Automated peritoneal dialysis: a Spanish multicentre study

Background: A prospective sequential study on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and three techniques of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) was conducted to assess peritoneal clearances, the influence of peritoneal permeability on nocturnal APD clearances and the suitability of the peritoneal equilibration test (PET) for predicting clearances on APD. Methods: After performing a PET, a series of clinical, biochemical and dialysis adequacy markers were evaluated after 2 months on CAPD, continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) and tidal volume peritoneal dialysis (TPD) with 50% and 25% tidal volumes. Forty five patients participated and 33 completed the study. Results: Serum urea and creatinine decreased significantly whereas haemoglobin and glucose increased. Mean peritoneal urea clearance (1/week) was 55.40±8.76 on CAPD, 74.82±12.62 on CCPD, 69.20±14.63 on TPD (tidal 50%) and 66.89±13.23 on TPD (tidal 25%); mean creatinine clearance (1/week/1.73 m²) was 42.80±9.95, 52.19±11.11, 51.31±13.3 and 49.17±11.83 respectively. Both clearances were significantly lower on CAPD than on APD (<0.001). CCPD was the automated technique that provided the best nocturnal urea clearance (P<0.01). Nocturnal creatinine clearance did not show significant differences between CCPD and TPD (tidal 50%), being better with both techniques than with TPD (tidal 25%). There were statistically significant differences between nocturnal dialysate to plasma (D/P) ratios and those corresponding to the nearest times in the PET. The urea D/P ratio at 180 min and the creatinine D/P ratio at 240 min of the PET were the parameters that better estimated nocturnal clearances on APD. Conclusions: This study confirms that TPD does not improve the results of CCPD. Significant differences between D/P ratios during actual nocturnal cycles and PETs were observed. Key words: automated peritoneal dialysis; CAPD; clearances; PET      

Adult and pediatric peritonitis rates in a home dialysis program: comparison of continuous ambulatory and continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis

We reviewed our 115-month experience with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) in adult and pediatric patients to determine whether there is a difference in the incidence of peritonitis between patients performing CAPD or CCPD. Peritonitis rates were similar in patients performing CAPD or CCPD in both the adult and pediatric age groups. The overall CAPD peritonitis rate was significantly lower in adult patients when compared with pediatric patients. There was no difference in peritonitis rates for CCPD between adult and pediatric patients. When the data are divided into 3-year subgroups, the incidence of peritonitis is significantly lower in adult patients undergoing either CAPD or CCPD when compared with pediatric patients during the years 1986 to 1988. There is significant improvement over time in the incidence of peritonitis in both adult and pediatric patients performing CCPD; similarly, there is a trend toward improvement in patients performing CAPD. Staphylococcus species organisms remain the most common bacterial cause of peritonitis, except in pediatric patients under the age of 2 years or with nephrostomies, where gram-negative rod infections were more common. Peritonitis resulted in discontinuation of peritoneal dialysis in a greater number of adult patients. These results suggest that the number of catheter manipulations is not important in determining the incidence of peritonitis. Pediatric patients are more likely than adult patients to develop peritonitis with either CAPD or CCPD. Adult patients are more likely than pediatric patients to discontinue peritoneal dialysis secondary to peritonitis.     

Continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis is associated with lower rates of catheter infections than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD), unlike continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), provides freedom from daytime exchanges and is associated with lower rates of peritonitis. However, catheter infection (CI) rates have not been reported for CCPD. Previous data suggested that a CAPD disconnect system (Y-set) was associated with lower rates of CI. These results suggested that patients on CCPD, which is also a disconnect system, might also have low CI rates. We evaluated our CCPD patients for infection rates and compared them with two groups of matched control CAPD patients, one using a spike system and one a Y-set disconnect system to evaluate this hypothesis. The CCPD patients had the lowest rates of CIs (0.5 episodes per year or one episode every 25 months), followed by the CAPD patients using the Y-set (0.8 episodes per year or one episode every 14 months). CAPD patients using the spike system had the highest rates of CIs (1.2 episodes per year or one episode every 10 months). Peritonitis rates followed the same pattern among the patient groups: CCPD, 0.3 episodes per year; CAPD, Y-set 0.5 episodes per year; CAPD, spike system 1.3 episodes per year. Our data suggest that disconnect systems, such as the CAPD Y-set and CCPD, reduce CIs, as well as peritonitis.     

Simultaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion and removal in catheter-related infections without interruption of peritoneal dialysis

Catheter-related infections result in high patient morbidity, the need for temporary haemodialysis, and high costs. These infections are the main cause of limited technique survival in peritoneal dialysis. We introduced a protocol for the simultaneous peritoneoscopic insertion and removal of peritoneal catheters in patients with catheter-related infections. Peritoneal dialysis was continued the day after surgery using low-volume dwells and a dry abdomen during the daytime. The dialysate leukocyte count had to be below 100/mm³ before exchanging catheters, which was performed under antibiotic therapy based on culture sensitivity. The old catheter was removed after the new catheter had been inserted in the opposite abdominal region. CAPD patients were switched to APD for 1 week, which made prolonged hospitalization necessary. Simultaneous catheter insertion and removal was performed 25 times in 22 patients on CCPD and 15 times in 14 patients on CAPD. In CCPD patients, peritoneal dialysis was restarted after 1.0+0.1 days in 24 cases. One patient had sufficient residual renal function and discontinued CCPD until day 10. In 10 CAPD patients (11 procedures) APD was started 1.3±0.2 days after the procedure with CPD beginning 7.1±0.6 days thereafter. Three CAPD patients preferred haemodialysis and restarted CAPD 10.0±2.1 days after surgery. One patient continued CAPD the day after surgery. In addition to minor complications (e.g. position-dependent outflow problems), dialysate leakage occurred in two patients. Two patients developed peritonitis within the first 30 days after surgery, one of which was procedure related. One patient had severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding 2 weeks after the procedure, which was not related to the catheter replacement. Ultimately, in 38 of 40 procedures the patients could successfully continue peritoneal dialysis. We conclude that simultaneous insertion and removal of a peritoneal dialysis catheter without interruption of peritoneal dialysis is a safe procedure in patients with catheter-related infections.     

Biocompatibility parameters in in-vitro simulated automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND: In peritoneal dialysis, the usage of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) has been steadily increased. As APD means larger volumes of solution and more frequent contact times with fresh dialysate, an additive negative impact on biocompatibility data, exceeding the known effect of conventional PD fluids, seems possible. For an in-vitro comparison of APD and CAPD, a new cell culture system has recently been established. METHODS: A double chamber cell culture system with human mesothelial cells on top of a permeable membrane and growth medium beyond was used for mimicking CAPD and APD. Reflecting the in vivo equilibration pattern, we compared an eight-hour CAPD with a CCPD setting, using a conventional PD solution. Cell viability was assessed with a MTT assay and cell function via constitutive and stimulated IL-6 release. CA125 was measured as a parameter of mesothelial cell integrity, and TGF-1beta was measured as an index of induction of fibrosis. RESULTS: Both the CAPD and the CCPD mode resulted in a significantly lower MTT assay and stimulated IL-6 release compared to growth medium. TGF-1beta and CA125 release did not differ between the PD modes and control. The CAPD and the CCPD mode itself did not differ with regard to MTT assay, IL-6 release, TGF-1beta and CA125 generation. CONCLUSION: From the in-vitro model imitating the acute exposure of mesothelial cells with conventional PD fluid in a CCPD and CAPD mode, there is no evidence that APD, due to the larger volumes of solution and more frequent contact times with fresh dialysate, has an acute, additive negative impact on biocompatibility parameters indicative for peritoneal host defense, mesothelial cell integrity and peritoneal fibrosis.     

Peritoneal defense in continuous ambulatory versus continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis.

