Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of de novo distal 5p deletion and distal 22q duplication

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of de novo distal 5p deletion and distal 22q duplication.Case reportA 34-year-old woman was underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a derivative chromosome 5 [der(5)] with an abnormal distal 5p segment of unknown origin. The parental karyotypes were normal. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis was performed on the cultured amniocytes, and the result was arr 5p15.33p13.3 (22,149–29,760,922) × 1.0, arr 22q13.2q13.33 (42, 192, 065–51,178,264) × 3.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)] with a 29.739-Mb deletion of 5p15.33-p13.3 encompassing 55 [Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)] genes including TPPP, TERT, SRD5A1, SEMA5A and CTNND2, and an 8.986-Mb duplication of 22q13.2-q13.33 encompassing 82 OMIM genes including TRMU, SCO2, TYMP, CPT1B and SHANK3. The fetal karyotype was 46,XY,der(5)t(5; 22)(p13.3; q13.2)dn. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism. Postnatal polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed a maternal origin of the aberrant chromosome 5.ConclusionaCGH and polymorphic DNA marker analyses can determine the nature and parental origin of the de novo chromosome aberration, and the information acquired is useful for genetic counseling.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a chromosome 15q24 microdeletion

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis, molecular cytogenetic characterization and genetic counseling of a chromosome 15q24 microdeletion of paternal origin.Case reportA 34-year-old primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on amniotic fluid revealed a de novo 2.571-Mb microdeletion of 15q24.1-q24.2. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable except persistent left superior vena cava and enlarged coronary sinus. The woman requested repeat amniocentesis at 22 weeks of gestation, and aCGH analysis confirmed the result of arr 15q24.1q24.2 (72,963,970–75,535,330) × 1.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)] and a 15q24 microdeletion encompassing the genes of STRA6, CYP11A1, SEMA7A, ARID3B, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CSK and CPLX3. The parents did not have such a deletion, and polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed a paternal origin of the de novo deletion. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis confirmed a 15q24 deletion. The parents elected to terminate the pregnancy, and a malformed fetus was delivered with characteristic facial dysmorphism.ConclusionSimultaneous aCGH analysis of uncultured amniocytes at amniocentesis may help to detect rare de novo microdeletion disorders.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a derivative chromosome der(18;18)(q10;q10)del(18)(q11.1q12.1)del(18)(q22.1q22.3) presenting as apparent isochromosome 18q in a fetus with holoprosencephaly

ObjectiveTo present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a derivative chromosome der(18;18)(q10;q10)del(18)(q11.1q12.1)del(18)(q22.1q22.3).Materials, Methods, and ResultsA 32-year-old woman was referred for genetic counseling of prenatally detected isochromosome 18q [i(18q)]. She had undergone amniocentesis at 19 gestational weeks because of a trisomy 18 risk of 1/39 derived from abnormally low levels of maternal serum unconjugated estriol, inhibin A, α-fetoprotein, and total β-human chorionic gonadotropin. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX,i(18)(q10). Parental karyotypes were normal. Prenatal ultrasound showed alobar holoprosencephaly. Repeated amniocentesis was requested and performed at 21 gestational weeks. Array-comparative genomic hybridization analyses revealed a 14-Mb deletion of 18p11.32-p11.21, a 37.8-Mb duplication of 18q12.1-q22.1, and a 6.9-Mb duplication of 18q22.3-q23. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization study showed the absence of an 18q12.1-specific probe signal in one arm and the absence of an 18q22.2-specific probe signal in the other arm of the derivative chromosome. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction analysis determined a paternal origin of the derivative chromosome. The cytogenetic result was 46,XX,der(18;18)(q10;q10)del(18)(q11.1q12.1)del(18)(q22.1q22.3). The fetus postnatally manifested cebocephaly.ConclusionConcomitant monosomy 18p and trisomy 18q can be associated with holoprosencephaly and abnormal maternal serum screening results. Array-comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction are useful in genetic counseling of prenatally detected isochromosomes by providing information on the origin and genetic components of the isochromosome.     

