The efficacy of HER2-targeted agents in metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis

BackgroundThe addition of HER2-targeted agents to standard treatment has been shown to improve outcomes for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients. We undertook a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in addition to standard treatment in metastatic breast cancer patients.Patients and methodsEligible trials were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the addition of HER2 therapy to standard treatment (hormone or chemotherapy) reporting overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and/or response rates.ResultsEight trials comprising 1848 patients were eligible for inclusion. HER2-targeted agents were trastuzumab and lapatinib and therapeutic partners were taxanes (4 RCTs), anthracyclines (1), capecitabine (2), anastrozole (1) and letrozole (1). The addition of HER2-targeted agents improved OS [hazard ratios (HR) 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.91], TTP (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.48–0.64), PFS (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.53–0.74) and overall response rate (relative risk 1.67; 95% CI 1.46–1.90).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis confirms the benefit of adding HER2-targeted therapy to standard treatment in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer. Compared with OS, TTP, PFS and ORR overestimate treatment benefit. Trials in our meta-analysis differed in terms of partner drug or HER2 agents, yet delivered comparable outcomes.     

Second-line single-agent versus doublet chemotherapy as salvage therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of a combination of chemotherapeutic agent compared with single-agent chemotherapy in the second-line setting of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) are unclear. We aimed to study the survival impact of single-agent compared with doublet chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy of advanced UC.Patients and methodsLiterature was searched for studies including single-agent or doublet chemotherapy in the second-line setting after platinum-based chemotherapy. Random-effects models were used to pool trial-level data according to treatment arm, including median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) probability, and grade 3–4 toxicity. Univariable and multivariable analyses, including sensitivity analyses, were carried out, adjusting for the percent of patients with ECOG performance status ≥1 and hepatic metastases.ResultsForty-six arms of trials including 1910 patients were selected: 22 arms with single agent (n = 1202) and 24 arms with doublets (n = 708). The pooled ORR with single agents was 14.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.1–17.9] versus 31.9% [95% CI 27.3–36.9] with doublet chemotherapy. Pooled median PFS was 2.69 and 4.05 months, respectively. The pooled median OS was 6.98 and 8.50 months, respectively. Multivariably, the odds ratio for ORR and the pooled median difference of PFS were statistically significant (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002) whereas the median difference in OS was not (P = 0.284). When including single-agent vinflunine or taxanes only, differences were significant only for ORR (P < 0.001) favoring doublet chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences in grade 3–4 toxicity were seen between the two groups.ConclusionsDespite significant improvements in ORR and PFS, doublet regimens did not extend OS compared with single agents for the second-line chemotherapy of UC. Prospective trials are necessary to elucidate the role of combination chemotherapy, with or without targeted agents, in the salvage setting. Currently, improvements in this field should be pursued considering single-agent chemotherapy as the foundation for new more active combinations.     

Randomized Phase 2 Studies of Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination With Pegilodecakin in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC (CYPRESS 1 and CYPRESS 2)

IntroductionCheckpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been approved to treat metastatic NSCLC. Pegilodecakin + CPI suggested promising efficacy in phase 1 IVY, providing rationale for randomized phase 2 trials CYPRESS 1 and CYPRESS 2.MethodsCYPRESS 1 (N = 101) and CYPRESS 2 (N = 52) included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 and first-line/second-line metastatic NSCLC, respectively, without known EGFR/ALK mutations. Patients were randomized 1:1; control arms received pembrolizumab (CYPRESS 1) or nivolumab (CYPRESS 2); experimental arms received pegilodecakin + CPI. Patients had programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of greater than or equal to 50% (CYPRESS 1) or 0% to 49% (CYPRESS 2). Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per investigator. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory end points included immune activation biomarkers.ResultsMedian follow-up for CYPRESS 1 and CYPRESS 2 was 10.0 and 11.6 months, respectively. Results for pegilodecakin + pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab were as follows: ORR per investigator 47% versus 44% (OR = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5–2.5); median PFS 6.3 versus 6.1 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.937, 95% CI: 0.54–1.625); and median OS 16.3 months versus not reached (HR = 1.507, 95% CI: 0.708–3.209). Results per blinded independent central review were consistent. Treatment discontinuation rate owing to adverse events (AEs) doubled in the experimental arm (32% versus 15%). AEs with grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related AEs (62% versus 19%) included anemia (20% versus 0%) and thrombocytopenia (12% versus 2%). Results for pegilodecakin + nivolumab versus nivolumab were as follows: ORR per investigator 15% versus 12% (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.3–5.9); median PFS 1.9 versus 1.9 months (HR = 1.006, 95% CI: 0.519–1.951); and median OS 6.7 versus 10.7 months (HR = 1.871, 95% CI: 0.772–4.532). AEs with grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related AEs (70.4% versus 16.7%) included anemia (40.7% versus 0%), fatigue (18% versus 0%), and thrombocytopenia (14.8% versus 0%). Biomarker data suggested activation of immunostimulatory signals of interleukin-10R pathway in pegilodecakin-containing arms.ConclusionsDespite evidence of biological effect in peripheral blood, adding pegilodecakin to CPI did not improve ORR, PFS, or OS, in first-line/second-line NSCLC. Pegilodecakin + CPI has been found to have overall higher toxicity compared with CPI alone, leading to doubling of treatment discontinuation rate owing to AEs.     

Efficacy and safety of vandetanib, a dual VEGFR and EGFR inhibitor, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Vandetanib, an oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, has attracted wide interest in treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess its efficacy and safety via a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods: Trials comparing vandetanib-based therapy and non-vandetanib therapy for advanced NSCLC were identified. Endpoints evaluated were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective tumor response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Results: Seven trials including 4,492 patients were included in the analysis. As compared with placebo, vandetanib yielded a clear benefit for ORR (odds ratio (OR) = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.60-2.61; P < 0.001), and a clinically and statistically significant 25% improvement in PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.66-0.85; P < 0.001). However, these benefits did not translate into a significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88-1.04; P = 0.291). Subgroup analyses showed that vandetanib 100mg/d was associated with greater antitumor activity than 300mg/d when given in combination with chemotherapy. In addition, the pooled results demonstrated no statistically significant difference between vandetanib and single-targeted agents in PFS, ORR or OS. Vandetanib was associated with more frequent adverse events. Conclusions: Vandetanib, as compared with placebo, significantly increases ORR and PFS, but does not improve OS in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. As compared with single-targeted agent, vandetanib does not provide any efficacy advantage. Furthermore grade 3 or greater toxicity proved greater in the vandetanib arm.     

EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment:a meta-analysis简

Objective：The epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） inhibitors monoclonal antibodies （MoAbs） have already shown the therapeutic effectiveness in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer （mCRC）.But many patients resist to the treatment.The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess EGFR gene copy number （GCN） as a candidate predictive biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR MoAbs in mCRC treatment.Methods：Systematic computerized searches of the PubMed,EMBase and Cochrane Library were performed.The primary endpoint was objective response rate （ORR）.The second endpoints included progression-free survival （PFS）,and overall survival （OS）.The pooled odd ratio （OR） and pooled sensitivity,specificity,and summary receiver operator characteristic （SROC） for ORR were estimated.The pooled hazard ratios （HR） for PFS and OS were also calculated.Results：Fourteen studies with 1,021 patients were included.Increased EGFR GCN was associated with increased ORR （OR=6.905; 95％ CI：4.489-10.620）.It was also found in wild-type KRAS mCRC patients,with the pooled OR of 8.133 （95 ％ CI：4.316-15.326）.GCN has medium value for predicting ORR,with the pooled sensitivity of 0.79 （95％ CI：0.73-0.84）,the pooled specificity of 0.59 （95％ CI：0.55-0.62）.In wildtype KRAS mCRC patients,the sensitivity and the specificity were 0.80 （95％ CI：0.70-0.87） and 0.60 （95％CI：0.53-0.66）,respectively.Increased EGFR GCN was associated with increased PFS （HR=0.557; 95％ CI：0.382-0.732） and OS （HR=0.579; 95％ CI：0.422-0.737）.Conclusions：This meta-analysis suggests that EGFR GCN represents a predictive biomarker for tumor response in mCRC patients treated with MoAbs regardless of KRAS mutation.mCRC patients with increased EGFR GCN are more likely to have a better response,PFS,and OS when treated with cetuximab or panitumumab.     

