Mattress cleanliness: the role of monitoring and maintenance

A clean and tidy environment provides the right setting for good patient care. It is fundamental in preventing and/or controlling the spread of healthcare-associated infections (HCAI). Cleanliness is an essential component for the comfort and dignity of patients, particularly those for whom a hospital is home for any length of time. Patients spend a lot of their time in bed so it is important for them to be provided with well maintained and clean mattresses. Beds, and especially the mattresses, should be cleaned and inspected regularly so patients know they are being cared for in a clean and safe environment. To prolong the life of the mattress and reduce infection risks, inspections for damage and contamination must take place on a regular basis. Assessment criteria for the audit of a mattress can include a visual inspection, a cover permeability test and a foam support surface test. These assessments will ensure the mattress is compliant with current standards and identify whether or not they require condemning. Mattress care can be improved by adopting unified good practices that can be standardized and audited regularly.     

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Thermo contour mattress

Use of air mattresses in reduction of pressure sore incidence is an important part of quality patient care. However, there will never be enough air mattresses to match the demand as increased education and an increase in the general provision of air mattresses can lead to an unrealistic expectation of obtaining air mattresses when required for patients. This raises the demand for air mattresses and increases costs within hospital trusts. This study examined a way to redress the balance through use of an alternative, cost-effective type of mattress (thermoelastic polymer) in the prevention of pressure sores. Prime consideration was given to the comfort of the patient. The claims of the manufacturers, Barrington Healthcare, that 'patients with Waterlow scores of 23 can be nursed safely on this product' were explored as part of the study. A total of 407 patients took part over a 6-month period. Twenty-four Thermo contour mattresses were loaned to one ward for the study and patients were allocated to the mattress through admission to the experimental ward. Patients were then split into two groups on two wards. Group B were allocated to a Thermo contour mattress and group A were nursed on air mattresses and foam mattresses generally used throughout the trust. Results showed that more patients were comfortable on the Thermo contour mattresses than on all other mattresses. Patients with Waterlow scores under 25 did not develop pressure sores on the Thermo contour mattress. However, the sample of patients with a Waterlow score of between 20 and 25 was small and therefore further research is required.     

Transfoam Visco: evaluation of a viscoelastic foam mattress

It is both a massive financial commitment and a huge financial decision to standardize mattresses in a large trust. It should only be undertaken after evaluation of the evidence of efficacy supplied by relevant companies, together with independent research and reports by healthcare professionals. In addition, evaluation of the equipment should be made by back care advisers, from a user-safety viewpoint and physiotherapists, occupational therapists concerning rehabilitation. Ward-based nurses and patients need to assess equipment for comfort, ease of repositioning individual, and ability to relieve pressure. This article outlines the process by which a static mattress was evaluated for ease of movement, pressure relief and comfort by patients and healthcare professionals. The possible longevity of the mattress was considered as secondary relevance; however, cost-effectiveness and quality of product are essential in today's acute healthcare setting.     

Preventing pressure ulcers: an evaluation of four operating-table mattresses.

Pressure is a major factor in the development of pressure ulcers. This research focused on assessing the pressure-reducing effects of operating-table mattresses. Five mattresses were tested: a standard operating-table mattress, a foam mattress, a gel mattress, a visco-elastic polyether mattress, and a visco-elastic polyurethane mattress. Four intraoperative postures were evaluated: supine, lateral, fossa, and the Miles-Pauchet position. Interface pressure measurements were performed on 36 healthy volunteers. The foam mattress and the gel mattress seem to have little or no pressure-reducing effect; the polyurethane mattress and the polyether mattress reduce interface pressure significantly better (p < .001); but none of the mattresses reduce pressure sufficiently to prevent the occurrence of pressure ulcers.     

