Role of body position,gender, and age on pelvic floor location and mobility

The location and mobility of pelvic floor in different body positions and their relation to age and gender was assessed in 117 patients (19 men, 98 women, age range 10–77 years) with chronic nonorganic constipation (defined as less than three bowel movements per week for at least three years) by means of defecography. Eleven females (age range 16–69 years), without gastrointestinal symptoms, affected by noninvasive carcinoma of the cervix represented a control group. Pelvic floor location was measured as the distance in centimeters of the anorectal junction from the pubococcygeal line; pelvic floor mobility was measured during squeezing, straining, and defecation assuming the pelvic location at rest as zero reference. Pelvic floor location and mobility did not differ between controls and constipated patients. In both groups pelvic floor location at rest was significantly higher (P=0.001) with patients lying down than sitting up, whereas pelvic floor mobility during squeezing was greater with the patients sitting up than lying down (P=0.003). In both positions, pelvic floor location at rest was significantly lower (P=0.01) in females than in males. Pelvic floor mobility during squeezing was significantly different between gender. Parity and hysterectomy did not appear to affect pelvic floor location. Data emerging from this study indicate that body position is one of the major determinants of the pelvic floor location.Part of this work was presented at the annual meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association in Washington DC, May 13–19, 1989, and has been published in abstract from (Gastroenterology 96:192, 1989).     

Are pelvic floor movements abnormal in disordered defecation?

Pelvic floor movements were assessed by videoproctography in 126 subjects: neuropathic fecal incontinence patients (n=44), chronic constipation patients (n =52), and controls (n=30). A significantly lower pelvic floor position at rest and a more obtuse anorectal angle were found in incontinent patients than in controls (P <0.01). constipated patients showed no significant difference from controls at rest. There was less pelvic floor movement during contraction in incontinent patients than in controls, indicating a flaccid, noncontractile pelvic floor in neuropathic incontinence. Movement during contraction in constipated subjects was also less than in controls. Changes in the pelvic floor position during straining were the same as in controls. These data indicate that the pelvic floor is flaccid and noncontractile in neuropathic fecal incontinence, which supports the concept of a progressive neuropathy involving the sacral outflow. Similar changes are not seen at rest in patients with constipation even though they have a long history of straining.     

Anorectal anatomy and physiology

Knowledge of anorectal anatomy is essential for understanding the normal function of the anorectum. Its physiology is more complex, however. The maintenance of continence depends on several factors, and today clinicians have a better understanding of the usual sequence of events that leads to defecation. The extensive number of investigative techniques that have evolved have permitted better understanding of the disorders of the anal sphincters, rectum, and pelvic floor.     

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the structural and functional results of postanal repair for neuropathic fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor can discriminate between patients who improve after postanal repair for neurogenic fecal incontinence and those who remain symptomatic. METHODS: Pelvic floor measurements obtained during dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in eight females whose anal incontinence had improved after postanal repair were compared with those from nine females who remained symptomatic. All subjects also underwent standard anorectal physiology testing. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups with respect to any measurement of anterior or middle pelvic floor compartments. Additionally, there was no difference in posterior pelvic floor configuration when symptomatic patients were compared with those who had improved. However, dynamic magnetic resonance measurements revealed patients who remained symptomatic had significantly greater posterior pelvic floor weakness. Anorectal physiology was unable to differentiate between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in static pelvic floor measurements when subjects remaining symptomatic after postanal repair are compared with those who have improved. In contrast, dynamic measurements may be able to predict failure in those who demonstrate excessive posterior pelvic floor mobility.     

Pelvic floor digest

This section's aim is to stimulate readers of Techniques in Coloproctology to increase their interest in problems of the front and middle pelvic floor regions. Articles can be submitted to the Journal on any of these topics. The section publishes a small sample of the Pelvic Floor Digest. The PFD reproduces online (www.pelvicfloordigest.org) titles and abstracts selected from about 200 journals, divided into 10 sections. Its goal is to develop in the single individual an interdisciplinary culture in this field.     

Pelvic floor digest

This section's aim is to stimulate readers of Techniques in Coloproctology to increase their interest in problems of the front and middle pelvic floor regions. Articles can be submitted to the Journal on any of these topics. The section publishes a small sample of the Pelvic Floor Digest. The PFD reproduces online (www.pelvicfloordigest.org) titles and abstracts selected from about 200 journals, divided into 10 sections. Its goal is to develop in the single individual an interdisciplinary culture in this field.     

