Lymph node mapping and axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in 243 invasive breast cancers with no palpable nodes. The south Lyon hospital center experience

STUDY AIM: To evaluate the effect of intraoperative lymph node mapping and sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) on the axillary staging of patients with N0 breast carcinoma. Two techniques were used: blue dye alone (Evans Blue and Patent Blue) and combined technique (blue dye and isotope). METHODS: The incidence of axillary node metastasis in axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and SLND was compared prospectively. Multiple sections of each SLN were examined by HPS staining and immunohistochemical techniques. Two sections of each non sentinel node in ALND specimens were examined by routine HPS staining. RESULTS: 243 patients underwent ALND after SLN biopsy. The SLN detection rate was 225/243 cases (92.59%): 89.94% with blue dye alone and 100% with the combined technique. The false-negative rate was less than 2%. CONCLUSION: SN biopsy is an accurate staging technique for N0 breast cancer. SLN biopsy with multiple sections and immunohistochemical staining of the SLN can identify significantly more patients with lymph node metastases than ALND with routine HPS staining.     

Adverse Reactions to Isosulfan Blue During Selective Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Melanoma

Background: Selective sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection can spare about 80% of patients with primary melanoma from radical lymph node dissection. This procedure identifies the SLN either visually by injecting isosulfan blue dye around the primary melanoma site or by handheld gamma probe after radiocolloid injection.Methods: During selective SLN mapping, 1 to 5 ml of isosulfan blue was injected intradermally around the primary melanoma. From November 1993, to August 1998, 406 patients underwent intraoperative lymphatic mapping with the use of both isosulfan blue and radiocolloid injection. Three cases of selective SLN dissection, in which adverse reactions to isosulfan blue occurred, were reviewed.Results: We report three cases of anaphylaxis after intradermal injection with isosulfan blue of 406 patients who underwent intraoperative lymphatic mapping by using the procedure as described above. The three cases we report vary in severity from treatable hypotension with urticaria and erythema to severe cardiovascular collapse with or without bronchospasm or urticaria.Conclusions: In our series, the incidence of anaphylaxis to isosulfan blue was approximately 1%. Anaphylaxis can be fatal if not recognized and treated rapidly. Operating room personnel who participate in intraoperative lymphatic mapping where isosulfan blue is used must be aware of the potential consequences and be prepared to treat anaphylaxis.     

Sentinel lymph node for breast cancer: remove less to know more

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to study the value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with breast cancer seen at a community hospital. METHODS: Consecutive cases receiving primary treatment for unicentric breast cancer less than 3 cm in diameter were prospectively studied from January 1999 to July 2000. All patients signed a detailed informed consent. The majority of patients (89%) underwent a combined technique of intradermal injection of 0.3-1.2 mCi of (99)Tc and 1-3 cc of Patent Blue at the biopsy site. Intraoperative localization was performed with a hand-held gamma probe. The first 15 patients underwent routine back-up lymphadenectomy. Thereafter, only patients with positive SLN, suspicious findings, or personal preference underwent formal axillary dissection. RESULTS: One hundred eight cases were included in the study with a median age of 61 years and a median diameter of the breast tumor of 1.5 cm. Success rate for identification of SLN was 94% (101/108 cases). A total of 917 additional lymph nodes were removed after SLN biopsy (median 6.5 lymph nodes/patient). Correlation between SLN and the final axillary status was 98%. In 20/36 patients (61%) with positive axillary status the sentinel lymph node was the only positive one. Ten patients had only microscopic foci of cancer found in the SLN. Sixty-seven patients (62%) could have avoided axillary dissection becouse the SLN was found, it was negative, and there were no other intraoperative suspicious findings. CONCLUSIONS: SLN biopsy is accurate and easily reproduced. Our data confirms that the majority of breast cancer patients may no longer need routine axillary lymphadenectomy.     