Reducing pressure ulcer incidence in a long-term setting

Selection of appropriate pressure prevention equipment relies on risk assessment and clinical assessment of the resident/patient. Decisions are then made in combination with manufacturer's recommendations, such as interface pressure testing. However, risk assessments can over-predict and laboratory investigations do not necessarily provide an accurate picture of how individual patients will react to pressures from support services. There are few studies on visco-elastic mattresses and their benefits in reducing pressure ulcer incidence. Therefore, a small study was undertaken to review the efficacy of a pressure-reducing visco-elastic foam mattress. For the benefit of the study, a 20-bedded nursing home was provided with 20 visco-elastic mattresses (Pressurease) and 20 pressure-reducing cushions (Mediform Visco). The study aimed to demonstrate a reduction in pressure ulcer prevalence. The study involved 21 residents over a 6-month period. There was a 58.3% prevalence (of Stirling grade 1-2 pressure damage) at trial initiation. The results showed an 85.7% decrease of pressure ulcers within 4 weeks, and an overall decrease of 82.5% over the 6-month period. Comfort levels, scored by residents on a visual analogue scale, demonstrated the Pressurease mattress to be superior to the nursing home standard mattress.     

Respiratory effects of spinal immobillzatlon

Objective. To evaluate the effect of whole-body spinal immobilization on respiration. Methods. This was a randomized, crossover laboratory study with 39 human volunteer subjects (20 males; 19 females) ranging in age from 7 to 85 years. Respiratory function was measured three times: at baseline (seated or lying), immobilized with a Philadelphia collar on a hard wooden backboard, and on a Scandinavian vacuum mattress with a vacuum collar. The comfort levels of each of the two methods were assessed on a forced Likert scale. Results. Both immobilization methods restricted respiration, 15% on the average. The effects were similar under the two immobilization conditions, although the FEV, was lower on the vacuum mattress. Respiratory restriction was more pronounced at the extremes of age. The vacuum mattress was significantly more comfortable. Conclusion. This study confirmed the previously reported respiratory restriction caused by spinal immobilization. Vacuum mattresses are more comfortable than wooden backboards.     

A Phantom-Based Method to Assess X-Ray Table Mattress Interface Pressures

BackgroundPressure redistribution performance of x-ray table mattresses can influence the development of pressure ulcers in at-risk populations. Interface pressure analysis, with human participants, is a common method to assess mattresses. This approach has limitations that relate to the lack of standardisation between and within humans.AimThis study aimed to develop and validate an anthropomorphic phantom-based method to assess x-ray table mattress interface pressures as an index of mattress performance.MethodsA three dimensional phantom simulating an adult’s head, pelvis, and heels was printed from x-ray computed tomography image data and attached to a metal frame 175 cm in length. Dry sand was added to the phantom head, pelvis, and heels to represent a range of human weights. Pressure distribution was assessed using XSensor. Phantom validation was achieved by comparing phantom mattress interface pressure characteristics, for five human equivalent weights, against 27 sets of human mattress interface pressure data.ResultsUsing the correlation coefficient R, phantom and human pressure data showed good correlation for the five phantom weights (R values: head = 0.993, pelvis = 0.997, and heels = 0.996).ConclusionA novel method to test x-ray mattresses for interface pressure was developed and validated. The method could have utility in the testing of x-ray mattresses that are in routine use and for new mattress development. Phantom interface pressure data could be provided by manufacturers to help inform procurement decisions when matching mattress characteristics to medical imaging demands and the underlying patient populations.     

Alternating pressure air mattresses as prevention for pressure ulcers: a literature review

