Phase II trial of carboplatin in patients with advanced germ-cell testicular tumors and transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary tract

Summary Carboplatin, an analog of cisplatin, was evaluated in a phase II study involving 25 patients with advanced testicular tumor and 45 with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary tract; 21 and 38 cases, respectively, were evaluable for response. Prior treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy had occurred in 7 of the testicular cancer patients and in 11 with TCC. The response rate (complete + partial response) in testicular tumors was 47.6%. The best response rate was observed in seminomas (70.0%), whereas the response rate in nonseminomas was 27.3%. The seminoma patients had mainly stage IIIA or less than IIA disease, with metastatic lesions restricted to the lymph nodes. Three responses were seen in patients previously treated with cisplatin. In TCC, the response rate was 18.4%. Good-risk patients were treated with a dose of 400 mg/m² every 4 weeks, whereas poor-risk patients received a lower dose of 300 mg/m². The response rates for good-risk patients were 50.0% in testicular lesions and 26.1% in TCC. For poor-risk patients, the response rates were 40.0% and 6.7%, respectively. Carboplatin was well tolerated, with no significant renal impairment or ototoxicity detected. Nausea and vomiting were experienced by 51.7% of patients, but the severity was low; half of these patients demonstrated WHO grade I toxicity. However, myelosuppression was severe. In conclusion, carboplatin demonstrated activity in both testicular tumors and TCC and is worthy of further study, especially in combination with other active drugs.     

Cisplatin and carboplatin combination as second-line chemotherapy in dacarbazine-resistant melanoma patients

High-dose cisplatin regimens have been shown to be highly active in advanced melanoma patients but are associated with unacceptable side effects. In order to increase the platinum dose but avoid severe side effects, we treated 15 dacarbazine (DTIC)-resistant metastatic melanoma patients with a combination regimen of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and carboplatin (200 mg/m2), two platinum analogues with a similar mode of action but a different toxicity pattern. After a mean follow-up period of 10.7 months (range 4-18 months), two patients (13.3%) achieved complete remission and two patients (13.3%) showed partial remission, giving an overall response rate of 26.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2-49%). Furthermore, three patients (20%; 95% CI 0-40.2%) experienced stable disease. The median duration of response was 7.1 months (95% CI 4.2-10.0 months), and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI 5.8-19.2 months), with eight patients still alive. The main side effects were haematological (leukopenia/thrombocytopenia World Health Organization [WHO] grade I-IV; anaemia WHO grade I-III), gastrointestinal (WHO grade I-III), neurological (WHO grade I-II) and renal (WHO grade I) toxicity. Nevertheless, except in one patient, side effects did not result in discontinuation of therapy. Despite the small number of patients treated in this preliminary study, we believe that combining cisplatin and carboplatin represents a novel, active and well-tolerated therapeutic option as second-line chemotherapy in DTIC-resistant advanced melanoma patients.     

Platinum analogue combination chemotherapy: cisplatin and carboplatin--a phase I trial with pharmacokinetic assessment of the effect of cisplatin administration on carboplatin excretion

Cisplatin (NSC 119875) and carboplatin (NSC 241240) are platinum (II) analogues with very different spectra of toxicity. Cisplatin dose is limited by nausea and vomiting, renal dysfunction, and dose-related peripheral neuropathy, whereas carboplatin is myelosuppressive. There are also clinical and laboratory data that suggest that these drugs may not be completely cross-resistant. Therefore, the following phase I trial of combination therapy with cisplatin and carboplatin was undertaken. Since carboplatin toxicity is enhanced in the presence of renal impairment, carboplatin excretion was also evaluated in selected patients at the maximum tolerated dose. Thirty-three patients received 50 mg/m2 cisplatin and doses of carboplatin between 160 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2. Sequential 20-minute infusions of carboplatin and then cisplatin were able to be administered at the standard doses of carboplatin (320 and 400 mg/m2) with thrombocytopenia to the degree expected if carboplatin alone had been given. However, 280 mg/m2 carboplatin followed by 25 mg/m2 cisplatin/d X 3 caused unexpectedly severe thrombocytopenia in seven of eight patients (median platelet nadir 45,000/microL; range, 12 to 321,000/microL; nadir was less than 90,000 in seven of eight patients). In three patients treated with 280 mg/m2 carboplatin plus 25 mg/m2/d X 3 cisplatin, pharmacokinetics of carboplatin were compared during consecutive monthly cycles without and with cisplatin. Modestly increased areas under the curve (AUC) for carboplatin (15% and 35%) with cisplatin were seen in the two patients who experienced more pronounced platelet suppression with combination therapy. No other limiting or unusual toxicity was seen with this combination. Responses, primarily in "platinum responsive" tumors, were seen. The combination of cisplatin plus carboplatin is feasible and merits further study.     

