首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
AIM: To prospectively evaluate efficacy and tolerance of the 5-fluorouracil + folinic acid + cisplatin (LV5FU2-P) combination in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1998 and June 2000, 35 patients, mean age 61 years (37-75), with advanced (n=2) or metastatic (n=33) pancreatic cancer and initial performance status (WHO) of 0 (n=9), 1 (n=14) or 2 (n=12) were enrolled in the study. Two consecutive groups of patients were treated twice monthly, the first group (n=19) received the LV5FU2 regimen: a 2 hour-infusion of leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2), followed by 22-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on 2 consecutive days and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2. The second group (n=16) received a simplified schedule with bolus leucovorin 40 mg/m(2), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) 48-hour infusion and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2. Clinical symptoms and performance status were monitored together with weight changes. Tumor assessment was performed every 2 months. RESULTS: Three patients (9%) exhibited grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 toxicity occurred in 31% of the patients (neutropenia: n=3, thrombocytopenia: n=1, vomiting: n=3, mucositis: n=3, diarrhea: n=1). There were no treatment-related deaths. Objective response was observed in 10 patients (29%, 95% confidence interval: 20-40%) including one complete response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.5 and 9 months, respectively. Six-months and 1-year survival rates were 70% and 25%, respectively. Weight gain was observed in 40% of the patients and performance status improved in 50%. CONCLUSION: LV5FU2-P regimen is active and well tolerated. It should be compared to gemcitabine as a first line therapy in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.  相似文献   

2.
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a dismal disease. Few drugs, including gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have notable antitumor effects against advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of the present study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU and the efficacy and toxicity profile of weekly gemcitabine plus infusional 5-FU/leucovorin in advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with histo-/cytologically confirmed, advanced pancreatic cancer were eligible. Treatment consisted of a 30-min infusion of gemcitabine (800 mg/m2), followed by a 24-h infusion of 5-FU and leucovorin (300 mg/m2) at day 1, day 8 and day 15 every 28 days, and was termed the GemFL24 regimen. The dose of 5-FU was escalated from 1600, 2000, to 2600 mg/m2 in the phase I study, and fixed MTD for subsequent enrolled patients. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled in the phase I study, and 24 in phase II. The MTD of 5-FU was 2000 mg/m2, with major dose-limiting toxicities being febrile neutropenia and delayed recovery from neutropenia. The dose intensity of gemcitabine of the 35 patients with 5-FU dosage set at MTD was 593 mg/m2 per week. In the entire series of 42 patients, myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with grade 3 neutropenia in eight patients, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in six. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall and clinical benefit response rates were 22% and 46%, respectively; with median progression-free and overall survival of 4.1 and 6.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GemFL24 regimen is a feasible and moderately active treatment with manageable toxicities for advanced pancreatic cancer, and could be a basis for further combination with other anticancer drugs.  相似文献   

3.
AIM: FOLFUGEM 1 (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 combined with 5-flurorouracil (FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 then 5-FU 2-3 g/m2/46 hours and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 30 min) in patients with locally-advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma appeared to be toxic (neutropenia and alopecia). The aims of this phase II multicentric study were to evaluate the response rate, clinical benefit and tolerance of a new scheme of combined leucovorin, 5-FU and gemcitabine (FOLFUGEM 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: FOLFUGEM 2 associated leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in 2 hours followed by 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 in 22 hours, then gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 (10 mg/m2/min) with cycles every 14 days. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (1000 then 1250 mg/m2) when NCI/CTC toxicity was < or = grade 2. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (locally-advanced tumor: N = 13 and metastatic: N = 45). Among the 39 patients with measurable disease, 11 had partial response (28.2%, 95% confidence interval: 14-42%) and 11 had stable disease (28.2%). On an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 19% (95% confidence interval: 9-29%). Clinical benefit rate was 46%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.1 and 7.2 months, respectively. There were 13% grade 3-4 neutropenia and 36% complete alopecia. CONCLUSION: FOLFUGEM 2 schema has an antitumoral effect in advanced pancreatic cancer and has an acceptable toxicity which appears to be less than that of FOLFUGEM 1.  相似文献   

