Tanreqing injection for acute bronchitis disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundAcute bronchitis (AB) is one of the common diseases. Tanreqing injection (TRQ) was widely used to treat patients with acute bronchitis, and many randomized controlled trials have been conducted to investigate its efficacy.ObjectiveThe purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRQ for AB.MethodsEight English and Chinese electronic databases, up to October 2014, were searched to identify randomized controlled trials on TRQ for AB. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of each trial by using Cochrane handbook. Meta-analysis was carried out by using Review Manager software.ResultA total of 49 trials with 5131 participants were collected. Data of three main outcomes were pooled and analyzed as following: (1) effective rates: TRQ versus antibiotics (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.05, 1.18; P = 0.0002); TRQ plus antiviral drugs versus antiviral drugs (RR: 5.12; 95% CI 3.03, 8.66; P < 0.00001); TRQ plus antibiotics versus antibiotics (RR 3.46; 95% CI 2.59, 4.62; P < 0.00001); TRQ versus antibiotics plus antiviral drugs (RR 2.03; 95% CI 1.10, 3.74; P = 0.02); TRQ plus conventional therapy versus conventional therapy alone (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.15, 1.27; P < 0.00001). (2) Time for fever resolution: TRQ plus antiviral drugs versus antiviral drugs (MD: −1.08; 95% CI −1.59, −0.57; P < 0.00001); TRQ plus antibiotics versus antibiotics (MD −1.33; 95% CI −1.81, −0.86; P < 0.00001); TRQ versus antibiotics plus antiviral drugs (MD −0.88; 95% CI −1.25, −0.51; P < 0.00001); TRQ plus conventional therapy versus conventional therapy alone (MD −1.06; 95% CI −1.13, −0.98; P < 0.00001). (3) Resolution of cough: TRQ plus antiviral drugs versus antiviral drugs (MD: −2.09; 95% CI −3.11, −1.43; P < 0.00001); TRQ plus antibiotics versus antibiotics (MD: −2.65; 95% CI −2.88, −2.42; P < 0.00001); TRQ plus conventional therapy versus conventional therapy alone (MD −1.84; 95% CI −2.85, −0.83; P = 0.0003). Four trials described the adverse drug reactions of TRQ, while no severe adverse drug reactions reported.ConclusionsAs a therapy for AB, TRQ has potentially beneficial effect in improving effective rates, reducing the time to resolution of fever, cough, crackles and absorption of shadows on X-ray. However, due to the limitations of methodological quality of the included trials, it is difficult to make a conclusive recommendation about TRQ treating patients with AB. Further rigorous clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRQ.     

The effectiveness of nurse-led care in people with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

Objectives

The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of nurse-led care in rheumatoid arthritis.

Design

Systematic review of effectiveness.

Data sources

Electronic databases (AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, HMIC, HTA, MEDLINE, NHEED, Ovid Nursing and PsycINFO) were searched from 1988 to January 2010 with no language restrictions. Inclusion criteria were: randomised controlled trials, nurse-led care being part of the intervention and including patients with RA.

Review methods

Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Quality assessment was conducted independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool. For each outcome measure, the effect size was assessed using risk ratio or ratio of means (RoM) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) as appropriate. Where possible, data from similar outcomes were pooled in a meta-analysis.

Results

Seven records representing 4 RCTs with an overall low risk of bias (good quality) were included in the review. They included 431 patients and the interventions (nurse-led care vs usual care) lasted for 1-2 years. Most effect sizes of disease activity measures were inconclusive (DAS28 RoM = 0.96, 95%CI [0.90-1.02], P = 0.16; plasma viscosity RoM = 1 95%CI [0.8-1.26], p = 0.99) except the Ritchie Articular Index (RoM = 0.89, 95%CI [0.84-0.95], P < 0.001) which favoured nurse-led care. Results from some secondary outcomes (functional status, stiffness and coping with arthritis) were also inconclusive. Other outcomes (satisfaction and pain) displayed mixed results when assessed using different tools making them also inconclusive. Significant effects of nurse-led care were seen in quality of life (RAQoL RoM = 0.83, 95%CI [0.75-0.92], P < 0.001), patient knowledge (PKQ RoM = 4.39, 95%CI [3.35-5.72], P < 0.001) and fatigue (median difference = −330, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

The estimates of the primary outcome and most secondary outcomes showed no significant difference between nurse-led care and the usual care. While few outcomes favoured nurse-led care, there is insufficient evidence to conclude whether this is the case. More good quality RCTs of nurse-led care effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis are required.     

