Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 11

Objective

We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 11.

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 3

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 3.Case reportA 36-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+mar[6]/46,XX[18]. The mother's karyotype was 47,XX,+mar[4]/46,XX[46]. The father's karyotype was 46.XY. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis of uncultured amniocytes revealed a result of arr 3q11.1q12.1 (93,575,285–98,956,687) × 2–3 [GRCh37 (hg19)]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. The parents elected to continue the pregnancy, and a 2470-g female baby was delivered at 37 weeks of gestation without phenotypic abnormalities. The cord blood had a karyotype of 47,XX,+mar[8]/46,XX[32]. aCGH analysis of cord blood revealed a result of arr 3q11.1q11.2 (93,649,973–97,137,764) × 2.4 [GRCh37 (hg19)] with a log2 ratio of 0.25 and a 30–40% mosaicism for 3.488-Mb dosage increase in 3q11.1-q11.2 encompassing four [Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)] genes of PROS1, ARL13B, NSUN3 and EPHA6. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis confirmed 30% (6/20 cells) mosaicism for the sSMC(3) in the blood lymphocytes.ConclusionaCGH and FISH analyses are useful for perinatal investigation of a prenatally detected sSMC.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 15 in a pregnancy associated with recurrent Down syndrome

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 15 in a pregnancy associated with recurrent Down syndrome.Case reportA 33-year-old, gravida 4, para 2, woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of a previous child with Down syndrome and a karyotype of 46,XY,der(14;21)(q10; q10),+21. In this pregnancy, amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[12]/48,XX,+21,+mar[3]. The parental karyotypes were normal. The pregnancy was terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with characteristic craniofacial appearance of Down syndrome and hypoplastic middle phalanx of the fifth fingers. The placenta had a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[37]/48,XX,+21,+mar[3]. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[38]/48,XX,+21,+mar[2]. In addition to trisomy 21, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on the DNA extracted from umbilical cord revealed 40～50% mosaicism for a 2.604-Mb duplication of 15q25.2–q25.3, or arr 15q25.2q25.3 (83,229,665–85,834,131) × 2.4 [GRCh37 (hg19)] encompassing 19 Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) genes. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) using the DNAs extracted from cultured amniocytes and parental bloods revealed maternal origin of the sSMC(15) and the extra chromosome 21.Conclusion: aCGH is useful for identification of the nature of sSMC, and QF-PCR is useful for determination of the parental origin of the aberrant chromosomes.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a familial small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from the acrocentric chromosome 14/22

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a familial small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from the acrocentric chromosome 14/22.Case reportA 40-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar. Prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance. Cytogenetic analysis of the parental bloods revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,inv (9) (p12q13),+mar in the father and a karyotype of 46, XX in the mother. The sSMC was investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on cultured amniocytes using the CEP 13/21 α-satellite specific gene probe labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) fluorophore and the CEP 14/21 α-satellite specific gene probe labeled with Texas Red fluorophore (Cytocell Inc.). The result showed that the sSMC was derived from the chromosome 14/22, or+mar.ish dic (14/22) (D13Z1/D21Z1-, D14Z1/D22Z1+)[20]. A healthy male baby was delivered at term with no phenotypic abnormality. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on parental bloods and the child's peripheral blood was used to exclude uniparental disomy (UPD) (14) and UPD(22).ConclusionFISH analysis is useful for the determination of an sSMC derived from an acrocentric chromosome under the circumstance of no genomic imbalance at amniocentesis. QF-PCR analysis is useful for excluding the possible associated UPD.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 16

Objective

We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 16.

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 2

Objective

We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 2.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a de novo small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 15 in a pregnancy with incidental detection of a maternal Robertsonian translocation of 45,XX,der(13;14) (q10;q10)

ObjectiveWe present molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 15 in a pregnancy with incidental detection of a maternal Robertsonian translocation of 45,XX,der(13; 14) (q10; q10).Case reportA 37-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes showed the result of no genomic imbalance or arr (1–22) × 2, (X,Y) × 1. Cytogenetic analysis of the parents showed a karyotype of 45,XX,der(13; 14) (q10; q10) in the mother and a karyotype of 46,XY in the father. Prenatal ultrasound was unremarkable. At 38 weeks of gestation, a 2790-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered. The cord blood had a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis showed the result of +mar.ish dic(15) (D15Z1++, SNRPN-, PML-) (18/20). The extra chromosome was derived from chromosome 15.ConclusionMetaphase FISH analysis is useful for the identification of the origin of an sSMC in the presence of no genomic imbalance at aCGH analysis. Prenatal diagnosis of a de novo sSMC may be associated with a Robertsonian translocation in the parents, and parental cytogenetic analysis is necessary under such a circumstance.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from 2q11.1-q12.1 associated with fetal bilateral radial dysplasia

