Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy of Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

The landscape of therapeutic options for the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR⁺) HER2⁻ breast cancer (BC) has been profoundly changed by the introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors into the metastatic setting. Currently all CDK4/6 inhibitors are approved only in the metastatic setting by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicine Agency (EMA), whereas their role in the neoadjuvant setting is still at an investigational stage. Exploitation of novel agents such as CDK4/6 inhibitors to improve the efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) or to overcome de novo resistance to ET is an area of research under active evaluation. We present a review of the currently available data and ongoing clinical trials that are evaluating the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy of HR⁺ HER2⁻ early BC, and also illustrate translational aspects, such as the potential biomarkers of response to these new therapeutic agents.     

Ribociclib for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive,human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer

Introduction: The emergence of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a significant advancement in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Ribociclib is an orally bioavailable, highly selective inhibitor of CDK4/6. In combination with various endocrine therapies, ribociclib has demonstrated clinical activity as a first-line therapy for patients with HR+, HER2? advanced breast cancer, without compromising the favorable toxicity profile associated with endocrine therapy. Thus, ribociclib is now considered a new standard of care for HR+, HER2? advanced breast cancer.

Areas covered: This review provides a concise overview of the preclinical and clinical development of ribociclib, including evidence of its clinical activity and safety profile when combined with endocrine therapy in HR+, HER2? advanced breast cancer.

Expert commentary: CDK4/6 inhibition represents a promising treatment option for patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer. Ribociclib significantly improved progression-free survival in patients receiving first-line endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2? advanced breast cancer. Planned and ongoing trials investigating ribociclib in combination with other endocrine therapies and in various clinical settings will help to determine the optimal treatment sequence for different patient populations.     

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: preliminary results and ongoing studies

The cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6-inhibitors (CDK4/6i) induce cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase what eventually can prevent the proliferation of cancer cells. The CDK4/6i have changed the landscape of treatment options for ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Currently, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in this setting. This success encouraged the researchers to examine CDK4/6i activity in (neo)adjuvant setting. In this review, clinical data to date and ongoing clinical trials with palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib in the early breast cancer are discussed. A literature search of these topics was carried out using PubMed and data reported at international oncology meetings and clinicaltrials.gov were included. Currently, we have the early promising data from Phase II clinical trials of CDK4/6i efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting in women with HR-positive breast cancer. Moreover, there are numerous studies that are in progress today in (neo)adjuvant setting.     

Arthralgia induced by endocrine therapy with or without cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) have been approved for breast cancer (BC) treatment. Several trials suggested that arthralgia was reduced in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i compared with that in those with ET-alone. We aimed to compare arthralgia rates in BC patients treated with/without CDK4/6i. We reviewed randomized controlled phase II/III trials investigating CDK4/6i with ET in hormone receptor-positive and epidermal growth factor 2-negative BC. Publications were retrieved from PubMed from January 2014 to April 2021. We compared arthralgia rates between patients who were administered ET plus CDK4/6i (CDK4/6i group) and those treated with ET-alone (control group). We reviewed 12 trials that reported data on adverse effects for arthralgia. These trials included 17,440 patients (9255 in the CDK4/6i group and 8185 in the control group). The arthralgia rate in the CDK4/6i group was significantly lower than that in the control group (27.6% vs. 34.8%, p < .001), especially in early BC (28.8% vs. 37.3%, p < .001). These suggested that the arthralgia rate in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i was lower than that in patients treated with ET-alone and that CDK4/6i may decrease the arthralgia rate in BC patients treated with ET, especially in early BC.     

Comparison of treatment-related adverse events of different Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: A network meta-analysis

BackgroundPalbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have all been approved in combination with endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. While the efficacy of these drugs appears similar, differences in safety and tolerability are apparent.MethodsWe searched PubMed and ASCO, ESMO and SABCS proceedings to identify randomized trials of palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Data on common and serious adverse events (AE) were extracted for each approved drug. The odds ratio for each AE and the hazard ratio for progression-free survival were calculated relative to endocrine therapy alone. A network meta-analysis was then performed for each endocrine therapy backbone (aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant) to compare ribociclib and abemaciclib to palbociclib.Results8 trials were included in the analysis and comprised 2799 patients receiving cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors palbociclib: 873 patients; ribociclib: 1153 patients; abemaciclib: 773 patients. In 5 trials (1524 patients), the endocrine therapy backbone was an AI and in 3 trials (1275 patients) it was fulvestrant. Compared to palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib showed significantly lower grade 3–4 neutropenia, but significantly higher GI toxicity. Treatment discontinuation was higher with abemaciclib than other drugs. Efficacy of the 3 drugs was similar. Compared to palbociclib, for AI backbone, the HR for PFS for ribociclib was 0.98 and for abemaciclib 1.02. For fulvestrant backbone, the HR were 0.88 and 0.93 respectively.ConclusionsPalbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have comparable efficacy, but differences in safety and tolerability. Abemaciclib has worse tolerability with significantly higher treatment discontinuation likely due to GI toxicity.     

Therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Resistance mechanisms and novel treatment strategies

Endocrine therapy has been the standard of care for patients with metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer since the 1970s, improving survival while avoiding the toxicities associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, all HR-positive tumors ultimately develop resistance to endocrine therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have more recently become an important component of the management of this breast cancer subtype, significantly delaying time to the disease progression and improving survival when combined with endocrine therapy. However, as with endocrine therapy alone, treatment resistance remains a universal phenomenon. As more women receive CDK4/6 inhibitors as part of their treatment, the management of de novo and acquired resistance to combined CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy regimens has emerged as an important clinical challenge. Several resistance mechanisms have been described, including alterations in the CDK4/6/cyclin D complex or its major effector retinoblastoma protein (pRb), bypass signaling through other cyclin/CDK complexes and activation of upstream signaling pathways, in particular the PI3K/mTOR pathway, but robust biomarkers to predict resistance remain elusive, and the role for continuing CDK4/6 inhibitors after progression remains under investigation. Novel strategies being evaluated in clinical trials include the continuation of CDK4/6 inhibitors through progression, as well as triplet therapy combinations with PI3K inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors.     

The implementation of CDK 4/6 inhibitors and its impact on treatment choices in HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer patients: A study of the Dutch SONABRE Registry

In August 2017, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have been reimbursed in the Netherlands for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2?) advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study evaluates the implementation of CDK4/6 inhibitors and changes in treatment choices in the Netherlands. All patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2? ABC in 2009 to 2018 in seven hospitals were selected from the Southeast Netherlands Advanced Breast cancer (SONABRE) registry. The 2-year cumulative use of CDK4/6 inhibitors since reimbursement date (August 2017) was assessed using competing-risk methodology in two cohorts. The first cohort included patients with ABC diagnosis between August 2017 and December 2018. The second cohort included patients with ABC diagnosis between 2009 and August 2017, and still alive on August 1, 2017. In addition, treatment choices in the first three lines of therapy in calendar years 2009 to 2018 were evaluated for the total study population. Among patients diagnosed since August 2017 (n = 214), 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43-57) received CDK4/6 inhibitors within 2 years beyond diagnosis. Of eligible patients diagnosed before August 2017 (n = 417), 31% (95% CI = 27-36) received CDK4/6 inhibitors within 2 years following reimbursement. Another 20% of both cohorts are still CDK4/6 inhibitor naïve and on first-line therapy. The use of chemotherapy decreased in first two lines of therapy between 2009 and 2018 (first-line: 29%-13%; second-line: 26%-19%). The implementation rate of CDK4/6 inhibitors since reimbursement is currently 50% within 2 years beyond diagnosis and is expected to increase further. The implementation of targeted therapy decreased the use of chemotherapy as first-line therapy.     

American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2004.

PURPOSE: To update the 2003 American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on adjuvant use of aromatase inhibitors. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on results from multiple large randomized trials, adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer should include an aromatase inhibitor in order to lower the risk of tumor recurrence. Neither the optimal timing nor duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy is established. Aromatase inhibitors are appropriate as initial treatment for women with contraindications to tamoxifen. For all other postmenopausal women, treatment options include 5 years of aromatase inhibitors treatment or sequential therapy consisting of tamoxifen (for either 2 to 3 years or 5 years) followed by aromatase inhibitors for 2 to 3, or 5 years. Patients intolerant of aromatase inhibitors should receive tamoxifen. There are no data on the use of tamoxifen after an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant setting. Women with hormone receptor-negative tumors should not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy. The role of other biomarkers such as progesterone receptor and HER2 status in selecting optimal endocrine therapy remains controversial. Aromatase inhibitors are contraindicated in premenopausal women; there are limited data concerning their role in women with treatment-related amenorrhea. The side effect profiles of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors differ. The late consequences of aromatase inhibitor therapy, including osteoporosis, are not well characterized. CONCLUSION: The Panel believes that optimal adjuvant hormonal therapy for a postmenopausal woman with receptor-positive breast cancer includes an aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy or after treatment with tamoxifen. Women with breast cancer and their physicians must weigh the risks and benefits of all therapeutic options.     