Blueberry and cardiovascular disease risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background and aimsCardiovascular disease (CVD) remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity that can be prevented by the consumption of healthy foods. These include blueberry, a dark coloured berry containing extremely high amounts of functional ingredients. We therefore examined the extent to which supplementation with blueberry effects on CVD risk indices.MethodsWe searched the ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane Library on March 2020 and checked reference lists from primary studies and review articles for any additional studies. No language restrictions were applied. All randomized and controlled clinical trials (RCTs) using blueberry supplements to modify CVD risk factors were included in our analysis.ResultsMean Difference (MD) was pooled using a random effects model and 11 studies were included in the final analysis. Pooled effect size showed that supplementation with blueberry had a small insignificant effect in reducing plasma triglycerides (MD = −0.27 mmol/l; 95 % CI: −0.57, 0.17, p = 0.06). Although current study found no differences between blueberry and control groups for any other outcomes, subgroup analysis suggested a favourable impact of blueberry on reducing body weight. Significant weight loss was indicated from studies longer with a follow up of more than 6 weeks or with blueberry powder or freeze-dried blueberry.ConclusionCurrent evidence is insufficient to show a benefit of blueberry supplements in modifying CVD risk factors across a variety of adult populations. Robust data and larger studies are required to assess potential effects.     

Effects of health qigong on sleep quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ObjectiveThis study assessed the effects of Health Qigong on sleep quality in adults.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.MethodWe searched 10 databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English or Chinese languages that evaluated the effects of Health Qigong on sleep quality in participants aged ≥18 years old with or without diseases in comparison with any type of controls. Quality of the included studies was assessed by the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The between-group treatment effect size was estimated by calculating Hedges’ g and associated confidence interval (CI) through a random effects model. Cochran’s Q test and I² were used to determine heterogeneity.ResultsThe initial search yielded 730 articles, of which 13 studies involving 1147 participants were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall effect size was −0.955 (95 % CI: −1.601 to −0.309, p = 0.004). A homogeneity test revealed high heterogeneity (Q = 278.187, p < 0.001, I² = 95.686 %). A sensitivity analysis was conducted through the exclusion of an outlier, which revealed a small but statistically significant effect size (Hedges’ g = −0.423, 95 % CI: −0.603 to −0.243, p < 0.001; Q = 18.073, p = 0.08, I² = 39.137 %).ConclusionsOur study results suggest that Health Qigong is beneficial for improving sleep quality in adults with and without disease. However, the effects of Health Qigong could be partially due to nonspecific effects as half of the included studies did not employ an active control.     

Adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction

The evidence for adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation is inconclusive. We systematically reviewed the efficacy of adrenaline for adult OHCA.

Methods

We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to July 2013 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating standard dose adrenaline (SDA) to placebo, high dose adrenaline (HDA), or vasopressin (alone or combination) in adult OHCA patients. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects modeling. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified by cardiac rhythm and by number of drug doses. The primary outcome was survival to discharge and the secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to admission, and neurological outcome.

Results

Fourteen RCTs (n = 12,246) met inclusion criteria: one compared SDA to placebo (n = 534), six compared SDA to HDA (n = 6174), six compared SDA to an adrenaline/vasopressin combination (n = 5202), and one compared SDA to vasopressin alone (n = 336). There was no survival to discharge or neurological outcome differences in any comparison group, including subgroup analyses. SDA showed improved ROSC (RR 2.80, 95%CI 1.78–4.41, p < 0.001) and survival to admission (RR 1.95, 95%CI 1.34–2.84, p < 0.001) compared to placebo. SDA showed decreased ROSC (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.75–0.97, p = 0.02; I² = 48%) and survival to admission (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76–1.00, p = 0.049; I² = 34%) compared to HDA. There were no differences in outcomes between SDA and vasopressin alone or in combination with adrenaline.

Conclusions

There was no benefit of adrenaline in survival to discharge or neurological outcomes. There were improved rates of survival to admission and ROSC with SDA over placebo and HDA over SDA.     