4.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sequential administration with methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (sequential MTX/5-FU) has synergistic cytotoxic activity for several malignant diseases, but its activity in pancreatic cancer has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of sequential MTX/5-FU in metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODOLOGY: All patients were required to have a pathologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with measurable metastatic lesions, and no prior chemotherapy. Sequential MTX/5-FU was administered weekly as followed; MTX 100 mg/m2 intravenous bolus infusion was given, followed 3 h later by 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenous infusion over 30 min. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled and assessable for response and toxicity. There were no complete responses, 4 partial responses, 10 no change and 17 progressive disease. The response rate was 12.9% (95% confidence interval: 1.1-24.7%) and the duration of response was 7.1 months (range: 5.5-9.1 months). The median survival was 4.0 months. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, although grade 3-4 toxicities such as neutropenia and diarrhea were seen infrequently. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential MTX/5-FU had marginal antitumor activity with mild toxicity against metastatic pancreatic cancer.  相似文献   

5.
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the elderly. Information on tolerability and efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in such patients is limited. Primary aim of the study was to describe tolerability and activity of chemotherapy with the "de Gramont" schedule (FU bolus [400 mg/m ] + FU continuous infusion [600 mg/m ] + folinic acid [100 mg/m ] on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks), in patients with advanced colorectal cancer aged 70 or older. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 70 or more, with stage IV colorectal cancer, ECOG performance status not worse than 2. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were treated at two participating centers. Seven (20.6%, 95% exact CI = 8.7-37.9) had an objective response, complete in 3 and partial in 4 patients. Five cases of unacceptable toxicity were registered (2 cardiac, 1 each for liver, anemia and diarrhea). Fitting the statistical model to the observed data indicated that the treatment was sufficiently active and tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The de Gramont scheme is active and tolerated in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.  相似文献   

6.
《Pancreatology》2020,20(7):1519-1525
BackgroundData on FOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer are limited. In the JASPAC06 study—a nationwide, multicenter, observational study—FOLFIRINOX for patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer as any line of treatment showed favorable efficacy and safety in Japanese clinical practice.MethodsWe performed exploratory analyses of patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer who received FOLFIRINOX as the second-line chemotherapy in Japanese clinical settings.ResultsOf the 399 evaluable patients, 44 were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The patients’ characteristics were as follows: median age, 62 years; men, 26 (59%); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance status 0/1, 30 (68%)/14 (32%); disease status, recurrent/local/metastatic: 4 (9%)/8 (18%)/32 (73%). The initial dose was reduced in 28 (64%) patients. The median time to treatment failure and number of cycles were 4.5 (range, 0.2–19.1) months and 6 cycles (range, 1–13 or more), respectively. The major grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia in 29 (66%), leucopenia in 17 (39%), anorexia in 7 (16%), febrile neutropenia in 5 (11%), and anemia in 5 (11%) patients. The median overall survival, progression-free survival, and 1-year survival rates were 10.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2–13.3), 4.1 (95% CI, 2.6–5.5) months, and 30%, respectively.ConclusionOur findings suggest that FOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer was effective in patients with a good performance status. It displayed toxicity similar to that observed with its use as a first-line treatment.  相似文献   

7.
AIM: To evaluate the combination of bevacizumab with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) pretreated with combination regimens including irinotecan and oxaliplatin. METHODS: Fourteen patients (median age 56 years) with advanced CRC, all having progressed after oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based combination chemotherapy, were enrolled in this study. Patients were treated with 2 h infusion of irinotecan 150 mg/m2 on d 1, plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg iv infusion for 90 min on d 2, and iv injection of LV 20 mg/m2 followed by a bolus of 5-FU 400 mg/m2 and then 22 h continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 given on two consecutive days every 14 d. RESULTS: The median number of cycles of chemotherapy was six (range 3-12). The response rate was 28.5%, one patient had a complete response, and three patients had a partial response. Eight patients had stable disease. The median time to progression was 3.9 mo (95% CI 2.0-8.7), and the median overall survival was 10.9 mo (95% CI 9.6-12.1). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in five patients, and two of these developed neutropenic fever. Grade 3 hematuria and hematochezia occurred in one. Grade 2 proteinuria occurred in two patients. However, hypertension, bowel perforation or thromboembolic events did not occur in a total of 90 cycles. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab with FOLFIRI is well tolerated and a feasible treatment in patients with heavily treated advanced CRC.  相似文献   