乳腺癌哨兵淋巴结检出相关临床和组织学因素

目的　探讨乳腺癌术中哨兵淋巴结 (sentinellymphnode ,SLN)检出成功率的预测因素。方法　应用原发肿瘤周围注射 1%亚甲蓝示踪方法对 10 8例Ⅰ、Ⅱ期原发乳腺癌患者进行哨兵淋巴结活检 (sentinellymphnodebiopsy ,SLNB) ,随后行包括腋窝淋巴结清扫 (ALND)在内的乳腺癌手术。通过分析评估临床和组织学因素 ,确定术中SLN成功检出的相关因素。　结果　 10 8例患者术中行SLNB ,84例成功证实SLN(77 78% )。在被评估的临床因素中 ,年龄 <5 0岁 (χ2 =7 4 4 7,P <0 0 1)、原发肿瘤位于上、外象限 (χ2 =6 330 ,P <0 0 5 )、术前穿刺活检确诊 (χ2 =5 5 0 9,P <0 0 5 )、淋巴管示踪成功 (χ2=13 12 5 ,P <0 0 1)明显地与术中SLN的成功证实有关。组织学因素与SLN的检出无关。　结论SLNB过程中SLN检出可能失败。术中SLN证实最好的预测因子是淋巴管示踪成功 ,另外的因素如年龄 ,肿瘤位置和确诊方法对SLN的成功检出同样重要。     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检对腋窝淋巴结转移的预警价值研究

目的探讨乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(sentinel lymph node,SLN)预警腋窝淋巴结转移的价值. 方法对56例乳腺癌行亚甲蓝前哨淋巴结定位、活检和腋窝淋巴结清扫术,标本常规行HE染色、免疫组化病理检查. 结果 SLN成功检出52例(52/56,92.8%),常规病理检查证实SLN转移22例;SLN无转移,但非SLN发现转移者1例,假阴性率为4.3%(1/23).常规病理检查无转移的29例患者,免疫组化检测发现1例CK-19( )、EMA( ),另1例CK-19( ),CEA( ),而所属非前哨淋巴结无肿瘤转移. 结论乳腺癌亚甲蓝前哨淋巴结定位、活检可以预示腋窝淋巴结转移.     

Predicting residual lymph node basin disease in melanoma patients with sentinel lymph node metastases

BACKGROUND: The incidence of residual occult disease in nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLN) after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with melanoma is relatively low. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that may be predictive of occult NSLN metastases after positive SLN biopsy. METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes who subsequently underwent complete lymph node dissection (CLND) were evaluated. RESULTS: Only the number of positive SLN predicted the status on NSLN by univariate (P = 0.008) and multivariate (P = 0.028) analyses. None of the other variables (characteristics of SLN metastases, number of draining nodal basins, age, sex, thickness, Clark level, ulceration, number of mitoses/mm(2), histological subtype, and location of the primary) significantly predicted CLND results. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying patients with residual lymph node basin disease remains difficult. Thus, lymph node dissection should be performed in all patients after positive sentinel node biopsy.     

Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy for malignant melanoma

To date, selective sentinel lymphadenectomy (SSL) should be considered a standard approach for staging patients with primary invasive melanoma greater than or equal to 1 mm. It is imperative that the multidisciplinary team master the techniques of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and postoperative pathologic evaluation of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). A SLN is defined as a blue, "hot", or any subsequent lymph node greater than 10% of the in vivo count of the hottest lymph node and as an enlarged or indurated lymph node. Frozen sections are not recommended. For extremity melanoma, delayed SSL may be performed. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for extremity melanoma may be done the night before so that surgery can be scheduled as the first case of the following day. Every surgeon who uses blue dye should be cognizant of the potential adverse reaction to isosulfan blue and treatment for such a potential fatal reaction. A complete lymph node dissection is done if the SLN is found to be positive. Elective lymph node dissection should not be done if SSL can be done as a staging procedure. It is important for investigators involved with SSL to follow the clinical outcome of their patients so that the role of SSL can be further defined.     

