Breech presentation after cesarean section: always a section?

A retrospective review of 71 breech deliveries after previous cesarean was done to determine the need for repeat cesarean section. Twenty-four (33.8%) women were allocated to the elective repeat cesarean section group and forty-seven (66.2%) patients were allocated to a trial of labor group. Thirty-seven (78.7%) were delivered of their infants vaginally. A total of 37 of the 71 women (52.1%) had successful vaginal deliveries. Neonatal morbidity did not differ for women who were delivered vaginally or by cesarean section. Maternal febrile morbidity was significantly higher in the cesarean section group than in the vaginal delivery group (p less than 0.001). On the basis of these data, a trial of labor seems reasonable in carefully selected cases of breech presentation after a previous cesarean section.     

The influence of the mode of anaesthesia in the incidence of neonatal morbidity after an elective caesarean section

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: We conducted a study of all the cases of elective caesarean section over a three-year period from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2004, with the aim to compare general, epidural and spinal anaesthesia in respect to the incidence of neonatal respiratory morbidity. METHODS: It is an area-based retrospective study of all mothers who underwent elective caesarean section and delivered singleton infants at term gestation. Neonatal respiratory morbidity was recorded and compared between infants delivered with different anaesthetic techniques for caesarean section and those delivered vaginally. RESULTS: The rates of documented respiratory morbididy did not relate significantly to the anaesthesia mode (p > 0.05). Infants who were delivered at term by elective caesarean section were more likely to have respiratory problems than those who were delivered vaginally (8.1% vs 1.3%), p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The different anaesthesia techniques in elective caesarean section do not seem to influence neonatal respiratory morbidity.     

Rupture and dehiscence of cesarean section scar during pregnancy and delivery

A prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the risk of uterine rupture or dehiscence after cesarean section. During the 10 years of the study, 24,644 patients were delivered of infants. Of these women, 2036 (8.3%) had previously undergone cesarean section. A trial of labor was allowed in 1008 of these patients, and 92.2% were delivered vaginally. The incidence of uterine rupture in this trial of labor group was 0.6%, compared with 0.4% in the total group. Cesarean section scar rupture caused no serious complications in either the mothers or the offspring in the trial of labor group. Uterine rupture in this group was not associated with use of oxytocin or epidural analgesia. Patients with lower-segment scar rupture had no history of puerperal pyrexia. The incidence of uterine dehiscence was 4%. In summary, the risk of uterine rupture in patients who have previously undergone cesarean section but are allowed a trial of labor is low and not associated with serious complications. Vaginal delivery is therefore considered the safest route of delivery in these patients.     

Increased immunoreactive erythropoietin in cord plasma and neonatal bilirubin production in normal term infants after labor

The purpose of this investigation was to compare immunoreactive erythropoietin levels in umbilical cord plasma and neonatal bilirubin production in infants born of normal women who delivered with or without labor. Two groups of term (38 to 42 weeks) singleton pregnancies were compared: 1) those delivered by repeat elective cesarean section without prior labor (N = 17), and 2) those delivered vaginally or by cesarean section after labor (N = 24). None of the infants was asphyxiated, and there was no difference in Apgar scores between the no-labor and labor groups. The cord plasma erythropoietin levels were lower in the infants of women who had repeat elective cesarean section without labor than in those whose mothers had labor before delivery (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P less than .025). The median erythropoietin for the no-labor group was 22.9 mU/mL compared with 38.8 mU/mL for the labor group. The pulmonary excretion rate of carbon monoxide (VeCO), an index of bilirubin production, for the no-labor group was 14.3 +/- 6.2 SD microL/kg per hour compared with 18.0 +/- 4.9 SD microL/kg per hour for the labor group (P less than .05). The hemoglobin concentration for the no-labor group was 16.0 +/- 1.5 SD g/dL compared with 17.7 +/- 2.2 SD g/dL for the labor group (P less than .05). The VeCO correlated with the hemoglobin concentration (N = 32, r = 0.37, P less than .05). The results of the present study suggest that labor is normally associated with increases in the cord plasma erythropoietin level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean section and forceps delivery rates

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of introducing epidural analgesia for labor pain relief on the primary cesarean and forceps delivery rates. STUDY DESIGN: The control group consisted of 1,720 women who delivered on a charity hospital service between September 1, 1992, and August 31, 1993; epidural analgesia was not available for this cohort of patients. The study group consisted of 1,442 patients who delivered on the same service between September 1, 1993, and August 31, 1994; elective epidural analgesia for labor pain relief was available for this cohort of patients. A computerized obstetric database was analyzed to compare the two groups regarding demographics, parity, pregnancy complications, labor characteristics, type of delivery, low birth weight incidence and five-minute Apgar scores. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to demographics and pregnancy complications. No control group patient received epidural analgesia for labor pain relief; 734 of 1,285 (57%) laboring patients in the study group elected epidural analgesia for pain relief. The primary cesarean delivery rate for the control group was 9.6% and for the study group 11.0% (not statistically significant). The control group had 34 (2.0%) forceps deliveries and the study group, 88 (6.1%), for a statistically significant difference. There were significantly more vaginal births after cesarean in the study group (42 vs. 26). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was not associated with an increase in the primary cesarean delivery rate but was associated with an increase in the operative vaginal delivery rate.     

