Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients

OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that weight-reduction (bariatric) surgery reduces long-term mortality in morbidly obese patients. BACKGROUND: Obesity is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The impact of surgically induced, long-term weight loss on this mortality is unknown. METHODS: We used an observational 2-cohort study. The treatment cohort (n = 1035) included patients having undergone bariatric surgery at the McGill University Health Centre between 1986 and 2002. The control group (n = 5746) included age- and gender-matched severely obese patients who had not undergone weight-reduction surgery identified from the Quebec provincial health insurance database. Subjects with medical conditions (other then morbid obesity) at cohort-inception into the study were excluded. The cohorts were followed for a maximum of 5 years from inception. RESULTS: The cohorts were well matched for age, gender, and duration of follow-up. Bariatric surgery resulted in significant reduction in mean percent excess weight loss (67.1%, P < 0.001). Bariatric surgery patients had significant risk reductions for developing cardiovascular, cancer, endocrine, infectious, psychiatric, and mental disorders compared with controls, with the exception of hematologic (no difference) and digestive diseases (increased rates in the bariatric cohort). The mortality rate in the bariatric surgery cohort was 0.68% compared with 6.17% in controls (relative risk 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.27), which translates to a reduction in the relative risk of death by 89%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that weight-loss surgery significantly decreases overall mortality as well as the development of new health-related conditions in morbidly obese patients.     

Survival and changes in comorbidities after bariatric surgery

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate survival rates and changes in weight-related comorbid conditions after bariatric surgery in a high-risk patient population as compared with a similar cohort of morbidly obese patients who did not undergo surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Morbid obesity is increasingly becoming a major public health issue. Existing studies are limited in their ability to assess the risks and benefits of bariatric surgery because few studies compare surgical patients to a similar, morbidly obese, nonsurgical cohort, especially in high-risk populations like the elderly and disabled. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis using Medicare fee-for-service patients from 2001 to 2004. Survival rates and diagnosed presence of 5 conditions commonly comorbid with morbid obesity were examined for morbidly obese patients who did and did not undergo bariatric surgery, with up to 2 years follow-up. RESULTS: Morbidly obese Medicare patients who underwent bariatric surgery had increased survival rates over the 2 years of this study when compared with a similar morbidly obese nonsurgical group (P < 0.001). For patients under the age of 65, this survival advantage started at 6 months postoperatively and for patients over age 65, at 11 months. The surgical group also experienced significant improvements in the diagnosed prevalence of 5 weight-related comorbid conditions (diabetes, sleep apnea, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease) relative to the nonsurgical cohort after 1 year postsurgery (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery appears to increase survival even in the high-risk, Medicare population, both for individuals aged 65 and older and those disabled and under 65. In addition, the diagnosed prevalence of weight-related comorbid conditions declined after bariatric surgery relative to a control cohort of morbidly obese patients who did not undergo surgery.     

Routine cholecystectomy is not mandatory during morbid obesity surgery

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists concerning the utility of routine cholecystectomy during bariatric surgery. We report our series of bariatric surgical procedures at our institution without concurrent cholecystectomy. METHODS: From October 2003 to August 2005, 621 morbidly obese patients underwent a weight loss operation. Preoperatively, each patient had undergone abdominal ultrasound (AUS) to evaluate for abnormal gallbladder findings. Patients with previous cholecystectomy were excluded. Symptomatic patients with AUS findings consistent with gallbladder disease underwent concomitant cholecystectomy and bariatric surgery. Asymptomatic patients, despite AUS findings, did not undergo cholecystectomy with their bariatric operation. A comparison between the preoperative AUS-positive and AUS-negative, asymptomatic patients after bariatric surgery was performed. RESULTS: Of the 621 patients who underwent bariatric surgery, 170 (27%) had undergone previous cholecystectomy and were excluded. Of the remaining 451 patients, 17 with positive AUS findings and symptoms underwent cholecystectomy during bariatric surgery. The range of follow-up was 4-25 months. Of the 451 patients, 324 were asymptomatic and had negative AUS findings and 102 were asymptomatic and had positive AUS findings for gallbladder abnormalities. Postoperatively, 29 asymptomatic/AUS-negative patients (9%) developed symptoms and had positive AUS findings. Nine asymptomatic patients with AUS positive findings (9%) developed symptoms. Finally, 38 patients (8.4%) went on to undergo elective cholecystectomy. These 2 groups were not signficantly different statistically. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the development of symptomatic/AUS-positive gallbladder abnormalities was low after obesity surgery, suggesting that mandatory cholecystectomy is not required at bariatric surgery.     