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from 2q11.1-q12.1 associated with fetal bilateral radial dysplasia.Case reportA 27-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of club hands on fetal ultrasound. The internal organs of the fetus were normal. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar [13]/46,XY [11]. The parental karyotypes were normal. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis of the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr 2q11.1q12.1 (95,529,039–102,825,556) × 3.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)]. The pregnancy was terminated at 20 weeks of gestation, and a malformed fetus was delivered with isolated bilateral radial dysplasia. The cord blood had a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar[24]/46,XY[16]. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis of the DNAs extracted from umbilical cord and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy for chromosome 2. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis confirmed an sSMC derived from chromosome 2q11.1-q12.1 in cultured amniocytes.ConclusionHigh-level mosaicism for an sSMC derived from chromosome 2q11.1-q12.1 can be associated with fetal abnormalities.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 21q11.2-q21.1 and a literature review

Objective

We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 21q11.2-q21.1, and we review the literature of an sSMC(21) with a duplication of 21q11.2-q21.1.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 8 associated with congenital hypoplasia of the tongue and review of the literature

ObjectiveTo present molecular cytogenetic characterization of mosaic supernumerary ring chromosome 8 which has trisomy of a region of chromosome 8p12-q21.13 associated with congenital hypoplasia of the tongue and review of the literature.Case reportA 27 year-old woman presented with congenital hypoplasia of the tongue. The chromosome karyotype of peripheral blood lymphocytes was detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis. The genome copy number variations were detected by SNP array. Conventional cytogenetic analysis of the peripheral blood revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+mar[60]/46,XX[40]. SNP array revealed that there was a duplication of 45.2 Mb at arr[hg19] 8p12q21.13(36,013,636–81,263,140) × 2–3.ConclusionWith this study a patient involving mosaic trisomy 8p12-q21.13 along with clinical properties, is described and compared to previously reported cases involving a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 8.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) inherited from her mosaic sSMC(15) mother and a literature review

ObjectiveWe characterized a maternally inherited small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 15 according to prenatal detection and made a review on the prenatal sSMC(15) cases with mosaic maternal inheritance.Case reportA 29-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation due to the high risk of Down syndrome in maternal serum screening. No abnormalities were observed in prenatal ultrasound findings. G-banding analysis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+mar. Subsequently, we recalled the couple back for chromosomal analysis. The father's karyotype was normal while the mother's karyotype was 47,XX,+mar[15]/46,XX[35]. Molecular genetic analysis was utilized to identify the marker chromosome. The chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results of the mother showed there existed microduplications in the locus of 14q32.33, 15q21.1, 19p12 and Xq26.2, respectively. Then Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using specific probes for chromosomes 13/21, 14/22, and 15 was applied on the mother and the fetus. And the marker chromosomes for the mother and the fetus were all finally identified as inv dup(15) (D15Z1++, SNRPN-, PML-), which illustrated that the fetus inherited the sSMC(15) from her mother. Finally, a healthy female infant was delivered with no phenotypic abnormalities at 39 weeks.ConclusionThe combined utilization of the molecular genetic technologies, such as FISH and CMA, plays a critical role in the identification of the origins and genetic constitutions of sSMC, which would make a significant contribution to genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis.     

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a chromosome 15q24 microdeletion

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis, molecular cytogenetic characterization and genetic counseling of a chromosome 15q24 microdeletion of paternal origin.Case reportA 34-year-old primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XY. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on amniotic fluid revealed a de novo 2.571-Mb microdeletion of 15q24.1-q24.2. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable except persistent left superior vena cava and enlarged coronary sinus. The woman requested repeat amniocentesis at 22 weeks of gestation, and aCGH analysis confirmed the result of arr 15q24.1q24.2 (72,963,970–75,535,330) × 1.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)] and a 15q24 microdeletion encompassing the genes of STRA6, CYP11A1, SEMA7A, ARID3B, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CSK and CPLX3. The parents did not have such a deletion, and polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed a paternal origin of the de novo deletion. Metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis confirmed a 15q24 deletion. The parents elected to terminate the pregnancy, and a malformed fetus was delivered with characteristic facial dysmorphism.ConclusionSimultaneous aCGH analysis of uncultured amniocytes at amniocentesis may help to detect rare de novo microdeletion disorders.     

