Current status of hormone therapy and breast cancer

This editorial comments on two similar reviews of the literature on breast cancer and post-menopausal hormone therapies (HTs), puts the results in clinical perspective and suggests where they direct future research and clinical management. Although epidemiological studies have suggested increased breast cancer risk for all menopausal HT regimens, unopposed oral estrogen regimens have not been associated with any increased risk in recent randomized placebo controlled trials (RCTs). Added progestogen after 5 years of combined HT in RCTs increases the risk of breast cancer by four cases per 10,000 per annum. As yet there is no evidence of different risk by progestogen type, dose or route. Theoretically local intrauterine progestogen may not give the same risk, but long-term trials are required. The commentary addresses the responsibility of the media in presenting levels of risk to the public, moving towards safer regimens, safer therapies, appropriate patient choice and, in particular, correct timing of HT where it is prescribed around menopause. This is in contrast to many of the trials when HT was administered after the potential climacteric window of therapeutic opportunity. The current main indication for HT remains for menopausal symptom control where it improves quality of life. HT may be required for many years. The informed woman should decide on HT based on her personal benefits and risks, which should include all aspects of her health.     

Benefits and risks of long-term low-dose oral continuous combined hormone therapy

OBJECTIVES: Current recommendations for hormone therapy (HT) are mainly based on findings from studies using standard dose regimens in older women who had a different health profile from those who start HT soon after the onset of menopause. METHODS: We, therefore, reviewed controlled trials assessing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of low-dose oral continuous combined HT (cc-HT) started for treatment of climacteric symptoms. This review is limited to oral cc-HT regimens over sequential regimens as most postmenopausal women prefer not to have a return of uterine bleeding, and to studies of at least 2 years in duration. RESULTS: Low-dose cc-HT is effective in alleviating climacteric symptoms and in maintaining bone density over prolonged periods, although no data were available regarding fracture risk. No increased risk of coronary heart disease, venous thrombo-embolism or stroke during the use of low-dose cc-HT was reported in the long-term studies and no definitive evidence for an increased risk of breast cancer was found. Breakthrough bleeding during the first months of use is less common than with standard dose HT and amenorrhoea is achieved in most women over time. These regimens are safe for the endometrium and are well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events compared with standard doses. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence from controlled trials indicates that low-dose oral cc-HT appears effective and safe. This makes it a good choice for the alleviation of climacteric symptoms, and for this purpose long-term administration of low-dose cc-HT does not seem to impose serious health risks. However, more long-term study data and direct head-to-head comparisons between various low-dose preparations are needed to support or rectify the safety aspects.     

Bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens for managing the burden of estrogen deficiency symptoms

The bothersome vasomotor and vaginal symptoms and bone loss that accompany the menopausal transition are associated with significant direct costs due to physician visits and medication, as well as indirect costs from reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity. With life expectancies increasing, the number of postmenopausal women is also increasing, and more women are remaining in the workforce. These factors have led to an increased burden of menopausal symptoms on healthcare systems. Hormone therapy (HT) has been shown to effectively reduce menopausal symptoms and significantly increase quality-adjusted life years in postmenopausal women, particularly in women experiencing severe symptoms. However, many women discontinue use of HT before their symptoms have dissipated due to safety and tolerability concerns. The tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) that pairs bazedoxifene (BZA) with conjugated estrogens (CE) has been developed to provide relief of menopausal symptoms and prevent bone loss without stimulating the breast or endometrium, and to have improved tolerability compared with HT. In this context, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 and 0.625 mg were shown to prevent bone loss and effectively treat menopausal symptoms in postmenopausal women with an intact uterus, while also demonstrating a favorable safety/tolerability profile. BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 and 0.625 mg were further associated with clinically significant improvements in HRQoL, sleep, and treatment satisfaction. Taken together, the reduction in menopausal symptoms, improvement in HRQoL, and favorable safety/tolerability profile associated with BZA/CE suggest that it is a cost-effective alternative to HT for managing the burden of menopausal symptoms.     

Can climacteric women self-adjust therapeutic estrogen doses using symptoms as markers ?