Phase II study of carboplatin,cisplatin, and vindesine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Cisplatin in combination with vindesine has been widely used for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), producing an overall response rate of 32%. We conducted a phase II study to examine whether the addition of carboplatin to the combination of cisplatin and vindesine would improve the antitumor activity of the two platinum agents in advanced NSCLC without increasing their toxicity. Carboplatin (240 mg/m²) and vindesine (3 mg/m²) were given intravenously on day 1 and cisplatin (60 mg/m²) and vindesine (3 mg/m²), on day 8. Of the 40 evaluable patients with advanced NSCLC, 12 showed a partial response, for an overall response rate of 30% (95% confidence interval, 17%–47%). The median duration of response was 12 weeks, and the median survival duration for all patients was 38 weeks. The major toxicity was hematologic: leukopenia (WHO grade3) was observed in 21 patients (53%) and anemia (WHO grade3), in 13 patients (33%). However, thrombocytopenia was mild and WHO grade 3 toxicity was observed in only 4 patients (10%). Nonhematologic toxicities consisted mainly of WHO grade2 nausea and vomiting in 16 patients (40%) and WHO grade2 alopecia in 11 patients (28%). No significant nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity was seen. Our findings indicate that the addition of carboplatin to the combination of cisplatin and vindesine does not improve antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Carboplatin (CBDCA, JM-8) and VP-16-213 in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer

The efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin 100 mg/m2, administered intravenously (IV) daily X 3, and VP-16-213 120 mg/m2, IV daily X 3, administered every 28 days for six courses, was assessed in 94 (36 limited stage, 58 extensive stage) previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Mediastinal irradiation using 50 Gy in 25 fractions was given to all limited-stage patients with a complete (CR) or partial response (PR) after three chemotherapy courses. Cranial irradiation was administered to all patients with CR. Objective responses were seen in 77% (CR 40%, PR 37%) of patients with limited-stage and 58% (CR, 9%; PR, 49%) with extensive-stage disease. Median relapse-free survival for objective responders with limited stage was 14.6 months and 7.9 months for extensive-stage patients. Median relapse-free survival following CR was 15.4 months and 8.5 months for PR. Median survival was 15.3 months for limited-stage and 8.1 months for extensive-stage patients. The combination was well tolerated with mild nausea or less (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 0 or 1) in 62% of patients and minimal mucositis, renal, neurotoxicity, or ototoxicity. Neutropenia less than 1.0 X 10(9)/L (WHO grade 3 or 4) was seen in 63% of patients, with two deaths from infection while neutropenic. The combination of carboplatin and VP-16-213 is a new, active program with low toxicity when applied intensively in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer.     

Phase I study of carboplatin, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide without and with lenograstim for the treatment of ovarian cancer

Cisplatin and carboplatin are both active in ovarian cancer with different toxicity profiles; thus, dose intensification may be possible by combining them. The aim of the present study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin combined with fixed doses of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide without and with support of lenograstim. Cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (starting dose 200 mg/m(2)) were given on day 1 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Escalated dose levels for carboplatin were planned by increments of 50 mg/m(2) per level. Lenograstim (L) (150 mu g/m(2)/day subcutaneously) was given in case of grade 4 leukopenia (levels without support) or from day 5 up to leukocyte >10,000/mm(3) after nadir (levels with support). Four levels were studied (200, 250, 250 + lenograstim, 300 + lenograstim) with 7, 7, 8, and 7 patients enrolled, respectively. Unacceptable toxicity was induced in 1 patient at the level I (grade 4 thrombocytopenia), in 4 patients at the level 2 (2 prolonged grade 2 leukopenia, 1 grade 4 leukopenia with concomitant grade 4 thrombocytopenia and 1 grade 4 thrombocytopenia), in 1 patient at the level 2 + L (grade 4 thrombocytopenia) and in 3 patients at the level 3 + L (3 grade 4 thrombocytopenia). Thus, 200 mg/m(2) and 250 mg/m(2) were defined as carboplatin MTDs without and with lenograstim support, respectively. Median total platinum (cisplatin + 1/4 carboplatin) delivered dose-intensities were 33, 32, 38 and 44 mg/m(2)/week at the four levels, respectively. Hematological toxicity was overall mild. In no case was febrile neutropenia recorded. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was always transient and never symptomatic. Grade 3 vomiting was the only severe non-hematological toxicity reported in 5 patients. Out of 16 patients with measurable disease, 11 objective responses were obtained (5 complete and 6 partial) for an overall response rate of 69% (95% exact CL 41-89%). Recommended dose of carboplatin is 200 mg/m(2) without and 250 mg/m(2) with support of lenograstim when combined with cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2). Dose limiting toxicity is persistent leukopenia without and grade 4 thrombocytopenia with support of lenograstim.     