Association of the Time to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Initiation and Outcomes With Second Line ICI in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

BackgroundEarly progression on first-line (1L) platinum-based therapy or between therapy lines may be a surrogate of more aggressive disease and poor outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but its prognostic role regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response and survival is unclear. We hypothesized that shorter time until start of second-line (2L) ICI would be associated with worse outcomes in aUC.Patients and MethodsWe performed a retrospective multi-institution cohort study in patients with aUC treated with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy, who received 2L ICI. Patients receiving switch maintenance ICI were excluded. We defined time to 2L ICI therapy as the time between the start of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy to the start of 2L ICI and categorized patients a priori into 1 of 3 groups: less than 3 months versus 3-6 months versus more than 6 months. We calculated overall response rate (ORR) with 2L ICI, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the start of 2L ICI. ORR was compared among the 3 groups using multivariable logistic regression, and PFS, OS using cox regression. Multivariable models were adjusted for known prognostic factors.ResultsWe included 215, 215, and 219 patients in the ORR, PFS, and OS analyses, respectively, after exclusions. ORR difference did not reach statistical significance between patients with less than 3 months versus 3-6 months versus more than 6 months to 2L ICI. However, PFS (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.02-2.63) and OS (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.10-2.84) was shorter among those with time to 2L ICI less than 3 months compared to those who initiated 2L ICI more than 6 months.ConclusionAmong patients with aUC treated with 2L ICI, time to 2L ICI less than 3 months was associated with lower, but not significantly different ORR, but shorter PFS and OS compared to 2L ICI more than 6 months. This highlights potential cross resistance mechanisms between ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy.     

All-oral combination of lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer – A phase II study

PurposeApproximately one-third of patients with advanced, HER2+ve breast cancer (BC) develop brain metastases (BMs). The aim of this study is to investigate efficacy and tolerability of the combination of lapatinib and capecitabine (LC) in HER2+ve BC patients with brain metastases (BCBM).Patients and methodsBetween January 2011 and January 2013, 21 patients with HER2+ve BCBM were included. Sixteen patients (76.19%) progressed after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 5 patients (23.81%) were treatment-naïve for BM. Patients received lapatinib (1250 mg/day continuously) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m² on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle). All patients were treated with trastuzumab either in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. No patients had received prior lapatinib and/or capecitabine. End-points were response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity.ResultsThe overall response rate (ORR) was 33.3% (7/21) and all were partial response. For patients receiving prior WBRT and patients receiving LC as first line treatment for BCBM the ORR was 31.2% (5/16) and 40.0% (2/5) respectively. Median PFS was 5.5 months. Median OS was 11 months. Treatment-related adverse events were manageable. Grade 3–4 toxicities were hand-foot syndrome (14.3%), diarrhea (14.3%), nausea/vomiting (9.5%), mucositis (4.8%), and skin rash (4.8%).ConclusionThe combination of LC is active and well-tolerated treatment in patients with HER2+ve BCBM.     