Objectives: To investigate if disappearance of climacteric symptoms during hormone replacement therapy (HRT) also means good therapeutic level of serum estradiol. The study group comprised of 32 postmenopausal women who had frequent climacteric symptoms. Methods: The women increased the daily treatment doses of percutaneous estradiol every 2 weeks until they felt comfortable with it. Each woman continued at that treatment dose for up to 3 months. Blood samples for estradiol assay were drawn at baseline, every time before the estradiol dosage was increased and at the end of the study. Climacteric symptoms were scored according to the Kupperman menopausal index. Results: Despite the relief of climacteric symptoms, serum estradiol concentration was at a menopausal level (<50 pg/ml) in 22% of the women. In all, 45% of the subjects showed serum estradiol remaining under 60 pg/ml, 29% of the women showed levels of 60–100 pg/ml and 26% showed serum estradiol concentration more than 100 pg/ml. Conclusions: The disappearence of climacteric symptoms during HRT does not quarantee that estrogen levels are sufficiently high for obtaining long term benefits of HRT.     

Attitudes towards the menopause and hormone therapy over the turn of the century

Objective

To assess attitudes and beliefs about the menopausal transition in a population of peri- and postmenopausal women, and if these attitudes differed before and after publication of studies on risks and benefits with hormone therapy (HT).

Materials and methods

In 1999 and 2003 all women aged 53 and 54 years in the community of Linköping, Sweden, were sent a questionnaire about use of HT, menopausal status and attitudes regarding menopause and HT.

Results

Most women regarded menopause as a natural process characterized by both hormonal deficiency and aging and these views did not differ between 1999 and 2003. A majority of women thought that significant climacteric symptoms were a good reason to use HT, but not that women without symptoms should use HT. The fraction of women who supported HT use was, however, significantly lower in 2003 than in 1999. Most women agreed that menopause leads to increased freedom and that it is a relief not to have to think about contraception and pregnancies.

Conclusions

Most Swedish women had a mainly biological view on menopause but nevertheless they thought that only women with climacteric symptoms should use HT. Women's attitudes towards HT have changed after recent reports on risks from long-term use of HT whereas the attitudes towards the menopausal transition were stable. Other factors than attitudes towards menopause affect women's actual use of HT. Probably women's and health care provider's apprehension of the risk-benefit balance of HT use is one such factor.     

Rationale for use of lower estrogen doses for postmenopausal hormone therapy

In placebo-controlled clinical trials low dose estrogens have been shown to reduce hot flashes an average of 65%. Low dosage is effective in preventing bone loss in early menopause and both low and ultralow estrogen dosages can prevent bone loss among women many years beyond menopause. Epidemiological studies indicate less risk of cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism in women who use low dose estrogens compared to standard dose. Low dosages of estrogens are less likely to produce unacceptable side effects, such as vaginal bleeding or breast tenderness. When prescribing low dosage estrogen, one can safely use less progestogen, either less daily dosage or less frequent cycles. Older women on ultralow estrogen may not require regular progestogen because the endometrium is not stimulated. In conclusion, there is a strong rationale for use of lower estrogen dosage in HT. Low dosage estrogen can relieve vasomotor symptoms and can prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Women taking low dosages of estrogens are less likely to have unacceptable side effects, such as vaginal bleeding or breast tenderness. Moreover, the potential harm caused by standard dosages of estrogen with progestin, including coronary heart disease, venous thromboembolism, stroke, and breast cancer may be mitigated by use of lower estrogen doses that do not require daily or monthly progestin opposition.     

EMAS position statement: Managing the menopause in the context of coronary heart disease

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke is the most common cause of female death. Premenopausal CHD is very rare but when women enter the menopause the incidence of CHD increases markedly. CHD presents 10 years later in women than in men. The reason is still unclear but the protective effects of estrogens have been suggested.

Aims

To formulate a position statement on the management of menopause women in the context of coronary heart disease.

Materials and methods

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

Results and conclusions

Based on long term randomized placebo-controlled studies hormone therapy (HT) is not recommended for the primary or secondary prevention of CHD in postmenopausal women. In most countries the only indication for HT is the treatment of menopausal symptoms. Women with known CHD or with many coronary risk factors seeking HT because of troublesome climacteric symptoms should be evaluated for their individual baseline risk of developing breast cancer, venous thromboembolism and CHD recurrence. The same applies to non hormone therapy-based treatments where long term clinical studies are lacking. Risks should be weighed against expected benefit from symptom relief and improved quality of life. The lowest effective estrogen dose should be used during the shortest possible time. Transdermal administration is preferred if risk factors for VTE exist. Different progestogens might differ in their cardiovascular effects. Observational studies suggest that micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone may have a better risk profile than other progestogens with regard to thrombotic risk.     

