Clinical advantages of COMT inhibition with entacapone – a review

Two catechol- O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors, entacapone and tolcapone, were developed during the 1990's to be used as adjuncts to levodopa (LD) - dopa decarboxylase (DDC) inhibitors in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Entacapone is currently in wide clinical use, while tolcapone can be used in restricted indications only, due to its hepatotoxicity. COMT inhibitors prolong the elimination of LD, while DDC inhibitors mainly increase its absorption; both mechanisms leading to increased bioavailability of LD. The pharmacokinetic properties of LD, carbidopa and entacapone are quite similar, and entacapone is administered concomitantly with LD plus carbidopa. Entacapone prolongs the clinical effect of each LD dose by 30 to 40 minutes; this effect is seen already after the first entacapone dose. When LD is administered in several frequent daily doses, addition of entacapone reduces the daily fluctuations of plasma LD by 30 to 40%.Based on studies with home diaries, entacapone increases the daily ON-time by an average of one to two hours, and reduces the daily OFF-time correspondingly in patients with PD with motor fluctuations. The daily LD dose has been reduced by 10 to 30%. These positive effects are sustained in long term use over several years. There is still scant information of the benefit of entacapone in patients without motor fluctuations.Entacapone can cause both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic adverse events. Increased dyskinesias are most frequently recorded in patients with motor fluctuations. The dopaminergic adverse events can usually be diminished by reducing the LD dose. Non-dopaminergic adverse events are abdominal pain and diarrhea. Diarrhoea has led to discontinuation in 3 to 4% of the patients in clinical trials. Entacapone has not been connected to liver toxicity and there are no indications to follow laboratory safety during treatment. The benefit-risk ratio of entacapone is considered favorable.A triple LD/carbidopa/entacapone combination tablet has recently been developed. Three LD strengths (50, 100 and 150 mg) are available, each contains 200 mg of entacapone. The majority of the patients can be managed with these three LD strengths. Entacapone has today an established position in treatment of PD patients with motor fluctuations, either as a separate tablet or as the triple LD combination.     

Inhibition of the COMPT with entacapone in the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson disease

Motor fluctuations are a common problem in the long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Entacapone (Comtan) is a potent, peripherally acting, reversible and selective inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Used as an adjuvant to levodopa therapy, entacapone slows the elimination of levodopa by decreasing peripheral conversion to 3-O-methyldopa, increasing central extracellular levodopa and striatal dopamine concentrations. Coadministered with levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide, at doses of 200 mg 2 to 10 times daily in patients with end-of-dose fluctuations, entacapone may increase the duration of clinical response, both after the first single dose and after repeated dosing. At this dosage, it has a time to peak plasma concentration of 1.2 h and an elimination half life of 3.4 h. In two multicentric, long-term (24 weeks), parallel, randomized and placebo-controlled studies, entacapone increased the duration of 'on' time (by approximately 1 hour daily) and decreased the duration of 'off' time with a concomitant reduction in the mean daily levodopa dose. In these and other phase III studies, entacapone was generally well tolerated, with most adverse effects being dyskinesias and gastrointestinal disorders. Increased dyskinesia were generally controlled by reducing levodopa doses. Entacapone appears to be a useful adjunct in extending the benefit of each levodopa dose in PD patients with end-of-dose fluctuations.     

The effect of peripheral enzyme inhibitors on levodopa concentrations in blood and CSF

Levodopa combined with a dopa‐decarboxylase inhibitor, such as carbidopa, shifts the metabolism to the COMT pathway. Adding the peripheral acting COMT inhibitor entacapone provides improvement for patients with PD suffering from motor fluctuations. We studied the effects of the enzyme inhibitors entacapone and carbidopa on the levodopa concentrations in CSF and in blood. Five PD patients with wearing‐off underwent lumbar drainage and intravenous microdialysis. Samples were taken 12 h daily for 3 days. Day 1; intravenous levodopa was given, day 2; additional oral entacapone 200 mg tid, day 3; additional oral entacapone 200 mg tid and carbidopa 25 mg bid. Levodopa in CSF and in dialysates was analysed. The AUC for levodopa increased both in blood and CSF when additional entacapone was given alone and in combination with carbidopa. The C_max of levodopa in both CSF and blood increased significantly. Additional entacapone to levodopa therapy gives an increase of C_max in CSF and in blood. The increase is more evident when entacapone is combined with carbidopa. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Quality of life in early Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone

We aimed to investigate whether treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone when compared with levodopa/carbidopa improves quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with no or minimal, nondisabling motor fluctuations. This is a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study. One hundred eighty‐four patients on 3 to 4 equal doses of 100/25 to 200/50 mg levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide, 0 to 3 hours of nondisabling OFF time over a 48 hour period and no dyskinesia were randomized to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone or levodopa/carbidopa treatment for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was quality of life as assessed by the PDQ‐8. Secondary outcome measures were the UPDRS parts I–IV, and the Wearing Off Card. Treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone resulted in significantly greater improvements in PDQ‐8 scores compared to treatment with levodopa/carbidopa (mean difference 1.4 points, P = 0.021). Statistically significant improvements were seen predominantly in nonmotor domains (depression, personal relationships, communication, stigma, all P < 0.05; dressing P = 0.056). Patients who were randomly assigned to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone also showed significantly greater improvement in UPDRS part II scores (P = 0.032) with UPDRS part III scores showing borderline significance. Differences in UPDRS parts I and IV and Wearing Off Card scores were not significant. Treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone results in improved quality of life compared with levodopa/carbidopa in PD patients with mild or minimal, nondisabling motor fluctuations. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society     

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of entacapone in levodopa-treated patients with stable Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND: The catechol O-methyltransferase inhibitor entacapone acts by extending the elimination half-life of levodopa and is currently approved as an adjunct to levodopa for the treatment of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) with motor fluctuations. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the addition of entacapone administration provides benefit to levodopa-treated PD patients who have a stable response to levodopa and do not experience motor complications. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient multicenter study. PATIENTS: Female and male patients 30 years or older with idiopathic PD receiving stable doses of levodopa or carbidopa with or without other dopaminergic therapies and who did not experience motor fluctuations were eligible for the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parkinsonian function and quality of life. RESULTS: The addition of entacapone did not improve motor scores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in levodopa-treated PD patients who did not experience motor fluctuations. The mean +/- SE adjusted change between baseline and final treatment visit was -0.9 +/- 0.35 in the entacapone group and -0.8 +/- 0.35 in the placebo group (P = .83). Significant improvement with entacapone treatment was detected in several quality-of-life measures, including the Parkinson Disease Questionnaire 39, the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the Parkinson's Symptom Inventory, and investigator and subject Clinical Global Assessments. The drug was well tolerated by patients in this population. CONCLUSIONS: The catechol O-methyltransferase inhibitor entacapone, used as an adjunct to levodopa in PD patients who do not experience motor fluctuations, does not improve Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores but does improve a variety of quality-of-life measures.     

Efficacy and safety of entacapone in Parkinson's disease patients with suboptimal levodopa response: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study in Germany and Austria (Celomen study)

