Minoxidil does not possess androgenic activity

Minoxidil is a potent antihypertensive vasodilator. One of the side effects of minoxidil is hirsutism. Therefore the hypothesis was tested whether minoxidil has androgenic effects. The weights of seminal mice vesicles, organs with a high sensitivity to androgens, are widely used as a sensitive bioassay for testing androgenic activity. Our results demonstrated that minoxidil in relatively high doses did not produce any significant changes in the weight of seminal vesicles of castrated mice. We conclude that minoxidil in this experimental model does not have any androgenic properties.     

Fatal Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Associated with Minoxidil

Minoxidil is a direct-acting peripheral vasodilator for the treatment of symptomatic hypertension, or refractory hypertension associated with target organ damage, that is not manageable with a diuretic and two other antihypertensive drugs. The most frequent adverse events associated with minoxidil include hypertrichosis and cardiovascular events related to its powerful antihypertensive effect, and less frequently, rashes, bullous eruptions, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS). Evidence suggests that SJS and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are variants of a single disease with common causes and mechanisms, but differing severities. Epidermal detachment is mild in SJS, moderate in overlap SJS-TEN, and severe (> 30% of body surface area) in TEN. We describe a case of minoxidil-associated SJS that evolved into fatal TEN. A 69-year-old African-American woman with a history of chronic kidney disease was admitted to the hospital for a cerebrovascular accident and uncontrolled hypertension. On hospital day 12, oral minoxidil was added to her drug regimen. On day 23, she developed a maculopapular rash on her face that gradually diffused to her chest and back. Vesicles and papular lesions extended to her extremities and mucosal membranes; results of a skin biopsy revealed SJS. A positive Nikolsky's sign (blisters spread on application of pressure) was detected. On days 27–31, diffuse bullae developed with rash exacerbation. Skin detachment exceeded 30% and was consistent with TEN. The patient died on day 39. An evaluation of the causality and time course suggested that minoxidil was the most likely culpable drug, with a Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale score indicating that the likelihood of the association was possible (score of 3). The mechanism of this reaction has not been well elucidated. It may be related to an impaired clearance of the minoxidil metabolite, or an immune stimulation resulting in apoptosis and epidermis destruction. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of fatal TEN associated with minoxidil. This case report emphasizes the importance of monitoring for serious dermatologic reactions in patients receiving minoxidil therapy.     

Topical minoxidil therapy for hair regrowth

The pathogenesis of hair loss, the postulated mechanisms of minoxidil action on hair growth, and clinical trials, adverse reactions, experimental formulations, and percutaneous absorption of topical minoxidil preparations are reviewed. Topical minoxidil seems to normalize hair follicles and increase blood flow to the scalp. In clinical trials of various formulations, results have varied. Improved hair growth occurred after four to six months of therapy; twice-daily application seems to be indicated. The most frequently reported adverse reactions are mild scalp dryness and irritation and, rarely, allergic contact dermatitis. Current recommendations are to reserve topical minoxidil for patients with normal cardiovascular status and to routinely monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and electrocardiographic changes. A new drug application is pending with FDA for use of topical minoxidil in androgenetic alopecia (male-pattern baldness), which is genetically determined and apparently stimulated by androgens. For alopecia areata, which involves hair loss on the body or scalp, usually patchy and of sudden onset, no reliable treatment has been found, although minoxidil may be efficacious in some patients. Minoxidil has generated new interest in hair-loss research. The etiology of hair loss must be better understood before more effective treatment regimens can be designed.     

Minoxidil opens mitochondrial K(ATP) channels and confers cardioprotection

1. ATP-sensitive potassium channel in the mitochondrial inner membrane (mitoK(ATP) channel) rather than in the sarcolemma (sarcK(ATP) channel) appears to play an important role in cardioprotection. We examined the effect of minoxidil, a potent antihypertensive agent and hair growth stimulator, on sarcK(ATP) and mitoK(ATP) channels in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. 2. Minoxidil activated a glybenclamide-sensitive sarcK(ATP) channel current in the whole-cell recording mode with an EC(50) of 182.6 microm. Minoxidil reversibly increased the flavoprotein oxidation, an index of mitoK(ATP) channel activity, in a concentration-dependent manner. The EC(50) for mitoK(ATP) channel activation was estimated to be 7.3 microm; this value was notably approximately 25-fold lower than that for sarcK(ATP) channel activation. 3. Minoxidil (10 microm) significantly attenuated the ouabain-induced increase of mitochondrial Ca(2+) concentration, which was measured by loading cells with rhod-2 fluorescence. Furthermore, pretreatment with minoxidil (10 microm) before 20-min no-flow ischaemia significantly improved the recovery of developed tension measured after 60 min of reperfusion in coronary perfused guinea-pig ventricular muscles. These cardioprotective effects of minoxidil were completely abolished by the mitoK(ATP) channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate (500 microm). 4. Our results indicate that minoxidil exerts a direct cardioprotective effect on heart muscle cells, an effect mediated by the selective activation of mitoK(ATP) channels.     

