Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years

BACKGROUND: Revision of the femoral component of a total hip replacement with use of cement has been associated with early mechanical failure due to aseptic loosening. The purpose of the present study was to determine the long-term survival after revision of the femoral component with cement and to identify factors that were predictive of failure. METHODS: The results of 129 revision total hip arthroplasties that had been performed with use of a cemented femoral stem were reviewed to determine component survival. Ninety-seven hips that had been followed for a minimum of five years were included in survival analysis and tests of significance. Harris hip scores were used to quantify clinical outcomes. Clinical and surgical factors were analyzed to determine whether they were predictive of failure. RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score improved from 52 points preoperatively to 71 points at the time of the most recent follow-up (p < 0.001). The ten-year survival rate was 91% with rerevision of the femoral component because of aseptic loosening as the end point and 71% with mechanical failure as the end point. Patients who were more than sixty years old had greater long-term component survival and less pain than younger patients did (p < 0.05). A good-quality postoperative cement mantle was associated with better long-term radiographic signs of fixation (p < 0.001). Poor femoral bone quality was associated with an increased rate of rerevision for aseptic loosening (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Revision with use of a cemented femoral component remains an option for selected patients, with an acceptable ten-year survival rate and fair radiographic evidence of fixation. Our patients had acceptable clinical outcomes at ten years, and few had notable pain. The best results may be achieved in older patients (those who are sixty years old or more) with adequate bone stock who are managed with modern cementing techniques.     

Aortic thrombosis after acetabular revision of a total hip arthroplasty

In the case described, infrarenal aortic thrombosis occurred after acetabular component revision in an 86-year-old man with recurrent dislocation of a total hip arthroplasty. Early diagnosis and prompt emergency vascular bypass operation were successful in restoring flow to the extremity, although the dislocation recurred. The literature is reviewed, and judicious steps for the avoidance of this serious complication are discussed.     

Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years

BACKGROUND: Revision of a total hip arthroplasty in a patient who has had congenital hip dysplasia or dislocation is often more difficult than a standard revision operation. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and complications of use of a cementless hemispherical acetabular component for revision of an acetabular component of a failed total hip replacement in patients whose initial problem was arthritis secondary to congenital dislocation or dysplasia. The mean duration of follow-up was approximately eight years. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of sixty-one hips in fifty-three patients who underwent a cementless acetabular revision with use of a hemispherical acetabular component, with or without concurrent femoral revision. Data were collected prospectively. The mean age of the patients at the time of the index operation was fifty-six years. A mean of 1.9 ipsilateral hip operations had been performed previously. Thirty-nine hips (64 percent) had a so-called high hip center prior to the index revision. With one exception, the uncemented acetabular component was fixed with screws. Fifty-one acetabular components were placed with so-called line-to-line fit, and ten were oversized by one to three millimeters. In thirty-eight hips, the femoral component was revised as well. Twenty-nine femora were reconstructed with use of a cemented device, and nine were revised with an uncemented patch-porous-coated femoral stem (a stem on which the porous coating appears in patches). RESULTS: Four patients (five hips) died prior to the five-year minimum follow-up interval. With the exception of one hip treated with resection arthroplasty because of deep infection, none of the hips in these deceased patients had been revised or had a loose component. One living patient (one hip) had a resection arthroplasty, and one additional patient (two hips) had both stable acetabular components rerevised at the time of femoral rerevision at another institution because of loosening and osteolysis. One patient refused to return for follow-up, but the components had not been revised. The remaining fifty-two hips in forty-six patients were followed for a mean of 8.6 years (range, 5.0 to 12.7 years). The mean Harris hip score was 80 points (range, 56 to 100 points) at the time of the latest follow-up. No acetabular component had been revised, although two had migrated. No other acetabular component was loose according to our radiographic criteria. Thus, the mechanical failure rate on the acetabular side was 3 percent (two of sixty-one) for the entire series and 4 percent (two of fifty-two) for the patients who had been followed for a mean of 8.6 years. On the femoral side, the mechanical failure rate was 3 percent (one of twenty-nine) for the cemented stems and six of nine for the uncemented patch-porous-coated stems. CONCLUSIONS: Of the approaches used in this difficult series of patients requiring revision, the hybrid arthroplasty (a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component) yielded overall good results after an intermediate duration of follow-up.     

Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up

Purpose

Modular acetabular reconstructive cups have been introduced in an attempt to offer initial rigid fixation by iliac lag screws and ischial pegs, to support bone grafts with a flanged metal socket, and to restore original hip center in acetabular revision. The purpose of this study was to clarify minimum ten year follow-up results of this cup system with morsellised allografts in revision cases.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 54 acetabular revisions at a mean of 11 years (range, ten to 14 years). The indications were Paprosky’s type 2B (eight hip), 2C (eight hips), 3A (23 hips), 3B (nine hips), and 4 (six hips).

Results

Using aseptic loosening as the endpoints, the survival rate was 89.3 % (95 % CI 81–98). Radiographically, one type 3A hip, three type 3B hips and one type 4 hip showed aseptic loosening while no type 2 hips or no cemented cups showed loosening.

Conclusions

The modular reconstructive cups for acetabular revision showed bone stock restoration and stable implantation.     

Using intraoperative pelvic landmarks for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty is frequently due to acetabular malpositioning. Positioning of the acetabular component using anatomical landmarks may reduce the incidence of dislocation from improper acetabular orientation. The pelvis provides 3 bony landmarks (ilium, superior pubic ramus, and superior acetabulum), which, when used to define a plane, allows cup orientation in abduction and version. Landmarks evaluated in 24 cadaveric acetabuli allowed slightly increased abduction and anteversion of the cup, compared with native acetabuli. Six hundred seventeen primary total hip arthroplasties were performed between 1996 and 2003 using this technique. Mean cup abduction was 44.4 degrees with 13.2 degrees of anteversion. This technique allows satisfactory reproducible cup orientation based on individual pelvic morphology. Review of patient outcome data suggest high patient satisfaction and lower dislocation rate without additional equipment, time, or cost.     

A technique for removing a well-fixed cemented acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty

We describe a relatively safe technique for the removal of a cemented acetabular cup using multiple drill holes in the polyethylene cup. This technique helps to keep the integrity of the acetabular ring such that only the cup with the cement is removed. This technique has been shown to be relatively safe where a significant medial acetabular wall defect exists. We have been using this technique for several years with excellent results.     

High placement of porous-coated acetabular components in complex total hip arthroplasty

The authors retrospectively evaluated the results of 56 hips in 51 patients with an acetabular deficiency who had a total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated, cementless acetabular component implanted at a high hip center. Forty-nine cases were revisions and seven were primary operations. The mean height of the hip center was 43 mm above the interteardrop line compared to 14 mm for the anatomic center, threefold higher than normal. In contrast, the mean horizontal locus was reduced compared to normal (33 vs 37 mm for the anatomic center). Sixteen acetabular components were small (46–48 mm o.d.) and eight were miniature (40–44 mm o.d.). Despite superior placement of the acetabular component, 32 limbs were lengthened by the procedure. The mean preoperative Harris hip score was 51 (range, 28–93). At a mean follow-up period of 40 months (range, 24–64 months), the mean Harris hip score was 86 (range, 36–100). In 23 hips no radiolucent lines were present at the interface of the bone to the porous mesh, and 33 hips had a thin (0.5 mm), nonprogressive radiolucent line in one or more zones. No acetabular component had migrated and no problems occurred with the screws. Four hips (3 revisions and 1 primary operation) had a complete radiolucent line on one oblique view of the acetabulum. No acetabular component has been revised for loosening. These short-term data suggest that under circumstances in which the acetabulum cannot be reconstructed at the anatomic level without a major structural bone-graft, superior placement of the porous-coated acetabular component against viable host-bone at a higher level than normal may be an acceptable alternative.     

Structural acetabular allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty

Structural allografts are a surgical option only in cases of severe bone loss. Structural allografting techniques have been developed to fill large bony defects and can be used to provide structural support and reconstitute bone stock. Superior dome allografts are utilized when 50% or more of host bone is available for contact with the ingrowth cup. In revision surgery where the allograft supports more than 50% of the reconstruction, complications are more common. Although good results are reported, implant failure and graft resorption are more commonly seen. The addition of a reconstruction ring to the reconstruction unloads some of the stress applied to the allograft. In these cases, superior results have been reported.     

Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report

We previously reported our results at a minimum of three and seven years after use of a porous-coated acetabular metal shell in a consecutive series of 138 revision total hip arthroplasties. The current report presents the longer-term outcomes of these procedures, at fifteen to nineteen years postoperatively. A total of twenty metal shells (14%) underwent repeat revision. Seven of the repeat revisions were performed because of recurrent dislocation, seven were done at the time of femoral revision surgery, and six were done because of infection. Nineteen of the revised shells were well fixed, and one was aseptically loose. Of the sixty-seven hips in which the acetabular component survived for more than fifteen years after the index operation, two (3%) required a change of the modular acetabular liner because of wear or osteolysis. Nine (16%) of the fifty-seven hips with at least fifteen years of radiographic follow-up had an osteolytic lesion of >1 cm in diameter. The fifteen-year survival rate of the metal shells, with failure defined as revision because of loosening or as radiographic evidence of loosening, was 97%. Revision total hip arthroplasty with this cementless acetabular component has been followed by excellent component survivorship at fifteen years; the most common reasons for repeat revision were recurrent dislocation and infection.     

