Litigation and employment status: effects on patients with chronic pain

In order to study the effects of compensation and litigation, 201 chronic pain patients were selected from a sample of 444: 99 were working, 15 were working and litigating, 53 were receiving Worker's Compensation, and 34 were receiving Worker's Compensation and litigating. Employment (working vs. Worker's Compensation) and litigation status (litigating vs. not litigating) were analyzed in a 2 x 2 factorial design with measures of pain, disability, psychological distress, and selected demographics as dependent variables. Compared to Worker's Compensation patients, working patients reported significantly less disability (down-time, days spent in bed, interference of pain in daily activities) and pain of a longer duration. Compared to litigating patients, non-litigating patients reported less pain (on the McGill Pain Questionnaire) and less disability (stopping activity, interference of pain in daily activities). On two measures of psychological distress (depression, anxiety), there were significant interactions: Worker's Compensation patients who were litigating reported less distress than non-litigants, while working patients who were litigating reported more distress than non-litigants. The results indicate clear differences in self-reports of disability associated with both employment and litigation status. They also suggest that litigation may function as a coping response for patients who are distressed by the adversarial nature of the Worker's Compensation system. Limitations of the study as well as suggestions for further research also are discussed.     

Analyzing pain in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pain coping strategies in patients who have had knee replacement surgery.

This study used the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) to investigate pain coping strategies in 52 rheumatoid arthritis patients who reported having knee pain 1 year or more following knee replacement surgery. Data analysis revealed that, as a group, these patients were active copers in that they reported frequent use of a variety of pain coping strategies. Pain coping strategies were found to be related to measures of pain and adjustment. Patients who rated their ability to control and decrease pain high and who rarely engaged in catastrophizing (i.e., who scored high on the Pain Control and Rational Thinking factor of the CSQ) had much lower levels of pain and psychological disability than patients who did not. Coping strategies were not found to relate to age, gender, obesity status or disability/compensation status. Taken together, these results suggest that an analysis of pain coping strategies may be helpful in understanding pain in arthritis patients who have pain following joint replacement surgery.     

Incidence and predictors of neck and widespread pain after motor vehicle collision among US litigants and nonlitigants

Debate continues regarding the influence of litigation on pain outcomes after motor vehicle collision (MVC). In this study we enrolled European Americans presenting to the emergency department (ED) in the hours after MVC (n = 948). Six weeks later, participants were interviewed regarding pain symptoms and asked about their participation in MVC-related litigation. The incidence and predictors of neck pain and widespread pain 6 weeks after MVC were compared among those engaged in litigation (litigants) and those not engaged in litigation (nonlitigants). Among the 859 of 948 (91%) participants completing 6-week follow-up, 711 of 849 (83%) were nonlitigants. Compared to nonlitigants, litigants were less educated and had more severe neck pain and overall pain, and a greater extent of pain at the time of ED evaluation. Among individuals not engaged in litigation, persistent pain 6 weeks after MVC was common: 199 of 711 (28%) had moderate or severe neck pain, 92 of 711 (13%) had widespread pain, and 29 of 711 (4%) had fibromyalgia-like symptoms. Incidence of all 3 outcomes was significantly higher among litigants. Initial pain severity in the ED predicted pain outcomes among both litigants and nonlitigants. Markers of socioeconomic disadvantage predicted worse pain outcomes in litigants but not nonlitigants, and individual pain and psychological symptoms were less predictive of pain outcomes among those engaged in litigation. These data demonstrate that persistent pain after MVC is common among those not engaged in litigation, and provide evidence for bidirectional influences between pain outcomes and litigation after MVC.     

Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to examine the usefulness of the addition of specific stabilization exercises to a general back and abdominal muscle exercise approach for patients with subacute or chronic nonspecific back pain by comparing a specific muscle stabilization-enhanced general exercise approach with a general exercise-only approach. SUBJECTS: Fifty-five patients with recurrent, nonspecific back pain (stabilization-enhanced exercise group: n=29, general exercise-only group: n=26) and no clinical signs suggesting spinal instability were recruited. METHODS: Both groups received an 8-week exercise intervention and written advice (The Back Book). Outcome was based on self-reported pain (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire), disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), and cognitive status (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Locus of Control Scale) measured immediately before and after intervention and 3 months after the end of the intervention period. RESULTS: Outcome measures for both groups improved. Furthermore, self-reported disability improved more in the general exercise-only group immediately after intervention but not at the 3-month follow-up. There were generally no differences between the 2 exercise approaches for any of the other outcomes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A general exercise program reduced disability in the short term to a greater extent than a stabilization-enhanced exercise approach in patients with recurrent nonspecific low back pain. Stabilization exercises do not appear to provide additional benefit to patients with subacute or chronic low back pain who have no clinical signs suggesting the presence of spinal instability.     

Unraveling the effects of compensation, litigation, and employment on treatment response in chronic pain

Although it has often been suggested that chronic pain patients who are receiving workmen's compensation or who have litigation pending are less likely to benefit from treatment, the results of outcome studies of this question conducted by various pain clinics have been inconsistent. We hypothesized that poorer outcome in such patients may be related to the fact that they are less likely to be working and that the inconsistent results in the literature may therefore be explained by variability among studies in the percentages of patients who are receiving compensation (or who have litigation pending) who are also working. We examined the relationships among compensation, litigation, employment, and short- and long-term treatment response in a series of 454 chronic pain patients. Compensation benefits and employment status both predicted poorer short-term outcome in univariate analyses; however, when employment and compensation were jointly used to predict outcome in multiple regression analyses, only employment was significant. In additional analyses, only employment significantly predicted long-term outcome, whereas compensation and litigation did not. Our results suggest that it would be valuable to redirect attention away from the deleterious effects of the 'compensation neurosis' and toward the roles of activity and employment in the treatment and rehabilitation of chronic pain patients.     

The role of litigation in predicting disability outcomes in chronic pain patients.

This study examined the extent to which being involved in civil and industrial litigation predicted outcome in an population of chronic pain patients. Data were collected in a structured telephone interview for a litigant group of 80 patients and a nonlitigant group of 47 patients. There were no significant differences in the amount of medication used, the number of hours spent resting per day, or the number of individuals who were able to return to work. Litigants showed significantly higher levels of depression. Multiple regression analyses indicated that litigation was not the primary predictor of downtime or medication use. Litigation was found to be the primary predictor of Zung depression scores. Discriminant function analyses indicated that litigation was not the most important variable in distinguishing between those working and not working. Results lend support to previous studies that suggest that the suspicion and disbelief with which litigating patients are often treated is unfounded.     

Group cognitive behavioural interventions for low back pain in primary care: extended follow-up of the Back Skills Training Trial (ISRCTN54717854)

Group cognitive behavioural intervention (CBI) is effective in reducing low back pain and disability over a 12-month period, in comparison to best practice advice in primary care. The aim was to study the effects of this CBI beyond 12 months. We undertook an extended follow-up of our original randomised, controlled trial of a group CBI and best practice advice in primary care, in comparison to best practice advice alone. Participants were mailed a questionnaire including measures of disability, pain, health services resource use, and health-related quality of life. The time of extended follow-up ranged between 20 and 50 months (mean 34 months). Fifty-six percent (395 of 701) of the original cohort provided extended follow-up. Those who responded were older and had less disability and pain at baseline than did the original trial cohort. After 12 months, the improvements in pain and disability observed with CBI were sustained. For disability measures, the treatment difference in favour of CBI persisted (mean difference 1.3 Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire points, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 2.26; 5.5 Modified von Korff Scale disability points, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 10.64). There was no between-group difference in Modified von Korff Scale pain outcomes. The results suggest that the effects of a group CBI are maintained up to an average of 34 months. Although pain improves in response to best practice advice, longer-term recovery of disability remains substantially less.     