Ofatumumab,a Novel CD20 Monoclonal Antibody,Is Active in Patients With Fludarabine- and Alemtuzumab-Refractory or Bulky Fludarabine-Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Irrespective of Prior Rituximab

Ofatumumab, a novel CD20 monoclonal antibody, produces high response rates regardless of prior rituximab exposure in patients with fludarabine- and alemtuzumab-refractory or bulky fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Full AbstractBackgroundPatients with CLL refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab (FA-ref) or refractory to fludarabine with bulky (> 5 cm) lymphadenopathy (BF-ref) have poor outcomes with current salvage therapy (overall response rate [ORR], 23%; overall survival [OS], 9 months). Ofatumumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds a distinct membrane-proximal epitope on the CD20 molecule and elicits more efficient in vitro complement-dependent cytotoxicity of B-cell lines and primary tumor cells versus rituximab. We assessed whether prior rituximab exposure impacted outcomes with ofatumumab in patients with FA-ref or BF-ref CLL enrolled in an international, pivotal trial.Patients and MethodsPatients received 8 weekly ofatumumab infusions followed by 4 monthly infusions (infusion, 1300 mg; infusions 2–12, 2000 mg). The primary endpoint was ORR (1996 NCI-WG criteria) assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee over 24 weeks. Secondary efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and OS.ResultsIn the 59 FA-ref and 79 BF-ref patients at the planned interim analysis, ORR was 58% (95% CI, 40%–74%) and 47% (95% CI, 32%-62%), respectively. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.5–8.0 months) and 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.9–6.4 months), and median OS was 13.7 months (95% CI, 9.4-[not yet reached] months) and 15.4 months (95% CI, 10.2-20.2 months), respectively. In the subgroup of FA-ref (n = 35) and BF-ref (n = 43) patients who previously received a rituximab-containing regimen, ORR was 54% and 44%, and median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7–8.0 months) and 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.8–6.4 months), respectively. In FA-ref and BF-ref patients refractory to fludarabine in combination with rituximab and cyclophosphamide (n = 16 in each group), ORR was 50% and 44%, and median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.3–6.4 months) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.1–6.6 months), respectively.ConclusionSingle-agent ofatumumab is active in patients with FA-ref and BF-ref CLL, irrespective of prior anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy with rituximab, including refractoriness to fludarabine-based regimens containing rituximab.     

Outcome of Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors

IntroductionAlthough frequent in NSCLC, patients with brain metastases (BMs) are often excluded from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials. We evaluated BM outcome in a less-selected NSCLC cohort.MethodsData from consecutive patients with advanced ICI-treated NSCLC were collected. Active BMs were defined as new and/or growing lesions without any subsequent local treatment before the start of ICI treatment. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Multivariate analyses were performed by using a Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression.ResultsA total of 1025 patients were included; the median follow-up time from start of ICI treatment was 15.8 months. Of these patients, 255 (24.9%) had BMs (39.2% active, 14.3% symptomatic, and 27.4% being treated with steroids). Disease-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (ds-GPA) score was known for 94.5% of patients (35.7% with a score of 0–1, 58.5% with a score of 1.5–2.5, and 5.8% with a score of 3). The ORRs with BM versus without BM were similar: 20.6% (with BM) versus 22.7% (without BM) (p = 0.484). The intracranial ORR (active BM with follow-up brain imaging [n = 73]) was 27.3%. The median progression-free survival times were 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5–2.1) and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.9–2.5) months, respectively (p = 0.009). Of the patients with BMs, 12.7% had a dissociated cranial-extracranial response and two (0.8%) had brain pseudoprogression. Brain progression occurred more in active BM than in stable BM (54.2% versus 30% [p < 0.001]). The median OS times were 8.6 months (95% CI: 6.8–12.0) with BM and 11.4 months (95% CI: 8.6–13.8) months with no BM (p = 0.035). In the BM subgroup multivariate analysis, corticosteroid use (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.37) was associated with poorer OS, whereas stable BMs (HR = 0.62) and higher ds-GPA classification (HR = 0.48–0.52) were associated with improved OS.ConclusionIn multivariate analysis BMs are not associated with a poorer survival in patients with ICI-treated NSCLC. Stable patients with BM without baseline corticosteroids and a good ds-GPA classification have the best prognosis.     