Long-term clinical effects, bioavailability, and kinetics of minoxidil in relation to renal function.

Minoxidil was used to treat 26 patients (17 to 67 years old) with severe hypertension and varying degrees of renal function. Our object was to assess long-term clinical efficacy, kinetics (acute and chronic), and bioavailability of minoxidil in chronic renal insufficiency. Minoxidil, 27 to 30 mg per day, decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure during the first three months of therapy. Between the third and 24th months (30 months in one patient) there was no further change. Propranolol or clonidine was needed to control heart rate, and furosemide or dialysis was needed to control edema induced by minoxidil. Renal function improved in some of the mildy azotemic patients. Minoxidil kinetics after the customary dose did not differ whether the drug was taken as tablet or solution. Kinetic parameters during chronic administration of minoxidil did not differ from those after acute administration. The kinetics in chronic renal insufficiency do not differ from these in subjects with normal renal function.     

Preparation and in vivo evaluation of lecithin-based microparticles for topical delivery of minoxidil

Minoxidil is widely used for treatment of androgenic alopecia. Commercial products containing minoxidil are usually in solution form. Repeated applications of minoxidil solution can lead to adverse effects such as skin irritation and horniness. The aims of this study were to prepare lecithin-based microparticle in minoxidil solution for enhancement of minoxidil topical delivery and skin protection and evaluate the ability of lecithin on in vitro delivery, in vivo hair growth, and skin trouble improvement compared to commercial minoxidil solution. In in vitro skin permeation study, minoxidil solution containing lecithin microparticle showed higher skin penetration rate and higher retention of drug inside the skin compared to minoxidil solution without lecithin. After topical application of minoxidil solutions with or without lecithin to C57BL/6 mice, minoxidil 5% solution containing lecithin microparticle showed hair re-growth as efficient as commercial product of minoxidil 5% solution. It also significantly improved skin troubles while commercial product presented horny substance and crust formation. Therefore, the lecithin-based microparticle in minoxidil 5% solution has good ability to promote hair growth without adverse effects.     

Amlodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.

Amlodipine, a basic dihydropyridine derivative, inhibits the calcium influx through 'slow' channels in peripheral vascular and coronary smooth muscle cells, thus producing marked vasodilation in peripheral and coronary vascular beds. Short to medium term clinical trials indicate that amlodipine is effective as both an antianginal agent in patients with stable angina pectoris and an antihypertensive agent in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In small comparative studies amlodipine was at least as effective as 'standard' agents, including atenolol, verapamil, hydrochlorothiazide or captopril in hypertension, and diltiazem or nadolol in angina pectoris. Amlodipine is well tolerated, and does not appear to cause some of the undesirable effects often associated with other cardiovascular agents (e.g. adverse changes in serum lipid patterns, cardiac conduction disturbances, postural hypotension). The most common adverse effects associated with amlodipine therapy--oedema and flushing--are related to the vasodilatory action of the drug, and are generally mild to moderate in severity. Thus, amlodipine seems to provide a useful alternative to other agents currently available for the treatment of essential hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris, with certain pharmacodynamic and tolerability properties that should be advantageous in many patients.     

