Impact of Preemptive Fibrinogen Concentrate on Transfusion Requirements in Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter,Randomized, Double‐Blind,Placebo‐Controlled Trial

We hypothesized that preemptive fibrinogen administration to obtain an initial plasma level of 2.9 g/L would reduce transfusion requirements in liver transplantation. A randomized, multicenter, hemoglobin‐stratified, double‐blind, fibrinogen‐versus‐saline–controlled trial was conducted. The primary end point was the percentage of patients requiring red blood cells. We evaluated 51 patients allocated to fibrinogen and 48 allocated to saline; the primary end point was assessed using data for 92 patients because the electronic record forms were offline for three patients in the fibrinogen group and four in the saline group. We injected a median of 3.54 g fibrinogen preemptively in the fibrinogen group. Nine patients in the saline group (20.9%) required fibrinogen at graft reperfusion (compared with one patient [2.1%] in the fibrinogen group; p = 0.005). Blood was transfused to 52.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42.5–63.3%) in the fibrinogen group and 42.74% (95% CI 28.3–57.2%) in the saline group (p = 0.217). Relative risk for blood transfusion was 0.80 (95% CI 0.57–1.13). Thrombotic events occurred in one patient (2.1%) and five patients (11.4%) in the fibrinogen and saline groups, respectively. Seven patients (14.6%) in the fibrinogen group and nine (20.3%) in the saline group required reoperation. Preemptive administration of fibrinogen concentrate did not influence transfusion requirements.     

Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Heart Transplantation: A Randomized,Multicenter Trial

In an open‐label, 24‐month trial, 721 de novo heart transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg or 3.0 mg with reduced‐dose cyclosporine, or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 3 g/day with standard‐dose cyclosporine (plus corticosteroids ± induction). Primary efficacy endpoint was the 12‐month composite incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection, acute rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise, graft loss/retransplant, death or loss to follow‐up. Everolimus 1.5 mg was noninferior to MMF for this endpoint at month 12 (35.1% vs. 33.6%; difference 1.5% [97.5% CI: –7.5%, 10.6%]) and month 24. Mortality to month 3 was higher with everolimus 1.5 mg versus MMF in patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction, mainly due to infection, but 24‐month mortality was similar (everolimus 1.5 mg 10.6% [30/282], MMF 9.2% [25/271]). Everolimus 3.0 mg was terminated prematurely due to higher mortality. The mean (SD) 12‐month increase in maximal intimal thickness was 0.03 (0.05) mm with everolimus 1.5 mg versus 0.07 (0.11) mm with MMF (p < 0.001). Everolimus 1.5 mg was inferior to MMF for renal function but comparable in patients achieving predefined reduced cyclosporine trough concentrations. Nonfatal serious adverse events were more frequent with everolimus 1.5 mg versus MMF. Everolimus 1.5 mg with reduced‐dose cyclosporine offers similar efficacy to MMF with standard‐dose cyclosporine and reduces intimal proliferation at 12 months in de novo heart transplant recipients.     

Prophylactic Ureteric Stents in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Versus Late Removal

Prophylactic ureteric stenting in renal transplantation reduces major urological complications; however, morbidity is related to the indwelling duration of a stent. We aimed to determine the optimal duration for stents in this clinical setting. Patients (aged 2–75 years) from six UK hospitals who were undergoing renal transplantation were recruited and randomly assigned to either early stent removal at 5 days (without cystoscopy) or late removal at 6 weeks after transplantation (with cystoscopy). The primary outcome was a composite of stent‐related complications defined as pain, visible hematuria, migration, fragmentation, and urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 3 mo of transplantation. Between May 2010 and Nov 2013, we randomly assigned 227 participants, with 205 included in the final analysis of the primary outcome. Stent‐related complications were significantly higher in the late versus early stent removal groups (36 of 126 [28.6%] vs. 6 of 79 [7.6%]; p < 0.001). The majority of stent complications consisted of UTIs, with an incidence of 31 of 126 (24.6%) in the late group compared with 6 of 79 (7.6%) in the early group (p = 0.004). We found early stent removal on day 5 significantly reduced stent‐related complications and improved quality of life in the first 3 mo after transplantation (ISRCTN09184595).     