Detection of lymphatic metastasis from malignant melanoma after identification of the sentinel node by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative radioisotopic detection

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection of the first lymph node draining the primary tumour site, using a radioisotopic mapping alone and to determine whether a preoperative lymphoscintigraphy using technetium sulfur colloid and a hand-held gamma detecting probe could improve the detection of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From January to December 1998, 36 patients with a cutaneous melanoma larger than 0.75 mm, stage I TNM were included in this prospective study. Mean Breslow was 1.85 mm. The distribution of melanoma was head and neck (n = 9), trunk (n = 7), upper extremities (n = 4), lower extremities (n = 16). Preoperative lymphoscintigram and intraoperative detection were used. The first hot lymph node was supposed to be the SLN. RESULTS: In all cases, a lymph node was found and nine patients had more than one SLN (average number of SLN per patient: 1.25). Aberrant drainages were found in seven patients (19.4%): 1 in-transit lymph node, three paradoxical bassins, three bypasses). Four out of 36 patients had lymph node metastases and underwent elective lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: The radio-isotopic technique used alone for the identification of the SLN is efficient in melanoma with a 100% detection rate in this short series.     

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The authors report the feasibility and accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymphadenectomy in patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer generally is accepted for its staging and prognostic value, but the extent of dissection remains controversial. Blind lymph node sampling or level I dissection may miss some nodal metastases, but ALND may result in lymphedema. In melanoma, intraoperative lymph node mapping with sentinel lymphadenectomy is an effective and minimally invasive alternative to ALND for identifying nodes containing metastases. METHODS: One hundred seventy-four mapping procedures were performed using a vital dye injected at the primary breast cancer site. Axillary lymphatics were identified and followed to the first ("sentinel") node, which was selectively excised before ALND. RESULTS: Sentinel nodes were identified in 114 of 174 (65.5%) procedures and accurately predicted axillary nodal status in 109 of 114 (95.6%) cases. There was a definite learning curve, and all false-negative sentinel nodes occurred in the first part of the study; sentinel nodes identified in the last 87 procedures were 100% predictive. In 16 of 42 (38.0%) clinically negative/pathologically positive axillae, the sentinel node was the only tumor-involved lymph node identified. The anatomic location of the sentinel node was examined in the 54 most recent procedures; ten cases had only level II nodal metastases that could have been missed by sampling or low (level I) axillary dissection. CONCLUSIONS: This experience indicates that intraoperative lymphatic mapping can accurately identify the sentinel node--i.e., the axillary lymph node most likely to contain breast cancer metastases--in some patients. The technique could enhance staging accuracy and, with further refinements and experience, might alter the role of ALND.     

Sentinel node mapping for breast cancer: the operative experience of a breast surgeon in a rural community

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become an accepted procedure for staging the axilla in early stage breast cancer. Our objectives were to review our practice of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in breast cancer, to determine the impact of frozen section (FS) analysis of the SLN on patient management, and to compare our results to national data. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of our patients with breast cancer who underwent SLN mapping with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) between 1999 and 2006. During this period, 478 patients were treated for breast cancer, with 227 patients undergoing SLN mapping. The SLN was identified in 201 patients, with a positive SLN found in 52 patients (25.9%). There was a discrepancy between the intraoperative analysis (FS/touch prep) and final pathology in 20 patients (11.3%). Nineteen of those patients had a negative FS with positive final pathology. Six of these patients underwent completion ALND. One patient had a false-positive FS with a negative ALND. No axillary recurrences were observed. Eight patients (3.5%) developed postoperative complications. Our practice has been to use intraoperative evaluation of the SLN to reduce the number of patients requiring a secondary ALND. In our study, six patients returned to the operating room for a completion ALND. Our complication rate and axillary recurrence rates were similar to national data.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy During Pregnancy: Initial Clinical Experience

The diagnosis of breast cancer or melanoma in a pregnant patient presents some unique and difficult challenges for both patients and providers. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become an attractive alternative to elective lymphadenectomy procedures for patients with breast cancer and melanoma. However, there is no data on the safety or utility of sentinel node mapping in pregnant patients. Therefore, we reviewed our experience with mapping in gravid patients. Academic institutions throughout North Carolina were asked to contribute cases of mapping performed during pregnancy. A total of nine women underwent sentinel node mapping during pregnancy. All nine were Caucasian with an average age of 32. SLN were found in all cases and mapping procedures were for breast cancer (three), and melanoma (six). There were no adverse reactions to the SLN procedures and one patient developed a seroma at a biopsy site. All went on to have term deliveries without known adverse effects. This limited experience shows that SLN mapping procedures are feasible in pregnant patients. However, this is not a general endorsement of such procedures in pregnant patients. We suggest that potential risks of vital dye or radioactive tracers be clearly explained to the parents when the mother is a candidate for a mapping procedure, and be balanced against the risk of delaying therapy or omitting nodal staging. Presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology meeting in San Diego, California, March 23, 2006     