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper is to examine and synthesise the literature on alternating pressure air mattresses (APAMs) as a preventive measure for pressure ulcers. DESIGN: Literature review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cinahl, Central, Embase, and Medline databases were searched to identify original and relevant articles. Additional publications were retrieved from the references cited in the publications identified during the electronic database search. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included. Effectiveness and comfort of APAMs were the main focuses of the studies evaluating APAMs. Pressure ulcer incidence, contact interface pressure, and blood perfusion were the most frequently used outcome measures to evaluate the effectiveness of APAMs. Fifteen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysed the pressure ulcer incidence. One RCT compared a standard hospital mattress with an APAM and found that the APAM was a more effective preventive measure. RCTs comparing APAMs with constant-low-air mattresses resulted in conflicting evidence. There was also no clear evidence as to which type of APAM performed better. All RCTs had methodological flaws. The use of contact interface pressure and blood perfusion measurements to evaluate the effectiveness of APAMs is questionable. Comfort of APAMs was the primary outcome measure in only four studies. Different methods for assessment were used and different types of APAMs were evaluated. Better measures for comfort are needed. A few studies discussed technical problems associated with APAMs. Educating nurses in the correct use of APAMs is advisable. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the methodological issues, we can conclude that APAMs are likely to be more effective than standard hospital mattresses. Contact interface pressure and blood perfusion give only a hypothetical conclusion about APAMs' effectiveness. Additional large, high-quality RCTs are needed. No conclusions can be drawn regarding the comfort of APAMs. A number of technical problems associated with APAMs are related to nurses' improper use of the devices.     

The Theracute alternating pressure replacement mattress

The use of alternating pressure mattresses is still acknowledged as an effective adjunct in the prevention and treatment of pressure damage; however, with the plethora of equipment now available, there is an increasing need to provide information that supports the practitioners' decisions ensuring individual patients' clinical needs are met. This article reviews a new addition to the Talley Medical range of alternating pressure mattresses, the Theracute mattress replacement system.     

The impact of compliant surfaces on in-hospital chest compressions: Effects of common mattresses and a backboard

PurposeTo evaluate, in a hospital setting, the influence of different, common mattresses, with and without a backboard, on chest movement during CPR.Design and settingSixty CPR sessions (140 s each, 30:2, C:R ratio 1:1) were performed using a manikin on standard hospital mattresses, with or without a backboard in combination with variable weights. Sternum-to-spine compression distance was controlled (range 30–60 mm) allowing evaluation of the underlying compliant surface on total hand travel.ResultsMovement of the caregiver's hands was significantly larger (up to 111 mm at 50 mm compression depth, p < 0.0001) when sternum-to-spine compressions were performed without a backboard than with one. The extent of this variable extra travel effect depended on the type of mattress as well as the force of compression. Foam mattresses and air chamber systems act as springs and follow hand movement, while ‘slow foam’ mattresses incorporate time delays, making depth and force sensing harder. A backboard decreases the extra hand movement due to mattress effects by more than 50%, strongly reducing caregiver work.ConclusionsTotal vertical hand movement is significantly, and clinically relevantly, much larger than sternum-to-spine compression depth when CPR is performed on a mattress. Additional movement depends on the type of mattress and can be strongly reduced, but not eliminated, when a backboard is applied. The additional motion and increased work load adds extra complexity to in-hospital CPR. We propose that this should be taken into account during training by in-hospital caregivers.     

A comparison of mite populations in mattress dust from hospital and from private houses in Cardiff, Wales.

Fifty mattress dust samples from private houses were examined--all were mite infested. Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus occurred in all samples and accounted for 81% of all mites. In thirty-two paired samples the total mite population of bedroom floor dust was only 10% of that found in the corresponding mattress dust. D. pteronyssinus was the dominant species in both and the population of this mite amounted to 7-5% of that found in the mattress dust. An analysis of mattress dust from 100 hospital beds showed that ninety-four mattresses were mite free; the other six contained only seven mites, all D. pteronyssinus. It is suggested that frequent changing and washing of bed linen and brushing and cleaning of mattresses were the main factors in preventing mite infestation in the Cardiff hospitals.     

Forensic analysis of crib mattress properties on pediatric CPR quality—Can we balance pressure reduction with CPR effectiveness?

Introduction

Single mode, pressure reduction (PR) crib mattresses are increasingly employed in hospitals to prevent skin injury and infection. However, single mode PR mattresses risk large mattress deflection during CPR chest compressions, potentially leading to inadequate chest compressions.

Hypothesis

New, dual mode PR crib mattress technology provides less mattress deflection during chest compressions (CCs) with similar PR characteristics for prevention of skin injury.