Carboplatin, methotrexate, vinblastine and epirubicin (Carbo-MVE) for transitional cell bladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND:: MVAC is considered the most effective chemotherapy regimen fortransitional cell bladder carcinoma However, due to its significanttoxic effects we substituted carboplatin for cisplatin and epirubicinfor adriamycin in an attempt to produce the same response withless toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Twenty-seven patients with invasive transitional cell bladdercarcinoma received Carbo-MVE: carboplatin (300 mgr/m² d2), methotrexate(30 mgr/m² dl, 15, 22), vinblastine (3 mgr/m² d2,15, 22) andepirubicin (30 mgr/m² d2) every 4 weeks. RESULTS:: There were 2 complete clinical responses (8.4%), 5 partial clinicalresponses (20.8%), 8 stabilizations (33.3%) and 9 progressions(37.5%). The overall clinical response rate was 29.2% (ll%-47.4%,95% CI), but 2 partial clinical remissions were not pathologicallyconfirmed; were they to be considered as non-responses the responserate would fall even lower (20.8%). Toxicity was moderatelysevere, with 77.8% developing WHO grade 111-IV granulocytopenia,22.2% grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and 59.3% grade II-in vomiting.There were no toxic deaths nor any renal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS:: Our results suggest that Carbo-MVE is less active and at leastas hematotoxic as multiagent CDDP-based regimens. invasive bladder cancer, chemotherapy, carboplatin     

Dose intensification of platinum compounds with glutathione protection as induction chemotherapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Based on previous clinical experience indicating the tolerability and efficacy of high-dose cisplatin with glutathione protection in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, this study was undertaken to explore the efficacy and feasibility of an alternative high-dose, platinum-based approach including a combination of high-dose cisplatin plus carboplatin as induction chemotherapy of advanced ovarian carcinoma and intervention surgery. Fifty consecutive eligible patients with untreated stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer received 40 mg/m(2) cisplatin daily on days 1-4 and 160 mg/m(2) carboplatin on day 5. The cycle was repeated after 28 days. Patients received glutathione (2,500 mg) before each cisplatin or carboplatin administration and standard intravenous hydration. After 2 courses of induction chemotherapy, the patients underwent surgical reevaluation with debulking, when possible, followed by a further 3 cycles of 120 mg/m(2) cisplatin (i.e. 40 mg/m(2) daily for 3 consecutive days plus 600 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide on day 3) except in instances of lack of response. All eligible patients were assessed for response and toxicity. The toxicity was moderate with lack of significant nephrotoxicity. Neurotoxicity and ototoxicity were acceptable and in no patient was treatment discontinued for those toxic effects. Myelotoxicity was somewhat more severe than that observed with our previous study with high-dose cisplatin and probably related to the addition of carboplatin. Of the 40 responsive patients, 23 (46%) had a pathological complete response and 4 (8%) had a clinical complete response (without second-look laparotomy). The efficacy of the present protocol was also documented by overall survival (median survival >48 months), which appeared to be better than expected with the current therapy in this group with advanced/bulky disease. The impressive efficacy suggests a possible contribution of reduced glutathione itself in improving the outcome, as supported by preclinical studies. The results of this study should be placed in context with current platinum-based therapy including paclitaxel.     

High-dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation in refractory germ cell cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group protocol.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial was undertaken to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of high-dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with recurrent germ cell cancer received carboplatin 500 mg/m2 and etoposide 400 mg/m2 given at 7, 5, and 3 days before marrow infusion. Autologous marrow infusion (day 0) was accomplished using one half of the bone marrow harvested before chemotherapy. Patients who achieved a complete or partial response with the first cycle of treatment received a second identical cycle of chemotherapy followed by infusion of the remaining cryopreserved bone marrow. RESULTS: Objective responses were obtained in 17 of the 38 patients (45%) assessable for response, including eight partial and nine complete remissions. Five of these patients remain in continuous complete remission with minimal follow-up of 1 year. Toxicity encountered was primarily hematologic, and five patients (13%) died of treatment-related complications. Significant toxicities often seen with high-dose cisplatin (ototoxicity, neurotoxicity, and renal toxicity) were manageable in this regimen of high-dose carboplatin. CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirms the curative potential of high-dose carboplatin and etoposide in highly refractory germ cell cancer.     