A phase II randomized study evaluating the addition of iniparib to gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundIniparib is a novel anticancer agent initially considered a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, but subsequently shown to act via non-selective protein modification through cysteine adducts. This randomized phase II study investigated the addition of iniparib to gemcitabine–cisplatin in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.Patients and methodsPatients with histologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC were randomized 2 : 1 to receive gemcitabine (1250 mg/m², days 1/8) and cisplatin (75 mg/m², day 1) with [gemcitabine/cisplatin/iniparib (GCI)] or without [gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC)] iniparib (5.6 mg/kg, days 1/4/8/11) every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The study was not designed for formal efficacy comparison, the control arm being to benchmark results against the literature.ResultsOne hundred and nineteen patients were randomized (39 GC and 80 GCI). More GCI patients were male (80% GCI and 67% GC) and had PS 0 (61% GCI and 49% GC). The ORR was 25.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.0%–42.1%] with GC versus 20.0% (95% CI 11.9%–30.4%) with GCI, which did not allow rejection of the null hypothesis (ORR with GCI ≤20%; P = 0.545). Median PFS was 4.3 (95% CI 2.8–5.6) months with GC and 5.7 (95% CI 4.6–6.6) months with GCI (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.56–1.40). Median OS was 8.5 (95% CI 5.5 to not reached) months with GC, and 12.0 (95% CI 8.9–17.1) months with GCI (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.48–1.27). More GCI patients received second-line treatment (51% GC and 68% GCI). Toxicity was similar in the two arms. Grade 3–4 toxicities included asthenia (28% GC and 8% GCI), nausea (3% GC and 14% GCI), and decreased appetite (10% in each).ConclusionsAddition of iniparib to GC did not improve ORR over GC alone. The GCI safety profile was comparable to GC alone. Imbalances in PS and gender distribution may have impacted study results regarding PFS and OS.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT01086254.     

Effectiveness of bevacizumab added to standard chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: final results for first-line treatment from the ITACa randomized clinical trial

BackgroundWe report the results from a first-line phase III randomized clinical trial on metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of adding bevacizumab (B) to standard first-line chemotherapy (CT).Patients and methodsmCRC patients were randomized to receive first-line CT (FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4) plus B (arm A) or CT only (arm B). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate (ORR) and safety. Three hundred and fifty patients and 310 events were required to have an 80% statistical power to detect a difference in PFS between the groups.ResultsBetween November 2007 and March 2012, 376 patients were randomized. About 60% of patients received FOLFOX4 and 40% FOLFIRI. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 343 progressions and 275 deaths had been observed in the overall population. The median PFS was 9.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2–10.3] and 8.4 (95% CI 7.2–9.0) months for arms A and B, respectively, with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.70–1.07; P = 0.182). No statistically significant differences in OS or ORR were observed. B-containing regimens were associated with more frequent hypertension, bleeding, proteinuria and asthenia.ConclusionsThe addition of B to standard first-line CT for mCRC did not provide a benefit in terms of PFS, OS or ORR. Further research is warranted to better identify the target population.Clinical trial numberNCT01878422.     

Circulating tumor cells predict progression-free and overall survival in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer,HER2-positive or triple-negative (CBCSG004): a multicenter,double-blind,prospective trial

BackgroundThe aim of this multicenter, double-blind, prospective study was to evaluate the potential utility of circulating tumor cell (CTC) measurements in predicting responses to anticancer therapies, including response to human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-targeted agents, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in Chinese women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and methodsThree hundred MBC patients planned to complete three CTC blood draws and two imaging studies.ResultsA total of 294 of the 300 MBC patients enrolled from six leading Chinese cancer centers were assessable. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, the baseline CTC number remained an independent prognostic factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.39–2.69; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.76; 95% CI = 2.35–6.01; P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for CTC counts at the first follow-up visit for both PFS (P = 0.049) and OS (P < 0.001).ConclusionsEnumeration of CTCs in Chinese MBC patients provides substantial prognostic information and is an independent factor associated with PFS and OS. Moreover, we demonstrated the prognostic value in the various disease subtypes, including HER-2-positive disease irrespective of therapy.     