The effects of garlic supplementation on oxidative stress markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ObjectiveRecent studies have found that garlic supplementation can improve antioxidant status, however, there is no definitive consensus on this context. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of garlic supplementation on oxidative stress markers.SettingWe searched titles, abstracts, and keywords of relevant articles indexed in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to November 2019 to identify eligible RCT studies. To compare the effects of garlic with placebo, weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were pooled based on the random-effects model. Quality assessment was performed using a Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.ResultsOverall, 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 317 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Based on the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool, five studies were considered as good quality and two studies were fair. We found that garlic supplementation significantly increased total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (WMD =11.03 mmol/L; 95 % CI: 4.78, 17.28 mmol/L; P < 0.001) and decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels (WMD = −1.88 mmol/L; 95 % CI: −3.30, −0.46 mmol/L; P = 0.01) compared with the control group.ConclusionIn summary, the current meta-analysis indicated that garlic supplementation might improve oxidative stress markers. However, these findings are incomplete due to the paucity of studies, and further well-designed clinical trials are needed in this field to confirm the effect of garlic supplement on oxidative stress markers.     

Flavonoid-containing supplements for preventing acute respiratory tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials

BackgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of flavonoid-containing supplements in preventing acute respiratory tract infection (ARTI).MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of flavonoid-containing supplements on ARTI prevention in the aspects of ARTI incidence, mean ARTI sick days, symptoms, bio-immune markers, and adverse effects were searched in 5 databases. Data were searched from inception to November 26, 2021. Stata 16.0 was used to perform the meta-analysis.ResultsTwenty RCTs (n = 4521) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that in the flavonoid-containing supplement group, the ARTI incidence and mean ARTI sick days were significantly decreased compared to those in the control group (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74–0.89, p < 0.001; WMD = −0.56, 95% CI: −1.04 to −0.08, p = 0.021; respectively). In 8 RCTs, flavonoids were singly used for interventions, ARTI incidence in the experimental group significantly decreased compared to that in the control group (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72–1.00, p = 0.047). In ten RCTs, flavonoid-containing mixtures were applied for interventions, and ARTI incidence in the experimental group significantly decreased compared to that in the control group (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71–0.89, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the ARTI incidence and mean ARTI sick days were significantly decreased in the experimental group compared to those in the control group in the flavan-3-ols subgroup (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67–0.92, p = 0.002; WMD = −2.75, 95% CI: −4.30 to −1.21, p < 0.001; respectively) and the multiple subclasses subgroup (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63–0.88, p = 0.001; WMD = −0.56, 95% CI: −1.11 to −0.01, p = 0.046; respectively). However, the bio-immune markers including interleukin-6, hypersensitive-c-reactive-protein, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interferon-γ did not differ between the flavonoid group and the control group. Moreover, in the flavonoid-containing supplement group, the incidence of adverse reactions did not increase compared to that in the control group (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.78–1.73, p = 0.469).ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis showed that flavonoid-containing supplements were efficacious and safe in preventing ARTIs. The most important limitations result from the small number of trials, poor quality of some included RCTs, differences in the composition and types of interventions, principal subclasses of flavonoids, methods of administration, and methodology. Moreover, only a few RCTs conducted independent verification of the flavonoid supplements used in the trial in terms of purity and potency, which may lead to a potential source of bias. Thus, larger and better-designed studies are needed to further verify this conclusion.     

Non-pharmacological interventions for anxiety in burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AimPresent review aimed to conduct a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) on reducing anxiety in adult burn patients.MethodWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases through September 2019 for randomized clinical trials comparing NPIs to a control group. The primary outcomes were general anxiety and pain anxiety. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. All data was pooled with Revman 5.3.Results20 studies were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Compared to routine care, Music (4 Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs), Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = –2.00, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) = –3.21 to –0.79), massage (4 RCTs, SMD= –1.84, 95 % CI= –2.77 to –0.91), hypnosis (2 RCTs, SMD= −1.06, 95 % CI= −2.90 to 0.78), relaxation (2 RCTs, SMD= −0.77, 95 %CI= −1.52 to −0.02), transcranial direct current stimulation (1 RCT, SMD= −1.92, 95 %CI= −2.54 to −1.30), and therapeutic touch practices (1 RCT, SMD=−0.45 95 %CI= −0.86 to −0.04), were associated with a significant effect on the anxiety of burn patients. Aromatherapy interventions and virtual reality showed no evidence of a reduction in the anxiety. A large amount of heterogeneity exist among trials. Risk of bias varied across studies. Only one study reported on safety issues.ConclusionDue to weak evidence, we are unable to make strong recommendations in favor of NPIs for burn anxiety. Further well-designed large sample size randomized clinical trials are warranted.     