Chronic pain and posttraumatic stress symptoms in litigating motor vehicle accident victims

OBJECTIVE: There has been little research examining chronic pain and posttraumatic stress symptoms in persons injured in motor vehicle accidents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in physical injury and impairment, psychological distress, and pain coping strategies in litigating chronic pain patients low and high in motor vehicle accident-related posttraumatic stress symptoms. DESIGN: A total of 160 consecutive chronic pain patients referred for psychological-legal assessment underwent semistructured interview and testing. The testing battery included the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2, the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, the Sickness Impact Profile, and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Using the sample-specific median split of 18 posttraumatic stress symptoms on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder scale, chronic pain patients were categorized as evidencing low or high levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms. RESULTS: The findings indicate that participants evidencing high posttraumatic stress symptoms had more physical impairment, psychological distress, and maladaptive pain coping strategies and were more likely to be treated with antidepressants, other medications, and psychological management than participants evidencing low posttraumatic stress symptoms. A discriminant function analysis was performed using the full combination of physical injury and impairment, psychological distress, and pain coping variables in the prediction of posttraumatic stress symptom-defined group membership. The resulting discriminant function accounted for 61% of the between-group variance and correctly classified 92% of participants who were low in posttraumatic stress symptoms and 88% of participants who were high in posttraumatic stress symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain and posttraumatic stress symptoms in litigating motor vehicle accident victims are associated with increased physical and psychological morbidity.     

Nonneurologic hand pain versus carpal tunnel syndrome: do psychological measures differentiate?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether psychological measures would differentiate a group of patients with physician-diagnosed nonneurologic hand pain from patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Many patients, who also displayed symptoms of psychological distress, were referred to an electrodiagnostic clinic with a diagnosis of possible CTS; they subsequently had normal nerve conduction studies. DESIGN: Sixty patients with hand pain were referred to either of two university clinics for electrophysiologic testing, were assigned to either the CTS or nonneurologic group, and were compared on a series of psychometric tests. RESULTS: The Beck Depression Inventory and McGill Pain Questionnaire showed that the physician-assigned nonneurologic patients have a greater degree of depression, use more affective adjectives, and choose more words on the McGill Pain Questionnaire than the physician-assigned CTS group. The nonneurologic group also scored higher on indices of self-reported disability on the Pain Disability Inventory in five of seven categories. Although the CTS group perceived more control over their pain, no differences were observed in the types of coping strategies used on the Coping Strategy Questionnaire. Finally, the nonneurologic group had more Workers' Compensation Board claims. CONCLUSION: Evidence of important psychological issues in some patients with hand pain suggests a need for greater awareness among treating physicians.     

悬吊运动训练对成人特发性脊柱侧弯慢性腰背疼痛的康复效果

目的观察悬吊运动训练治疗成人特发性脊柱侧弯慢性腰背疼痛的效果。方法将38例成人特发性脊柱侧弯患者采用年龄、性别匹配方法分成治疗组和对照组,治疗4周,使用疼痛数字评分(NRS)、Oswestry腰痛调查表,分别在治疗开始前、治疗4周后进行评估。结果治疗组能明显减轻腰痛,效果明显优于对照组(P<0.01)。结论悬吊运动训练技术可以有效减轻成人特发性脊柱侧弯患者慢性腰背疼痛。     

The impact of low back pain on work: A study in primary care consulters

Background: The cost of low back pain (LBP) to employers is high, with an estimated £9090 million lost in the United Kingdom in 1998. Economic analysis of LBP has focused on work absence among the employed. There is little research characterising individuals who report reduced duties or who are not in employment because of LBP. Aims: To compare the health related characteristics of primary care LBP consulters reporting usual employment, reduced duties, sick leave and non‐employment as a result of LBP. Methods: Prospective cohort study recruiting LBP consulters aged 30–59 years of age from five general practices in North Staffordshire. Results: Nine hundred and thirty‐five participants completed the baseline phase, 65% were in employment and 35% were not in employment. Of the employed participants over 1 in 10 (11%) were undertaking reduced duties and almost one‐fifth were reporting sick leave (22%). Furthermore, 37% of non‐employed consulters reported that LBP was the reason for non‐employment. Significant differences at baseline in socioeconomic status, self‐rated health, anxiety, depression and disability were found between those undertaking their usual job, those on reduced duties and those on sickness absence due to LBP, with those participants further removed from the work force reporting worse health across all measures. Significant differences were also found in self‐rated health between those not working due to LBP and those not working for other reasons, with participants not working due to LBP reporting worse self‐rated health. At follow‐up, work status was found to be relatively stable. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the economic impact of LBP may be higher than previously estimated when data on reduced duties is combined with work absence. The additional impact of unemployment due to LBP should also be included in future assessments of the impact of LBP on the workforce.     