Impact of bariatric surgery on cardiovascular and musculoskeletal morbidity

BACKGROUND: Obesity is currently recognized as a global epidemic. According to recent statistics, the prevalence of obesity increased from 13.8% of the Canadian population in 1978-1979 to 23.1% in 2004, and the prevalence of morbid obesity increased from .9% in 1978-1979 to 2.7% in 2004. Obesity is a known risk factor for highly prevalent chronic diseases, including cardiovascular and musculoskeletal disorders. The objective of the study was to assess the impact of bariatric surgery on cardiovascular and musculoskeletal morbidity. METHODS: This was an observational study that compared a cohort of 1035 morbidly obese patients treated with bariatric surgery at the Centre for Bariatric Surgery, McGill University Health Centre with a matched cohort of 5746 morbidly obese nonsurgically treated controls. Data were obtained from the Quebec provincial health insurance database (Régie de l'Assurance Maladie du Québec). Morbidity indicators included diagnoses or treatment for cardiovascular or musculoskeletal disorders. RESULTS: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery had a significant 62% mean reduction in excess weight and 32% mean reduction in body mass index (P < .001). Compared with the matched controls, patients who had undergone bariatric surgery had significantly lower rates of diagnoses and treatments related to cardiovascular and musculoskeletal conditions. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that bariatric surgery is effective in reducing weight and significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular and musculoskeletal morbidity.     

Impact of accreditation in bariatric surgery

BackgroundSeveral studies have shown improved outcomes associated with accredited bariatric centers. The aim of our study was to examine the outcomes of bariatric surgery performed at accredited versus nonaccredited centers using a nationally representative database. Additionally, we aimed to determine if the presence of bariatric surgery accreditation could lead to improved outcomes for morbidly obese patients undergoing other general laparoscopic operations.MethodsUsing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, for data between 2008 and 2010, clinical data of morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery, laparoscopic antireflux surgery, cholecystectomy, and colectomy were analyzed according to the hospital’s bariatric accreditation status.ResultsA total of 277,068 bariatric operations were performed during the 3-year period, with 88.4% of cases performed at accredited centers. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower at accredited compared to nonaccredited centers (.08% versus .19%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that nonaccredited centers had higher risk-adjusted mortality for bariatric procedures compared to accredited centers (odds ratio [OR] 3.1, P<.01). Post hoc analysis showed improved mortality for patients who underwent gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at accredited centers compared to nonaccredited centers (.09% versus .27%, respectively, P<.01). Patients with a high severity of illness who underwent bariatric surgery also had lower mortality rates when the surgery was performed at accredited versus nonaccredited centers (.17% versus .45%, respectively, P<.01). Multivariate analysis showed that morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OR 2.4, P<.05) and antireflux surgery (OR 2.03, P<.01) at nonaccredited centers had higher rates of serious complications.ConclusionAccreditation in bariatric surgery was associated with more than a 3-fold reduction in risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Resources established for bariatric surgery accreditation may have the secondary benefit of improving outcomes for morbidly obese patients undergoing general laparoscopic operations.     