Prenatal diagnosis of del(15)(q26.1) and del(18)(q21.3) due to an unbalanced de novo translocation: ultrasound, molecular cytogenetic and autopsy findings

A case of partial deletion of the distal parts of chromosomes 15 and 18 [(15)(q26.1)(18)(q21.3)] due to a de novo translocation is reported. Cordocentesis and fetal karyotyping was done because of severe oligohydramnios and bilateral absence of kidneys. Renal defects are a frequent finding in fetuses with different chromosomal anomalies; this particular chromosomal rearrangement however has not been reported yet in a fetus with bilateral renal agenesis. FISH was performed for detailed clarification of the chromosomal anomaly. Prenatal karyotyping appears to be important in fetuses with renal agenesis.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterisation of a small de novo interstitial duplication 16q11.2-q13

We describe the first prenatally detected case of a small de novo interstitial duplication of chromosome 16q. This chromosomal aberration is extremely rare. Amniocentesis was indicated by advanced maternal age only. Ultrasound examinations of the foetus showed no abnormalities. Conventional and molecular cytogenetic analyses on cultured amniocytes by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) using partial chromosome paints and a locus-specific YAC clone revealed a de novo direct duplication of the chromosomal region 16q11.2-q13 leading to a partial trisomy 16q (46,XX,dup(16)(q11.2q13)). There are only five postnatal reports of comparable duplications involving this chromosomal region. These patients presented with little or no associated dysmorphic features but with significant neurodevelopmental delay and severe behavioural problems. After genetic counselling, the parents opted for termination of pregnancy. Post-mortem examination showed slight facial dysmorphic signs, minor dysgenesis of the ovaries and an atypical outflow of the arteria thyroidea ima.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a de novo 3.19-Mb chromosome 14q32.13-q32.2 deletion of paternal origin

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a de novo 3.19-Mb chromosome 14q32.13-q32.2 deletion of paternal origin.Case reportA 36-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation because of an advanced maternal age. Her husband was 36 years old. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,del(14)(q32.1q32.2). Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis showed the result of a 14q32.13-q32.2 deletion. Prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. The parental karyotypes were normal and did not have such a deletion. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism. aCGH was applied on the DNA extracted from cord blood. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis was applied on the DNAs extracted from placenta and parental bloods. aCGH confirmed a 3.19-Mb 14q32.13-q32.2 deletion or arr 14q32.13q32.2 (96,151,751–99,341,476) × 1.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)] encompassing 10 Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) genes of TCL1B, TCL1A, TUNAR, BDKRB2, BDKRB1, ATG2B, GSKIP, AK7, PAPOLA and VRK1. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed a paternal origin of a de novo interstitial distal 14q deletion.ConclusionDetermination of the paternal origin of a prenatally detected de novo interstitial distal 14q deletion by polymorphic DNA marker analysis in this case is significant, and the information acquired is useful for genetic counseling, especially when amniocentesis is performed because of an advanced maternal age.     

Prenatal diagnosis of de novo t(2;18;14)(q33.1;q12.2;q31.2), dup(5)(q34q34), del(7)(p21.1p21.1), and del(10)(q25.3q25.3) and a review of the prenatally ascertained de novo apparently balanced complex and multiple chromosomal rearrangements

OBJECTIVES: To present the prenatal diagnosis of a de novo complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) associated with de novo interstitial deletions and duplication and to review the literature. CASE AND METHODS: Amniocentesis was performed at 18 weeks' gestation because of an increased risk for Down syndrome based on maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotrophin screening. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,t(2;18;14)(q33.1;q12.2;q31.2),dup(5)(q34q34),del(7)(p21.1p21.1), del(10)(q25.3q25.3). The parental karyotypes were normal. The pregnancy was terminated. The fetus manifested facial dysmorphism, clinodactyly of both hands, and hypoplasia of the left great toe. Spectral karyotyping (SKY), cytogenetic polymorphism, and polymorphic DNA markers were used to investigate the imbalances and the origin of the de novo aberrant chromosomes. RESULTS: SKY showed a three-way CCR. Cytogenetic polymorphism investigation of the derivative chromosome 14 of the fetus and the parental chromosomes 14 determined the maternal origin of the translocation. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed the maternal origin of the de novo interstitial deletions and duplication. No cryptic imbalance at or near the breakpoints of the CCR was detected by the molecular analysis. CONCLUSIONS: De novo apparently balanced CCRs may be associated with imbalances in other chromosomes. We suggest further investigation and re-evaluation of cryptic or subtle imbalances in all cases classified as de novo apparently balanced CCRs.     

Prenatal cytogenetic assessment and inv(2)(p11.2q13)

OBJECTIVES: To present a series of prenatally detected cases of recurrent pericentric inversions with euchromatic breakpoints and to review the literature to determine whether parental karyotyping is required for genetic counselling. METHODS: Cases of recurrent pericentric inversions with euchromatic breakpoints were collected from Canadian Cytogenetic Laboratories. Cases included inversions for chromosome 1(p13q21), chromosome 2(p11.2q13), chromosome 5(p13q13) and chromosome 10(p11.2q21.2). RESULTS: The incidence of de novo inv(2)(p11.2q13) was low, with one case among 91 inversions. There were no cases of de novo inv(10) (p11.2q21.2) among 17 reported and one case of de novo inv(5)(p13q13) among 21 reported. CONCLUSION: Our study, and data from the literature, suggests that most cases of inv(2)(p11.2q13) have been stably inherited, that de novo cases of inv(2) are rare and that both inherited and de novo forms are without phenotypic or developmental consequences. We suggest that parental karyotyping for cases of inv(2) is not useful in counselling as it may generate unnecessary parental anxiety over a chromosomal finding that is likely innocuous.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of low-level mosaicism for tetrasomy 18p at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

Objective

We present prenatal diagnosis of low-level mosaicism for tetrasomy 18p at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.