Practical Treatment Strategies and Future Directions After Progression While Receiving CDK4/6 Inhibition and Endocrine Therapy in Advanced HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with backbone endocrine therapy have markedly improved progression-free survival and overall survival over endocrine therapy alone in advanced hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative (HR⁺/HER2⁻) breast cancer and are the standard of care in the first- or second-line setting. There are few data to drive decision making for subsequent treatment strategies after inevitable disease progression after CDK4/6i. Information about the genomic landscape of CDK4/6i-resistant disease is emerging. Resistance mechanisms appear to be varied, but mutations in PIK3CA and ESR1, which can be acquired while receiving treatment, are frequent. Activating PIK3CA mutations are present in up to 35% of patients and are now the most actionable genomic alteration in HR⁺/HER2⁻ advanced breast cancer with the recent approval of alpelisib and fulvestrant. Everolimus-based combinations and chemotherapy appear to have continued efficacy after progression while receiving CDK4/6i, although historical data on benefit include CDK4/6i-naive patients. Use of selective estrogen down-regulators over aromatase inhibitors is best once the patient has an acquired ESR1 mutation. Tumor biopsy with genomic sequencing and repeat biomarker analysis in patients with CDK4/6i- and endocrine-resistant disease will be integral to guide subsequent treatment strategies and to inform clinical trial eligibility. Promising novel therapeutics in CDK4/6i-resistant disease including oral selective estrogen down-regulators, fibroblast growth factor receptor antagonists, and immunotherapy will be discussed.     

Optimizing endocrine therapy for premenopausal and postmenopausal women with breast cancer

The majority of invasive breast cancer patients present with hormone receptor-positive disease, and modulation of estrogen receptor (ER) activation is an essential component of systemic adjuvant therapy for these women. While tamoxifen has traditionally been the primary adjuvant endocrine therapy for all ER-positive women, recent trials evaluating the use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have challenged this standard in postmenopausal women, and ongoing trials are examining the optimal use of endocrine therapy in younger women. Issues regarding the optimal approach to endocrine therapy in both pre- and postmenopausal women are examined in this review.     

Efficacy and safety of everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive,human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: Results of the single-arm,phase IIIB 4EVER trial

In BOLERO-2, adding everolimus to exemestane resulted in a twofold increase in median progression-free survival (PFS) vs exemestane in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (aBC) after progression on a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). Here, we report on the open-label, single-arm, phase IIIB 4EVER trial (NCT01626222). This trial evaluated the clinical effectiveness of everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− aBC who had progressed on or after an NSAI, but with no restrictions on the time of progression after NSAI, prior chemotherapy for advanced disease or previous exemestane. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; i.e. the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete or partial response per RECIST 1.1) within the first 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival, safety and health-related quality of life. Between June 2012 and November 2013, 299 patients were enrolled at 82 German centers: 281 patients were evaluable for efficacy and 299 for safety. The ORR was 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8–12.9%). Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 5.4–6.0 months). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were stomatitis (8.4%), general physical health deterioration (6.7%), dyspnea (4.7%) and anemia (4.3%). The ORR in 4EVER was lower than in BOLERO-2, likely due to inclusion of patients with more advanced disease and extensive pretreatment. These data confirm the clinical benefits and known safety profile of everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− aBC.     

CDK4/6抑制剂的联合治疗模式

 细胞周期素依赖激酶（CDKs）抑制剂联合内分泌治疗已经用于晚期乳腺癌的治疗。除了内分泌治疗，CDK4/6抑制剂还可以联合表皮生长因子受体（EGFR）抑制剂、磷脂酰肌醇-3激酶（PI3K）/哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白（mTOR）抑制剂、化学治疗、免疫治疗、分子靶向治疗和其他治疗。联合治疗模式克服了CDK4/6抑制剂的耐药并提高了临床疗效，开启了肿瘤精准治疗的一扇新窗口。     

First-line endocrine treatment of breast cancer: aromatase inhibitor or antioestrogen?

