Does primary tracheoesophageal puncture reduce complications after laryngectomy and improve patient communication?

The charts of 96 patients who had a laryngectomy at the University of Minnesota and affiliated hospitals were reviewed to assess the benefit of primary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP). Patients were stratified into those with primary TEP and those without. There was no statistical difference in rates of esophageal stenosis, stomal stenosis, or wound breakdown without fistula. No fistulas developed in 33 patients who received primary TEP. 52% Of those with primary TEP, used their prosthesis for speech long-term. Only 5 of 63 patients whose surgery did not include primary TEP, received a secondary TEP, and only 2 retained the prosthesis for speech. There was no increased morbidity or incidence of complications after laryngectomy when performing a primary TEP. Patients will maintain the initial form of speech rehabilitation, even if it is less comprehensible. The early postoperative period is convenienced by using the puncture site as the entrance for nutrition during wound healing.     

Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with voice prostheses. Results of a prospective follow-up study]

Although the results of surgical rehabilitation by means of voice prostheses are on the average better than rehabilitation via oesophageal speech, the tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP)-technique has so far not been widely used in Germany. The majority of hospitals still prefer the "traditional" method of voice rehabilitation using oesophageal speech. The present prospective study was undertaken to compare the results of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation, if patients were offered the surgical voice rehabilitation via voice prosthesis as an alternative to oesophageal speech. Taking into account all the patients who underwent laryngectomy from 1989 until 1990 in Tübingen, primary surgical voice rehabilitation was performed in 44 out of 54 patients (81.5%). Interestingly enough, 34 patients who underwent laryngectomy were able to perform communication via the telephone on the day of their discharge. Moreover, one-third of the laryngectomised patients showed a significant increase in speech intelligibility within the first six months after laryngectomy. 36 patients with laryngectomy were able to attain proficiency 6 months after surgery. In 12 patients the prosthesis had to be removed, since either phonation was impossible or patients successfully learned and preferred oesophageal speech. In conclusion, independent of the method of voice rehabilitation (prosthesis, electrolarynx, oesophageal speech), our results support the hypothesis that a voice rehabilitation regimen will yield a higher rehabilitation rate of patients if rehabilitation via surgical voice is offered as an alternative to learning the oesophageal voice. Therefore, it seems to be advisable that patients are allowed to have the choice between surgical rehabilitation and oesophageal speech restoration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Surgical voice restoration following ablative surgery for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma

Surgical voice restoration is an important part of functional rehabilitation of patients following ablative surgery for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the functional status with regard to speech of a cohort of 100 patients (age ranged 34-84 years), who underwent laryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy over a 10-year period (1989-1999). Ninety-two patients consented to surgical voice restoration. Primary tracheoesophageal punctures were performed in 70 and secondary punctures in 22 (mainly after jejunal flap reconstruction). Nine patients were excluded from this analysis (seven patients died prior to assessment, one had the prosthesis removed at her request and one patient had insufficient follow-up). Tracheoesophageal speech was assessed in the remaining 83 patients using a rating scale measuring the number of syllables per breath, use of voice and intelligibility by non-professional listeners. Currently, Provox 2 valves are being used in the majority of patients. Overall tracheoesophageal speech results were good in 45/83 (54.2 per cent), average in 22/83 (26.5 per cent) and poor in 15/83 (18 per cent). One patient could not develop tracheoesophageal speech. The majority of laryngectomy patients had good speech but in patients who had complex reconstructions tracheoesophageal speech was mostly rated as average. Average to good speech in more than two-thirds of the cohort of patients show that surgical voice restoration is a highly successful and valuable technique to restore speech functions after ablative surgery for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.     

The acceptability of secondary tracheo-oesophageal fistula creation in long standing laryngectomees.

The use of a tracheo-oesophageal voice prosthesis was introduced to the Glasgow Royal Infirmary Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery unit in 1986. Although it was the authors' impression that most total laryngectomees since then had been offered this method of voice restoration, it was thought that long standing laryngectomees were seldom offered tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF) speech. Therefore all 58 total laryngectomees currently attending the combined head and neck surgery/radiotherapy clinic were assessed. Thirty-two had a tracheo-oesophageal fistula with voice prosthesis. All of these patients had undergone their total laryngectomy since 1986 and 83 per cent had achieved TOF speech. The remaining 26 patients (who mostly had their laryngectomy before 1986) had not been offered TOF speech. An outpatient consultation was arranged for these patients and 63 per cent of those offered, accepted TOF creation and a voice prosthesis. When compared to those who refused, it was found that good oesophageal speech, age or interval since laryngectomy were not good predictors of likely refusal. This study indicates that all fit long standing laryngectomees should be offered secondary TOF creation.     