Combination Cisplatin and Carboplatin in Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Twenty-three patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who had received no prior chemotherapy were treated with carboplatin 350 mg/m² followed by cisplatin 50 mg/m² every 28 days. Twenty-one of 23 patients were evaluablefor response and toxicity. Eight patients (38%) achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) with 2 CR and 6 PR. The overall median survival was 8.4 months (range 19 days-56% months). The major toxicity was hematological with grade III/IV granulocytopenia in 32% and grade III/IV thrombocytopenia in 32%. There was very little nonhematological toxicity and no nephrotoxicity. There were no therapy-related deaths. The combination carboplatin/cisplatin is tolerable in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, with objective responses in 38%; however, the response rate was not superior to single-agent carboplatin or cisplatin. Further studies with a higher dose of cisplatin should be considered.     

Phase II trial assessing the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND: There is need for more active and better tolerated combinations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) therefore conducted this phase II study to define the efficacy and toxicity profile of the combination of higher doses than usual of gemcitabine along with cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with pathologically documented advanced NSCLC were included in this trial (34 men, six women; aged 34-74 years; mean 64 years). Twenty-two patients had unresectable stage IIIB disease and 18 had stage IV disease. Karnofsky performance status was > or =70%. In five patients, surgery had previously been performed and four patients had received radiotherapy. Gemcitabine at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 was administered weekly (days 1, 8 and 15) and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 15 of each 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Responses were scored according to standard World Health Organization criteria. Of 40 assessable patients, 19 had a partial response for an overall response rate of 47.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32-64%). To date, median survival for the whole group is 10.4 months (95% CI 6.2-11.7 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 35%. Toxicity was mainly haematological. Seven patients (18%) had grade 4 neutropenia (one episode of febrile neutropenia). Thrombocytopenia (12.8% grade 3 and 2.6% grade 4) was not associated with clinical bleeding. One patient had a grade 4 transient rise in transaminase. There was no grade 3 or 4 renal toxicity. There was no grade 4 symptomatic toxicity. The most common grade 3 toxicities were nausea and vomiting (28.2%) and alopecia (10.3%) both related to cisplatin. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine can be safely administered at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 in combination with cisplatin. Thrombocytopenia seems to be less than in schedules with cisplatin given on day 1. The results of this studyshow promising activity (47.5% response rate) with modest toxicity. As this combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin deserves further evaluation in prospective randomized trials, the SLCG is comparing gemcitabine-cisplatin with etoposide-cisplatin in a phase III randomized study.     

Carboplatin and vinorelbine in untreated locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

The aim of this study was to assess the activity and toxicity of carboplatin/vinorelbine combination chemotherapy in unresectable locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Between April 1997 and June 1999 30 patients (22 M, eight F, median age 62) received treatment with carboplatin AUC 6 on day 1, and vinorelbine 25mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15. Treatment was given every 28 days for six cycles unless progressive disease occurred. Twenty-three patients (77%) had stage IV disease, and seven (23%) stage IIIB. Ninety-three percent were WHO performance status 0-1. Twenty-three patients were fully assessable. Nine patients achieved partial responses (9/23, 39%) for an overall objective response rate of 9/30 (30%; 95% CI 15-49%). The median duration of response was 2.75 months (range 1-13 months). The median progression-free survival was 2 months and the median survival 5.25 months. The actuarial 1-year survival was 20%. The median number of cycles completed was two (range 1-6). Day 15 vinorelbine was administered in only 18% of cycles. The main toxicity was myelosuppression. WHO grade III/IV neutropenia was experienced in 50% of patients, however, there were only three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Eight patients required blood transfusion and one developed grade III thrombocytopenia. Treatment was ceased in one patient because of grade IV autonomic neuropathy. No patient had significant nausea and vomiting. There were no treatment-related deaths. These results indicate that carboplatin/vinorelbine is well tolerated and has similar activity to cisplatin/vinorelbine in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer, however, the median survival was considerably shorter.     