A 1‐Year Randomized,Double‐Blind,Placebo‐Controlled Study of Intravenous Ibandronate on Bone Loss Following Renal Transplantation

The clinical profile of ibandronate as add‐on to calcitriol and calcium was studied in this double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of 129 renal transplant recipients with early stable renal function (≤ 28 days posttransplantation, GFR ≥ 30 mL/min). Patients were randomized to receive i.v. ibandronate 3 mg or i.v. placebo every 3 months for 12 months on top of oral calcitriol 0.25 mcg/day and calcium 500 mg b.i.d. At baseline, 10 weeks and 12 months bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured. The primary endpoint, relative change in BMD for the lumbar spine from baseline to 12 months was not different, +1.5% for ibandronate versus +0.5% for placebo (p = 0.28). Ibandronate demonstrated a significant improvement of BMD in total femur, +1.3% versus ?0.5% (p = 0.01) and in the ultradistal radius, +0.6% versus ?1.9% (p = 0.039). Bone formation markers were reduced by ibandronate, whereas the bone resorption marker, NTX, was reduced in both groups. Calcium and calcitriol supplementation alone showed an excellent efficacy and safety profile, virtually maintaining BMD without any loss over 12 months after renal transplantation, whereas adding ibandronate significantly improved BMD in total femur and ultradistal radius, and also suppressed biomarkers of bone turnover. Ibandronate was also well tolerated.     

Single‐Dose,Randomized, Double‐Blind,Placebo‐Controlled Study of ACE‐011 (ActRIIA‐IgG1) in Postmenopausal Women

The effects of ACE‐011 on safety, pharmacokinetics, and bone biomarkers were evaluated in healthy, postmenopausal women. Our data indicate that ACE‐011 results in a sustained increase in biomarkers of bone formation and reduction in markers of bone resorption. The activin type IIA receptor (ActRIIA) is the high‐affinity receptor for activin. ACE‐011 is a dimeric fusion protein consisting of the extracellular domain of the human ActRIIA linked to the Fc portion of human IgG1. ACE‐011 binds to activin, preventing activin from binding endogenous receptors. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ACE‐011. Forty‐eight healthy, postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either a single dose of ACE‐011 or placebo and were followed for 4 mo. Dose levels ranged from 0.01 to 3.0 mg/kg intravenously and from 0.03 to 0.1 mg/kg subcutaneously. Safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses and the biological activity of ACE‐011, as assessed by markers of bone turnover, and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were measured. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. AEs were generally mild and transient. The PK of ACE‐011 was linear over the dose range studied, with a mean half‐life of 24–32 days. The absorption after subcutaneous dosing was essentially complete. ACE‐011 caused a rapid and sustained dose‐dependent increase in serum levels of bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase (BSALP) and a dose‐dependent decrease in C‐terminal type 1 collagen telopeptide (CTX) and TRACP‐5b levels. There was also a dose‐dependent decrease in serum FSH levels consistent with inhibition of activin. ACE‐011 is a novel agent with biological evidence of both an increase in bone formation and a decrease in bone resorption. ACE‐011 may be an effective therapy in a variety of diseases involving bone loss.     

Daclizumab Versus Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in High‐Risk Renal Transplants: Five‐Year Follow‐up of a Randomized Study

We previously reported a randomized controlled trial in which 227 de novo deceased‐donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized to rabbit antithymocyte (rATG, Thymoglobulin) or daclizumab if they were considered to be at high immunological risk, defined as high panel reactive antibodies (PRA), loss of a first kidney graft through rejection within 2 years of transplantation, or third or fourth transplantation. Patients treated with rATG had lower incidences of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) and steroid‐resistant rejection at 1 year. Patients were followed to 5 years posttransplant in an observational study; findings are described here. Treatment with rATG was associated with a lower rate of BPAR at 5 years (14.2% vs. 26.0% with daclizumab; p = 0.035). Only one rATG‐treated patient (0.9%) and one daclizumab‐treated patient (1.0%) developed BPAR after 1 year. Five‐year graft and patient survival rates, and renal function, were similar between the two groups. Overall graft survival at 5 years was significantly higher in patients without BPAR (81.0% vs. 54.8%; p < 0.001). In conclusion, rATG is superior to daclizumab for the prevention of BPAR among high‐immunological‐risk renal transplant recipients. Overall graft survival at 5 years was approximately 70% with either induction therapy, which compares favorably to low‐risk cohorts.     