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Morbidly Obese Bariatric Patients with Concurrent Hepatitis B Viral Infection

Background Bariatric surgery is the only effective and long-lasting treatment of morbidly obese patients. However, the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in patients with hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection is not clear. The aim of the present study is to investigate weather HBV infection influences clinic features and outcomes of bariatric surgery. Methods The preoperative seropositivity of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) using radioimmunoassay was determined in 592 patients (481 female, 111 male: mean age 30.5 ± 8.1 years; mean body mass index [BMI] 43.1 ± 6.0) who had undergone bariatric surgery (209 banding and 383 gastric bypass) for their morbid obesity in the past 5 years. All the clinical data were prospectively collected and stored. Results The overall seroprevalence of HbsAg was 18.8%. Morbidly obese patients positive for HBV infection were associated with older age and higher diastolic blood pressure, but not with sex, BMI, liver enzyme, blood lipid, and glucose levels. Although minigastric bypass (MGB) had a better weight reduction than gastric banding, there was no difference in weight reduction between patients who were positive and negative for HBV infection. The weight loss curves and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities were similar between the two groups except the postoperative aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) were significantly higher in patients who were positive for HBV infection. During follow-up, two patients developed fulminating hepatitis after MGB with one mortality. Conclusion Morbidly obese patients with the existence of HBV infection do not influence the outcome of bariatric surgery, but continuing monitor of the liver function is indicated.     

Unchanged Hypovitaminosis D and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Morbid Obesity after Bariatric Surgery

Background: Morbidly obese patients have been reported to present with vitamin D insufficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism. We assessed whether bariatric surgery alters the 25-hydroxyvitamin D (calcidiol) and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels in patients presenting with morbid obesity. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 144 patients of whom 80 had not undergone bariatric surgery, while 64 had bariatric surgery at a mean of 36 months previously. Calcidiol levels were defined as being normal (>50 nmol/L), insufficient (2550 nmol/L) and deficient (<25 nmol/L). Mild secondary hyperparathyroidism was defined as iPTH >7.3 pmol/L with simultaneous normal values for creatinine, calcium and phosphorus. Results: 80% of the patients presented low vitamin D levels and mild secondary hyperparathyroidism. Previous surgery or the presence of diabetes did not influence calcidiol levels. Corrected serum calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, iPTH and Calcidiol were similar between subjects with and without surgery. Conclusions: Vitamin D deficient states with secondary hyperparathyroidism in the morbidly obese precede and are not significantly affected by bariatric surgery. Hypovitaminosis D with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to low calcidiol bio-availability should be added to the crowded list of sequelae of morbid obesity. While further studies are warranted, it seems advisable to support vitamin D supplementation in the morbidly obese population.     

Clinical Significance of Central Obesity in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Background: Laparoscopic surgery had increased the interest and growth of bariatric surgery. Whether central obesity has any adverse effect in laparoscopic bariatric surgery is not clear. Methods: 612 morbidly obese patients received laparoscopic bariatric surgery,in a prospectively controlled clinical trial of the outcome of the bariatric surgery. For comparison, subjects were dichotomized into either a central obesity group or peripheral obesity group, based on waist/hip ratio (WHR). Various biochemistry and blood count variables, and perioperative and postoperative results were measured. Results: There were more female (458) than male patients (154). Male patients had higher BMI, and female patients were younger. 56 of 154 male patients (36.4%) belonged to the central obesity (WHR >1.0), and 321 of 458 female patients (70.1%) had central obesity (WHR >0.85). Central obesity was associated with age but not with BMI in males. In females, central obesity was associated with increased BMI. Central obesity predicted increased hyperglycemia and triglyceride levels in both male and female patients. Male patients with central obesity had higher WBC counts than the other patients. Although central obesity was associated with more intra-operative blood loss and prolonged recovery in female patients, there was no increase in complication rate or difference in postoperative weight loss. Conclusion: Central obesity is associated with a higher degree of hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and leukocytosis in morbidly obese patients who undergo bariatric surgery. Although there is increased technical difficulty in patients with severe central obesity, laparoscopic bariatric surgery is safe and effective in producing weight loss.     