Health-related quality of life in patients with laryngeal cancer: a post-treatment comparison of different modes of communication

INTRODUCTION: The effects of different treatment modalities and voice and speech rehabilitation methods on the quality of life in patients with laryngeal cancer are not fully understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional post-treatment questionnaire survey of 125 patients with laryngeal cancer was performed. The response rate was 74%. Three patient groups were identified: patients treated with radiotherapy and communicating with preserved larynx (n = 70), laryngectomized patients using a tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP) for speech (n = 14), and laryngectomized patients communicating with an electrolarynx (n = 5). Two established generic questionnaires, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, were used. RESULTS: The radiotherapy and the TEP groups displayed similar SIP and HAD profiles. No significant differences were seen in favor of the radiotherapy group, whereas the TEP group reported fewer problems in the SIP sleep/rest subscale. In 10 of 12 SIP categories, the numerically highest proportion of patients with clinically important dysfunction (SIP scores >10) was found in the small electrolarynx group. CONCLUSION: Successful speech rehabilitation with a TEP after laryngectomy may be as effective as conservative treatment with radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer with regard to psychosocial adjustment and functional ability, as measured with generic quality of life instruments.     

Managing problems with tracheoesophageal puncture for alaryngeal voice rehabilitation

OBJECTIVES: The tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) technique and the insertion of its associated voice prostheses may give rise to adverse events. We present our experience with this technique, paying special attention to the incidence and management of these adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective clinical analysis was undertaken. METHODS: Seventy-five laryngectomized patients underwent TEP for voice restoration. They were divided into two groups: group one, 43 patients with secondary TEP; and group two, 32 patients with primary TEP. Patient medical records were reviewed for data on the incidence, management and outcome of adverse events encountered during patients' follow up. RESULTS: Problems that arose in the patients were itemized as either early or late. The same patient could develop one or more problems in either group. The management of these problems, concerning the creation and maintenance of the TEP and associated prostheses, was noted. In group one, results were initially favourable in 91 per cent of patients and still positive in 81.4 per cent after three years. In group two, early results were favourable in all patients, and only two patients asked for late elective closure of the TEP (with a success rate of 93.7 per cent). CONCLUSIONS: Via an intensive and multidisciplinary approach to problems, most of the inevitable adverse events could be solved adequately, minimizing the discomfort of patients who had undergone laryngectomy and indwelling voice prosthesis insertion.     

A simple closure technique for reversal of tracheoesophageal puncture

Speech restoration after total laryngectomy has been revolutionized by the technique of tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) and speech valve prosthesis placement. Unfortunately, complications may arise from this procedure, sometimes necessitating reversal and surgical closure of the TEP. We present a simple yet effective method of closing a TEP and review previously described techniques.     

Blom-Singer发音管在喉全切除术后的临床应用

目的观察喉全切除术后应用Blom-Singer发音管重建喉发声功能的效果。方法回顾性分析1994年9月～2003年8月15例喉全切除术后行Blom-Singer发音管重建喉发声功能患者的临床资料。结果15例患者中12例行Ⅰ期发音管重建术，10例手术成功(10／12，83．33％)；3例行Ⅱ期发音管重建术，其中2例手术成功，两种术式的总成功率为80％(12／15)。Ⅰ期手术失败2例，与气管食管壁分离过多有关；Ⅱ期手术失败1例，系环咽肌切断不完全所致。结论喉全切除术后应用Blom-Singer发音管重建喉发声功能是一种有效的发声重建方法，环咽肌切断及保留气管食管壁的完整是手术成功的美键。     

A NSQIP study comparing surgical outcomes between primary and non-primary TEPs after total laryngectomy

