectively. Grade ??3 events of cardiac ischemia and heart failure after radiotherapy were observed in 9 patients, and history of heart disease before radiotherapy was the only significant factor (p?=?0.002).

Conclusion

There was a clear difference in outcomes of IBT combined with EBRT between mucosal and submucosal esophageal cancers. More intensive treatment should be considered for submucosal cancer.