Methods

Epochs of 50 high-quality CCs (target sternum–spine compression depth ≥38 mm) guided by real-time force/deflection sensor (FDS) feedback were delivered to CPR manikin with realistic CC characteristics on two PR crib mattresses for four conditions: (1) single mode + backboard; (2) dual mode + backboard; (3) single mode − no backboard; and (4) dual mode − no backboard. Mattress displacement was measured using surface reference accelerometers. Mattress displacement ≥5 mm was prospectively defined as minimal clinically important difference. PR qualities of both mattresses were assessed by tissue interface pressure mapping.

Results

During simulated high quality CC, single mode had significantly more mattress displacement compared to dual mode (mean difference 16.5 ± 1.4 mm, p < 0.0001) with backboard. This difference was greater when no backboard was used (mean difference 31.7 ± 1.5 mm, p < 0.0001). Both single mode and dual mode met PR industry guidelines (mean surface pressure <50 mmHg).

Conclusions

Chest compressions delivered on dual mode pressure reduction crib mattresses resulted in substantially smaller mattress deflection compared to single mode pressure reduction mattresses. Skin pressure reduction qualities of dual mode pressure reduction crib mattress were maintained. We recommend that backboards continue to be used in order to mitigate mattress deflection during CPR on soft mattresses.     

Special mattresses: effectiveness in preventing decubitus ulcers in chronic neurologic patients

Thirty-two chronic neurologic patients between 19 and 60 years of age were randomly assigned, for a period of three months, to either an alternating air mattress or a silicore mattress to test the preventive qualities of special mattresses in the occurrence of decubitus ulcers. The two groups were comparable on the variables of age, weight, diagnoses, history of disease process, history of being wheelchair bound, history of previous pressures, and mean scores on Norton's scale of risk, which is based on the subject's physical condition, mental alertness, ambulation, mobility and incontinence. No significant differences were observed in the preventive qualities of the two types of special mattresses in terms of the incidence, location, severity, or healing duration of the subjects' decubitus ulcers. Improved studies of common special mattresses are suggested.     

Preventing pressure ulcers: choosing a mattress

The standard hospital mattress is not suitable for patients at risk of developing pressure ulcers. The type of mattress or overlay system they require will depend on their pressure ulcer risk, medical history and local practice. This article provides a guide to pressure-relieving mattresses.     

MEASUREMENTS OF INTERFACE PRESSURE BETWEEN BODY SITES AND THE SURFACES OF FOUR SPECIALISED AIR MATTRESSES

SUMMARY Four specialised air mattresses had interface pressure measured under six body sites prone to pressure sores in 10 subjects, supine and sitting. The mattresses were the Clinirest (SSI) and FirstStep (KCI) continuous airflow mattress overlays, and Airwave (Pegasus) and Nimbus (Huntleigh) alternating pressure air mattresses. On the mattress overlays, average supine interface pressures were 2.33 kPa (scapula), 4.15 kPa (elbow), 1.94 kPa (sacrum) and 2.79 kPa (buttock), although they were higher at the occiput (7.97 kPa) and heel (11.7 kPa). The alternating pressure air mattresses had an average minimum interface pressure close to zero for three sites, rising to 4.28 kPa under the heel. Average maximum interface pressures were 8.61 kPa (occiput), 5.21 kPa (scapula), 4.90 (elbow), 4.85 kPa (sacrum), 4.61 kPa (buttock) and 13.2 kPa (heel). No accepted scientific method exists for comparing the two types of mattress. Our data suggest a clinical benefit at the occiput and heel (supine) in using an alternating pressure air mattress and a benefit in using a continuous airflow mattress overlay at other sites.     