Perinatal heart rate variability and circulatory adaptation in association with normal labor and after elective cesarean section

Heart rate variability and basal hemodynamic parameters were studied in connection with 20 normal deliveries and after 16 elective cesarean sections. Eight of the cesarean sections were performed with the use of maternal barbiturate anesthesia and eight with the use of epidural blockade. The interval index describing the long-term variability and the differential index describing the short-term variability of the heart rate were measured continuously from 10-minute samples of a direct fetal electrocardiogram and a neonatal electrocardiogram of the infants by a microprocessor-based system. In association with normal labor, significant increases in both indices of variability were observed during the second stage of labor and during the first 2 hours of extrauterine life. After elective cesarean section both indices of neonatal heart rate variability remained significantly lower than those after normal labor. However, a significant increase was observed in the differential index of the infants delivered with the use of epidural blockade. During the neonatal period, simultaneous recordings of basal heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and rectal and heel temperatures were made at 10-minute intervals. The basal neonatal heart rate was significantly higher in both cesarean section subgroups compared with that after normal labor. A significant decrease in basal neonatal heart rate during the second hour of life was observed after normal labor and after cesarean section with the use of epidural blockade. Systolic blood pressures in newborn infants delivered with the use of maternal epidural blockade were equal to those after normal labor, but higher than those after cesarean section with barbiturate anesthesia. Newborn infants after elective cesarean section had significantly lower diastolic blood pressures than infants delivered normally, but there was no difference in the diastolic blood pressures between the two cesarean section subgroups. The infants delivered vaginally had lower heel temperatures than those delivered abdominally. According to the present study, the neonatal circulatory adaptation after elective cesarean section is different from that after normal delivery; however, the neonatal hemodynamics after cesarean section with epidural blockade more closely resemble the situation after normal labor.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an historic cohort cost analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery compared with elective repeat cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an historic cohort analysis of women with a single prior cesarean delivery who were delivered at our institution during 1999. Inclusion criteria were > or =36 weeks' gestation and carrying a live, singleton fetus with no antenatally diagnosed anomalies. The primary outcome variable was mean cost of hospital care for mother-infant pairs, as obtained from the hospital's Clinical Resources Department. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 204 mother-infant pairs, 65 in the elective repeat cesarean group and 139 in the attempted vaginal birth group. Mean cost of care was higher for mothers ($4155 vs $3675;P <.001), neonates ($1794 vs $1187; P =.03), and mother-infant pairs ($5949 vs $4863; P =.001) for the elective repeat cesarean group compared with the attempted vaginal delivery group. CONCLUSION: In women with a single prior cesarean delivery, a trial of labor is more cost-effective than an elective repeat cesarean delivery.     

Effects of Epidural Analgesia: Some Questions and Answers

ABSTRACT: The effects of epidural analgesia on first labors have been studied by Thorp and colleagues (1,2). One study has been published (3) and is the subject of a question-and-answer discussion, presented here. In this study 711 consecutive nulliparous women at term, with spontaneous onset of labor and cephalic presentation, were divided into one group (n = 447) who received epidural analgesia in labor and another group (n = 264) who received narcotics or no analgesia. The frequency of cesarean section for dystocia was significantly greater (p < 0.005) in the epidural group (10.3%) than in the nonepidural group (3.8%), even after selection bias was corrected and the variables of maternal age and race; gestational age; cervical dilatation on admission; use, duration, and maximum infusion rate of oxytocin; labor duration; presence of meconium; and birth weight were controlled. For both groups the frequency of cesarean section for fetal distress was similar (p < 0.20), and the frequency of low Apgar scores at 5 minutes and cord blood gas values showed no significant differences. The authors concluded that “epidural analgesia in labor may increase the incidence of cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women’(3).     

Vaginal birth after cesarean section at the University of Texas.