Hormone replacement therapy: the benefits in tailoring the regimen and dose

Despite the clear benefits of long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT), the majority of patients tend to undergo short-term treatment. The cyclical bleedings induced by the sequential progestogen administration are often unacceptable namely in the elderly postmenopausal women. At the standard doses HRT preparations can also induce annoying hormone-related side effects, both in sequential and continuous combined regimens. Lower HRT schedules are reported to be highly effective in the relief of climacteric symptoms, inducing minimal endometrial stimulation with high rates of amenorrhea. Continuous administration of low doses of progestins is safe for endometrium protection and minimizes progestin-related side effects. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that low dose HRT can prevent the increase in bone turnover and the consequent bone loss in postmenopausal women. The choice of lower HRT dosages can also be useful for the number of potential disadvantages of standard HRT doses, mainly for long-term treatments. Low dose regimens should be considered as a starting dose to minimize the occurrence of side effects, improving compliance and, therefore, HRT effects on the prevention of long-term consequences of estrogen deprivation.     

When is it appropriate to prescribe postmenopausal hormone therapy?

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence and consensus-based recommendations for the use of hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: Using evidence from clinical trials and other publications, a multidisciplinary group of women's health experts developed consensus-based recommendations for HT use in more than 300 clinical scenarios. These panelists utilized the RAND Appropriateness Method and a quantitative scale to rate the appropriateness of treatment options for women with various risk factors and clinical scenarios. RESULTS: The panel judged it appropriate to prescribe all forms of HT to women with intolerable menopause symptoms and usual (age-expected) risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD), venous thromboembolism (VTE), or stroke. Use of HT was judged not appropriate for the clinical scenarios of bone preservation, cosmetic appearance, current memory loss, loss of libido, or CVD protection. For a woman still using HT after 5 or more years, it was considered appropriate to recommend the options of stopping or lowering the dose even if stopping was previously attempted. In treating intolerable symptoms in the presence of some elevated risk for diseases related to HT, route of administration may affect appropriateness but prior stroke or TIA# is a contraindication. CONCLUSIONS: Standard HT is appropriate for women with intolerable menopause symptoms in the absence of HT-related risk factors (eg, CVD, stroke, VTE, breast cancer). Panelists judged it appropriate to repeatedly present the option of stopping or reducing the dose. In most cases, presence of risk factors makes standard-dose oral HT not appropriate; however, some women may be candidates for a different dose or route of administration.     

Progestogens in postmenopausal hormone therapy and the risk of breast cancer

Hormone therapy is the treatment of choice for the alleviation of menopausal symptoms and the treatment of urogenital atrophy. In women with an intact uterus a progestogen must be added to estrogen therapy to prevent endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. There is a wide variety of marketed progestogens which differ in their pharmacological properties according to their structure. Convincing evidence from both clinical trials and epidemiological studies indicates that combined estrogen–progestogen therapy confers a higher risk of breast cancer compared to estrogen monotherapy. Concerning the different types of progestogens, data from large observational studies suggest that natural progesterone and dydrogesterone are associated with a lower risk of breast cancer compared with the other progestins. Observational studies, furthermore, indicate that sequential estrogen–progestogen regimens may lead to a lower risk elevation compared to continuous regimens. The effect of tibolone on breast cancer is unclear. Concluding, both the type of the progestogen and the mode of HT administration may have an impact on breast cancer risk.     