Candesartan cilexetil: an update of its use in essential hypertension

Candesartan cilexetil is converted to the angiotensin II receptor antagonist candesartan during absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. The selective and competitive binding of candesartan to the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor prevents binding of angiotensin II, a key mediator in the renin-angiotensin system. Significant reductions in systolic BP and diastolic BP are achieved with a once-daily dosage of candesartan cilexetil 2 to 32 mg/day in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In randomised studies, candesartan cilexetil 8 to 16 mg/day was at least as effective as therapeutic dosages of losartan or other angiotensin II receptor antagonists. At a dosage of up to 32 mg/day candesartan cilexetil demonstrated greater antihypertensive efficacy than losartan 50 or 100 mg/day. In comparative trials, candesartan cilexetil demonstrated similar or greater antihypertensive efficacy compared with enalapril or hydrochlorothiazide and equivalent efficacy compared with amlodipine. The efficacy of candesartan cilexetil is not affected by age, and the drug provided significant BP reductions in Black patients and in those with severe hypertension. Long-term clinical studies to assess the effects of treatment with candesartan cilexetil on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are ongoing. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy has been seen with candesartan cilexetil treatment in patients with hypertension. Furthermore, the drug has favourable effects on renal function in patients with hypertension with or without coexisting diabetes mellitus. Renal vascular resistance and albumin excretion were reduced following treatment with candesartan cilexetil. Glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism were not affected by treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Candesartan cilexetil is well tolerated and is not associated with cough, a common adverse effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment. A pooled analysis of clinical trials found that the tolerability profile of candesartan cilexetil is not significantly different from that of placebo. Adverse events are not dose-related and are generally of mild to moderate severity. Conclusions: Candesartan cilexetil is an effective antihypertensive agent with a tolerability profile similar to that of placebo. Comparative data indicate that candesartan cilexetil has antihypertensive efficacy equivalent to that of other major classes of antihypertensive agents and has a long duration of action. Therefore, candesartan cilexetil is a useful therapeutic option in the management of patients with hypertension.     

Monilethrix treated with minoxidil

In literature many different therapies are proposed to treat Monilethrix, but a definitive therapy still doe not exist. We decided to treat four patients affected by Monilethrix, with topical minoxidil 2%, 1 ml night and day for 1 year. Minoxidil led to a an increase of normal hair shaft without any side effects in all the patients. Therefore topical minoxidil 2% could be considered a good therapy to treat Monilethrix.     

Verapamil. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension

Although verapamil is a well-established treatment for angina, cardiac arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies, this review reflects current interest in calcium antagonists as anti-hypertensive agents by focusing on the role of verapamil in hypertension. Verapamil is a phenylalkylamine derivative which antagonises calcium influx through the slow channels of vascular smooth muscle and cardiac cell membranes. By reducing intracellular free calcium concentrations, verapamil causes coronary and peripheral vasodilation and depresses myocardial contractility and electrical activity in the atrioventricular and sinoatrial nodes. Verapamil is well suited for the management of essential hypertension since it produces generalised systemic vasodilation resulting in a marked reduction in systemic vascular resistance and, consequently, blood pressure. Evidence from clinical studies supports the role of oral verapamil as an effective and well-tolerated first-line treatment for the management of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Clinical studies have shown that verapamil is more effective the higher the pretreatment blood pressure and some authors have found a more pronounced antihypertensive effect in older patients or in patients with low plasma renin activity. Sustained release verapamil formulations are available for oral administration which, as a single daily dose, are as effective in lowering blood pressure over 24 hours as equivalent doses of conventional verapamil formulations given 3 times daily. As a first-line antihypertensive agent, oral verapamil is equivalent to several other calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and other vasodilators, and is not associated with many of the common adverse effects of these treatments. Verapamil may be preferred as an alternative first-line antihypertensive treatment to diuretics in elderly patients because it has similar efficacy in these patients without causing the adverse effects commonly linked with diuretic treatment. Furthermore, because verapamil does not cause bronchoconstriction, it may be used in preference to beta-blockers in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive airway disease. Reflex tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension or development of tolerance is not evident following verapamil administration. As a second- or third-line treatment for patients refractory to established antihypertensive regimens, verapamil produces marked blood pressure reductions when combined with diuretics and/or ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers and vasodilators such as prazosin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Pinacidil. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypertension

Pinacidil is an orally administered antihypertensive drug that acts via direct relaxation of vascular smooth muscle to produce peripheral vasodilatation and a reduction in blood pressure without significant direct effects on cardiac electrophysiology. Pinacidil is unrelated to other antihypertensive drugs in clinical use, either in structure or mechanism of action. It belongs to a new class of agents called 'potassium channel openers' which act via potassium efflux to hyperpolarize cell membranes, indirectly causing a net reduction in intracellular calcium that leads to relaxation of vascular smooth muscle. Pinacidil is indicated in the management of essential hypertension. In clinical trials of up to 1 year duration, pinacidil administered twice daily in a controlled release capsule formulation has been shown to achieve adequate blood pressure control both in previously untreated patients and in those with blood pressure inadequately controlled by beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs or thiazide diuretics. In long term (up to 1 year) comparative studies pinacidil was at least as effective as hydralazine, prazosin or nifedipine in maintaining blood pressure control. Pinacidil may also have a potential use in the treatment of patients with secondary renal hypertension. Clinical trials to date have usually allowed the addition of a thiazide diuretic and/or beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug to enhance the efficacy of pinacidil and/or to reduce the incidence of adverse effects. The main adverse effects of pinacidil treatment, which result from its peripheral vasodilator activity, are headache, oedema, palpitations and tachycardia. Although the overall incidence of adverse effects is quite high, they are usually mild, transient in nature and respond to a reduction in dose. Nevertheless, these effects may occasionally be severe, necessitating withdrawal from therapy. Thus, pinacidil is an effective antihypertensive drug for the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Despite its novel mechanism of action pinacidil causes adverse effects typical of peripheral vasodilators; during long term use with twice daily administration of the controlled release capsule formulation, the addition of a diuretic is often necessary to attenuate peripheral oedema and maintain adequate control of blood pressure. Further long term controlled trials are needed to determine the precise role of pinacidil relative to that of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium channel blocking drugs.     

