Outlook: who needs LH in ovarian stimulation?

LH plays a key role in the intermediate-late phases of folliculogenesis. Although ovarian stimulation is efficiently achieved in most cases by the administration of exogenous FSH alone, specific subgroups of women may benefit from LH activity supplementation during ovarian stimulation. Some authors have found improved outcome with LH activity supplementation in advanced reproductive age women. Experience suggests that in about 10-12% of young normogonadotrophic patients treated with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol plus recombinant FSH human (r-hFSH), a 'steady response' is observed. In this subgroup of women, a higher number of oocytes is retrieved when daily LH activity supplementation is given from stimulation day 8, if compared with the standard FSH dose increase. Another subgroup of patients who may benefit from LH activity supplementation are those at risk for poor ovarian response treated with GnRH antagonist. Recent data demonstrate that in these women, when GnRH is administered in a flexible protocol, the concomitant addition of recombinant human LH improves the number of mature oocytes retrieved, when compared with the standard GnRH-a flare-up protocol. Thus, well calibrated LH administration improves the ovarian outcome in patients >35 years, in those showing an initial abnormal ovarian response to r-hFSH monotherapy, and in 'low prognosis' women treated with GnRH antagonists.     

Who needs LH in ovarian stimulation?

LH plays a key role in the intermediate-late phases of folliculogenesis. Although ovarian stimulation is efficiently achieved in most cases by the administration of exogenous FSH alone, specific subgroups of women may benefit from LH activity supplementation during ovarian stimulation. Some authors have found improved outcome with LH activity supplementation in advanced reproductive age women. Experience suggests that in about 10-12% of young normogonadotrophic patients treated with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol plus recombinant FSH human (r-hFSH), a 'steady response' is observed. In this subgroup of women, a higher number of oocytes is retrieved when daily LH activity supplementation is given from stimulation day 8, if compared with the standard FSH dose increase. Another subgroup of patients who may benefit from LH activity supplementation are those at risk for poor ovarian response treated with GnRH antagonist. Recent data demonstrate that in these women, when GnRH is administered in a flexible protocol, the concomitant addition of recombinant human LH improves the number of mature oocytes retrieved, when compared with the standard GnRH-a flare-up protocol. Thus, well calibrated LH administration improves the ovarian outcome in patients >35 years, in those showing an initial abnormal ovarian response to r-hFSH monotherapy, and in 'low prognosis' women treated with GnRH antagonists.     

Comparison of a single half-dose, long-acting form of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRH-a) and a short-acting form of GnRH-a for pituitary suppression in a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation program

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of a single low-dose leuprolide acetate depot (LA depot) and leuprolide acetate (LA) on pituitary down-regulation in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). DESIGN: Retrospective study.Setting: An IVF unit of an academic medical center. PATIENT(s): Women who underwent COH and IVF-ET. INTERVENTION(s): Pituitary down-regulation with half-dose LA depot (1.88 mg sc, group 1) or LA (0.5 mg/d sc, group 2) was started on menstrual days 21-23. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(s): The concentrations of estradiol (E(2)), FSH, LH, gonadotropin dosages, the numbers of oocytes retrieved, oocytes fertilized and embryos transferred, and pregnancy rates of the two groups were compared. RESULT(s): A total of 289 patients in group 1 and 158 in group 2 were included. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in baseline concentrations of E(2) and FSH, concentrations of E(2), FSH, and LH during hCG administration, gonadotropin dosage, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of oocytes fertilized and embryos transferred, and pregnancy rates. CONCLUSION(s): Single half-dose LA depot offers a useful alternative for pituitary suppression in ovarian stimulation for IVF.     