ObjectiveTracheoesophageal puncture with voice prosthesis (TEP) is considered the gold standard for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy; however, there is debate as to whether it should be inserted concurrently with removal of the larynx (primary TEP), or as a separate, additional procedure at a later date (secondary TEP). We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (NSQIP) to compare postoperative complications, readmission rates, and reoperation rates among individuals who underwent total laryngectomy with or without concurrent TEP placement.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS-NSQIP) from 2012 to 2019. Patients were categorized into primary and non-primary TEP groups using a variation of CPT codes for total laryngectomy, tracheoesophageal prosthesis, and type of reconstruction. Univariate analyses were performed and significance was determined at p < 0.05.ResultsA total of 1974 patients who underwent total laryngectomy were identified from the database: 1505 (77.3 %) in the non-primary TEP group and 442 (22.7 %) in the primary TEP group. Patients in the non-primary TEP group were more likely to have an ASA class greater than or equal to three (91.2 % primary vs. 84.6 % non-primary, p < 0.001). Patients in the non-primary TEP group were also more likely to require intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions within the first 72 h of surgery (20.5 % non-primary vs. 15.3 % primary, p = 0.016). Both groups had similar rates of wound breakdown and dehiscence. There remained no significant difference based on type of reconstruction.ConclusionsThis study suggests that patients receiving primary TEPs are not at a greater risk of developing wound complications such as pharyngocutaneous fistulas in the 30-day postoperative period. This remained true when patients were stratified by type of flap reconstruction. Patients in the non-primary TEP group were more likely to have an ASA category of 3 or greater, which may explain why they experienced higher rates of complications such as blood transfusions intra-operatively or post-operatively.     

Videostroboscopy of the pharyngoesophageal segment in total laryngectomees

Objectives: The reconstructed pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) serves as the neoglottis following total laryngectomy, as it provides the source of vibration for production of tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) voice. To date, little information exists regarding the vibratory characteristics of the PES. The purpose of this investigation was to study the anatomy and physiology of the PES using videostroboscopy. Study Design: Prospective study investigating the anatomy and physiology of the PES in 34 laryngectomees who used TEP speech as their primary form of communication. Materials and Methods: Videostroboscopy and voice recordings were graded by three trained, blinded judges using a seven-point scale. Results: The patients demonstrated differences that allowed for separation of patients into two main groups: “poor” and “effective” TEP speakers. The voice quality differences were explained by anatomic and physiologic characteristics of the PES. Redundant, thick, and dyssynchronous PES features were observed in patients with poor TEP speech skills; the effective speakers exhibited less redundant, thinner mucosa and more synchronous vibratory patterns. Moreover, the latter subgroup consistently demonstrated a greater degree of volitional PES control and less spasmodic activity than their poorly speaking counterparts. Length of the PES opening (measured in the horizontal plane) as well as amount and consistency of secretions did not appear to influence TEP speech or voice proficiency. Conclusion: Videostroboscopy in laryngectomees is a noninvasive, inexpensive, easily performed procedure that may contribute valuable information regarding the anatomy and physiology of the PES, especially in patients who experience difficulties achieving satisfactory TEP voice and speech production.     

Pharyngeal myotomy for vocal rehabilitation postlaryngectomy

In those patients requiring total laryngectomy, esophageal speech appears to be the most desirable form of rehabilitation. Satisfactory esophageal speech is only obtained in 40 to 65% of the patients. Tracheoesophageal shunts as per Singer and Panje have provided solutions for a significant number of non-speakers, but still present problems as well as failures. Efforts to correct these failures have led to the concept of constrictor and cricopharyngeal discoordination. Pharyngeal block has demonstrated not only temporary correction of tracheoesophageal shunt failure but improvement and production of esophageal speech in non-shunted patients. Subsequently myotomy has provided permanent esophageal speech. This paper proposes consideration of this procedure in esophageal speech failures, when the Taub test and/or pharyngeal block demonstrates the presence of constrictor-cricopharyngeus discoordination. Representative cases are presented.     

Amatsu法发音重建术60例评价

目的 评价Amatsu法发音蕈建术的临床效果.方法 60例喉全切除、双颈淋巴清扫术患者一期行Amatsu法发音重建术,其中喉癌49例,下咽癌11例;1例术前放疗80 Gy,20例术后放疗60～70 Gy.术后随访3～6年,评价言语、吞咽功能.结果 52例(86.7%)术后均获得良好的言语功能,其中吞咽功能正常51例,另1例进食流食时可见气管内少量滴漏.8例(11.3%)发音重建失败,吞咽功能均正常:4例因并发咽瘘(其中术前放疗1例),经换药、抗感染处理后咽瘘均痊愈,吞咽功能正常,但已敛发音管坏死,发音失败;2例因气管食管造口粘连致发音管闭锁,未再行补救性手术,改用人工喉发音;1例不明原因呼吸困难;1例无发音意愿.20例术后放疗者言语功能有暂时性影响,均恢复良好.结论 Amatsu法发音重建术可一期重建喉全切除患者的言语和吞咽功能,可获得良好的发音效果,术后放疗不影响患者的远期发音效果.     