Loss of PTEN expression as a predictor of resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: evidence from retrospective studies

Purpose

To investigate the predictive value of loss of PTEN expression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal therapy.

Methods

Studies were systematically identified to investigate the relationship between PTEN expression and clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAbs. Clinical outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The pooled relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model according to the heterogeneity between the studies.

Results

A total of 852 patients were included in the final meta-analysis. The rate of loss of PTEN expression was 28.4 % (242/852). The overall pooled RR for ORR was 0.413 (95 % confidence intervals (CI), 0.177–0.965) when patients with loss of PTEN expression were compared with those with normal PTEN expression. Anti-EGFR monoclonal therapy resulted in improved PFS (HR, 0.466; 95 % CI, 0.292–0.640) and OS (HR, 0.689 [95 % CI, 0.482–0.896]) in patients unselected by KRAS mutation with normal PTEN expression over loss of PTEN expression. A better prognosis, as reflected by PFS (HR, 0.344; 95 % CI, 0.154–0.533) and OS (HR, 0.544; 95 % CI, 0.285–0.803), was observed in wild-type KRAS patients with normal PTEN expression versus loss of expression.

Conclusions

Loss of expression of PTEN is a potential biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal therapy, particularly in mCRC patients with KRAS wild type.     

Crizotinib achieves long-lasting disease control in advanced papillary renal-cell carcinoma type 1 patients with MET mutations or amplification. EORTC 90101 CREATE trial

PurposePapillary renal-cell carcinoma type 1 (PRCC1) is associated with MET gene alterations. Our phase II trial prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced/metastatic PRCC1 with or without MET mutations (MET+ and MET−).Experimental designEligible patients with reference pathology-confirmed PRCC1 received 250 mg oral crizotinib twice daily. Patients were attributed to MET+/MET− sub-cohorts by the sequencing of exons 16–19 of the MET gene in tumour tissue. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR). If at least two of the first 12 eligible and evaluable MET+ patients achieved a confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) (in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1), a maximum of 35 patients were enrolled. Secondary end-points included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS rate (PFSR), overall survival (OS) and safety.ResultsForty-one patients provided consent, of whom 23 were eligible, treated and evaluable. In four MET+ patients, two achieved PR and one had stable disease (SD) (ORR 50%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8–93.2), DOR was 21.8 and 37.3 months, 1-year PFSR: 75.0% (95% CI: 12.8–96.1) and 1-year OS: 75.0% (95% CI: 12.8–96.1). Among 16 MET− patients, one achieved a PR lasting more than 9.9 months and 11 had SD (ORR: 6.3%; 95% CI: 0.2–30.2), 1-year PFSR: 27.3% (95% CI: 8.5–50.4) and 1-year OS: 71.8% (95% CI: 41.1–88.4). Among three patients with unknown MET status (MET?) due to technical failure, one achieved PR lasting more than 6.9 months, and one had SD (ORR 33.3%, 95% CI: 0.8–90.6), 1-year PFSR: 66.7% (95% CI: 5.4–94.5) and 1-year OS: 100%. MET amplification was found post hoc in one MET+ patient (PR, DOR: 37.3 months), and one MET− case who had SD. Common treatment-related adverse events were oedema (47.8%), fatigue (47.8%), nausea (39.1%), diarrhoea (39.1%) and blurred vision (34.8%).ConclusionCrizotinib is active and well tolerated in advanced, metastatic PRCC1, achieving objective responses and long-lasting disease control in patients with MET mutations or amplification. Sporadic, durable responses are also seen in MET− and MET? cases, suggesting the presence of other alterations of MET or alternative pathways.     