Return to work after gastric bypass in Medicaid-funded morbidly obese patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether medically disabled (Medicaid-funded) morbidly obese patients return to the workforce after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). DESIGN: Retrospective clinical data review. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: From January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2002, 38 medically disabled patients underwent RYGB performed by a single surgeon. Sixteen medically disabled patients seen by the same surgeon did not undergo surgery and served as a control group. INTERVENTION: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Full-time employment. RESULTS: The patients who underwent RYBG were more likely to return to work, with 14 (37%) working, compared with 1 (6%) of the nonoperative control patients (P = .02). Elimination of comorbidities was associated with a greater likelihood of return to work. Patients who had greater than the mean decrease in comorbid conditions at the time of follow-up were statistically more likely to return to work than those who did not have a reversal in comorbid conditions (P = .001). Health-related quality of life was very poor preoperatively and improved in all domains after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity is associated with many medical conditions that often render patients disabled. We found that 37% of morbidly obese patients with Medicaid coverage returned to work after RYGB, compared with 6% of patients in the nonoperative control group. This study suggests that RYGB, the most effective available means to achieve durable weight loss and reduction of comorbidities in morbidly obese patients, results in significant rehabilitation of Medicaid-funded morbidly obese individuals.     

Gallstone Formation after Weight Loss following Gastric Banding in Morbidly Obese Dutch Patients

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for the development of gallstones. Rapid weight loss may be an even stronger risk factor. We retrospectively assessed the prevalence and risk factors of gallstone formation after adjustable gastric banding (AGB) in a Dutch population. Methods: All patients who underwent AGB between Jan 1992 and Dec 2000 for morbid obesity were invited to take part in this study. Transabdominal ultrasonography of the gallbladder was performed in those patients without a prior history of cholecystectomy (Group A). Additionally, 45 morbidly obese patients underwent ultrasonography of the gallbladder before weight reduction surgery (Group B). Results: 120 patients were enrolled in the study (Group A). Prior history of cholecystectomy was present in 21 patients: 16 before and 5 after AGB. Ultrasonography was performed in 98 patients: gallstones were present in 26 (26.5%). On multivariate analysis, neither preoperative weight, nor maximum weight loss, nor the interval between operation and the postoperative ultrasonography were determinants of the risk for developing gallstone disease. Prevalence of gallstones was significantly lower in the morbidly obese patients who had not yet undergone weight reduction surgery (Group B). Conclusions: Rapid weight loss induced by AGB, is an important risk factor for the development of gallstones. No additional determinants were found. Every morbidly obese patient undergoing bariatric surgery must be considered at risk for developing gallstone disease.     

Impact of Psychosocial Stress and Symptoms on Indication for Bariatric Surgery and Outcome in Morbidly Obese Patients

Background: Obese patients often suffer from physical and psychiatric co-morbidity. Bariatric surgery has been widely used to treat morbid obesity. The present study addresses the issues of the impact of psychosocial stress and symptoms on indication for and outcome of bariatric surgery. Methods: A sample of 131 morbidly obese patients applying for bariatric surgery underwent assessment via the Psychosocial Stress and Symptom Questionnaire (PSSQ). Patients were categorized as under little/no (below cut-off) or great (above cut-off) psychosocial stress. 2 years after their first assessment and 1 year after potential bariatric surgery, 119 patients (90.8% participation rate), 69 of whom were treated surgically, were followed up by a telephone interview asking for outcome variables such as BMI, employability, medication, doctor consultations, and physical/psychological well-being. Results: 86 patients (72.3%) scored above the cutoff in the PSSQ.There was no correlation between the result of the PSSQ and the surgeons' indication for bariatric surgery. 69 patients (58.0%) underwent bariatric surgery, of whom 48 had PSSQ scores above the cut-off. Individuals under great psychosocial stress experienced the same positive physical and psychological well-being after surgery as subjects under little or no stress. Psychosocially stressed patients (n = 38) who did not undergo surgery showed the worst outcome. Conclusion: Great psychosocial stress in morbidly obese subjects should not be a contraindication for bariatric surgery. However, those patients should receive pre- and post-surgical counseling, to reduce anxiety before surgery and increase compliance after surgery.     

