Adequate Access to Posthospital Home Health Services: Differences Between Urban and Rural Areas

The health care environment in rural areas changed dramatically in the 1980s. Policy-makers are concerned that these changes have reduced access to care among residents of rural areas. This study measures adequate access to Medicare home health services and determines whether it differs for urban and rural beneficiaries. Adequate access to care is measured by whether a patient with a specific health condition received a level of skilled services predetermined as appropriate for that condition. The predetermined levels of care were developed in an earlier study and were found to correlate with adverse outcomes. This study focused on patients with diabetes mellitus and surgical hip procedures to concentrate on access to skilled nursing services and physical therapy services. To conduct the analysis, a data base was constructed that included both patient utilization and health status data, drawing on three different data sources: Medicare hospital claims data, Medicare home health bill record data, and home health plan of treatment data from patients' utilization review forms (forms 485 and 486). The analysis samples consisted of 404 patients with diabetes and 876 patients who had surgical hip procedures. Significant differences were found between urban and rural areas in access to home health services. The largest differences were found in access to physical therapy services, but differences in access to skilled nursing services also exist. The data suggest that the availability of skilled care services may cause these differences.     

Medicare-Certified Home Health Care: Urban-Rural Differences in Utilization

CONTEXT: Availability of Medicare-certified home health care (HHC) to rural elders can prevent more expensive institutional care. To date, utilization of HHC by rural elders has not been studied in detail. PURPOSE: To examine urban-rural differences in Medicare HHC utilization. METHODS: The 2002 100% Medicare HHC claims and denominator files were used to estimate use of HHC and to make urban-rural comparisons on the basis of utilization levels within ZIP codes. FINDINGS: Overall, the proportion of Medicare beneficiaries living in areas with little HHC utilization is relatively low. Rural elders, however, are more likely than their urban counterparts to live in such areas. Less than 1% of urban beneficiaries live in ZIP codes with no or low use of HHC, but over 17% of the most rural beneficiaries live in such areas. CONCLUSIONS: Continued monitoring of rural HHC utilization and access is important, especially as Medicare seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of payment increases to rural home health agencies.     

Health services access and use among older adults in North Carolina: urban vs rural residents.

OBJECTIVES. This study compared health service use and satisfaction with health care among older adults living in urban vs rural counties in North Carolina. METHODS. A stratified random sample of 4162 residents of one urban and four rural counties of North Carolina was surveyed to determine urban/rural variation in inpatient and outpatient health service use, continuity of care and satisfaction with care, and barriers (transportation, cost) to care. RESULTS. Inpatient and outpatient service use did not vary by residence in controlled analyses. Continuity of care was more frequent in rural counties. Transportation was not perceived as a barrier to health care more frequently in rural than in urban counties, but cost was a greater barrier to care among rural elderly people. CONCLUSIONS. In this sample, older persons living in rural counties within reasonable driving distance of urban counties with major medical centers used health services as frequently and were as satisfied with their health care as persons in urban counties. Cost of care, however, was a significant and persistent barrier among rural elderly people, despite Medicare coverage.     

Veterans Health Administration and Medicare Outpatient Health Care Utilization by Older Rural and Urban New England Veterans

CONTEXT: Older veterans often use both the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Medicare to obtain health care services. PURPOSE: The authors sought to compare outpatient medical service utilization of Medicare-enrolled rural veterans with their urban counterparts in New England. METHODS: The authors combined VHA and Medicare databases and identified veterans who were age 65 and older and enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service plans, and they obtained records of all their VHA services in New England between 1997 and 1999. The authors used ZIP codes to designate rural or urban residence and categorized outpatient utilization into primary care, individual mental health care, non-mental health specialty care, or emergency room care. FINDINGS: Compared with their urban counterparts, veterans living in rural settings used significantly fewer VHA and Medicare-funded primary care, specialist care, and mental health care visits in all 3 years examined (P<.001 for all). Compared with urban veterans, veterans living in rural settings used fewer VHA emergency department services in 1998 and 1999 but more Medicare-funded emergency department visits in 1997. The authors found some evidence of substitution of Medicare for VHA emergency visits in rural veterans, but no other evidence of like-service substitution. Rural veterans were more reliant on Medicare for primary care and on VHA services for specialty and mental health care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that rural access to federally funded health care is restricted relative to urban access. Older veterans may choose different systems of care for different health care services. With poor access to primary care, rural veterans may substitute emergency room visits for routine care.     