Final Overall Survival and Other Efficacy and Safety Results From ASCEND-3: Phase II Study of Ceritinib in ALKi-Naive Patients With ALK-Rearranged NSCLC

IntroductionThe phase II, single-arm ASCEND-3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ceritinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor (ALKi)–naive patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC who had received at least three previous lines of chemotherapy. Here, we report the final efficacy and safety results.MethodsEligible patients (including those with asymptomatic or neurologically stable brain metastases) received oral ceritinib (750 mg/day, fasted). The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were Blinded Independent Review Committee–assessed ORR; investigator- and Blinded Independent Review Committee–assessed overall intracranial response rate, duration of response, time to response, disease control rate, and progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); and safety. Exploratory end points included patient-reported outcomes.ResultsOf the 124 patients enrolled, 122 (98.4%) had received previous antineoplastic medications (31 patients [25.0%] received at least three regimens), and 49 (39.5%) had baseline brain metastases. The median follow-up time (data cutoff: January 22, 2018) was 52.1 (range, 48.4–60.1) months. The investigator-assessed ORR was 67.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.8–75.9), and the median PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI: 11.0–23.2). The median OS was 51.3 months (95% CI: 42.7–55.3). Most common adverse events (all grades, ≥60% of patients, all-causality) were diarrhea (85.5%), nausea (78.2%), and vomiting (71.8%). Overall, 18 patients (14.5%) had an adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. Health-related quality of life was maintained during ceritinib treatment.ConclusionsCeritinib exhibited prolonged and clinically meaningful OS, PFS, and duration of response in chemotherapy-pretreated (at least three lines), ALKi-naive patients with ALK+ NSCLC. The safety profile was consistent with that reported in previous studies.     

PIK3CA exon 20 mutations as a potential biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to dissect the association between PIK3CA mutations and resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) according to PIK3CA exon of mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).MethodsWe systematically identified studies exploring the association between PIK3CA mutations and clinical outcomes of mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAbs. The primary clinical outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The pooled relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by using fixed effect model or random effect model according to heterogeneity between studies.ResultsThirteen studies were considered eligible, with 576 mCRC patients included. In KRAS wild-type mCRC patients, we observed a lower ORR in patients with PIK3CA exon 20 mutations [3 studies, 377 patients; ORR = 0% versus 37%; RR = 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–1.19; P = 0.082], although the result was not statistically significant because of the small sample size. Only one study provided survival data according to the PIK3CA exon of the mutations, in which PIK3CA exon 20 mutations were statistically significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.33–4.78; P = 0.013) and OS (HR = 3.29; 95% CI 1.60–6.74; P = 0.006) in KRAS wild-type mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAbs. The predictive power of exon 20 mutation is greater than exon 9 mutations and all exons mutations in terms of ORR, PFS, and OS.ConclusionThese analyses suggest that PIK3CA exon 20 mutations may be a potential biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR MoAbs in KRAS wild-type mCRC.     

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of cancers: A meta‐analysis of 27 prospective clinical trials

Immune checkpoint inhibition therapy has benefited people and shown powerful anti‐tumor activity during the past several years. Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody against PD‐1, is a widely studied immune checkpoint inhibitor for the treatment of cancers. To assess the safety and efficacy of nivolumab, 27 clinical trials on nivolumab were analyzed. Results showed that the summary risks of all grade adverse effects (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs were 0.65 and 0.12. The rate of nivolumab‐related death was 0.25%. The most common any grade AEs were fatigue (25.1%), rush (13.0%), pruritus (12.5%), diarrhea (12.1%), nausea (11.8%) and asthenia (10.4%). The most common grade ≥3 AEs were hypophosphatemia (only 2.3%) and lymphopenia (only 2.1%). The pooled objective response rate (ORR), 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) rate and 1‐year overall survival (OS) rate were 0.26, 0.40 and 0.52, respectively. The odds ratio of ORR between PD‐L1 positive and negative was 2.34 (95% CI 1.77–3.10, p < 0.0001). The odds ratios of ORR, 6‐month PFS rate and 1‐year OS rate between nivolumab and chemotherapeutics were 2.77 (95% CI 1.69–4.56, p < 0.0001), 1.97 (95% CI 1.02–3.81, p = 0.04) and 1.87 (95% CI 1.46–2.40, p <0.0001), respectively. In conclusion, nivolumab has durable outcomes with tolerable AEs and drug‐related deaths in cancer patients. Nivolumab monotherapy has better treatment response compared with chemotherapy, whereas chemotherapeutics have significantly higher risk of adverse effects than nivolumab.     