Several centers have reported a lower rate of peritonitis among adult patients on continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) as compared to those undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Preliminary results of our ongoing prospective randomized study comparing CAPD-Y with CCPD also suggest a lower peritonitis incidence among CCPD-treated patients. To investigate whether the two dialysis regimens could result in differences in local host defense, we studied peritoneal macrophage (PMO) function and effluent opsonic activity in eight patients established on CAPD-Y matched with eight chronic CCPD patients. Since short and long dwell times are inherent to both dialysis modalities, and we previously found that dwell time has an impact on PMO function and effluent opsonic activity, patients were studied after both a short (4 hr) and a long (15 hr) dwell time. In both groups PMO phagocytic capacity increased significantly with dwell time (39 +/- 3.3% at 4 hr vs. 58 +/- 4.2% at 15 hr in CAPD patients, and 40 +/- 3.9 vs. 72 +/- 3.3% in CCPD patients; P less than 0.01), as did PMO peak chemiluminescence response (31 +/- 4.9 vs. 77 +/- 7.2 counts.min-1/10(4) cells in CAPD, and 22 +/- 3.9 vs. 109 +/- 21.2 counts.min-1/10(4) cells in CCPD; P less than 0.01) and effluent opsonic activity (41 +/- 7.6 vs. 73 +/- 5.8% in CAPD and 39 +/- 6.2 vs. 70 +/- 5.9% in CCPD; P less than 0.01). However, no significant difference was found in either variable between CAPD and CCPD patients when dwell times were equal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Hernias: a frequent complication in children treated with continuous peritoneal dialysis

The course of 93 children, treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) over a total of 1,819 months, was evaluated retrospectively regarding hernia development. Thirty-seven patients (40%) developed 60 hernias (one per 30 patient-months), of which 36 were ventral, 7 umbilical, 14 inguinal, and 3 scrotal. Hernia occurrence was inversely correlated to patient's age and duration of CAPD/CCPD. The rate of hernia development was highest within the first 3 months following initiation of CAPD/CCPD with a subsequent rapid decrease. The dialysate inflow volume was not related to hernia development. The only complication due to the presence of a hernia was one episode of incarceration of the small bowel that required immediate surgical intervention. Surgical repair was the treatment performed in 75% of the cases. The remaining hernias were managed with volume reduction, conversion from CAPD to CCPD, or discontinuation of the daytime dialysate dwell in patients undergoing CCPD. Our observations suggest that hernia development is a frequent complication in children treated with CAPD/CCPD.     

Experience with renal transplantation in children undergoing peritoneal dialysis (CAPD/CCPD)

For children with end-stage renal disease, renal transplantation is the ultimate goal because it offers the potential of maximum rehabilitation. In order to evaluate the infectious risk of renal transplantation in patients previously maintained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and/or continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD), we retrospectively evalauted the clinical course of 44 pediatric patients (mean age 12.0 +/- 5.7 [SD] years) who received 32 cadaver and 16 live-related donor renal grafts after being maintained on peritoneal dialysis for 756 patient-months (mean 17.1 +/- 11.5 months). In the posttransplant period, 25 patients (57%) required dialysis because of acute tubular necrosis or acute rejection. Peritonitis developed in five patients (11%) following transplantation; two were being dialyzed at the time. Exit-site and tunnel infections occurred in nine patients (20%). In all instances, antibiotic treatment and/or catheter removal was curative. Posttransplant ascites developed in 12 patients (27%) and was alleviated by catheter drainage. The catheters were left in situ at the time of transplantation and electively removed when stable graft function was present. The 1- and 2-year actuarial graft survival rate was 65% and 55%, respectively. One patient died in the immediate posttransplant period, which was unrelated to peritoneal dialysis. In conclusion, pediatric patients maintained on CAPD and/or CCPD can be safely transplanted. The potential infectious risks related to peritoneal dialysis can be managed with appropriate management of the catheter and prompt antibiotic therapy. The patient and graft survival rates are comparable to those with patients receiving hemodialysis prior to transplantation. There is no need to limit access to transplantation in children undergoing CAPD and/or CCPD.     