Bariatric surgery reduces cancer risk in morbidly obese patients

BackgroundTo assess the effect of bariatric surgery on the cancer risk of patients with morbid obesity because evidence is mounting of an association between obesity and cancer.MethodsWe performed an observational 2-cohort study. The treatment cohort (n = 1035) included patients who had undergone bariatric surgery from 1986 to 2002. The control group (n = 5746) included age- and gender-matched morbidly obese patients who had not undergone weight-reduction surgery and who were identified from a single-payor administrative database. The subjects with physician or hospital visits for a cancer-related diagnosis or treatment within the 6 months previous to the beginning of the study were excluded. The cohorts were followed up for a maximum of 5 years from study inception.ResultsBariatric surgery resulted in a significant reduction in the mean percentage of excess weight loss (67.1%, P <.001). The surgery patients had significantly fewer physician/hospital visits for all cancer diagnoses (n = 21, 2.0%) compared with the controls (n = 487, 8.45%; relative risk .22, 95% confidence interval .143–.347; P = .001). The physician/hospital visits for common cancers such as breast cancer were significantly reduced in the surgery group (P = .001). For all other cancers, the physician/hospital visits showed a trend toward being lower in the surgery group. Because of the low frequencies, statistical significance could not be demonstrated for individual cancer diagnoses.ConclusionThe data suggest that bariatric surgery improves the cancer outcomes in some morbidly obese patients.     

Factors Influencing Primary Care Physicians' Referral for Bariatric Surgery

Background and Objectives:

Bariatric surgery has been shown to be an effective weight loss treatment for the morbidly obese, but some primary care physicians remain hesitant about postoperative treatment and management of patients who have undergone the surgery and recommend it to their obese patients infrequently. The purpose of this study was to evaluate perceptions of primary care physicians of the role of bariatric surgery in the management of obese patients and to identify possible barriers to treatment.

Methods:

A survey of PCPs within our institution was conducted to determine attitudes, knowledge, and practices regarding the treatment of morbidly obese patients, with a specific focus on identifying factors that influence referral patterns for bariatric surgery.

Results:

Among 161 eligible PCPs, 57 (35.4%) responded. Most respondents (59%) reported that at least 1 in 4 of their patients had a BMI ≥35 kg/m². Although 39% thought that diet and exercise were an effective means of sustained weight loss, only 12% were satisfied with prescribing nonsurgical interventions. Sixty-three percent agreed that bariatric surgery is generally effective in the long term. All respondents were aware of the commonly established benefits, including improvement of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. In addition, 65% were familiar with the indications for bariatric surgery, and 70% felt comfortable discussing it with patients as a treatment option. Fewer than half of the respondents felt confident in providing postoperative management. Cost was a perceived limitation, with 53% reporting that most of their patients could not afford bariatric surgery.

Conclusions:

The general attitude of PCPs toward bariatric surgery is supportive. Physicians are largely aware of the indications and benefits; however, far fewer are comfortable in management of patients after surgery. A lack of supplemental information and concerns regarding the cost of surgery can impede treatment and referrals.     

Prevalence of Obesity Among Children and/or Grandchildren of Adult Bariatric Surgery Patients

Background  Clinical experience suggests that some adults who undergo bariatric surgery have children who are obese. Childhood obesity is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in later life. This study examined the prevalence of obesity among children and grandchildren (≤12 years of age) of adult bariatric surgery patients. Methods  Patients in a prospective database of morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery between January 2004 and May 2007 were recruited by phone and in clinic. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI) at surgery, and survey data were collected. The survey included questions regarding their child/grandchild's body habitus, weight, and height. Child obesity was defined as BMI percentile ≥95. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results  One hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study (77% women, mean BMI 49 kg/m²). One hundred thirty-four out of 233 children/grandchildren identified had complete data; 41% had a BMI percentile ≥95. Only 29% of these obese children were so identified by the adult respondents. Significantly more biological children/grandchildren were obese than nonbiological (p = 0.013), and significantly more biological children were obese than biological grandchildren (p = 0.027). Conclusions  This sample of bariatric surgery patients had a high proportion of obese preteen children/grandchildren. Obesity was most prevalent among biological children (vs. biological grandchildren and nonbiological children). Patients often did not recognize the degree of overweight in their children/grandchildren. Because families of bariatric surgery patients often include obese children, interventions aimed at all family members merit consideration.     