The relationship between treatment-induced hypertension and efficacy of anlotinib in recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objective:In this post-hoc analysis, we evaluated anlotinib treatment-induced hypertension as a potential predictive factor of efficacy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.Methods:A total of 109 patients enrolled in the anlotinib group in a phase 2 trial were included. The tumor response was assessed by computed tomography at week 3, week 6, and then every 6 weeks until progressive disease was observed. The primary endpoint of the study was progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).Results:In all patients, the median PFS was 3.02 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.63–3.65 months] and the OS was 6.11 months (95% CI: 4.40–7.79 months). The ORR was 7.34% (95% CI: 3.22%–13.95%). A total of 59 (54%) patients were diagnosed with treatment-induced hypertension (Group A), and the remaining patients (n = 50, 46%) were in Group B. Baseline prognostic factors were similar between the 2 groups. Patients in Group A had a longer PFS and OS and higher ORR. When stratifying patients using a previously known history of hypertension, treatment-induced hypertension was a predictor only for patients without previous hypertension, who had longer PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24–0.68] and OS (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.21–0.67).Conclusions:We showed, for the first time, a correlation between treatment-induced hypertension and better prognoses in recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients treated with anlotinib, without a previously known history of hypertension. Treatment-induced hypertension may be a simple and low cost predictor for anlotinib antitumor efficacy in these patients, which may also reflect the intended target inhibition.     

Phase II study of bevacizumab with liposomal doxorubicin for patients with platinum- and taxane-resistant ovarian cancer

BackgroundSuppression of neoangiogenesis and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) each contribute to the management of platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. The aim of this study is to test the combination of bevacizumab and PLD in women with resistant or refractory ovarian cancer.MethodsEligibility criteria were no more than two prior treatments with platinum-containing regimens and one additional regimen, without anthracyclines. Treatment was administered every 3 weeks (bevacizumab 15 mg/kg beginning on cycle 2 and PLD 30 mg/m²). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months; the secondary end points included side-effects, overall response rates (ORR) and survival (OS).ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled. The average number of courses administered was 7. The median PFS was 6.6 months (range 1–24.6 months) according to Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Committee (GCIC) criteria and 7.8 months (range 2–13.3 months) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The median OS was 33.2 months (range 3–37.5+ months). The ORR was 30.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.2–46.1] and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 86.1% (95% CI 72.1–94.7). Adverse events included mucosal and dermal erosions (30% grade 3) and asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction. Additional toxic effects included hypertension, headache, renal dysfunction and proteinuria, wound healing delay, and one episode each of central nervous system (CNS) ischemia and hemolytic uremic syndrome.ConclusionPLD with bevacizumab has improved activity in recurrent ovarian cancer with increased toxicity.     

The efficacy of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Although both bevacizumab and paclitaxel significantly improve the efficacy of chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), little have changed with overall survival rates when they have been used alone or combined with other chemotherapy. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel in HER2-negative MBC patients. Pubmed and Embase were systematically reviewed for studies published up to September 2013 in which bevacizumab plus paclitaxel were compared with other chemotherapy. Primary outcomes comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Eight phase II/III clinical trials met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 3,758 patients. The pooled results showed that combination of bevacizumab and paclitaxel significantly improved the PFS (HR?=?0.63, 95 % CI, 0.55–0.73, P?=?0.011), ORR (RR?=?1.28, 95 % CI, 0.96–1.70, P?=?0.0), but had no effect on OS (HR?=?0.91, 95 % CI, 0.81–1.01, P?=?0.855). The meta-analysis confirms the benefits of bevacizumab–paclitaxel combination therapy in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer, with an improvement in both progression free survival and objective response rate. However, no significant OS benefit was observed.