Ten to fifteen-year follow-up after total hip arthroplasty with a tapered cobalt-chromium femoral component (tri-lock) inserted without cement

BACKGROUND: Fixation of the femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty without cement has had variable results. While tapered stems appear to have consistently good results, the duration of follow-up in many series has been relatively short. The purpose of this study was to present a longer-term (ten to fifteen-year) follow-up after total hip arthroplasty with insertion of a tapered femoral component without cement. METHODS: Sixty-seven total hip arthroplasties were performed with insertion of a tapered, cobalt-chromium femoral component without cement in fifty-eight patients from 1983 to 1986. Thirteen patients (fifteen hips) died prior to the fifteen-year follow-up examination, and three patients (three hips) were lost to follow-up after ten years, leaving forty-two patients (forty-nine hips) who were followed clinically for a mean of fifteen years. Thirty-seven of the forty-nine hips were followed radiographically for fifteen years, and the remaining twelve were followed for a minimum of ten years. RESULTS: The mean preoperative Charnley score was 3.0 points for pain, 2.7 points for function, and 3.2 points for motion. At the time of the final follow-up, the mean scores were 5.6, 5.6, and 5.2 points, respectively. Although no preoperative Harris hip scores were available, the mean score at the time of the latest follow-up was 92 points (range, 78 to 100 points). There were no revisions because of isolated aseptic loosening of the femoral component (although revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component led to femoral component revision in seven hips). Two femoral components showed radiographic evidence of instability. At fifteen years, the prevalence of thigh pain was 2%. No femoral component that was thought to be stable, with bone ingrowth at two years, lost fixation. CONCLUSIONS: The design features of this cobalt-chromium femoral component (i.e., the collarless, tapered, wedge fit with circumferential porous coating) are thought to be crucial to the achievement of the good-to-excellent results seen in this study.     

Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty

Reconstruction of the failed acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be challenging. Although there are multiple reconstructive options available, a cementless acetabular component inserted with screws has been shown to have good intermediate-term results and is the reconstructive method of choice for the majority of acetabular revisions. We reviewed the results of 138 consecutive acetabular revisions done with a hemispheric, cementless acetabular component that is sintered with Ti fiber metal mesh and was inserted with line-to-line reaming and multiple screws for fixation. At a mean of 15 years, 19 acetabular components had been revised (13.8%); seven were revised for recurrent instability, six were revised for deep periprosthetic infection, five well-fixed cups were removed at the time of femoral revision, and one cup was fixed by fibrous tissue only at the time of femoral revision and was removed. One acetabular component was radiographically loose. Survivorship of the component was 81% at 15 years when revision for any reason was considered as an end point and 96% when revision for loosening or radiographic evidence of loosening was considered as a second end point. Cementless acetabular revision provides durable results at 15 years with a low rate of failure for loosening.     

Improving initial acetabular component stability in revision total hip arthroplasty calcium phosphate cement vs reverse reamed cancellous allograft

A reproducible retroacetabular defect was created bilaterally in 9 cadaver pelves. The defects were filled with either an injectable, bioresorbable, calcium phosphate cement, or reverse-reamed cancellous allograft. An uncemented acetabular shell was impacted, followed by the placement of an appropriate liner. The pelves were then sectioned, and each half was loaded in a material testing machine to simulate walking on the construct over a several week period. The cement-filled defects lasted a greater number of cycles before failure and had greater cup stability and stiffness. The use of resorbable bone void filler for retroacetabular defects shows promise in this biomechanical analysis. Long-term clinical follow-up is warranted to track osseointegration of the implant and restoration of bone stock between this and other clinically accepted surgical techniques.     

Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study

A retrospective review was undertaken of thirty-seven hips (thirty-four patients) that had had a complex cemented total hip arthroplasty. In these hips, circumstances had necessitated that the center of the hip be placed farther proximally, as measured from the interteardrop line, than the anatomical position that is normally used. The mean duration of clinical and roentgenographic follow-up was eleven years (range, seven to seventeen years), and the mean age of the patients was fifty-one years (range, sixteen to seventy-three years). Most of these hips had a major deficiency or defect of the acetabular bone stock, or both. Of the six acetabular components (16 per cent) that became loose and were followed for ten years, only one needed revision. Because this study was aimed specifically at assessment of the acetabular component, if the femoral component alone needed revision, the final clinical rating that was used was the one obtained after the femoral revision. Thirty-one hips (84 per cent) were rated as having a good or excellent result; they had an average Harris hip-rating score of 43 points preoperatively and 93 points postoperatively. Thirty-three of the thirty-seven acetabular components were not substantially displaced laterally as compared with the anatomical location that is normally used. Our findings suggest that, when circumstances dictate, proximal positioning of the acetabular component without lateral displacement can give an acceptable result in cemented total hip-replacement procedures.     