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Morbidly Obese with the Metabolic Syndrome at US Academic Centers

Background  The metabolic syndrome is associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We assessed the in-hospital outcomes of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients with the metabolic syndrome in comparison to a control group without the metabolic syndrome. Methods  Using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes, clinical data for 20,242 patients with and without the metabolic syndrome who underwent bariatric surgery over a 5-year period were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium database. Results  The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among bariatric surgery patients was 27.4%. Patients with the metabolic syndrome presented significantly higher overall morbidity as compared to morbidly obese patients without the metabolic syndrome (8.6% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.01), and similar mortality (0.04% vs. 0.01%; p = 0.2) after bariatric surgery. Hispanics with the metabolic syndrome had the highest morbidity rates, and men had the uppermost mortality. In-hospital bariatric surgery outcomes were significantly improved among patients who underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Conclusions  The data suggest that the presence of the metabolic syndrome affects inter-ethnic and gender-specific short-term outcomes after bariatric surgery.     

Bariatric Re-operations: Are They Preventable?

Background: Many operations are currently used for morbid obesity, and every procedure appears to have advantages, drawbacks and failures. Re-operation is a part of bariatric surgery practice that is necessary in the event of failure. We analyzed the reasons for failure in the bariatric re-operation group. Methods: From June 1998 to April 2000, 17 morbidly obese patients had a bariatric re-operation. Of 203 bariatric operations performed in our institution, 12 patients had a re-operation (5.9%), and 5 patients had their primary procedure performed elsewhere. Mean age was 36.5 ±11 years, mean original weight 151.3 ± 44.3 kg, mean BMI 58.4±16.9 kg/m2 and mean excess body weight (EBW) 94.4±43.5 kg. Mean height was 161±7.7 cm, and 15 patients were female (88.2%).The primary bariatric operation was vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) in 15 patients (88.2%), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) in 1 patient (5.9%), and gastric banding in 1 patient (5.9%). Duration since the primary surgery was a mean of 15.6 months (range 1-72 months). Results: Reasons for re-operation were inadequate weight loss (47%) or food intolerance (53%). 11 patients had VBG converted to RYGBP,1 patient had a gastric banding converted to a BPD, 4 patients had their VBG converted to a gastro-gastrostomy, and 1 patient had a RYGBP staple dehiscence re-stapled. Conclusion: Incidence of bariatric re-operations may be decreased if super-obese patients, older patients, and sweets-consuming individuals undergo RYGBP or BPD as the primary operation rather than VBG or gastric banding. The use of staplers transecting and separating the gastric pouch from the remaining stomach can decrease staple dehiscence.     

Bariatric Surgery in Some "Central and East-European (former Eastern bloc)"Countries - Current Status and Prediction for the Next Millennium

Background: Obesity is increasing globallly, including in the formerly "Eastern Bloc" countries. Methods: A survey was made of obesity and bariatric surgery. Results: In the 8 East and Central European countries studied, with total population 300 million, roughly 43% of the population was overweight (BMI 25-30), 23% obese (BMI > 30), with about 15 million people morbidly obese (BMI > 40). From 0-10 morbidly obese individuals/100,000/year undergo bariatric surgery. Conclusion: Most countries were found to provide inadequate treatment for obesity.The majority of the morbidly obese are not treated effectively. However, health-care awareness of obesity and bariatric surgeons are slowly increasing.     