Hyperlipidemia in pediatric patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis

We evaluated serial measurements of serum lipid levels in 68 patients aged 12.6±4.7 years undergoing treatment with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis/continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CAPD/CCPD). Fasting mean levels of triglycerides (TG) and cholesterol (C) were elevated above the 95th percentile of published normal values by 102% and 19%, respectively, at the start of dialysis. Except for a shortterm decrease in TG levels at 6 and 9 months, no significant change in mean lipid levels was observed during a follow-up period of 2 years. At initiation of dialysis, elevated TG and C levels were present in 90% and 69% of the patients, respectively. The prevalence of hyperlipidemia (HL) varied between 63% and 88% (TG) and 61% and 93% (C), respectively, during the follow-up period. TG and C levels were not correlated with caloric intake (evaluated in 17 patients), serum albumin levels, treatment modality (CAPD or CCPD), a history of the nephrotic syndrome, or previous treatment with hemodialysis or transplantation. However, a significant inverse correlation was observed between age and serum lipids at the initiation of dialysis treatment and after 1 year (TG:r=–0.40; C:r=–0.44). Our data indicate a high prevalence of HL but no significant change of serum lipid levels during 2 years of treatment with CAPD/CCPD.     

Peritoneal kinetics in children undergoing continuous ambulatory/cycling peritoneal dialysis

We present a report on peritoneal kinetics in children undergoing continuous ambulatory/cycling peritoneal dialysis (CAPD/CCPD). The effect of long-term treatment with CAPD/CCPD, peritonitis episodes, and dialysate inflow volume on peritoneal kinetics in children was evaluated. Peritoneal kinetic studies (PKSs) were performed in 47 pediatric patients at different times following initiation of CAPD/CCPD. In 18 of these patients, PKSs were repeated up to four times with an unchanged dialysate inflow volume after up to 55 months of CAPD/CCPD treatment. The PKS consisted of a 120-minute dwell with a 1.5% dextrose dialysate solution. Peritoneal clearance, dialysance, and dialysate to plasma (D/P) concentration ratios were calculated after 30, 60, and 120 minutes. The results of the serial PKSs demonstrate stable peritoneal creatinine and urea-N clearance, dialysance or D/P concentration ratios. Furthermore, there was no adverse effect of 32 peritonitis episodes. Finally, inflow volumes correlated directly with clearances of creatinine (P less than .01), urea-N (P less than .001), and potassium (P less than .001), and there was an inverse relationship to the D/P concentration ratios of creatinine (P less than .01), urea-N (P less than .01), potassium (P less than .01), and uric acid (P less than .01). Thus, CAPD/CCPD is a useful and effective long-term treatment modality for pediatric patients. Maximal dialysate inflow volumes should be provided to enhance peritoneal kinetics.     

Reducing a peritoneal dialysis program's cost by changing from a vendor-provided to a program-provided system for general medical supplies: significant savings in CCPD

An examination of the costs associated with outpatient chronic peritoneal dialysis prompted us to investigate the charges for general medical supplies used by patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) in our hospital-owned, not-for-profit peritoneal dialysis program. The items used by patients to perform their dialysis exchanges and daily exit site care included 4 x 3 and 2 x 2 sterile gauze pads, antibacterial soap, masks, tape, and betadine swabsticks. The charges for these supplies when purchased from the dialysis vendor were compared with charges for the same items if purchased directly from hospital stores by the peritoneal dialysis program and then distributed to the patients. This initial analysis suggested a considerable savings if the peritoneal dialysis program provided the supplies. Based on this estimated savings, in July 1995, the peritoneal dialysis program changed from a vendor-provided to a program-provided system for general supplies used by CAPD and CCPD patients. This study examined the differences in charges expressed as $/patient-month for two periods: July 1994 to June 1995 (when all general medical supplies were provided by dialysis vendors directly to the CAPD and CCPD patients) and July 1995 to May 1996 (when the peritoneal dialysis program purchased general medical supplies from hospital stores and distributed these supplies directly to the patients). The median vendor charges for CAPD patients (n = 21 during 1994 to 1995 and n = 18 during 1995 to 1996) were not significantly different between the two periods. In fact, the charges were slightly higher during the 1995 to 1996 period ($1,264/patient-month v $1,193/patient-month during the vendor-provided period of July 1994 to June 1995, P = 0.67). The median vendor charges for patients on CCPD were significantly lower during the 1995 to 1996 period when the peritoneal dialysis program provided the general medical supplies used for CCPD ($1,110/patient-month v $1,389/patient-month during 1994 to 1995, P = 0.003). There were 30 CCPD patients during the 1994 to 1995 period and 27 patients on CCPD during 1995 to 1996. The total charges for CAPD and CCPD patients combined included dialysis vendor charges (dialysis solution, tubing, cycler rental) and charges from hospital stores. These total charges were lower in the July 1995 to May 1996 period when general medical supplies were purchased directly from hospital stores rather than from the dialysis vendors: $1,201/patient-month versus $1,360/patient-month (P = 0.03). The median hospital store charges rose slightly during the July 1995 to May 1996 period when supplies were purchased by the peritoneal dialysis program from hospital stores ($31/patient-month v $21/patient-month, P = 0.37, during the July 1994 to June 1995 period when general medical supplies were purchased directly from dialysis vendors). However, despite the rise in charges from hospital stores, an overall savings of $149/patient-month was achieved when the peritoneal dialysis program purchased and provided general medical supplies used by the peritoneal dialysis patients. This $149/patient-month equals $1,788 savings per dialysis year for each patient on peritoneal dialysis for that year. Significant savings in the cost of a chronic peritoneal dialysis program may therefore occur if less expensive sources for the general medical supplies used by CAPD and, especially, CCPD patients are found.     