Inv dup del(10p): Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization

ObjectiveWe present molecular cytogenetic characterization of prenatally detected inverted duplication and deletion of 10p [inv dup del(10p)].Case reportA 39-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a derivative chromosome 10 with additional material at the end of the short arm of one chromosome 10. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis revealed the result of arr 10p15.3 (136,361–451,013) × 1, 10p15.3p12.1 (536,704–25,396,900) × 3 [GRCh37 (hg19)] with a 0.31-Mb deletion of 10p15.3 encompassing ZMYND11 and DIP2C, and a 24.86-Mb duplication of 10p15.3p12.1. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a female fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism. Postnatal aCGH analysis showed that the umbilical cord had the same result as that of amniotic fluid, whereas the placenta had only the deletion of 10p15.3. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of the cord blood confirmed inverted duplication and deletion of 10p. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XX,der(10) del(10) (p15.3)dup(10) (p15.3p12.1)dn. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed a maternal origin of the chromosome 10 aberration.ConclusionPrenatal diagnosis of inv dup del(10p) with haploinsufficiency of ZMYND11 should include a genetic counseling of mental retardation and chromosome 10p15.3 microdeletion syndrome. aCGH, FISH and polymorphic DNA marker analysis are useful for perinatal investigation of inv dup del(10p).     

Prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for a del(22)(q13)

A case of prenatally detected mosaicism for a del(22)(q13) is reported. CVS was performed because of abnormal fetal ultrasound findings: cystic 'tumour' in the fetal neck and the upper thoracic aperture. Karyotypes from chorionic villi were suspicious of an aberration concerning the long arm of one chromosome 22. FISH analysis demonstrated mosaicism for a distal 22q deletion in fetal fibroblasts. The deletion was postnatally confirmed by FISH with a chromosome-specific 22q probe. The 'tumour' on autopsy turned out to be cystic thymic tissue. Apart from this, no other obvious fetal anomalies were found.     

Perinatal findings and molecular cytogenetic analysis of de novo partial trisomy 16q (16q22.1-->qter) and partial monosomy 20q (20q13.3-->qter)

OBJECTIVES: To present the perinatal findings and molecular cytogenetic analysis of de novo partial trisomy 16q and partial monosomy 20q and a review of the literature. CASE AND METHODS: Obstetric ultrasound at 33 weeks' gestation revealed intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and dolichocephaly in a 27-year-old primigravid woman. Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis was not offered because of the late stage of gestation. A 2800-g male baby was delivered at 41 weeks' gestation by cesarean section because of fetal distress. The infant postnatally presented characteristic craniofacial dysmorphism, hypotonia, cleft palate, congenital heart defects, a subependymal cyst, and hypospadia. Cytogenetic analysis revealed an additional material attached to the terminal region of chromosome 20q. The parental karyotypes were normal. Spectral karyotyping (SKY), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and polymorphic DNA markers were used to investigate the origin of the de novo aberrant chromosome. RESULTS: SKY using 24-color probes, FISH using specific 16p, 16q, 20 centromeric, and 20q telomeric probes, and polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed maternal origin of the duplication of distal 16q and the deletion of terminal 20q. Karyotype of the proband was designated as 46,XY.ish der(20)t(16;20)(q22.1;q13.3)(SKY+,16qTEL+,20qTEL-). CONCLUSIONS: Partial trisomy 16q (16q22.1-->qter) and partial monosomy 20q (20q13.3-->qter) may be associated with the perinatal findings of IUGR, dolichocephaly, hypotonia, cleft palate, congenital heart defects, a subependymal cyst, and hypospadia. SKY, FISH, and genetic marker studies help in delineating the parental origin and the regions of the deletion and duplication in the de novo unbalanced translocation.     

Prenatal findings and molecular cytogenetic analyses of a de novo interstitial deletion of 1q23.3 encompassing PBX1 gene

Objectives

To present the prenatal findings and the molecular cytogenetic analyses of a de novo interstitial deletion of 1q23.3 encompassing PBX1 gene.