Role of periovulatory luteinizing hormone concentrations during assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated exclusively with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) concentration on fertilization, pregnancy, and early pregnancy loss rates. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care university center. PATIENT(S): One hundred sixty-six normogonadotropic patients undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Luteal phase pituitary down-regulation and recombinant FSH (Gonal-F) were used for ovarian stimulation. The mean of 4-5 serum LH concentrations, from stimulation days 5-12, was computed for analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization, pregnancy, and early pregnancy loss rates according to periovulatory levels of LH. RESULT(S): Data were analyzed by stratifying patients according to a mean periovulatory LH value of 3 mIU/mL. After controlling for confounding variables with logistic regression, results showed that the fertilization rate was significantly lower in patients with a periovulatory LH <3 mIU/mL versus > or = 3 mIU/mL (52% and 58%, respectively; P=.03). Pregnancy rates and spontaneous abortion rates were similar in both groups. There were seven biochemical pregnancies, all in patients with an LH <3 mIU/mL (P=.07). CONCLUSION(S): Low endogenous LH concentrations (<3 mIU/mL) in the late follicular phase of an IVF cycle are associated with significantly lower fertilization rates and a trend toward higher biochemical pregnancy rates. It may be of clinical benefit, when exclusively using r-hFSH in ART cycles, to add LH in the late follicular phase or to further reduce the dose of GnRH agonist.     

Clinical and endocrine effects of ovulation induction with FSH and hCG supplementation in low responders in the midfollicular phase. A pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the endocrine and clinical effects of luteinizing hormone (LH) activity supplementation administered in the midfollicular phase during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation to poor responders who were candidates for in vitro fertilization (IVF)--embryo transfer. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, nonrandomized trial with historical controls. Twenty-five IVF patients who had shown a poor response to standard, long-protocol GnRH-a and FSH only in a preceding cycle (cycle A), were stimulated in the next cycle after six months with hCG supplementation (50 I.U. subcutaneously daily) starting on day 7 during standard, long-protocol GnRH-a and FSH (cycle B). The comparative analysis of clinical effects (duration of stimulation, total highly purified (HP)-FSH dose, number of oocytes retrieved and pregnancy rate) and endocrine responses (serum E2, follicular E2 and androstenedione levels) were determined between cycles A and B. RESULTS: Maximum serum E2 levels and clinical pregnancy rate were higher in cycle B, with hCG supplementation. Also, the follicular E2 and androstenedione levels were higher in cycle B. No differences were noted between cycles as regards the duration of stimulation, total HP-FSH dose and number of oocytes retrieved. CONCLUSION: LH activity supplementation in the midfollicular phase yields favorable pregnancy results in low responders. This may be due to enhanced release of follicular precursors for greater synthesis of E2.     

Follicular phase serum levels of luteinizing hormone do not influence delivery rates in in vitro fertilization cycles down-regulated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and stimulated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of serum LH measurements in early and late follicular phase as predictors of ovarian response and IVF outcome in patients treated with recombinant FSH with GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) pituitary down-regulation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Institutional. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing 157 consecutive IVF cycles suppressed with leuprolide acetate (LA) started in the midluteal phase and stimulated with recombinant FSH. Only women <40 years of age and with a basal cycle day 3 serum FSH 相似文献   

Comparison of stimulation with clomiphene citrate in combination with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone to stimulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol: a prospective,randomized study

OBJECTIVE: To compare IVF-ET outcome with a new stimulation protocol using clomiphene citrate (CC) with recombinant FSH and LH to stimulation with the standard long GnRH-a protocol. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Outpatient infertility clinic in Vienna, Austria. PATIENT(S): Two hundred ninety-four infertile women undergoing IVF-ET; 154 IVF cycles stimulated with CC + recombinant FSH + recombinant LH (group A) and 140 cycles with long GnRH-a suppression + recombinant FSH (group B). INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, egg retrieval, and ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cycle parameters (number of oocytes, fertilization, number of embryos) and outcome (pregnancy rate, cancellation rate, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [OHSS]). RESULT(S): Pregnancy rate per ET was 42.9% (implantation rate, 21.3%) in group A and 36.6% (17.4%) in group B. Cancellation rates were similar. The OHSS occurred in four cases (3%) in group A and 12 cases (10%) in group B. CONCLUSION(S): Stimulation with CC + recombinant FSH + recombinant LH leads to comparable pregnancy rates vs. the long protocol. With this new stimulation, less gonadotropins are used and there is less need for monitoring (lower cost for patient and clinic). The risk of OHSS is reduced as well. Therefore, this protocol should be regarded as the first-line treatment.     