Vaginal delivery was successful in 76% of the 242 women who underwent a trial of labor after cesarean section in a prior pregnancy. Separation of the uterine scar occurred in four women (1.7%). Women whose prior cesarean section was for breech presentation had the highest rate of successful vaginal delivery (86%). The vaginal delivery rates were similar in women who delivered infants with birth weights > or = 4,000 g (73%) and < 4,000 g (76%). The use of epidural anesthesia and oxytocin may enhance the success of vaginal delivery in women undergoing a trial of labor following an earlier cesarean section.     

The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women

Epidural analgesia in labor is generally accepted as safe and effective and therefore has become increasingly popular. However, little is known regarding the effect of epidural analgesia on the incidence of cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. During the first 6 months of 1987 we studied 711 consecutive nulliparous women at term, with cephalic fetal presentations and spontaneous onset of labor. Comparison of 447 patients who received epidural analgesia in labor with 264 patients who received either narcotics or no analgesia was performed. The incidence of cesarean section for dystocia was significantly greater (p less than 0.005) in the epidural group (10.3%) than in the nonepidural group (3.8%). There remained a significantly increased incidence (p less than 0.005) of cesarean section for dystocia in the epidural group after selection bias was corrected and the following confounding variables were controlled by multivariate analysis: maternal age, race, gestational age, cervical dilatation on admission, use of oxytocin, duration of oxytocin use, maximum infusion rate of oxytocin, duration of labor, presence of meconium, and birth weight. The incidence of cesarean section for fetal distress was similar (p greater than 0.20) in both groups. There were no clinically significant differences in frequency of low Apgar scores at 5 minutes or cord arterial and venous blood gas parameters between the two groups. This study suggests that epidural analgesia in labor may increase the incidence of cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women.     

Vaginal birth after cesarean section: results of a multicenter study

Cesarean section is now the most frequently performed major operation in the United States. Nearly one out of every four American babies is delivered by this operation. "Elective repeat" has become the most common indication for cesarean section. Although the safety of vaginal birth after cesarean section has been documented in several recent publications, automatic repeat cesarean section remains the rule in this country. We present one of the largest series of trial of labor ever reported. Of 57,553 live births, 4929 (8.6%) were of women with prior cesarean sections. Among 1776 patients who underwent a trial of labor, 1314 (74%) delivered vaginally. There was no maternal or perinatal mortality related to uterine scar rupture. Thus during the study period 1314 major operations were avoided. We conclude that, for the vast majority of women, allowing a trial of labor is a safe alternative to automatic elective repeat cesarean section.     

A comparison of the effect of epidural, general, and no anesthesia on funic acid-base values by stage of labor and type of delivery

The effect of epidural anesthesia on neonatal acid-base status, before, during, and after labor, was determined by review of funic blood-gas values from 142 women with normal term pregnancies and normal fetal heart rate patterns. Funic acid-base parameters were compared by type of anesthesia when stratified by mode of delivery (vaginal, cesarean section in the active phase of labor, or elective cesarean section). Use of epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery was associated with significantly longer labor, lower umbilical arterial pH, higher arterial PCO2 and arterial bicarbonate values. In women who had cesarean section in the active phase of labor, use of epidural anesthesia was associated with significantly lower arterial and venous PO2 values when compared with women who received general anesthesia. Patients who had elective cesarean section with epidural anesthesia had funic acid-base values similar to women who had general anesthesia. Epidural analgesia-anesthesia offers no clear advantage to the uncompromised term fetus.     

Relationship Between Obstetric Analgesia and time of Effective Breast Feeding

The Infant Breast-feeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) was used to assess the time of effective breast feeding in 48 healthy term infants born to mothers having their first or second baby. Infants of mothers who received an analgesia (butorphanol or nalbuphine) in labor (n = 26) were compared with infants whose mothers did not receive any labor analgesia (n = 22). Timing of the administration of labor analgesia was also examined with infants whose mothers received no analgesia or analgesia within an hour of birth compared with infants whose mothers received analgesia more than one hour before birth. Infants of first-time breast-feeding mothers took longer to establish effective feeding compared with infants of second-time breast-feeding mothers. Male infants also took longer. Labor analgesia significantly affected mother-rated IBFAT scores when initiation time was considered. Infants who received analgesia within an hour of birth, or no analgesia, and who initiated breast feeding early, established effective feeding significantly earlier than infants with longer duration of analgesia and later initiation of breast feeding.     

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery with a lower-segment, vertical uterine incision: Is it safe?