Return to work and health-related quality of life after burn injury.

OBJECTIVE: Although severe burn injury is associated with long-term rehabilitation and disability, research on returning to work in burn patients is limited. The aims of this study were: (i) to explore injury- and personality-related predictors of returning to work, and (ii) to compare health-related quality of life and health outcome in working versus non-working individuals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Forty-eight former patients with pre-burn employment were evaluated on average 3.8 years after the burn. METHODS: Data were collected from medical records and by a questionnaire in which the patients were asked about their main activity status described in the terms: work, studies, pension, disability pension, sick leave or unemployment. It also contained the Swedish universities Scales of Personality, SF-36, Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief, items assessing fear-avoidance, Impact of Event Scale-Revised and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent had not returned to work. In logistic regression, returning to work was associated with time since injury, the extent of full-thickness injuries, and the personality trait embitterment. Those who did not work had lower health-related quality of life, poorer burn-specific health, more fear-avoidance and more symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, but they did not differ from those who were working regarding general mood. CONCLUSION: Returning to work was explained by both injury severity and personality characteristics. Those who did not work were characterized by low health-related quality of life and poorer trauma-related physical and psychological health.     

216例慢性非特异性腰痛患者的康复疗效观察

目的观察不同治疗手段对慢性非特异性腰痛的临床疗效。方法对246例慢性非特异性腰痛患者随机分成对照组(n=82)、家庭指导组(n=82)和强化治疗组(n=82)进行治疗,使用数字类比疼痛评分法、改良Oswestry腰痛调查表,分别在治疗开始前、治疗后1个月、3个月和6个月进行评估。结果家庭指导组和强化治疗组均能减轻腰痛,且强化治疗组疗效更好。结论以主动运动训练为核心的现代康复治疗技术可有效改善慢性非特异性腰痛患者的症状。     

Chronic pain,work performance and litigation

The overall population impact of chronic pain on work performance has been underestimated as it has often been described in terms of work-related absence, excluding more subtle effects that chronic pain may have on the ability to work effectively. Additionally, most studies have focussed on occupational and/or patient cohorts and treatment seeking, rather than sampling from the general population. We undertook a population-based random digit dialling computer-assisted telephone survey with participants randomly selected within households in order to measure the impact of chronic pain on work performance. In addition, we measured the association between pain-related disability and litigation. The study took place in Northern Sydney Health Area, a geographically defined urban area of New South Wales, Australia, and included 484 adults aged 18 or over with chronic pain. The response rate was 73.4%. Working with pain was more common (on an average 83.8 days in 6 months) than lost work days due to pain (4.5 days) among chronic pain participants in full-time or part-time employment. When both lost work days and reduced-effectiveness work days were summed, an average of 16.4 lost work day equivalents occurred in a 6-month period, approximately three times the average number of lost work days. In multiple logistic regression modelling with pain-related disability as the dependent variable, past or present pain-related litigation had the strongest association (odds ratio (OR)=3.59, P=0.001). In conclusion, chronic pain had a larger impact on work performance than has previously been recognised, related to reduced performance while working with pain. A significant proportion were able to work effectively with pain, suggesting that complete relief of pain may not be an essential therapeutic target. Litigation (principally work-related) for chronic pain was strongly associated with higher levels of pain-related disability, even after taking into account other factors associated with poor functional outcomes.     

Dimensions of catastrophic thinking associated with pain experience and disability in patients with neuropathic pain conditions

The objective of the present study was to examine the relative contributions of different dimensions of catastrophic thinking (i.e. rumination, magnification, helplessness) to the pain experience and disability associated with neuropathic pain. Eighty patients with diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, post-surgical or post-traumatic neuropathic pain who had volunteered for participation in a clinical trial formed the basis of the present analyses. Spontaneous pain was assessed with the sensory and affective subscales of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pinprick hyperalgesia and dynamic tactile allodynia were used as measures of evoked pain. Consistent with previous research, individuals who scored higher on a measure of catastrophic thinking (Pain Catastrophizing Scale; PCS) also rated their pain as more intense, and rated themselves to be more disabled due to their pain. Follow up analyses revealed that the PCS was significantly correlated with the affective subscale of the MPQ but not with the sensory subscale. The helplessness subscale of the PCS was the only dimension of catastrophizing to contribute significant unique variance to the prediction of pain. The PCS was not significantly correlated with measures of evoked pain. Catastrophizing predicted pain-related disability over and above the variance accounted for by pain severity. The findings are discussed in terms of mechanisms linking catastrophic thinking to pain experience. Treatment implications are addressed.     