8.
AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab treatment outcome as second-line treatment for metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.METHODS:Thirteen consecutive patients with metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who were refractory tofirst-line therapy consisting of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatinbased first-line chemotherapy given intravenously via intra-arterial infusion were treated with FOLFIRI[irinotecan(180 mg/m2 i.v.over 90 min)concurrently with folinic acid(400 mg/m2 i.v.over 120 min)followed by fluorouracil(400 mg/m2 i.v.bolus)then fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 intravenous infusion over 46 h]and bevacizumab(5mg/kg)every 2 wk.Tumor response was evaluated by computed tomography scan every 4 cycles.RESULTS:The best tumor responses using response evaluation criteria in solid tumor criteria were:complete response for 1 patient,partial response for 4 patients,and stable disease for 6 patients after 6 mo of follow-up.The response rate was 38.4%(95%CI:12.5-89)and the disease control rate was 84.5%(95%CI:42-100).Seven deaths occurred at the time of analysis,progression free survival was 8 mo(95%CI:7-16),and median overall survival was 20 mo(95%CI:8-48).No grade 4toxic events were observed.Four grade 3 hematological toxicities and one grade 3 digestive toxicity occurred.An adaptive reduction in chemotherapy dosage was required in 2 patients due to hematological toxicity,and a delay in chemotherapy cycles was required for 3 patients.CONCLUSION:FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab combination treatment showed promising efficacy and safety as second-line treatment for metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after failure of the first-line treatment of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin chemotherapy.  相似文献   

9.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin of a triplet regimen consisting of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and infusional fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (GOFL) for advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven metastatic or unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were eligible to take part in the study. The treatment consisted of fixed-rate infusion (10 mg/m2/minute) of 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine followed by 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin and then 48-h infusion of 5-FU/LV day 1 and day 15 every 4 weeks. The oxaliplatin would be evaluated at three dose levels, 65, 75 and 85 mg/m2. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were enrolled at three dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicity of neutropenic fever and grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in one of each six patients at oxaliplatin dose level of 65 mg/m2 and 85 mg/m2, respectively. The MTD of oxaliplatin for this combination was 85 mg/m2. After a median four cycles of treatment, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 46.7% of patients and thrombocytopenia in 13.3%. Non-hematological toxicities were generally of grade 1/2. Objective tumor response was observed in five patients (33.3%, 95% confidence interval, 6.3-60.4%). CONCLUSION: Biweekly GOFL is a feasible regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer. For further phase II studies, the recommended dose of oxaliplatin is 85 mg/m2.  相似文献   

10.
AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of postopera-tive chemoradiation using FP chemotherapy and oralcapecitabine during radiation for advanced gastric cancerfollowing curative resection.METHODS:Thirty-one patients who had underwent apotentially curative resection for Stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ(MO)gastric cancer were enrolled.Therapy consists of onecycle of FP(continuous infusion of 5-FU 1000 mg/m~2on d 1 to 5 and cisplatin 60 mg/m~2 on d 1)followed by4500 cGy(180 cGy/d)with capecitabine(1650 mg/m~2daily throughout radiotherapy).Four wk after completionof the radiotherapy,patients received three additionalcycles of FP every three wk.The median follow-up dura-tion was 22.2 mo.RESULTS:The 3-year disease free and overall survivalin this study were 82.7% and 83.4%,respectively.Fourpatients(12.9%)showed relapse during follow-up.Eightpatients did not complete all planned adjuvant therapy.Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia in 50.2%,ane-mia in 12.9%,thrombocytopenia in 3.2% and nausea/vomiting in 3.2%.Neither grade 3/4 hand foot syndromenor treatment related febrile neutropenia or death wereobserved.CONCLUSION:These preliminary results suggest thatthis postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation regimen ofFP before and after capecitabine and concurrent radio-therapy appears well tolerated and offers a comparable toxicity profile to the chemoradiation regimen utilized inINT-0116.This treatment modality allowed successfulloco-regional control rate and 3-year overall survival.  相似文献   