Nongenotoxicity of minoxidil in murine hair follicles as determined by the nuclear aberration assay

A 1-cm2 area on the back of CD1 mice was prepared for topical application of minoxidil, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU), or cyclophosphamide (CY) by clipping or plucking hair from a patch of skin. Plucking stimulates hair follicle cell division while clipping does not. Minoxidil was topically administered for 8 consecutive days. CY or MNU was administered topically once on the eighth day postplucking. The incidence of nuclear aberrations and mitotic figures were measured in hair follicles while frequency of micronuclei and the ratio of RBC/PCE were measured in the bone marrow. Results with minoxidil showed no increase in either nuclear aberrations in the hair follicle or micronuclei in the bone marrow. These results suggest that topically applied minoxidil is not genotoxic. In contrast, a dose-dependent effect of MNU on the incidence of nuclear aberrations in the hair follicle was seen. CY induced a dose-dependent increase in the incidence of micronuclei in the bone marrow and in nuclear aberrations in the hair follicle after topical application. Minoxidil applied to clipped mice significantly increased the incidence of mitotic figures above that seen in both the clipped and plucked controls. This suggests that minoxidil is a mitogenic agent in the hair follicle. These findings are consistent with the success of topically applied minoxidil in the treatment of alopecia areata.     

Felodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension

Felodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist which selectively relaxes vascular smooth muscle. By acting at peripheral arterioles, it lowers systemic vascular resistance and thereby produces substantial decreases in blood pressure and increases in cardiac output. Felodipine is indicated for the management of hypertension, and in patients with mild to moderate disease felodipine monotherapy markedly lowers blood pressure. It proved as effective as atenolol, and equivalent to hydrochlorothiazide, either with or without amiloride, in terms of antihypertensive activity. Comparative studies also demonstrated that once daily administration with an extended-release formulation provides equivalent antihypertensive efficacy to the same amount of drug administered twice daily as the standard tablets. As a second- or third-line treatment for patients with moderate to severe hypertension refractory to standard drug combinations, felodipine produced considerable reductions in blood pressure when added to beta-blockers and diuretics, either alone or in combination, in studies lasting up to 48 weeks. In comparative studies of multiple-drug treatments felodipine was found to have superior efficacy to hydralazine and prazosin, and was at least as effective as nifedipine, minoxidil and propranolol, when used with diuretics and/or beta-blockers. As an alternative to hydrochlorothiazide, in combination with beta-blockers, felodipine consistently controlled blood pressure in a greater percentage of patients and usually provided greater decreases in blood pressure. The main side effects with felodipine are ankle oedema, headache and flushing. Although the overall incidence of effects is quite high, they are usually mild in nature. Nevertheless, withdrawal due to side effects has been necessary in about 7% of patients overall. Thus, the efficacy of felodipine has been demonstrated in mild, moderate and severe hypertension. At the present time it seems particularly suitable as a second- or third-line treatment in refractory hypertension, but it also can be used as monotherapy for mild to moderate disease.     