Pediatric Tui Na for cough in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pediatric Tui Na for the treatment of cough in children under seven years of age.Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.MethodsWe searched seven major databases and two ongoing trial registers before November 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pediatric Tui Na for cough in children. Main outcome measures were cough related status (such as cough frequency, severity, and duration), use of western medicines, quality of life, medical costs, recurrence rate, adverse events and acceptance. Two reviewers independentlyselected studies and extracted data. Results were presented by RevMan 5.4 as risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs), both with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias were assessed using ROB tools and quality of evidence by GRADE.ResultsSixteen RCTs involving 1502 participants were included in this review. Most trials were poor in quality for not reporting allocation concealment, blinding of outcomeassessment or outcome data completeness. The pooled results demonstrated that pediatric Tui Na alone (2 RCTs, 205 participants; MD −2.22, 95 %CI −3.71 to −0.73; P = 0.004; I ² = 90 %; low certainty) or combined with conventional treatment (7 RCTs, 668 participants; MD −1.66, 95 %CI −2.89 to −0.44; P = 0.008; I ² = 98 %; low certainty) shortened cough duration. The combined treatment also decreased the recurrence rate of cough (3 RCTs, 135 participants; RR 0.35, 95 %CI 0.21–0.58; P < 0.0001; I ² = 0 %; moderate certainty). There were insufficient data on adverse events.ConclusionsThis review indicates that pediatric Tui Na may shorten the course and decrease the recurrence rate of cough in children, and appears to be relatively safe. However, large-sample, multi-center and high-quality RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.     

The effect of cinnamon supplementation on liver enzymes in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AimsThe aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the effect of cinnamon supplementation on liver enzymes.MethodsA systematic search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed-Medline, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science up to November 2020. We used a random effects model to estimate pooled effect size of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels.ResultsSeven RCTs (9 treatment arms) fulfilled the eligibility criteria of the present meta-analysis. Overall, meta-analysis could not show any beneficial effect of cinnamon supplementation on AST, ALT, and ALP. Subgroup analyses showed that the effect of cinnamon supplementation on ALT was significant at the dosages of <1500 mg/day (Hedges’s: -0.61; 95 % CI: -1.11, -0.10; P = 0.002), in trials lasting>12 weeks (Hedges’s: -0.83; 95 % CI: -1.36, -0.30; P = 0.01), and in trials conducted of both gender (Hedges’s: -0.72; 95 % CI: -1.45, -0.01; P = 0.04).ConclusionIn summary, cinnamon supplementation had no significant effect on liver enzymes in adults. However, the effect of cinnamon on ALT levels was significant at the dosages of <1500 mg/day, in trials lasting>12 weeks, and in trials conducted of both gender. Nevertheless, further studies should be performed to confirm our results.     

The effect of almond intake on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ObjectiveThe present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed determine the efficacy of almond intake on blood pressure (BP).MethodsPubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane library and Google Scholar were comprehensively searched to infinity until December 2019. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting effects of almond intake on aortic and brachial BP were included. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Standard methods were used for assessment of heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs (1128 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis suggested that almond intake can reduced diastolic BP (DBP) (WMD = -1.30 mmHg; 95 % CI: -2.31,-0.30, p = 0.01, I² = 0.0 %). However, there was not any impact of almond intake on systolic BP (SBP) (WMD = -0.83 mmHg; 95 % CI: -2.55, 0.89, p = 0.34, I² = 58.9 %). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in SBP levels in subjects with lower SBP and lower dose of almonds.ConclusionWe found that almonds might have a considerable favorite effect in BP and especially in DBP, and it could be encouraged as part of a healthy diet; however due to the high calorie content, the intake should be part of healthy diet.     