11.
This trial was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, principal toxicity, and recommended dose (RD) for the phase II study of the combination of nedaplatin (NED), adriamycin (ADM), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Patients with previously untreated esophageal cancer were eligible if they had performance status 0-1, were 75 years or younger and had adequate organ function. The dose of NED, the key anticancer platinum complex drug, was increased from 60 to 70, and 80 mg/m(2) on day 1. ADM and 5-FU were administered at fixed doses (30 mg/m(2) on day 1, and 700 mg/m(2) on days 1-5). The dose-limiting toxicities of NED were neutropenia and severe diarrhea, and its maximum-tolerated dose and RD were 70 mg/m(2) and 60 mg/m(2), respectively. There were four responders among the six patients administered the RD. The present study thus revealed combination chemotherapy with NED, ADM, and 5-FU to be active and well-tolerated and to warrant phase II study.  相似文献   

12.
Purpose  The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose and dose-limiting toxicities of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus S-1 in advanced colorectal cancer. Methods  S-1 was administered orally at 80 mg/m2 per day for 14 consecutive days followed by a 2-week rest. CPT-11 was given intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each course, at an initial dose of 80 mg/m2 per day, stepping up to 100, 120 or 150 mg/m2 per day. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks, unless disease progression or severe toxicities were observed. Results  A total of 21 patients were entered in this study. The maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 was considered to be 150 mg/m2, because 2 of 3 patients developed dose-limiting toxicities such as leukopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea and anorexia. The recommend dose of CPT-11 was set at 120 mg/m2. Tumor response rate was 42.8% and median progression-free survival time was 10 months (95% confidential interval, 6.0–14.0 months). Conclusion  A combination of S-1 and CPT-11 showed a good safety profile and can be recommended for further phase II studies in patients with colorectal cancer.  相似文献   

13.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a regimen using Irinotecan, 5FU and Leucovorin for patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Irinotecan (75 mg/m(2)) was administered biweekly, while 5FU (600 mg/m(2)) and Leucovorin (250 mg/m(2)) were administered weekly, for 6 weeks. RESULTS: The 21 consecutive patients subjected to this regimen showed a good response rate (43%) with minimal toxicity (incidence of grade 3/4: leukopenia and neutropenia, 5%, respectively, and vomiting, 10%). The mean survival time of all 21 patients was 15.7 months. This regimen could be a valid option for patients with advanced colorectal cancer, especially those seeking a good QoL (quality of life) for the remainder of their lives. We evaluated the expression of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT) mRNAs, and sialyl Lewis X on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded colorectal tumor samples. Expression of TS mRNA or sialyl Lewis X was negatively correlated with the response from chemotherapy. Patients with low DPD mRNA expression in the tumor showed a significant longer survival than those with high expression. In patients with high TP mRNA expression, there was a tendency towards a high incidence of leukopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Some predictive factors elucidated in this study could contribute to the progress of the tumor-biology based, individualized chemotherapy for colorectal cancer patients.  相似文献   

14.
Pancreatic cancer represents one of the most lethal cancers and treatment of advanced disease remains palliative. Age-related physiologic changes can increase chemotherapy's toxicity but the use of gemcitabine in elderly patients has not been properly evaluated. This observational prospective study evaluated patients aged 70 years and over, receiving gemcitabine for an advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Gemcitabine was delivered according to the usual fixed-dose rate schedule (1000mg/(m(2)week) over 100min, every week, 3 weeks over 4). Thirty-nine patients (median age 74) were treated between November 1999 and August 2004. Twenty-three patients (59%) received 100% of the planned dose-intensity. Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (38% of patients), thrombocytopenia (28%), anemia (18%) and alopecia (18%). Four partial responses (10%) and 13 stabilizations (33%) were observed. Eight patients (20%) experienced clinical benefit. The median progression free and overall survivals were 7 and 10 months, respectively. Gemcitabine can be administered in selected elderly patients.  相似文献   