Prenatal diagnosis of low-level mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 9q (9q13-q21.33) in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome,and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes

ObjectiveWe present prenatal diagnosis of low-level mosaicism for a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 9q (9q13-q21.33) in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome, and cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes.Case reportA 36-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Cytogenetic analysis on cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 46,XY in 20/20 colonies. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed 30% mosaicism for a de novo 20.3-Mb gene dosage increase at 9q13-q21.33. Repeat amniocentesis and cordocentesis were performed at 21 weeks of gestation. Cytogenetic analysis on cord blood revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar [3]/46,XY [37]. aCGH analysis of cord blood revealed 7.5% mosaicism for a 17.15-Mb gene dosage increase at 9q21.11-q21.33. aCGH analysis of uncultured amniocytes revealed 11.7% mosaicism for a 17.15-Mb gene dosage increase at 9q21.11-q21.33. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis excluded uniparental disomy 9. The parental karyotypes were normal. The pregnancy was carried to 37 weeks of gestation, and a 2955-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered. At birth, the cord blood had a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar [3]/46,XY [37], the placenta had a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar [10]/46,XY [30], and the umbilical cord had a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar [14]/46,XY [36]. aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from cord blood at birth revealed no genomic imbalance. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on buccal mucosal cells at age two months detected 3.8% (4/106 cells) mosaicism for the sSMC, compared with 2% (2/100 cells) in the normal control. The neonate had normal physical development at age two months.ConclusionCytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes may exist in the pregnancy with fetal mosaic sSMC. Low-level mosaicism for an sSMC derived from chromosome 9q13-q21.33 at prenatal diagnosis can be associated with a favorable outcome in the fetus.     

Molecular delineation of de novo small supernumerary marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis,a retrospective study

ObjectivesTo define the genotype-phenotype correlation of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) and conduct precise genetic counseling, we retrospectively searched and reviewed de novo sSMCs cases detected during prenatal diagnosis at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.Materials and methodsChromosome karyotypes of 20,314 cases of amniotic fluid from pregnant women were performed. For 16 samples with de novo sSMCs, 10 were subjected to single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array or low-coverage massively parallel copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) analysis.ResultsAmong the 10 sSMCs cases, two sSMCs derived from chromosome 9, and three sSMCs derived from chromosomes 12, 18 and 22. The remaining 5 cases were not identified by SNP array or CNV-seq because they lacked euchromatin or had a low proportion of mosaicism. Four of them with a karyotype of 47,XN,+mar presented normal molecular cytogenetic results (seq[hg19] 46,XN), and the remaining patient with a karyotype of 46,XN,+mar presented with Turner syndrome (seq[hg19] 45,X). Five sSMCs samples were mosaics of all 16 cases.ConclusionConsidering the variable origins of sSMCs, further genetic testing of sSMCs should be performed by SNP array or CNV-seq. Detailed molecular characterization would allow precise genetic counseling for prenatal diagnosis.     

Inv dup del(10p): Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization

ObjectiveWe present molecular cytogenetic characterization of prenatally detected inverted duplication and deletion of 10p [inv dup del(10p)].Case reportA 39-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a derivative chromosome 10 with additional material at the end of the short arm of one chromosome 10. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis revealed the result of arr 10p15.3 (136,361–451,013) × 1, 10p15.3p12.1 (536,704–25,396,900) × 3 [GRCh37 (hg19)] with a 0.31-Mb deletion of 10p15.3 encompassing ZMYND11 and DIP2C, and a 24.86-Mb duplication of 10p15.3p12.1. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a female fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism. Postnatal aCGH analysis showed that the umbilical cord had the same result as that of amniotic fluid, whereas the placenta had only the deletion of 10p15.3. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of the cord blood confirmed inverted duplication and deletion of 10p. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XX,der(10) del(10) (p15.3)dup(10) (p15.3p12.1)dn. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis confirmed a maternal origin of the chromosome 10 aberration.ConclusionPrenatal diagnosis of inv dup del(10p) with haploinsufficiency of ZMYND11 should include a genetic counseling of mental retardation and chromosome 10p15.3 microdeletion syndrome. aCGH, FISH and polymorphic DNA marker analysis are useful for perinatal investigation of inv dup del(10p).