Until recently, endocrine therapy for breast cancer was relatively simple. If the tumour expressed hormone receptors, regardless of stage and age, tamoxifen was indicated. While this largely remains the case for premenopausal women, clinical trials in postmenopausal women have broadened our choice to include one of three selective aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the nonsteroidal agents anastrozole or letrozole and the steroidal agent exemestane. Comparative data concerning the efficacy, toxicity, tolerability and cost of AI vs tamoxifen continues to evolve with over 40 000 women slated to be involved in clinical trials. Currently, tamoxifen remains an appropriate choice for adjuvant treatment, and will remain so unless a clear survival advantage emerges for adjuvant AI therapy. However, anastrozole is widely seen as a useful alternative, with particular merit for patients prone to the development of serious tamoxifen side effects. For endocrine therapy na?ve advanced disease, several trials have provided evidence that a nonsteroidal AI has replaced tamoxifen as optimal treatment. In the neoadjuvant setting, letrozole was also more effective than tamoxifen, both in terms of response rates and the incidence of breast-conserving surgery, and so AI therefore also dominates this evolving indication. The ongoing adjuvant clinical trials ask all the relevant questions regarding tamoxifen and AI in combination, sequence and duration, except for 5 years of an AI vs a longer period. For both the advanced and early-stage disease, resistance remains the key obstacle to overcome, and trials that combine endocrine agents with signal transduction inhibitors such as HER1 and HER2 kinase inhibitors, farnesyl transferase inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors as well as COX2 inhibitors are being developed in a concerted attempt to address this problem.     

Real-world Outcomes of Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitors Continued Beyond First Disease Progression in Hormone Receptor-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

BackgroundCDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), in combination with aromatase inhibitors, are United States Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2^?) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The effectiveness of continuing them beyond first disease progression (PD) is currently unknown. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of the continuation of CDK4/6i beyond first PD in HR⁺/HER2^? MBC using real-world experience.Patients and MethodsA single-institution retrospective review of patients with HR⁺ MBC who received CDK4/6is from 2015 to 2018 and where CDK4/6is were continued beyond first PD. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) after initial PD on CDK4/6i therapy.ResultsThirty women with HR⁺/HER2^? MBC met eligibility criteria. Patients were identified from a prospective database of patients at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation who were prescribed CDK4/6is. The median age and follow-up duration were 47.5 years and 27 months, respectively. Most patients received palbociclib (PA)/letrozole as initial therapy (67%), followed by PA/fulvestrant (23%), and PA/other aromatase inhibitor (20%), and abemaciclib with either fulvestrant or letrozole (6%). As of January 31, 2019, 25 (83.3%) patients were still alive, and 19 (63%) patients had progressed. The estimated median PFS for continued CDK4/6i use beyond the first PD was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.34-13.13 months).ConclusionsAmong a small cohort of patients with HR⁺ MBC in a non-clinical trial setting, continuation of CDK4/6i-endocrine treatment post initial PD was associated with a median PFS of about 12 months. Formal randomized clinical trials evaluating the continuation of CDK4/6is beyond the first PD are currently ongoing and will provide more answers to this important clinical question.     

CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗晚期乳腺癌

内分泌治疗因疗效显著并具有安全性,是激素受体阳性(HR+)晚期乳腺癌患者的主要治疗方法。近年来内分泌领域发展迅速,如何延迟或逆转内分泌耐药及内分泌治疗新药物成为临床研究关注的焦点。研究发现,内分泌治疗耐药可能与CDK-RB-E2F通路有关,针对该通路的细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)4/6抑制剂可显著延缓HR+晚期乳腺癌患者内分泌耐药。CDK4/6抑制剂与内分泌药物联合使用,可提高HR+晚期乳腺癌患者的治疗客观缓解率,并可显著改善无进展生存期(PFS)。现就CDK4/6抑制剂的作用机制、药物有效性和安全性及相关临床试验做一综述。     

HMGB1 is a key factor for tamoxifen resistance and has the potential to predict the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women. Hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (HR + BC) is the most common pathological type of breast cancer, of which the main treatment method is endocrine therapy. Unfortunately, primary or acquired drug resistance greatly limits its efficacy. In recent years, the newly launched CDK4/6 inhibitors could effectively reverse endocrine resistance in breast cancer. However, considering their expensive price and side effects, it is particularly important to find out effective biomarkers and screen sensitive patients. Here, we found through bioinformatics analysis that high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) expression increased in endocrine-resistant HR + BC. In clinical specimens, the higher expression of HMGB1 was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) for HR + BC patients with endocrine therapy after surgery. For endocrine-resistant breast cancer, compared with HMGB1-negative patients, HMGB1-positive patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors treatment benefited more in PFS. Moreover, we demonstrated that HMGB1 promoted tamoxifen resistance by combining with the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and activating nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway. CDK4/6 inhibitors could downregulate the expression of HMGB1 and suppress the TLR4-NF-κB pathway, and in turn reverse tamoxifen resistance. These results illuminated the critical role of HMGB1 in the process of tamoxifen resistance, explained the mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitors reversing tamoxifen resistance, and suggested the feasibility of HMGB1 as a potential biomarker for screening sensitive patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors.     