Associations between back pain,quality of sleep and quality of mattresses. Double-blind pilot study with hotel guests

BACKGROUND: Associations between back pain, the quality of sleep and the quality of mattress have not yet been investigated systematically. METHODS: At check-out we asked 265 consecutive guests of a trade fair hotel about the subjective quality of sleep in the previous night. Nine rooms had been equipped with new mattresses of three different qualities and prices, but this was kept blind to the hotel staff and the guests. Sleep quality was assessed on an analog scale between 1 (very good) and 5 (very bad) and was analyzed in comparison to the remaining 8-year old mattresses of the hotel, but also with respect to social (e.g. private vs. professional reason for the stay) as well as personal (e.g. previous experience with low back and sleep complaints) characteristics of the guests. RESULTS: The three qualities of the mattresses correlated significantly and positively with the perceived quality of sleep, but the difference to the "old" mattresses was most pronounced for those guests who were staying overnight for professional reasons, or who frequently were suffering from low back pain or sleep disturbances. CONCLUSION: At least for chronic sufferers from back pain and sleep problems, the association between sleep quality and quality of the mattress is significant.     

Do different mattresses affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Objective To determine the effect of different mattresses on cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance and establish whether emergency deflation of an inflatable mattress improves the quality of resuscitation.Design and setting Randomised controlled cross-over trial performed in a general ICUParticipants Critical care staff from a general ICU.Interventions Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a manikin on the floor or on a bed with a standard foam mattress and inflated and deflated pressure redistributing mattresses. Maximal compression force was measured at different bed heights.Measurements and results Compression depth, duty cycle and rate and percentage correct expired air ventilation were recorded on a manikin. Compression depth was significantly lower on the foam (35.2 mm), inflated (37.2 mm) and deflated mattress (39.1 mm) than the floor (44.2 mm). There were no clinically important differences in duty cycle or compression rate. The quality of ventilation was poor on all surfaces. Maximal compression force declined as bed height increased.Conclusions Resuscitation performance is adversely affected when performed on a bed (irrespective of mattress type) compared to the floor. There were no differences between the inflated and deflated mattresses, although the deflation process did not adversely affect performance. This study does not support the routine deflation of an inflated mattress during resuscitation and questions the potential benefits from using a backboard. The finding that bed height affects maximal compression forces, challenges the recommendation that cardiopulmonary resuscitation be performed with the bed at middle-thigh level and requires further investigation.Dr. Robert Benny was tragically killed in a road accident during the Summer of 2003. Dr. Benny was at the very start of a promising career in surgery. Our thoughts go to his family and friends.G.D.P. and M.T. have received travelling fellowships from Huntleigh Healthcare, and M.T. has previously delivered lectures for Huntleigh Healthcare.     

Paraplegic Body-Support Pressure on Convoluted Foam,Waterbed, and Standard Mattresses

Comparisons were made between body-support pressures obtained when 15 male paraplegics laid on waterbed, foam, and standard mattresses. The variables examined were mattress, bone prominence, and time. The major findings were that the waterbed, in comparisons with the other mattresses, yielded significantly lower occipital, scapular, and sacral pressures at 5, 20, and 35 minutes.     

Egg crater mattresses: a deposit of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microbiological conditions of the egg crater mattress in hospital use to identify the presence of Staphylococcus aureus and its methicillin-resistance phenotype (MRSA). Petrifilm plates were used to collect the microbiological data from the mattresses, in pre-established positions. A total 180 plates were collected in 15 mattresses, 139 (72.2%) of which were positive for Staphylococcus aureus. Of the positive plates, 77 (55.4%) were collected before and 62 (44.6%) after washing the mattresses. There was a significant reduction (p=0.023) in Colony Forming Units (CFU); however, regarding the resistance profile, 8 (53.3%) mattresses with MRSA were identified. Results show the risk of these mattresses acting as a secondary deposit in the infection chain, especially regarding the presence of MRSA.     

The QUATTRO ACUTE mattress and pressure ulcer prevention

There are a plethora of mattresses on the market and nurses are not always sure which mattress to select for each individual patient. This article outlines the issues in preventing and understanding pressure ulcers and the performance of the QUATTRO ACUTE trade mark mattress, manufactured by Talley Medical.