Cardiac valve replacement in patients on dialysis: influence of prosthesis on survival

BACKGROUND: Mechanical valves have been recommended for patients on dialysis because of purported accelerated bioprosthesis degeneration. This study was undertaken to determine time-related outcomes in dialysis patients requiring cardiac valve replacement. METHODS: From 1986 to 1998, 42 patients on chronic preoperative dialysis underwent valve replacement; 17 received mechanical valves and 25 received bioprostheses. Age was similar in both groups: 54+/-18.5 years (mechanical) and 59+/-15.5 years (bioprosthetic, p = 0.4). Sites of valve replacement were aortic (27), mitral (11), and aortic and mitral (4). Follow-up was 100% complete. RESULTS: Survival at 3 and 5 years was 50% and 33% after mechanical valve replacement, and 36% and 27% after bioprosthetic valve replacement (p = 0.3). Four patients with bioprostheses required reoperation: 3 for allograft endocarditis and 1 at 10 months for mitral bioprosthesis degeneration. One patient who received a mechanical valve required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic valve-related complications in patients on dialysis were similar for both mechanical and bioprosthetic valves. Because of the limited life expectancy of patients on dialysis, bioprosthesis degeneration will be uncommon. Therefore, surgeons should not hesitate to implant bioprosthetic valves in these patients.     

Late results after mitral valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prosthesis in children: evaluation of prosthesis-patient mismatch

BACKGROUND: Mechanical prosthesis is the choice of valve at the mitral position in children, although re-replacement of prostheses because of prosthesis-patient mismatch is almost inevitable when prostheses were implanted in small children. The methods to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch as a result of patients' somatic growth or pannus formation in children by noninvasive methods have not been well established. METHODS: Thirty-two children underwent mitral valve replacement with 37 bileaflet mechanical prostheses (26 St. Jude Medical prosthetic valves, and 11 CarboMedics prosthetic valves) and were followed up a mean of 6.8 years (maximum 18.3 years) with a complete follow-up rate of 94%. RESULTS: There were no operative deaths and 5 late deaths. Re-replacement of mitral valve because of prosthesis-patient mismatch was required in 5 patients. Freedom from valve-related events and re-replacement of mitral valve at 15 years were 32% +/- 23% and 54% +/- 18%, respectively. Actuarial survival rate was 63% +/- 19% at 15 years. Prosthetic valve orifice area index (manufactured geometric prosthetic valve area divided by patient's body surface area) was well correlated with maximum transprosthesis flow velocity estimated by Doppler echocardiography during follow-up, whereas valve orifice area index had no significant correlation with pulmonary artery wedge pressure assessed by cardiac catheterization. Maximum transprosthesis flow velocity had a significant correlation with pulmonary artery wedge pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Valve orifice area index itself was not a reliable index to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch. Maximum transprosthesis flow velocity was a useful index to predict pulmonary artery wedge. Invasive cardiac catheterization to determine re-replacement of the prosthesis should be considered when maximum transprosthesis flow velocity exceeds 270 cm/s.     

Cardiac valve replacement in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

BACKGROUND: Valve replacement in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients is being performed with increasing frequency, but the early and late results in these immunocompromised patients are not known. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective clinical review was undertaken; patients and their physicians were contacted for follow-up clinical status. RESULTS: Twenty-two HIV-infected patients underwent valve replacement between 1990 and 1999, with no operative or hospital deaths. Mean patient age was 37.6 years; 15 were men. Indications for operation were heart failure in 59% (13/22) and sepsis in 91% (20/22). There were 12 aortic valve replacements, seven mitral valve replacements, and three double valve replacements. Mechanical valves were used in 11, bioprostheses in seven, and homografts in four. Follow-up information was available in 20 of 22 patients (84%). At mean follow-up of 5 years, there were 10 late deaths, due to: intracerebral hemorrhage (2), heart failure (2), unknown cause (2), renal failure (1), AIDS (1), sepsis (1) and endocarditis (1). Of the 20 patients with active preoperative endocarditis, 4 (20%) developed recurrent endocarditis; freedom from recurrent endocarditis was 83% at 1 year. Intravenous drug abuse was reported in 16 patients; survival among these patients was 94% at 1 month and 50% at 5 years. Recurrent endocarditis was only seen in patients with continued intravenous drug abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Valve replacement in HIV-infected patients has low operative risk, but late results are poor when HIV infection is associated with intravenous drug abuse, probably due to immunocompromise and continued high-risk behavior.     

Valve replacement in children: guidelines for selection of prosthesis and timing of surgical intervention

One hundred fifty-nine patients ranging from 3 months to 18 years old (mean, 8.1 +/- 3.7 years) underwent 162 primary valve implantations. A porcine valve was used in 104 patients, a St. Jude Medical valve in 40, and a Bj?rk-Shiley valve in 18. The valve replaced was the aortic in 25 patients, the mitral (systemic atrioventricular [AV] valve) in 43, the pulmonary in 71, and the tricuspid (pulmonary AV valve) in 23. Hospital mortality was 6%. Patients with a Bj?rk-Shiley valve received warfarin sodium anticoagulation, and those with a St. Jude Medical valve were given salicylates and dipyridamole. Follow-up is available on all patients 0.6 to 12 years postoperatively (mean, 6.3 +/- 2.6 years). New York Heart Association Functional Class improved in 62% and remained unchanged in 38% of the patients. Thromboembolic complications occurred in only 8 (57%) of 14 patients with a St. Jude Medical valve in the right (pulmonary) side and in 3 (12%) of 26 with the valve in the left (systemic) side of the circulation. Bacterial endocarditis developed in 3 patients, all with porcine valves. Early valve replacement, less than 2 years after detection of hemodynamic deterioration, resulted in improvement in the ventricular ejection fraction in 25 of 29 patients (from 81 +/- 14% to 90 +/- 12% of normal; p less than 0.05). In contrast, the ejection fraction remained abnormal in all 22 patients with delayed valve insertion (more than 2 years) (81 +/- 16% of normal preoperatively and 80 +/- 10% of normal following operation; p = not significant).     

Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve replacement

Background

The role of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (IOTEE) in valve replacement surgery is not well established. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of immediate postpump IOTEE in valve replacement surgery at a single tertiary medical center.

Methods

The departmental database was screened for valve replacement operations (mechanical or bioprosthetic valves) performed during a 55-month period that were succeeded by immediate postpump IOTEE. Data was gathered regarding the impact of IOTEE on the immediate postoperative course.

Results

The study group included 417 patients (44.8% male, 55.2% female, age 65.2 ± 13.9 years). Prepump IOTEE was performed in 352 patients (84.4%). A single valve was replaced in 336 patients (80.6%) and two or more valves were replaced in 81 patients (19.4%). Overall 501 valves were inserted: mitral, 237 (131 mechanical, 106 biological); aortic, 221 (89 mechanical, 132 biological); tricuspid, 43 (2 mechanical, 41 biological). Unexpected pathologic echocardiographic findings on postpump IOTEE necessitated immediate surgical correction in 15 patients (3.6%): perivalvular leak in 8 patients (4 mitral, 4 aortic), immobilized leaflet in 4 patients (3 mitral, 1 tricuspid), coronary obstruction by an aortic bioprosthesis in 2 patients, and incompetent xenograft in 1 patient. Prolonged removal of air was necessary in 45 patients (10.8%). In 47 patients (11.3%) the postpump IOTEE contributed to the evaluation of difficult weaning from the bypass pump and to its appropriate therapeutic management (volume expansion, inotropic agents, vasodilators, or mechanical assistance).

Conclusions

Immediate postpump IOTEE is an important diagnostic and therapeutic role in valve replacement surgery and should be widely implemented.     

Bivalvular mechanical mitral-aortic valve replacement in 254 patients: long-term results--a 22-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: We have retrospectively studied 254 patients who underwent a bivalvular mechanical mitral-aortic replacement in the cardiovascular and thoracic surgery unit of Nantes from 1979 to 1989. The follow-up was 22 years (1979 to 2001). The last patient was operated on 12 years before the end of the follow-up. METHODS: All mitral prostheses were St. Jude Medical (SJM) bileaflet valves, and the aortic prostheses were 124 monodisc Bj?rk-Shiley valves, 3 Sorin prostheses, and 127 St. Jude Medical bileaflet prostheses. The mean age was 56.8 +/- 8.5 years with a sex ratio equal to 1. Rheumatism as the etiology predominated with 79.5%. Ninety-seven percent of the patients were followed for a total of 2,779 patient-years and a mean of 11.7 years. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 7.08%. Freedom from overall mortality and valve-related mortality at 22 years were 45.7% +/- 3.6% and 73.1% +/- 3%, respectively. The linearized rates of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events were 1.07% and 0.9% per patient-year, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed age (p < 0.002), sex (p < 0.01), and degenerative etiology (p = 0.04) as independent factors of late mortality, and age, sex, degenerative disease, and tricuspid pathology were related to valve-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows good results after mechanical mitral-aortic replacement in terms of survival rate and quality of life in surviving patients, and outlines the factors influencing long-term results as compared with isolated mitral valve replacement.     

Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses

Background

Advances in tissue prosthetic valve design and manufacturing have stimulated renewed interest in the use of biological valves in younger patients. This approach, however, risks reoperation. We therefore reviewed our recent experience with repeat mitral valve replacement to better define its contemporary risks.

Methods

Using a computerized database, we identified and compared 106 patients undergoing repeat mitral valve replacement with 562 control patients undergoing primary mitral valve replacement between January 1993 and December 2000 at our institution.

Results

There were no significant differences between repeat and primary surgery groups with respect to age (mean 66 ± 12 vs 64 ± 13 years), gender distribution (women 65% vs 64%), preoperative functional class, ejection fraction, or active endocarditis (6.6% vs 3.4%). The indication for reoperation in the repeat group was structural dysfunction in 49 patients (46%), paravalvular leak in 21 patients (20%), nonstructural dysfunction in 11 patients (10%), and progression of other native valve disease in 8 patients (8%). Prior prostheses were mechanical in 46 patients (43%). Mean time to reoperation was 11.5 ± 7.1 years. There were 5 deaths out of 106 patients in the repeat group (4.7%) and there were 23 deaths out of 562 patients in the control group (4.1%) (p = NS). Multivariate analysis identified prior myocardial infarction (p = 0.014, odds ratio 2.9) and nonelective surgical status (p = 0.004, odds ratio 2.3) as significant predictors of operative mortality.

Conclusions

The risk of repeat mitral valve replacement was low suggesting that there should be less reluctance to recommend patients choose a bioprosthesis over a mechanical prosthesis. Given the expected durability of current designs, bioprosthetic use may be explored in younger patients without subjecting those individuals to excessive risk.     

New prosthesis for cardiac valve replacement

This paper focus on the most common used prosthesis for replacement of diseased heart valves, when repair is not feasible. A brief historical review is made. New prosthesis and the trends for the future are also addressed.