The effect of tibolone versus 17beta-estradiol on climacteric symptoms in women with surgical menopause: a randomized, cross-over study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of tibolone and 17beta-estradiol on climacteric symptoms, in a randomized, single-blind, cross-over study in surgically menopausal women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty surgically menopausal women were divided randomly into two groups. Group A received treatment with tibolone for 6 months, while group B received 17beta-estradiol. After 3 weeks washout period, treatment protocols were exchanged for another 6 months. The climacteric symptoms were assessed with Greene Climacteric Scale at baseline, during washout and after the treatments. Statistical analysis was done with the Wilcoxon's Sign Rank test. RESULTS: Both treatments significantly improved the scores of all subscales with respect to baseline. However, the improvement in psychological, somatic and sexual subscales were significantly superior in the tibolone group compared with 17beta-estradiol group. Both treatments showed comparable improvements in the relief of vasomotor symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that tibolone may improve mood, libido and somatic symptoms in surgically menopausal women to a greater extent than estrogen therapy alone.     

Efficacy and safety of oral estriol for managing postmenopausal symptoms

OBJECTIVE: to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of oral estriol for the treatment of climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal women. METHODS: 68 postmenopausal women with climacteric symptoms received oral estriol, 2 mg/day, daily for 12 months. We evaluated the degree of climacteric complaints with estriol therapy; serum levels of gonadotropins, estradiol (E2) and lipids; biochemical markers of bone metabolism; blood pressure; and side effects both at baseline and during treatment. Climacteric symptoms were assessed according to the menopausal index (MI), a version of the Kupperman index that had been modified for Japanese women. RESULTS: oral estriol therapy significantly reduced total MI scores. The greatest relief was noted for hot flushes, night sweats, and insomnia. Estriol treatment significantly lowered serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations but did not affect any of the other parameters (lipids, bone, liver and blood pressure) during the study period. Slightly vaginal bleeding occurred in 14.3% of those who underwent natural menopausal women. Histologic evaluation of the endometrium and ultrasound assessment of the breasts following 12 months of estriol treatment found normal results in all women. CONCLUSION: Estriol is a safe and effective alternative for relieving climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal Japanese women.     

Postmenopausal hormone therapy: new questions and the case for new clinical trials

Observational studies suggest that postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) prevents coronary heart disease, whereas randomized clinical trials have not confirmed a cardioprotective effect. Although observational studies may have overestimated the coronary benefit conferred by postmenopausal hormone use, there are other plausible explanations for the apparent discrepancy between previous results and the less favorable findings from clinical trials such as the large Women's Health Initiative. There is now a critical mass of data to support the hypothesis that age or time since menopause may importantly influence the benefit-risk ratio associated with HT, especially with respect to cardiovascular outcomes, and that the method of administration, dose, and formulation of exogenous hormones may also be relevant. Although the weight of the evidence indicates that older women and those with subclinical or overt coronary heart disease should not take HT, estrogen remains the most effective treatment currently available for vasomotor symptoms, and its effects on the development of coronary disease in newly postmenopausal women remain unclear. Moreover, effects of HT on quality of life and cognitive function in recently postmenopausal women merit further study. These unresolved clinical issues provide the rationale for the design of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study, a 5-year randomized trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose oral estrogen and transdermal estradiol in preventing progression of atherosclerosis in recently postmenopausal women.     

Multiple clinically relevant hormone therapy regimens fail to improve cognitive function in aged ovariectomized rhesus monkeys

Preclinical studies in aged, surgically-menopausal rhesus monkeys have revealed powerful benefits of intermittent estrogen injections on prefrontal cortex–dependent working memory, together with corresponding effects on dendritic spine morphology in the prefrontal cortex. This contrasts with the inconsistent effects of hormone therapy (HT) reported in clinical studies in women. Factors contributing to this discrepancy could include differences in the formulation and sequence of HT regimens, resulting in different neurobiological outcomes. The current study evaluated, in aging surgically menopausal rhesus monkeys, the cognitive effects of 4 HT regimens modeled directly on human clinical practice, including continuous estrogen treatment opposed by progesterone. None of the regimens tested produced any cognitive effect, despite yielding physiologically relevant serum hormone levels, as intended. These findings have implications for the design of regimens that might optimize the benefits of hormone treatment for healthy aging, and suggest that common HT protocols used by women may fail to result in substantial cognitive benefit, at least via direct effects on the prefrontal cortex.     