Hiatal hernia diagnosis prospectively assessed in obese patients before bariatric surgery: accuracy of high-resolution manometry taking intraoperative diagnosis as reference standard

Hiatal hernia (HH) is common in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Preoperative traditional techniques such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) or barium swallow/esophagram do not always correlate with intraoperative findings. High-resolution manometry (HRM) has shown a higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional techniques in non-obese patients in the HH diagnosis, whereas there is a lack of data in the morbidly obese population. We aimed to prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of HRM in HH detection, in comparison with barium swallow and UGIE, assuming intraoperative diagnosis as a standard of reference. Forty-one consecutive morbidly obese patients prospectively recruited from a tertiary-care referral hospital devoted to bariatric and metabolic surgery underwent a preoperative evaluation including standardized GERD questionnaires, barium swallow, UGIE, and HRM. The surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was blinded to the results of other investigations. HH was intraoperatively diagnosed in 11/41 patients (26.8%). In 10/11 patients, the preoperative HRM showed an esophagogastric junction suggestive of HH. When compared to intraoperative evaluation, the sensitivity of the HRM was 90.9% and the specificity 63.3%, with a positive predictive value of 47.6% and a negative predictive value of 95.0%. HRM showed a higher sensitivity and specificity compared to barium swallow and UGIE. HRM has a high accuracy of HH detection in morbidly obese patients assuming an intraoperative diagnosis as reference standard. It could therefore be a very useful tool in the preoperative work-up of obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.     

Comorbidity among the morbidly obese: a comparative study of 2002 U.S. hospital patient discharges.

BACKGROUND: Increased morbidity is associated with increasing severity of obesity. However, among morbidly obese patients, comorbid prevalence has been reported primarily in the bariatric surgical literature. This study compares demographic characteristics and selected comorbid conditions of morbidly obese patients discharged after surgical obesity procedures and morbidly obese patients discharged after all other hospital procedures. METHODS: The 2002 National Hospital Discharge Survey (a nationally representative sample of hospital discharge records) and the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification were used to identify and describe all morbidly obese patient discharges (n = 3,473) and to quantify the prevalence of selected obesity-related comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Compared with all other morbidly obese patients, the obesity surgery patients (n = 833) were younger (median, 42 vs 48 years; range, 17 to 67) and more female (82.3% vs. 63.7%), with higher rates of sleep apnea (24.0% vs. 11.8%), osteoarthritis (22.9% vs. 11.8%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (27.7% vs. 11.7%) (all P < .001). The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was lower in the obesity surgery patients (16.1% vs. 24.3%; P = .003), whereas the rates of hypertension (45.9% vs. 41.0%; P = .13) and asthma (9.6% vs. 12.0%; P = .26) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic characteristics and comorbid prevalence of morbidly obese patients discharged after obesity surgery are consistent with reports in the bariatric surgical literature. Obesity surgery patients had a higher prevalence of some comorbid conditions. Possible explanations for this include preferential diagnosis, differential diagnostic coding, or increased severity of morbid obesity. Advancing surgical and insurance guidelines for bariatric surgery will require clinical data that accurately describe and quantify the demographic distribution of obesity and the associated burden of disease.     

Comparison of Bariatric and Non-Bariatric Elective Operations in Morbidly Obese Patients on the Basis of Wound Infection

Background: Wound infection rates after various types of bariatric operations have been well described. The question of whether bariatric surgery increases wound infection rate compared with similar elective surgical procedures in obese patients has not been clearly answered. The purpose of this study was to investigate wound status of morbidly obese patients after elective general surgery. Methods: A prospective evaluation was conducted of 141 morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric (n=60) and non-bariatric elective general surgery operation of similar invasiveness (n=81) with the ASEPSIS wound surveillance method. Results: Median age of patients undergoing non-bariatric elective surgery (51, 32-68) was significantly higher than patients exposed to bariatric surgery (39, 24-57). Patients undergoing bariatric surgery had higher BMIs (44.0, 35-52.5) compared to the others (38.4, 35-43). All patients enrolled in the study were followed for a 21-day period. At the 7th postoperative day, 9 patients in the bariatric surgery group developed infection (15%), whereas 13 patients (16%) in the non-bariatric surgery group suffered wound infection. Wound infection was still present in 2 patients (3.4%) in the bariatric surgery group and 3 patients (3.7%) in the non-bariatric surgery group at the 21st day. Risk factors for wound infection included history of coronary artery diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory illness and malignant disease. Conclusion: Bariatric surgery does not cause an additional risk of postoperative wound infection in morbidly obese patients, compared to elective general surgical operations of the same invasiveness.