15.
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the FOLFIRI regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) after the failure of gemcitabine and platinum salts.METHODS: All consecutive patients with histologically confirmed, metastatic PAC and World Health Organization performance status (PS) ≤ 2 received FOLFIRI-1 [irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 and leucovorin 400 mg/m2 followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 bolus, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 as a 46-h infusion, biweekly] or FOLFIRI-3 (irinotecan 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and leucovorin 400 mg/m2, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 as a 46-h infusion and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 repeated on day 3, biweekly) after failure of gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapies as a systematic policy in two institutions between January 2005 and May 2010. Tumor response, time to progression (TTP), overall survival rate (OS) and grade 3-4 toxicities were retrospectively studied. Subgroup analyses were performed to search for prognostic factors.RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (52.4% male, median age 59 years) were analyzed. Among them, 42.9% were PS 0, 38.1% were PS 1 and 19.0% were PS 2. Fifty one patients (81.0%) had liver metastases. Before the FOLFIRI regimen, patients had received 1 line (n = 19), 2 lines (n = 39) or 3 lines (n = 5) of chemotherapy. Median TTP obtained with the line before FOLFIRI was 3.9 mo (95% CI: 3.4-5.3 mo). A total of 480 cycles was completed (median: 6 cycles, range: 1-51 cycles). The main reason for discontinuing FOLFIRI was tumor progression (90.3%). Tumor control was achieved in 25 patients (39.7%) (partial response: n = 5, stable disease: n = 20) with FOLFIRI. Median TTP was 3.0 mo (95% CI: 2.1-3.9 mo) and median OS was 6.6 mo (95% CI: 5.3-8.1 mo). Dose adaptation was required in 36 patients (57.1%). Fifteen patients (23.8%) had grade 3-4 toxicities, mainly hematological (n = 11) or digestive (n = 4). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 patients. There was no toxic death. PS 2 was significantly associated with poor TTP [hazard ratio (HR): 16.036, P < 0.0001] and OS (HR: 4.003, P = 0.004).CONCLUSION: The FOLFIRI regimen had an acceptable toxicity and an interesting efficacy in our study, limited to patients in good condition (PS 0-1).  相似文献   

16.
Purpose We evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of S-1 in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) for patients with colorectal cancer. Methods A total of 52 patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer were included. S-1 was given orally twice daily for 21 days and CDDP 30 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, followed by a 2-week period of no treatment. Results Tumor responses among patients included 18 PR, 12 SD, and 16 PD (n = 46). The overall response rate was 36.4% (18/46). The response rate of the patients with prior chemotherapy was 22.2% (4/18) and 50.0% (12/24) among the patients who had no prior therapy. The median survival periods were 555 days and the median progression free survival periods were 183 days, respectively. S-1 in combination with CDDP shows promising activity with acceptable toxicities against colorectal cancer. Conclusions A combination of S-1 and CDDP could be a standard therapy for treating colorectal carcinoma.  相似文献   

17.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chemotherapy provides dismal results in advanced pancreatic cancer patients, even when new compounds, such as gemcitabine, are used. Phase I studies of single-drug therapy with docetaxel or irinotecan suggested a response rate of about 15% in these patients. We report here a phase II study of docetaxel-irinotecan combination in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. METHODOLOGY: Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 was given in combination with irinotecan 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Prednisolone premedication and anti-HT3 drugs were systematically administered. Hematopoietic growth factors were given in case of febrile neutropenia or grade 4 neutropenia at the previous cycle. Endpoints were response rate, progression-free survival, and tolerance. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, of whom 25 had metastatic disease. We observed 3 partial responses and 11 stabilizations. The median progression-free survival was 4.3 months. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity with 18% of patients experiencing a grade 3-4 event. One patient died of neglected febrile neutropenia. Gastrointestinal toxicity was well controlled. Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: This combination has acceptable tolerance and, despite an 11% response rate, some partial responses and prolonged stabilizations were observed. The treatment induced clinical benefit in 33% of the patients. Further trials should focus on docetaxel or irinotecan, possibly used in combination with more conventional strategies (gemcitabine).  相似文献   