The Progression of Melanoma Nodal Metastasis Is Dependent on Tumor Thickness of the Primary Lesion

Background: Recent results of several clinical trials using the technique of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy confirm the validity of the concept of there being an order to the progression of melanoma nodal metastases. This report reviews the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center experience with this procedure, one of the largest series described to date. These data demonstrate that the involvement of the SLNs, as well as higher-echelon nodes, is directly proportional to the melanoma tumor thickness, as measured by the method of Breslow.Methods: The investigators at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center retrospectively reviewed their experience using lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsies in the treatment of malignant melanoma. All eligible patients with primary malignant melanomas underwent preoperative and intraoperative mapping of the lymphatic drainage of their primary sites, along with SLN biopsies. All patients with positive SLNs underwent complete regional basin nodal dissection. For 20 consecutive patients with one positive SLN, all of the nodes from the complete lymphadenectomy were serially sectioned and examined by S-100 immunohistochemical analysis, to detect additional metastatic disease.Results: Six hundred ninety-three patients consented to undergo lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy. The SLNs were successfully identified and collected for 688 patients, yielding a 99% success rate. One hundred patients (14.52%) showed evidence of nodal metastasis. The rates of SLN involvement for primary tumors with thicknesses of <0.76 mm, 0.76–1.0 mm, 1.0–1.5 mm, 1.5–4.0 mm, and >4.0 mm were 0%, 5.3%, 8%, 19%, and 29%, respectively. Eighty-one patients underwent complete lymph node dissection after observation of a positive SLN, and only six patients with positive SLNs demonstrated metastatic disease beyond the SLN (7.4%). The tumor thicknesses for these six patients ranged from 2.8 to 6.0 mm. No patient with a tumor thickness of <2.8 mm was found to have evidence of metastatic disease beyond the SLN in complete lymph node dissection. All 20 patients with a positive SLN for whom all of the regional nodes were serially sectioned and examined by S-100 immunohistochemical analysis failed to show additional positive nodes.Conclusions: These results suggest that regional lymph node involvement may be dependent on the thickness of the primary tumor. As the primary tumor thickness increases, so does the likelihood of involvement of SLNs and higher regional nodes in the basin beyond the positive SLNs.Presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of The Society of Surgical Oncology, San Diego, California, March 26–29, 1998.     

Sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of high risk malignant melanoma

In patients with malignant melanoma, the selective biopsy of the first draining lymph node, so-called the sentinel lymph node, allows to identify, with a low morbidity, the patients with nodal metastasis that require radical lymphadenectomy and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Herein, we report our initial experience in sentinel lymph node biopsy in 16 patients with malignant melanoma. The sentinel lymph node was localised using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and injection of dye blue. Intraoperatively, the dissection was guided with a gamma probe and by the recognition of the blue nodes. In the 16 cases the sentinel lymph node was localised. In 50% of the cases, multiple sentinel nodes were demonstrated at lymphoscintigraphy and found during surgery. A limited postoperative morbidity was observed in three cases. Three patients presented nodal metastasis and underwent further radical lymphadenectomy. We conclude that sentinel lymph node mapping is a feasible and reproductive procedure. The preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is essential to identify multiple sentinel nodes and guide surgical dissection. The impact of this approach on the overall survival of patients with high-risk melanoma has still to be demonstrated in studies with a long follow-up.     

Sentinel node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Several studies have explored sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but false negative rates and the loss of pretreatment nodal staging are limitations. Sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to induction chemotherapy may address both. METHODS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in clinically node negative patients prior to initiating chemotherapy. Standard level I/II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed at the time of surgery in those patients who had metastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients had 26 SLNB prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. The SLN was identified in all cases (100%). Twelve patients (48%) were found to be node negative and did not require axillary node dissection after chemotherapy. Of the patients who were SLN positive and underwent completion ALND, residual nodal disease was identified in 60%. There were no surgical complications or delay of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can avoid the morbidity of ALND without compromising the accuracy of axillary staging. It allows for identification of node positive patients subsequently rendered disease free in the regional nodes, which can assist in planning additional chemotherapy or radiation.     

