Knowledge of,and participation in,advance care planning: A cross-sectional study of acute and critical care nurses’ perceptions

BackgroundNurses have a core role in facilitating discussions and enacting decisions about end-of-life issues for patients in hospitals. Nurses’ own knowledge and attitudes may influence whether they engage in meaningful end-of-life conversations with patients.AimsTo determine in a sample of nurses working in acute and critical care hospital wards:1) their knowledge of advance care planning, including the authority of substitute decision-makers and legal validity of advance directives;2) their own participation in advance care planning decision-making practices; and3) associations between nurses’ socio-demographic characteristics; clinical expertise; and knowledge and behaviour in relation to advance care planning practices.DesignQuestionnaire-based, cross-sectional study.Setting and participantsThe study was conducted with 181 registered and enrolled nurses employed in acute and critical care wards of three metropolitan hospitals in Australia.ResultsNurses were least knowledgeable about items relating to the authority of medical (56%) and financial (42%) substitute decision-makers. Few nurses had prepared advance directives (10%) or appointed medical (23%) or financial (27%) decision-makers, when compared to discussing end-of-life wishes (53%) or organ donation (75%). Overall, 15% of nurses had not engaged in any advance care planning practices. Nurses who had cared for 11–30 dying patients in the last six months were more likely to have an increased knowledge score. Older nurses were more likely to participate in a greater number of advance care planning practices and an increase in shifts worked per week led to a significant decrease in nurses’ participation.ConclusionNurses have a key role in providing advice and engaging dying patients and their families in advance care planning practices. Nurses’ own knowledge and rates of participation are low. Further education and support is needed to ensure that nurses have an accurate knowledge of advance care planning practices, including how, when and with whom wishes should be discussed and can be enacted.     

Barriers to the provision of optimal care to dying patients in hospital: An international cross-sectional comparison study of nurses’ perceptions

BackgroundNurses play an important role in caring for patients who are dying in hospital, so it is important to understand their perceptions of the factors that may influence the quality of that care. Much of the existing literature is focused on end-of-life care provision in western settings. Little is known about how nurses’ perceptions of end-of-life care provision may differ across Asian and Western locations. Understanding the similarities and differences between the perceptions of nurses in Asian and Western locations about the barriers to the provision of high-quality end-of-life care may help guide education and policy initiatives to improve end-of-life care in each location.AimTo compare the perceptions of nurses from Australia, South Korea, and Hong Kong regarding barriers to high-quality end-of-life care provision for people dying in hospitals.MethodsA cross-sectional study of hospital-based nurses from Australia (n = 153), South Korea (n = 241), and Hong Kong (n = 188) completed a survey between December 2016 and June 2018. Nurses indicated the extent to which they perceived 40 items across five domains to be a barrier to high-quality end-of-life care provision.FindingsSignificant variation between the perceptions of nurses in each location was found in two-thirds of the survey items. The greatest difference was seen in the item doctors continue life-sustaining medical interventions for too long, which was considered a significant barrier by 60.1% of Australian nurses, 32.9% of South Korean nurses and 13.8% of Hong Kong nurses. The greatest cross-location agreement related to differences in religious beliefs and languages. These items were considered a significant barrier by fewer than one-quarter of nurses.ConclusionNurses in Hong Kong, South Korea and Australia perceived a range of challenges to the provision of optimal end-of-life care. The significant differences observed in two-thirds of response items support the hypothesis that strategies to improve the quality of end-of-life care in one location may not be effective in another. For interventions to be effective they must be tailored to the unique nature of care-provision in each location. Gaining an understanding of the potential reasons for these differences may highlight potential targets for interventions that address the unique factors associated with care provision in each location.     