Induction of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist

OBJECTIVE: To use gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) instead of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to induce oocyte maturation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN: Pituitary and ovarian responses to GnRH-a and the outcome of IVF were studied prospectively. Data from patients injected with hCG were analyzed retrospectively. SETTING: Program of IVF at the Rambam (Governmental) Hospital, Haifa, Israel. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: One or two doses of buserelin acetate 250 to 500 micrograms were administered to six patients with moderate response (Estradiol [E2], 1,494 +/- 422 [+/- SD] pg/mL) and 8 patients with exaggerated response (E2, 7,673 +/- 3,028 pg/mL) to gonadotropin stimulation. Progesterone (P) and E2 were administered for luteal support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist effectively triggered luteinizing hormone (LH)/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) surge. Mature oocytes were recovered in all patients. Luteal E2 and P were lower than in patients injected with hCG. No signs of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were observed. RESULTS: Serum LH and FSH rose over 4 and 12 hours, respectively, and were significantly (P less than 0.05) elevated for 24 hours. Of all mature oocytes, 67% fertilized and 82% cleaved. Four pregnancies were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: A bolus of GnRH-a is able to trigger an adequate midcycle LH/FSH surge, resulting in oocyte maturation and pregnancy. Our preliminary results also suggest that it allows a more accurate control of ovarian steroid levels during the luteal phase and may prevent the clinical manifestation of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.     

Serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and oestradiol pattern in women undergoing pituitary suppression with different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue protocols for assisted reproduction.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) are used widely in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles for assisted reproduction. At present, there is great debate about the influence of exogenous hormone activity on the hypothalamus-pituitary axis following pituitary desensitization. The objective of this comparative study was to investigate the pattern of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with different GnRH-a preparations. We retrospectively analysed 201 women, aged between 27 and 43 years, who were referred consecutively to our infertility clinic between January 2002 and January 2003. All women had no endocrinopathies or occult ovarian failure as assessed by day-3 hormone profile. Women were enrolled in one of the following COS protocols: depot triptorelin long protocol (n = 38), buserelin long protocol (n = 101) or buserelin short protocol (n = 62). Recombinant FSH was used to induce ovulation. Treatment was monitored by transvaginal ultrasound scan and serum measurement of FSH, LH and oestradiol. Among the women initially included, 30 had cancelled cycles due to poor ovarian response. Serum LH levels were significantly higher in the short-protocol group compared with the long-protocol groups (p < 0.001). The number of follicles, oocyte yield, number of grade-I embryos and fertilization rate were significantly lower in the short-protocol group than in the long-protocol groups. These findings showed that LH concentrations are significantly higher in women undergoing reversible medical hypophysectomy with a GnRH-a short protocol than in women treated with a long protocol. The hypothesis of an LH ceiling is confirmed.     

Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in normogonadotropic women down-regulated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist who were undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and endocrinological effects of intranasal (IN) vs. subcutaneous (SC) GnRH-a for pituitary down-regulation combined with hMG vs. rFSH. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: University hospital, IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Three hundred seventy-nine normogonadotropic women eligible for IVF or ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Randomization to intranasal (IN) or SC GnRH-a and to hMG or rFSH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Oocytes retrieved, embryos developed, clinical pregnancy, and delivery rates. Serum hormone concentrations on stimulation days 1 (S1) and 8 (S8), and oocyte pick-up (OPU) day. RESULT(S): After randomization, four groups were formed: IN/hMG (n = 100), IN/FSH (n = 98), SC/hMG (n = 89), and SC/FSH (n = 92). Mean number of oocytes retrieved and of transferable and transferred embryos were similar in the four groups. Clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle was significantly higher in the IN/HMG group than in the SC/FSH group (P<.05) and was intermediate in the two remaining groups. Se-LH on S8 in the two SC groups was significantly lower than in the two IN groups. Se-E2 on S8 in the SC/FSH group was significantly lower than in the other three groups. CONCLUSION(S): The clinical and endocrinological outcome in IVF and ICSI-treated normogonadotropic women is significantly influenced by mode of down-regulation as well as gonadotropin formulation.     