Assessment of value of the sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma in children and adolescents and applicability of subcutaneous infusion anesthesia

Background/Purpose

The management of pediatric melanoma is controversial but equates that of adults. Lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is proposed as standard of care for patients with primary melanoma. The operation can be done with general or local anesthesia in adults. The goal of this study was to determine the applicability of subcutaneous infusion anesthesia (SIA) for SLN biopsy in children and adolescents, as well as to assess complications of this procedure and to document outcome of patients with melanoma in this particular age group after SLN biopsy.

Methods

Charts of patients with melanomas on the trunk and extremities who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy in SIA between November 2000 and January 2006 revealed 13 patients with age 21 years or less. Tumescent solutions with lidocaine (0.2%) were used for SLN biopsy. Patient demographics, tumor thickness, Clark level, location of primary melanoma, ulceration, number of SLNs, number of positive nodes, and follow-up of patients were included.

Results

In 13 patients (age range, 12-21), SLN biopsy was performed. Mean tumor thickness was 1.8 mm (range, 1.0-7.0), none of these melanomas showed ulceration. The operation was tolerated in SIA by all patients; none had any associated complications. Of 13 patients, 5 (38.5%) had positive sentinel nodes. Three patients underwent completion lymph node dissection, and no further positive nodes were found. After a mean follow-up of 29.2 months (range, 13-68), all patients were found disease-free.

Conclusions

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in SIA can safely be performed in children and adolescents with primary melanomas. Further studies are necessary to determine the prognostic information and therapeutic implications of SLN biopsy in this patient group.     

Failure of sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients qualified for treatment sparing axillary lymph nodes—Clinical importance and management strategy—One‐center analysis

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard in diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with nonadvanced invasive breast cancer. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the clinical importance of the failure of sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification during SLNB performed to spare axillary lymph nodes. A total of 5396 patients with invasive breast cancer qualified for SLNB, treated in a period from Jan 2004 to June 2018. All cases of the failure of SLN identification and reasons underlying this situation were analyzed retrospectively. In 196 (3.6%) patients, SLN was not identified (group I), and this resulted in a simultaneous axillary lymph node dissection. 48.5% patients from this group were diagnosed with cancer metastases to lymph nodes (vs 23.6% patients with SLN removed—group II, P < .00001)—stage pN1 in 44.2% of the cases, stage pN2 in 22.1% of the cases, and pN3 in 33.7% (in group II—73.4%, 19.5% and 7.1%, respectively), with a presence of extracapsular infiltration in 68.4% patients (vs 41.7% in group II) and with a significantly higher percentage of micrometastatic nature in group II (17.0%, vs 3.2% in group I). The failure of intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping indicates a significantly increased risk of breast cancer metastases to the axillary lymph system. At the same time, it can also indicate higher cancer stage and its increased aggressiveness. For this reason, in such situation performance of axillary lymph node dissection still appears to be the approach most advantageous for patients.     

Regional Nodal basin control is not compromised by previous sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma

Background Regional nodal basin control is an important goal of lymphadenectomy in the management of melanoma patients with nodal disease. The purpose of this study was to determine if previous sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy compromises the ultimate regional nodal control achieved by subsequent therapeutic lymph node dissection in melanoma patients with microscopic lymph node metastases. Methods A surgical melanoma database and hospital records were reviewed for 602 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent successful lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy between 1991 and 1997. Results A total of 105 (17%) of 602 patients had histologically positive SLNs and were offered therapeutic lymphadenectomy; 101 (96%) underwent this procedure. Thirty-six patients (36%) developed recurrent melanoma at one or more sites. The median follow-up period was 30 months. Recurrence in the previously dissected nodal basin was observed in 10 patients (10%); none had recurrence at only that site. Nodal basin disease appeared after local/in-transit (n=6) or distant (n=1) failure in seven patients and, as a component of the first site of failure, simultaneously with local/in-transit (n=2) or distant (n=1) recurrence in three patients. Conclusions Nodal basin failure after lymphadenectomy in patients who underwent previous biopsy of a histologically positive SLN is primarily a function of aggressive locoregional disease rather than of contamination from previous surgery. Because regional nodal control was comparable with that in other series, we conclude that SLN biopsy with selective lymphadenectomy does not compromise regional nodal basin control. J.E.G. and R.S.B contributed equally to this study. Presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Orlando, Florida, March 4–7, 1999.     