Family medicine residents’ practice intentions: Theory of planned behaviour evaluation

ObjectiveTo assess residents’ practice intentions since the introduction of the College of Family Physicians of Canada’s Triple C curriculum, which focuses on graduating family physicians who will provide comprehensive care within traditional and newer models of family practice.DesignA survey based on Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour was administered on 2 occasions.SettingMcMaster University in Hamilton, Ont.ParticipantsResidents (n = 135) who were enrolled in the Department of Family Medicine Postgraduate Residency Program at McMaster University in July 2012 and July 2013; 54 of the 60 first-year residents who completed the survey in 2012 completed it again in 2013.ResultsThe responses indicate that the factors modeled by the theory of planned behaviour survey account for 60% of the variance in the residents’ intentions to adopt a comprehensive scope of practice upon graduation, that there is room for curricular improvement with respect to encouraging residents to practise comprehensive care, and that targeting subjective norms about comprehensive practice might have the greatest influence on improving resident intentions.ConclusionThe theory of planned behaviour presents an effective approach to assessing curricular effects on resident practice intentions while also providing meaningful information for guiding further program evaluation efforts in the Department of Family Medicine at McMaster University.     

Simulated electronic health documentation: A cross-sectional exploration of factors influencing nursing students’ intention to use

The aim of this study was to investigate factors influencing nursing students' intention to use a simulated web-application ‘Integrated Nursing Education System’ for practicing electronic health documentation. The cross-sectional study was conducted at a Malaysian University that provides undergraduate nursing degree program. A total of 133 undergraduate nursing students in their year 2 to year 4 of the program were recruited. They had accessed the simulated web-application as part of the teaching-learning activities during the academic year 2016/2017. Technology Acceptance Model was used to guide the study. Validated questionnaires were used to measure the students' perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitudes and intention to use the application. Data collection was done at the end of the semester. Data analysis was done using SPSS (19.0) and AMOS (23.0). Perceived usefulness was the most influential factor of the students' intention to use the simulated web-application. Perceived ease of use influenced their perceived usefulness significantly. Nurse educators should explain the usefulness of the simulated web-application before assigning students to access it to practice electronic health documentation. The availability of a stable internet access and IT support is important to influence students' perceived ease of use and intention to use the application.     

Factors influencing the optimal selection of central venous access devices: A qualitative study of health care team members’ perspectives

ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore health care team members’ understanding of the factors influencing the optimal selection of central venous access devices (CVADs).MethodsThe data of the study was collected using semi-structured interviews. Twenty-six hospital medical staff (four hospital manager, 15 head nurses, 7 nurse) with experience in peripheral or central catheterization from four regions (Northern China, Southern China, Northwest China, and Qinghai-Tibet China) in China were interviewed between June and October 2021. Content analysis was used to analyze the data.ResultsThe results revealed five themes and 14 sub-themes. Patients: concerns, resources, requirements, and evaluation (security concerns, support resources, life requirements, evaluation among patients); nurses: awareness, knowledge, and popularizing methods (awareness of intravenous therapy, understanding of professional knowledge, forms of popularizing methods); doctors: support and involvement (support for decision-making, involvement in intravenous work); hospital managers: authority, quality control and continuing education (management of catheterization authority, quality control of intravenous infusion, investment in continuing education) and environment: differences and commonalities (differences in social support, and current commonalities).ConclusionNurses and other healthcare team members’ understanding, selection, use, and recommendation of CVADs have an indirect effect on patients’ decision-making. Therefore, hospital managers and government departments can indirectly strengthen medical team cooperation and improve learning education in order to improve the safety of patients receiving intravenous infusions.     

Using affective events theory to conceptualise nurses’ emotional behaviour: A scoping review

BackgroundAffective Events Theory is a framework increasingly used in the organisational sciences to predict employee emotional reactions to workplace events and environments. However, this theory has been underutilised in the context of examining the behaviour of nurses.AimsThis review aimed to identify and describe how to apply Affective Events Theory to conceptualise nursing professionals’ emotional reactions and behaviours within patient care settings.Review methodsThe scoping review procedures were based on published recommendations, including searches in seven databases for sources meeting eligibility criteria and a protocol-driven approach for data screening, abstraction, and synthesis.FindingsThirteen sources met inclusion criteria by using Affective Events Theory to conceptualise emotional responses and behaviours among nurses within patient care settings. Review sources discussed affective events in nursing settings, including work-related tasks and workplace violence/bullying. Nurses’ affective reactions to these events prompted worker attitudes and outcomes, including their intention to stay/leave, avoidance behaviours, accident-prone behaviours, and unethical actions.DiscussionAffective Events Theory was reported as a sound approach for theorising in nursing settings. However, the low number of records identified may suggest that this theory has been scarcely applied in this context.ConclusionAffective Events Theory has likely not been utilised in health sciences literature to the extent possible, representing a substantial opportunity for theorising regarding nursing professionals’ emotional reactions and behaviours. From a practical perspective, this review also potentially serves to support nurses as they seek to improve patient care and caregiver outcomes.     