Relationship between gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist dosage and in vitro fertilization outcome.

A prospective study in 132 women undergoing in vitro fertilization was performed in order to assess whether lower doses of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) may ensure adequate oocyte retrieval and pregnancy rate, without pituitary oversuppression. Forty-five patients received subcutaneous tryptorelin depot (Decapeptyl 3.75, IPSEN SpA), 41 received subcutaneous tryptorelin acetate daily (Decapeptyl 0.1 mg, IPSEN SpA) and 46 received 0.05 mg tryptorelin acetate daily from day 21 of the cycle. From day 3 of the new cycle, if the estradiol levels were < 30 pg/ml, patients received two or three ampules of gonadotropin daily. In the group receiving subcutaneous tryptorelin acetate depot, the mean number of total gonadotropin ampules was significantly higher (p < 0.05), otherwise estradiol levels and the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilized and cleaved were significantly lower (p < 0.05). Pituitary oversuppression induced by GnRH-a causes an increase in the gonadotropin requirement for assisted reproductive techniques (ART) and a reduction in the number of oocytes retrieved and fertilized. There is a high risk of oversuppression in normal-weight or underweight women, because there is greater bioavailability of the peptide, hence elevated circulating levels of GnRH-a. Thus, ovarian stimulation in ART cycles depends on many factors, not least the identification of the best GnRH-a dose.     

Serum luteinizing hormone in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and its relationship with cycle outcome

The serum LH was determined on days 3, 6, and 8 of stimulation and on the day of hCG in 110 normogonadotropic patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for IVF induced with GnRH antagonists and recombinant FSH, creating three groups of patients according to Tukey's hinges (percentiles 25 and 75) for each determination. No differences were observed between the number of oocytes recovered or the fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy rates (PR) of the groups, although patients with high serum LH levels during stimulation showed significantly higher serum E2 levels on the day of hCG.     

Impact of high basal FSH/LH ratio in women with normal FSH levels on in vitro fertilization outcomes

Abstract

Basal luteinizing hormone (LH) levels have also been suggested to impact on ovarian responsiveness as well as basal follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes according to cycle day 3 FSH/LH ratio and to assess the proper stimulation protocol between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols. The retrospective cohort study recruited a total of 1211 women having the laboratory values of FSH (<10?IU/L) and LH within 3 months before IVF. Patients were treated with GnRH agonist long or GnRH antagonist protocols and stimulated with recombinant FSH (rFSH). The number of total retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate were analyzed between groups: Group I: FSH/LH?<?2 and Group II: FSH/LH?≥?2. The Group II had the small number of retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes compared to the Group I (p?=?0.000). Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate were lower in Group II (p?=?0.006, 0.006, respectively). In comparison of each protocol within groups, Group II showed significantly low pregnancy rate when GnRH antagonist was administered. In women with normal FSH level, high day 3 FSH/LH ratio can present subclinically low ovarian reserve and be predictive of lower pregnancy outcomes in fresh IVF cycles, and the choice of GnRH agonist can be related to favorable IVF outcomes.     

Comparison of leuprolide acetate and triptorelin in assisted reproductive technology cycles: a prospective,randomized study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of two depot GnRH-a, leuprolide and triptorelin, in long-suppression GnRH-a protocols. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: An IVF unit of an academic medical center.Fifty-two women who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were prospectively randomized to receive 3.75 mg depot formulations of either leuprolide or triptorelin on days 21-23 of the menstrual cycle. Stimulation with gonadotropins was initiated after pituitary desensitization was achieved. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The stimulation pattern and cycle outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULT(S): Twenty-six patients were included in each group. No significant differences were observed in the patient age, estrogen, and P levels on day of hCG administration, gonadotropin dosage, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, percentage of high-quality embryos, and number of embryos transferred. However, significantly higher clinical implantation and pregnancy rates were found in the leuprolide group compared with the triptorelin group. CONCLUSION(S): A depot preparation of leuprolide is associated with higher implantation and pregnancy rates than a depot preparation of triptorelin when it is used in the midluteal phase as part of the long-suppression GnRH-a protocol in IVF.     