18.
Background  The modified irinotecan plus bolus 5-fluorouracil/L-leucovorin (IFL) regimen (irinotecan plus bolus 5-fluorouracil/L-leucovorin) used to be one of the standard treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer until approval of oxaliplatin in Japan. We evaluated the efficacy of modified IFL therapy for Japanese patients. Methods  Forty-seven patients with metastatic colorectal cancer received irinotecan (100 mg/m2) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2) plus L-leucovorin (10 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks until progression or unmanageable toxicity occurred. The data on toxicity and tumor response were analyzed retrospectively. Results  All patients discontinued modified IFL therapy due to cancer progression, except for one patient who developed severe liver dysfunction. The overall response rate was 25%. The median progression-free survival time (PFS) was 6.1 months. The median overall survival time (OS) was 17.4 months for all patients, 28.8 months for patients receiving subsequent oxaliplatin therapy, and 8.9 months for patients without oxaliplatin (P = 0.0031). According to multivariate analysis results, good performance status, a normal white cell count, and absence of local recurrence were associated with a better PFS. Tumor response was a good prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common toxicities, including grade 3 diarrhea (8%) and grade 3 anorexia (10%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 6% of patients. No other drug-related severe adverse events or deaths were observed. Conclusions  Modified IFL therapy is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Modified IFL therapy combined with biological agents might remain an option for some patients who refuse a central venous catheter. An erratum to this article can be found at  相似文献   

19.
Background. Advanced pancreatic cancer has limited treatment options. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is frequently used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Preclinical studies suggest synergism between trimetrexate (TMTX), 5-FU, and leucovorin (NFL). Aim. We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the activity and safety of NFL in pancreatic cancer. Method. Eligible patients (n=21) with untreated advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with 110 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) THTX on day 1 and 200 mg/m2 IV leucovorin prior to 500 mg/m2 IV 5-FU on day 2. Oral leucovorin (15 mg every 6 h for seven doses) started intravenous 24 h later. Results. Treatment was administered for 6 wk followed by a 2-wk rest period. Response was evaluated every 8 wk. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Most patients (80%) had distant metastases. Forty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The most common serious toxicities were Grade 3 diarrhea (23.8%) and nausea and vomiting (14.2%). The response rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 0–23%), median survival was 6.8 mo, and 1-yr survival was 19%. Conclusion. Treatment with NFL is well-tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The median survival and 1-yr survival in these patients with poor prognosis compares favorably with other treatment options.  相似文献   

20.
Purose. Determine the safety and efficacy of twice weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation to the upper abdomen followed by weekly gemcitabine in patients with surgically staged, locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods. Patients with surgically staged, locally advanced, nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with intravenous gemcitabine administered twice weekly (40 mg/m2/d) for 5 wk concurrent with upper abdominal radiation (50.4 Gy in 180 cGy daily fractions over 5.5 wk). At the completion of the chemoradiation, patients without disease progression were given gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) weekly for five cycles. Each cycle consisted of 3 wk of treatment followed by 1 wk without treatment. Disease progression and response were assessed at 6- to 8-wk intervals. Results. From February through December 1999, 43 patients were entered into this phase II trial, 39 of whom were evaluable for treatment response. The median age was 59 yr (range: 39–84 yr); there were 18 males (47%) in the study. Grade III and IV hematologic toxicity occurred in 48 and 21% of patients, respectively, and was primarily leukocytopenia and neutropenia. Grade III and IV gastrointestinal toxicities occurred in 31 and 10% of patients, respectively. There was one death attributed to sepsis. The concurrent gemcitabine and radiation portion of the study was completed without treatment interruptions in 56% of patients. The overall median survival was 8.2 mo and the median survival in the 44% of patients demonstrating a sustained CA-19-9 response was 13.5 mo. Only six patients experienced local regional progression as their first site of failure. Two patients (5%) were still alive at 35 and 41 mo posttreatment. Conclusions. These results confirm the feasibility of twice weekly gemcitabine and radiation for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Although this treatment strategy produced good local regional control, this did not result in a survival advantage. Stratifying patients by performance status and CA-19-9 response in future trials may be of value.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号