The effects of the reorganisation of an intensive care unit due to COVID-19 on nurses’ wellbeing: An observational cross-sectional study

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effects of the reorganisation of an intensive care unit for COVID-19 patients in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on wellbeing perceived by nurses.MethodsAn observational cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate wellbeing perceived by nurses who during the study were on duty in the COVID-19 intensive care unit. The “Covid-19-Nurse Well-being at Work (NWB) scale” questionnaire consisting of 72 items divided into 13 sections, was validated and used to collect data.ResultsThe level of wellbeing perceived by the nurses was very good (4.77; SD 0.83). Differences in the of level of perceived wellbeing were found for “years of experience” and the various levels of competence. We found a positive correlation between “female gender” and “nurses’ togetherness and collaboration”, a negative correlation between “male gender” and “satisfactory practical organisation of work, and a negative correlation between “work experience” and the overall “level of wellbeing at work.ConclusionsThe reorganisation had positive effects in terms of wellbeing perceived by the nurses. The factors that contributed mostly to the perception of wellbeing were in the area of “support”, “communication, and “socializing with colleagues”. It is appropriate to consider “gender differences”, “work experience” and “levels of competence” when implementing this type of reorganisation to respond to a pandemic or a health emergency.     

Where are the critical care nurses? A statewide analysis of actively practicing nurses’ transitions out of the clinical area

BackgroundCritical care nurse shortages and burnout have spurred interest in the adequacy of nursing supply in the United States. Nurses can move between clinical areas without  additional education or licensure.PurposeTo identify transitions that critical care nurses make into non-critical care areas, and examine the prevalence and characteristics associated with those transitions.MethodsSecondary analysis of state licensure data from 2001-2013.DiscussionMore than 75% of nurses (n = 8,408) left critical care in the state, with 44% making clinical area transitions within 5 years. Critical care nurses transitioned into emergency, peri-operative, and cardiology areas. Those observed in recession years were less likely to make transitions; female and nurses with masters/doctorate degrees were more likely.ConclusionThis study used state workforce data to examine transitions out of critical care nursing. Findings can inform policies to retain and recruit nurses back into critical care, especially during public health crises.     

Cancer patients’ use of primary care out-of-hours services: a cross-sectional study in Norway

Objective: To investigate how cancer patients in Norway use primary care out-of-hours (OOH) services and describe different contact types and procedures.

Design: A retrospective cross-sectional registry study using a billing registry data source.

Setting: Norwegian primary care OOH services in 2014.

Subjects: All patients’ contacts in OOH services in 2014. Cancer patients were identified by ICPC-2 diagnosis.

Main outcome measures: Frequency of cancer patients’ contacts with OOH services, contact types, diagnoses, procedures, and socio-demographic characteristics.

Results: In total, 5752 cancer patients had 20,220 contacts (1% of all) in OOH services. Half of the contacts were cancer related. Cancer in the digestive (22.9%) and respiratory (18.0%) systems were most frequent; and infection/fever (21.8%) and pain (13.6%) most frequent additional diagnoses. A total of 4170 patients had at least one cancer-related direct contact; of these, 64.5% had only one contact during the year. Cancer patients had more home visits and more physicians’ contact with municipal nursing services than other patients, but fewer consultations (p?p?Conclusion: There was no indication of overuse of OOH services by cancer patients in Norway, which could indicate good quality of cancer care in general.

• KEY POINTS

• Many are concerned about unnecessary use of emergency medical services for non-urgent conditions.

• ??There was no indication of overuse of out-of-hours services by cancer patients in Norway.

• ??Cancer patients had relatively more home visits, physician’s contact with the municipal nursing service, and weekend contacts than other patients.

• ??Cancer patients in the least central municipalities had relatively more contacts with out-of-hours services than those in more central municipalities.