Therapeutic effects and safety of oral Chinese patent medicine for COVID-19: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IntroductionChinese patent medicine (CPM) is an indispensable part of traditional Chinese medicine. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) manifests is an acute respiratory infectious disease. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects and safety of oral CPM for COVID-19.MethodsWe included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that tested oral CPM for the treatment of COVID-19 identified from publications in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Web of Science, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, BioRxiv, MedRxiv and arXiv before November 2nd, 2020. The risk of bias for each trial was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. RevMan 5.4 software was used for data analyses. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the online GRADEpro tool.ResultsSeven RCTs including 1079 participants were identified. The overall bias was assessed as “-high risk of bias” for all included trials. Oral CPM investigated were: Lianhua Qingwen capsule/granules (LHQW), Jinhua Qinggan granules (JHQG), Huoxiang Zhengqi dripping pills (HXZQ), Toujie Quwen granules (TJQW) and Lianhua Qingke granules (LHQK). Compared with conventional western therapy alone for people with COVID-19: regarding the main outcomes, the results showed that oral CPM combined with conventional western therapy improved cure rate (RR = 1.20, 95 % CI 1.04–1.38, involving LHQW and TJQW), reduced aggravation rate (RR = 0.50, 95 % CI 0.29 – 0.85, involving LHQW, JHQG, LHQK and TJQW); with regard to additional outcomes, the results showed that add-on oral CPM shortened the duration of fever, cough and fatigue, improved the recovery rate of cough and fatigue, and increased the improvement and recovery rate of chest CT manifestations. There were some differences in therapeutic effects among various CPMs for the same COVID-19 outcome. The use of TJQW and LHQG appeared not to increase the risk of adverse events, but JHQG may cause mild diarrhea.ConclusionLow-certainty or very low-certainty evidence demonstrated that oral CPM may have add-on potential therapeutic effects for patients with non-serious COVID-19. These findings need to be further confirmed by well-designed clinical trials with adequate sample sizes.     

Pilates for neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BackgroundAlthough widely used in clinical practice, evidence on the effectiveness of the Pilates method in people with neck pain has not been adequately summarised yet.ObjectiveTo systematically review the literature on the effectiveness of the Pilates method on improving pain and disability in patients with neck pain.MethodsWe performed searches in multiple databases from their inception to October 2021. We included randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of the Pilates method with other treatments on pain and disability in patients with neck pain. Two authors independently selected studies, rated risk of bias, extracted data, and judged the overall certainty of evidence using GRADE.ResultsWe included five RCTs (n = 224 participants). There is low certainty evidence that Pilates method did not significantly improve pain compared to other treatments at short-term (mean difference (MD): MD: 9.29 points, 95% CI -25.84 to 7.26; I2 = 93%). Low certainty evidence suggested that the Pilates method did not significantly improve disability compared to other treatments at short-term (MD: 3.20 points, 95% CI -7.70 to 1.30; I² = 75%).ConclusionBased on low certainty evidence, the Pilates method is not better than other treatments at 3 months to reduce pain and disability. High quality trials are required.     

Effects of Spirulina supplementation on obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

ObjectiveEvidence has suggested that Spirulina supplementation may affect anthropometric indices. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to summarize published randomized clinical trials which assess the effect of Spirulina supplementation on obesity.SettingPertinent studies were identified using Embase, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane library databases up to May 2019. Mean Differences (MD) were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were reported using standard methods.ResultsResults of 5 studies (7 treatment arms) showed a significant reduction in weight (MD: -1.56 Kg, 95% CI: -1.98 to -1.14) after Spirulina supplementation. Subgroup analysis based on health status revealed that weight change in obese subjects (MD: -2.06 Kg, 95% CI: -2.45 to -1.68) was greater than overweight participants (MD: -1.28 Kg, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.93) following Spirulina supplementation. Also, pooled analysis showed that Spirulina supplementation led to a significant reduction in body fat percent (MD: -1.02, 95% CI: -1.49 to -0.54) and waist circumference (MD: -1.40, 95% CI: -1.40 to -1.39), but not in body mass index and waist to hip ratio.ConclusionSpirulina supplementation significantly reduces body weight, especially in obese individuals.     

The effect of barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) on glycemic indices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ObjectiveWe performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.) supplementation on glycemic indices in adults.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science from inception up to January 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of barberry supplementation on glycemic markers including fasting blood sugar (FBS) concentrations, insulin levels, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) percentage. The results of this meta-analysis were reported, based on the random effects model.ResultsIn total, 7 studies, comprising 452 participants, were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis revealed that barberry significantly reduces insulin levels (Hedges’s: -0.67; 95% CI: -1.31 to -0.03, P = 0.04, I² = 73.3%). However, no considerable changes was observed for FBS levels (WMD: -8.06 mg/dL; 95% CI: -20.46 to 4.33, P = 0.23, I² = 96.1%), HbA1c percentage (WMD: -0.83 %; 95% CI: -2.33 to 0.67, P = 0.27, I² = 88.3%), and HOMA-IR index (WMD: -0.55; 95% CI: -1.60 to 0.50, P = 0.30, I² = 99.4%).ConclusionThe present study suggests that although barberry supplementation significantly improves insulin levels; however, other glycemic indices might not be affected. However, more high-quality RCTs with longer duration are needed to further clarify the effects of barberry on blood glucose control, especially among patients with diabetes.