Is access to home health care a problem in rural areas?

In 1987, urban Medicare beneficiaries were 13.7% more likely than their rural counterparts to use Medicare home health care services. Regression analysis shows that rural use rates, particularly those in sparsely populated areas, fall short of those in urban areas, other things being equal. Rural areas have lower Medicare ceilings, proportionately fewer visiting nurse associations, and lower availability of auxiliary services. These factors combined account for 82% of the difference between rural and urban use rates.     

Satisfaction with quality and access to health care among people with disabling conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To compare satisfaction with health care between persons with and without disabling conditions. DESIGN: Responses to 1996 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. SETTING: Nationally representative of the United States population. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries, older and younger than 65 years (n = 16 403). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adjusted odds of being dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with five general quality measures and five access-to-care measures by five disabling conditions (blind or low vision, deaf or hard of hearing, difficulty walking, difficulty reaching, manual dexterity difficulties). Multivariable logistic regressions on dissatisfaction adjusted for age group, sex, disabling condition, race, ethnicity, urban versus rural residence, education, household income < $25 000 versus > or = $25 000, having a usual source of care, proxy respondent, and managed care. RESULTS: Of an estimated 33.58 million non-institutionalized Medicare beneficiaries, 64.1% (estimated 21.51 million) reported at least one disabling condition. Among younger beneficiaries, 10.4% with any major disability were dissatisfied with their care overall, as were 4.6% without disabilities. Nevertheless, persons with disabilities generally had significantly higher adjusted odds of dissatisfaction. For elderly persons with any major disability, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of dissatisfaction were: 3.2 (2.4-4.3) for overall quality; 3.2 (2.2-4.6) for access to specialists; 4.4 (3.1-6.4) for follow-up; and 4.2 (3.1-5.7) for ease of getting to doctors. Elderly managed care enrollees were less satisfied with access to specialists, but more satisfied with costs. CONCLUSION: The quality domains generating the greatest dissatisfaction were anticipated, given the nature of disabling conditions. Improving these areas requires attention inside and outside the health care system. Redesigning practice settings and procedures, and changing payment policies offer the only solutions to some problems.     

Medicare dependent hospitals: who depends on whom?

Small rural hospitals with a large proportion of Medicare patients currently receive special treatment as Medicare dependent hospitals (MDHs) under the prospective payment system (PPS). Other high Medicare hospitals (HMHs)--both urban and rural--have sought to have the additional per case payments extended to them. Current utilization patterns, the availability of alternative facilities, and the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the service areas were examined to determine whether either the current MDH or alternative HMH targeting criteria identify hospitals whose closure might impair access to care for Medicare beneficiaries residing in their service areas. Neither MDHs nor HMHs are substantially different from other hospitals in terms of providing access. While some individual MDHs or HMHs might be considered essential access facilities, alternate criteria should be developed to identify these facilities regardless of the proportion of their patients attributable to the Medicare program.     

Access of rural AFDC Medicaid beneficiaries to mental health services

This article examines geographic differences in the use of mental health services among Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)-eligible Medicaid beneficiaries in Maine. Findings indicate that rural AFDC beneficiaries have significantly lower utilization of mental health services than urban beneficiaries. Specialty mental health providers account for the majority of ambulatory visits for both rural and urban beneficiaries. However, rural beneficiaries rely more on primary-care providers than do urban beneficiaries. Differences in use are largely explained by variations in the supply of specialty mental health providers. This finding supports the long-held assumption that lower supply is a barrier to access to mental health services in rural areas.     

Use and cost of short-stay hospital inpatient services under Medicare, 1988

In this article, data are presented on trends in the use of and program payments for inpatient short-stay hospital services to Medicare beneficiaries. The data on the services used by aged and disabled Medicare beneficiaries are presented for the years 1972 through 1988. The discussion is focused on trends in utilization and program payments resulting from the implementation of the Medicare prospective payment system. The State data for 1988 consist of utilization and program payment statistics by the residence of the beneficiaries in urban and rural areas. This is the first time that inpatient hospital data have been presented in this manner.     