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus and Mycophenolic Acid With Early Tacrolimus Withdrawal After Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

SIMCER was a 6‐mo, multicenter, open‐label trial. Selected de novo liver transplant recipients were randomized (week 4) to everolimus with low‐exposure tacrolimus discontinued by month 4 (n = 93) or to tacrolimus‐based therapy (n = 95), both with basiliximab induction and enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium with or without steroids. The primary end point, change in estimated GFR (eGFR; MDRD formula) from randomization to week 24 after transplant, was superior with everolimus (mean eGFR change +1.1 vs. ?13.3 mL/min per 1.73 m² for everolimus vs. tacrolimus, respectively; difference 14.3 [95% confidence interval 7.3–21.3]; p < 0.001). Mean eGFR at week 24 was 95.8 versus 76.0 mL/min per 1.73 m² for everolimus versus tacrolimus (p < 0.001). Treatment failure (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection [BPAR; rejection activity index score >3], graft loss, or death) from randomization to week 24 was similar (everolimus 10.0%, tacrolimus 4.3%; p = 0.134). BPAR was more frequent between randomization and month 6 with everolimus (10.0% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.026); the rate of treated BPAR was 8.9% versus 2.2% (p = 0.055). Sixteen everolimus‐treated patients (17.8%) and three tacrolimus‐treated patients (3.2%) discontinued the study drug because of adverse events. In conclusion, early introduction of everolimus at an adequate exposure level with gradual calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal after liver transplantation, supported by induction therapy and mycophenolic acid, is associated with a significant renal benefit versus CNI‐based immunosuppression but more frequent BPAR.     

Efficacy and Safety of Maribavir Dosed at 100 mg Orally Twice Daily for the Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized,Double‐Blind,Multicenter Controlled Trial

Maribavir is an oral benzimidazole riboside with potent in vitro activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV), including some CMV strains resistant to ganciclovir. In a randomized, double‐blind, multicenter trial, the efficacy and safety of prophylactic oral maribavir (100 mg twice daily) for prevention of CMV disease were compared with oral ganciclovir (1000 mg three times daily) in 303 CMV‐seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV‐seropositive donors (147 maribavir; 156 ganciclovir). Patients received study drug for up to 14 weeks and were monitored for CMV infection by blood surveillance tests and also for the development of CMV disease. The primary endpoint was Endpoint Committee (EC)‐confirmed CMV disease within 6 months of transplantation. In a modified intent‐to‐treat analysis, the noninferiority of maribavir compared to oral ganciclovir for prevention of CMV disease was not established (12% with maribavir vs. 8% with ganciclovir: event rate difference of 0.041; 95% CI: ?0.038, 0.119). Furthermore, significantly fewer ganciclovir patients had EC‐confirmed CMV disease or CMV infection by pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR compared to maribavir patients at both 100 days (20% vs. 60%; p < 0.0001) and at 6 months (53% vs. 72%; p = 0.0053) after transplantation. Graft rejection, patient survival, and non‐CMV infections were similar for maribavir and ganciclovir patients. Maribavir was well‐tolerated and associated with fewer hematological adverse events than oral ganciclovir. At a dose of 100 mg twice daily, maribavir is safe but not adequate for prevention of CMV disease in liver transplant recipients at high risk for CMV disease.     

A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Tacrolimus-Based Therapy with or without Basiliximab in Pediatric Renal Transplantation

In a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of adding basiliximab to a standard tacrolimus-based regimen in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Patients < 18 years received tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids (TAS, n = 93) or tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids/basiliximab (TAS + B, n = 99). Target tacrolimus levels were 10-20 ng/mL between days 0-21 and 5-15 ng/mL thereafter. Steroid dosing was identical in both groups. Basiliximab was administered at 10 mg (patients < 40 kg) or 20 mg (patients > or = 40 kg) within 4 h of reperfusion; the same dose was repeated on day 4. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 20.4% (TAS) and 19.2% (TAS + B); steroid-resistant acute rejection rates were 3.2% and 3.0%, respectively. Patient survival was 100%; graft survival rates were 95% in both arms. The nature and incidence of adverse events were similar in both arms except toxic nephropathy and abdominal pain, which were significantly higher in the TAS + B arm (14.1% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.03 and 11.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.02; respectively). Median serum creatinine concentrations at 6 months were 86 micromol/L in the TAS and 91 micromol/L in the TAS + B arm; glomerular filtration rate was 79.4 and 77.6 (mL/min/1.73 m2), respectively. Adding basiliximab to a tacrolimus-based regimen is safe in pediatric patients, but does not improve clinical efficacy.     

Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil De Novo After Lung Transplantation: A Prospective,Randomized, Open‐Label Trial

The role of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in de novo immunosuppression after lung transplantation is not well defined. We compared Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in an investigator‐initiated single‐center trial in Hannover, Germany. A total of 190 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 on day 28 posttransplantation to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or Everolimus combined with cyclosporine A (CsA) and steroids. Patients were followed up for 2 years. The primary endpoint was freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). The secondary endpoints were incidence of acute rejections, infections, treatment failure and kidney function. BOS‐free survival in intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis was similar in both groups (p = 0.174). The study protocol was completed by 51% of enrolled patients. The per‐protocol analysis shows incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS): 1/43 in the Everolimus group and 8/54 in the MMF group (p = 0.041). Less biopsy‐proven acute rejection (AR) (p = 0.005), cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia (p = 0.005) and lower respiratory tract infection (p = 0.003) and no leucopenia were seen in the Everolimus group. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased in both groups about 50% within 6 months. Due to a high withdrawal rate, the study was underpowered to prove a difference in BOS‐free survival. The dropout rate was more pronounced in the Everolimus group. Secondary endpoints indicate potential advantages of Everolimus‐based protocols but also a potentially higher rate of drug‐related serious adverse events.     

A Phase 1, Randomized Ascending Single‐Dose Study of Antagonist Anti‐Human CD40 ASKP1240 in Healthy Subjects

This first‐in‐human, phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of ASKP1240 in healthy subjects. Twelve sequential groups (each 6 active and 3 placebo) were randomly assigned to placebo or single ascending doses of intravenous ASKP1240 (0.00003–10 mg/kg). ASKP1240 exhibited nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with mean maximal serum concentrations and area under the serum concentration–time curves ranging from 0.7 to 251.6 μg/mL and 6.5 to 55409.6 h·μg/mL following doses 0.1 mg/kg–10 mg/kg, respectively. CD40 receptor occupancy by ASKP1240, which was dose‐dependent, reached a maximum at doses above 0.01 mg/kg. ASKP1240 was well tolerated, with no evidence of cytokine release syndrome or thromboembolic events. Treatment emergent antibodies to ASKP1240 were detected in 5/70 (7.1%) ASKP1240 recipients. In conclusion, antagonism of the CD40/CD154 interaction with ASKP1240 was safe and well tolerated at the doses tested.     

A Randomized,Double‐Blind,Placebo‐Controlled,Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Burosumab,an Anti‐FGF23 Antibody,in Adults With X‐Linked Hypophosphatemia: Week 24 Primary Analysis

In X‐linked hypophosphatemia (XLH), inherited loss‐of‐function mutations in the PHEX gene cause excess circulating levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), leading to lifelong renal phosphate wasting and hypophosphatemia. Adults with XLH present with chronic musculoskeletal pain and stiffness, short stature, lower limb deformities, fractures, and pseudofractures due to osteomalacia, accelerated osteoarthritis, dental abscesses, and enthesopathy. Burosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, binds and inhibits FGF23 to correct hypophosphatemia. This report summarizes results from a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trial of burosumab in symptomatic adults with XLH. Participants with hypophosphatemia and pain were assigned 1:1 to burosumab 1 mg/kg (n = 68) or placebo (n = 66) subcutaneously every 4 weeks (Q4W) and were comparable at baseline. Across midpoints of dosing intervals, 94.1% of burosumab‐treated participants attained mean serum phosphate concentration above the lower limit of normal compared with 7.6% of those receiving placebo (p < 0.001). Burosumab significantly reduced the Western Ontario and the McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) stiffness subscale compared with placebo (least squares [LS] mean ± standard error [SE] difference, –8.1 ± 3.24; p = 0.012). Reductions in WOMAC physical function subscale (–4.9 ± 2.48; p = 0.048) and Brief Pain Inventory worst pain (–0.5 ± 0.28; p = 0.092) did not achieve statistical significance after Hochberg multiplicity adjustment. At week 24, 43.1% (burosumab) and 7.7% (placebo) of baseline active fractures were fully healed; the odds of healed fracture in the burosumab group was 16.8‐fold greater than that in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption increased significantly from baseline with burosumab treatment compared with placebo. The safety profile of burosumab was similar to placebo. There were no treatment‐related serious adverse events or meaningful changes from baseline in serum or urine calcium, intact parathyroid hormone, or nephrocalcinosis. These data support the conclusion that burosumab is a novel therapeutic addressing an important medical need in adults with XLH.© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.