Audit of Constipation in a Tertiary Referral Gastroenterology Practice

Objective : Our objective was to assess how often "outlet obstruction" was the cause of constipation in a tertiary referral population. Methods : We retrospectively audited the case records of 70 consecutive patients referred to a single gastroenterologist in a tertiary referral motility clinic. Patients were classified by physiological tests of colonic transit, as well as tests of anorectal and pelvic floor function. A subset of 28 patients also underwent a battery of tests to assess the autonomic nervous system supply. Results : Thirty-six patients had symptoms suggestive of a rectal outlet obstruction syndrome. Thirty seven percent of patients had pelvic floor dysfunction, 27% had slow transit constipation, and 8% had anismus. Fully 55% of those with pelvic floor dysfunction had slow transit in addition. The remaining patients (23%) had at least two of Manning's criteria suggestive of the irritable bowel syndrome. Only four patients had documented abnormalities of autonomic function. Conclusions : Pelvic floor dysfunction is the most common cause of severe constipation in a tertiary referral motility clinic; slow transit constipation and irritable bowel syndrome occur equally. An algorithmic approach to evaluating patients using clinical features, anorectal functions tests, and assessment of colonic transit facilitates selection of management strategies. Autonomic dysfunction occurs rarely.     

Correlation of endoanal sonography with cross-sectional anatomy of the anal sphincter

BACKGROUND: Anal endosonography has become an important imaging method in the diagnosis of anorectal disorders. However, little information exists as to whether anal endosonography reliably defines pelvic floor structures. The aim of this study was to correlate endoanal sonography with cross-sectional anatomy and histology. METHODS: Endosonographic tomograms were obtained from 9 human cadavers before fixation and cross-sectioning at identical levels. Muscular layers were defined by visual inspection, histology, immunohistology, and morphometry using three-dimensional sphincter reconstructions. RESULTS: Endosonography visualized only two muscular layers, whereas anatomic sections always revealed three. Comparisons revealed identical findings with regard to internal sphincter volumes and asymmetries. However, due to its failure to identify the longitudinal muscle, endosonography largely overestimated external sphincter volumes. In contrast to current beliefs, anatomic studies failed to detect striated muscle fibers within the longitudinal muscle and did not show an intersphincteric space. However, anatomic cross sections demonstrated "anterior bands" as newly described anchoring mechanisms for the anal sphincters. CONCLUSIONS: Anal endosonography supplies accurate information with regard to internal anal sphincter dimensions, but does not reliably outline deeper muscular layers. However, despite these drawbacks, comparisons of modern imaging techniques with cross-sectional anatomy may enhance our understanding of pelvic floor anatomy.     

Pelvic floor digest

This section’s aim is to stimulate readers of Techniques in Coloproctology to increase their interest in problems of the front and middle pelvic floor regions. Articles can be submitted to the Journal on any of these topics. The section publishes a small sample of the Pelvic Floor Digest. The PFD reproduces online (www.pelvicfloordigest.org) titles and abstracts selected from about 200 journals, divided into 10 sections. Its goal is to develop in the single individual an interdisciplinary culture in this field.     

Clinical value of symptom assessment in patients with constipation

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate symptoms and clinical findings in a prospective series of patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: A total of 155 consecutive patients with intractable constipation underwent detailed symptom registration, anorectal manometry, electromyography, colonic transit time measurement, and defecography. RESULTS: All investigations were completed by 134 patients (112 females) with a median age of 52 (range, 17–79) years. Whole-gut transit time was delayed in 55 patients (41 percent), pelvic floor dysfunction was diagnosed in 59 patients (44 percent), but in 35 percent of patients both transit time and pelvic floor function were found to be normal. Three symptoms were shown to have an independent value for the diagnosis of slow-transit constipation. Patients with slow transit more often reported two or fewer stools per week (84vs. 46 percent), laxative dependence (87vs. 44 percent), and a history of constipation since childhood (58vs. 22 percent) than did those with normal transit. Pelvic floor dysfunction was associated with a higher prevalence of backache (53vs. 33 percent) and a lower prevalence of normal stool frequency (19vs. 36 percent), heartburn (12vs. 27 percent), and a history of anorectal surgery (7vs. 21 percent) compared with those with normal pelvic floor function. All four symptoms retained an independent value in the logistic regression analysis for pelvic floor dysfunction. Two symptoms characterized the group with normal transit and normal pelvic floor function: normal stool frequency and alternating diarrhea and constipation. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms are good predictors of transit time but poorer predictors of pelvic floor function in patients with constipation.     