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor entacapone, used as an adjunct to levodopa, in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this parallel group, randomized, double-blind study, 301 PD patients, the majority with motor fluctuations, received entacapone (200 mg) or placebo with each daily dose of standard or controlled-release (CR) levodopa. The 24-week treatment period was followed by 2 weeks of entacapone withdrawal. Efficacy was determined by home diaries ('on' and 'off' times), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and changes in levodopa dosage, and safety by adverse-event inquiry, vital signs, electro cardiography (ECG) and laboratory tests. RESULTS: In the total population, the UPDRS activities of daily living and motor scores were significantly improved (P < 0.05) by entacapone vs placebo. In fluctuating patients, 'on' time increased (1.7 h) and 'off' time decreased (1.5 h) significantly more with entacapone than with placebo (0.5 and 0.6 h, respectively; P < 0.05), and the daily levodopa dose was reduced by 54 mg with entacapone and increased by 27 mg with placebo (P < 0.05). Entacapone benefit was lost on withdrawal. Entacapone efficacy was comparable between patients using CR and standard levodopa preparations. Increased dyskinesias (entacapone 34%, placebo 26%) and nausea (10 and 5%, respectively), mostly occurring shortly after treatment initiation, were generally managed by reducing the levodopa dose. Diarrhoea (entacapone 8%, placebo 4%) was seldom severe. There were no differences in vital signs, ECG or laboratory results. CONCLUSION: Entacapone is an effective and safe levodopa extender and enhancer, improving the symptomatic efficacy of levodopa in PD and adding to the patients' benefit.     

Real-world considerations regarding the use of the combination of levodopa,carbidopa, and entacapone (Stalevo®) in Parkinson's disease

An important aim in long-term levodopa therapy is to prolong the duration of symptomatic efficacy of each dose without increasing peak plasma concentrations above the threshold for the emergence of dyskinesias. One strategy is to enhance levodopa delivery to the brain by co-administering it with inhibitors of peripheral dopa-decarboxylase and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Levodopa, carbidopa and entacapone (LCE), available in a range of fixed-dose combinations as the branded formulation Stalevo^® (Orion Pharma), has been developed to address this requirement and has been in general use for 20 years, having first been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Experience with LCE has established that improved levodopa pharmacokinetics achieved with dual-enzyme inhibition are translated into improved clinical efficacy, including the possibility of reducing total levodopa dosage with no loss of therapeutic effect. The ease and tolerability of switching to LCE has been affirmed in the SIMCOM trial and by personal experience detailed in this review. Some 300,000 patient-years of safety data are available for LCE, including trial data for up to 5 years. Most adverse effects associated with LCE are attributable to the levodopa component rather than the enzyme inhibitors. The hepatotoxicity observed with the class comparator tolcapone has not been observed with entacapone, the COMT inhibitor in LCE, and there is no formal requirement to monitor liver function during LCE therapy. Other common side effects include diarrhoea, which is one of the more prominent non-dopaminergic adverse events, and urine discolouration, which is harmless but about which patients may require reassurance.     

Entacapone in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND: The development of fluctuations in motor response and involuntary movements commonly complicate the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors delay the breakdown of levodopa, which leads to an increase in levodopa bioavailability and more stable concentrations of plasma levodopa. The addition of a COMT inhibitor therefore combines the rapid onset of levodopa with prolonged efficacy, and theoretically provides a more continuous stimulation of dopamine receptors with reduced risk of motor complications. Randomised, controlled trials have shown that in patients with PD who have motor fluctuations, the addition of the COMT-inhibitor entacapone results in an improvement in motor fluctuations, particularly of the "wearing-off" type, with about 1.0-1.7 h more on-time and less off-time per day, reduced required levodopa dose, modest improvement in motor and disability scores (mean total unified PD rating scale [UPDRS] scores of about 4.5), and in some but not all studies improvement of health-related quality of life [HRQOL] scores. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: Patients with stable PD, without motor fluctuations, also have improved HRQOL scores on treatment with entacapone in addition to levodopa with a dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor. However, in a recent large multicentre study, UPDRS motor and disability scores were not improved despite significant improvements in HRQOL scores. The disparity between results on clinical rating scales and HRQOL scores suggests that these scales give different and potentially complementary information on health status changes in PD, and that entacapone provides benefit that may not be captured with standard clinical rating scales. Whether entacapone combined with levodopa can delay dyskinesia or motor fluctuations in patients with untreated PD is unknown; however, in animal studies, a decrease in motor complications has been reported in drug-naive animals given frequent doses of levodopa combined with entacapone. WHERE NEXT?: Clinical studies are underway to address the hypothesis that motor complications in PD can be delayed if entacapone is given from the start of treatment. Until the results of these trials are available, entacapone is indicated as a useful adjunct to levodopa in the symptomatic treatment of patients with PD with and without motor fluctuations. In addition, future trials should specifically assess the effect of entacapone on HRQOL in PD.     