Service Use of Rural and Urban Medicaid Beneficiaries Suffering From Depression: The Role of Supply

Despite the prevalence and consequence of depression in rural areas, the literature on treating depression in rural areas is relatively scarce and inconclusive. The use of mental health services by rural people suffering from depression and the role that supply may play in explaining these differences are not well understood. Understanding these issues for rural Medicaid beneficiaries is important as Medicaid managed carefor physical and behavioral health care is expanded to rural areas. This study compares the mental health service use of rural and urban Medicaid beneficiaries, ages 18 to 64, in Maine suffering from depression and examines what influence mental health and primary care supply have in explaining observed differences. Two models are used to estimate the use of ambulatory mental health services: (1) a logit likelihood estimate of whether a beneficiary uses any outpatient mental health services for depression; (2) an ordinary least squares regression estimating the number of annualized ambulatory mental health care visits among users. Rural beneficiaries suffering from depression have lower utilization than urban beneficiaries. Rural and urban Aid for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)--and Supplemental Security Income (SSI)--beneficiaries suffering from depression rely more on mental health than on general health care providers to receive ambulatory mental health care. Rural beneficiaries (AFDC and SSI) rely relatively more on general health care providers than urban beneficiaries. Multivariate analysis suggests that mental health supply and patient-level factors, but not primary care supply, account for utilization differences. This article describes the need to better understand factors limiting participation of primary care providers and to study the role of supply across multiple states.     

Hospital Choice of Medicare Beneficiaries in a Rural Market: Why Not the Closest?

As part of a larger study of hospital choice, the travel patterns of more than 12,000 Medicare beneficiaries residing in three overlapping rural areas were examined. During 1986 these Medicare beneficiaries were admitted to one of 53 hospitals in an area that encompassed parts of Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Information on ZIP code of residence, closest hospital, and hospital of admission were used to analyze hospital choices of the Medicare rural elderly residing in this area. To summarize their travel patterns, the admitting hospital was categorized based on whether it was urban or rural, its size and whether or not it was the closest facility. Findings indicated that 60 percent of these rural Medicare beneficiaries used hospital services at their closest rural hospital, regardless of its size. However, 79 percent of those whose closest hospital was larger than 75 beds used it, while only 54 percent of those whose closest rural hospital was fewer than 75 beds obtained services there. Overall, 30 percent of those residing in this rural market area went to an urban hospital. These patterns appeared to reflect an evaluation by the physician and/or individual of the relative attractiveness of the local hospital versus alternatives available, as well as the individual's characteristics. Travel patterns varied by the beneficiary's age as well as his or her relative complexity of illness, as measured by a Disease Staging methodology. Findings have implications for the provision and financing of hospital services in rural areas.     

PRICING DISTORTIONS IN MEDICARE'S PHYSICIAN FEE SCHEDULE AND PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH CARE QUALITY AND ACCESS

Medicare adjusts its payments to physicians for geographic differences in the cost of operating a medical practice, but the method it uses is imprecise. We measure the inaccuracy in its geographic adjustment factors and categorize beneficiaries by whether they live where Medicare's formula is favorable or unfavorable to physicians. Then, using the 2001–2003 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we examine whether differences in physician payment generosity, that is, whether favorable or unfavorable, influence the satisfaction ratings Medicare seniors assign to their quality of care and access to services. We find strong evidence that they do. Many beneficiaries live in payment‐unfavorable areas and receive a less satisfying quality of care and less satisfying access to services than beneficiaries who live where payments are favorable to physicians. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Distance, Use of Resources, and Mortality Among Rural Missouri Residents With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Prompt access to medical services is considered critical in managing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Several socioeconomic and geographic factors affect access to such care in rural areas. This study measured the effect of geographic distance from care on utilization of cardiovascular technology and death after AMI. The records of 1,658 rural Missouri residents age 65 or older with a discharge diagnosis of AMI in 1991 were obtained from Medicare data. The rate of use of cardiovascular technology and rate of post-AMI mortality for rural Missouri residents who live far from emergency departments and cardiac referral centers (CRC) were compared with those who live nearest such services. Those living 60 miles or more from a CRC were less likely to have cardiac catheterization (odds ratio [OR]=0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.40 to 0.75) or angioplasty (OR=0.68; 95% CI=0.47 to 0.98), compared with those living fewer than 30 miles from a CRC. There were no differences in 30-day, 90-day, or one-year mortality rates. After adjusting for distance to a CRC, those living 20 miles or more from emergency services were more likely to have coronary artery bypass grafting (OR=1.92; 95% CI=1.18 to 3.15) than those living fewer than 10 miles from such services, but there was no difference in mortality. Distance from services strongly predicts utilization of cardiovascular resources, but it does not predict mortality among rural Missouri Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with AMI.     