Anorectal incontinence: therapeutic strategy of a complex surgical problem

The anatomophysiological integrity of the pelvic floor and anorectum contributes to the important function of continence and defecation. A variety of causes can cause damage in the anatomy and/or the innervation of the pelvic floor muscles as well as in anorectal sensitivity or stool consistency leading to anorectal continence disorder and incontinence. The most common cause of anorectal incontinence is related to injury of the sphincter muscles after delivery, or anorectal surgery. Anorectal incontinence is a complex problem, often of multifactorial origin. The exact cause of its incidence is unknown. However, the incidence is approximately 2% in the general population and 25-60% in the elderly. Although the condition is considered a problem in the elderly, it is becoming apparent that people are frequently affected from a much younger age. Anorectal incontinence is a severe disability and a major social problem as it produces a feeling of insecurity and pushes the patient towards social isolation. Management of the incontinent patient may be conservative (medicinal, biofeedback training), surgical (sphincter repair, pelvic floor repair, neosphincter formation, artificial sphincter or stoma) or use sacral nerve stimulation. The successful treatment of anorectal incontinence depends on accurate diagnosis of its cause, which is achieved by a thorough patient assessment including patient history, physical examination and selective specialized investigations. A stoma is the final resort when all other therapeutic attempts have failed.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic and dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in defecatory disorders

OBJECTIVE: Endoanal ultrasound identifies anal sphincter anatomy, and evacuation proctography visualizes pelvic floor motion during simulated defecation. These complementary techniques can evaluate obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. Our aim was to develop a single, nonionizing, minimally invasive modality to image global pelvic floor anatomy and motion. METHODS: We studied six patients with fecal incontinence and seven patients with obstructed defecation. The anal sphincters were imaged with an endoanal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coil and endoanal ultrasound (five patients). MR fluoroscopy acquired images every 1.4-2 s, using a modified real-time, T2-weighted, single-shot, fast-spin echo sequence, recording motion as patients squeezed pelvic floor muscles and expelled ultrasound gel; no contrast was added to other pelvic organs. Six patients also had scintigraphic defecography. RESULTS: Endoanal ultrasound and MRI were comparable for imaging defects of the internal and external sphincters. Only MRI revealed puborectalis and/or external sphincter atrophy; four of these patients had fecal incontinence. MR fluoroscopy recorded pelvic floor contraction during squeeze and recorded relaxation during simulated defecation. Corresponding comparisons for angle change and perineal descent during defecation were not significant; only MRI, but not scintigraphy, identified excessive perineal descent in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic MRI is a promising single, comprehensive, nonradioactive modality to measure structural and functional pelvic floor disturbances in defecatory disorders. This method may provide insights into mechanisms of normal and disordered pelvic floor function in health and disease.     

Laparoscopy for pelvic floor disorders

Surgical treatment of pelvic floor disorders has significantly evolved during the last decade, with increasing understanding of anatomy, pathophysiology and the minimally-invasive ‘revolution’ of laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic pelvic floor repair requires a thorough knowledge of pelvic floor anatomy and its supportive components before repair of defective anatomy is possible. Several surgical procedures have been introduced and applied to treat rectal prolapse syndromes. Transabdominal procedures include a variety of rectopexies with the use of sutures or prosthesis and with or without resection of redundant sigmoid colon. Unfortunately there is lack of one generally accepted standard treatment technique. This article will focus on recent advances in the management of pelvic floor disorders affecting defecation, with a brief overview of contemporary concepts in pelvic floor anatomy and different laparoscopic treatment options.     

Perineal descent and levator ani hernia: a dynamic magnetic resonance imaging study

PURPOSE: Patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse often have multifocal pelvic floor defects that are not always evident of physical examination. In this study, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic patients with pelvic floor prolapse demonstrated unsuspected levator ani hernia. This study was designed to identify any specific symptoms and/or physical findings associated with these hernias.METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients with pelvic organ prolapse, fecal and/or urinary incontinence, or chronic constipation received standardized questionnaires, physical examination, and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Fishers exact test was used to compare symptoms and examination findings between patients with or without levator ani hernia.RESULTS: Twelve patients (15 percent) were found to have unilateral (n = 8) or bilateral (n = 4) levator ani hernias on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. No one specific symptom was directly associated with the presence of a levator ani hernia. Furthermore, levator ani hernias were not found more frequently in patients with previous pelvic floor surgery. Perineal descent on physical examination was associated with the finding of a levator ani hernia in nine patients (P = 0.02). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward a lower incidence of levator ani hernia in females using estrogen replacement therapy (P = 0.06).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and perineal descent on physical examination may have a levator ani hernia. Although the significance of levator ani hernia needs to be determined, the recurrence rate after the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse remains unacceptably high, and ongoing investigation of all associated abnormalities is warranted.Data were obtained from the Johns Hopkins Pelvic Floor Database. Poster presentation at The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, June 24 to 29, 2000.     

Resident education outcomes and perception of a seminar format to teach female pelvic anatomy and procedures to correct pelvic prolapse

Urologic residents need to learn basic and applied knowledge of female pelvic anatomy, a subject rarely taught beyond preclinical undergraduate medical education. This study tests the hypothesis that urologic resident knowledge of female pelvic anatomy and prolapse may be enhanced with a seminar. Twenty residents attended a one day seminar combining didactics and a cadaveric dissection related to female pelvic anatomy and female pelvic prolapse conditions. Resident knowledge was measured with a multiple choice test administered in a pretest-posttest experimental design. Resident attitudes toward the seminar were assessed by a 20 item survey using a strongly disagree to strongly agree scale. Pretest and posttest mean scores were 55% and 71% respectively, p=.0007 (Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficients were 0.7). Questionnaire responses indicated positive opinions regarding the educational value of the seminar. Urologic resident knowledge of female pelvic anatomy and pelvic prolapse conditions may be enhanced by conducting a one day teaching seminar.     