Rehabilitación del paciente laringectomizado. Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello

Total laryngectomy remains essential treatment for locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma, related to better survival rates. However, it involves changes for the patient, such as the inability to communicate verbally, breathing or aesthetic changes, which affect their quality of life and require comprehensive rehabilitation.This paper was written by the total laryngectomy rehabilitation workgroup of the National Head and Neck and Skull Base working committee of the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. The purpose of the article is to combine materials, surgical procedures and means towards the comprehensive rehabilitation of total laryngectomy patients, so that they can achieve a good quality of life. This paper is aimed at all health care professionals caring for total laryngectomy patients. It is also aimed at the patients themselves, as well as ENT surgeons.We have considered staffing and material needs, all procedures before, during and after surgery and after hospital discharge. There are also detailed recommendations about types of rehabilitation and follow-up, and the need for recording these events.The comprehensive rehabilitation total laryngectomy patients is very important if we want to improve their quality of life. The recommendations we mention aim to help the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of total laryngectomy patients to help them achieve a good quality of life, as similar as possible to the life they led before surgery.     

Estimation of smell sense rehabilitation in patients after total laryngectomy

The loss of sense of smell significantly decreases a quality of life after total laryngectomy. That is why this problem should be considered within a complex rehabilitation of laryngectomized patients. The smell exercises ought to start parallely to the speech rehabilitation. The aim of our study was to estimate the efficacy of smell rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. 59 persons after total laryngectomy attending the fourteen days long rehabilitation camp were examined. All the patients had the examination of three smells identification (lemon, mint and anise) made before the beginning of exercises. All the persons had also the efficacy of air aspiration through the nose measured. The control examination of those parameters was conducted after fourteen days of exercises of making the negative pressure in the throat and nasopharynx directing the air flow into the olfactory area of the nose. We confirmed a statistically significant differences between the smell identification and the force of aspiration before and after rehabilitation. We confirmed that patient's age and the time from laryngectomy have the influence into the efficacy of smell rehabilitation.     

Predictive value of objective esophageal insufflation testing for acquisition of tracheoesophageal speech.

This prospective study was undertaken to assess the predictive value of esophageal insufflation on the acquisition of tracheoesophageal (TE) speech. Fourteen total laryngectomy patients were evaluated prior to tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) using objective esophageal pressure measurements. These patients then were followed prospectively for 6 to 13 months. Speech was assessed at the time of prosthesis fitting, at 1 month, at less than 6 months, and at greater than 6 months post-TEP. No patient underwent pharyngeal myotomy. Pre-TEP esophageal insufflation pressure was associated (P = .065) with successful TE speech at the time of prosthesis fitting, but was not associated with successful TE speech acquisition after 6 months. This study's results suggest that patients with poor pre-TEP esophageal insufflation test results will usually obtain successful TE speech given adequate time and training, even without pharyngeal myotomy.     

The influence of early speech rehabilitation with voice prostheses on the psychological state of laryngectomized patients

This survey assessed how early speech rehabilitation influences the emotional state and psychological adjustment of 43 male laryngectomy patients, at three different chronological stages. The first assessment occurred 2–3 days before the operation. The patients filled out a stress questionnaire (SVF) which assessed coping strategies. Exactly 2 weeks after the operation the patients were given a list of adjectives (EWL) which measured their actual emotional state. One day before leaving the hospital the patients were given the Post-laryngectomy Telephone Test (PLTT) which ascertained the quality of speech intelligibility. In addition, patients filled out a questionnaire on postoperative stress and anticipated stigmatisation with regard to their changed voice. Results demonstrated that patients who had early speech rehabilitation felt significantly more active and, in general, felt considerably better than patients who had not received speech rehabilitation training. Patients assessed voice loss as extremely distressing. The postoperative stress and the anticipated stigmatisation on the basis of the changed voice was significantly higher in those patients with good speech intelligibility than in patients with poor speech articulation at hospital discharge. The coping strategies “Giving up and resignation” and “Need for social support” correlated positively with postoperative stress and anticipated stigmatisation. Results show that early speech rehabilitation with voice prostheses had a positive effect on the emotional state of laryngectomy patients. However, the early speech rehabilitation leads to distress in the initial phase in laryngectomy patients. Moreover, patients who habitually tend towards resignation, or need lots of social support should receive psychological support during the early phase of speech rehabilitation training. Received: 27 April 2001 / Accepted: 5 July 2001     

Olfactory rehabilitation and olfactory bulb volume changes in patients after total laryngectomy: a prospective randomized study