Examination of minoxidil-induced acute cardiotoxicity in miniature swine

Minoxidil, a vasodilating antihypertensive agent, was given orally in doses of 1, 3 or 10 mg/kg to miniature swine on 2 consecutive days. Mean arterial pressure decreased and heart rate increased most consistently after the 10 mg/kg dose. However, all 3 doses of minoxidil induced myocardial hemorrhages and/or left ventricular papillary muscle necrosis within 24 h after the second dose. Necrosis, characterized by hypercontraction of muscle cells and myofibrillar damage, occurred in 1 of 8 pigs given 1 mg/kg, 3 of 13 given 3 mg/kg and 7 of 14 given 10 mg/kg of minoxidil. The pharmacological effects of minoxidil, hypotension and reflex tachycardia, probably led to ischemia and necrosis in left ventricular papillary muscles. Gross hemorrhages involving the left atrium and to a lesser extent the left ventricle were found in 4 of 8 pigs given 1 mg/kg, 9 of 13 given 3 mg/kg and 11 of 14 given 10 mg/kg of minoxidil. The atrial lesions were manifested grossly by diffuse redness and microscopically by interstitial edema, extravasation of erythrocytes and infiltration of areas around small arteries and arterioles with acute and chronic inflammatory cells. The hemmorhagic areas were concentrated along the epicardial surfaces, and to a lesser extent along the endocardial surfaces. Atrial lesions induced by minoxidil preferentially involve the left atrium in pigs and the right atrium in dogs. These differences may be related to the anatomic patterns of coronary circulation in the 2 species.     

苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压40例临床疗效

目的：观察苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压的临床降压效果及不良反应。方法：40例门诊原发性高血压病人选用苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平治疗,2．5mg／d口服,1次／d,疗程8周。结果：治疗第2周和第8周总有效率分别为85．0和95．0％,不良反应发生率7．5％。结论：苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平降压效果良好,平稳,不良反应少。     

Eprosartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension

The angiotensin II receptor antagonist eprosartan is approved for the treatment of essential hypertension and may be administered using a convenient once-daily regimen. The drug is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent with benefit in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular events, independent of blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects. Eprosartan has a low potential for serious adverse events and has not been associated with clinically significant drug interactions, establishing it as a promising agent for combination antihypertensive strategies. Unlike ACE inhibitors such as enalapril, eprosartan does not have a tendency to cause persistent nonproductive cough. Accordingly, eprosartan represents a useful therapeutic option in the management of patients with hypertension, including those who have had a stroke and those with co-morbid type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Lisinopril: a nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, adverse effects, and dosage of lisinopril are reviewed. Lisinopril, a new nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, is absorbed in its active form. Like the other ACE inhibitors, it lowers peripheral vascular resistance, with a resultant decrease in blood pressure. Approximately 29% of lisinopril is absorbed after oral administration. No measurable metabolism occurs, and excretion is primarily renal. Accumulation of lisinopril occurs in patients with renal dysfunction; however, dosage adjustment is necessary only when the creatinine clearance is less than 30 mL/min. Lisinopril has been shown to be an effective antihypertensive agent at doses of 10 to 80 mg given once daily in patients with essential and secondary hypertension caused by renal artery stenosis. The effectiveness of lisinopril is comparable to that with diuretics, beta blockers, and calcium-channel antagonists. In patients who are unresponsive to maximal doses of lisinopril alone, addition of another antihypertensive agent may be beneficial. Limited information suggests that lisinopril may be comparable to captopril for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Adverse effects associated with lisinopril are relatively minor and are comparable to those associated with enalapril. Hematological abnormalities have not been reported with lisinopril. Class-related adverse effects include cough, azotemia, angioedema, hypotension, and hyperkalemia. Lisinopril appears to be comparable to other ACE inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension and may be as effective as its predecessors for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Further study is needed to better define a therapeutic niche for lisinopril.     