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome associated with congenital heart defects

ObjectiveTo report prenatal diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in a pregnancy with congenital heart defects in the fetus.Case reportA 26-year-old, primigravid woman was referred for counseling at 24 weeks of gestation because of abnormal ultrasound findings of fetal congenital heart defects. The Level II ultrasound revealed a singleton fetus with heart defects including overriding aorta, small pulmonary artery, and ventricular septal defect. Cordocentesis was performed. The DNA extracted from the cord blood was analyzed by multiplex ligation-dependent amplification (MLPA). The MLPA showed deletion in the DiGeorge syndrome (DGS) critical region of chromosome 22 low copy number repeat (LCR) 22-A∼C. Conventional cytogenetic analysis revealed a normal male karyotype. Repeated amniocentesis and cordocentesis were performed. Whole-genome array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on cord blood was performed. aCGH detected a 3.07-Mb deletion at 22q11.21. Conventional cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype 46,XY. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on cultured amniocytes confirmed an interstitial 22q11.2 deletion.ConclusionPrenatal ultrasound findings of congenital heart defects indicate that the fetuses are at increased risk for chromosome abnormalities. Studies for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome should be considered adjunct to conventional karyotyping. Although FISH has become a standard procedure for diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, MLPA can potentially diagnose a broader spectrum of abnormalities, and aCGH analysis has the advantage of refining the 22q11.2 deletion breakpoints and detecting uncharacterized chromosome rearrangements or genomic imbalances.     

A patient with a de novo t (6;9) and an interstitial duplication of (9)(q21.2q22.1).

We report on a 4-year-old child with psychomotor retardation, general hypotonia and only mild dysmorphic features. Her chromosome constitution was 46,XX, t (6;9) (q27;q22.1), dup (9) (q21.2q22.1). This de novo interstitial duplication was confirmed using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with band-specific probes. This is the second report of a patient with an interstitial duplication of this region of the long arm of chromosome 9. It is concluded that in a child with an abnormal phenotype and a de novo (apparently) balanced translocation, the possibility of a small duplication or deletion should be considered.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for r(13), monosomy 13 and idic r(13) by amniocentesis

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for ring chromosome 13 [r(13)], monosomy 13 and isodicentric ring chromosome 13 [idic r(13)] by amniocentesis.Case reportA 24-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 23 weeks of gestation because of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in the fetus. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY,r(13)[23]/45,XY,-13[10]/46,XY,idic r(13)[2]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on cultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 13q11q31.3 (19,436,286–92,284,309) × 1.85, arr 13q31.3q34 (92,288,514–115,107,733) × 1 [GRCh37 (hg19)], indicating a 22.82-Mb 13q31.3-q34 deletion and a 15–20% mosaicism for 13q11-q31.3 deletion. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism. The placental tissues had a karyotype of 46,XY,r(13)[18]/46,XY,-13,+mar[14]/45,XY,-13[8]. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed a maternal origin of the 13q deletion.ConclusionFetus with mosaic r(13), monosomy 13 and idic r(13) may present IUGR on prenatal ultrasound, and fetoplacental cytogenetic discrepancy may exist under such a circumstance.     

Mosaic Xq duplication,or 46,X,der(X)dup(X)(q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)/ 46,XX at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

ObjectiveWe present mosaic Xq duplication, or 46,X,der(X)dup(X)(q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)/46,XX at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.Case ReportA 40-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a result of 46,X,der(X)dup(X)(q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)[7]/46,XX[20]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1–22, X) × 2. Cytogenetic analysis on maternal blood revealed a karyotype of 46,XX. At 22 weeks of gestation, she underwent repeat amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 46,XX in 22/22 colonies of cultured amniocytes and an aCGH result of (1–22, X) × 2 in the uncultured amniocytes. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. The parents decided to continue the pregnancy, and a healthy female baby was delivered at 39 weeks of gestation with a body weight of 3510 g and a body length of 49 cm. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,X,der(X)dup(X)(q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)[3]/46,XX[37]. At age two months, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on buccal mucosal cells showed Xq duplication signals in 1.25% (1/80 cells), compared with 0% (0/90 cells) in the normal control. At age nine months, the neonate had normal physical and psychomotor development. Her body weight was 9.6 Kg (85th - 97th centile), and body length was 72 cm (50th - 85th centile). Cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood revealed a karyotype of 46,X,der(X)dup(X) (q22.1q22.2)dup(X)(q25q22.3)[1]/46,XX[39]. Interphase FISH analysis on 100 buccal mucosal cells revealed no abnormal signal.ConclusionIn case of mosaicism for an Xq duplication with a normal euploid cell line at amniocentesis, the in-vitro culture process of amniocytes may cause over-estimation of the mosaic level for the aberrant chromosome because of culture artifacts, and the abnormal cell line can decline after birth.