Objective: Our purpose was to assess maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor and attempted vaginal birth after prior low-segment vertical cesarian delivery.Study design: During a 10-year period in a single tertiary hospital, all patients with a prior low-segment uterine incision (whether vertical or transverse) were considered candidates for a trial of labor in the absence of other contraindications or patient refusal. Among the 1137 women who underwent low-segment vertial cesarean delivery, 262 were subsequently delivered of 322 live-born infants, and 174 (54%) of them were identified retrospectively as having attempted vaginal birth. The maternal and perinatal outcomes of patients who did or did not undergo a trial of labor were analyzed and compared.Results: No significant differences between the two patient groups were observed regarding demographic characteristics, antepartum complications, gestational age at delivery (mean 37.4 weeks), birth weight, and cord pH at delivery. Vaginal delivery was accomplished successfully in 144 of 174 (83%) patients who underwent a trial of labor. Abdominal delivery was necessary for 17 mothers with labor disorders and 13 with suspected fetal distress. Postpartum hemorrhage occurred more often in the trial of labor group (7/174 [4.0%] vs 2/148 [1.4%], p not significant), but endometritis developed significantly more often in patients with elective repeat cesarean delivery (16.9% vs 6.3%, p - 0.006)/ Rupture of the low-segment vertical cesarean group scar occurred in 2 patients during a trial of labor (1.1%) versus none in the elective repeat cesarean group. Neither mother experienced fetal extrusion or adverse maternal or fetal sequelae. Frequency of serious neonatal complications (8.1% vs 10%) and neonatal mortality (1.7% vs 2.0%) were similar between groups. All neonatal deaths were a result of extreme prematurity or congenital anomalies.Conclusions: Our experience indicates that a mother with a prior low-segment vertical cesarean delivery can undertake a trial of labor with relative maternal-perinata safety. The likelihood of successful outcome and the incidence of complications are comparable to those of published experience with a trial of labor after a previous low-segment transverse incision.     

Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes after elective repeat Cesarean section versus a trial of labor in women after one prior uterine scar. STUDY DESIGN: All women with a previous single low transverse Cesarean section delivered at term with no contraindications to vaginal delivery were retrospectively identified in our database from January 1995 to October 1998. Outcomes were first analyzed by comparing mother-neonate dyads delivered by elective repeat Cesarean section to those undergoing a trial of labor. Secondarily, outcomes of mother-neonatal dyads who achieved a vaginal delivery or failed a trial of labor were compared to those who had elective repeat Cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Of 1408 deliveries, 749/927 (81%) had a successful vaginal birth after a prior Cesarean delivery. There were no differences in the rates of transfusion, infection, uterine rupture and operative injury when comparing trial of labor versus elective repeat Cesarean delivery. Neonates delivered by elective repeat Cesarean delivery were of earlier gestation and had higher rates of respiratory complications (p < 0.05). Mother-neonatal dyads with a failed trial of labor sustained the greatest risk of complications. CONCLUSION: Overall, neonatal and maternal outcomes compared favorably among women undergoing a trial of labor versus elective repeat Cesarean delivery. The majority of morbidity was associated with a failed trial of labor. Better selection of women likely to have a successful vaginal birth after a prior Cesarean delivery would be expected to decrease the risks of trial of labor.     

Epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. The effect of morphine-bupivacaine administered epidurally for intra and postoperative pain relief

Two groups of mothers who underwent elective cesarean section under epidural analgesia, were studied with the aim of comparing the analgesic potency and side effects of two solutions: morphine-bupivacaine and morphine-saline. Each group comprised 100 patients. The intraoperative anesthesia was established with bupivacaine plain, 5 mg/ml, in amount 85-125 mg. Immediately after the infant was delivered, the mothers received a single epidural dose of 3 mg of preservative-free morphine chloride mixed with either 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (Group I) or 0.9% saline (Group II). The intraoperative observations showed "good effect" without need for supplementation of analgesia in 82 mothers in Group I, compared with 61 mothers in Group II (p less than 0.001). The postoperative observations showed that 82 mothers in Group I were satisfied with a single dose of morphine for more than 24 hours, while in Group II the corresponding number was 63 (p less than 0.01). A significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting was found between the groups; 7 of the mothers experienced nausea and 4 vomited in Group I and 17 experienced nausea and 13 vomited in Group II (p less than 0.05, for both variables). Respiratory depression was seen in one mother during surgery immediately after supplementation of morphine-bupivacaine analgesia with ketamine. Other side effects, such as itching, bradycardia and Horner's triad were rare. It may be concluded that a single epidural dose of morphine in bupivacaine will augment intraoperative analgesia and prolong postoperative analgesia. Less favorable results were obtained when morphine in saline was used. Synergism between bupivacaine and morphine is suggested.     