Pain center follow-up study of treated and untreated patients

To investigate the outcome of patients treated in a multidisciplinary pain clinic, patients previously treated in the center and patients who had been eligible for, but did not desire such treatment, were contacted by phone. Their current life and pain status were assessed using a structured interview format. Fourteen individuals in each group agreed to participate in the study. The groups did not differ significantly on variables of sex, age, time since referral, marital status, premorbid income, and type of pain. Analysis of differences in discomfort level for the treated group revealed a 47% decrease from a mean of 7.02 to 3.67 (10-point scale). The telephone contact occurred approximately 2 1/2 years following initial referral. There were no statistical differences in current pain levels, number of pain-related visits to health professionals, pain-related expenses, employment status, disability status, history of pain-related litigation, use of medications, or frequency of pain-related surgeries since referral. Patients treated in the pain clinic were significantly more likely to use active, self-control strategies to manage pain than were individuals in the control group. Use of such strategies, however, was limited. The data suggest that outcome studies of pain patients should include control groups treated by other modalities or who receive no treatment; that maintenance of treatment goals is compromised by compliance problems; and that more comprehensive cost effectiveness studies of chronic pain treatment are needed.     

Educational achievement and chronic pain disability: mediating role of pain-related cognitions

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relation between level of educational achievement (LOE) and the clinical morbidity associated with chronic pain. SETTING: a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program located within a university hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred ninety-nine consecutive patients with chronic spinal pain, average age 39.6 years (SD = 10.7) and with an average duration of pain of 41.9 months (SD = 51.6). OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, duration of pain, sex, and compensation and litigation status were controlled for in the statistical analysis because each was found to be significantly associated with LOE. Pain intensity was assessed by the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Affective distress was assessed by the Global Severity Index from the Brief Symptom Inventory. Severity of depressive symptoms was derived from scores from the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale. Pain beliefs and pain coping strategies were assessed by the Survey of Pain Attitudes and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, respectively. Finally, self-report of pain-related disability was assessed by the Pain Disability Index. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for relevant covariates, LOE was unrelated to pain intensity, severity of depressive symptoms, or affective distress, but was inversely related to self-reported disability. Persons with lower LOEs possessed a greater belief that pain is a "signal of harm," unrelated to emotional experience, disabling and uncontrollable. They also endorsed more passive and maladaptive coping strategies, including a tendency to catastrophize about their pain. Path analysis indicated that, after controlling for the influence of both the belief that pain is a "signal of harm" and catastrophizing on the association between LOE and disability, this relation loses statistical significance. These results suggest that pain-related cognitions mediate the relation between LOE and pain disability and that persons with lower LOEs are more likely to develop maladaptive pain beliefs and coping strategies.     

Responding and failing to respond to both hypnosis and a kinesthetic illusion, Chevreul's Pendulum

In this study, participants who failed to exhibit pendulum movement in response to Chevreul's Pendulum (CP) instructions had lower Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form A (SHSS:A) scores and reported experiencing less subjective response to hypnosis than did their counterparts who exhibited CP movement. However, intensity scores on Shor's Personal Experiences Questionnaire (PEQ) did not differ between pass- and fail-CP groups. Additionally, pass-CP participants showed positive correlations between PEQ intensity scores and hypnotizability scores, while fail-CP participants showed negative correlations among these measures. These findings are consistent with the notion that CP failure may reflect a situation-specific unwillingness to become imaginatively involved rather than a general inability to do so. Additional analyses revealed that 5 of 10 participants who had failed the CP task scored 0 or 1 on the SHSS:A, while only 3 of 65 pass-CP participants scored 0 or 1.