Relationship between results of radiological pelvic floor study and anorectal manometry in patients consulting for constipation

The aim of this study was to assess (a) the incidence of perineal descent and (b) the relationship between radiological abnormalities of the pelvic floor and rectoanal manometric disturbances in patients consulting for constipation. Lateral radiographs in both the left lateral and supine positions studied pelvic floor descent. Results obtained in the 25 patients (mean age 47 years) studied were compared with those of 12 controls (mean age 58 years). Pelvic floor descent, never seen in controls, was demonstrated in 14 patients who were older (53±3 years, mean ±SD) than the 11 with a normal radiological examination (38±3 years,p<0.05). Anal low pressures (3 cases) and a low amplitude of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) (5 cases) were shown only in patients with perineal descent and anal high pressures only in those with normal radiology. Our results suggest that (a) perineal descent is a common finding in over 50% of constipated patients and (b) anorectal motility is related to pelvic floor function.     

Urodynamic evaluation of the bladder and pelvic floor

Pelvic floor disorders including lower urinary tract dysfunction are common, and may be evaluated by urodynamic tests, such as cystometry, uroflowmetry, pressure flow studies, electromyography, and video-urodynamics. These urodynamic tests provide objective information regarding the normal and abnormal function of the urinary tract and pelvic floor, and provide a better understanding of the pathophysiologic processes that cause lower urinary tract symptoms. This article describes typical urodynamic studies and their roles in the evaluation of common pelvic floor disorders, including stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and pelvic organ prolapse.     

Recent Advances in Functional Anorectal Disorders

Defecatory disorders are a common cause of chronic constipation and should be managed by biofeedback-guided pelvic floor retraining. While anorectal tests are necessary to diagnose defecatory disorders, recent studies highlight the utility of a careful digital rectal examination. While obstetric anal injury can cause fecal incontinence (FI), diarrhea is a more important risk factor for FI among women in the community, who typically develop FI after age 40. Initial management of fecal incontinence should focus on bowel disturbances. Pelvic floor retraining with biofeedback therapy is beneficial for patients who do not respond to bowel management. Sacral nerve stimulation should be considered in patients who do not respond to conservative therapy.     

The effect of age on pelvic floor dynamics

Anorectal function is known to be influenced by age but there is only scanty information about the effect of ageing on pelvic floor dynamics. Pelvic floor movements were assessed by videoproctography in two groups of ten control females (mean age of 30.5 and 60.7 years, respectively). A significantly lower pelvic floor position was found at rest in the older group (p=0.02), but younger controls showed an increased pelvic floor descent during straining (p=0.01). These results suggest that the pelvic floor is affected by progressive denervation but descent during straining tends to decrease with advancing age.     

Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and cystocolpoproctography alter surgical management of pelvic floor disorders

PURPOSE: Pelvic organ prolapse results in a spectrum of progressively disabling disorders. Despite attempts to standardize the clinical examination, a variety of imaging techniques are used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic cystocolpoproctography in the surgical management of females with complex pelvic floor disorders. METHODS: Twenty-two patients were identified from The Johns Hopkins Pelvic Floor Disorders Center database who had symptoms of complex pelvic organ prolapse and underwent dynamic magnetic resonance, dynamic cystocolpoproctography, and subsequent multidisciplinary review and operative repair. RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 58 ± 13 years, and all patients were Caucasian. Constipation (95.5 percent), urinary incontinence (77.3 percent), complaints of incomplete fecal evacuation (59.1 percent), and bulging vaginal tissues (54.4 percent) were the most common complaints on presentation. All patients had multiple complaints with a median number of 4 symptoms (range, 2–8). Physical examination, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and dynamic cystocolpoproctography were concordant for rectocele, enterocele, cystocele, and perineal descent in only 41 percent of patients. Dynamic imaging lead to changes in the initial operative plan in 41 percent of patients. Dynamic magnetic resonance was the only modality that identified levator ani hernias. Dynamic cystocolpoproctography identified sigmoidoceles and internal rectal prolapse more often than physical examination or dynamic magnetic resonance. CONCLUSIONS: Levator ani hernias are often missed by physical examination and traditional fluoroscopic imaging. Dynamic magnetic resonance and cystocolpoproctography are complementary studies to the physical examination that may alter the surgical management of females with complex pelvic floor disorders.Presented at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, June 24 to 29, 2000.No reprints are available.