Choice of Personal Assistance Services Providers by Medicare Beneficiaries Using a Consumer-Directed Benefit: Rural-Urban Differences

Purpose: To examine the impact of an experimental consumer-choice voucher benefit on the selection of independent and agency personal assistance services (PAS) providers among rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities. Methods: The Medicare Primary and Consumer-Directed Care Demonstration enrolled 1,605 Medicare beneficiaries in 19 counties in New York State, West Virginia, and Ohio. A total of 839 participants were randomly assigned to receive a voucher benefit (up to $250 per month with a 20% copayment) that could be used toward PAS provided by either independent or agency workers. A bivariate probit model was used to estimate the probabilities of choosing either type of PAS provider while controlling for potential confounders. Findings: The voucher was associated with a 32.4% (P < .01) increase in the probability of choosing agency providers and a 12.5% (P= .03) increase in the likelihood of choosing independent workers. When the analysis was stratified by rural/urban status, rural voucher recipients had 36.8% higher probability of using independent workers compared to rural controls. Urban voucher recipients had 37.1% higher probability of using agency providers compared to urban controls. Conclusions: This study provided evidence that rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities may have very different responses to a consumer-choice PAS voucher program. Offering a consumer-choice voucher option to rural populations holds the potential to significantly improve their access to PAS.     

Disparities in End of Life Care for Elderly Lung Cancer Patients

The objective of this study was to examine geographic and race/ethnic disparities in access to end of life care among elderly patients with lung cancer. The study sample consisted of 91,039 Medicare beneficiaries with lung cancer who died in 2008. The key outcome measures included the number of emergency room visits, the number of inpatient admissions and the number of intensive care unit (ICU) days in the last 90 days of life, hospice care ever used and hospice enrollment within the last 3 days of life. Medicare beneficiaries with lung cancer residing in rural, remote rural, and micropolitan areas had more ER visits in the last 90 days of life as compared to urban residents. Urban residents however, had more ICU days in the last 90 days of life and were more likely to have ever used hospice as compared to residents of rural, remote rural and micropolitan counties. Racial minority lung cancer patients had more ICU days, ER visits and inpatient days than non-Hispanic White patients, and also were less likely to have ever used hospice care or be enrolled in hospice in the last 3 days of life. Lung cancer patients with very low socioeconomic status (SES) were less likely to ever use hospice or be enrolled in hospice care in the last 3 days of life, as compared to those who had very high SES. Geographic, racial and socioeconomic disparities in end of life care call for targeted efforts to address access barriers for these groups of patients.     

Effects of Managed Mental Health Care on Service Use in Urban and Rural Maine

This study takes advantage of a "natural experiment" resulting from the reassignment of all Maine state employees to a managed behavioral health plan in December 1992. By comparing mental health claims before and after that date, the effects of a behavioral health carve-out on mental health utilization by rural and urban beneficiaries were investigated. Following the implementation of the carve-out, the penetration rate, defined as the proportion of beneficiaries who sought help for an affective disorder, increased significantly in both rural and urban areas (P < 0.001). However, the rural penetration rate remained significantly lower than the urban rate (before implementation, 25.8 vs. 52.2 users per 1,000 enrollees, P < 0.001; after implementation, 57.8 vs. 85.8 users per 1,000 enrollees, P < 0.001). Similarly, rural utilization rates, defined as the average number of outpatient mental health visits per user, were significantly lower than urban rates both before and after implementation of the carve-out (before, 9.2 us. 12.9 visits per user, P < 0.001; after, 9.8 vs. 13.3 visits per user, P < 0.001). Before-after differences were not significant. In addition, the proportion of mental health care provided in the primary care setting increased after implementation of the carve-out (from 9.5 percent of all visits before to 12.6 percent of all visits after, P < 0.001). The increase in penetration rates can be attributed, in part, to a member education initiative undertaken during the transition from fee-for-service to managed care. This type of carve-out arrangement does not threaten to reduce access to mental health services, provided the managed behavioral health organization (MBHO) managing the carve-out is willing to accept primary care practitioners as part of its provider network.     