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and moderate hypertension

Recently there has been extensive development of orally active angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in addition to those already marketed, for example, captopril, enalapril, lisinopril and ramipril. It was initially thought that ACE inhibitors were likely to be most useful as antihypertensive agents in conditions in which circulating renin and angiotensin II were elevated. However, it is now clear that they can also lower arterial pressure when plasma renin is not high. In addition, they have beneficial effects in cardiac failure. Thus, captopril, enalapril, lisinopril and ramipril can be used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension either alone or in conjunction with diuretics or calcium antagonists. Broadly speaking, efficacy appears to be similar to that of beta-blockers or diuretics. Unfortunately, however, there are no long term studies comparing one ACE inhibitor with another or with other classes of antihypertensive agents. Furthermore, there are no prognostic studies which show that use of ACE inhibitors reduces morbidity or mortality in hypertension. Many new ACE inhibitors are undergoing clinical assessment, including alacepril, cilazapril, fosenopril, perindopril, quinapril and ramipril. The drugs vary, in that some exist in the active form whereas others are prodrugs which are converted to the active agent following absorption. In addition they each possess one of several ligands, for example, carboxyl, phosphinyl or sulfhydryl groups, and so vary in their affinity for ACE. Although many of these agents are renally excreted, a small number are metabolised via the liver (e.g. quinapril and spirapril) and this may prove advantageous in the presence of renal impairment. In common with captopril and enalapril, the new ACE inhibitors inhibit the renin-angiotensin system and initial results suggest that they are effective in lowering blood pressure in essential hypertension. Furthermore, they reduce systemic vascular resistance in the absence of a reflex tachycardia. There are a number of adverse effects which are attributable to the pharmacological mechanism of the ACE inhibitors as a group; these include hypotension, particularly in patients with high renin levels, prior diuretic use, renal impairment or in the elderly. Additional adverse effects may relate to chemical structure. The high incidence of adverse effects noted in early studies related to excess dosage and to the presence of a sulfhydryl group, which the more recently developed ACE inhibitors lack. The adverse effects most commonly reported with established and new ACE inhibitors include headache and fatigue, cough, skin rashes, hypotension and diarrhoea. As a group, ACE inhibitors have an acceptable but not negligible adverse effect burden.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Fixed combination trandolapril/verapamil sustained-release: a review of its use in essential hypertension

In well designed studies in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, combinations of the sustained-release (SR) formulation of the nondihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist verapamil 120 to 240 mg/day and the ACE inhibitor trandolapril 0.5 to 8 mg/day were significantly more effective in reducing sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline than placebo. In most randomised studies, combinations of verapamil SR 120 to 240 mg/day and trandolapril 0.5 to 8 mg/day were significantly more effective in lowering sitting DBP and SBP than the corresponding monotherapies administered at the same dosage. Trandolapril/verapamil SR 2/180 mg/day provided significantly more effective 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) control than of the corresponding monotherapies. Moreover, trandolapril/verapamil SR reduced BP in patients inadequately controlled with either of the corresponding monotherapies. The antihypertensive efficacy of trandolapril/verapamil SR 2/180 mg/day was generally similar to that of other combinations of antihypertensive agents (metoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol/chlorthalidone, lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide, enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide) in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trandolapril/verapamil SR reduced BP in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes or primary renal disease, Black patients and elderly patients. Trandolapril/verapamil SR was more effective than the individual components administered as monotherapy in reducing proteinuria in patients with type 2 diabetes or primary renal disease. Trandolapril/verapamil SR had a neutral or beneficial effect on metabolic parameters (glucose, insulin, lipids) in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes. Trandolapril/verapamil SR preserved left ventricular function in patients with heart failure. Fewer cardiac events occurred after therapy with trandolapril/verapamil SR than after trandolapril alone in post-myocardial infarction patients with congestive heart failure. The incidence of adverse events in recipients of trandolapril/verapamil SR was similar to that of the individual components, and that of other combination therapies. In placebo-controlled trials conducted in the US, headache, upper respiratory tract infections, cough, constipation, atrioventricular block (first degree) and dizziness were the most commonly reported adverse events in recipients of combinations of verapamil SR (120 to 240 mg/day) and trandolapril (0.5 to 8 mg/day). In conclusion, the fixed-dose combination of trandolapril/verapamil SR is an effective treatment for patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes. Trandolapril/verapamil SR tended to be more effective than monotherapy with either verapamil SR or trandolapril, and generally showed antihypertensive efficacy similar to that of other combination antihypertensive therapies. Current data support the use of trandolapril/verapamil SR as an alternative treatment when monotherapy with either agent is not effective. Data from large clinical trials currently being conducted will assist in fully defining the role of trandolapril/verapamil SR as a cardio- and renoprotective agent.     

Pharmacology of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, eprosartan

The non-peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists represent a new class of drugs with demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of hypertension. Eprosartan is a potent, orally active AT(1) receptor antagonist which is chemically distinct from losartan and other non-peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Eprosartan has a high affinity for the angiotensin II AT(1) receptor, but does not interact with the AT(2) receptor, adrenergic receptors or other receptors involved in cardiovascular regulation. In contrast to most other angiotensin II antagonists, eprosartan is a true competitive antagonist of the AT(1) receptor. Eprosartan is effective in antagonising the cardiovascular and renal effects of exogenous angiotensin II in both experimental animals and humans. Furthermore, it is an effective antihypertensive agent when administered to renin-dependent hypertension animal models, and in patients with mild to severe hypertension. The antihypertensive effect of eprosartan is maintained over a 24-h interval following a single dose with no reported dose-dependent adverse side-effects.