Direct switch from levodopa/benserazide or levodopa/carbidopa to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone in Parkinson’s disease patients with wearing-off: efficacy, safety and feasibility—an open-label, 6-week study

The study objective was to assess the efficacy, safety and feasibility of switching from levodopa/benserazide (LB) or levodopa/carbidopa (LC) to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with wearing-off. This was a multicenter, open-label, 6-week study; the primary outcome was success rate based on the patient-assessed Clinical Global Impression of Change (P-CGI-C). Secondary outcomes included investigator-assessed CGI-C (I-CGI-C), change from baseline in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), motor/non-motor wearing-off symptoms and quality of life–visual analog scale (QoL-VAS). After switching to LCE, 77% of patients reported an ‘improvement’ (p < 0.0001 vs. patients reporting ‘no change or worsening’). Significant improvements were seen in I-CGI-C, UPDRS and QoL-VAS, regardless of prior therapy. Oral levodopa dosing was increased in 28% of patients; the primary outcome remained significant when these patients were excluded. The data suggest that switching from LB/LC to LCE provided a significant benefit in PD patients with wearing-off.     

Double‐blind trial of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone versus levodopa/carbidopa in early Parkinson's disease

We performed a 39‐week, randomized, double‐blind, multicenter study to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE, Stalevo) with levodopa/carbidopa (LC, Sinemet IR) in patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD). Four hundred twenty‐three patients with early PD warranting levodopa were randomly assigned to treatment with LCE 100/25/200 or LC 100/25 three‐times daily. The adjusted mean difference in total Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II and III between groups using the analysis of covariance model (prespecified primary outcome measure) was 1.7 (standard error = 0.84) points favoring LCE (P = 0.045). Significantly greater improvement with LCE compared with LC was also observed in UPDRS Part II activities of daily living (ADL) scores (P = 0.025), Schwab and England ADL scores (blinded rater, P = 0.003; subject, P = 0.006) and subject‐reported Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores (P = 0.047). There was no significant difference in UPDRS Part III or investigator‐rated CGI scores. Wearing‐off was observed in 29 (13.9%) subjects in the LCE group and 43 (20.0%) in the LC group (P = 0.099). Dyskinesia was observed in 11 (5.3%) subjects in the LCE group and 16 (7.4%) in the LC group (P = 0.367). Nausea and diarrhea were reported more frequently in the LCE group. LCE provided greater symptomatic benefit than LC and did not increase motor complications. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society     

Efficacy of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone versus levodopa/carbidopa in patients with early Parkinson’s disease experiencing mild wearing-off: a randomised,double-blind trial

To compare the efficacy and safety of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) with levodopa/carbidopa (LC) on Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with mild, or only minimally disabling motor complications. A prospective 3-month, multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind, and randomised phase IV study was performed. The primary endpoint was to assess the efficacy of LCE compared to LC on ADLs using the UPDRS part II. Secondary endpoints were assessed by the UPDRS (I, III and IV) scores, QUICK and PDQ-39 questionnaires, and patient and investigator clinical global impression (CGI). Ninety-five patients were randomly assigned to treatment with LCE (100/25/200 or 150/37.5/200 mg tablets, n = 46) or LC (100/25 mg tablets, n = 49), at the same levodopa dose that were administered before randomization. Treatment with LCE resulted in significantly greater improvement in UPDRS part II (ADLs) scores compared to treatment with LC (adjusted mean difference between groups of ?1.5 points) (p = 0.0288). Amelioration was also observed in UPDRS part III scores (p = 0.010), and CGI (patient and investigator) scores (p = 0.015, and p = 0.028, respectively). LCE and LC were generally well tolerated with 78 % of subjects completing the study. Most AEs (50 % in LCE and 71.4 % in LC) were classified as mild. No serious AEs were related to the treatment. Treatment with LCE results in improved efficacy compared to LC in PD patients with mild, or minimally disabling motor fluctuations, maintaining a good safety and tolerability profile.     