Oral Health Status of Children and Adolescents by Rural Residence, United States

CONTEXT: The limited information available on the oral health status of rural children in the United States makes it difficult to devise policy strategies to address perceived problems. PURPOSE: To document the oral health status and dental care utilization of US children by place of residence, METHODS: Data from National Health Interview Surveys for 1995, 1997, and 1998, and from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994) were analyzed. FINDINGS: Children residing in rural areas were more likely to be uninsured for dental care than were children from urban areas (41.1% versus 34.7%). A greater percentage of rural than urban children reported unmet dental needs (7.5% versus 5.6%); there was no difference in self-reported poor dental status. Urban children were more likely than rural children to have visited the dentist in the past year (73.6% versus 69.9%) and were also more likely to be regular users of dental care (61.7% versus 51.4%). Differences in percentage of rural and urban children with caries lesions and caries experience were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Children residing in rural areas have less access to and utilization of dental care compared to children residing in urban areas. Moreover, poor rural children display less utilization of dental services than poor urban children. Differences in the sum of decayed and filled primary teeth and the sum of decayed, missing, and filled permanent teeth were not significant.     

Patient satisfaction with health care services at a national institute of ophthalmology

Little is known about how patients in developing countries, such as Vietnam, are satisfied with eye care services. The purpose of this study was to assess the satisfaction with health services and its associated factors among patients attending a national institute of ophthalmology in Vietnam. In a cross‐sectional study utilizing quantitative methods, 500 inpatients and their relatives attending a national institute of ophthalmology in Vietnam were approached for data collection. The results indicated that under 50% of the patients were satisfied with eye care services. However, when classified by level of satisfaction, only 6.8% were very satisfied with all domains of care. There was no significant difference in satisfaction by gender and income, while significant differences by department, residence, and education were found. Patients who were from rural areas, were better educated, and used the services of the glaucoma department, were more satisfied with eye care than those from urban areas, were less educated, and used the services of treatment‐on‐demand department. Multivariable regression detected 2 main factors, gender and location, associated with patient satisfaction. Patients who were female and came from rural and remote areas were more likely to be satisfied than patients who were male and living in urban areas. The study suggests that to continue to improve health care quality, it is important to eliminate differences in providing eye care services regardless of whether patients are male or female, and whether they come from a rural or urban area.     

Systematic Review of Rural and Urban Differences in Care Provided by Home Health Agencies in the United States

ObjectiveHome health care agencies (HHAs) are skilled care providers for Medicare home health beneficiaries in the United States. Rural HHAs face different challenges from their urban counterparts in delivering care (eg, longer distances to travel to patient homes leading to higher fuel/travel costs and fewer number of visits in a day, impacting the quality of home health care for rural beneficiaries). We review evidence on differences in care outcomes provided by urban and rural HHAs.DesignSystematic review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality appraisal.SettingCare provided by urban and rural HHAs.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search for English-language peer-reviewed articles after 2010 on differences in urban and rural care provided by U.S. HHAs. We screened 876 studies, conducted full-text abstraction and NOS quality review on 36 articles and excluded 2 for poor study quality.ResultsTwelve studies were included; 7 focused on patient-level analyses and 5 were HHA-level. Nine studies were cross-sectional and 3 used cohorts. Urban and rural differences were measured primarily using a binary variable. All studies controlled for agency-level characteristics, and two-thirds also controlled for patient characteristics. Rural beneficiaries, compared with urban, had lower home health care utilization (4 of 5 studies) and fewer visits for physical therapy and/or rehabilitation (3 of 5 studies). Rural agencies had lower quality of HHA services (3 of 4 studies). Rural patients, compared with urban, visited the emergency room more often (2 of 2 studies) and were more likely to be hospitalized (2 of 2 studies), whereas urban patients with heart failure were more likely to have 30-day preventable hospitalizations (1 study).Conclusion and ImplicationsThis review highlights similar urban/rural disparities in home health care quality and utilization as identified in previous decades. Variables used to measure the access to and quality of care by HHAs varied, so consensus was limited. Articles that used more granular measures of rurality (rather than binary measures) revealed additional differences. These findings point to the need for consistent and refined measures of rurality in studies examining urban and rural differences in care from HHAs.