Infectious and catheter-related complications in pediatric patients treated with peritoneal dialysis at a single institution

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) are the predominant dialytic modalities for the majority of children while awaiting transplantation. Wide acceptability of peritoneal dialysis is hindered by infectious complications. A retrospective review of 367 pediatric patients treated with CAPD/CCPD for at least 3 months from September 1980 through December 1994 revealed that the peritonitis incidence ranged from 1.7 to 0.78 episodes per patient-year. No differences in peritonitis rates were observed between patients treated with CAPD or CCPD. Gram-positive organisms were responsible for the majority of peritonitis episodes. Age, sex, race, primary renal disease, presence of nephrotic syndrome, and serum albumin level were not associated risk factors. Longer time on treatment and diminished serum IgG level were associated with increased peritonitis incidence. Treatment was successfully completed at home in most cases. Almost half of the catheter losses were caused byStaphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and fungal peritonitis and tunnel/exit-site infections. Infectious complications are still the major causes of morbidity and treatment failure in patients treated with CAPD/CCPD. Thus, controlled studies are needed to assess methods for prevention or improvement of peritonitis rates in this patient population.     

Dialysis in diabetic patients: hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Pros and cons

Both hemodialysis (HD) as well as peritoneal dialysis (PD), are efficient renal replacement therapies in uremic patients with and without diabetes. PD is less expensive dialysis modality and may provide a survival advantage over hemodialysis in first 2 to 4 years of treatment. Chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) as well as Continuous Cycler-Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis (CCPD) have additional advantages in patients with diabetes. PD therapy will be better tolerated than HD, the blood pressure is more stable and vascular access is not necessary. Preserving residual renal function (RRF) is of paramount importance to prolong the survival outcomes in PD patients. In insulin-dependent diabetic patients intraperitoneal insulin substitution can be used. The development of new, more biocompatible PD solutions holds promise for the future. Nevertheless, in many countries HD is further more favoured in the treatment of patients with ESRD.     

Survival analysis in automated peritoneal dialysis patients

Objectives To compare the clinical characteristics, long-term survival and associated risk factors of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Methods As a retrospectively study, adult patients started peritoneal dialysis in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) from September 1st, 2002 to September 30th, 2016 were enrolled. Baseline information and dialysis associated parameters were collected. The primary outcome was death and the secondary outcome was technical failure. The risk factors of death were analyzed in APD patients by Cox's regression model. Homochromous gender and age matched CAPD patients were analyzed as control. Results The baseline condition of 69 APD patients were similar to those of 138 CAPD patients. The survival rates of APD patients at 1-year、3-year and 5-year were 95.4%, 88.0% and 73.0% respectively, which were superior to CAPD patients. No significant difference in technical survival was found between APD and CAPD patients. Single-factor Cox's regression analysis showed that all-cause mortality of CAPD patients was 2.2 times higher than that of APD patients (95% CI 1.221-3.837). In the multi-factor Cox regression analysis model, adjusted by age, complications (including cardiovascular disease and diabetes), nPCR and serum creatinine, dialysis modality was not an independent risk factor of dialysis patients. Age (HR=1.077, 95%CI 1.016-1.142, P=0.013), diabetes (HR=3.608, 95%CI 1.117-11.660, P=0.032) and serum albumin (HR=0.890, 95%CI 0.808-0.982, P=0.020) were independently associated with all-cause death of APD patients. Conclusions Dialysis modality was not an independent risk factor for the all-cause mortality of peritoneal dialysis patients. Age, diabetic nephropathy and hypoalbuminemia were independently associated with the death of APD patients.     

Peritoneal sodium mass removal in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis: influence on blood pressure control.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Sodium and water retention is common in peritoneal dialysis patients and contributes to cardiovascular disease. As peritoneal sodium removal depends partly on dwell time, and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) often uses short dwell time exchanges, the aim of this study was to compare the 24-hour peritoneal sodium removal in APD and standard continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients and to analyze its possible influence on blood pressure control. METHODS: A total of 53 sodium balance studies (30 in APD and 23 in CAPD) were performed in 36 stable peritoneal dialysis patients. The 24-hour net removal of sodium was calculated as follows: M = ViCi - VdCd, where Vd is the 24-hour drained volume, Cd is the solute sodium concentration in Vd, Vi is the amount of solution used during a 24-hour period, and Ci is the sodium concentration in Vi. Peritoneal sodium removal was compared between APD and CAPD patients. Residual renal function, serum sodium concentration, daily urinary sodium losses, weekly peritoneal Kt/V and creatinine clearance, 4-hour dialysate/plasma creatinine ratio, proportion of hypertonic solutions, net ultrafiltration, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and need for antihypertensive therapy were also compared between the groups. RESULTS: Peritoneal sodium removal was higher (p < 0.001) in CAPD than in APD patients. There were no significant differences in residual renal function, serum sodium concentration, urinary sodium losses, peritoneal urea or creatinine clearances, 4-hour dialysate/plasma creatinine ratio, or proportion of hypertonic solutions between groups. The net ultrafiltration was higher in CAPD patients and correlated strongly (r = 0.82; p < 0.001) with peritoneal sodium removal. In APD patients, peritoneal sodium removal increased significantly only in those patients with a second daytime exchange. The systolic blood pressure was higher (p < 0.05) in APD patients, and the proportion of patients with antihypertensive therapy was also higher in APD patients, although no significant relationship between blood pressure values and amount of peritoneal sodium removal was found. CONCLUSIONS: The 24-hour sodium removal is higher in CAPD than in APD patients, and there is a trend towards better hypertension control in CAPD patients. As hypertension control and volume status are important indices of peritoneal dialysis adequacy, our results have to be considered in the choice of the peritoneal dialysis modality.     

The Toronto Western Hospital catheter in a pediatric dialysis program

Following multiple technical problems with Tenckhoff catheters in children commencing prolonged dwell peritoneal dialysis, we have recently used the Toronto Western Hospital (TWH) catheter with considerable success. Six of the TWH catheters were inserted in children who had experienced either obstruction or leakage with prior use of 1-4 Tenckhoff catheters. Overall, we have used 15 TWH catheters in 12 children and have compared the results to 23 Tenckhoff catheters in 9 children. The rate of obstruction with TWH (7%) has been much less than with the Tenckhoff catheter (45%). We conclude that the TWH catheter represents a significant advance in peritoneal dialysis catheter technology for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) children starting continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD).     

Ten years' experience with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Up to January 1989, 171 patients were trained at our center on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and 17 on continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD). Over 10 years, we have gained 5,068 patient-months experience. Patient survival was 60% and 31% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In contrast, diabetics had a survival of 32% at 5 years. Major complications included 499 new episodes of peritonitis, 304 exit-site infections, 22 hernias, five bowel perforations, one hydrothorax, and three episodes of sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis. Our technique survival has been 62% and 40% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. We believe that CAPD is a viable dialysis technique for long-term treatment of chronic renal failure and it should be offered as an option to intermittent hemodialysis.