Critical evaluation of the safety of Cimicifuga racemosa in menopause symptom relief

OBJECTIVE: This comprehensive review examines the safety of Cimicifuga racemosa for the treatment of menopause symptoms, particularly in populations in which conventional menopause treatment regimens, including estrogen replacement, are contraindicated. DESIGN: An extensive database of information on Cimicifuga, which included all published literature pertaining to preclinical and clinical safety of various forms of Cimicifuga, the FDA and World Health Organization adverse-event reporting systems, monographs, compendia, internal unpublished data from a major manufacturer, foreign literature, and historical anecdotal reports, was reviewed, and findings pertaining to the safety of Cimicifuga use for menopause treatment were reported. RESULTS: Uncontrolled reports, postmarketing surveillance, and human clinical trials of more than 2,800 patients demonstrate a low incidence of adverse events (5.4%). Of the reported adverse events, 97% were minor and did not result in discontinuation of therapy, and the only severe events were not attributed to Cimicifuga treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although the effects of Cimicifuga may be dependent on the specific extract preparation, this review clearly supports the safety of specific Cimicifuga extracts, particularly isopropanolic preparations, for use in women experiencing menopausal symptoms and as a safe alternative for women in whom estrogen therapy is contraindicated.     

Duration not severity of the climacteric syndrome predicts resumption of hormone therapy after discontinuation: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Predictive factors of women who are unable to quit prolonged hormonal therapy (HT) are largely unknown. We sought to identify predictors for the resumption of HT after the discontinuation of treatment. METHODS: A cohort prospective study was conducted allocating menopausal women treated with HT for over 3 years. Menopausal symptoms were monitored periodically after HT cessation by the Greene climacteric scale. RESULTS: Eighty-two women participated in the study. Age, the age of menopause, BMI, HT duration, the type of regimen, reasons cited to discontinue HT and the method of discontinuation did not differ between the subjects who successfully discontinued HT and those who failed to quit HT. Only the prevalence of vasomotor symptoms when HT was first prescribed significantly differed between the groups (P = 0.03). Comparable maximal Greene score was recorded in both groups. Over time, the subjects who returned to HT had higher Greene score [Hazard ratio 1.25, confidence interval (CI) 95% (1-1.07)] and significantly higher vasomotor score [Hazard score 1.22, CI 95% (1.02-1.46)]. CONCLUSIONS: The history of hot flashes and the duration of menopausal symptoms upon HT discontinuation predict the resumption of HT. Thus, the return to HT is expected in individuals who are intolerant of prolonged climacteric syndrome.     

Important factors for use of hormone replacement therapy: a population-based study of Swedish women. The Women's Health in Lund Area (WHILA) Study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to delineate the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among women who were born between December 2, 1935, and December 1, 1945, and living in the Lund area of southern Sweden and to analyze factors that contribute to the acceptance and continuation of HRT. METHODS: All women received a generic questionnaire pertaining to demographic background, lifestyle, health behavior, and climacteric symptoms and underwent a personal interview. An interim analysis was carried out on 3,900 women. We mailed a hormone questionnaire to the women who were using HRT (n = 1,875). This hormone questionnaire covered, for example, menopausal status, complaints, and alterations in and efficacy of HRT use, as well as the reasons for discontinuing HRT use. RESULTS: A total of 1,415 (76%) women answered the hormone questionnaire. Forty-eight percent were HRT ever users, and 32% were current users. Mean duration of HRT use was 47 months. The most common incentives for HRT use were alleviation of menopausal symptoms (72%) and prevention of bone loss (50%) and/or cardiovascular disease (31%). Forty-seven percent of HRT users reported that they had changed regimens at least once. HRT users had higher education, full-time work, and a higher consumption of alcohol but less consumption of cigarettes. They reported higher frequencies of climacteric symptoms, past histories of premenstrual syndrome, use of oral contraceptives, and hysterectomy. They also had a higher consumption of healthcare resources. A total of 177 women withdrew from therapy. The most common reasons for discontinuation of HRT were weight gain, anxiety of cancer, bleeding, breast tenderness, and emotional problems. Compared with current users, past users had less positive as well as fewer negative effects of HRT. Several variables contributed to compliance, including education, full-time work, regular exercise, low frequency of persistent climacteric symptoms, and alteration of regimens. CONCLUSION: Education, working conditions, lifestyle, interest in prevention, and severity of the climacteric symptoms are determinants for both acceptance of and compliance with HRT.     