Phase II trial of combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil (F), doxorubicin (A), and cisplatin (P) (Fap) in hormonally resistant metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma

From October 1985 to December 1986, 25 patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma were entered in a phase II trial and were administered fluorouracil (F) 600 mg/m2, on days 1 and 2, doxorubicin (A) 40 mg/m2, on day 1, and cisplatin (P) 90 mg/m2, on day 1, every month. The response was evaluated after three cycles of chemotherapy according to National Prostatic Cancer Project criteria. There were no complete remission, 1 partial remission, 13 stabilizations, 11 progressions. Toxicity was assessed using WHO criteria. Alopecia and vomiting were universal; there were 11 grade 1 anemias, 2 aplasias, and 1 grade 1 renal toxicity. A FAP regimen appears to exert a marginal effect in advanced prostatic carcinoma.     

Phase II trial of carboplatin in the management of malignant mesothelioma

Thirty-one patients with advanced malignant mesothelioma, previously untreated or having received only one prior cytotoxic regimen, were treated in a prospective, single-arm phase II trial with carboplatin (NSC 241240) at a dose of 150 mg/m2 per day intravenously (IV) for 3 days (450 mg/m2/course). One complete remission and four partial remissions were achieved, yielding an overall objective response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4% to 34%). The median duration of remission was 8 months (range, 5 to 17). Nonhematological toxicity was mild (only 12% with World Health Organization [WHO] grade 3 vomiting); 16% suffered WHO grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicity, but there were no life-threatening episodes and no treatment-related deaths. Carboplatin has modest activity against malignant mesothelioma and, because of its low toxicity, has a role in the management of this disease.     

Carboplatin (Paraplatin; JM8) and etoposide (VP-16) as first-line combination therapy for small-cell lung cancer

Fifty-two previously untreated patients with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with a combination of carboplatin 300 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 3 every 28 days for four courses. Patients with limited disease (LD) subsequently received thoracic radiotherapy; no prophylactic cranial radiotherapy was used. Forty-four patients (85%) achieved an objective response, including 82% (29% complete remissions) of LD patients and 88% (13% complete remissions) of extensive-disease (ED) patients. Median response duration for LD patients was 7 months and 5.5 months for ED patients. Median survival for both LD and ED patients was 9.5 months. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3/4 leucopenia occurring in 44% of patients. There was one (2%) treatment-related neutropenic death. Treatment was otherwise well tolerated, and in particular no renal toxicity, neurotoxicity, or ototoxicity was seen. This new combination is highly active in terms of response rate, but response duration and survival is disappointing, and might be improved by prolonged treatment or by the use of additional drugs in combination.     

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus carboplatin in stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial

PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, phase III trial was conducted to compare the tolerability of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) vs. gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) in chemonaive patients with stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Secondary objectives were to evaluate response, duration of response, time to progressive disease (TTPD), and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were required to have stage IIIb or IV NSCLC, no previous chemotherapy, Karnofsky performance status of at least 70, bidimensionally measurable disease, and age 18-75 years. Randomized patients in both arms were given gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, followed on day 1 by cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (GP) or carboplatin AUC=5 (GC). Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: Enrolled patients in both arms, 87 in GP and 89 in GC, were well balanced for demographics and disease characteristics. Dose intensity was 93.8 and 92.7% for gemcitabine in GP/GC arms, respectively; 97.7% for cisplatin and 99.9% for carboplatin. Patients with at least one grade 3/4 toxicity excluding nausea, vomiting or alopecia, were 44% in GP arm and 54% in GC arm. The only significantly different toxicities were, nausea and vomiting in GP and thrombocytopenia in GC group. The overall response rates, median TTPD, response duration and survival were, 41/29%, 5.87/4.75 months, 7.48/5.15 months, and 8.75/7.97 months for GP and GC arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: GP and GC are effective and feasible regimens for advanced NSCLC, and are comparable in efficacy and toxicity. GC may offer acceptable option to patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those who are unable to receive cisplatin.     

Phase II trial of carboplatin plus cisplatin in recurrent and advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Cisplatin is one of the most active chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of squamous carcinoma of the head and neck; however, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity are dose-limiting. The analog, carboplatin, is a promising new agent with similar activity but a different spectrum of toxicity. To evaluate if a therapeutic advantage could be achieved with acceptable toxicity, a combination of carboplatin 350 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 were administered every 28 days to patients with recurrent or metastatic disease who had received no prior chemotherapy. Of 24 patients enrolled in this study, 21 were assessable for response and toxicity. Five partial responses were observed (24%; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 4.9% to 38.6%). No complete response occurred. Two of these patients received definitive radiotherapy and achieved complete responses. The median survival of all patients was 24 weeks. Hematologic toxicity was dose-limiting necessitating a decrease in the starting dose of carboplatin to 300 mg/m2. Nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent and mild. Significant renal impairment occurred in only two patients. Although treatment with the combination of carboplatin and cisplatin is feasible, we found no therapeutic advantage in terms of an increased response or survival.     

Cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin and Carboplatin as treatment for advanced-carcinoma of the bladder - a phase-ii study

In advanced carcinoma of the bladder, the M-VAC chemotherapy schedule can yield positive results, but at the cost of very high toxicity. Recent studies have shown epidoxorubicin and to a lesser degree, carboplatin to be active against urothelial tumors, with cardiac, haematological and renal toxicity lower than that observed with CISCA or M-VAC chemotherapy regimens. In this study, we determined the toxicity and efficacy of cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m(2), epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) and carboplatin 300 mg/m(2) in a 28-day course. From February 1990 to December 1991, we enrolled 33 advanced bladder cancer patients (25 males, 8 females), mean age 63 years. 31 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The major disease localizations were: locoregional 15 (48%), lymph nodes 6 (20%), liver 5 (16%), lung 3 (10%) and bone 2 (6%). A total of 186 cycles of therapy were administered, with a mean of 5.4 per patient. Six patients (19%) had a complete response (CR): 2 locoregional, 3 lymph node and 1 lung. Eleven patients (36%) had a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 55%. The median duration of response was 53 weeks and median survival for the entire group of patients was 40 weeks. No delays or interruptions due to sepsis occurred during therapy; haematological, cardiac and renal toxicity were below WHO grade 3. The efficacy of this chemotherapy regimen proved to be comparable to that of more aggressive schedules, while its toxicity was markedly lower.     

Phase II trial of intraperitoneal carboplatin in ovarian carcinoma patients with macroscopic residual disease at second-look laparotomy: A multicentre study of the French Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer

BACKGROUND: Because of its antitumour activity and its pharmacological advantagewhen administered by the intraperitoneal route, carboplatinwas studied in a phase II multicen-tric trial. The aim of thestudy was to determine the response rate and the toxicity ofcarboplatin administered intraperito-neally and to determineif pathological complete response could be attained in womenwith macroscopic residual ovarian cancer at second-look laparotomyafter intravenous cis-platin chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with macroscopical residual disease afterintravenous cisplatin-based chemotherapy at second-look laparotomy,were treated at that time with 300 mg/m² of carboplatin administeredin the abdominal cavity every four weeks for six cycles. Ininstances of negative findings at physical and CT scan examination,laparotomy evaluation was performed and the catheter was removed.The dose of carboplatin was increased or decreased accordingto hematological toxicity. RESULTS: Efficacy is evaluable in 25 pts: 2 pts had pathological completeresponses and 1 pt had microscopic disease (12% response rateof evaluable patients). Toxicity is evaluable for 135 cyclesin 29 patients. No grade 4 hematological toxicity was observed,2 pts had grade 3 leukopenia and 3 pts had grade 3 thrombocytopenia;grade 3 vomiting was observed in 11% of cycles. No peritonealcomplication was observed; catheter dysfunction occurred afterthe first cycle in one patient who refused a surgical procedureto remove the catheter and to pursue treatment. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal carboplatin demonstrates efficacy in patientswith macroscopical residual disease at second-look laparotomyafter first-line cisplatin chemotherapy. The recommended dosefor further studies is 300 mg/m² administered every 4 weeks.A low response rate does not favour a randomised study. ovarian cancer, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, carboplatin, second look     

Treatment of extensive small cell lung cancer with carboplatin and teniposide

The combination of carboplatin and teniposide has been evaluated in a phase II trial including 47 previously untreated patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Treatment was given at monthly intervals at a dose of 200 mg/m² of carboplatin intravenously on day 1 and teniposide at a daily dose of 60 mg/m² intravenously on days 1–5. Treatment response was complete in 4 (8.9%) and partial in 19 (42.2%) of 45 evaluable patients. The overall response rate was 51.1% (95% confidence interval 36%–66%). The median duration of response was 7.1 months (range 2.1–14.8) and the median survival was 6.7 months (0.3–22.2). Myelosuppression was the most prominent side-effect. Leukopenia (WHO grade 3–4) developed in 17 (37.8%) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3–4) in 5 (11.1%) of 45 patients evaluable for toxicity. 2 treatment-related deaths were registered. The present study shows that the combination of carboplatin and teniposide produces an acceptable response rate, but response duration and survival time are short.