Serum luteinizing hormone,follicle-stimulating hormone and oestradiol pattern in women undergoing pituitary suppression with different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue protocols for assisted reproduction

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) are used widely in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles for assisted reproduction. At present, there is great debate about the influence of exogenous hormone activity on the hypothalamus–pituitary axis following pituitary desensitization. The objective of this comparative study was to investigate the pattern of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with different GnRH-a preparations. We retrospectively analysed 201 women, aged between 27 and 43 years, who were referred consecutively to our infertility clinic between January 2002 and January 2003. All women had no endocrinopathies or occult ovarian failure as assessed by day-3 hormone profile. Women were enrolled in one of the following COS protocols: depot triptorelin long protocol (n?=?38), buserelin long protocol (n?=?101) or buserelin short protocol (n?=?62). Recombinant FSH was used to induce ovulation. Treatment was monitored by transvaginal ultrasound scan and serum measurement of FSH, LH and oestradiol. Among the women initially included, 30 had cancelled cycles due to poor ovarian response. Serum LH levels were significantly higher in the short-protocol group compared with the long-protocol groups (p?<?0.001). The number of follicles, oocyte yield, number of grade-I embryos and fertilization rate were significantly lower in the short-protocol group than in the long-protocol groups. These findings showed that LH concentrations are significantly higher in women undergoing reversible medical hypophysectomy with a GnRH-a short protocol than in women treated with a long protocol. The hypothesis of an LH ceiling is confirmed.     

Cessation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) upon down-regulation versus conventional long GnRH-a protocol in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen that involves GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) discontinuation before administration of gonadotropins would benefit poor responders. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital-based IVF Unit. PATIENT(S): Sixty-three patients with previous poor response to COH and/or high basal FSH level (> or =9 mIU/mL) undergoing 78 IVF-ET cycles. INTERVENTION(S): In both groups, administration of GnRH-a was started in the midluteal phase. Whereas in the study group (40 cycles), it ended before administration of gonadotropins, in controls (38 cycles) GnRH-a treatment was continued throughout the follicular phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ovarian stimulation patterns and IVF outcome. RESULT(S): A significantly higher cancellation rate was noted in the study group than in the controls (22.5% versus 5%, respectively). The new and control regimens resulted in similar stimulation characteristics and clinical pregnancy rates (11% versus 10.3%, respectively). In 13 patients with a basal FSH level that was not persistently high, the new regimen resulted in a significantly higher number of retrieved oocytes compared with the standard protocol (7.6+/-1.03 versus 4.0+/-0.68, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): Whereas for most low responders, the new COH regimen offers no further advantage, future prospective studies may demonstrate whether it can confer a benefit for a subset of patients with a basal FSH level that is not persistently high.     

Serum antimüllerian hormone/müllerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the concentration of early follicular phase serum antimullerian hormone (AMH) or mullerian-inhibiting substance (MIS) is a useful marker of ovarian response and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of day 3 serum samples drawn before treatment. SETTING: Private ART program. PATIENT(S): One hundred nine consecutive serum samples from women younger than 42 years of age who were undergoing ovulation induction for IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Follicular aspiration for IVF after ovarian stimulation with FSH in a down-regulated cycle using GnRH-a treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Correlations between day 3 serum AMH/MIS, E2, FSH, inhibin B levels, and IVF outcome (i.e., number of retrieved mature oocytes, number and quality of embryos obtained, ongoing clinical pregnancy rates). Multivariate regression analysis on categorical data was performed to describe a predictive model of clinical pregnancy outcome. RESULT(S): Mean serum AMH/MIS value for clinical pregnancy (n = 38) was 2.4 ng/mL, in comparison to 1.1 ng/mL for those who did not become pregnant (n = 71). No differences were noted in mean values for day 3 FSH, inhibin B, or E2 between groups. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that day 3 serum AMH/MIS had the greatest independent contribution in predicting pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION(S): These data demonstrate a strong association between day 3 serum AMH/MIS level and IVF outcome in women younger than 42 years of age. Higher AMH/MIS concentrations are associated with a greater number of mature oocytes, a greater number of embryos, and ultimately a higher clinical pregnancy rate. Furthermore, AMH/MIS may offer greater prognostic value than other currently available serum markers of ART outcome.     