IntroductionAfter total laryngectomy, decreased olfactory function and olfactory bulb volume shrinkage have been reported to occur due to olfactory deprivation caused by nasal airflow interruption. There is evidence that the olfactory system can be modulated by repeated exposure to odors in a procedure called olfactory training. However, it is not known whether any recovery of the lost olfactory bulb volume is possible by eliminating olfactory deprivation via olfactory rehabilitation long after laryngectomy.ObjectiveThis study examined the recovery of olfactory function and the change in olfactory bulb volume via long-term olfactory rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.MethodsPossible causes of olfactory dysfunction in the study participants were evaluated by collecting detailed anamnesis. As olfactory tests, orthonasal butanol threshold and odor discrimination tests were performed. Three-dimensional olfactory bulb volumes were calculated using manual segmentation on T2-weighted coronal magnetic resonance images. In olfactory rehabilitation, four different odors were applied to all patients orthonasally, using a larynx bypass technique for 30 min per day for 6 months. Olfactory tests were performed before the rehabilitation and after 6 months of rehabilitation, and olfactory bulb volume measurements were performed using magnetic resonance images.ResultsEleven patients diagnosed with advanced laryngeal cancer who underwent total laryngectomy and postoperative radiotherapy with a follow-up of 5–10 years were included in the study. All patients were male, and the mean age was 58.18 ± 4.17 years. In total laryngectomized patients, the olfactory bulb volumes measured on magnetic resonance images were 42.25 ± 12.8 mm³ before and 55.5 ± 11.22 mm³ after rehabilitation, and this increase was highly significant. Olfactory test scores were 2.3 ± 1.27 before and 4.39 ± 0.86 after rehabilitation, and this increase was also highly significant.ConclusionAs a result of the olfactory rehabilitation applied by providing orthonasal air flow, the olfactory function lost after total laryngectomy was improved considerably, and the olfactory bulb volume was significantly increased. The increase in olfactory bulb volume in total laryngectomy patients via olfactory rehabilitation to eliminate olfactory deprivation due to nasal airflow interruption was demonstrated for the first time in this prospective longitudinal study.     

改良Amatsu法全喉切除术后的发音重建

目的：对全喉切除术后Ⅰ期气管食管造瘘术式发音重建进行临床评价。方法：用改良Ａｍｓｔｓｕ法对２０例患者实施全喉切除术后Ⅰ期发音重建术。结果：２０例全喉切除术后发音重建术患者随访１￣８年,最终有１６例获得发音功能。结论：全喉切除术后一期完成气管－食管造瘘发音重建术,适用于所有的全喉切除术或同期作根治性颈廓清术及术后放疗的患者,能较好地解决全喉切除术后发音问题。     

Rehabilitation after major head and neck surgery—the patients' view

Forty-nine patients who were free of tumour 5 months to 14 years (mean 30 months) after total laryngectomy or a commando precedure were given questionnaires designed to obtain the patient's assessment of their resulting disability. Sixteen areas of disability were studied grouped under five main headings: speech, eating, cosmetic, employment and social. Following laryngectomy more than half of the patients achieved successful communication by oesophageal speech. Success in this was usually associated with minimal problems in other areas. The disabilities after commando procedures were more varied and complex. more patients reported severe disability in more than one area. Difficulties with chewing and swallowing were prominent. The results aere illustrated with patients comments. Ways in which rehabilitation might be improved are considered.     

Results of vocal rehabilitation using tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy and their predictive factors

The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate prosthetic voice restoration by tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) in laryngectomized patients and to identify clinical factors correlated with functional outcomes. Between 2000 and 2008, 103 patients who underwent total laryngectomy or pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) were included in our study. Functional outcomes were recorded 6 months postoperatively, and results were scored from 0 to 2 for oral diet and speech intelligibility. Lifetime of voice prosthesis and early and late complications were recorded. The impact of several clinical factors on functional outcomes, prosthetic valve lifetime and complications was assessed in univariate analysis. A total of 87 patients (84%) underwent TEP and speech valve placement (79 primary and 8 secondary punctures). Hypopharyngeal tumors (P = 0.005), circular TPL (P = 0.003) and use of a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (P = 0.0003) were significantly associated with secondary TEP. Successful voice rehabilitation was obtained by 77 of 82 evaluable patients (82%). A high level of comorbidity (ASA score ≥ 3; P = 0.003) was correlated to speech rehabilitation failure. The median device lifetimes were 7.6 and 3.7 months for Provox I and II speech valves, respectively. Minor leakage around the valve occurred in 26% of the patients. Late complications occurred in 14 patients (16%) including: severe enlargement of the fistula (n = 3), prosthesis displacement (n = 7) and granulation tissue-formation (n = 4). In conclusion the use of voice prosthesis showed a high success rate of vocal rehabilitation with an acceptable complication rate.