Segmental cement extraction at revision total hip arthroplasty.

Cement removal in revision total hip arthroplasty can be technically challenging. Traditional methods involve using a combination of chisels, power burrs, and drills, as well as windowing the femoral cortex to gain access to cement distally. These methods can be associated with femoral fracture or uncontrolled cortical perforation and bone loss. A new technique had been developed that permits segmental extraction of bone cement from the femoral canal. Fresh cement is introduced into the old cement mantle and a threaded rod is placed into the wet cement and held in place while the cement hardens. The thread-forming rod is then removed leaving a threaded channel in the cement. Extraction rods are then screwed 1.5 to 2.5 cm into the threaded channel. A slap hammer, which attaches to the opposite end of the extraction rod, is used to remove 1.5- to 2.5-cm segments of cement. Fifteen cases involving revision of cemented femoral components were analyzed using this system. Complete cement removal was achieved in 12 cases with much less damage to the femur when compared with conventional methods. In two cases, there was retained cement along the medial wall of the femur and, in one case, the plug could not be extracted using this system. There were no fractures or cortical perforations in this series.     

High placement of noncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report

We previously reported the average ten-year results associated with the use of porous-coated noncemented acetabular shells that were placed at a high hip center at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty in thirty-four patients (thirty-six hips) with severe acetabular bone loss. We now report the average 16.8-year results for twenty-one patients (twenty-three hips). Of the original cohort of forty-four patients (forty-six hips), thirty-nine patients (forty-one hips; 89%) retained the shell. Two shells (4.3%) were revised because of aseptic loosening, and three (6.5%) were revised because of infection. Six femoral components were revised because of femoral osteolysis, and seven were revised because of aseptic loosening without osteolysis. On the basis of our results after an average duration of follow-up of 16.8 years, we believe that the placement of an uncemented acetabular component at a high hip center continues to be an excellent technique for revision total hip arthroplasty in selected patients with severe acetabular bone loss.     

Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency

BACKGROUND: Massive deficiency of acetabular bone stock is a challenging problem in the increasing number of patients who need a revision of a failed hip arthroplasty. The bilobed cup has been presented as one alternative reconstruction technique for hips with extensive acetabular bone loss. The purpose of this study was to assess the results with use of a bilobed acetabular component inserted without cement for revision reconstruction in hips with acetabular bone deficiency in order to clarify the indications for its use and to identify the factors that influence the clinical and radiographic outcome. METHODS: Forty-one hips in thirty-eight patients had an acetabular revision with a bilobed acetabular component inserted without cement between December 1991 and December 1995. These hips were a subset of the 414 hips treated with an acetabular revision during the same period of time. One patient was lost to follow-up, and one died during the study period. Two patients who could not return for radiographic evaluation completed questionnaires. The remaining thirty-four patients (thirty-seven hips) were evaluated radiographically and clinically and were followed for an average of forty-one months (range, twenty-four to sixty-six months). RESULTS: Radiographic analysis demonstrated an improvement in the average vertical displacement of the hip center. At the time of the latest follow-up examination, 76 percent (twenty-eight) of the thirty-seven cups were stable, 8 percent (three) were probably unstable with a change in the screw position but no definite migration of the cup, and 16 percent (six) were unstable. Eight of the nine loose or probably loose components were in patients who had more than two centimeters of superior migration of the component and disruption of Kohler's line on preoperative radiographs. Additionally, implants were more likely to become unstable (demonstrating more than 4 degrees of change in the abduction angle or more than four millimeters of radiographic migration) when the inferior aspect of the component did not extend to or distal to the interteardrop line, which indicated that the component was undersized. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our early rate of probable or definite loosening of 24 percent (nine of thirty-seven cups) and the technical difficulties involved, we do not recommend the routine use of this component. We believe that this device is indicated when a patient has an oblong-shaped acetabular defect and the surgeon wants to correct an elevated hip center. However, the medial wall of the acetabulum (Kohler's line) should be intact if the failed component has migrated more than two centimeters. An alternative reconstruction technique, such as use of a structural allograft with or without an acetabular cage, is also an option in this situation.