Basal FSH concentration as a predictor of IVF outcome in older women undergoing stimulation with GnRH antagonist

The aim of this study was to determine the value of basal FSH as a predictor of assisted reproduction outcome in women >or=35 years undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. A retrospective clinical study was carried out on 83 infertile women, 35-45 years old, divided into three groups according to their day 3 FSH concentration (group A = FSH 10 and <15 mIU/ml, group C = FSH >15 mIU/ml). Patients underwent ovarian stimulation with a GnRH-antagonist protocol. Group A women had significantly higher basal inhibin B concentrations (P < 0.001), lower cancellation rate (P < 0.001), required a significantly lower dosage of recombinant FSH (P < 0.0001) and had significantly higher oestradiol concentration under stimulation compared with the other groups (P < 0.0001). Oocyte and embryo numbers were comparable in all groups, although groups B and C had more low quality embryos compared with group A. The number of metaphase II oocytes and embryos was related to patients' ovarian reserve markers only in group C. Pregnancy and delivery rates were 35 and 22.5% in group A, 22.2 and 16.6% in group B and 5 and 0% in group C. It is concluded that a basal FSH cut-off of 10 mIU/ml seems predictive of ovarian reserve, while basal FSH cut-off of 15 mIU/ml seems predictive of pregnancy potential and probably of oocyte quality.     

Luteinizing hormone concentrations after gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration do not influence pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of circulating LH concentrations during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on the outcome of IVF. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Two-hundred seventy women who had a short stimulation protocol with GnRH antagonist and ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH). INTERVENTION(S): GnRH antagonist and rFSH were administered SC; blood samples were collected on the day of GnRH antagonist administration, 1 day after, and on the day of hCG administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A threshold of 0.5 IU/L on the day of hCG was chosen to discriminate between women with LH concentrations 0.5 IU/L (group B, n = 151). RESULT(S): The two groups were comparable with regard to the clinical parameters. In group A, significantly lower LH concentrations were observed on day 9 of the cycle and on the day of hCG administration. The numbers of oocytes retrieved, embryos obtained, and embryos cryopreserved were significantly higher in group A compared with group B. The proportion of clinical pregnancies was similar in the two groups (21.1% vs. 22.7 % per ET). CONCLUSION(S): In GnRH antagonist and rFSH protocols, suppressed serum LH concentrations do not have any influence on the final stages of follicular maturation, pregnancy rates, or outcomes.     

IVF-ET周期中GnRH-a、FSH、hMG配伍方案的比较研究

目的:探讨IVF周期中采用不同促排卵方案时,卵泡液及血清中FSH、LH、E2水平的变化及对胚胎发育、受精、妊娠的影响;单用国产hMG促排卵的效果。方法:120例分成4组。测定卵泡液及取卵日血清中FSH、LH、E2水平,比较四种方案的取卵数、受精率、Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级胚胎形成率和每移植周期妊娠率。结果:四种促排卵方案的卵泡液和血清FSH、E2水平没有差别（P>0.05）,不同垂体降调节者,卵泡液和血清LH水平明显升高（P<0.0001）,四种促排卵方案的取卵数、受精率、优质胚胎形成率、移植周期妊娠率经统计学处理均无显著性差异。结论:卵泡液和血清中LH水平升高可能与应用垂体降调节有关,而与选择纯FSH还是hMG促排卵无关。轻度LH升高并不影响卵泡发育、卵子质量和以后的胚胎发育。IVF周期首选垂体降调节加FSH或FSH/hMG促排卵方案,单用hMG促排卵也可以作为选择。