Differential effects of estrogen-androgen and estrogen-only therapy on vasomotor symptoms, gonadotropin secretion, and endogenous androgen bioavailability in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate somatic symptom relief, gonadotropin secretion, and endogenous androgen bioavailability (protein-bound and free) during 3 months of estrogen-androgen therapy or matched estrogen-only replacement therapy. DESIGN: Ninety-three naturally menopausal outpatients with 6 or more months of amenorrhea, who were experiencing mild-to-moderate vasomotor symptoms, were randomized to receive one of five treatments: oral esterified estrogens (0.625 mg or 1.25 mg), oral esterified estrogens combined with methyltestosterone (0.625 mg combined with 1.25 mg methyltestosterone or esterified estrogens 1.25 mg combined with 2.5 mg methyltestosterone), or placebo for 12 weeks. All treatments were preceded by a 4-week placebo lead-in period. RESULTS: Patients receiving the lower dose of estrogen-androgen therapy had fewer somatic menopausal symptoms than patients receiving the lower dose estrogen (0.625 mg), and they experienced somatic symptom relief similar to those patients receiving the higher dose of estrogen (1.25 mg). Significantly greater luteinizing hormone suppression (p < or = 0.03) occurred in estrogen-androgen groups compared to estrogen groups, suggesting that added androgen might mediate a more pronounced negative feedback on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Sex hormone-binding globulin increased significantly in both estrogen-treated groups (p < or = 0.01), whereas decreases occurred in both estrogen-androgen groups (p < or = 0.006). The higher dose estrogen-only preparation significantly reduced androstenedione (p < or = 0.01) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (p < or = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The extent of relief with lower dose estrogen-androgen therapy was similar to higher dose estrogen-only treatment. The greater efficacy of combination therapy on somatic symptoms could be mediated by the same mechanism responsible for the suppressive effects of estrogen-androgen therapy on luteinizing hormone secretion. The marked differences in circulating levels of sex hormone building globulin, which were increased by estrogen and decreased by estrogen-androgen, and the resulting impact on bioavailable androgens and estrogens could also explain the differential somatic relief with both treatments. Endogenous adrenal androgens were lower in women treated with esterified estrogens 1.25 mg/day, suggesting that estrogen therapy can produce a significant hypoandrogenic state by inhibiting production or accelerating clearance of adrenal androgens.     

Rationale for using raloxifene to prevent both osteoporosis and breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Both osteoporosis with fracture and breast cancer are important health issues for postmenopausal women. It is well known that estrogen and estrogen receptors (ERs) play an important role in the pathogenesis of both diseases. In past decades, hormone therapy (HT), mainly estrogen plus progestin (EPT), has been frequently used for the purpose of preventing and treating postmenopausal osteoporosis because of its efficacy, but it also contributes to a significant increase in breast cancer. Currently, there is a dilemma regarding the use of estrogen for postmenopausal women. Fortunately, an increasing understanding of the action of estrogen has led ultimately to the design of new drugs that work by virtue of their interaction with the ER; these drugs have come to be known as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and are not only effective in preventing osteoporosis and managing those with osteoporosis, but also in decreasing the incidence of breast cancer. Among these SERMs, raloxifene may be the most attractive agent based on the evidence from five recent large trials (Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation [MORE], Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista [CORE], Raloxifene Use for the Heart [RUTH], Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene [STAR], and Evista Versus Alendronate [EVA]). The former three trials showed that raloxifene not only decreases the incidence of osteoporosis-associated fractures, but also has efficacy in breast cancer prevention. The head-to-head comparison with the anti-fracture agent alendronate (EVA trial) and the chemoprevention agent tamoxifen (STAR trial) further confirmed that raloxifene is a better choice. We concluded that since there is an absence of a therapeutic effect on relieving climacteric symptoms and there is the presence of a potential risk of thromboembolism in the use of raloxifene, this drug can be prescribed for clear indications, such as the management of osteoporosis, the prevention of fracture, and decreasing the incidence of invasive breast cancer, with careful monitoring for thromboembolism. It is reasonable to use raloxifene as an appropriate medicine that targets climacteric symptom-free postmenopausal women because of its overall favorable risk-benefit safety profile using the global index proposed by the Women's Health Initiation (WHI).