The next era of treatment for hormone receptor-positive,HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: Triplet combination-based endocrine therapies

Until recently, the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer was single-agent endocrine therapy, which aims to prevent estrogen receptor signaling. This therapeutic strategy has extended survival without the toxicity associated with chemotherapy, but primary endocrine therapy resistance is common, and secondary resistance develops over time. Adjunct downstream inhibition of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 pathway, intended to delay and prevent endocrine therapy resistance, has further extended progression-free survival in patients receiving endocrine therapy; however, resistance still eventually develops in these patients. Addition of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors to combined CDK4/6 and endocrine inhibitor regimens may help prolong CDK4/6 inhibitor sensitivity. Early trials combining CDK4/6 inhibitors, PI3K or mTOR inhibitors, and endocrine therapy have shown encouraging signs of clinical activity. However, further research is needed to help understand the extent of treatment benefit from triplet therapy and where this strategy will fit in the treatment sequence for patients with HR+ breast cancer.     

Comparative efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive,HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundCDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors are both emerging agents for hormonal receptor (HR) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancer. Evidence for the comparisons from head-to-head comparative trials is currently insufficient. This meta-analysis assessed the comparative efficacy and safety of these two groups of agents for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.MethodsSystematic searches of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, SciSearch between January 2010 to December 2019 were conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated clinical benefits and toxicities of CDK4/6 inhibitors or PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors plus endocrine therapy were adopted. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoint was treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and risk rate (RR) were used to assess the differences between CDK4/6 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors.ResultsA total of twenty RCTs including 9771 participants were identified in this study. Pooled results showed that PFS was considerably prolonged by targeted therapy plus endocrine therapy. PFS was relatively better in CDK4/6 inhibitors than that of PI3K inhibitor group (HR, 1.43; 95%CrI, 1.12-1.61). Similar results were demonstrated in results after balancing lines of therapy or metastatic sites, both in viscera and bone-only. Coalesced outcomes revealed that CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy could significantly improve OS (HR, 0.78; 95%CrI, 0.65-0.94) than PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. Safety profiles of diarrhea and rash were consistent between CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors with no difference of estimated RR. Several TRAEs signified specificity, for instance, myelosuppression in CDK4/6 inhibitors or hyperglycemia in PI3K/mTOR inhibitors.ConclusionsClinical efficacy is in favor of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and safety profiles are comparable between CDK4/6 inhibitors or PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors plus endocrine therapy.     

Aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer

The aromatase inhibitors are regarded as standard approaches to first- or second-line endocrine therapy in women with hormone-responsive metastatic breast cancer. Their efficacy and apparent lack of toxicity have led to their evaluation as adjuvant therapy. Although initial results with these agents in early breast cancer are promising, our collective long-term experience documenting tamoxifen's benefits and our uncertainty about the long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors suggest that it is too early to recommend their routine use in the adjuvant setting. However, anastrozole is also a reasonable therapeutic option in the adjuvant setting, particularly in individuals with a contraindication to tamoxifen such as those with thromboembolic disease or those who develop breast cancer while receiving tamoxifen or raloxifene (Evista) therapy. Anastrozole (Arimidex) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. Ongoing trials are assessing the potential role of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and preventive settings.     

Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the current clinical status and possible future applications of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer. METHODS: A review of the literature on the third-generation aromatase inhibitors was conducted. Some data that have been presented but not published are included. In addition, the designs of ongoing trials with aromatase inhibitors are outlined and the implications of possible results discussed. RESULTS: All of the third-generation oral aromatase inhibitors--letrozole, anastrozole, and vorozole (nonsteroidal, type II) and exemestane (steroidal, type I)--have now been tested in phase III trials as second-line treatment of postmenopausal hormone-dependent breast cancer. They have shown clear superiority compared with the conventional therapies and are therefore considered established second-line hormonal agents. Currently, they are being tested as first-line therapy in the metastatic, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. Preliminary results suggest that the inhibitors might displace tamoxifen as first-line treatment, but further studies are needed to determine this. CONCLUSION: The role of aromatase inhibitors in premenopausal breast cancer and in combination with chemotherapy and other anticancer treatments are areas of future exploration. The ongoing adjuvant trials will provide important data on the long-term safety of aromatase inhibitors, which will help to determine their suitability for use as chemopreventives in healthy women at risk of developing breast cancer.