Neonatal impact of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term: a comment on patient choice cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to compare neonatal outcomes of term uncomplicated pregnancies delivered by scheduled repeat cesarean with outcomes of babies born to mothers intending to deliver vaginally. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study describes neonatal outcomes of term uncomplicated pregnancies. Neonates of mothers intending to deliver vaginally (n = 3134) are compared with neonates born by elective repeat cesarean delivery prior to labor (n = 117). RESULTS: Neonates born by elective repeat cesarean are more frequently admitted to advanced care nurseries than infants born to mothers intending to deliver vaginally (risk ratio 3.58, 95% confidence interval 3.35-3.58). CONCLUSION: The decision to undergo scheduled cesarean delivery appears to negatively impact immediate neonatal outcomes.     

The effect of cesarean section on intraventricular hemorrhage in the preterm infant.

OBJECTIVE: The null hypothesis is that active labor is a more important factor with regard to both timing and progression of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage than is route of delivery. Infants delivered by cesarean section after entering the active phase of labor will behave in a manner similar to that of previously studied infants delivered vaginally as to when periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage occurs and frequency of progression. STUDY DESIGN: The 106 infants of 85 women delivered by cesarean section were the subjects of this study. Forty-six infants were in the no-labor group, 33 in the latent-phase labor group, and 27 in the active-phase labor group. Head ultrasonographic examinations were performed at delivery, at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours, and then daily for the first 7 days of life. Continuous variables were compared by one-way analysis of variance among those infants with no hemorrhage or with periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage. Categoric variables were compared by chi 2 analysis and Fisher's exact test when appropriate. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There was no difference in the frequency of early hemorrhage (less than or equal to 1 hour of age), late hemorrhage (greater than 1 hour of age), or overall periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage in the infants not in labor, in latent-phase labor, or in active-phase labor at the time of cesarean section. However, the frequency of grade 3 or 4 hemorrhage and the progression of hemorrhage were significantly higher in the infants whose mothers had an active phase of labor compared with infants whose mothers had no labor or did not progress beyond the latent phase. Infants who had early periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage (less than or equal to 1 hour of age) also had a higher frequency of progression of hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean section before the active phase of labor does not change the overall frequency of hemorrhage but results in a lower frequency of progression to grade 3 or 4 hemorrhage. We do not feel that these data support performing more cesarean sections for preterm delivery as a method of preventing progression of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage in the preterm infant.     

Epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia: risk factors in nulliparas.

A retrospective study assessing the effect of epidural analgesia in labor on the incidence of cesarean section was performed. The first 500 consecutive nulliparas meeting the following criteria were included in this study: term (37 weeks or longer) and singleton gestation, cephalic presentation, spontaneous onset of labor, and 5 cm or less of cervical dilation on admission. Patients were grouped according to their rate of cervical dilation in early labor (greater than or equal to 1 cm/hr, and less than 1 cm/hr) and the timing of epidural placement (none, early, or late). There was no effect of epidural analgesia on the incidence of cesarean section for fetal distress. The incidence of cesarean section for dystocia was significantly greater (p greater than 0.000001) in the epidural group (15.6%) than in the nonepidural group (2.4%). The greatest effect of epidural analgesia on the incidence of cesarean section for dystocia was observed in nulliparas who dilated at slower rates (less than 1 cm/hr) in early labor and who had epidural analgesia placed at 5 cm or less of cervical dilation (20.6% versus 3.4%, relative risk of 6, p less than 0.0005). The increase of cesarean section for dystocia associated with epidural analgesia could not be accounted for when other possibly confounding variables were studied. Both the dilation rate prior to epidural placement and the cervical dilation at epidural placement were significantly correlated to frequency of cesarean section for dystocia (p less than 0.01). This study suggests that epidural analgesia in labor may increase the incidence of cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparas.     

Epidural analgesia during labor and delivery: effects on the initiation and continuation of effective breastfeeding.

This prospective cohort study examined the association between epidural analgesia during labor and delivery, infant neurobehavioral status, and the initiation and continuation of effective breastfeeding. Healthy, term infants delivered vaginally by mothers who received epidural analgesia (n = 52) or no analgesia (n = 63) during labor and delivery were assessed at 8 to 12 hours postpartum, followed by a telephone interview with the mothers at 4 weeks postpartum. There was no significant difference between the epidural analgesia and no-analgesia groups in breastfeeding effectiveness or infant neurobehavioral status at 8 to 12 hours or in the proportion of mothers continuing to breastfeed at 4 weeks. Therefore, epidural analgesia did not appear to inhibit effective breastfeeding. There was a positive correlation between infant neurobehavioral status and breastfeeding effectiveness (Spearman rho = 0.48, P = .01), suggesting that neurobehavioral assessment may prove beneficial in identifying infants at greater risk for breastfeeding difficulties.