Does the presence of sentinel lymph node macrometastases in breast cancer patients require axillary lymph node dissection?—Single‐center analysis

According to the current guidelines on treatment of breast cancer patients, identification of metastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN (+)) is not an absolute indication for necessary axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In our study, we present long‐term outcomes of treatment among SLN(+) patients referred for conservative treatment, for example, no further ALND. A total of 3145 breast cancer patients subjected to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between November 2008 and June 2015. SLN metastases were identified in 719 patients (22.9%). Locoregional recurrences and distant metastases as endpoints were distinquished. The mean follow‐up time for patients after ALND was 36.2 months (6‐74 months); 18.8 months (6‐38 months) for patients with SLN macrometastases without ALND; and 34.0 months (6‐74 months) for patients with micrometastases. Adjuvant ALND was performed in 626 of SLN(+) patients. Conservative treatment was applied in the remaining 93 cases. Among SLN(+) patients without adjuvant ALND, there was one case of recurrence (1.07%). In the group of patients without SLN, metastases recurrence was noted in 32 patients (1.32%). Among SLN(+) patients diagnosed with macrometastases, recurrence concerned 2.01% of analyzed cases (all subjected to ALND). Lack of radical surgical treatment in SLN(+) breast cancer patients did not lead to worsening long‐term outcomes. In the occurrence of macrometastases to the sentinel lymph node, abandoning completion axillary lymph node dissection might be a reasonable option. However, it would require continuation of current research, preferably involving a clinical trial.     

Lymphatic tumor burden negatively impacts the ability to detect the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the preferred method of nodal breast cancer staging. Techniques of SLN biopsy rely on transport of interstitial molecules through mammary lymphatics. Lymphatic flow may be disrupted by tumor emboli. Increased lymphatic tumor burden may be responsible for failure to identify the sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer. A prospective database of 110 patients who had SLN biopsy between January 2001 and December 2002 was analyzed. The number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes was used as a measure of lymphatic tumor burden. SLN was found in 94 per cent of cases. It was not found in seven patients; five of them had extensive axillary metastases (71%) compared to 23 per cent when SLN was found (P = 0.001). The average number of metastatic lymph nodes was larger when SLN was not found compared to when SLN was found (12.8 vs. 3.9, respectively, P = 0.002). Increasing numbers of metastatic nodes correlated with decreasing success in SLN biopsy (P = 0.075). The incidence of axillary metastases is higher in patients in whom the sentinel node is not found. High lymphatic tumor burden may have a causative role in SLN biopsy technical failure. Axillary dissection should be performed if SLN is not found, regardless of the tumor size or histology.     

内镜黏膜下剥离术联合腹腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术治疗早期胃癌26例分析

目的 探讨内镜黏膜下剥离术（ESD）联合腹腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术治疗早期胃癌的可行性和临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2009年3月至2013年8月期间在江南大学附属医院行ESD联合腹腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术治疗的26例早期胃癌患者的临床资料。对这些患者先行腹腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术,如冰冻病理学检查结果提示有淋巴结转移,则行腹腔镜下胃癌D2根治术;如提示无淋巴结转移,则行ESD。结果 本组26例患者共检出SLN 95枚,（3.7±1.4）枚/例,（1～6枚/例）;有2例患者因SLN阳性而行腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术,24例患者行ESD。26例患者术后随访时间5～46个月,中位随访时间22个月。ESD术后无病生存率（DFS）为91.7% （22/24）,局部复发率为4.2% （1/24）;总体DFS为96.2% （25/26）。结论 ESD治疗早期胃癌是安全、可行的,联合腹腔镜胃癌前哨淋巴结活检术更符合肿瘤根治原则。