Should levodopa dose be reduced when switched to stalevo?

The addition of entacapone to levodopa-carbidopa (LC) or the switch from LC to a tablet containing levodopa–carbidopa–entacapone (LCE) improves the wearing-off phenomenon, increases the 'on' time and decreases the 'off' time, but the appearance or exacerbation of dyskinesias is the more frequent side-effect. Thus, a reduction of the total levodopa dosage would be recommended. However, this could result in a lack of efficacy against the wearing-off. We report on the results of a clinical trial conducted to determine the best way in terms of efficacy, tolerability and safety of switching from LC to LCE in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and end of dose wearing-off. 39 patients with PD and wearing-off without or with mild dyskinesias were randomly assigned to either a group receiving the same LC dosage or to a group in which the total LC amount was reduced by 15–25%. Four weeks after the change, both groups showed an increase in daily 'on' time and a reduction in the daily time spent in 'off'. Two patients in each group experienced an increase in basal dyskinesias. No differences in clinical assessment between groups were found. Tolerance was excellent. This study suggests that switching from LC to LCE in patients with mild-to-moderate wearing-off can be done safely with or without reducing the total LD amount, but in the clinical setting it would be more practical to keep the dosage of LC unchanged unless severe dyskinesias are present.     

A Double‐Blind,Randomized, Placebo and Active‐Controlled Study of Nebicapone for the Treatment of Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease

To determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nebicapone, a new catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitor for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD), we conducted a multicenter, randomized, 8‐week double‐blind, placebo‐ and active‐controlled, parallel‐group study comparing nebicapone 50 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg, entacapone 200 mg (active control) or placebo administered concomitantly with levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide. Two hundred and fifty‐two PD patients with motor fluctuations treated with levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide (4–8 daily doses) were enrolled and 250 patients were eligible for intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis on the basis of having at least one efficacy assessment. The primary endpoint was 8‐week change from baseline in absolute “Off” time duration noted in self‐scoring diaries. At 8 weeks of treatment the mean daily “Off” time decreased significantly compared to placebo for nebicapone 150 mg (?106 min; 95%CI: ?192; ?21) and entacapone 200 mg (?81 min; 95%CI: ?142; ?19). The decrease in “Off” time with nebicapone 50 mg or 100 mg did not reach statistical significance. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported by 32% to 49% of patients in any treatment group, with no observed dose relationship in the nebicapone groups. Clinically relevant elevations in aspartate transaminase (AST) and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) were observed in 4 of 46 patients with the nebicapone 150 mg dose. The results of this study show that nebicapone 150 mg is efficacious for the treatment of motor fluctuations in PD patients. However, the risk of increasing liver transaminases and its clinically relevance deserves further evaluation.     

Treatment of end-of-dose wearing-off in parkinson's disease: stalevo (levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone) and levodopa/DDCI given in combination with Comtess/Comtan (entacapone) provide equivalent improvements in symptom control superior to that of traditional levodopa/DDCI treatment

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new optimised levodopa, Stalevo (levodopa, carbidopa and entacapone) in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing end-of-dose wearing-off. Treatment with Stalevo was compared to treatment with traditional immediate-release levodopa and dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) formulations along with adjunct entacapone (Comtess/Comtan). A European, open, parallel-group, active treatment-controlled phase IIIb study evaluating 176 patients randomised to switch from their current regimen of levodopa/DDCI to either an equivalent dose of Stalevo or levodopa/DDCI plus entacapone. After 6 weeks, treatments were assessed using the Clinical Global Impression of Change, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and a Motor Fluctuations Questionnaire. Over 70% of patients in both the Stalevo and adjunct entacapone arms felt that they were clinically improved and over 80% experienced a reduction in fluctuations. Although there was no significant difference between Stalevo and levodopa/DDCI plus entacapone with regard to motor improvement and side effects, 81% of patients stated that they preferred treatment with Stalevo compared with taking two separate tablets (i.e. levodopa/DDCI and entacapone). Stalevo was well tolerated and safe when substituted for levodopa DDCI preparations.     

Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone is the preferred treatment for Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations in routine practice: a retrospective, observational analysis of a large French cohort

Levodopa is the gold standard drug for the symptomatic control of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, long-term treatment with conventional formulations [levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI)], is associated with re-emergence of symptoms because of wearing-off and dyskinesia. Treatment with levodopa/DDCI and entacapone extends the half-life of levodopa, avoiding deep troughs in levodopa plasma levels and providing more continuous delivery of levodopa to the brain. In this open-label, retrospective, observational study we investigated the effects of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone therapy in 800 PD patients with motor fluctuations. Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone treatment was assessed as good/very good in improving motor fluctuations (64%) and activities of daily living (ADL; 62%). The therapeutic utility was considered to be good/very good in 70% of cases. Moreover, there was a reduction in levodopa dose in 20% of patients. Neurologists preferred levodopa/DDCI and entacapone compared with increasing levodopa dosage, dose-fractionation or addition of a dopamine agonist (63%, 29% and 23% of patients respectively). Reasons included achieving more continuous dopaminergic stimulation (40%), reducing motor fluctuations (54%) and improving ADL (41%). This analysis reveals the preference of neurologists for levodopa/DDCI and entacapone over conventional levodopa-modification strategies for the effective treatment of PD motor fluctuations in clinical practice.     

Optimizing levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone: implications from a clinical and patient perspective

After 40 years of clinical experience, levodopa remains the gold standard treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) despite the recent emergence of a host of new therapies. Some physicians are cautious when prescribing levodopa because of its association with motor complications. Evidence now suggests that levodopa-associated complications are a result of deep troughs in delivery of levodopa to the brain caused by the short plasma half-life of conventional levodopa formulations (levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor [DDCI]). Dosing strategies, such as dose increases and dose fractionation, may be effective in the short term. For the longer-term, levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone provides pharmacokinetically optimized levodopa therapy that significantly increases the plasma half-life and bioavailability of levodopa, providing more consistent plasma levodopa levels without deep troughs. Evidence from clinical trials in PD patients experiencing re-emergence of symptoms due to wearing-off has consistently shown that levodopa/DDCI and entacapone significantly increases ON-time and affords greater functionality, as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) with conventional levodopa. These trials have also shown that levodopa/DDCI and entacapone is generally well tolerated, with notable adverse events including worsening dyskinesia, nausea and diarrhea. Patients experiencing re-emergence of symptoms due to wearing-off may benefit from optimized levodopa therapy with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone.     

Immediate-release and controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa in PD: a 5-year randomized multicenter study. Carbidopa/Levodopa Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare effects of immediate-release (IR) and sustained-release (CR) carbidopa/levodopa in levodopa-naive PD patients. BACKGROUND: It was hypothesized that the long-acting preparation would be associated with fewer long-term complications. METHODS: A total of 618 patients were studied in 36 centers worldwide in a blinded, randomized parallel study. Measures of efficacy and adverse reactions were recorded at 3-month intervals for 5 years. Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias were evaluated by a patient diary and a physician-recorded questionnaire. The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) was used to evaluate quality of life. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of patients completed the trial. After 5 years, the mean dose of IR was 426 mg/day, and the bioavailable dose of CR was 510 mg/day (mean dose, 736 mg/day). After 5 years, 20.6% of the IR group and 21.8% of the CR group had motor fluctuations or dyskinesia. Sixteen percent of both groups had changes in motor response by the questionnaire's definition. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Disability scores and the motor score of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were highest at baseline, improved with therapy, and thereafter worsened over time to reach baseline scoring at the end of 5 years. The CR group was superior to IR for the Activities of Daily Living subsection of the UPDRS for all 5 years and for emotional reactivity and social isolation on the NHP; however, this may have resulted from higher doses of CR that were used. CONCLUSION: Despite the progressive nature of PD, both the immediate-release and sustained-release carbidopa/levodopa formulations maintained a similar level of control in PD after 5 years compared with baseline. Additionally, the low incidence of motor fluctuations or dyskinesia was not significantly different between the treatment groups and may be partly attributed to the relatively low doses of levodopa used throughout the 5-year study.     

Inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase contributes to more stable levodopa plasma levels.

The short plasma half-life limits the antiparkinsonian efficacy of levodopa/carbidopa (LD/CD). Administration of LD/CD with the catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor entacapone in one tablet (LCE) may extend plasma half-life of LD and thus its effect on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The objectives of this study were to monitor the motor response to a switch from LD/CD to LCE by a simultaneous performance of an instrumental motor test and rating of motor symptoms and to compare the LD plasma behavior between both conditions in terms of stability. Twenty-one treated PD patients received LD/CD and then the identical oral LD dosage of LCE within a standardized setting on 2 consecutive days. Rating better reflected the motor improvement after LD application than the instrumental test. Motor symptoms of PD patients decreased significantly more during the LCE than the LD/CD condition, probably due to significantly higher LD plasma levels and a significantly less pronounced fall of the LD concentrations following the second LD intake. Our study shows a more stable LD plasma behavior during LCE intake and accordingly a better effect on motor symptoms according to rating outcomes and motor test results to a lesser extent.     

Levodopa infusion combined with entacapone or tolcapone in Parkinson disease: a pilot trial

Background and purpose: Catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitors may be used to decrease levodopa requirement. The objective was to investigate whether the levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion dose can be reduced by 20% without worsening of motor fluctuations and levodopa concentration stability when oral catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitors are added. Methods: A short‐term, randomized, partly blinded, crossover, investigator‐initiated clinical trial was performed, with levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel combined with oral entacapone and tolcapone on two different days in 10 patients. The primary outcome measure was difference in coefficient of variation of levodopa in plasma between levodopa/carbidopa, levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone, and levodopa/carbidopa/tolcapone. The secondary outcome measures other pharmacokinetic variables, patient‐reported outcome, and blinded analysis of motor performance. Results: Variation of plasma levodopa concentrations did not differ significantly between the treatments. The treatments did not differ regarding motor performance. Levodopa concentrations were significantly higher using tolcapone. Concentrations of the metabolite 3‐O‐methyldopa decreased gradually during catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibition. Conclusions: According to this small, short‐term pilot study, oral catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitors administered in 5‐h intervals may be useful in cases where levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel dose reduction is wanted. Stability of plasma levodopa levels is not significantly altered, and off‐time is not increased when decreasing the levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel dose by 20%. Rather, the dose should probably be decreased more than 20%, especially under tolcapone co‐treatment, to avoid increased dyskinesias with time.     

Fewer fluctuations,higher maximum concentration and better motor response of levodopa with catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition

Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor addition to levodopa/carbidopa formulations improves motor symptoms and reduces levodopa fluctuations in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Objectives were to investigate the effects of entacapone and tolcapone on plasma behaviour of levodopa, its metabolite 3-O-methyldopa and on motor impairment. 22 patients orally received levodopa/carbidopa first, then levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone and finally levodopa/carbidopa plus tolcapone within a 4.5 h interval twice. Maximum concentration, time to maximum level and bioavailability of levodopa did not differ between all conditions each with 200 mg levodopa application as a whole. Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition caused less fluctuations and higher baseline levels of levodopa after the first intake and less 3-O-methyldopa appearance. The maximum levodopa concentrations were higher after the second levodopa intake, particularly with catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition. The motor response to levodopa was better with catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition than without, tolcapone was superior to entacapone. More continuous levodopa brain delivery and lower 3-O-methyldopa bioavailability caused a better motor response during catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition.